There is a difference between hate speech and hate speech. In hate speech in mosques it is supported by the teaching of the religion which is full of verses that commands Muslim not only to hate the other but to kill the other. I agree though that there are fanatics in every religion but it is not commanded by the religion. They are simply fanatics.
Don't you get it poor man! These are the masked Islamists just like Tariq Ramadan who are waiting for Islam to ride over Europe!
They won't condemn Hezbollah, Hamas or any killing.! They will pretend to condemn violence but they sympathize will all acts of Terrorism and they don't give a toss about Palestine but are only too happy to exploit the situation in order to portray the Muslim world as innocent victims!
Isn't he a pedophile? Inayat Bunglawala when you speak of sex with a 9 year old it's called pedophilia! if it is offensive then stop worshiping such outdated baboons.
yes the 1st crusade was a 1000 ago - but the resentment of christians and zionist jews continues in the arab world. & with good reason. Scum like you continue to stir up hatred. I d like to drop you by parachute into the Yemen, or Gaza strip - see how long you survive with your union jack attitudes.
Only nazi scum like yourself have trouble with other races and cultures because your own wretched lives lead you to think you deserve better and you look for someone to blame. get a life you sad fuck
this is our country i dont go to muslim countrys and expect them to build me a fuckin church!
nor should i have to expect to be building them mosques!
you come here then you should except how we live if its not your thing then leave thats fine ill even buy you a fuckin plane ticket ( lot faster then the boat you came in on)
UK civilians have no insight into the history.The muslim exremists are using this ignorance,Educate urself.know the muslim atrocities have been conducted other populations .They are litterally making fool of you people.Educate urself plzzzzzzz.Things are more worse than u think
Muslims complain about discrimination when they are in a scecular country, but no one talks a bit of non tolerance towards about other faiths in muslim countries
VERY very true... The atrocities committed against people of other religions in Muslim majority countries are shocking... It is not reported either! The situation in Sudan, Philippines, Pakistan and other places for Christians is terrible. They are treated MUCH worse than Muslims in Europe and America and the perpetrators of the crimes are not punished!!!
Only muslims would have " holy and war " in the same sentence, thats why the brainwashing they receive is of primary importance. Being programmed to think as they are, stops them from having an original thought of their own taking control of their wills and replacing it with fear, once this happens they become robot like and basically useless to society. Its no wonder there are so many muslims ready to blow themselves into oblivian its not something sane people do.
Mainstream muslims in the UK have really got to 'un-hijack' their religion and root out the extremists from amongst themselves. They've got to do it fast and be very single minded about it.
We never used to have these problems so we know it is possible for Islam to exist withing the secular state of the UK!
Why should it be down to you? Intervention by the state on this is counterproductive - providing further 'justification' for extremism.
Thou shall not kill! and like Addylei said, killing one(ANYONE) = killing all mankind - this is simple enough! No it doesn't say "DON'T KILL USERNAME: GODDAMNIHATETHISSITE FOUND ON YOUTUBE"! IT SAYS SIMPLY AND CLEARLY DON'T KILL ANYONE UNJUSTLY. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? DO NOT KILL!! KILLING ANYONE = KILLING EVERYONE! DON'T KILL!! NO SPECIFIC NAMES OF PEOPLE OR TRIBES OR RACES OR RELIGION, JUST SIMPLY DO NOT KILL ANYONE!! NO ONE!! AT ANY TIME!! EVER!! UNLESS IN JUST SELF DEFENCE, OR ABIDING THE LAW
muslims must still not be happy the fact that there mosques were built by the dirty white and black men, and not muslim men. muslims get out of my country if u cant obey my countries rules.
DEMOCRACY!! FREE SPEECH!! one goes with the other - Islam doesn't preach "insighting violence", Islam teaches against racism, inequalities and hatred towards others - If a muslim insight negatives towards another race or religion he does it one his own account, not through Islam, just like White Supremicists and black militants do - there is no foundation in Islam for acts of unfair acts of violence, No racism or discriminations
They use him to occupy the world media and thereby block out and conceal the Israeli zionist terrorism in Palestine that America is funding at a rate of $50 dollars every year, a policy that has so far lasted 50 years.
The No.1 Funded nation by America is Israel, folloewed by Egypt... I wonder why? Here is some food for thought, when England assisted the unfair Jewish occupation of Palistine, it new of the consequences and offerd Australia instead, yet the Jews wanted to unlawfully aquire Palestine as thier home! Litterally, if the Palistine and Israel merged it would return to a Palistine state in a matter of 50 -100 years just in birth rates - YOU CAN SEE WHY THERE WILL NEVER BE PEACE THERE!
AddyLei you're right, but we need to understand our enemy. Bin Laden's opinion is that American civilians are NOT innocent coz they elected the leaders, so they are to be punished according to Quran 5:33
Bin-laden is an arsehole who's head hopefully will be on a spike in the near future. This dick head thrives on the media who are hypnotised into broadcasting his utter rubbish. If he wasn't allowed to broadcast his poison he would not be as powerful as he is today. Why give any credence to his warped views? Democracy they will say but he is against any of that, so why give him the publicity?
