Added: 4 years ago
From: motorstelevision
Views: 273,000
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (262)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what the fuck is up with the trippy music.

  • @4RINGSS5 molesters music :)))

  • ok the m3 is faster on the track in handling, but cmon lets look at the big picture. when are you really gonna go onto a track with ur buds just to race. nowadays its pretty much straight line at the green on the streets..and in this case the c63 wins..personally i like the overall look of the c63 more then the m3, we all have different opinions, im a merc type of guy.

  • @JpGuitarist1994 and to add, it is a much more greater expierience with the c63, id rather have insane power slides and big hp then gripping on a trackk like the m3

  • The M3 is the better car but the C63 is more mental. 

  • People are such idiots... I've been reading the comments and it's like people know nothing about this car or any car. Yes, the Mercedes has a massive engine for a RELATIVELY small amount of power compared to the BMW but the torque is where BMW falters. The C63's engine is NOT detuned - Mercedes AMG doesn't use the same parts as for the SLS, E, or any of the other 63 engine series. Also what annoys me is how the 11 year olds are saying how my father can afford this and that, but no one cares.

  • these people need to stop trying to be Jeremy Clarkson from top gear

  • This car is just poised

  • @onlypedro Better check your motor sport history.

  • @BillDFC The M3 is the poised one of the trio. The Merc, although not bad, is lacking in the handeling department. However, it does make up for it with that monster of an engine.

  • @SanctuaryShred Can't afford any of them anyway,an old diesel Mercedes does me fine.

  • my friend got one .. max speed 323 kmph ... + its awsome

  • What ominous music

  • WTF is up with the music. Terrible.

    And Terrible Narrator/Reviers voice.

  • if we have two engines 6.2 litre 450 hp / 4.2 l 450 hp the 4.2 l die first

  • This cost over $170,000.00 in AUS ! :-(

  • @papadesi1 What ?

  • @911TurboGear C63

  • @papadesi1 Isnt that a littlebit toooooooo expensive !?

  • @911TurboGear My friend... thats what the prob is? 200% export duty and 30% luxury car tax. Did I tell you a Rolls Royce Phantom costs a whopping $1.7 Mil.

  • just let the man drive and stop talking men

  • its a 6.2 not a 6.3

  • Comment removed

  • @mrsmith427 with 500hp,it would be much faster than RS4,M3 and IS F.So,it has 457hp to be in class...

  • @mrsmith427 its de-tuned, same engine as sls, that gets +580 bhp

  • @mrsmith427 The engine is de-tuned for this car, this engine is also featured in the sls amg and it get 560 +.

  • That sound alone is worth the near £60K asking price!

  • The license plate looks like it says sick. Damn right, this car is nasty awesome

  • my neighbor got one, asshole ;D

    and BMW and audi are very good cars too

    check out BMW M5 G-power hurricane or Audi RS6 R

    if you look at this, the C63 is a joke :D

  • @lou4life your have no idea.........C 63 is to compare with m3 and rs4....RS6 AND M5 IS TO COMPARE WITH E-63 AMG.......THEN COME TO TALK TO ME..........

  • @aigaleada haha funny!! Come to Germany and learn something about cars before you give me advices!

  • GO BIMMER

  • Grow a brain you narrow minded, single celled, brainless idiot!

  • i agree with you that bmw makes similar horsepower with smaller engines, but the torque on the m3 is way below the torque on the c63, although the 4 liter v8 revs a lot higher, loses on torque, But the m3 is a great competitor, id rather have a c63, even tho im a bmw fan

  • Good point about the power but the Mercedes is heavier.

  • Well, C63 has 100 newtons more torque, and brabus versions have even more bhp and torq.

    And, stock C63 AMG has very wide torque chart, and i bet that the character of the engine is even better than in BMW. So learn that the numbers don't tell everything.

  • i say u got it...flaunt it!

