You are just wrong, get that through your heads, objects did not make you and objects did not refine what you are, that's irrational and illogical.
All function working parts mechanisms always have a maker and life forms are not exempt from the rules of science because everything has a cause.
It's so boggus to say that we were apes coming out of Africa when there is no actual verifiable human history any older than 6,750 years old, we did not just climb down out of the trees and start talking.
@JungleJargon everything you've said has been debunked, i suggest you look into it and learn more about evolution and abiogenesis. and also we are apes. its not that we were, we ARE. it's a fact, deny it all you want.
@Keldrath You failed to prove your belief that objects made or refined what you are and you failed to disprove that objects cannot make or refine what you are.
@Keldrath You think that you can say that objects made and refined what you are without proving it! LOL!
You are deludeded, what can I say?
I already proved that all functions, working parts and mechanisms have a maker because the maker of the mechanism has to equal to or greater than the mechanism that it makes.
I would not be surprised if you cannot understand that.
@Keldrath The universe is not a mechanisms with a function, I am saying that actual mechanisms with actual functions all have a maker that is greater than the mechanisms or function because everything has a direct and equal or greater cause.
@JungleJargon "working parts and mechanisms have a maker because the maker of the mechanism has to equal to or greater than the mechanism that it makes" Does a rock have a maker? What does "greater" mean? Does the maker have a maker?
You're committing two equivocation fallacies and a special pleading fallacy in the same argument.
@YaleBreaker You are making things up. A rock does not show us there is a Maker.
It is the function of hydrogen and most of the most common elements working as ordered inside of us that proves the entire universe, consisting primarily of hydrogen and elements, has a Maker that is greater than the life forms.
The Maker of all matter is not made of matter and the evidence of the function of hydrogen proves the existence of only One Maker of one set of parts in one set of life forms.
@JungleJargon A rock does contain working mechanisms, genius.
I'm still waiting for the dumbass science to support your "everything comes from something greater than itself" notion.
"The Maker of all matter is not made of matter" How do you know?
"evidence of the function of hydrogen" Hydrogen has no function. Does a star in the Andromeda Galaxy have a function? Was it created with the specific purpose of shining in a particular place in the sky to look pretty for us?
@JungleJargon Hydrogen, know-it-all, is only said to have "function" because what hydrogen does carries superficial similarities to the concept of things designed by humans having "function". You are committing an equivocation fallacy. You cannot rigorously infer attributes of any entity by extrapolating from the linguistic symbols applied to that entity.
@YaleBreaker You are committing the fallacy of assuming that pumps and motors make themselves to maufacture the energy that we need to live. Their function goes well beyond any linguistic extrapolation. They really are pumps and electric motors turning actual shafts that literally maufacture energy so we can live.
@JungleJargon You've also still failed to define "lesser" in any coherent scientific sense.
"You have to show that mechanisms come from lesser sources, if that's what you believe." The Three Logical Absolutes do not come from any higher source, and they are the basis of all logic. They are the ultimate boundaries of form itself, yet they have no Maker. How do you explain this?
At 13:26 He said the United States was delayed in secularizing for what reason? I couldn't hear it and I'm hoping someone could inform me. Thank you in advance :)
Still however, something that is 'more likely' to be applicable to something on 'average' I don't know if that makes it 100% absolutely 'true', because it would have to apply to ALL cases regardless of situation or outside variables. It may be 'more true', but I couldn't consider it to be a' truth'.. Unless I'm not understanding the criteria to do that under. (that is.. to declare a truth, how do we do that.)
Around 4:50 it sounds like he's talking about the statistical based means of determining the moral imperativeness of a potential 'truth'. Based on a infinite timeline we would see 'trends' in morality that would determine it's effectiveness. Given that, we can't apply it to one single person, or instance in time effectively, and there will be outliers and natural variation in each single instance.. We're essentially talking about 'on AVERAGE' greatest moral outcome.
How's your boy Olby Doing? Let Me know who you pick for the Next Super Bowl Champion. I will bet on them to come in last place. You sure can pick a loser.
You are just wrong, get that through your heads, objects did not make you and objects did not refine what you are, that's irrational and illogical.
All function working parts mechanisms always have a maker and life forms are not exempt from the rules of science because everything has a cause.
It's so boggus to say that we were apes coming out of Africa when there is no actual verifiable human history any older than 6,750 years old, we did not just climb down out of the trees and start talking.
JungleJargon 1 month ago
@JungleJargon everything you've said has been debunked, i suggest you look into it and learn more about evolution and abiogenesis. and also we are apes. its not that we were, we ARE. it's a fact, deny it all you want.
Keldrath 1 month ago
@Keldrath I cannot learn about imaginary things that do not exist in real life.
We are very different from apes. Everything about us is different. That is the reason they never find anything that is half ape and half human.
Every single bodily part is different.
You have been brainwashed.
JungleJargon 1 month ago
@JungleJargon i can tell you are just ignorant so i will allow you to continue with your delusions.
Keldrath 1 month ago
@Keldrath You failed to prove your belief that objects made or refined what you are and you failed to disprove that objects cannot make or refine what you are.
JungleJargon 1 month ago
@JungleJargon i dont need to prove anything. you are the one making claims.
Keldrath 1 month ago
@Keldrath You think that you can say that objects made and refined what you are without proving it! LOL!
You are deludeded, what can I say?
I already proved that all functions, working parts and mechanisms have a maker because the maker of the mechanism has to equal to or greater than the mechanism that it makes.
