Thabo Mbeki has received worldwide criticism for his AIDS stance. He questions the link between viruses and AIDS and believes that the correlation between poverty and the AIDS rate in Africa was a challenge to the viral theory of AIDS. The delay in distributing antiretroviral drugs is attributed to the ban he placed on their use in public state hospitals, and is also linked to the estimated deaths of some hundreds of thousands.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny I don't understand why you're so vitriolically against HIV as the cause for AIDS. Virologists the world over say it is ... but somehow you know better?
Also, many of Peter Duesberg's claims are demonstrably false. He can't get his papers past peer-review thus resorts to publishing in dubious journals that don't peer-review submissions. You're suggesting there's a vast inter-continental conspiracy of scientists suppressing his work? Nutter.
@G0lfYankee Why? Um...because even the "discoverer" never found any such thing in an aids patient. That is WHY Gallo's antibody tests have no Gold Standard. Go see what the manufacturers say about their own products. Is reading labels a "conspiracy theory" now?
You may as well be using an e-meter to "prove" body thetans cause aids.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny So when a room full of competent virologists tell you their research wouldn't be at all possible if HIV wasn't the cause of AIDS and cite 20 years of research to back up their claim, you respond with ... "the discoverer! antibodies aren't real! check the definitions! the evil drug companies are out to get us!"
It's you against 99% of the human race and 100% of the world's competent scientists. They're all laughing at you. Doesn't that bother you?
GALLOS antibody tests. "Proof" by consensus is NOT science. Go ask all those experts for the peer reviewed SCIENTIFIC reference where Gallo actually isolated any such virus of mass destruction out of someone allegedly dying of it in order to scientifically validate those tests.
@G0lfYankee Yes..I KNOW virus of mass destruction cultists have no LOGICAL point to make. YOU used quotation marks. Do you not understand what they mean?
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Virus of mass destruction cultists?! What the .... fuck? Are you refering to the human race? I've got to ask: where do you buy your drugs? They are messing you up.
And really? Grammar? Lol do YOU know how to use quotation marks? Wikipedia has a 3,000 word entry on their usage. Do you honestly believe they're only for verbatim quotes? Maybe you should learn a thing or two about English before you start mouthing off to people about their grammar, eh?
@G0lfYankee Honey...personal attacks are NOT a scientifically valid test ofr "hiv" infection OR the Title Date and Journal of a scientific reference to support your belief in a virus of mass destruction. WHEN did I attack your grammar? Answer....I didn't. You're just plain lying now.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Firstly, quotation marks are a type of GRAMMAR, stupid. Criticising my use of them is therefore criticising my grammar. Secondly, like I said, Wikipedia has a three THOUSAND word entry on their use, you should read it sometime. There was nothing wrong with how I used them.
And calling you stupid isn't a personal attack, it's a statement based on evidence. Overwhelming evidence, some might say.
@G0lfYankee WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY
"lease be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information.
....... Wikipedia is not uniformly peer reviewed; while readers may correct errors or engage in casual peer review, they have no legal duty to do so and thus all information read here is without any implied warranty of fitness for any purpose or use whatsoever.
@G0lfYankee So......no SCIENTIFIC info that the test kit manufacturers missed about their own products? Just an appeal to FALSE authority. You virus of mass destruction cultists are all alike.
@G0lfYankee Appeal to ridicule is also NOT science. You could write the book on logical fallacies just using concordance the fraudster's videos as examples.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Gallo's antibody tests? What is this, 1987? The Gold Standard for HIV testing is PCR. And ELISA, the standard lab test, is magnificently accurate. Just because private companies market crappy saliva tests and call them valid doesn't make it so. I can buy a shitty iPhone knockoff from China, does that make all iPhones fake? Of course not, what a daft argument.
@G0lfYankee GALLO is the test kit patent holder. Duh! I have the direct links to the "hiv" test kit disclaimers on my channel
"At present (2011) there is.......... no recognized standard.......... for establishing the presence or absence of HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibody in human blood"
HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS TYPES 1 AND 2: (E. COLI, B. MEGATERIUM, RECOMBINANT ANTIGEN)
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Jesus, this shit must consume your life. Well it's been fun. Enjoy screaming at the walls.
I shall revel in the knowledge that literally noone of consequence gives a flying fuck about AIDS denialism, except the denialists of course. Those poor bastards. Don't forget to check the secret messages I left that tell you the dark secret C0nc0rdance doesn't want you to know! Oooohwoooo! Haha. Yankee out.
@G0lfYankee Lol....exactly. You have ZERO scientific evidence. Nobody disputes the existence of aids. That is a MISrepresentation of the dissident position. What's in dispute is the cause.
@G0lfYankee Why do people resort to making ad hominem attacks? Because they CANT win an argument on the merits of their case. Frustrated and infuriated, the believers lash out at those who reveal that their Emperor is nude. AIDStruthers CANT cite a set of specific publications to prove that “HIV” tests detect active infection, and they CANTcite a set of specific publications to prove that “HIV” causes AIDS; so they try to “kill the messengers” who bring these facts to public attention.
Google.......Kalichman disclaims and makes AD HOMONYM attacks (Does illiteracy matter? — Kalichman’s Komical Kaper #9)
" What’s really wrong with resorting to ad hominem statements — personal attacks on people you disagree with — isn’t that they’re uncivil or that they might offend someone, it’s that they are IRRELEVANT to the subject under discussion........"
@G0lfYankee The PCR disclaimer is just under that.
PCR disclaimer....The ... AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, v1.5 is.......NOT......... intended to be used as a screening test for blood or blood products for the presence of HIV-1 or as a diagnostic test to confirm the presence of HIV-1 infection.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Do you even understand what you're saying? Do you know what these words you lifted off the Roche website mean? Do you know why they say it?
The answer is no, otherwise you would have picked up on the clinical significance of the words "screening" and "diagnostic test". It's designed for viral load testing, not diagnosis or blood screens, that's all the disclaimer means.
There aren't secret messages hidden at the bottom of websites just to taunt you.
PCR disclaimer....The ... AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, v1.5 is.......NOT......... intended to be used as a screening test for blood or blood products for the presence of HIV-1 or as a diagnostic test to confirm the presence of HIV-1 infection.
YOU claimed that PCR was used for diagnosing "hiv" infection. I pointed out what the test kit manufacturers claim for their own product.
@G0lfYankee Do I need to remind you of what YOU claimed? Scroll back to your comment from an hour ago. YOU claimed that the "Gold Standard" for "hiv" TESTING is an ELISA followed up by PCR. Did you "forget"?
@G0lfYankee So.....can you NAME a scientifically valid test for "hiv" infection? You CLAIMED to be a biochemist who goes to peer reviewed science for your info. Lol...of course the only thing you referenced was McWiki.
NAME a scientifically valid test for "hiv" infection O Anonymous youtube "expert" No....shooting messengers is NOT a Gold Standard for those crap tests.
So HIV does not cause AIDS...and AIDS is caused by injecting drugs and using chemotherapeutic drugs and u cannot get it by having sexual relations with an AIDS sufferer..did i get it right?..so i can have sex with someone with AIDS and be sure that i will not be getting sick at all since its not transmissible..right?? If i do get sick,thn if its not HIV thn what is making me sick since AIDS is not transmissible.....this doc is raising a lot of questions...clearly misleading people.
@sunnysey89 "Aids" as defined how? There are about a dozen different definitions.
If you have sex with someone who is sick with something infectious then you can catch it. "Aids" never left the original "risk groups" of nearly 28 years ago so that means "aids" isnt infectious. Infectious things spread.
Google....There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit
"“Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits”, The Independent announced on June 8, 2008.."
@mykoolaidtastesfunny I get it. AIDS worries you. You don't want there to be an incurable infectious STD to be a part of the world you live in, so you cope with it by pretending it doesn't exist.
You create a world where there's an elaborate conspiracy where the thousands of scientists studying HIV (including all the new students who got their PhDs in the last 20 years) are in on it and out to get you. You've turned a threat you can't do anything about into one you can.
@G0lfYankee Honey....you need to stop getting "your" ideas from internet drug marketers.
Playing "Dr" Phil with skeptics is NOT scientific evidence. Concordance is a demonstrable liar so I'm not interested in you trying to pass off crap you found on his videos as "your" ideas.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Why do you keep going on about C0nc0rdance? I've never mentioned him once, but you seem obsessed.
Also, I'm not playing "Dr Phil", I'm playing Dr G0lfYankee. I'm a biomedical scientist, fucktard. Drug companies get their ideas from me, not the other way around. I get my information from the same place as any respectable scientist -- peer-reviewed journals and the original research conducted by myself and my colleagues.
@G0lfYankee Lol...because I've dealt with you VMD cultists before, you have a video of his on your channel and you are practically copy pasting his ideas.
Honey...the original research was found to be TOTALLY fraudulent and impossible to repeat or verify during the TWO US gov. investigations into the matter. You have offered ZERO scientific evidence for your beliefs. It's just one logical fallacy after another with you people
@G0lfYankee I go to experts with identities and credentials I can easily verify thanks. You haven't offered up any science and you CLAIMING to be a scientist doesn't excuse all your logical fallacies that you present INSTEAD of any peer reviewed science.
@G0lfYankee These are the alleged "hiv" proteins....... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160
as "discovered" By Gallo ha ha and those are the proteins.........ALL..........the so-called "hiv" tests revolve around. Um...WHEN exactly did Gallo actually make a Direct isolation of this alleged VMD out of someone allegedly dying of it in order to scientifically validate those tests?
@G0lfYankee Are the test kit manufacturers "conspiring" against their own products? Lol...isn't it "funny" the info concordance excludes from his videos? I have the direct links to the test kit disclaimers on my channel under the profile pic.
@sunnysey89 AIDS is not a virus, it cannot be transmitted. It is the breakdown of immune system caused by stress (AIDS drugs, poppers, malnutrition, etc.).
@dz1ncha And you know this because you've read all 1,743,638 papers published on HIV/AIDS in the last 20 years and have concluded, despite the opinions of hundreds of thousands of qualified scientists, that everyone is wrong.