Because it sells DEMOCRATIC "CAPATILIST" NEWSPAPERS - Muslims don't want to see Bin Laden on the news, if he has issue with the west then that is between him and the west, NOT ISLAM AND THE WEST! He is not a MESSIAH or REPRESENTITIVE OF ISLAM, he represents himself, his group not THE WORLD! Yet the DEMOCRATIC MEDIA BROADCAST HIM! NOT MUSLIM MEDIA, BBC, CNN, CBS AND EVERY OTHER LETTER IN THE ALPHABET BROADCAST HIM BECAUSE HE MAKES THEM MONEY! CAPITILIZATION!! IT IS ALL ABOUT THE DOLLAR!!!
I think this is the right title: Is Islam hijacking the U.K.? The answer, of course, is yes -- extremism at the least is given special privileges due to political correctness and an extreme form of "tolerance" that is not at all tolerant. Even the leader of the Church of England believes Islamic law will be a part of British law -- a free country is now devolving to appease a large number of immigrants who do not support the mainstream, equal-for-everyone British legal system.
Don't forget Britan's ERRORS in the MIDDLE EAST and ASIA - WHO DO YOU THINK HELPED START THE 50 YEAR WAR BETWEEN JEWS AND MUSLIMS IN THE MIDDLE EAST!! THE UK!! So yes there should be tolerences, it is a democracy right? FREEDOM? everyone has the right to live -YOU SAY MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND I SAY IRA! WHICH IS WORST? A muslims VIEW iS they are as bad as each other, muslim extremists are a minority - the UK isn't judged by it's PEDOPHILE PRIESTS AND TOURISTS ABROAD, IS IT? GOOD AND BAD IN ALL!
(4:92) goes on to say:...If he belonged to a people with whom ye have treaty of Mutual alliance, compensation should be paid to his family, and a believing slave be freed. For those who find this beyond their means, (is prescribed) a fast for two months running: by way of repentance to Allah: for Allah hath all knowledge and all wisdom.
^That grouped with the other verses I referenced should make it clear that harming non-Muslims is WRONG in Islam. Stop with your hatred already.
...that if any one slew a person - **unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land** - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people...- Qur'an 5:32
*The verse clearly observes justice in the face of attack, not unconditional pacifism.
wow @ your paranoia. Muslims are never allowed to fight except to seek justice. The full verse (5:33) is:
The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off from opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
"Muslims are never allowed to fight except to seek justice."
Which is, of course, complete bullshit. 'Justice' for the Muhammedans means sharia, so when they say they 'fight for justice' they actually have to fight our 'man made laws' which are 'unjust' and offensive to them.
This is just turnspeak to pull the Islamic wool over infidel ears and eyes. Its called kitman & taqiyya.
JIHAD - A POPULAR MEDIA TERM means in ARABIC "to strive" - thus if oppressed a muslim should fight it also means for a muslim to STRIVE to become better - JIHAD ISN"Y HOLY WAR! JUST LIKE THE WEST, THE MUSLIM MUST DEFEND HIMSELF - Pre-emptive strikes in Islam are not allowed yet the US and UK done so in IRAQ! IF A MUSLIM STARTS THE CONFLICT IT IS NOT JIHAD, THE CONFLICT MUST BE STARTED AND THE MUSLIM DEFENDS HIMSELF SPIRITUALLY AND PHYSICALLY TO BE JIHAD, TO STRIVE AGAINST OPPRESSION!
Which part of "aggression is permitted only against the aggression. Qur'an - 2:193" do you not understand? Clearly, that makes harming non-Muslims/anyone wrong.
On killing ANYONE (regardless of faith):
If anyone slays a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land -
it would be as if he slew all people. And if anyone saves a life,it would be as if he saved the life of all people. - Qur'an 5:32
You may also fight them to eliminate oppression, and to worship God freely. If they refrain, you shall not aggress; aggression is permitted only against the aggression. Qur'an - 2:193
He did not consumate the marriage until she had reached puberty and was able to bear children. At that time a person was considered to have come of age and no longer a child as soon as they reached puberty.
It still happens today even in non Muslim countries (India) for cultural and various reasons and I reject your contention that all of these people are trying emulate the prophet. Centuries of Protestent\Catholic war prove how well trying to force your views on the world works out.
What I seem to be getting from you is that you are one of those people who think that FOX is really news and not a propaganda machine used by people crazier than Bin Laden. Bush and Cheney.
its funny, befor ethe ISlamic Revolution the Jews were attacked in Iran and after that they got more rights. Islam respects other human beings, but thelack of Islam, like with salafis its the case, does NOT.
Yeah, I'll believe that Islam respects other human beings when I see the first Catholic church or Jewish synagogue in Saudi Arabia.