  • Enough with the brats posting their parents' salaries and garages on Youtube. Nobody who made their own wealth brags about it so blatantly. Get some class.

  • most, if not all, these kids are jsut talking crap online.. just like everyone on the net has a 9" dick.. and 10lb testes

  • Here Here, deathicuss

  • @deathicuss agreed

  • @deathicuss

    well said

  • @deathicuss good point there.

  • @deathicuss what about athletes?

  • @fendrhead Good point. I would class athlete salaries in the same category as lottery winnings though. Yes it is your money, but you didn't really work for it and you don't really deserve it.

  • @deathicuss You sir, have hit the nail on the head. Everybody who does that is all money no class. They have the toys but lack the skills to use them. Those types of people are everywhere, in everything you could ever hope to do.

  • you cant judge a car until youve actualy sat in it and experienced its performance. i live in dubai and ive learned that watching them on video/ listening to peoples comments, and sitting in one and experiencing it, is COMPLETELY different.

    my friend just bought an E63 and after feeling how violently fast it goes, made me wanna puke. these cars are amazing dont judge them

  • my dream car

  • funny how your dream car is the car my family can afford... my dad said that he doesnt go with low end cars and also that want to get the ML class.... Old People FAILURE :(

  • @shadowscreecher your dad probably doesnt like sports cars too much lol

  • @freakkkxo lol yes they dont! my dad makes like 300,000 a year and im like "buy an aston!" and hes like "I like lexus" then im like "buy an S class AMG!" but then he says "ehh amg is more of a status... i perfer the Audi Q5" haha he doesnt get it!!

  • @freakkkxo AH MAN trust me i know how u feel ...all i know is my dad makes 56,000 a month..i sneaked in his papers lol. he buys the most bloody dumb cars...prado and nissan sunny and stuffn and im like....dad.....a lamborghini would be nice...........just saying.....lool :( my favorites are like M6, e63, X6, c63, cl63, cl65, sl63, sl65, camaro, 1969 camaro, reventon, superleggera, scuderia...i DO like the slr but..i duno...i would much prefer an sl or cl or c instead of the slr.

  • yeah...probably..cuz u can not make few dirty dollars by yourself ..thats why yu have to ask your dear dad...hehe...i drive mercedes ..but it is 2003...it is not amg..but it makes me feel better than ever..why? cuz i earned the money and i bought it by myself..say hi to your father..if u want i can give yo you my address so he could send the brand new c63 amg as a present for me...be good and dont drive your falily car too fast...caos

  • i love both the c63 and the m3, but keep in mind the engine of the m3 is a very small v8, 4 liters, and it puts out 414 hp, the c63 needs like a huge 6.2 liter to get only like 40 hp more

  • the torque of the c63 over the m3 is monstrous.

    hp sells cars

    torque wins races

  • @san21893 bullshit.. stop regurgitating false info.. ricer

  • AHAAHHAHAHAH.u read too mutch quotes pages.Shut up, the HP win the races

  • hp is used to achieve its power torque on the other hand helps with the 0-60 threshold or acceleration horsepower on the other-hand is used as a unit that is used to measure the power of engines and motors, while torque is a moment of a force, is this clear enough mr. ricer?

  • lol how many hands do you have? i counted three..

  • lol redundant text

  • HP(power) is just torque multiplied by engine speed. "Power is the rate at which work is performed"

    With torque being equal a high power car will always be faster than a low powered car. Just look at a vtec engine for example. Hardly any torque but lotts of power because of the high engine speed (frequent combustion).

    Doesn't matter how much torque your car has, it only tells half of the story. Power tells much more of the story.

    I'm afraid I dissagree: HP wins races more than torque does.

  • I agree to a point. Races are typically run with sustained high RPM's in which case cars with lots of HP, but low torque, would win out. However, in everyday street driving with more frequent use of low RPM's, torque becomes much more important. Of couse, with proper gearing HP will always win out over torque.