Then you submit your hypothesis about 'stress' based on the zero original research you've done, propose no mechanism, make no predictions and call it a job well done - *claps slowly* - congratulations! You've just disproved science! What will you do next?
@G0lfYankee NAME the peer reviewed scientific reference the dissident have been asking for. Lol...go as the anonymous youtube "scientist" for it :P
It isn't up to skeptics to do your homework for you. "Proof" by consensus and "proof" by assertion are not science no matter what some internet drug marketers would have you beleeeve lol
@sunnysey89 I agree. If Peter Douchebag is so convinced HIV is neither infectious nor the cause of AIDS, how's about he tests his theory on himself and rids us all of his stupidity.
@G0lfYankee Lol...let me guess...."You" think he should INJECT himself right?
You need to stop getting "your" ideas from UNqualified internet drug marketers honey. You CANT inject yourself with something that doesn't exist. You can't inject yourself with demons either.
@G0lfYankee Google........The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia
"who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?
A dozen people who include a graduate student (Ken Witwer), a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials (Martin Delaney......), and a PhD in a NON-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman) Yet these people say Mullis and Duesberg aren’t qualified to talk about HIV/AIDS because they’ve never done research on it!"
@G0lfYankee See on youtube........Living Proof The Lindsey Nagel Story
Cheryl and Lindsey Nagel on the Robert Scott Bell Show. How does a 2 week old HIV+ Romanian adoptee (circa 1990) become a healthy 19 year old in 2009? Hint: NO HIV DRUGS. Cheryl Nagel joins me for her first interview since House of Numbers was released to share a story that cannot be told in the HIV-worshipping mainstream media. Lindsey Nagel is alive today precisely because of Peter Duesbergs intervention.
@Katkinsful's retarded sockpuppet.....Did you "forget"? There is no "new" disease. It's just a bunch of old diseases lumped together using Gallo's crap antibody test.
so basically if you have HIV then get a bad illness after that.. it progresses to aids? if this is the case, then hiv does still cause aids. certainly getting the flu won't cause AIDS.. this aids conspiracy seems like wishful thinking
Can someone please tell me why this hasn't been brought to the public eye? I am an 18 year old high school student who has very little training in any sort of advanced chemistry or retroviruses but this seems like 100% solid evidence that would suggest that our previous view on HIV causing AIDS is in fact wrong? Why aren't we being educated on this?
I have never been tested and never will. Just eat right, take the right nutrients, like how God Created the World with nature and natural supplements and you will be fine..Of course there are 10000000s of Viruses out there and Bacteria, so all these so called Machines that test are all FAKE! We all know the Pharmaceutical Companies love to make money and this is this there business, or else they wouldnt be getting a paycheck, would they?
you opppl are really fucking dumb take the meds now and we will return back to the 80s with ppl with all sorts of deceases appearing suddenly s side effect of hiv, i can have problems in my imuno but not have aids because i havent got hiv its hiv thats pushes more and more for other deceases as the body gets weaker nd weaker
futher more i was a heroin user and i do not had aids because i never caught hiv drugs can cause problems and imuno suppresant deceases but not cancer or aids itself cases are rare if not existent at all this vid is not only dangerous its bullshit
i bet all these ppl who fight to make hiv and ais a lie do not have hiv if they had they would open their eyes and take the meds to make the viral load low, i lived next to ppl with hiv and the meds worked binging the viral load down, yes magic has hiv witch can cause aids ppl with good body defenses and good genes last longer thats just it, many other deceases can cause cancer or imune problems and hiv is one of those virus
@ukusapillage Magic doesn't admit to taking any of the "lifesaving" meds. He just cashes the checks
google.....The Magic Effect: How to Push Drugs Without Taking Them Yourself
" Asked why he stopped and what AIDS drugs he was taking, Johnson responded in well-practiced Glaxo-speak: “The medication that I take is a decision that my doctors and I make.”
Magic’s didn’t start pushing AIDS into the black community until GlaxoSmithKline paid millions of dollars for Magic to push Combivir........"
this is wrong, sarcosi dosent appear in young ppl normally so if it does they usually have hiv, what hiv does is open to the door for other virus and deceases, i aggre that pharma industry makes loads and do not nwant a cure theres cure already ismade with goat blood goats have the best imune sistem of all living animals, hiv can cause aids or suppressant imuno deceases
Bull shit. HIV kills the CD4 T cells that are responsible for defending the human body. The people that has HIV but not AIDS is a temporary phase, a matter of time, when the virus population increase and the CD4 count lows bellow 250 the person is in very danger of appearing the opportunistic diseases. This video is BULL SHIT. HIV will cause aids (if not treated) to every person its a matter of time. Taking anti-retroviral drugs, the CD4 goes high and viral load goes down. PERIOD.
@sacaneichonbr "Proof" by assertion is logical fallacy NOT evidence. If YOU have the primary peer reviewed scientific reference the dissident scientists have been looking for feel free to share.....Title Date and Journal.
Feel free to post it to my feature video....Why I Quit Hiv with Kary Mullis - Rodney Richards - more HoN
I block after 3 logical fallacies though so you may want to brush up on what they are first.
@sacaneichonbr Google..... 20 Unanswerable Questions for AIDS Inc.
#5. Why do most individuals with low CD4 counts....NOT.... develop AIDS-defining illnesses (11, 12)?
#8. Why does "viral load" account for only 4% of the change in CD4 count cell loss in HIV-positive asymptomatics (15)?
#20. Why have improvements in "virological responses" ("viral load" and CD4 counts) to HAART ....NOT......translated into decreased clinical progression to AIDS and death (31)?
Jesus says go through all the world and preach the Gospel. This vid right here, is GOSPEL. Good news and TRUTH that the evil media and government are suppressing from us! Therefore many have died from lack of knowledge.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny - of course he'd need to know a lot about HIV, the man might be the greatest expert in the field - it's what gives him power and credibility to do harm. He's thoughtful, you guys are just a little crazy and a little stupid. I don't think you can argue with crazy, so I'm signing off. Enjoy your dream world, I'll enjoy mine. You won't change my mind, I won't change yours.
@dsv400 Honey....calling people names isn't scientific evidence and the burden of proof is on believers not skeptics. You get all your "scientific" info from UNqualified anonymous amatuers and internet marketers with ZERO credentials
" it’s worth noting too that Duesberg’s criticism of inflated AIDS-death numbers for South Africa, suppressed from Medical Hypotheses, has been vindicated by publication in a peer-reviewed, PubMed-abstracted journal [Medical students in Africa need not fear HIV, 2010/05/31 ; REPRINT of Galletti & Bauer, 2010/06/03]..... The UC Berkeley investigation found that the charges could not be sustained, even though the task had been delegated to an....."
@dsv400 Why do you virus of mass destruction cultists not hit reply when replying to someone? Are you really that cowardly and unsure of your claims? All you ever get out of you VMD cultists is name calling and personal attacks. Lol...you're supposed to just beleeeeve in the VMD I guess.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny - I have nothing against his credentials. My issue with him is that he's a calculated, thoughtful mass murderer. Hitler had many accredited scientists building him weapons, killing people and doing awful things. Peter is a killer, you're just stupid. You still haven't told me where you'd like to meet for your "nothing" injection.
@dsv400 Lol.....honey...libelling someone with Baseless accusations doesn't change the science. Making up lies about someone does not address his points.
Do you not understand what a peer reviewed scientific reference is?
@dsv400 Duesberg is a killer? Did you know he spoke out about how dangerous AZT is? Why? Because AZT was invented in the 60's by Burroughs-Wellcome Pharmaceuticals as a cancer chemotherapeutic agent, but found that it was too hazardous to be used as such. Only when the HIV/AIDS scare came along, was Burroughs-Wellcome able to take it back off the shelf and relabel it as a treatment for AIDS, therefore recouping the money they lost on AZT development and testing in the 60's. AZT is the killer.
@jffryfnt science is about. It is about the ability to freely publish and discuss your findings. That is how we go forward in science. Until proven what you are saying is theory. And everyone else should be allowed to put their point of view forward without being called childish names, having their research cancelled, and alienated. It is NOT fully proven and in science you cant do anything on a hunch. IT HAS TO BE ACCURATE. Gallo was already a fraud, and Faucci became a multi millionaire.
Peter Duesberg is awful. His german accent and credentials and vocabulary give him a false air of intelligence and authority, but he is a racist, homophobic mass murderer. AIDS and HIV is not a hoax.
@dsv400 Google....The unqualified (= without qualifications) gurus of Wikipedia
You unbelievably gullible tit. What have you got against actual scientists? — Dr. Peter Duesberg, PhD, Professor of Molecular Biology, University of California, member, National Academy of Sciences, first to map the genetic structure of retroviruses. Five-time recipient of the National Institutes of Health’s Outstanding Investigator Grant.
I have listen to the comments of Doctor Peter, but he does not say why in Africa there is so many cases of Aids although drug use and homosexuality is low comparing to western countries?
@jucaepalanga If you've listened then how is that you think he ever said "aids" in Africa has anything to do with drug abuse or homosexuality? Why do you think just being gay is a problem at all instead of the drug abuse? I suspect you didn't really listen at all.
of course there can't be an HIV specific disease. it weakens your immune system and then anything can attack you. what a retarded argument. AIDS isn't a single disease - it is an acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
@SoHoTandCool You have no evidence for the claim that "hiv" weakens the immune system. "Proof" be assertion is a logical fallacy not evidence. If YOU have the primary peer reviewed scientific papers which prove the existence of Gallo's alleged virus of mass destruction and linked it to immune problems feel free to post the reference to my featured video....Why I Quit Hiv with Kary Mullis - Rodney Richards - more HoN
@mykoolaidtastesfunny And how many logical fallacies could I possibly enumerate in your response?? Ugh...'You have no evidence'? "Proof" be assertion [sic] is a logical fallacy not evidence? What the @$#% is a 'primary' peer reviewed scientific paper which 'prove' the, save your rant: the HIV virus..and it's consequences on the immune system...your whole rant is fraught with fallacies, and YOU are the purveyor of all that is logical??? 3X's your out?? You are #$%#$ing DELUDED.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny If I could logically 'dis-believe' it I would. What you fail to realize, in your highly un-skeptical state of psychosis, is that you are parading around in a disingenuous charade that there is no scientific evidence for HIV. YET, at the same time, claim to require the standard of scientific evidence when it exists. How convenient for you to APPEAL TO IGNORANCE. IF you were skeptical, you could find the evidence.