One of the problems I have with Islam today is this. Where is the Million-Muslim March against Bin Laden? The Muslims that do speak out against him and others who "hijacked" their religion are vilified and ostracized by groups like CAIR and others that "represent" Muslims.
look, Bin Ladin's gang has killed 1000 timses more muslims than non-muslims ! They are created by others and we muslims are not stupid, we know that. Bin Ladin is OUR enemy. Saudi Arabia is a opressing country, but in Iran there are churches and synagoges. Just search it on the net. peace.
While I appreciate your candor re: Bin Laden my opinion holds. Where are the Muslims speaking out about this? You really must. Instead, poll results from around the world show large minorities supporting him and the terrorist tactics he espouses and the mouthpieces claim "victimization".
WRT Iran, Human Rights Watch has details on the persecution of minorities. As does the UN, Amnesty Int'l and a host of others. This is all available on the Web. Dhimmitude is not a respectful way of life.
listen, I also dont see the peole of West protesting against the oppression and war comiited/waged by USA & Co. !!! In Iran, the Jews and Christians are free to have their own worshipping places. ANd they even have representatives in the Parliament. I cant remember a muslim representative in USA, except one Afro-American guy who was elected only last year.
There are millions of people today who are converting to islam despite the fact that western media and governments are negatively portraying the image of islam. is islam being spread in America by force today? Only those who dont understand islam talk negatively about it.
now instead of doing this report why not do a report on how good is Islam is as one of the global religions and how it got to the UK via its roots thus being practiced there .... something to clear the air and get a batter understanding.
i say this because we cannot go on like this anymore.
day end its all the same basics do not hurt, kill and do bad things.
Bosnia, Chechnya, kosovo, Afghanistan Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, Somalia and soon Iran are some of the countries where millions of Muslims have been killed or are to be killed soon and millions more displaced, or are to be displaced. Isn't it the religions of the west which have inspired these killings? Does anyone need to read any of the so called "hate literature" of Islam to understand that Christians and Jews are killing Muslims and are therefore their enemies?
On face book, on youtube, and in the media, Muslims are demonised; their prophet insulted and are all branded terrorists everywhere in the west. War on terror is disguised war on Islam and every Muslim is a terrorist. The author of the report is someone known for his support of Israel's killings of Lebanese children in the summer of 2006. Why would anyone waste time talking about Muslims' hatred when Muslims are the victims of every terrorist act on earth?
'The author of the report is someone known for his support of Israel's killings of Lebanese children in the summer of 2006.' No, I don't support the killing of childrten. I do condemn Hizbullah's tactic of hiding among civilians, leading to tghe deaths of children in war. Israelis have never targeted children.
The only people who can determine if Islam has been hijacked are other Muslims. In a pluralistic society you should allow groups to define themselves by their own standards. Otherwise you're forcing them to assimilate and destroying their group identity. The group identity of Muslims (as with Christians, Jews, and others) is what they cherish and brings meaning to their lives. You can criticize it but you can't define it. We define ourselves.
That was common for thousands of years. Before Social Security your children were your retirement and it started early. It has only been against the law in America for a few decades. Been awhile since I researched this but in america the age of consent for marriage started at 9 and was slowly increased to 16 over several decades.
I am just saying is it reasonable to hold someone who died hundreds of years ago to a standard the founding fathers were not held to and depending on your state your grandfather was not held to?
I am not defending the practice but in it's historical context what Muhammad did was normal. The people I assume you are referring to are the countries that still practice arranged marriages and they have their own social norms and since we are just now getting around to prosecuting Catholic priest it does not surprise me they don't look to us for moral guidance.
eg, support for Torture, some say it is necessary others say it should not be used. Yet USA, who condemns other countries for such actions were court out doing this themselves (either directly or in-driectly).
In the time of the dessert, over 1400 years ago people had a different set of morals. We may not aggree with them & what they have done but if we were in their time with our current morals they will not agree with us because we have been brought up with different ideas.
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements:
"A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life.
Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder. Having sexual relations with a child once does not make someone a pedophile, first of all; second, define "child." Is a 12 year old a child? Certainly, but as I write this there are states in the U.S. that allow girls to marry at 12 and have sexual relations legally. This whole issue is only used to incite hatred against those people we are currently bombing.
do you believe that a child of nine is capable of making a life long decision before reaching the age of cognitive thinking. (ranging between the ages of 11-12)
do you think that a child really has the mind to make decisions over that of full grown men, and men of authority for that matter?
It is, but Human morality is not. Human Morality changes to the times, people live longer, marry later, have children later. But you go to poor countries where the life expectancy is low and you still see people getting married young. Morality is not the same world over. Even in ones own country people may have different morals than others.
Dirty stinking kuffr hypocrites, just look at you tube, full of hate against Islam, of course its ok, its freedom of speech, but the moment wew call the crooks as crooks, we are spreading hate.
Apples and oranges - Freedom of speech does not include death threats and incitements to violence, which are almost exclusively "faith-based" and come mostly from Muslims.
