911 pentagon video explanation - 1 of 3

[molitor2005]

What "plane" is that @7:19 heading towards the South Tower? It doesn't look like a commercial plane. I've never seen this particular clip of that "plane" before. I've seen videos where the plane is black, or it is blue, or it is grey. But I've never seen this clip & this "plane" does NOT look like a civilian airliner at all.  Has anyone else noticed this?

[Laxr413]

@molitor2005 i must say each video i have seen the plane looks different, but i sort of peg that to the lighting of the plane.

[steviemcsteve]

I love that it starts off by taking a quote completely out of context. If you actually look up what the guy saysliterally just before the cruise missile quote you'll kknow what he actually saw. "I looked out my window I saw this plane, a jet, this american airlines jet coming" watch?v=7PTRsuRao7A

[maulcs]

This guy's logic fucking blows.

[jkrush28]

I don't deny his ideas, just his logic. It is flawed. He does not follow the classical laws of logic established by the Greeks over 2,000 years ago. Assumptions are not logic. Logic demands that experts in physics, metallurgy, structural engineering, architecture, electrical engineering, and aerospace science analyze what happened on that day. Amateurs with a political agenda or financial motivation must be viewed with as much skepticism as they view the official explanation.

[gamesbok]

'Logic demands that experts in physics, metallurgy, structural engineering, architecture, electrical engineering, and aerospace science analyze what happened on that day.'

They have done, and they're not happy.

[jizzmonger]

@gamesbok

You UK dwellers are some real stupid fucks when it comes to 911 aint ya.

[tabithabrowne]

David von Kleist is AMAZING.

It's easy to take him seriously.

[jizzmonger]

@tabithabrowne

You UK dwellers are some real stupid fucks when it comes to 911 aint ya.

[canaansales]

@jizzmonger

I think your user ID says a lot about how seriously we should take your comments.

[jizzmonger]

@canaansales I think the fact that you are a Truther says a lot about how seriously we should take your comments.

[imRyRy]

@jizzmonger He provides facts, intellect, and knowledge. Your counterarguments are personal, immature, insults. Until you provide logic in your arguments, your comments are invalid.

[jizzmonger]

@imRyRy "He provides facts, intellect, and knowledge"

LOL

[imRyRy]

@jizzmonger I rest my case.

[jizzmonger]

@imRyRy "I rest my anus"

I bet it needs it after all that 911 Truth you have been passing.

[charliemouse123]

It is never safe to assume anything and even less safe to follow a train of thought based on an assumption and conclude your assumptions have become facts.

[kksiala]

Dumb question...if it wasnt a plane then what happened to the actual flight and all the passengers ?

[snorlax140]

This is kind of disturbing

[uakhter1]

it wolud make sense if the plane was like diagonal and half was above the pentagon

[demonoid1024]

As stated, only 1 testimony accounts for what happened on 911, in rush hour, on major highways at 9am-10am.

Surely more people saw more on the highway of the Taxi driver, somebody must have saw or heard something, or was this road closed off..?

Unless all people are blind in washington DC, this account cannot be accessibly be trusted on.

This was rush hour, and this highway should have been packed.

[kmcl11]

makes sense. It is scary that the pentagon issue was never dealt with. Everone was focused on New Yeok and sadly I am now hearing about this pentagon thing.I dont get how this happened and few ppl mentioned it. NowBush , cheney, rumsfeld walk away.

[dreadnaught2]

Flight 77 buzzed over a 4 lane highway full of cars crawling during rush hour in a city of over 500,000 people. Hundreds of people saw the 757 going down and dozens witnessed the direct impact, some from as close as 100 yards.

Until troofers can address this reality they will remain in the dark corners of youtube as they have for 7 years.

[citizensrightsmatter]

Fuk me the hole was small!!!!!

[WestCoastBeards]

#1, they just compared a building that is mainly built of cement to buildings that were primarly built of steel and glass. #2, if you noticed, when they were talking about the book and stool and computer and stuff not being damaged, it is because it didn't burn thru the wall, the wall came down when they started clean up. there is no possible way the wall could have fallen down straight from front to back

[jrkapus35]

WTF is wrong with all of u dumb asses. Ur taking americas greatest tradgety and calling it conspirecy. Yes some things dont add up but why would the us goverment kill millions of its citzen by blowing up the trade towers and why would the muslim and asma binladin agree to say they did it. The other side of this conspircy story doesnt make sense either.