@jffryfnt Lol...sweetie...diagnosing me isn't a scientific reference and would be highly unethical to do online even IF you were qualified to render such diagnosis.
I AM skeptical but it isn't up to me to go find your evidence for you. The burden of proof is on believers NOT skeptics. Seriously....I'm not kidding. Google.....BURDEN OF PROOF
@mykoolaidtastesfunny It IS up to you, if you are going to make the boisterous claims that you are. You are not skeptical at all I know the evidence, I've read the evidence. There's THOUSANDS of scientific, peer-reviewed papers on the subject, and you claim they don't exist? That can ONLY happen with will-full ignorance darling. And please, don't tell me to google anything,k? Google isn't going to save you nor your ignorant position.
@jffryfnt No honey....the burden of proof is always on believers not skeptics. You don't get to re-write the rules of logical to accommodate your virus of mass destruction cult.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You're not a skeptic. You are a LIAR. What's in this for you? Are you seriously going to keep pretending the evidence isn't there? Go to the Science webpage, or Nature, or PNAS, JEM, JI, Immunology, etc etc etc, and search HIV and/or AIDS, they will list the references of the scientific journal articles they have published on the subject. Your ignorance is a disease. Go to PubMed. Stop playing ignorant!
WHAT evidence!?!?!??! Lol....WOW....good thing I'm not holding my breath waiting. NONE of you virus of mass destruction cultists can ever actually name any. You just yap about how much of it there is lol
@mykoolaidtastesfunny ummm...have you ever like done, a science project in school? or even any like, research project? do you KNOW what a scientific journal article is? can you name any scientific journals? do you know the difference between credible ones and ones that are not? are you fluent in critical analysis with regards to information? I sincerely suspect not, because anyone with any of the above skills know with a higher degree of confidence,what indeed we know to be facts in this reality
@jffryfnt Why are you dodging your burden of proof?
And.....since you work so hard to avoid naming the appropriate reference that the dissident scientists have been asking for.....I suspect you know it's all big lie too so....WHY the fuck are you defending Gallo's three legged dog of a theory?
@mykoolaidtastesfunny ????? What?? I'm trying to tell you how to find the info!!! How much more clearly do I need to spell it out for you?? Oh so how true that old saying goes: you can lead a horse to water...
@jffryfnt Dude....don't act stupid. You've done nothing but call me names for asking. Also did you "forget"?
We;ve been over this many times on many videos. It is NOT up to me to go find your evidence for you and the burden of proof is on believers NOT skeptics. Seriously....wtf
@mykoolaidtastesfunny tard...just because you haven't seen it, doesn't mean it does not exist. and that's the card you're playing. frankly, whatever has happened to corrupt your mind into thinking what you do, but let me remind you that you are representative of a disparate fringe and barely insignificant bunch,of deniers, and you mock those that are truly skeptical. The evidence exists, it's published. That's where there is a SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS that HIV is real, and it causes AIDS.
@jffryfnt Omg....STILL?!!?? You're STILL yapping about alll this mysterious frikkin evidence? Consensus is politics not science. Voting isn't going to make the imaginary real. Wtf? Look at your comments....one evasion after another. You may as well be yelling "AMEN" over and over again
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Sorry 'someonepissedinyourkoolaid', I'm kinda thinking that you perhaps has AIDs, or someone close to you..And you're desperate to find an alternative explanation. Because otherwise, I don't know what possibly could explain your delusions. Someone must have dropped a lot of apples on your head before you finally acknowledged that gravity is a theory, and is real. HIV, is real. AIDS, is real. And I KNOW you know that.
@jffryfnt Dude....will you stop with the Dr Phil crap? That isn't scientific evidence. Nobody disputes the existence of immune problems so where you get this "aids is real" I'm sure I don't know. Who is disputing that? NO....I do NOT believe in something even the "discoverers" never actually found. I don't beleeeeve in body thetans either.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You are literally a garbage information harvester of the internet. All you have is empty rhetoric and a completely defiant attitude towards the 'system'. You're a cynic. If not, much anything less than a flat-Earther. It must take a lot of energy to perform such willful ignorance such that you display so poignantly. In fact, I think you just need a 'conspiracy' in your life in an attempt to make yourself feel important. Bad choice, the evidence is stacked against you.
@jffryfnt Do you work for fifa, or are you working for gadaffi, maybe a bank. I hate to tell you this but after working for western governments and banks, you need to understand that some organisations are corrupt. South Africa is receiving a lot of money from the global fund by exaggerating aids. They are also the only country who is opposing the Libyans who have had their money stolen from them. WHY? because they also get a lot of money from Gadaffi. It is £1.5 billion a year.
@sasawells Just because of the mere existence of corruption doesn't presume that the science is corrupt. The evidence is detailed in the scientific literature. Obviously, anyone who subscribes to HIV/AIDS denialism is literally scientifically inept. I do biomedical research in a not-for-profit scientific institution, namely tuberculosis research--of which most people with AIDS, especially in Africa, will die from opportunistic TB infections.
@jffryfnt If you are an expert on tubercolosis, you will realise that the main reason it appears is due to malnutrition, and oxiditive stress. That with weight loss, and diarrhea is an AIDS diagnosis in Africa. WITHOUT any diagnosis of HIV. How can you defend that as science. In the Ethiopia famine, it would have been an Aids crisis as well as a famine. Only HIV was not mainstream media at the time. It is not and never has been a pandemic in the western world. This is from the WHO .
@sasawells First of all,you have to realize that the main reason it 'appears',is because you are bloody infected. We live in a very dog eat dog world and the ONLY reason that you have such an evolved immune system is because of the millions of years that we've co-evolved...with pathogens.Otherwise, we wouldn't have an immune system. HIV infects CD4 T cells.An unhealthy T-cell stands a much less chance in resisting infection if it is malnourished, obviously.Cells need nutrition.What else you got?
@jffryfnt Talking about HIV and pubmed. HIV was cured a while ago. If it was a disease. It was cured by boosting the immune system lol. check pubmed/19031451 Immunotherapy of HIV-infected patients with Gc protein-derived macrophage activating factor (GcMAF) When this came out they hid it, and issued a statement that HIV will NEVER EVER be cured. You have to understand 50 thousand jobs and billions of pounds rely on it never being cured, and dodgy statistics from South Africa.
@sasawells Um...do you know why it's not always useful to inadvertently activate 'sleeping' macrophages? Macrophages are perhaps the most active immune cell type that there is! After all, what cell type do you think cleans up EVERYTHING in your body: dead cells, DNA fragments, proteins, etc etc etc...Macrophages are NON-SPECIFIC. Apparently this article wasn't hidden too well, hence was published in the Journal of Medical Virology. And, interestingly, has only been cited ONCE.
@jffryfnt I think you will find that the reason for this is because they dont want to investigate. There reaction was that they need to test more. They then sent out a cream tested on 45 people that they said protected you against hiv. ie 55 percent got infected instead of 70 percent. What kind of science is THAT. They dont want to know. Other research has been done on the work of Yamamoto, and they have had the same results. It should get media attention but they dont want it public. Its crazy
@jffryfnt Ok Talking about DNA fragments, you do know that HIV is coded in the human genome. An ancient form, but none the less when a cell breaks down, this CELLULAR DEBRIS dna fragment breaks up and, is dispersed. There is a lot we dont know about the body. You me, Fauci or Gallo. Anyone who is arrogant enough to stand up, and say they understand it by detecting antibodies to certain proteins, has a very narrow view. To disregard everyone who contributes but their view differs is not what
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You know, we GAIN knowledge through observation and experience. The scientific method is an extension of those very basic and fundamental things. But science has been elevated to a very high standard through repeated observation and repetition, and publishing those results. It doesn't matter about Gallo's first paper on the subject, because his observations have been repeated thousands of times over.
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Your only arguments come from OUTSIDE of the scientific process, e.g. quotes, documentaries, etc. Show me a paper, a statistically and methodologically sound scientific paper that disproves the thousands of scientific published articles on the subject that HIV does not cause AIDS. Hey, you want the Nobel Prize in medicine? Then why don't YOU publish the paper yourself. Perhaps you could be like that guy that 'proved' that bacteria causes ulcers...he got the Nobel Prize!
“[Aids] is not ‘God’s wrath’ or any other absurdity. A segment of our society was experimenting with their lifestyle, and it didn’t work. They got sick. Another segment of our pluralistic society, call them doctor/scientist refugees from the failed War on Cancer, or just call them professional jackals, discovered that it did work. It worked for them. They are still making payments on their new BMWs out of your pocket.”
quote is from an expert with an identity and credentials that are easily verified..... Dr. Kary Mullis, PhD, Biochemist, Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for inventing PCR the basis for the HIV viral load tests
for more google....IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW” SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
i think the hiv=aids belief is purely religious thats why all the emotion in defending it. a brother of mine tested positive in '94 and and never got sick until he started taking the drugs in '01 but some1 told him and convinced him to stop after a year of being sick but after stopping he got better and four years later he tested negative. he tested again over and over thinking it was a mistake but still negative he's married now and has a two year old daughter. he thinks its a miracle..duh..
hi!! i just wanna thank you for this videos they really opened my eyes :) not the way that you espected tho hehe XD...jokes a side i gotta say i really wish this was true because it's not fair how some people "get" aids just cuz they had sex with someone and they have to spend theire whole life paying the price :( i really don't know what to belive anymore but i wish "mykoolaidtastesfunny" and "jffryfnt" could help me clear some doubts about both sides ok :) thank you again
You have to remember that Magic was thrown to the political lions in 1991 with his HIV test. Magic Johnson is a JOCK and an entertainer, he didn't like the political heat then, so he became very quite for several years. Unlike Tommy Morrison, who has gone public about the disputes against HIV/AID$ and the toxic drugs, Magic smiles with that S@#$ eating grin and sells the drug program with his fried chicken. He probably DID take HIV meds ONE TIME and ONE dose. He is paid performer now.