Religious ideas should be no more shielded from ridicule and contempt than all other bad ideas.
"I'm offended" should never count as an argument in any form of discourse and certainly not with regards to religion.
Except it has a derogatory connotation especially in conjunction with Sharia and really does outline the islamic supremacism.."them against us" attitude.
Please don't take people for stupid. Kuffar is routinely used as a perjorative or indictment (slur) placed upon non-Muslims. What is appropiate is to simply call people not of the faiths non-Muslims.
In all languages, people misuse words all the time. It doesn't mean the denotative meaning of the word is not longer valid.
I've read this book called The Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Qur'an by Toshihiko Izutsu; and according to him, a non-Muslim, Kuffar in the Qur'an actually mean "ingrate." So, even an insincere Muslim could me a kafr.
Wood: Why would an Arabic speaker use an English word?
That is like saying that using the word n----r is no big deal because orginally it wasn't meant as a pejorative. Kafir is also translated as "rejector" as in rejector of Islam. Kufr means to "cover up" or in fact deceive. So unless you are rejecting that Islam is the truth then calling you a Kafir would likely lead to befuddled stares I think.
I am not asking for them to use an English word but an approximate equivelant that doesn't have racist xenophobic conotations.
14:52 How can the report be objective???
saadessex 9 months ago
11:18 not just texts
saadessex 9 months ago
That muslim guy on the right is a fucking idiot...go back to paki
misterchicitymayne 1 year ago
@misterchicitymayne
He's indian not a paki as a matter of fact sir.
5af1 9 months ago
There is a difference between hate speech and hate speech. In hate speech in mosques it is supported by the teaching of the religion which is full of verses that commands Muslim not only to hate the other but to kill the other. I agree though that there are fanatics in every religion but it is not commanded by the religion. They are simply fanatics.
najiballah1 1 year ago
The Constitution > Religion
fnovax 1 year ago
Don't you get it poor man! These are the masked Islamists just like Tariq Ramadan who are waiting for Islam to ride over Europe!
They won't condemn Hezbollah, Hamas or any killing.! They will pretend to condemn violence but they sympathize will all acts of Terrorism and they don't give a toss about Palestine but are only too happy to exploit the situation in order to portray the Muslim world as innocent victims!
view587 2 years ago
Isn't he a pedophile? Inayat Bunglawala when you speak of sex with a 9 year old it's called pedophilia! if it is offensive then stop worshiping such outdated baboons.
view587 2 years ago
yes the 1st crusade was a 1000 ago - but the resentment of christians and zionist jews continues in the arab world. & with good reason. Scum like you continue to stir up hatred. I d like to drop you by parachute into the Yemen, or Gaza strip - see how long you survive with your union jack attitudes.
Only nazi scum like yourself have trouble with other races and cultures because your own wretched lives lead you to think you deserve better and you look for someone to blame. get a life you sad fuck
autofive 2 years ago
@autofive well said mate.
absolution121 2 years ago
islam doesnt even have a place in the UK
this is our country i dont go to muslim countrys and expect them to build me a fuckin church!
nor should i have to expect to be building them mosques!
you come here then you should except how we live if its not your thing then leave thats fine ill even buy you a fuckin plane ticket ( lot faster then the boat you came in on)
BNP before its to late!!
VisForVengeance1 2 years ago
you fucking idiot
what about the crusades?
you know less about history than you do about your own countries culture
autofive 2 years ago
Oh yes the "crusades" when was that again?
ahhh yes 1000s of years in the history books!
stop fuckin blamin british people for what there ancestors did!
we cant control our past its just how it is!
you have no place here most british people despise muslims even if they dont publicly admit it!
BNP!
VisForVengeance1 2 years ago
You ignorant child.
absolution121 2 years ago
@autofive The crusades were a reaction to Muslim invasion! and it was ages ago...you are asking for a repeat however!
view587 2 years ago
Has Islam been Hijacked?
The answer is yes.
eviltreemonster 2 years ago
UK civilians have no insight into the history.The muslim exremists are using this ignorance,Educate urself.know the muslim atrocities have been conducted other populations .They are litterally making fool of you people.Educate urself plzzzzzzz.Things are more worse than u think
rahul1116 2 years ago 6
Muslims complain about discrimination when they are in a scecular country, but no one talks a bit of non tolerance towards about other faiths in muslim countries
shashank2361 2 years ago 7
VERY very true... The atrocities committed against people of other religions in Muslim majority countries are shocking... It is not reported either! The situation in Sudan, Philippines, Pakistan and other places for Christians is terrible. They are treated MUCH worse than Muslims in Europe and America and the perpetrators of the crimes are not punished!!!
ajwolfgang1 2 years ago
@ajwolfgang1 phillipines is a muslim counrty? what an Idiot!
hbhisunavailable 1 year ago
atlast17 Jihad does not mean holy war
Kafirun just means unbelievers
Lots of the hate from Muslims are propagated by people people who Muslims.
