Listen to Casadesus if you want to hear this music played on the piano. He knew how to play his music, even though he was 6 generations removed from the tradition.
This was indeed expressive playing of beautiful music, but I find it sad that purism could get in the way of FrostPegasus' enjoyment of great music. I love baroque music on the 'proper' instruments as well, and there is the added interest of wondering how close to the sounds of the time it comes. But this is an intellectual activity, and music can transcend all this - if it is allowed to.
Expressive, thoughtful, and beautiful playing of these wonderful pieces. What a marvelous selection for a New York concert! As a pianist I studied and played Rameau for years with great satisfaction and reward. I believe his work transposes well to the modern piano, similar to Scarlatti, without his distinctive voice or unique style being lost. And the genius of Rameau is thrilling like none other. It would be a shame for pianists to miss it.
why is Rameau so charming &interesting where i cant grasp most of Couperin and allthose agrements.Hough is wonderful in much repertoire.Sokolov is another entire independent world in Rameau.Very pianistic and wholly imaginative. Maybe more pianists will start playing this French rep instead of the Scarlatti and Bach we always get.
amazing this intimate music but Hough knows how to do it in a large hall.Clever chap!
He plays the gigue in a very strange way, though, I think. It would be quite impossible to dance a gigue to this music, with it being this slow. It's very beautiful played, but the way he's doing it, it's not quite a gigue anymore. Though maybe it says something like très lentement in the score, I don't know, but I doubt it, to be honest.
@fredrikhildebrand I think that even in Rameau's time that instrumental pieces were named AFTER dance forms and not necessarily appropriate for the dance but for listening in the Salon, or Court, and the listener would have the dance simply suggested by the piece. Yes, of course it would be impossible to truly dance a Gigue to this piece. But that's not what it was intended for.
@fredrikhildebrand It always astounds me when I hear these kinds of comments, about how it would be difficult or "impossible" to dance whatever dance the composer is displaying. These pieces, like the movements of a Bach Suite, are not supposed to be brought to the dance hall or to the court, although many can. They are KEYBOARD pieces IN THE STYLE OF those dances. Yes, composers take some freedom with traditional tempos at times. Good Lord!
The first two pieces are the Gigue and Tambourin from "Pièces de clavecin" from 1724. I think the third one is "Les Tendres Plaintes" from the Suite in D minor, but he is playing it with so much ornamentation that I am not sure. I think it is beautiful, though.
Totally misses the point, like Gould.
Listen to Casadesus if you want to hear this music played on the piano. He knew how to play his music, even though he was 6 generations removed from the tradition.
elfpix 1 month ago
Can anybody give the titles of these pieces?:)
d3o1r0i3n1a989 8 months ago
what's the name of that rameau piece with all of the percussion and so on, it's quite fast, vivace maybe, and it ends with a big percussion hit.
: \ that's the best way I can describe it.
MadelieneG 9 months ago
This was indeed expressive playing of beautiful music, but I find it sad that purism could get in the way of FrostPegasus' enjoyment of great music. I love baroque music on the 'proper' instruments as well, and there is the added interest of wondering how close to the sounds of the time it comes. But this is an intellectual activity, and music can transcend all this - if it is allowed to.
thecatsman 1 year ago
Comment removed
thecatsman 1 year ago
Wonderful playing!!
georgerannie 1 year ago
Expressive, thoughtful, and beautiful playing of these wonderful pieces. What a marvelous selection for a New York concert! As a pianist I studied and played Rameau for years with great satisfaction and reward. I believe his work transposes well to the modern piano, similar to Scarlatti, without his distinctive voice or unique style being lost. And the genius of Rameau is thrilling like none other. It would be a shame for pianists to miss it.
The4747Mark 1 year ago
Comment removed
pearsewl 1 year ago 2
why is Rameau so charming &interesting where i cant grasp most of Couperin and allthose agrements.Hough is wonderful in much repertoire.Sokolov is another entire independent world in Rameau.Very pianistic and wholly imaginative. Maybe more pianists will start playing this French rep instead of the Scarlatti and Bach we always get.
amazing this intimate music but Hough knows how to do it in a large hall.Clever chap!
lovesGenet 1 year ago
Lovely Playing ...I keep coming home to this gem...
shela2 3 years ago 2
very beautiful but honestly I like the harpsichord version better
jella11 3 years ago
I hope someone will post his j.n. Hummel performances
-----------------------------
Rolf, Netherlands.
I am a collector of classical 78's and lp's
Click "otterhouse" above to see (and hear!)
some of my collection.
otterhouse 3 years ago
You play it the way you feel it. Otherwise, music becomes senseless!
fullargon 3 years ago
This is lovely. The 1st time I've heard it on a Piano. My recording is on Harpsichord
elton1981 4 years ago 2
He plays the gigue in a very strange way, though, I think. It would be quite impossible to dance a gigue to this music, with it being this slow. It's very beautiful played, but the way he's doing it, it's not quite a gigue anymore. Though maybe it says something like très lentement in the score, I don't know, but I doubt it, to be honest.
Very well played, though. Extremely beautiful.
fredrikhildebrand 4 years ago 9
@fredrikhildebrand I think that even in Rameau's time that instrumental pieces were named AFTER dance forms and not necessarily appropriate for the dance but for listening in the Salon, or Court, and the listener would have the dance simply suggested by the piece. Yes, of course it would be impossible to truly dance a Gigue to this piece. But that's not what it was intended for.
IMO
LazlosPlane 1 year ago
@fredrikhildebrand It always astounds me when I hear these kinds of comments, about how it would be difficult or "impossible" to dance whatever dance the composer is displaying. These pieces, like the movements of a Bach Suite, are not supposed to be brought to the dance hall or to the court, although many can. They are KEYBOARD pieces IN THE STYLE OF those dances. Yes, composers take some freedom with traditional tempos at times. Good Lord!
LazlosPlane 6 months ago
The first two pieces are the Gigue and Tambourin from "Pièces de clavecin" from 1724. I think the third one is "Les Tendres Plaintes" from the Suite in D minor, but he is playing it with so much ornamentation that I am not sure. I think it is beautiful, though.
MNYCNY 4 years ago
The third piece is the Sarabande in A from the Nouvelle Suites.
luxapollo 4 years ago
What's the name of this piece ?
adistar 4 years ago
It is from Hebe, yes.
Bachsoboe 4 years ago
i first heard that on [2 gutiar]...and it was great just like this one
shambach 4 years ago
great
BLESHER 4 years ago
I think Rameau reworked it in his opera Les Fetes d'Hébé, also named Tambourin
jjsoetekouw 4 years ago
Thanks
greatcthulu 4 years ago
I'm trying to find the orchestral version of what he plays in the middle.
Does anyone know what it's called.
greatcthulu 4 years ago
great interpretation
gudesuppes 4 years ago