Google....IS A POSITIVE WESTERN BLOT PROOF OF HIV INFECTION?
Papadopulos-Eleopulos, E., Turner, V. F. & Papadimitriou, J. M. Bio/technology 11, 696-707 (1993)
"The available evidence indicates that: (a) the antibody tests are..NOT...standardised... because NO GLD STANDARD has been used and may not even exist to determine specificity, a positive WB may represent nothing more than cross‑reactivity with the many non‑HIV antibodies present in AIDS patients ..."
To confirm their complaints I have the direct link to an "hiv" test kit diclaimer on my channel under the pic of the Pope
"“At present there is NO recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood.” (Abbott labs HIV-1/2 test,)
Google....The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia
"So, let's just take a look at who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?
A dozen people who include a graduate student (Ken Witwer), a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials (Martin Delaney, Nathan Geffen, Gregg Gonsalves, Richard Jefferys), and a PhD in a non-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman)..."
@DCFunBud Nope. In fact the World Health Organization cancelled the htero ads epidemic 2 Years ago. The sndrome Gallo's crap tests wer SUPPOSED to predict did NOT spread into the general population just as Duesberg predicted.
Google....THERE WILL BE NO HETEROSEXUAL AIDS EPIDEMIC EXPERTS ADMIT
@wowsdrawkcab You're a cultist. You can't give ANY evidence but you still feel the need to open your yap. You know what papers are required and "NO" the rules of sceince have not changed since this was made. This is a serious topic you sad cultist....keep your idiotic faith to yourself.
@wowsdrawkcab Even a creationist can give chapter and verse. You can't even give title of paper date and journal. Youi literally have ZERO evidence that Gallo's virus even exists.
This film merely attempts to mislead and blur the truth with quote mined interviews, while ignoring valid research (and failing to mention its own failures).
@wowsdrawkcab Duesber has been proven correct. Google...There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit
"“Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits”, The Independent announced on Sunday, June 8, 2008..... Dr. Kevin de Cock of the World Health Organization: “[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.”
“A 25-year health campaign was misplaced outside the continent of Africa,” the article concedes"
@wowsdrawkcab Honey you claiming I misquoted does not make it true. You claimed the film is misleading an only offers opinions. That is total crap. I know you know that Duesberg has been proven correct. You're just a lying little shit
@wowsdrawkcab You sure are "forgetful"...Google....Duesberg vindicated
"In this connection, it’s worth noting too that Duesberg’s criticism of inflated AIDS-death numbers for South Africa, suppressed from Medical Hypotheses, has been vindicated by publication in a peer-reviewed, PubMed-abstracted journal [Medical students in Africa need not fear HIV, 2010/05/31 ; REPRINT of Galletti & Bauer, 2010/06/03].
Why did you post this? Does this mean anything without explanation?
Also is that a tick or something that you have?... putting forgetful in quotes all the time?
Bring the topic back to my comment or at least explain yourself if you want to actually make a point. You're like an excited dog playing with a bee hive that doesn't understand why it keeps getting stung.
@wowsdrawkcab My point is pretty clear...you're a liar and you know you're a liar because you've already had itpointed out to you before. MANY times. It isn't an honest mistake any more
@wowsdrawkcab Honey..YOU are the one who claimed this video is nothing but opinion and misrepresentations. YOU are the one who needs to back that up. What SPECIFICALLY made you say that?
I said why... quote mines mixed with facts leading to a different conclusion of the original quotes. People interviewed after this film came out said themselves that they were misled about the interviews and their statements were later edited to provide a contrary view.
Do you want me to list half the interviews in the film???
Don't try to defend something without knowing both sides. Its like showing up to court without knowing what you have been charged with.
@wowsdrawkcab Well then you're a liar. Whose quotes were misrepresented? Nobody's. WHO came out afterwards and said they were mislead? Nobody. You're a liar and you aren't being specific at all. I doubt you even watched this before opening your yap
I grew up with it in the family sweetie. I know the dogma like the back of my hand. I didn't become a skeptic from a lack of scripture.
Montagnier for one. Take a peek at the original transcript of the interview and then compare to the parts used in the film and most importantly how they are used. My favorite is how they have him saying that a healthy immune system "will" get rid of HIV when he said "can" and he was speaking about ridding the body of the initial infection.
Well sweetie if you grew up with it in the family you must have had your eyes closed the entire time because you know half the story.
@wowsdrawkcab Lol....I did address it. I said BUSTED. Honey...you did NOT watch this video before opening your yap. Montagnier never said anything even remotely similar in this documentary.
Wow really lets move the goal posts some more. I've done what you wanted and threw it in your face. So, no I'm going to pass on this one, go get mommy to hold your hand or something its pro-bowl time.
@wowsdrawkcab I didn't move goalposts at all. I said name SOMETHING that supports our claim that the interviewees were taken out of context etc and that shows you actually watched the vide before opening your mouth
You then quoted a totally different documentary which shows I was right...you never bothered to watch THIS video before offering an opinion on it.
This has been flagged as spam show
Thabo Mbeki has received worldwide criticism for his AIDS stance. He questions the link between viruses and AIDS and believes that the correlation between poverty and the AIDS rate in Africa was a challenge to the viral theory of AIDS. The delay in distributing antiretroviral drugs is attributed to the ban he placed on their use in public state hospitals, and is also linked to the estimated deaths of some hundreds of thousands.
therealadvocate 4 hours ago
And for anyone else taken in by that fraudster concordance....see on youtube.........C0nc0rdance aka JoeMarkLawson the anonymous youtube "scientist"
and........re: c0nc0rdance the anonymous youtube "scientist's" refs for What's the Harm: Eliza Jane Scovill
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
Google......Prosecutors Seek Credible HIV Experts
"Despite OMSJ’s involvement in more than fifty HIV-related criminal cases, only four “HIV experts” have testified – all to their discredit.
Last year, doctors Lisha Wilson and Joseph Marzouk admittedly knew little about the testing and diagnosis of HIV........
Last month, the HIV department chief at the Naval Medical Center, San Diego, performed so poorly that........
OMSJ’s success has left “HIV experts” recoiling like vampires in church."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
What a crock of shit.
G0lfYankee 1 week ago
@G0lfYankee Lol....I knew it. Honey...c0nc0rdance is a fraudster.
see on youtube.......re: c0nc0rdance the anonymous youtube "scientist's" refs for What's the Harm: Eliza Jane Scovill
and.......C0nc0rdance aka JoeMarkLawson the anonymous youtube "scientist"
he lies and censors his channel. That guy has A LOT of blood on his hands.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mykoolaidtastesfunny I don't understand why you're so vitriolically against HIV as the cause for AIDS. Virologists the world over say it is ... but somehow you know better?
Also, many of Peter Duesberg's claims are demonstrably false. He can't get his papers past peer-review thus resorts to publishing in dubious journals that don't peer-review submissions. You're suggesting there's a vast inter-continental conspiracy of scientists suppressing his work? Nutter.
G0lfYankee 2 days ago
@G0lfYankee Why? Um...because even the "discoverer" never found any such thing in an aids patient. That is WHY Gallo's antibody tests have no Gold Standard. Go see what the manufacturers say about their own products. Is reading labels a "conspiracy theory" now?
You may as well be using an e-meter to "prove" body thetans cause aids.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 days ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny So when a room full of competent virologists tell you their research wouldn't be at all possible if HIV wasn't the cause of AIDS and cite 20 years of research to back up their claim, you respond with ... "the discoverer! antibodies aren't real! check the definitions! the evil drug companies are out to get us!"
It's you against 99% of the human race and 100% of the world's competent scientists. They're all laughing at you. Doesn't that bother you?
G0lfYankee 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Research based on WHAT?
GALLOS antibody tests. "Proof" by consensus is NOT science. Go ask all those experts for the peer reviewed SCIENTIFIC reference where Gallo actually isolated any such virus of mass destruction out of someone allegedly dying of it in order to scientifically validate those tests.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee STRAWMAN
WHEN did I claim "antibodies aren't real" or "the evil drug companies are out to get us"?
Do NOT make false allegations about what I've claimed.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Haha. Strawman? That wasn't a straw man, I was making fun of you. "Derp de derp derp". That's what you sound like.
But seriously, you couldn't tell the difference between "false allegations" and me mocking you? Lol.
G0lfYankee 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Yes..I KNOW virus of mass destruction cultists have no LOGICAL point to make. YOU used quotation marks. Do you not understand what they mean?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Virus of mass destruction cultists?! What the .... fuck? Are you refering to the human race? I've got to ask: where do you buy your drugs? They are messing you up.
And really? Grammar? Lol do YOU know how to use quotation marks? Wikipedia has a 3,000 word entry on their usage. Do you honestly believe they're only for verbatim quotes? Maybe you should learn a thing or two about English before you start mouthing off to people about their grammar, eh?
G0lfYankee 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Honey...personal attacks are NOT a scientifically valid test ofr "hiv" infection OR the Title Date and Journal of a scientific reference to support your belief in a virus of mass destruction. WHEN did I attack your grammar? Answer....I didn't. You're just plain lying now.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Quote marks indicate a quote. You did NOT quote me. You set up strawmen.
So......STILL no SCIENTIFIC evidence then? Of course not.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Firstly, quotation marks are a type of GRAMMAR, stupid. Criticising my use of them is therefore criticising my grammar. Secondly, like I said, Wikipedia has a three THOUSAND word entry on their use, you should read it sometime. There was nothing wrong with how I used them.
And calling you stupid isn't a personal attack, it's a statement based on evidence. Overwhelming evidence, some might say.
G0lfYankee 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Then I guess I DID criticise your grammer because you MISused the quotation marks.