Revert2Truth 2 years ago
Only muslims would have " holy and war " in the same sentence, thats why the brainwashing they receive is of primary importance. Being programmed to think as they are, stops them from having an original thought of their own taking control of their wills and replacing it with fear, once this happens they become robot like and basically useless to society. Its no wonder there are so many muslims ready to blow themselves into oblivian its not something sane people do.
atlast17 2 years ago 3
only muslims? goodness gracious, what about the Pope Urban who declared the FIRST crusade
behindthewall786 2 years ago
Yes, a very dishonerable reaction to over 300 years of Jihad against Christians in the Middle East before the first Crusade was every undertaken.
woodandsosa 2 years ago
Mainstream muslims in the UK have really got to 'un-hijack' their religion and root out the extremists from amongst themselves. They've got to do it fast and be very single minded about it.
We never used to have these problems so we know it is possible for Islam to exist withing the secular state of the UK!
Why should it be down to you? Intervention by the state on this is counterproductive - providing further 'justification' for extremism.
dogblessamerica 3 years ago 4
ur right, but the Saudi GOV, are like the UK govs best chums
behindthewall786 2 years ago
Money talks I guess. Doesn't the world just SUCK sometimes?
dogblessamerica 2 years ago
Thou shall not kill! and like Addylei said, killing one(ANYONE) = killing all mankind - this is simple enough! No it doesn't say "DON'T KILL USERNAME: GODDAMNIHATETHISSITE FOUND ON YOUTUBE"! IT SAYS SIMPLY AND CLEARLY DON'T KILL ANYONE UNJUSTLY. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? DO NOT KILL!! KILLING ANYONE = KILLING EVERYONE! DON'T KILL!! NO SPECIFIC NAMES OF PEOPLE OR TRIBES OR RACES OR RELIGION, JUST SIMPLY DO NOT KILL ANYONE!! NO ONE!! AT ANY TIME!! EVER!! UNLESS IN JUST SELF DEFENCE, OR ABIDING THE LAW
civworx 3 years ago
In the next 20 years there will be a war between the muslims and non-muslims. Lots will die and a better more moderate islam will come out of it.
matushka78 3 years ago
muslims must still not be happy the fact that there mosques were built by the dirty white and black men, and not muslim men. muslims get out of my country if u cant obey my countries rules.
jnb888 3 years ago 3
DEMOCRACY!! FREE SPEECH!! one goes with the other - Islam doesn't preach "insighting violence", Islam teaches against racism, inequalities and hatred towards others - If a muslim insight negatives towards another race or religion he does it one his own account, not through Islam, just like White Supremicists and black militants do - there is no foundation in Islam for acts of unfair acts of violence, No racism or discriminations
civworx 3 years ago
They use him to occupy the world media and thereby block out and conceal the Israeli zionist terrorism in Palestine that America is funding at a rate of $50 dollars every year, a policy that has so far lasted 50 years.
CombustableHuxtable 3 years ago
The No.1 Funded nation by America is Israel, folloewed by Egypt... I wonder why? Here is some food for thought, when England assisted the unfair Jewish occupation of Palistine, it new of the consequences and offerd Australia instead, yet the Jews wanted to unlawfully aquire Palestine as thier home! Litterally, if the Palistine and Israel merged it would return to a Palistine state in a matter of 50 -100 years just in birth rates - YOU CAN SEE WHY THERE WILL NEVER BE PEACE THERE!
civworx 3 years ago
AddyLei you're right, but we need to understand our enemy. Bin Laden's opinion is that American civilians are NOT innocent coz they elected the leaders, so they are to be punished according to Quran 5:33
CombustableHuxtable 3 years ago
Bin-laden is an arsehole who's head hopefully will be on a spike in the near future. This dick head thrives on the media who are hypnotised into broadcasting his utter rubbish. If he wasn't allowed to broadcast his poison he would not be as powerful as he is today. Why give any credence to his warped views? Democracy they will say but he is against any of that, so why give him the publicity?
turner60 3 years ago
Because it sells DEMOCRATIC "CAPATILIST" NEWSPAPERS - Muslims don't want to see Bin Laden on the news, if he has issue with the west then that is between him and the west, NOT ISLAM AND THE WEST! He is not a MESSIAH or REPRESENTITIVE OF ISLAM, he represents himself, his group not THE WORLD! Yet the DEMOCRATIC MEDIA BROADCAST HIM! NOT MUSLIM MEDIA, BBC, CNN, CBS AND EVERY OTHER LETTER IN THE ALPHABET BROADCAST HIM BECAUSE HE MAKES THEM MONEY! CAPITILIZATION!! IT IS ALL ABOUT THE DOLLAR!!!
civworx 3 years ago
I think this is the right title: Is Islam hijacking the U.K.? The answer, of course, is yes -- extremism at the least is given special privileges due to political correctness and an extreme form of "tolerance" that is not at all tolerant. Even the leader of the Church of England believes Islamic law will be a part of British law -- a free country is now devolving to appease a large number of immigrants who do not support the mainstream, equal-for-everyone British legal system.
