Using game, where off-the-ball movement is virtually non existent, especially when talking about moving into spaces makes this 'simulation' not very accurate and real.
i think the best formation is the 4 2 3 1 because it can become 4 5 1 and 4 3 3 it attacking and defensive phases anyway and that man in the hole (AMC) the kaka, or van der vaart or whoever role, can be so effective in game dropping inbetween the midfield and defensive line can be such a weapon, especially when the defense doesnt know whether to come out leaving gaps behind or not. also it allows the wingers to attack more with the deep lying covering midfield players defending those spaces
como se nota que el que hizo esto es un friki de aupa... que tiene que ver la play con la realidad?? yo soy entrenador y te puedo decir que mas allá del 4-3-3 y el 4-4-2 hoy otros factores tácticos que son mucho mas importantes como en que zona apliques la presión, el ensayo de la transición, si defiendes en zona o no, las coberturas defensivas ect ect... hay tantas cosas que los entrenadores tenemos que trabajar que los que no lo sois no os lo podéis ni imaginar, el dibujo influye poco.
....especially with fast, adventurous full-backs getting forward and supporting the wingers. Furthermore, the best European club teams often play 451 rather than 433 in big games, i.e. with a denser midfield constraining the space for the opposing team whilst attempting to impose control of possession
Interesting approach, but too contingent on the specific teams, and the nature of the game itself. I wonder if the 'simulation' had been run a large number of times, over more teams... but even then, conclusions are better reached from 'real world' football. To take one example from the video, width is always good (especially when combined with quick passing, making the most of space) but unlike the simulation here suggests, this is not necessarily sacrificed in 442 relative to 433...
Using game, where off-the-ball movement is virtually non existent, especially when talking about moving into spaces makes this 'simulation' not very accurate and real.
drucik 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i think the best formation is the 4 2 3 1 because it can become 4 5 1 and 4 3 3 it attacking and defensive phases anyway and that man in the hole (AMC) the kaka, or van der vaart or whoever role, can be so effective in game dropping inbetween the midfield and defensive line can be such a weapon, especially when the defense doesnt know whether to come out leaving gaps behind or not. also it allows the wingers to attack more with the deep lying covering midfield players defending those spaces
mafls001 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
mafls001 1 year ago
como se nota que el que hizo esto es un friki de aupa... que tiene que ver la play con la realidad?? yo soy entrenador y te puedo decir que mas allá del 4-3-3 y el 4-4-2 hoy otros factores tácticos que son mucho mas importantes como en que zona apliques la presión, el ensayo de la transición, si defiendes en zona o no, las coberturas defensivas ect ect... hay tantas cosas que los entrenadores tenemos que trabajar que los que no lo sois no os lo podéis ni imaginar, el dibujo influye poco.
rafa8414 1 year ago
Big teams use 4-5-1 or 4-2-3-1.
Even the new Barca 4-3-3 is actually a hybrid evolved from Chelsea's 4-5-1.
darkoneforce2 1 year ago
....especially with fast, adventurous full-backs getting forward and supporting the wingers. Furthermore, the best European club teams often play 451 rather than 433 in big games, i.e. with a denser midfield constraining the space for the opposing team whilst attempting to impose control of possession
Maradobbo 1 year ago
Interesting approach, but too contingent on the specific teams, and the nature of the game itself. I wonder if the 'simulation' had been run a large number of times, over more teams... but even then, conclusions are better reached from 'real world' football. To take one example from the video, width is always good (especially when combined with quick passing, making the most of space) but unlike the simulation here suggests, this is not necessarily sacrificed in 442 relative to 433...
Maradobbo 1 year ago
nice compare
shearewell 2 years ago
really nice 5/5
marioflipao1990 2 years ago