McWiki? Google........The unqualified (= without qualifications) gurus of Wikipedia
Also google.........WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY
"lease be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information.
....... Wikipedia is not uniformly peer reviewed; while readers may correct errors or engage in casual peer review, they have no legal duty to do so and thus all information read here is without any implied warranty of fitness for any purpose or use whatsoever.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee So......no SCIENTIFIC info that the test kit manufacturers missed about their own products? Just an appeal to FALSE authority. You virus of mass destruction cultists are all alike.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Google........Prosecutors Seek Credible HIV Experts
I KNOW!!!! Maybe you could send them the McWiki link!!!!
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee So....you do NOT have any info the test kit manufacturers missed about their own products?
LIMITATIONS OF THE PROCEDURE
" The risk of an asymptomatic person with a repeatedly reactive serum sample developing AIDS or an AIDS-related condition is......NOT....... known. "
HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS TYPES 1 AND 2: (E. COLI, B. MEGATERIUM, RECOMBINANT ANTIGEN)
HIVABTM HIV-1/HIV-2 (rDNA) EIA
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Do you have any SCIENTIFIC evidence?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Appeal to ridicule is also NOT science. You could write the book on logical fallacies just using concordance the fraudster's videos as examples.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Gallo's antibody tests? What is this, 1987? The Gold Standard for HIV testing is PCR. And ELISA, the standard lab test, is magnificently accurate. Just because private companies market crappy saliva tests and call them valid doesn't make it so. I can buy a shitty iPhone knockoff from China, does that make all iPhones fake? Of course not, what a daft argument.
G0lfYankee 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee GALLO is the test kit patent holder. Duh! I have the direct links to the "hiv" test kit disclaimers on my channel
"At present (2011) there is.......... no recognized standard.......... for establishing the presence or absence of HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibody in human blood"
HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS TYPES 1 AND 2: (E. COLI, B. MEGATERIUM, RECOMBINANT ANTIGEN)
HIVABTM HIV-1/HIV-2 (rDNA) EIA
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Jesus, this shit must consume your life. Well it's been fun. Enjoy screaming at the walls.
I shall revel in the knowledge that literally noone of consequence gives a flying fuck about AIDS denialism, except the denialists of course. Those poor bastards. Don't forget to check the secret messages I left that tell you the dark secret C0nc0rdance doesn't want you to know! Oooohwoooo! Haha. Yankee out.
G0lfYankee 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Lol....exactly. You have ZERO scientific evidence. Nobody disputes the existence of aids. That is a MISrepresentation of the dissident position. What's in dispute is the cause.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Why do people resort to making ad hominem attacks? Because they CANT win an argument on the merits of their case. Frustrated and infuriated, the believers lash out at those who reveal that their Emperor is nude. AIDStruthers CANT cite a set of specific publications to prove that “HIV” tests detect active infection, and they CANTcite a set of specific publications to prove that “HIV” causes AIDS; so they try to “kill the messengers” who bring these facts to public attention.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
Google.......Kalichman disclaims and makes AD HOMONYM attacks (Does illiteracy matter? — Kalichman’s Komical Kaper #9)
" What’s really wrong with resorting to ad hominem statements — personal attacks on people you disagree with — isn’t that they’re uncivil or that they might offend someone, it’s that they are IRRELEVANT to the subject under discussion........"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee The PCR disclaimer is just under that.
PCR disclaimer....The ... AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, v1.5 is.......NOT......... intended to be used as a screening test for blood or blood products for the presence of HIV-1 or as a diagnostic test to confirm the presence of HIV-1 infection.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Do you even understand what you're saying? Do you know what these words you lifted off the Roche website mean? Do you know why they say it?
The answer is no, otherwise you would have picked up on the clinical significance of the words "screening" and "diagnostic test". It's designed for viral load testing, not diagnosis or blood screens, that's all the disclaimer means.
There aren't secret messages hidden at the bottom of websites just to taunt you.
G0lfYankee 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee yes I do. Do YOU?
PCR disclaimer....The ... AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, v1.5 is.......NOT......... intended to be used as a screening test for blood or blood products for the presence of HIV-1 or as a diagnostic test to confirm the presence of HIV-1 infection.
YOU claimed that PCR was used for diagnosing "hiv" infection. I pointed out what the test kit manufacturers claim for their own product.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Do I need to remind you of what YOU claimed? Scroll back to your comment from an hour ago. YOU claimed that the "Gold Standard" for "hiv" TESTING is an ELISA followed up by PCR. Did you "forget"?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee So.....can you NAME a scientifically valid test for "hiv" infection? You CLAIMED to be a biochemist who goes to peer reviewed science for your info. Lol...of course the only thing you referenced was McWiki.
NAME a scientifically valid test for "hiv" infection O Anonymous youtube "expert" No....shooting messengers is NOT a Gold Standard for those crap tests.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Koolybabe does not understand the dfference between direct PCR of genomic DNA and RT-PCR.
sunaru1 5 hours ago
@G0lfYankee The test kit manufacturers do NOT support your claims. What info do YOU have that they missed?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
So HIV does not cause AIDS...and AIDS is caused by injecting drugs and using chemotherapeutic drugs and u cannot get it by having sexual relations with an AIDS sufferer..did i get it right?..so i can have sex with someone with AIDS and be sure that i will not be getting sick at all since its not transmissible..right?? If i do get sick,thn if its not HIV thn what is making me sick since AIDS is not transmissible.....this doc is raising a lot of questions...clearly misleading people.
sunnysey89 2 weeks ago
@sunnysey89 "Aids" as defined how? There are about a dozen different definitions.
If you have sex with someone who is sick with something infectious then you can catch it. "Aids" never left the original "risk groups" of nearly 28 years ago so that means "aids" isnt infectious. Infectious things spread.
Google....There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit
"“Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits”, The Independent announced on June 8, 2008.."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 weeks ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny I get it. AIDS worries you. You don't want there to be an incurable infectious STD to be a part of the world you live in, so you cope with it by pretending it doesn't exist.
You create a world where there's an elaborate conspiracy where the thousands of scientists studying HIV (including all the new students who got their PhDs in the last 20 years) are in on it and out to get you. You've turned a threat you can't do anything about into one you can.
G0lfYankee 2 days ago
@G0lfYankee Honey....you need to stop getting "your" ideas from internet drug marketers.
Playing "Dr" Phil with skeptics is NOT scientific evidence. Concordance is a demonstrable liar so I'm not interested in you trying to pass off crap you found on his videos as "your" ideas.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 days ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Why do you keep going on about C0nc0rdance? I've never mentioned him once, but you seem obsessed.
Also, I'm not playing "Dr Phil", I'm playing Dr G0lfYankee. I'm a biomedical scientist, fucktard. Drug companies get their ideas from me, not the other way around. I get my information from the same place as any respectable scientist -- peer-reviewed journals and the original research conducted by myself and my colleagues.
G0lfYankee 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Lol...because I've dealt with you VMD cultists before, you have a video of his on your channel and you are practically copy pasting his ideas.
Honey...the original research was found to be TOTALLY fraudulent and impossible to repeat or verify during the TWO US gov. investigations into the matter. You have offered ZERO scientific evidence for your beliefs. It's just one logical fallacy after another with you people
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee I go to experts with identities and credentials I can easily verify thanks. You haven't offered up any science and you CLAIMING to be a scientist doesn't excuse all your logical fallacies that you present INSTEAD of any peer reviewed science.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee These are the alleged "hiv" proteins....... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160
as "discovered" By Gallo ha ha and those are the proteins.........ALL..........the so-called "hiv" tests revolve around. Um...WHEN exactly did Gallo actually make a Direct isolation of this alleged VMD out of someone allegedly dying of it in order to scientifically validate those tests?
Title Date and Journal
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Are the test kit manufacturers "conspiring" against their own products? Lol...isn't it "funny" the info concordance excludes from his videos? I have the direct links to the test kit disclaimers on my channel under the profile pic.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 days ago
@sunnysey89 What specifically did you find "misleading"?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 weeks ago
@sunnysey89 AIDS is not a virus, it cannot be transmitted. It is the breakdown of immune system caused by stress (AIDS drugs, poppers, malnutrition, etc.).
dz1ncha 1 week ago 2
@dz1ncha And you know this because you've read all 1,743,638 papers published on HIV/AIDS in the last 20 years and have concluded, despite the opinions of hundreds of thousands of qualified scientists, that everyone is wrong.
Then you submit your hypothesis about 'stress' based on the zero original research you've done, propose no mechanism, make no predictions and call it a job well done - *claps slowly* - congratulations! You've just disproved science! What will you do next?
G0lfYankee 2 days ago
@G0lfYankee NAME the peer reviewed scientific reference the dissident have been asking for. Lol...go as the anonymous youtube "scientist" for it :P
It isn't up to skeptics to do your homework for you. "Proof" by consensus and "proof" by assertion are not science no matter what some internet drug marketers would have you beleeeve lol
mykoolaidtastesfunny 2 days ago
@sunnysey89 I agree. If Peter Douchebag is so convinced HIV is neither infectious nor the cause of AIDS, how's about he tests his theory on himself and rids us all of his stupidity.
G0lfYankee 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Lol...let me guess...."You" think he should INJECT himself right?
You need to stop getting "your" ideas from UNqualified internet drug marketers honey. You CANT inject yourself with something that doesn't exist. You can't inject yourself with demons either.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee Google........The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia
"who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?
A dozen people who include a graduate student (Ken Witwer), a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials (Martin Delaney......), and a PhD in a NON-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman) Yet these people say Mullis and Duesberg aren’t qualified to talk about HIV/AIDS because they’ve never done research on it!"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
@G0lfYankee See on youtube........Living Proof The Lindsey Nagel Story
Cheryl and Lindsey Nagel on the Robert Scott Bell Show. How does a 2 week old HIV+ Romanian adoptee (circa 1990) become a healthy 19 year old in 2009? Hint: NO HIV DRUGS. Cheryl Nagel joins me for her first interview since House of Numbers was released to share a story that cannot be told in the HIV-worshipping mainstream media. Lindsey Nagel is alive today precisely because of Peter Duesbergs intervention.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 day ago
Heroin / cocaine / opium use has been around for ages. Why, then, is AIDS relatively new?
sunaru1 3 weeks ago
@Katkinsful's retarded sockpuppet.....Did you "forget"? There is no "new" disease. It's just a bunch of old diseases lumped together using Gallo's crap antibody test.