[chadwic575]

NUM.1 millions of people did not die on 9/11

NUM.2 they did it to start a New World Order and put a microchip in everyone to record everyone's actions to reduce the amount of crime committed. they " sacrificed" those 3,000 innocent people for what they think is the greater good.THEY WILL FAIL because The Resistance is growing stronger every day. Praise be to Yahweh

[kmcl11]

chad, so what was the purpose of using a missile for the pentagon and not a plane?

[AlexEXE]

Go and google Operation Northwoods

[jtg09]

there had to be an bomb in the pentagon its either that or the highjackers had an bomb wit them and blew up the plane right when it when in

[kmcl11]

there had to be an bomb in the pentagon its either that or the highjackers had an bomb wit them and blew up the plane right when it when in " Really? Yet there was sucha small hole with untouched desks and papers?HA

[watnotch]

STAPHYSAGRIA 200c.

To be taken 'nationwide'...

Don't understand?

Google it : STAPHYSAGRIA 200c.

and 'the worm will turn'.

[nick11094]

alright don't get me wrong but these videos are pretty convincining but the question that is still on my mind is, if American Airlines Flight 77 didn't crash into the Pentagon then where did it go? ATC radar and recordings would have charted this. Did it just vanish into thin air yeah right

[Kenzofeis]

There was a C-130 (or EC-130) on it's tail, few witnesses even mention this - but the Pentagon admitted it after over a month.

That 130 circled the Pentagon and shot upwards again and went west, to Shanksville.

[timmyk1985]

like ive said before...its the pentagon. its probably built to withstand military grade assaults, how can you even compare the damage a plane made on the towers to the pentagon? this is stupid

[aweston916]

What happens when an airplane hits a concrete wall? Copy and paste that phrase into the search box above, then tell me we're supposed to find much of a jet left inside the Pentagon. You morons.

[Atom1cWedg1e]

Well, look at the Concorde that crashed into an Hotel. They found enough pieces of that aircraft.

[nlacia]

as someone who was in the military for six years, i have seen a jet slam into an airstrip at .85 mach (650 MPH) this is about 110 MPH faster than this "plane" was supposed to be going, and there was debris on the airstrip. distinguishable parts of the airplane were still intact. the pilot was incinerated, but there were pieces of the aircraft. so this larger plane going at a slower speed just fucking vanished? use your head, man.

[timmyk1985]

nlacia, you need to research this subject a bit more before you comment...there was bits and pieces scattered everywhere, even sheet metal with an A/A symbol on it

[canaansales]

@timmyk1985 The Pentagon, probably the most protected buiding in the world, doesn't have video surveillance of the plane's approach and crash?? And if they do, why not release that video and put all of this speculation to rest? Wake up and smell the cordite, timmy.

[kyleisdaman]

Is it a coincidence that DICK was in charge of NORAD that day, NORAD was commanded by high-ranking generals, never has a defense agency like NORAD been taken command by someone outside of military control, yet DICK has it prior to that day, 4 failed interceptions the same day, note that no interceptor was on scene within the whole event, he knew there was a something headed for the pentagon, but refuses to make the order, and decoy mock missions to confuse the actual fighters out that day, DICK!

[futbolequis]

9/11- was planned by the american government!

Pentagon- was not hit by a Boeing 757

Twins Towers- were taken down by inside explosives

those are the facts!

[jashoda1]

8:30..."is the smoke and heat damage consistent with that ammount of fuel"(yet again speculative) Has Mr.vonKleist even ignited ANY ammount of fuel for study? Let alone "8600gal"?

[jashoda1]

08:00..."pages arn't even singed." Apparently he retrieved this book himself. Either that or has has extream visual perception with reguards to photographs. Moreover, basically what he is saying is that EVERY fire that has EVER happened completly burned EVERYTHING. I think not.