masterofmetacognitio 4 years ago 2
Don't forget Britan's ERRORS in the MIDDLE EAST and ASIA - WHO DO YOU THINK HELPED START THE 50 YEAR WAR BETWEEN JEWS AND MUSLIMS IN THE MIDDLE EAST!! THE UK!! So yes there should be tolerences, it is a democracy right? FREEDOM? everyone has the right to live -YOU SAY MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND I SAY IRA! WHICH IS WORST? A muslims VIEW iS they are as bad as each other, muslim extremists are a minority - the UK isn't judged by it's PEDOPHILE PRIESTS AND TOURISTS ABROAD, IS IT? GOOD AND BAD IN ALL!
civworx 3 years ago
It is come out that this report is false misleading Riz Khan you fall in the trap on zionist and neocon treap be carefull
sachoudhury 4 years ago
(4:92) goes on to say:...If he belonged to a people with whom ye have treaty of Mutual alliance, compensation should be paid to his family, and a believing slave be freed. For those who find this beyond their means, (is prescribed) a fast for two months running: by way of repentance to Allah: for Allah hath all knowledge and all wisdom.
^That grouped with the other verses I referenced should make it clear that harming non-Muslims is WRONG in Islam. Stop with your hatred already.
AddyLei 4 years ago
...that if any one slew a person - **unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land** - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people...- Qur'an 5:32
*The verse clearly observes justice in the face of attack, not unconditional pacifism.
AddyLei 4 years ago
wow @ your paranoia. Muslims are never allowed to fight except to seek justice. The full verse (5:33) is:
The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off from opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
AddyLei 4 years ago
^Note:"wage war against Allah" (as in religious war against Muslims) and "do mischief in the land..." (as in aggression).
And no fooling of you required. You do it yourself with your own hatred. So keep making stuff up if you think it does you good. Salaam.
AddyLei 4 years ago 2
"Muslims are never allowed to fight except to seek justice."
Which is, of course, complete bullshit. 'Justice' for the Muhammedans means sharia, so when they say they 'fight for justice' they actually have to fight our 'man made laws' which are 'unjust' and offensive to them.
This is just turnspeak to pull the Islamic wool over infidel ears and eyes. Its called kitman & taqiyya.
thecamelsback 4 years ago 2
JIHAD - A POPULAR MEDIA TERM means in ARABIC "to strive" - thus if oppressed a muslim should fight it also means for a muslim to STRIVE to become better - JIHAD ISN"Y HOLY WAR! JUST LIKE THE WEST, THE MUSLIM MUST DEFEND HIMSELF - Pre-emptive strikes in Islam are not allowed yet the US and UK done so in IRAQ! IF A MUSLIM STARTS THE CONFLICT IT IS NOT JIHAD, THE CONFLICT MUST BE STARTED AND THE MUSLIM DEFENDS HIMSELF SPIRITUALLY AND PHYSICALLY TO BE JIHAD, TO STRIVE AGAINST OPPRESSION!
civworx 3 years ago
Which part of "aggression is permitted only against the aggression. Qur'an - 2:193" do you not understand? Clearly, that makes harming non-Muslims/anyone wrong.
On killing ANYONE (regardless of faith):
If anyone slays a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land -
it would be as if he slew all people. And if anyone saves a life,it would be as if he saved the life of all people. - Qur'an 5:32
AddyLei 4 years ago
On Non-believers:
You may also fight them to eliminate oppression, and to worship God freely. If they refrain, you shall not aggress; aggression is permitted only against the aggression. Qur'an - 2:193
AddyLei 4 years ago
try to stay on topic, fellas
AddyLei 4 years ago
He did not consumate the marriage until she had reached puberty and was able to bear children. At that time a person was considered to have come of age and no longer a child as soon as they reached puberty.
han446 4 years ago
you idiot !
msgg81 4 years ago
well, I live in Europe and I dont see mass-demonstrations as "unclefuzzy" demands us muslims to do against Bin Ladin !
AbuTourab 4 years ago
It still happens today even in non Muslim countries (India) for cultural and various reasons and I reject your contention that all of these people are trying emulate the prophet. Centuries of Protestent\Catholic war prove how well trying to force your views on the world works out.
crazycatfguy 4 years ago
I have had a couple of questions for you that you have not addressed yet. Until you get around to doing that the answer is yes.
crazycatfguy 4 years ago
What I seem to be getting from you is that you are one of those people who think that FOX is really news and not a propaganda machine used by people crazier than Bin Laden. Bush and Cheney.
crazycatfguy 4 years ago
There are 1/5 billion Muslims what percentage have 9 year old wives?
crazycatfguy 4 years ago
Who said it was hijacked? There are various sects some more crazy than others just as there are in every religion.
crazycatfguy 4 years ago
This clip is comedy gold!
