Sight restored within weeks with ADULT Stem Cell contacts!

[robert80taylor]

After 6 months of offering stem cell therapy in combination with the venous angioplasty liberation procedure, patients of CCSVI Clinic have reported excellent health outcomes. Ms. Kasma Gianopoulos of Athens Greece, who was diagnosed with the Relapsing/Remitting form of MS in 1997 called the combination of treatments a “cure”. Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information.

[robert80taylor]

“I feel I am completely cured” says Ms. Gianopoulos, “my symptoms have disappeared and I have a recovery of many functions, notably my balance and my muscle strength is all coming (back). Even after six months, I feel like there are good changes happening almost every day. Before, my biggest fear was that the changes wouldn’t (hold). I don’t even worry about having a relapse anymore”. Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information.

[robert80taylor]

A group of Canadian patients just back from Noble have reported similar results. “I can actually see what I thought were long-dead muscles forming in my feet” said Larry Vermeersch of Kenora, Ontario. “My balance is back and I’m walking without a cane. I’m a pretty hard guy to convince, but getting these two procedures together has made me a believer. I’m looking forward to the physio ahead because I can feel everything coming back.” Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information.

[robert80taylor]

A universal benefit reported by every patient has been the recovery of bladder control. Most MS patients have various bladder control symptoms that include urinary urgency, incontinence, nocturia, or urinary hesitancy as a result of the disruption of electrical impulses from the brain to the nerves and muscles that are involved in emptying the bladder (pudenal nerve, urethral sphincter, detrusor muscle). Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information.

[robert80taylor]

Other recent MS patients who have had Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT), or stem cell therapy have posted videos and comments on YouTube v=jFQr2eqm3Cg. Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information.

[robert80taylor]

Dr.Avneesh Gupte, the Neurosurgeon at Noble Hospital performing the procedure has been encouraged by results in Cerebral Palsy patients as well. “We are fortunate to be able to offer the treatment because not every hospital is able to perform these types of transplants.You must have the specialized medical equipment and specially trained doctors and nurses”. Log on to ccsviclinic.ca for more information.

[robert80taylor]

With regard to MS patients, “We are cautious, but nevertheless excited by what patients are telling us. Suffice to say that the few patients who have had the therapy through us are noticing recovery of neuro deficits beyond what the venous angioplasty alone should account for”. Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information.

[robert80taylor]

Dr. Hemangi of Noble continues: “These are early days and certainly all evidence that the combination of liberation and stem cell therapies working together at this point is anecdotal. However I am not aware of other medical facilities in the world that offer the synthesis of both to MS patients on an approved basis and it is indeed a rare opportunity for MS patients to take advantage of a treatment that is quite possibly unique in the world”. Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information.

[robert80taylor]

Autologous stem cell transplantation is a procedure by which blood-forming stem cells are removed, and later injected back into the patient. All stem cells are taken from the patient themselves and cultured for later injection. In the case of a bone marrow transplant, the HSC are typically removed from the Pelvis through a large needle that can reach into the bone. Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information.

[robert80taylor]

The technique is referred to as a bone marrow harvest and is performed under a general anesthesia. The incidence of patients experiencing rejection is rare due to the donor and recipient being the same individual. This remains the only approved method of the SCT therapy. Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information.

[maskofsan1ty]

There are absolutely no moral issues with embryonic stem cell research. It's just 150 cells. A flies brain has 10000 cells, that's how insignificant an embryo is at this stage of development is. They are also taken from IVF treatments and would ultimately be binned if not used for research.

[monitorpain]

What about Universal Stem Cells (being researched in Israel & mentioned in one of the popular books on stem cells

Also what about dedifferentiating adult stem cells from an organ such as an eye, to the point where it becomes embryonic enough to RE-differentiate into another organ, such as a nose?

[tonymarlowe]

You disgust me.

[wrjamescom]

An infected appendix is human too, and has more cells and a more complex structure than a fertilized egg.

[InnerHealingCenter]

While I like the fact that you report about adult stem cells helping to return sight to the blind, when I listened to your take on the difference between adult and embryonic stem cells your "Prolife" stance became obvious. However, you cannot take away the fact that Bush delayed the use of embryonic stem cells. Perhaps it led to greater investigation of adult stem cell research, but it wasn't due ot scientific intentions. It was all science had left to it after Bush took away fed. funding.

[ChristianMusician85]

@InnerHealingCenter Quick question: why does his "pro-life" views matter? Are his arguments any less valid because he's pro-life? The question is whether or not the unborn child is a person with value. Pro-lifers say yes, killing living humans is wrong and that every member of our species is valuable. Pro-choicers say no, a human is not a valuable person until some arbitrary point in his/her development (usually birth or viability) making everyone valuable at different points in time.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 One with unique DNA. It's not just a 'strand of hair" because the zygote makes up all of the individual in that current state of development.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 Your adoption question is a ridiculous one. There will always be families looking to adopt children. Besides which, from everything I've heard there are more families look to adopt than there are children to adopt. And your strand of hair is not human because a) it has your DNA and b), it's not a separate entity. The sperm and ovum are also products of a person's body. Once the two are joined, a unique individual is created.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 So now you're twisting my words to say wha you want them to mean, not what they actually meant? Of course, if someone is irresponsible they shouldn't be surprised of the consequences. But killing a child is not a solution; it only compounds one wrong on top of another. If a woman doesn't have family support, there is always an alternative: adoption. It may not always be the more favorable alternatie, but it is better than murder.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 Why is the mother's right to kill her child more important than the child's right to live (which, by the way, is the first unalienable right guaranteed in the Declaration of Independence, the right to life). The child is not just a heap of cells. In fact, when the child is a fetus he/she clearly resembles a child. The only reason for going through the zygote and embryo stages is to develop everything. At no stage in development is the unborn simply a "clump of cells."

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 Killing the child won't erase the memory of the rape, plus whose to say the girl who gets raped won't have friends and family who will be willing to help support her and help her with the child? Regardless of pro-choice propaganda, having a child is not the end of the world and it's not the end of someone's life. She'll have to make some changes, sure, but it's not a death sentence.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 You make an awful lot of assumptions. First of all, your arguments are all smoke screens to detract from the real issue. The fact of the matter is that abortions due to rape/incest/birth defects/mother's health, etc are extremely rare. Most abortions are purely means of birth control. Pregnancy resulting from rape is relatively rare, plus why should a child be killed simply because of the circumstances of his/her conception.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 That's not a good reason to kill your child. First of all, doctors' diagnoses can be wrong, and that happens more than just a few times. Secondly, that's still no reason to kill your child. He/she is still a living person with rights of his/her own. And you still haven't told me why it would be acceptable to have your child killed inside the womb but not outside the womb.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 You *did* ignore what I wrote. You haven't given me one reason why a woman should be able to kill her child inside the womb, when a woman should *not* be able to kill her child outside the womb.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 That won't be necessary. I'm finished here. I'm not going to have a discussion with someone who has no evidence to support his views, who just relies on "I believe" as sufficient evidence, and who completely ignores everything I write. So good day.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 Which, I suppose, makes sense since you have nothing to back up anything you believe. And by the way, when the fetus is at its first stage it's a zygote (up to bout two weeks), then an embryo. But these are only stages of development, like toddler and adolescent. There is no reason to support murdering anyone at any stage of development.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 Scientific fact is scientific fact. It has nothing to do with personal belief, unless you like to believe what is true. And no, I'm not pro-life because I'm a Christian. I would be pro-life if I wasn't a Christian. It's not a religious point of view. One of the greatest pro-lifers who ever lived, the Father of Modern Fetology, Professor A.W. Liley, was an atheist. I think you've been completely ignoring everything I've written so far. You have no rebuttal for anything.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 It's not my personal belief -- it's scientific fact. Your argument is with science, not with me. I have given you plenty of reasons why abortion is wrong. You have not given me any other than "I believe it's okay." You're the one arguing from personal belief, despite no evidence to back up your claims.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 You've already said that. Problem is, you have no reason for believing it. There's no fundamental difference between a child inside the womb and a child outside the womb. You've given me no reason whatsoever so support your claims. So if you're just here to troll, then I'm not going to bother anymore.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 Are you talking about the conscience, which is the ability to know right from wrong, or consciousness, which is self-awareness? If you're talking about the first, babies outside the womb have no knowledge of right from wrong so that's a failed frame of reference. If you're referring to consciousness, that also fails because unborn children respond to stimuli. They are just as conscious as you or I. And a baby outside the womb is no more conscious or unconscious than one inside.

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 In your mind, what does fully developed mean? A fetus takes place after the three-month mark, so all the vital systems are already functioning. Besides, a child that's already born is not fully developed. Your brain doesn't become fully developed until you're in your teens, and you don't stop growing until late tees/early twenty's. So what is fully developed, in your mind? And what makes a child outside the womb and a child inside the womb any different?

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 So it seems to me you've convinced yourself a "fetus" isn't a child so that you won't seem so bad for supporting abortion. What if the child is born and the mother still feels she's not ready. Should it then be okay for her to kill her child?

[ChristianMusician85]

@forester9415 A fetus is just as human as you or I. Children are young people, and as such a fetus, being a young person, is a child. Fetus is just an early stage in the development of a person, similar to child, adolescent, teenager, etc.

[ChristianMusician85]

The way I understand it is there have been no success with stem cells for the same reason that you can't just give a kidney transplant to anyone...they're not compatible. If you use the patient's own stem cells, then obviously the stem cells are compatible and you will have success. Not to mention how unethical it is to kill children.

[usaaok]

I subscribed

great vids!

[KanineKruizer]

This is why I have subscribed to LifeReport.

Good story.

[Troop116rules]

Excellent Job, Josh. Great video and warning to all. Keep up the great work!!!

[watzgoodinthe718]

thanks Life Report i know you do stem cell research but can you investigate the Tong ren therapy??... It has helped a lot of patients will terminally ill patients with Stage 4 cancers,Autoimmunine disorder, nervous system disorders, etc.. They did a study on this and they said it has an 89% response rate. Once again its called the Tong Ren therapy its not Quack,, this stuff really does work..

[KarenBlakeney1]

This is a pet peeve of mine. If you begin to google "embryonic...," a list of results will pop up to assist you, and of course, the top one is "embryonic stem cells." But try to google "adult stem...," you get NOTHING. Adult stem cell research has tallied up successes, but Google doesn't even recognize it.

[ZoeyK86]

Amazing!

[icimblind]

Hey why don't you change your handle to, The Truth with Science Matters?

LOL....

Nice JoB, Again!!

[Xaulted]

This is exactly right. It's amazing how sneeky mass media is being about how ESCR (Embryonic Stem-Cell Reasearch) has show ZERO evidence that it's a method even worth investing in, when ASCR (Adult Stem-Cell Reasearch) has been proven to work on a variety of different areas. Why even go down the ESCR route when it's more expensive and shows NO promise, when we have ASCR that we KNOW works and doesn't have any questionable moral implications!!! ESCR makes no sense and is a waste of money.

[Informer3X]

@Xaulted

"ZERO evidence"? What science are you talking about? The same one which tells you that dinosaurs lived with humans, evolution is a lie caused by a flood, and the earth is a few thousand years old? And that the universe revolves around earth?

The issue with iPSCs (not ASCR) is that they have been experimentally found to produce tumors and cancers in immuno-compromised subjects. Gene reprogramming is exceptionally risky in these situations.

[Xaulted]

@Informer3X Instead of all the ad-homs, why don't you provide some evidence that apparently your privy to that has eluded the scientific community? Not sure if you even watched this video, but I was commenting on the point of this video (imagine that), namely ESCR vs ASCR and the moral component to this whole issue. iPSC's are different then ASC's, so not sure why you brought that up. I wrote my comment a year ago and still ESC's have made no headway... so where is this evidence for ESC's?

[Informer3X]

@Xaulted

That's peculiar. I addressed the issue of ES cells vs adult stem cells in other comments, but they seem to be missing. I don't have the motivation to re-write all of it, so here's the gist. ES cells require signalling, as do iPSCs, which means the time from research to treatment is slower. Adult stem cells just require extraction, culture, and implantation, so it's quicker, yes, but affords fewer lines of differentiation.

[Xaulted]

@Informer3X I don't care if ES did exactly everything they thought it would do... ie, cure diseases, defects, ailments ect... It doesn't make it right to do so. I think iPSCs are a good alternative to get the same means without having to take from embryos. There is a heavy moral component here which is the issue... otherwise why would it matter either way? What do you think the point of this video is?

[Xaulted]

@Informer3X Another thing, why is it that you so arrogantly presume that I'm some kind of 1500's Amish-like young earth creationist because I disagree with using ESC's instead of ASC's? Makes no sense.

[Informer3X]

@Xaulted

I arrogantly presume so because your comments seem incredibly, well, extreme. "NO promise" and "ZERO evidence" and "no sense and is a waste of money" all indicate a lack of understanding of the topic.

[Xaulted]

@Informer3X Regardless, Even if I do lack a bit of understanding on this topic, and I'm sure I do, that gives you no reason or right to presume anything about me. Like you're the all knowing messenger that has wondered onto this page just to set me straight by name-calling. I guess I should feel so privileged right? But how is this informing me Mr. Informer?

[Informer3X]

@Xaulted

It's not. No one is shoving anything down your throat. Was it not presumptuous of you to make comments on a topic you admit to lack some understanding on? If you want to continue going ad hominem on me, I could care less.

[Xaulted]

@Informer3X Everyone lacks understanding in everything. It's not presumptuous to comment on a topic that interest me and I don't have to have a PhD in the medical field to make a comment on this topic. How ridiculous is that? I have yet to presume anything about you personally or name call, unlike you with your very first comment to me, which was very rude.

None of your comments even deal with my point or the point of this video, so why are you still commenting here is beyond me.

[Informer3X]

@Xaulted

Interestingly enough, every single one of my posts directly pertaining to the science behind it is missing. Hmm...there have been 4 to date. That's curious.

[ChristianMusician85]

@Xaulted It seems to me that embryonic stem cell research continues on because Democrats and scientists are desperate to "prove its worth" so that abortions can be validated.