I would not be surprised if you cannot understand that.
JungleJargon 1 month ago
@JungleJargon im familiar with the watchmaker analogy teloelogical argument for the existence of god. its a garbage argument.
Keldrath 1 month ago
@Keldrath The universe is not a mechanisms with a function, I am saying that actual mechanisms with actual functions all have a maker that is greater than the mechanisms or function because everything has a direct and equal or greater cause.
JungleJargon 1 month ago
@JungleJargon "working parts and mechanisms have a maker because the maker of the mechanism has to equal to or greater than the mechanism that it makes" Does a rock have a maker? What does "greater" mean? Does the maker have a maker?
You're committing two equivocation fallacies and a special pleading fallacy in the same argument.
YaleBreaker 1 month ago
@YaleBreaker You are making things up. A rock does not show us there is a Maker.
It is the function of hydrogen and most of the most common elements working as ordered inside of us that proves the entire universe, consisting primarily of hydrogen and elements, has a Maker that is greater than the life forms.
The Maker of all matter is not made of matter and the evidence of the function of hydrogen proves the existence of only One Maker of one set of parts in one set of life forms.
JungleJargon 1 month ago
@JungleJargon A rock does contain working mechanisms, genius.
I'm still waiting for the dumbass science to support your "everything comes from something greater than itself" notion.
"The Maker of all matter is not made of matter" How do you know?
"evidence of the function of hydrogen" Hydrogen has no function. Does a star in the Andromeda Galaxy have a function? Was it created with the specific purpose of shining in a particular place in the sky to look pretty for us?
What cosmic arrogance.
YaleBreaker 1 month ago
@YaleBreaker Then you're not talking about a rock, are you? You're talking about mechanisms inside of a rock and you didn't mention any mechanisms.
You have to show that mechanisms come from lesser sources, if that's what you believe.
Yes, hydrogen does have very essential functions in life forms, you need to pay attention, know-it-all.
The Maker of all those essential functions of hydrogen is the Maker of all matter in the universe consisting initially and primarily of hydrogen.
JungleJargon 1 month ago
@JungleJargon Hydrogen, know-it-all, is only said to have "function" because what hydrogen does carries superficial similarities to the concept of things designed by humans having "function". You are committing an equivocation fallacy. You cannot rigorously infer attributes of any entity by extrapolating from the linguistic symbols applied to that entity.
YaleBreaker 1 month ago
@YaleBreaker You are committing the fallacy of assuming that pumps and motors make themselves to maufacture the energy that we need to live. Their function goes well beyond any linguistic extrapolation. They really are pumps and electric motors turning actual shafts that literally maufacture energy so we can live.
JungleJargon 1 month ago
@JungleJargon You've also still failed to define "lesser" in any coherent scientific sense.
"You have to show that mechanisms come from lesser sources, if that's what you believe." The Three Logical Absolutes do not come from any higher source, and they are the basis of all logic. They are the ultimate boundaries of form itself, yet they have no Maker. How do you explain this?
YaleBreaker 1 month ago
@YaleBreaker You should know what makes a mechanism lesser or greater.
I already asked in a previous post what you think is a logical absolute.
Let me know and I will tell you if they have a maker.
JungleJargon 1 month ago
@JungleJargon "when there is no actual verifiable human history any older than 6,750 years old"
Yes, there is. Starlight.
If the universe was no older than 7,000 years, we wouldn't even be able to see most of our galaxy, let alone any significant chunk of our universe.
We can in fact see billions of light-years away from Earth, which strongly points to a universe that is billions of years old.
YaleBreaker 1 month ago
5:30-5:50 <3
farmandmao 4 months ago
14:03, the guy's cleaning his glasses
yonglin426 6 months ago
At 13:26 He said the United States was delayed in secularizing for what reason? I couldn't hear it and I'm hoping someone could inform me. Thank you in advance :)
TurtlerOwl 6 months ago
@TurtlerOwl Sounded like he said "The United States is delayed because we have the most dysfunctional system".
peopleinplaces 4 months ago
Still however, something that is 'more likely' to be applicable to something on 'average' I don't know if that makes it 100% absolutely 'true', because it would have to apply to ALL cases regardless of situation or outside variables. It may be 'more true', but I couldn't consider it to be a' truth'.. Unless I'm not understanding the criteria to do that under. (that is.. to declare a truth, how do we do that.)
KommandantKavu 9 months ago
Around 4:50 it sounds like he's talking about the statistical based means of determining the moral imperativeness of a potential 'truth'. Based on a infinite timeline we would see 'trends' in morality that would determine it's effectiveness. Given that, we can't apply it to one single person, or instance in time effectively, and there will be outliers and natural variation in each single instance.. We're essentially talking about 'on AVERAGE' greatest moral outcome.
KommandantKavu 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Not to be a dick... I love that you posted these videos. But, you know the 'after's in the titles are misspelled, right?
besidemymind 1 year ago
@besidemymind No, you ARE a dick.
FixedNewsChannel 1 year ago
@FixedNewsChannel It is like looking in a mirror for you!
How's your boy Olby Doing? Let Me know who you pick for the Next Super Bowl Champion. I will bet on them to come in last place. You sure can pick a loser.
Stick with Maddow or he may kick your ass.
You are The Homo-Penil.
mueygringo 1 year ago
@FixedNewsChannel dumbass, stop sucking on bush's cock
iamaliberal 3 months ago
Comment removed
besidemymind 1 year ago