NIckSouthAfrica 4 years ago
sorry gdihts - accidently ticked you down! Seems to me that the koran actually encourages killing the infidels.
mcv47 4 years ago
its funny, befor ethe ISlamic Revolution the Jews were attacked in Iran and after that they got more rights. Islam respects other human beings, but thelack of Islam, like with salafis its the case, does NOT.
AbuTourab 4 years ago
Yeah, I'll believe that Islam respects other human beings when I see the first Catholic church or Jewish synagogue in Saudi Arabia.
One of the problems I have with Islam today is this. Where is the Million-Muslim March against Bin Laden? The Muslims that do speak out against him and others who "hijacked" their religion are vilified and ostracized by groups like CAIR and others that "represent" Muslims.
unclefuzzy 4 years ago 3
look, Bin Ladin's gang has killed 1000 timses more muslims than non-muslims ! They are created by others and we muslims are not stupid, we know that. Bin Ladin is OUR enemy. Saudi Arabia is a opressing country, but in Iran there are churches and synagoges. Just search it on the net. peace.
AbuTourab 4 years ago
While I appreciate your candor re: Bin Laden my opinion holds. Where are the Muslims speaking out about this? You really must. Instead, poll results from around the world show large minorities supporting him and the terrorist tactics he espouses and the mouthpieces claim "victimization".
WRT Iran, Human Rights Watch has details on the persecution of minorities. As does the UN, Amnesty Int'l and a host of others. This is all available on the Web. Dhimmitude is not a respectful way of life.
unclefuzzy 4 years ago
listen, I also dont see the peole of West protesting against the oppression and war comiited/waged by USA & Co. !!! In Iran, the Jews and Christians are free to have their own worshipping places. ANd they even have representatives in the Parliament. I cant remember a muslim representative in USA, except one Afro-American guy who was elected only last year.
AbuTourab 4 years ago
people like you disgrace a noble religion
msgg81 4 years ago
Historically muslims have never been aggressors. people messed with them and their response has always been what you people called violence.
gumacyare 4 years ago
And how then was Islam spread in Arabia, in Persia, India, in Spain etcetera...by persuasion?
NIckSouthAfrica 4 years ago
There are millions of people today who are converting to islam despite the fact that western media and governments are negatively portraying the image of islam. is islam being spread in America by force today? Only those who dont understand islam talk negatively about it.
gumacyare 4 years ago
every country invaded by the west is an islamic country, i wonder what that means.
Yungsom 4 years ago
very good report al jazeera. a report should be put out on the supposed war on islam by the west presented with two differing viewpoints.
dansstreet 4 years ago
now instead of doing this report why not do a report on how good is Islam is as one of the global religions and how it got to the UK via its roots thus being practiced there .... something to clear the air and get a batter understanding.
i say this because we cannot go on like this anymore.
day end its all the same basics do not hurt, kill and do bad things.
.... anyone disagree please feedback this comment
msgg81 4 years ago
Bosnia, Chechnya, kosovo, Afghanistan Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, Somalia and soon Iran are some of the countries where millions of Muslims have been killed or are to be killed soon and millions more displaced, or are to be displaced. Isn't it the religions of the west which have inspired these killings? Does anyone need to read any of the so called "hate literature" of Islam to understand that Christians and Jews are killing Muslims and are therefore their enemies?
gumacyare 4 years ago
How does that literature help stop them from being your enemies?
JusticeFish82 4 years ago
On face book, on youtube, and in the media, Muslims are demonised; their prophet insulted and are all branded terrorists everywhere in the west. War on terror is disguised war on Islam and every Muslim is a terrorist. The author of the report is someone known for his support of Israel's killings of Lebanese children in the summer of 2006. Why would anyone waste time talking about Muslims' hatred when Muslims are the victims of every terrorist act on earth?
gumacyare 4 years ago
'The author of the report is someone known for his support of Israel's killings of Lebanese children in the summer of 2006.' No, I don't support the killing of childrten. I do condemn Hizbullah's tactic of hiding among civilians, leading to tghe deaths of children in war. Israelis have never targeted children.
MacEoin 4 years ago
The only people who can determine if Islam has been hijacked are other Muslims. In a pluralistic society you should allow groups to define themselves by their own standards. Otherwise you're forcing them to assimilate and destroying their group identity. The group identity of Muslims (as with Christians, Jews, and others) is what they cherish and brings meaning to their lives. You can criticize it but you can't define it. We define ourselves.
bmodest 4 years ago
3:05 - 3:15
how can saying mohammad is a pedophile be offensive if its true?
having sex with a child, just once, fits the description of a pedophile.
sheepwshotguns 4 years ago
That was common for thousands of years. Before Social Security your children were your retirement and it started early. It has only been against the law in America for a few decades. Been awhile since I researched this but in america the age of consent for marriage started at 9 and was slowly increased to 16 over several decades.
crazycatfguy 4 years ago
so you think god would mind if old men had sex with nine year olds today?