    Case in-point is the AMG vs M3. Strictly comparing engine numbers, the AMG should trump the M3 handily, but the M3's high RPM and gearing makes the match more more even.

  • I like both cars also, but just to let you know Mercedes cranks the hp down on the C63, the 6.2 liter engine actually has 518hp, it's the same engine that is in the SL63

  • @Bigdiesel30 no, sorry buddy they make 374 to the wheels.. which sounds about right, considering they lose 16-20% due to drivetrain losses

  • Damn that much of a loss, sounds like they need to make some changes.

  • according to California octane levels

  • nice car but the video is boring

  • crezy

  • Love the C63. The M3 is nice too, but hate the sound of the whiny engine. The AMG is like the deep sound, like James Earl Jones. The M3 is like Jerry Lewis.

    No denying the M3 handles better, but since most of the driving is on the street, in fairly straight lines, give me this over the M3 any day.

    For the sound and the feeling of being forced into my seat when I press the accelerator. AMG over the M series all the way.

  • The M3 might beat this on a track, but how many people drive their cars on tracks. This will win in a straight line and also looks more classy than the M3.

  • Comment removed

  • mercedes c63 amg= luxury and perfomance in one

    bmw e92 m3= perfomance and soul of driving with very little luxury both bmw m3 n the mercedes are great cars but at the end i would have the c63 all because of the 2 more doors

  • bmw m3 come in four door's as well!! And because of it having to 2 more than the coupe it's cheaper!!

  • mb rulessssssssssssssssssssssssss­ss

  • Comment removed

  • I doubt you have 4 luxury cars. i bet you have a triple morgage on your house and have tons of credit card debt

  • i heard this car has poor control on the track? the bmw e92 beats this..

  • Mercs are for winning...BMW's are for losing.

  • Never have been...never wil be..

  • never

  • @BillDFC well i think that mercs are for sir, gentelman and old rich men or bmw is for young motherfuckers

  • 2 words..... Brabus Bullit...... Then you can see what a C63 AMG can do....

    But a M3 is a awesome driving machine...

  • great car but m3 and rs4 are better track cars and are more sophisticated technologically

  • Celph, noob.

  • Great car but the upper part of the center console looks terrible, what happened to mercedes knobs? Looks like a friggin volvo!

  • Best V8 production engine int he world, BMW M3. Now get off my dick you Mercedes Benz Fan boys.

  • Why insult the MB Fanboys when you yourself are a BMW fanboy?

  • Keep cool!

    Mercedes-Benz & BMW are both very nice cars! And they both have a totaly different philosopie! You can't compare them 1 to 1! German cars are an art, not only a car, which is able to drive!

    Mercedes-Benz & BMW 4 ever!

  • m3 fans getting a little fisty

  • Don't be some damn ignorant... the M3's V8 does have a higher hp/displacement but is a much more high-strung and unstable engine. Further, the 6.2 L of the Mercedes is incredibly detuned to decrease wear on all of the drivetrain. Mild tuning packages have put the output over 550 hp with just an ecu reflash and are proven to be just as reliable.  Any worthwhile upgrade on the BMW requires forced induction

  • totally agree. for example, the exact same 6.3L on the E63, S63, and CLK black put out about 520HP

  • m3 is for geeks, plus it revs as a modern engine and not some old chevy, benz is for gentleman, there is no fuckin other way to feel as a gentleman and stil be fast than buying a benz.

  • thuglife4ever721: I hate big displacement engines

    It's because bmw m3 drivers have small displacements in pants

  • M3 drivers have bigger dicks. You can tune the shiit outa the M3 and it will kill this car you dont see this car tuned much or being driven much on the road cause overall M3 beats this car. PERIOD.

  • yaaa you would know considering you suck dick you fucking poor clit you wish you could afford a C63 but naww fag you cant so have fun rollin in your parents mini van poor fuck

  • Its funny how you try to assume that I drive a minivan when my family doesnt even have one faggot. When I drive a 2003 SL 500 handed down to me from my dad you fucking pig.