You're soooooo "forgetful"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 3 weeks ago
so basically if you have HIV then get a bad illness after that.. it progresses to aids? if this is the case, then hiv does still cause aids. certainly getting the flu won't cause AIDS.. this aids conspiracy seems like wishful thinking
ilyA7x 3 weeks ago
Can someone please tell me why this hasn't been brought to the public eye? I am an 18 year old high school student who has very little training in any sort of advanced chemistry or retroviruses but this seems like 100% solid evidence that would suggest that our previous view on HIV causing AIDS is in fact wrong? Why aren't we being educated on this?
TurdFerguson198 4 weeks ago
@TurdFerguson198 Picture the lawsuits for 5 minutes.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 3 weeks ago
@TurdFerguson198 Because this video is dishonest and uses the technique of 'cherry- picking'.
sunaru1 3 weeks ago
@Kaktinsful's retarded sockpuppet....You are "projecting" Katkinsful's sockpuppet
Did you "forget" all the crap you already tried here?
on youtube.......'HIV test a crime, AIDS 'cure' killed a whole generation'
ha now here.....HIV tests are the biggest scam!!!
You're sooooooo "forgetful" ha ha
mykoolaidtastesfunny 3 weeks ago
funny but, why we can't american scientists talking about this matter? Well, what country makes most money of HIV?
RonaldBarone 2 months ago
I have never been tested and never will. Just eat right, take the right nutrients, like how God Created the World with nature and natural supplements and you will be fine..Of course there are 10000000s of Viruses out there and Bacteria, so all these so called Machines that test are all FAKE! We all know the Pharmaceutical Companies love to make money and this is this there business, or else they wouldnt be getting a paycheck, would they?
GeoGR78 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
everyone must drink methanol, otherwise all of you will die lol
discouniverse 2 months ago
More information on HIV/AIDS at PozLikeMe com
hojpub 2 months ago
you opppl are really fucking dumb take the meds now and we will return back to the 80s with ppl with all sorts of deceases appearing suddenly s side effect of hiv, i can have problems in my imuno but not have aids because i havent got hiv its hiv thats pushes more and more for other deceases as the body gets weaker nd weaker
ukusapillage 3 months ago
futher more i was a heroin user and i do not had aids because i never caught hiv drugs can cause problems and imuno suppresant deceases but not cancer or aids itself cases are rare if not existent at all this vid is not only dangerous its bullshit
ukusapillage 3 months ago
i bet all these ppl who fight to make hiv and ais a lie do not have hiv if they had they would open their eyes and take the meds to make the viral load low, i lived next to ppl with hiv and the meds worked binging the viral load down, yes magic has hiv witch can cause aids ppl with good body defenses and good genes last longer thats just it, many other deceases can cause cancer or imune problems and hiv is one of those virus
ukusapillage 3 months ago
@ukusapillage Magic doesn't admit to taking any of the "lifesaving" meds. He just cashes the checks
google.....The Magic Effect: How to Push Drugs Without Taking Them Yourself
" Asked why he stopped and what AIDS drugs he was taking, Johnson responded in well-practiced Glaxo-speak: “The medication that I take is a decision that my doctors and I make.”
Magic’s didn’t start pushing AIDS into the black community until GlaxoSmithKline paid millions of dollars for Magic to push Combivir........"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 3 months ago 3
this is wrong, sarcosi dosent appear in young ppl normally so if it does they usually have hiv, what hiv does is open to the door for other virus and deceases, i aggre that pharma industry makes loads and do not nwant a cure theres cure already ismade with goat blood goats have the best imune sistem of all living animals, hiv can cause aids or suppressant imuno deceases
ukusapillage 3 months ago
Bull shit. HIV kills the CD4 T cells that are responsible for defending the human body. The people that has HIV but not AIDS is a temporary phase, a matter of time, when the virus population increase and the CD4 count lows bellow 250 the person is in very danger of appearing the opportunistic diseases. This video is BULL SHIT. HIV will cause aids (if not treated) to every person its a matter of time. Taking anti-retroviral drugs, the CD4 goes high and viral load goes down. PERIOD.
sacaneichonbr 4 months ago
@sacaneichonbr "Proof" by assertion is logical fallacy NOT evidence. If YOU have the primary peer reviewed scientific reference the dissident scientists have been looking for feel free to share.....Title Date and Journal.
Feel free to post it to my feature video....Why I Quit Hiv with Kary Mullis - Rodney Richards - more HoN
I block after 3 logical fallacies though so you may want to brush up on what they are first.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 4 months ago
@sacaneichonbr Google..... 20 Unanswerable Questions for AIDS Inc.
#5. Why do most individuals with low CD4 counts....NOT.... develop AIDS-defining illnesses (11, 12)?
#8. Why does "viral load" account for only 4% of the change in CD4 count cell loss in HIV-positive asymptomatics (15)?
#20. Why have improvements in "virological responses" ("viral load" and CD4 counts) to HAART ....NOT......translated into decreased clinical progression to AIDS and death (31)?
scroll down 4 refs
mykoolaidtastesfunny 4 months ago
Jesus says go through all the world and preach the Gospel. This vid right here, is GOSPEL. Good news and TRUTH that the evil media and government are suppressing from us! Therefore many have died from lack of knowledge.
shanmnl 4 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny - of course he'd need to know a lot about HIV, the man might be the greatest expert in the field - it's what gives him power and credibility to do harm. He's thoughtful, you guys are just a little crazy and a little stupid. I don't think you can argue with crazy, so I'm signing off. Enjoy your dream world, I'll enjoy mine. You won't change my mind, I won't change yours.
dsv400 5 months ago
@dsv400 Honey....calling people names isn't scientific evidence and the burden of proof is on believers not skeptics. You get all your "scientific" info from UNqualified anonymous amatuers and internet marketers with ZERO credentials
mykoolaidtastesfunny 5 months ago
Google....Duesberg vindicated
" it’s worth noting too that Duesberg’s criticism of inflated AIDS-death numbers for South Africa, suppressed from Medical Hypotheses, has been vindicated by publication in a peer-reviewed, PubMed-abstracted journal [Medical students in Africa need not fear HIV, 2010/05/31 ; REPRINT of Galletti & Bauer, 2010/06/03]..... The UC Berkeley investigation found that the charges could not be sustained, even though the task had been delegated to an....."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 5 months ago
@dsv400 Why do you virus of mass destruction cultists not hit reply when replying to someone? Are you really that cowardly and unsure of your claims? All you ever get out of you VMD cultists is name calling and personal attacks. Lol...you're supposed to just beleeeeve in the VMD I guess.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 5 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny - I have nothing against his credentials. My issue with him is that he's a calculated, thoughtful mass murderer. Hitler had many accredited scientists building him weapons, killing people and doing awful things. Peter is a killer, you're just stupid. You still haven't told me where you'd like to meet for your "nothing" injection.
dsv400 5 months ago
@dsv400 Lol.....honey...libelling someone with Baseless accusations doesn't change the science. Making up lies about someone does not address his points.
Do you not understand what a peer reviewed scientific reference is?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 5 months ago
@dsv400 Duesberg is a killer? Did you know he spoke out about how dangerous AZT is? Why? Because AZT was invented in the 60's by Burroughs-Wellcome Pharmaceuticals as a cancer chemotherapeutic agent, but found that it was too hazardous to be used as such. Only when the HIV/AIDS scare came along, was Burroughs-Wellcome able to take it back off the shelf and relabel it as a treatment for AIDS, therefore recouping the money they lost on AZT development and testing in the 60's. AZT is the killer.
arnold02000 4 months ago
@jffryfnt science is about. It is about the ability to freely publish and discuss your findings. That is how we go forward in science. Until proven what you are saying is theory. And everyone else should be allowed to put their point of view forward without being called childish names, having their research cancelled, and alienated. It is NOT fully proven and in science you cant do anything on a hunch. IT HAS TO BE ACCURATE. Gallo was already a fraud, and Faucci became a multi millionaire.
sasawells 5 months ago
Peter Duesberg is awful. His german accent and credentials and vocabulary give him a false air of intelligence and authority, but he is a racist, homophobic mass murderer. AIDS and HIV is not a hoax.
wikipedia(dot)org/wiki/Peter_Duesberg
dsv400 5 months ago
@dsv400 Google....The unqualified (= without qualifications) gurus of Wikipedia
You unbelievably gullible tit. What have you got against actual scientists? — Dr. Peter Duesberg, PhD, Professor of Molecular Biology, University of California, member, National Academy of Sciences, first to map the genetic structure of retroviruses. Five-time recipient of the National Institutes of Health’s Outstanding Investigator Grant.
If he isn't highly credentialed then who is?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 5 months ago
@dsv400 Google....Duesberg Vindicated
Tough shit honey. Duesberg has been proven correct. Past tense. We've been lied to (again) there is no virus of mass destruction
“Peter Duesberg knows more about retroviruses than any man alive.”