gods morality is eternal, is it not?
sheepwshotguns 4 years ago
I am just saying is it reasonable to hold someone who died hundreds of years ago to a standard the founding fathers were not held to and depending on your state your grandfather was not held to?
crazycatfguy 4 years ago
the founding fathers were not proclaiming to be vessels of god.
i would think that mohammad would be above the social norms of the time if he was truly in communication with god.
and the thing that really drives me crazy is that people still defend raping children because mohammad did it, and mohammad cannot be criticized.
sheepwshotguns 4 years ago
I am not defending the practice but in it's historical context what Muhammad did was normal. The people I assume you are referring to are the countries that still practice arranged marriages and they have their own social norms and since we are just now getting around to prosecuting Catholic priest it does not surprise me they don't look to us for moral guidance.
crazycatfguy 4 years ago
That is a very ignorant thing to say.
MustafaPresents 4 years ago
plz, elaborate.
sheepwshotguns 4 years ago
eg, support for Torture, some say it is necessary others say it should not be used. Yet USA, who condemns other countries for such actions were court out doing this themselves (either directly or in-driectly).
In the time of the dessert, over 1400 years ago people had a different set of morals. We may not aggree with them & what they have done but if we were in their time with our current morals they will not agree with us because we have been brought up with different ideas.
obz123456 4 years ago
i would be more than pleased to change my view if i can be show'n false.
sheepwshotguns 4 years ago
In those times, puberty was the factor in whether a person is ready to bear children.
Times were different, life expectancy was not very high. And what Mohammed (PBUH) did was nothing out of ordinary.
obz123456 4 years ago
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements:
"A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life.
mcv47 4 years ago 3
Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder. Having sexual relations with a child once does not make someone a pedophile, first of all; second, define "child." Is a 12 year old a child? Certainly, but as I write this there are states in the U.S. that allow girls to marry at 12 and have sexual relations legally. This whole issue is only used to incite hatred against those people we are currently bombing.
MustafaPresents 4 years ago
let me ask you this. if mohammad were here today, would you denounce his actions if he tried to take a nine year old wife?
sheepwshotguns 4 years ago
do you believe that a child of nine is capable of making a life long decision before reaching the age of cognitive thinking. (ranging between the ages of 11-12)
do you think that a child really has the mind to make decisions over that of full grown men, and men of authority for that matter?
sheepwshotguns 4 years ago
"gods morality is eternal, is it not?"
It is, but Human morality is not. Human Morality changes to the times, people live longer, marry later, have children later. But you go to poor countries where the life expectancy is low and you still see people getting married young. Morality is not the same world over. Even in ones own country people may have different morals than others.
obz123456 4 years ago
Dirty stinking kuffr hypocrites, just look at you tube, full of hate against Islam, of course its ok, its freedom of speech, but the moment wew call the crooks as crooks, we are spreading hate.
DivineLove247 4 years ago
Apples and oranges - Freedom of speech does not include death threats and incitements to violence, which are almost exclusively "faith-based" and come mostly from Muslims.
Religious ideas should be no more shielded from ridicule and contempt than all other bad ideas.
"I'm offended" should never count as an argument in any form of discourse and certainly not with regards to religion.
arngrei 4 years ago 8
Notice how this fool uses "kuffr". Islamic supremacism in a nutshell.
booryokudanin 4 years ago
Kuffar means unbeliever... as in someone who DOESN'T believe in Islam... It shouldn't be an insult to someone who doesn't believe in Islam, correct?
AddyLei 4 years ago
Except it has a derogatory connotation especially in conjunction with Sharia and really does outline the islamic supremacism.."them against us" attitude.
booryokudanin 4 years ago
He says "dirty stinking Kuffr...blah blah blah"...your apologist attitude won't work on me.
booryokudanin 4 years ago
Please don't take people for stupid. Kuffar is routinely used as a perjorative or indictment (slur) placed upon non-Muslims. What is appropiate is to simply call people not of the faiths non-Muslims.
woodandsosa 2 years ago 2
In all languages, people misuse words all the time. It doesn't mean the denotative meaning of the word is not longer valid.
I've read this book called The Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Qur'an by Toshihiko Izutsu; and according to him, a non-Muslim, Kuffar in the Qur'an actually mean "ingrate." So, even an insincere Muslim could me a kafr.
Wood: Why would an Arabic speaker use an English word?
AddyLei 2 years ago
That is like saying that using the word n----r is no big deal because orginally it wasn't meant as a pejorative. Kafir is also translated as "rejector" as in rejector of Islam. Kufr means to "cover up" or in fact deceive. So unless you are rejecting that Islam is the truth then calling you a Kafir would likely lead to befuddled stares I think.
I am not asking for them to use an English word but an approximate equivelant that doesn't have racist xenophobic conotations.
woodandsosa 2 years ago
thats right we need love and tolerance
msgg81 4 years ago
FIRST AGAIN !!!!!!!!!!
jalal0 4 years ago