[canaansales]

@jashoda1 We are asked to believe that jet fuel fires brought down the Twin Towers and Building 7, but they're magically not hot enough to cause major damage to the Pentagon?? Use your head.

[jashoda1]

At he wonders why the damage at the Pentagon and the WTC are "completly and totally inconsistent..." Simple logic, COMPLETLY AND TOTALLY DIFFERENT CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS.

[jashoda1]

At around 06:00, he explains that they were looking for pictures of a plane hitting the pentagon, eluding to the fact that there was a picture of the second plane hitting the Twin Towers. I ask, could that be because EVERY camera in the area was now on the Twin towers whereas the Pentagon was only attacked once?

[vlag]

z0mfg ffs I couldn't leave my pc without having to respond to this..

YOU IDIOT. It is the surveillance cams in the Pentagon site. What the hell are you on about with the security cameras ON the twin towers?? Wtf? Your saying the Pentagon surveillance cams in the area had super-powerful long vision and see the twin towers all the way from DC.. lmA0.

[jashoda1]

You should have just stepped away from your computer. You see, vonKleist was questioning WHY there were pictures and video of the twins. But the shot he gives is of the second tower. After the first tower was hit, ALL CAMERAS were on the second tower. That is WHY there were so many pictures. The pentagon was hit ONCE. So it was unexpected. Meaning people were not snapping shots as a plane hit. Please, where do I refer to a surveillance camera?

[canaansales]

@jashoda1 Again, the Pentagon - center of American Military DEFENSE does not have surveillance video of its exterior surroundings?? Ludicrous.

[jashoda1]

05:42 vonKleist explains while using an already discredited french started website..."some cases showing a smaller hole"...Note that "hole" he is refering to was admitedly cut for rescue and recover ops. Not to mention it would have been the EXIT hole if anything.

[vlag]

Eh No.. It is a fact and part of the official conspiracy theory.. The nose of the plane made that exit hole in the third ring. I don't know what the hell you're on about again with this one. You are saying something contrary EVEN to the official story. Jezuz.

[jashoda1]

No, the official story says that the plane made a small hole, it was then enlarged to make way for rescue and recovery. It doesn't make sense to do it from one side of the building. So they made a whole bigger, makeing the wreckage accessable from both sides.

[jashoda1]

Mr.vonKleist obvioucly believe something other than the official story. What Mike Walter ACTUALLY said was, "I looked out my window and I saw this plane, this jet, an American Airlines jet, coming. And I thought, 'This doesn't add up, it's really low'. I mean it was like a cruise missile with wings." Right away this video is using usual "chop quote" tactics. Lets see what else is wrong...

[vlag]

Now this one, I agree with you in that it used such sloppy tactics as to misquote someone..

[jashoda1]

I'm glad we agree one something. The important thing is that vonKleist puts faight in Mike Walter by using him as a source. Either, he is a good source and Mike is telling the truth about seeing the plane. Or he's not a good source and this video is done. Equaly important. Take this examply and apply it to ANY CT video. Whether you agree with me or not, put the quotes that people say into google and 95% are misquoted and chopped. Try it, you won't like what you see.

[jashoda1]

Let start at crediblity of this video. Dave vonKleist puts a premium of actual evidence. YET the VERY first "video evidence" he shows, is right off the bat, a blatant misrepresentation. At 04:32 he shows Mike Walter saying "...It was like a cruise missile with wings."

[ShaggyTheClown17]

Theres no possible way to argue with the conspiracy claims, the government has lied to us, only now is the government suspected of committing the crimes.

The government has invoked the wrath of the people on them, they may ahve us in chains but their real fear is for us to break free.

[RacingRoy]

some day the government will produce a video showing a 757 hitting the pentagon in photo shop... BUT what the government cannot produce is any footage that would contradict what they have already given out... And they have indeed backed themselves into a corner on the pentagon issue, and cannot change their story. LOL

[IamtheLordofDoom]

This guy Dave is an idiot.

[HydrowolfTD]

stage one....?

[viducce]

Wollt Ihr den totalen Krieg? Goverment

Do yo want war?

Ja! People

Yes!

[Galanttttt]

I'm convinced

[OperationMockingbird]

If you all really want to know what hit the Pentagon, it was a surplus Navy Douglas A-3 Skywarrior retrofitted with Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote control systems, fire control systems, engines, transponders (Mode 4 or Mode 5 IFF) and radio-radar-navigation systems.

[harrypopler]

i saw this video some one gave us this .... its a wierd video

[JohnnyIV]

I live in northern VA and I know people who saw a plane hit the Pentagon. Also, thousands of people on I-495 saw a plane hit the Pentagon. Done.

[DaveDrumstick]

once again: where the fuck is the plane debris? How come NASA was able to recover most of space shuttle Columbia remains scattered all over America, even the mission patches of the space suits but no one found a single piece of luggage neither here nor at Shanksville! Huh? Will you fucking explain that?

[vlag]

Yes I agree. Even weirder is the fact that they still deny flight 93 was shot down even though that is what they were SUPPOSED to do on that day - protect American skies and intercept rogue aircraft. This thought is backed up by even some people who are convinced that 9-11 wasn't an inside job.

[brokencasket]

why is the explosion in the opposite direction than the plane traveled? Wouldn't the momentum of the plane carry the explosion towards the pentagon?

[najeealabbasi]

u call that an airliner it has a missile on it fuck all of u that is not airliner flight 175 who nows what flight that is it aint an airliner

[blindingsun]

boeing 757;s nose section is only bout 15 feet wide.

check the boeing website

[morninggloryseed]

"CNN debunks 9/11 Pentagon CT"

Put that into a search engine and you will see that the "missile" theory is BS.

[alphamain]

If you don't support the theory, just explain why not having 100++ hole instead of 60++ feet one.

[SaveAmerica888]

This is a Constructive Clip, that help you see things in analytical way so you can decide the truth. Remember preception is realty! Therefore Govt. knows how to manipulate the public of thier side of the "Reality Truth to you". You fools dont ask Nothing! therefore, you know NOthing! therefore you are Ignorant! Got it! future Trash????

[SaveAmerica888]

Instead trashing others for thier nobble opinions which makes a whole lot of sense. No one should take this clip alone to decide if this is the truth or not. If this is the truth then, it raises alot of question about reasons behind the plot and consipircies. God says what??? "Ask and you Shall Recieve"

[SaveAmerica888]

Well done! For all those who hate or discredit this film/ video. You are silly fools, Corprate Babies! who have no mind of your own to decide the facts on your own rather you fools like to buy in all the Government's Crap! just as you do with Corp. America. Why dont you smarites come out and tell what you think is the truth!

[misterjaz]

so being a radio talk show host makes you a structural and aeronautical engineer? and yes, there was quite bit of plane wreckage found. You sir, are a moron.

[NoseyBstard]

boring because your voice is slightly uninteresting. You should have hired someone else to do the narration. I realize you are a radio jockey? but still....

[drkaos0909]

According to your official conspiracy theorists theory, the whole of the pentagon should have collapsed in the same way as wtc's 1 and 2. You cannot hvae it both ways.

[tony76ms]

this guy is a radio show host, no credibility what so ever.

[Tsager22]

STOP TALKING ABOUT THEORY AND CONSPIRACY YOU STUPID FUCK!...WE KNOW THE DEFFINITION. This guy is full of shit, dances around broad assumptions. What a joke.

[jamestampere]

it was an american airlines jet..no question...if you want explanation please ask and i will post..but it was american airlines flight 77...

[jagiar]

Let the Pentagon release the tapes. It's easy for all the conspiracy theorists to go away, RELEASE THE TAPES! RELEASE THE TAPES!!

[chaoscleaner]

Jagiar: One problem with the Government releasing any future tapes, is that CT's would dismiss them, as they have the ones that were released. They'd Cry: Fake! Fake! lol

[robinla]

Why do you think they haven't released the tapes? Because they show that it actually was a airliner that hit the Pentagon? Or because they do not show that it was an airliner?

[CypressHill80]

because bush needed a reason for war ... u know how much money war makes ...

[Xiahoud]

yea i just do...

[Tylerthedruid]

Can anyone actually provide a MOTIVE for the possible conspiracy?

Or were they just killing people 'to be mean'?

Every time something like this happens there are multiple theories. Every national emergency, including the Vtech shooting, evokes conspiracy theories.

Get specific people, WHO did this? Was it the president? Who helped him carry this out and why have they not spoken?

WHY did they do this?'

Answer those questions, thx

[overmind25]

google

new American century pearl harbor

[overmind25]

Simple answer: after the fall of the Soviet Union numerous neo cons believed that America now had the ability to increase its influence across the world. They needed support for their agenda and the project for a new American century which Bush and many of his advisors are part of, stated that a new pearl harbor would be needed to muster broad support for America to build a top notch influential American Empire.

[overmind25]

Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowtiz, John Bolton, and other high ranking administration officials were part of the new American century.

[houghes]

Why would a terrorist hijacker, with poor pilot skills try to fly the 757 into a wall of the pentagon ,when he could have just crashed anywhere onto the huge area of the roof of the pentagon???

[mhks68]

HA ha!!

[666bushisnazi666]

^^^hey asshole, if georgie bush didnt rig the election back in 2000 and Al Gore was president, since he did win fair and square, the attacks on september 11th 2001 would NEVER have happened and dont you forget it either you fuckin bitch ass bush loving republican.

[thegarbinator]

1. No evidence of rigging

2. What makes you so sure that the attacks wouldn't have happened because someone other than George Bush would have been in power?

Honestly your insults and idiotic speculation won't prove what you say is true.

[Casper336]

1) Bush is not a Nazi or he would be kissing Frances ass right now instead of working against them. (Don't say French isn't Nazi that's Germany because if you do you should kill yourself)

2) No, Bush didn't rig the election you dumb fuck the computers fucked up. But yes, Al Gore did get more votes.

[millerdod]

the computers didnt fuck up... america has how many states? they all said al gore won or whoever, when he was celebrating, a show called FOXNEWS said bush one.. guess who owns foxnews? george bushes brother... the computers didnt fuckup what an excuse.

[thegarbinator]

Where do you get your information from?

[emjaydude123]

george bushes father was best friend with usama bin ladin... thats scary

[ClaudeBalzzzz]

You know what? I vote Republican, but I hope the democRATS do take over both houses AND the Oval Office.

That will be the ONLY thing that shuts up these conspiracy nutjobs. Nah, probably not. They eat their own, too.

[thegarbinator]

So how come there are pieces of the plane and actual human remains inside the pentagon? I didn't know that people could ride missles...

[KingLuchieus]

what happened to the plane no plane but human remains common sense people

[thegarbinator]

The plane was mostly destroyed in a crash. There are parts that were recovered in the pentagon. Also there is no way a cruise missle could have hit 5 lightposts and a generator before crashing into the pentagon.

Common sense people.

[millerdod]

US Goverment released a simulation of the plane's black box or whatever you call it... it was not even low enough to hit the poles. people have called up the person who released it and he said, "no comment"

[thegarbinator]

Please show me this simulation because neither I or anyone else have seen it. And why would the government release a simulation disproving their theory is they planted it in the first place?

[YouTUser]

FREEDOM OF PRESS!

FIGHT THE POWER!

[mwalkerbcc]

Part of the hole is from the building collapsing, not burning. So if other parts of the building we're pulled down or fell because of collapse it doesn't mean they burned, moron.

[Crips1874lyfe]

im glad i dotn do craCK have u noticed that there areburn marks on the other side? or that the plane may have hit at and angle? the plane did not explode right away it ripped through. whoever made this should get a life....

[illslogic]

Crips1874lyfe if the plane did not explode right away why didn't the building collapse right away? Are you saying that the plane flew through the building and sat in there and then exploded without leaving a hole first? Was it magic or something? No you should get a brain you idiot.

[RCWorks]

That means the more of your crap we swallow the more likley we would believe it... Well I don't buy it.

[tallsmile28]

A cruise missle has wings.

[guitarboy1986]

I dont know what to believe anymore

[johnsonfan4817]

if a missle hit it the pentagon what happened to the plane. Why are youll beleiving this shit of course a plane hit it, what did the plane do just disappear. dumb shits

[theKingdomawaits]

Crash it in Nevada in land that you will never be allowed in and cover it with tons of sand.

[johnsonfan4817]

You are so retarded the FAA had the plane on radar and it just disappeared over the pentagon. If it did go over Nevada the FAA would have it on radar. Ok. Dumbass

[Casper336]

Hushh.. Yes, matter of factly the plane just did disappear.. Don't talk shit you uneducated, retarded bastard. 2 Days later they found pieaces of a plane washed up on the VA side of the East Coast, 9/11 took up all the front pages so no one paid much attention to it. As I said the government would much rather have a missle hit the pentangon then a fucking plane, because the plane would put us in a depression.

[thegarbinator]

How would it put us into a depression? Three other planes crashed, why not a 4th?

[maxuzi]

video of missile hit on pentagon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v­=iz-Qi5EJmXA

[ThoughtCrime7]

Good video. 50% now believe and growing! Those who don't know yet, watch Loose Change.

[randomcommentguy]

Because he even knows what a cruise missle is, it shows that he is capable of the distinction between that and a 757. Who told him to change his story?

[randomcommentguy]

Watch carefully. At 4:30min, an eyewitness says he saw a "cruise missle". Now, search youtube for "9/11 pentagon information", and forward to 2:30min. This is the same eyewitness, this time sure that he saw a "jet" an "airliner" of "American Airlines. Why did he change his story?

[slackdave]

Can't you post a link instead?

"9/11 pentagon information" gives no search result.

[MojaveHigh]

Come on now. Watch the entire video. This change of story as you call it is from the same interview. He calls it a jet, then 10 seconds later says it was like a cruise missle with wings. No change of story.

[tellthetruth]

http://911physics.co.nr/

[PkofPk]

Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories

http://www.geocities.com/debun­king911

911 Myths

http://www.911myths.com

Loose Change Viewer Guide

http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/L­ooseChangeGuide.html

Counter-video of Loose Change

http://www.lolloosechange.co.n­r

911 Conspiracy Smasher

http://911conspiracysmasher.bl­ogspot.com

[tellthetruth]

http://www.link4u.com/candle.h­tm

[mac1davis]

Wow, differently constructed buildings reacted differently to plane impacts. 25% of the impact area was not scortched but the other 75% was, outrage.

[Casper336]

Incorrect. My father took me to the Pentagon when I was 15, and I was dissapointed because it was hardly damaged/burnt. The Pentagon was built to resist armed terrorists not planes. If a plane did hit the pentagon would be completly coverd with smoke and badly burnt, but if the government was involved they would never let a plane hit the pentagon because it would send the whole US to a depression.

[tellthetruth]

http://www.stopthelie.com/1-ho­ur_guide_to_911.html

[spacecadette]

1st group of people will deny what they ware seeing could possibly be true...

I think its possible but highely unlikely.

2nd grou of people will try to stop it from being rreleased..

yet here we have a documentary about it.

3rd group of people will say they are not surprised they knew it all along...

how could they could then yknow it all along unless they watched this documentary,there would be no reason to think it was a missile,unless you watch this documentary

[spacecadette]

the fact there are no burn marks is a bit wierd though,I dont hacve an explanation for that.

[spacecadette]

Also I just seen a video where you see the tip of the plane just before the explosion so this conspiracy theory is baloney,but the video is interesting though.

[Dan2000]

Actually you saw a cylindical shaped white blur.

[spacecadette]

Admitedly it isnt too clear,but to make up nonesense like this,has no respect for the people who died on the plane,its very sad that just moments after you see that image from the right all those people died,and they had nop idea that was the end of there lives when they walked onto that plane,I dont think its a missile,but looks like you do,its fun to disagree though :D

[spacecadette]

What would they have to gain by makeing this hoax up,and how could they make up such a hoax so quickly,i havent watch the other parts yet though wil tomorrow,no time right now.

[spacecadette]

Well it says the hole was smaller than the wing size (tip 2 tip),but maybe the aeroplane didnt go all the way through,so it would be the cockpit and the part of the wing span.

[slackdave]

I'd say the wings would brake off..

I'd also suggest when they ask them selves, they should ask someone else (an official) and get their explanation, rather than speculate over and over.