Dr. Robert Gallo, co-discoverer of HIV
google....IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW” SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 5 months ago
I have listen to the comments of Doctor Peter, but he does not say why in Africa there is so many cases of Aids although drug use and homosexuality is low comparing to western countries?
jucaepalanga 5 months ago
@jucaepalanga If you've listened then how is that you think he ever said "aids" in Africa has anything to do with drug abuse or homosexuality? Why do you think just being gay is a problem at all instead of the drug abuse? I suspect you didn't really listen at all.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 5 months ago
@jucaepalanga In Africa the problem is poverty btw....people who can't afford enough food or clean water or going to get sick and die.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 5 months ago
people cannot think freely anymore. they are educated not to do so. they only listen to the media. this is all abt making money not abt science,
footyclub1 8 months ago 8
so magic jhonson dont have hiv
jzndjs 8 months ago 6
@jzndjs unless he ever did cocaine
SlapstickCoyote 2 months ago
of course there can't be an HIV specific disease. it weakens your immune system and then anything can attack you. what a retarded argument. AIDS isn't a single disease - it is an acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
SoHoTandCool 9 months ago
@SoHoTandCool You have no evidence for the claim that "hiv" weakens the immune system. "Proof" be assertion is a logical fallacy not evidence. If YOU have the primary peer reviewed scientific papers which prove the existence of Gallo's alleged virus of mass destruction and linked it to immune problems feel free to post the reference to my featured video....Why I Quit Hiv with Kary Mullis - Rodney Richards - more HoN
Three logical fallacies and you're out
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny And how many logical fallacies could I possibly enumerate in your response?? Ugh...'You have no evidence'? "Proof" be assertion [sic] is a logical fallacy not evidence? What the @$#% is a 'primary' peer reviewed scientific paper which 'prove' the, save your rant: the HIV virus..and it's consequences on the immune system...your whole rant is fraught with fallacies, and YOU are the purveyor of all that is logical??? 3X's your out?? You are #$%#$ing DELUDED.
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt The burden of proof is on believers not skeptics. Look it up if you don't believe me.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny If I could logically 'dis-believe' it I would. What you fail to realize, in your highly un-skeptical state of psychosis, is that you are parading around in a disingenuous charade that there is no scientific evidence for HIV. YET, at the same time, claim to require the standard of scientific evidence when it exists. How convenient for you to APPEAL TO IGNORANCE. IF you were skeptical, you could find the evidence.
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt Lol...sweetie...diagnosing me isn't a scientific reference and would be highly unethical to do online even IF you were qualified to render such diagnosis.
I AM skeptical but it isn't up to me to go find your evidence for you. The burden of proof is on believers NOT skeptics. Seriously....I'm not kidding. Google.....BURDEN OF PROOF
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny It IS up to you, if you are going to make the boisterous claims that you are. You are not skeptical at all I know the evidence, I've read the evidence. There's THOUSANDS of scientific, peer-reviewed papers on the subject, and you claim they don't exist? That can ONLY happen with will-full ignorance darling. And please, don't tell me to google anything,k? Google isn't going to save you nor your ignorant position.
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt No honey....the burden of proof is always on believers not skeptics. You don't get to re-write the rules of logical to accommodate your virus of mass destruction cult.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You're not a skeptic. You are a LIAR. What's in this for you? Are you seriously going to keep pretending the evidence isn't there? Go to the Science webpage, or Nature, or PNAS, JEM, JI, Immunology, etc etc etc, and search HIV and/or AIDS, they will list the references of the scientific journal articles they have published on the subject. Your ignorance is a disease. Go to PubMed. Stop playing ignorant!
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt Dude....WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
WHAT evidence!?!?!??! Lol....WOW....good thing I'm not holding my breath waiting. NONE of you virus of mass destruction cultists can ever actually name any. You just yap about how much of it there is lol
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny ummm...have you ever like done, a science project in school? or even any like, research project? do you KNOW what a scientific journal article is? can you name any scientific journals? do you know the difference between credible ones and ones that are not? are you fluent in critical analysis with regards to information? I sincerely suspect not, because anyone with any of the above skills know with a higher degree of confidence,what indeed we know to be facts in this reality
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt Yes and I know that an experiment that can't be independently verified is a pile of crap.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@jffryfnt Why are you dodging your burden of proof?
And.....since you work so hard to avoid naming the appropriate reference that the dissident scientists have been asking for.....I suspect you know it's all big lie too so....WHY the fuck are you defending Gallo's three legged dog of a theory?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny ????? What?? I'm trying to tell you how to find the info!!! How much more clearly do I need to spell it out for you?? Oh so how true that old saying goes: you can lead a horse to water...
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt Dude....don't act stupid. You've done nothing but call me names for asking. Also did you "forget"?
We;ve been over this many times on many videos. It is NOT up to me to go find your evidence for you and the burden of proof is on believers NOT skeptics. Seriously....wtf
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny tard...just because you haven't seen it, doesn't mean it does not exist. and that's the card you're playing. frankly, whatever has happened to corrupt your mind into thinking what you do, but let me remind you that you are representative of a disparate fringe and barely insignificant bunch,of deniers, and you mock those that are truly skeptical. The evidence exists, it's published. That's where there is a SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS that HIV is real, and it causes AIDS.
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt Omg....STILL?!!?? You're STILL yapping about alll this mysterious frikkin evidence? Consensus is politics not science. Voting isn't going to make the imaginary real. Wtf? Look at your comments....one evasion after another. You may as well be yelling "AMEN" over and over again
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Sorry 'someonepissedinyourkoolaid', I'm kinda thinking that you perhaps has AIDs, or someone close to you..And you're desperate to find an alternative explanation. Because otherwise, I don't know what possibly could explain your delusions. Someone must have dropped a lot of apples on your head before you finally acknowledged that gravity is a theory, and is real. HIV, is real. AIDS, is real. And I KNOW you know that.
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt Dude....will you stop with the Dr Phil crap? That isn't scientific evidence. Nobody disputes the existence of immune problems so where you get this "aids is real" I'm sure I don't know. Who is disputing that? NO....I do NOT believe in something even the "discoverers" never actually found. I don't beleeeeve in body thetans either.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You are literally a garbage information harvester of the internet. All you have is empty rhetoric and a completely defiant attitude towards the 'system'. You're a cynic. If not, much anything less than a flat-Earther. It must take a lot of energy to perform such willful ignorance such that you display so poignantly. In fact, I think you just need a 'conspiracy' in your life in an attempt to make yourself feel important. Bad choice, the evidence is stacked against you.
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt Lol....what did I just say? Attacking people is NOT a scientific reference. WHAT evidence you ridiculous ass?!?!?!@?@??@
Lol....all you do is yap about aalllll this evidence but never actually present any
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@jffryfnt Do you work for fifa, or are you working for gadaffi, maybe a bank. I hate to tell you this but after working for western governments and banks, you need to understand that some organisations are corrupt. South Africa is receiving a lot of money from the global fund by exaggerating aids. They are also the only country who is opposing the Libyans who have had their money stolen from them. WHY? because they also get a lot of money from Gadaffi. It is £1.5 billion a year.
sasawells 5 months ago
@sasawells Just because of the mere existence of corruption doesn't presume that the science is corrupt. The evidence is detailed in the scientific literature. Obviously, anyone who subscribes to HIV/AIDS denialism is literally scientifically inept. I do biomedical research in a not-for-profit scientific institution, namely tuberculosis research--of which most people with AIDS, especially in Africa, will die from opportunistic TB infections.
jffryfnt 5 months ago
@jffryfnt If you are an expert on tubercolosis, you will realise that the main reason it appears is due to malnutrition, and oxiditive stress. That with weight loss, and diarrhea is an AIDS diagnosis in Africa. WITHOUT any diagnosis of HIV. How can you defend that as science. In the Ethiopia famine, it would have been an Aids crisis as well as a famine. Only HIV was not mainstream media at the time. It is not and never has been a pandemic in the western world. This is from the WHO .
sasawells 5 months ago
@sasawells First of all,you have to realize that the main reason it 'appears',is because you are bloody infected. We live in a very dog eat dog world and the ONLY reason that you have such an evolved immune system is because of the millions of years that we've co-evolved...with pathogens.Otherwise, we wouldn't have an immune system. HIV infects CD4 T cells.An unhealthy T-cell stands a much less chance in resisting infection if it is malnourished, obviously.Cells need nutrition.What else you got?
jffryfnt 5 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny On a side note, have you ever heard of the 'Berlin patient'?
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt Talking about HIV and pubmed. HIV was cured a while ago. If it was a disease. It was cured by boosting the immune system lol. check pubmed/19031451 Immunotherapy of HIV-infected patients with Gc protein-derived macrophage activating factor (GcMAF) When this came out they hid it, and issued a statement that HIV will NEVER EVER be cured. You have to understand 50 thousand jobs and billions of pounds rely on it never being cured, and dodgy statistics from South Africa.
sasawells 5 months ago
@sasawells Um...do you know why it's not always useful to inadvertently activate 'sleeping' macrophages? Macrophages are perhaps the most active immune cell type that there is! After all, what cell type do you think cleans up EVERYTHING in your body: dead cells, DNA fragments, proteins, etc etc etc...Macrophages are NON-SPECIFIC. Apparently this article wasn't hidden too well, hence was published in the Journal of Medical Virology. And, interestingly, has only been cited ONCE.
jffryfnt 5 months ago
@jffryfnt I think you will find that the reason for this is because they dont want to investigate. There reaction was that they need to test more. They then sent out a cream tested on 45 people that they said protected you against hiv. ie 55 percent got infected instead of 70 percent. What kind of science is THAT. They dont want to know. Other research has been done on the work of Yamamoto, and they have had the same results. It should get media attention but they dont want it public. Its crazy
sasawells 5 months ago
@jffryfnt Ok Talking about DNA fragments, you do know that HIV is coded in the human genome. An ancient form, but none the less when a cell breaks down, this CELLULAR DEBRIS dna fragment breaks up and, is dispersed. There is a lot we dont know about the body. You me, Fauci or Gallo. Anyone who is arrogant enough to stand up, and say they understand it by detecting antibodies to certain proteins, has a very narrow view. To disregard everyone who contributes but their view differs is not what
sasawells 5 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You know, we GAIN knowledge through observation and experience. The scientific method is an extension of those very basic and fundamental things. But science has been elevated to a very high standard through repeated observation and repetition, and publishing those results. It doesn't matter about Gallo's first paper on the subject, because his observations have been repeated thousands of times over.
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt No sweetie....Gallo's experiment was found IMPOSSIBLE to repeat or verify by the US Gov themselves.
