Added: 2 years ago
From: yonkersracing
Views: 4,881
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Vtecs just kicked in yo!

  • good ass fucking run my respect... not a fan of the RSX but and S2K yeah... u guys were dead EVEN... thumbs up....

  • great runs. nice driving. 

  • 02-04 rsx-s will not lean out with I/H/E (NO TUNE NO HONDATA)

    05-06 rsx-s will LEAN out with I/H/E (NO TUNE NO HONDATA)

    with hondata ur fine

  • @AzNJohn25 no, you're wrong....I have an 05 RSX-S and dyno'd w/ I/RH/E and it was pig rich up top.

  • 05 rsx type s will lean out to much with just I/H/E gotta get tuned or hondata

  • @AzNJohn25 no it won't, i got dyno'd and it was rich at high rpm

  • not surprising... the 01 s2k was a 2.0 w/ lower redline... place that Rsx with a 2.2 03-07 s2k with a 9000 redline and then you will have one hell of a race

  • @cargecko007 actually I think you have it backwards, the 2.0L s2k was the one with the 9K rpm redline, while the 2.2L s2k has an 8K rpm redline....I have driven both. Great cars, but not as fast as people make them out to be. The same goes for the RSX-S, the 05-06 is a bit quicker than then 02-04, just like the newer s2k's are quicker.

  • @yonkersracing yup i had it backwards (my bad) and they r pretty fast, ive seen people pull low fives stock and even mid fours with bolt ons from 0 to 60... if its fast enough to compete with a bmw z4 and a porsche boxter and win than its not that bad.

  • haha...its funny listening to all of yall argue...which of yall actually own an S2000 or RSX-S????

  • motor for motor is the RSX-S faster then the S2000? Because i've seen alot of RSX's take S2000's and I don't see how With the way these street races go, You would think Honda made the S200 with the RSX in mind when in fact they should have had the Porsche Boxter, BMW Z4, Audi S4,S6, Mazda RX8 etc.. In mind..

  • rsx has to have mods or the guy in the s2k cant drive

  • or you're in denial, s2k's aren't that fast

  • yea i kno they aint fast but their faster then a Rsx k20a hp200-142tqw FWD stock An k24 250hp an torque Idk RWD you do tha math An like i said the person in the S2k must cant drive or the guy in the RSX have some good mods to beat him Trust I kno Im a owner of a k20a Dc5 4LiFe

  • so am i and a CAI basically puts the K20 right next to a bone stock S2K...the first race the RSX jumped a little but the 2nd was pretty dead even, i think the s2k started to pull at the end of 4th

  • and what the hell are you talking about a K24 for? The s2k has a F20

  • An my bad my mistake i ment 2 say they do have F20c INline 4 motor not k24 i was thinkin about somthing else

  • yea but the race was pretty much over 3rd gear iz the RSX strongest gear

  • No they are not but they sure are faster than rsx type s lol

  • from a stop sure, stock for stock sure.....once you start moddin k20 > f20

  • @yonkersracing

    i agree. my brother drives a 05 rsx type s. got a intake

    spank a s2000 roll. digs all depends how good the s2000 driver is and how he launches it

  • @AzNJohn25 thank you, my 05 has I/RH/E and I am just itching to race an S2K to prove my point.

  • @yonkersracing i have a bone stock 08 s2000 and a 03 rsx type s with a exhaust, header, and cai. I assure you the rsx is not faster. Its really a drivers race. The rsx is very satisfying to tune because simple bolt ons make alot of power vs the s2000. I dropped a full second 1/4 mile time off stock with just a intake, cai, header, and reflash (recently).

  • @mucura1 i'd beg to differ but there's really only one way to find out,,...the rsx in this video was CAI and 05 Catback exhaust only....not even a header, if he had a header, there is no doubt in my mind he would have pulled the stock AP1 S2K more. I really don't know how the AP2 matches up, I know a few owners with stock ones but apparently they don't want to run my 05 RSX-S w/ I/H/E....so I can't get you video to prove my point. I do believe the S2K might feel faster b/c it makes more power

  • @yonkersracing ...lower in the RPM range, but until you run them head to head like we did here, you really don't know

  • good runs bro

  • it's not stock

  • s2k is quicker for sure. lose the passenger and witness the result. silly people running low tq cars with extra people in them

  • each car has a passenger, silly you

  • then the s2k has a fat ass passenger load.

  • the passenger in the rsx-s weighed more actually, still grasping for straws?

  • you've left me with one conclusion, the learn how to drive the s2k

  • or the rsx had mods.. and the s2k was stock

  • congrats, you can read

  • Wow slow vs slower

  • both those cars will stomp on your mustang you probably got

  • lmao s2k slow as sh*t. most hit mid 14s at the tracks. why get that turtle when you can pick up a evo8 or 05 sti for the same price.....

  • good driving on the s2k and it can hit high 13s

  • Because both of those cars are ricers with big wings and 4 doors. You can put an S2K into the 11s with a turbo kit and a set of tires.

  • 04 s2k with 20k is $17k

    05 evo8 with 20k is $23k

    05 sti with 20k is $24k

  • and stock s2k runs 13.8

  • stock s2k runs 13.8???lmao. show ME! look at my video. i had a type R in a hatch and the BEST i could do with good tires was a 13.9..and my civic spanked on s2k all day at the tracks. most were hitting 14.5s. my cousin has a 05 s2k with hks exhaust and aem intake and it cant even keep up with my stock supra. and he bought his s2k for 25k with 17k miles.

  • Car and Driver, Road and Track and all the other magazines ran a s2000 and did 13.8 same as a 08 mustang GT

  • those magazines got paid to state those false times....dont you know that? have you driven an s2k? you dont get ANY power untill about 7k....and even then it still doesnt pull that hard....so how can something slower than my civic post faster times....doesnt add up to me.

  • A swapped civic yea not a stock one. Thats like saying vs a s2k with a turbo in your civic. IDK why I even waste my time with you

  • Just cuz he ppl you know cant drive doesnt mean others cant

  • 13.8 for a stock s2k does not happen often...they are more like low-mid 14 second cars stock, really...

  • I know I'm not saying everyone can run a 13.8 in an s2k, but their are ppl who have done it so it is possible. I said before to that the best I have seen with my own eyes is 14.2~

  • @KoukiR- not comin at you directly just a good place to post it but

    Ive run 13.6 in my S2000 with intake and exhaust, and for anyone out there that actually knows anything about an S2000 intake and exhaust are more for sound than anything...maybe good for 4-5hp

  • @CastanzaZC where is the video or timeslip of this magical 13.6 run w/ i/e

  • @tommieboi707 apparently your just a hater because you probably cant afford an S2000...i would have loved to run your b18c5 powered hatch in my S2k...if you even kept up all i need is a lil squirt from the bottle in my trunk and bust a 13.1 on you no problem

  • @CastanzaZC why buy an s2k when i have a supra that can leave you in the dust. anytime you wanna race, come to infineon raceway.....after i burn you in my civic ill take the supra out and burn you again

  • @tommieboi707 haha very nice...what year is your supra my wife and I have a 95 MKIV that is the process of getting all new turbo stuff so....

  • @CastanzaZC 94 6 speed twin turbo. check out my channel. i have vids of both the civic and supra doing some pulls. the supra will soon be going single.

  • sweet race

  • the last 2 runs were KRAZY!!! nice!!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more