  • oo really thats still sucks dick you cocksucker my dad has 2 ferraris and a lambo.......... all of which are 09 unlike your piece of shit 2003 fag benz your clearly not rich or important so go suck some cock

  • Its always good to dream. But doesnt necessarily mean it'll come true.

  • Comment removed

  • lol, you're showing off your dad??? lol, that's gay....I bet if he see's this he'll wash you mouth with some "cheap" soap...haha

  • c63amg magnifikkkkk

  • It's only good in a straight line, like all AMG's. Huge engines, no driving enjoyment. M3s routinely murder C63s round tracks because the C63 can't corner. It's all academic anyway with Nissan killing everyone now, and the Chrysler CTSv is faster than the speed of light apparently.

    Can someone tell aantoon1 the past tense of drive isn't drived. And i'm fairly sure beated isn't a word.

  • c63 is better then m3, do not compare that!!!!

  • lmao. You think c63 is better then the M3 buddy? Think again cause the M3 has killed the C63 AMG.

  • C63 AMG=monster

    M3=hahahahahahaha

  • such a nice merc...but i'm not so sure about the look though

  • bizarre music...reminds me of 2001 a space odyssey

  • nerd

  • haha get off me. Have you seen that crazy ass movie? This review was creepy because of the music.

  • look more bettler my carrr bmw m3

  • BMW!! haha!

  • Very nice, I saw on another video its faster than the BMW M3.

  • This car is really fucking amazing, I know cus my father got one. And no car has beated us so far when we drived. :D

  • It's very enoying to hear the children in the background. It's hard to hear what the presenter talks about!!!

  • probably some kids that were killed in ythe making, haunting us

  • my dad has one ^-^ the guy who sold the c63 to my dad said thier was only 40 made in Canada *SOUNDS AWESOME

  • AMG OMG

  • Our familys got the c63...but sadly in the stationn wagon. Anyone that doesn't believe me, i will post a video response to prove it!

  • Why did they get the wagon???

    Grrr!!!

  • possibly the most pointless car ever made, along with the X6 and the E63 wagon. what practicality do you see in a 451 hp AMG c-class?

  • what practicality do you see in any car that has over 400 hp.

  • What exactly do you mean by 'Practicality' - it is practical, it has seats for an average size family and a reasonable boot. In terms of what i think you meant then you're obviously a fool and must be a peasant if you're that stupid...

  • the whole idea of a 451 hp small AMG wagon. unless you want room for a huge system in the boot, what could one want haul around in this car. go buy an E estate or a volvo

  • 14mpg isnt very practical

  • It is a hot rod disguised as a Mercedes...... So, practicality isn't really the goal here. Although it does have 4 doors if necessary...

  • Comment removed

  • OMG REALLY? MY DAD HAS ONE too xD but he got in black

  • C63 AMG is good but it can never be as good as an M3. Why? cuz M3 is good as a whole package while C63 in some places outshines while in other it fails.

    In a straight line C63 can easily beat the M3 but in twisty curvy roads, M3 is known as one of the best. Most of the professional drivers chose the M3 as the real drivers car. Even though my heart goes for C63 but I am sure that M3 will be a better package for any one.

  • Top Gear (TV Show) Proved your exact theory wrong. Also adding in an Audi which also lost to the benz

  • What do you mean? Top gear clearly stated that M3 is the best? Didn't you see the whole show?? Please see it first then you can comment.

  • i saw the whole show. where they raced all 3 cars around the track and mercedes had the best time.

  • if the mercedes had the fastest time around the track..that means it handles better..i dont care about their opinions

  • dude, u didnt see the whole episode...i will send you the link.

  • ROTFL M3 was the fastest, watch this episode again

  • i would take this from m3 anyday

  • I think I'd take as well. I don't care about track performance and I love the fact that you can get T version :D And it's much comfier than a BMW. +if you car about track performance aftermarket limited slip diff is available, so it would go around track nicely as well.

  • i would choose because i simply love AMG

    i love the sound of the engine

  • Mercedes is too aggressive..and thats what i love about them..

  • same here ;)

  • car is a beastttttttt id take it over the m3 or rs4 anyday. plus its mercedes man. what more would you want? the most elegant powerful car of its kind

  • Nice moviw, check out mine "Crazy Driving in Reutlingen"

  • BMW is a way back from MERC, and it is and it will be that way!

    the qality of both cars are great ,cant say nothing,but what comes to ergonomic things,MERC has all things buttons,sticks,leavers vhere they should be,so you dont have to search every fucking knob from the dash like in BMW

  • Dont have to search every knob like the bmw? You must never sat in a CLK350 than lol

  • what a beauty...

  • its a beast dressed as a lamb

  • this car looks hella nice cars are looking better and better...

  • the c 63 amg is a wounderfoul car

    all things on this car are perfect

    its dangerous to drive without esp

    i saw a challenge c63 vs m3 and in all categories won the c63 !

  • lol, no, c63 is faster and more powerful, but M3 has the upper hand in the handling and control.

  • really i thought it too but that isnt real some years ago that was right but now not on tv they tested very exactly the handling/..and there the c63 was really better and the they drove on a test track (it was a track like a go kart track very small ) normaly the m3 must be faster there but not now the c 63 amg was faster on the track taht is a prejudice i like more th amg look the design omg tyres/front side /back side ....what a design what a engine...omg
  • Again please do some research:

    Edmunds comparison test:

    C63: 0.89G skid pad

    M3: 093G skid pad

    and a quote:

    "There's not as much tactile feedback through the C63's steering wheel as the M3's, however, and there's less warning should the C63's rear end break traction while exiting a fast turn under power. It's not at all tricky, but the C63 doesn't inspire the same confidence as the M3 near the cornering limit."

  • what about a comparison between manual transmissions? oh, wait. the Merc doesn't even offer one.

  • yeah it does you idiot. My s-class can switch between manual and automatic.

  • no it doesn't you idiot. your S-class has an automatic with "manual" mode. the "manual" mode is just like the regular mode except you tell it when to shift (but it still shifts for you). it still has a torque converter, which means it's an automatic. a manual has three pedals and a stick shift. know your shit before you start calling people idiots.

  • so do these have f1 gear boxes or is it just a automatic with an option to shift when you want to

  • Uhh what's the point the MB is faster on the road? And it looks better than a bmw.

  • love the m3 but this is beast

  • fuck you your poor ass cant afford this shit

  • not allot of people can ^^

  • Meh. On American roads, where you can't go too fast for too long without getting pulled over - all that instant torque is instant fun at speeds that won't toast your license. If I lived somplace where you could see triple digits all the time (re: German Autoban) and had like, those roads going over the Alps not too far away, yeah, sure, why not get an BMW M3. But here in the US? Listen to that exhaust note - and realize you spend most of your time under 70 mph - where the Benz is teh moar fun.

  • WTF is with this rivalry comments between the C63 AMG and the M3??? Both cars are great, and if you have the cash.. hey, congratulations you will not go wrong.. belive me...

  • I love the front end... very aggressive..

  • and you dumbasses i suggest you read what did merc in WTCC ,and you read carefuly,bmw is also known as the manufacturer of plain motors firstly,they did their firs car in 1930-s ,merc had a car a way earlier than that!

  • it is obvióus that the bmw fanns are doing everything to make the merc down, bmw isnt that great car at all,

    what things are in bmw that merc dosent have? answer is nothing

    what has merc that mbw doest have? AND the answer is A LOT OF THINGS THAT YOU CANT EVEN IMAGINE,

    why does come merc with so high pricetag? because it has so many thing that other manufactures dosent have,including bmw,merc is the highest bossible car to get