And what do we call something that cannot be indepdently verified? A pile of crap
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny Your only arguments come from OUTSIDE of the scientific process, e.g. quotes, documentaries, etc. Show me a paper, a statistically and methodologically sound scientific paper that disproves the thousands of scientific published articles on the subject that HIV does not cause AIDS. Hey, you want the Nobel Prize in medicine? Then why don't YOU publish the paper yourself. Perhaps you could be like that guy that 'proved' that bacteria causes ulcers...he got the Nobel Prize!
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt Sweetie.....I am asking you to meet your burden of proof. That isn't an "argument". It is a request.
If YOU believe in it then it is YOU who has the burden of proof.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny WHY are you SIDESTEPPING???????
jffryfnt 6 months ago
@jffryfnt What are you talking about? I'm still here.
Where's that evidence you claim there is just soooooooo frikkin much of lol?
The burden of proof is on believers not skeptics. Lol....NO....calling me names isn't evidence.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 months ago
You freakin wackjobs that think AIDS is not real, YOU LIE BASTARDS!!!!!!!!
padude64 10 months ago
These peiople are idiots and want to get rid of gay people! Wont happen here! How can you be so damn stupid!
padude64 10 months ago
Aids isnt real is what I got out of this but Hiv is real and very dangerous? please explain I want to try and learn
DeWiz001 10 months ago
@DeWiz001 No...immune problems exist they just can't be caused by any pàrticular virus of mass destruction for the reasons stated.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 10 months ago
“[Aids] is not ‘God’s wrath’ or any other absurdity. A segment of our society was experimenting with their lifestyle, and it didn’t work. They got sick. Another segment of our pluralistic society, call them doctor/scientist refugees from the failed War on Cancer, or just call them professional jackals, discovered that it did work. It worked for them. They are still making payments on their new BMWs out of your pocket.”
mykoolaidtastesfunny 11 months ago 2
quote is from an expert with an identity and credentials that are easily verified..... Dr. Kary Mullis, PhD, Biochemist, Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for inventing PCR the basis for the HIV viral load tests
for more google....IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW” SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
And see "House of Numbers Excerpt" on youtube
mykoolaidtastesfunny 11 months ago
i think the hiv=aids belief is purely religious thats why all the emotion in defending it. a brother of mine tested positive in '94 and and never got sick until he started taking the drugs in '01 but some1 told him and convinced him to stop after a year of being sick but after stopping he got better and four years later he tested negative. he tested again over and over thinking it was a mistake but still negative he's married now and has a two year old daughter. he thinks its a miracle..duh..
azraelblame 11 months ago
hi!! i just wanna thank you for this videos they really opened my eyes :) not the way that you espected tho hehe XD...jokes a side i gotta say i really wish this was true because it's not fair how some people "get" aids just cuz they had sex with someone and they have to spend theire whole life paying the price :( i really don't know what to belive anymore but i wish "mykoolaidtastesfunny" and "jffryfnt" could help me clear some doubts about both sides ok :) thank you again
erixander1234 11 months ago
You have to remember that Magic was thrown to the political lions in 1991 with his HIV test. Magic Johnson is a JOCK and an entertainer, he didn't like the political heat then, so he became very quite for several years. Unlike Tommy Morrison, who has gone public about the disputes against HIV/AID$ and the toxic drugs, Magic smiles with that S@#$ eating grin and sells the drug program with his fried chicken. He probably DID take HIV meds ONE TIME and ONE dose. He is paid performer now.
WillSee11 11 months ago
Google....IS A POSITIVE WESTERN BLOT PROOF OF HIV INFECTION?
Papadopulos-Eleopulos, E., Turner, V. F. & Papadimitriou, J. M. Bio/technology 11, 696-707 (1993)
"The available evidence indicates that: (a) the antibody tests are..NOT...standardised... because NO GLD STANDARD has been used and may not even exist to determine specificity, a positive WB may represent nothing more than cross‑reactivity with the many non‑HIV antibodies present in AIDS patients ..."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
To confirm their complaints I have the direct link to an "hiv" test kit diclaimer on my channel under the pic of the Pope
"“At present there is NO recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood.” (Abbott labs HIV-1/2 test,)
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
Google....The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia
"So, let's just take a look at who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?
A dozen people who include a graduate student (Ken Witwer), a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials (Martin Delaney, Nathan Geffen, Gregg Gonsalves, Richard Jefferys), and a PhD in a non-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman)..."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
I thought this "poppers leads to AIDS" theory was debunked decades ago.
DCFunBud 1 year ago
@DCFunBud Nope. In fact the World Health Organization cancelled the htero ads epidemic 2 Years ago. The sndrome Gallo's crap tests wer SUPPOSED to predict did NOT spread into the general population just as Duesberg predicted.
Google....THERE WILL BE NO HETEROSEXUAL AIDS EPIDEMIC EXPERTS ADMIT
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
This is incredibly outdated
wowsdrawkcab 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab You're a cultist. You can't give ANY evidence but you still feel the need to open your yap. You know what papers are required and "NO" the rules of sceince have not changed since this was made. This is a serious topic you sad cultist....keep your idiotic faith to yourself.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab This video explain in plain English what papers are required.....Druga Strana Side 5/9
You already know that because 2 weeks ago you pulled the same culty crap on this video....Aids Hoax 10 Reasons Part 1
What is WRONG with you? Do you make your living off of Gallo's phantom virus?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab Even a creationist can give chapter and verse. You can't even give title of paper date and journal. Youi literally have ZERO evidence that Gallo's virus even exists.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab watch house of numbers, It confirms all of this
holypsychopath 1 year ago
@holypsychopath
This film merely attempts to mislead and blur the truth with quote mined interviews, while ignoring valid research (and failing to mention its own failures).
This is full of opinions and very little fact.
wowsdrawkcab 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab Duesber has been proven correct. Google...There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit
"“Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits”, The Independent announced on Sunday, June 8, 2008..... Dr. Kevin de Cock of the World Health Organization: “[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.”
“A 25-year health campaign was misplaced outside the continent of Africa,” the article concedes"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
Look at the demographics for people with HIV. Enough said about that.
Thanks for the perfect example of what the movie does... that is, quote things without appreciation or understanding what they actually mean.
BTW what does this have to do with my comment? You've linked these quotes before... they meant nothing then and they mean nothing now in this context.
wowsdrawkcab 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab Honey you claiming I misquoted does not make it true. You claimed the film is misleading an only offers opinions. That is total crap. I know you know that Duesberg has been proven correct. You're just a lying little shit
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab You sure are "forgetful"...Google....Duesberg vindicated
"In this connection, it’s worth noting too that Duesberg’s criticism of inflated AIDS-death numbers for South Africa, suppressed from Medical Hypotheses, has been vindicated by publication in a peer-reviewed, PubMed-abstracted journal [Medical students in Africa need not fear HIV, 2010/05/31 ; REPRINT of Galletti & Bauer, 2010/06/03].
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
Why did you post this? Does this mean anything without explanation?
Also is that a tick or something that you have?... putting forgetful in quotes all the time?
Bring the topic back to my comment or at least explain yourself if you want to actually make a point. You're like an excited dog playing with a bee hive that doesn't understand why it keeps getting stung.
wowsdrawkcab 1 year ago 2
@wowsdrawkcab My point is pretty clear...you're a liar and you know you're a liar because you've already had itpointed out to you before. MANY times. It isn't an honest mistake any more
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
You must not have a single mirror in your home.
Here this will be more your speed, Google "psychological projection".
Afterward, take a look at all your comments and allow astonishment to wash over you.
wowsdrawkcab 1 year ago 2
@wowsdrawkcab Honey..YOU are the one who claimed this video is nothing but opinion and misrepresentations. YOU are the one who needs to back that up. What SPECIFICALLY made you say that?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
I said why... quote mines mixed with facts leading to a different conclusion of the original quotes. People interviewed after this film came out said themselves that they were misled about the interviews and their statements were later edited to provide a contrary view.
Do you want me to list half the interviews in the film???
Don't try to defend something without knowing both sides. Its like showing up to court without knowing what you have been charged with.
wowsdrawkcab 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab Well then you're a liar. Whose quotes were misrepresented? Nobody's. WHO came out afterwards and said they were mislead? Nobody. You're a liar and you aren't being specific at all. I doubt you even watched this before opening your yap
I grew up with it in the family sweetie. I know the dogma like the back of my hand. I didn't become a skeptic from a lack of scripture.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
Montagnier for one. Take a peek at the original transcript of the interview and then compare to the parts used in the film and most importantly how they are used. My favorite is how they have him saying that a healthy immune system "will" get rid of HIV when he said "can" and he was speaking about ridding the body of the initial infection.
Well sweetie if you grew up with it in the family you must have had your eyes closed the entire time because you know half the story.
wowsdrawkcab 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab Um....WHAT original transcripts of the interviews?
Lol...BUSTED. You did NOT watch this video. You unbelievably stupid little shit.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
I just gave you an example, which you asked for. Why don't you address that? Name calling won't win this one for you.
Again, look in a mirror, take a pill and accept reality.
PS. I loved the "busted" part
wowsdrawkcab 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab Lol....I did address it. I said BUSTED. Honey...you did NOT watch this video before opening your yap. Montagnier never said anything even remotely similar in this documentary.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
It makes sense that you didn't notice it because it was taken out of context.
wowsdrawkcab 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab Lol....it was NOWHERE in THIS video. I was right...you did NOT watch it before opening your big mouth. You're just a lying little shit
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
Name the TITLE DATE AND JOURNAL of where it says I'm a lying little shit lol, you moron. Watch the video again.
wowsdrawkcab 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab Lol...YOU watch it once and tell me WHERE Montagnier said what you claim.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
Wow really lets move the goal posts some more. I've done what you wanted and threw it in your face. So, no I'm going to pass on this one, go get mommy to hold your hand or something its pro-bowl time.
wowsdrawkcab 1 year ago
@wowsdrawkcab I didn't move goalposts at all. I said name SOMETHING that supports our claim that the interviewees were taken out of context etc and that shows you actually watched the vide before opening your mouth
You then quoted a totally different documentary which shows I was right...you never bothered to watch THIS video before offering an opinion on it.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago