Added: 4 years ago
From: headzup
Views: 121,926
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (268)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @orkneymist Was that Turing?  If it was Turing, wasn't he rewarded by his country a few years later when the British legal system mercilessly hounded him for being homosexual?

  • @arelente2 OK, so I failed to realise the irony. But I don't see it even now.. took you for a real bad hardliner.

  • @arelente2 And by the way I don't know how they handel that kind of statement elsewhere but where I life it is criminal to call for the murder of people in public. But I think that in the US at least, the incitement of a crime is handled like commiting the crime yourself.

  • @arelente2 What about her? She was one of his loyalst followers even in the "official"-vatican release of the bible. In a few onficial ones she was the true hire of the the new belive and was forced to flee because the male ones did want the leadership.. no body can say which story is true or false just because some old men were in charge of the text selection.

  • Okay the book of Leviticus says they cant get married nowhere in the bible does it say they can save lives.

  • Hell no! I wouldnt let a homo translate it!!

  • yes would i dont give a sh** about race or sexual preface so if you say any thing bad about homosexuals than u can go to hell i dont care

  • You obviously care, or you wouldn't speak so strongly about it.

  • Bible freaks... >_>

    God must be ashamed... lol

  • @ChouJunk The real problem is that they belive in their view and are realy fixed that way. Its a lot of hard work needed to talk some sense into them after they did listen to those preaching nutjobs.

  • that the bible had multiple authors declares the variable directives in the bible, which disprove the other.

    Oh und wenn Dir meine englische Redeweise nicht hochwertig genug ist, dann rede bzw. schreibe ich Dir ab jetzt auf Deutsch, um mich eloquenter ausdrücken zu können. Zufrieden?

  • You want me to comprehend historical and biblical facts? In ancient Greek (more precisely Athen and Sparta) about 600 B.C. homosexuality was statuory for free men. They had to hold a catamite. And you, Testyvenom, ignore that faith IS an oppinion.

    If we would GUESS (not belive) that God does exist, and we GUESS that he doesn´t want homosexuality, why doesn´t he ACT and kill everybody who is homosexual?

    that the bible had multiple authors declares the variable directives in the bible.

  • But even if it isn´t your oppinion, that homosexuals have to be killed, you don´t tolerant their way of life. it is still illogical, because jesus "told" to tolerate everybody´s will.

  • first: i´m female.

    And what i wanted to say, is that it is your oppinion that homosexuality is a sin. and so you are barring anybody from this discussion, who doesn´t believe in your way.

    I know that your quote was out of context and i know that the bible has been written by many authors. i also read the bible (just in parts, but i read it). i´m not an uneducated child.

  • It is God's opinion? How do you know? Did a burning bush speak to you lately? Or did he come to your dreams? Or maybe you recived a 11th commandment: "You shall not make love with sombody of your own sex." Did it fell on your head? Was it written in stone? Did that hurt MUCH?

  • This is my last response to you because I'm getting tired of your redundant and illogical statements and questions. I "know" this because it is in the Bible and the Bible is God's Word, therefore it is a statement made by God that it is "detestable" to engage in homosexual activities. The only reason I keep responding to you is because I care enough to even bother to do so; it's not because I like arguing with you. If you simply don't want to listen, I am finished speaking with you.

  • So who is ignorant now?

    Illogical?The only thesis you gave was "The bible is God's word so everything in it must be the ultimate truth!"

    And I gave a lot arguments to show that the bible or lots of it is menmade and contains thereby opinions and knowlege of the times it was written and translated and..do not say you belive a bunny is a ruminant and the earth is a disc..the same with homosexuals are bad..its just an opinion and was never written by god.Heck the authors didn't even claim it was.

  • @FateMaster2 do you have an ultimate goal for marring the same sex? I Got one goal in mind it's to reproduce without getting any aids nor having genetics do it for me. If you depend on technology to help you your not living a healthy life style well thats what my health teacher said

  • @spacezombies1 No found none. Is there one for horras every person who has a different livestyle than your own or to condemn everthing you don't understand? But there is ont to be tollerant, helpfull and nice to other people. Jesus himself helped people the society declared to be unmoral, tainted or even an enemy so how does that fit into your view of his wants?

  • @spacezombies1

    Don't be an hypocrit! Thanks to technology/science you are alive... You get deadly/painful diseases like polio, tetanus, hepatitis B, smallpox, diphtheria. Oh, and the Bible didn't refer to Science nor how to cure these diseases did it? Bible not the naswer for everything uh?

  • @FateMaster2 lol you dumb ass I cant belive you only look to the ten comandments for the answer you lazy bum if you haven't noticed that the bible is one big jigsaw puzzle o well you cant find all the comandments in the first testament you have to scavenge for them. o one other thing their are places in the bible that give you massive tips about a healthy life style too bad nobody understood it until it was too late and people stopped with the bible and went to health class for the same stuff

  • @spacezombies1 yes and a lot is just crap or even unhealthy. And don't say david was rigth to send a husband to the frontline to get to the future widow.. Thats a story compilation which has truth and may set a direction but the basic path is peace, tolerance, freedom and hope for everybody.

  • Yeah right on! If you're not throwing them in jail, barring them from serving in the military and trying to "cure" them, you're CONDONING everything they do. M I rite?

  • I think that telling, that homosexual people have to be killed (as you did,testyvenom with your bible-quote) is extreme intolerant. so you and the bible disprove yourself by preaching both tolerance for all people and homosexual have to be killed..... it is illogical.

    And this "if you don´t know that it is a sin, you don´t deserve to tell your oppinion"-shit... you already toldm that everyone has a free will. so if i decide to believe in other things as you do, i´m less worth than you?

  • It's not a matter of "worth", it's a matter of whether or not you understand the topic of which you are speaking. To say that you "don't know" something and then say "it must not be [whatever]" is to spread ignorance and stupidity and is to show that you have no real intellectual speculation on the matter. Therefore, that person has no significant part in saying what is and what is not. He may still choose to say/do that, but that doesn't mean he should. You are too quick to judge, sir.

  • Also, I don't believe that they "have to be killed". I was just quoting that one to show how extreme of an offense it is considered to be. The punishment is much less today because of how far society has fallen AND because Jesus died for our sins (so they get a chance to repent). Also, that quote is OUT OF CONTEXT. There is more to it than simply saying that all homosexuals must be killed (which isn't true). Please read the rest of the Bible before judging it. You have disproved nothing.

  • you dont really choose to be gay, you are programmed to think someone is attractive and if it happens to be a male then to bad bitch your gay.

  • I'm not saying that homosexuals are bad people. I know a couple, and I think they are very nice and should be respected as people, but homosexuality itself should not be encouraged or condoned. It's disgraceful, disgusting, vile, and wrong. Also, sexual preference is not something you are born with, so there is no excuse for being gay.

  • Uhhh... Sorry... But it IS something you are born with. Studies have shown that homosexuality is related to genetics. =.=

  • There has been no substantial proof of that. It has only been speculation. A speculation, I might add, that was made by a homosexual (so he was biased). The studies were done on the brains of deceased adults. Since the brains of these adults were fully (or mostly) developed, there is no reason to assume that homosexuality is genetic. Also, more reliable studies have shown it is more of a psychological thing than genetic. Genetics may help push someone one way or the other, however.............

  • ..............evidence shows that it DOES NOT DETERMINE your sexuality. That's like saying your genetic structure determines your actions throughout life, and thus there is no such thing as free will or choice, which would make psychology total BS and everything we do would be a product of chance. That's just ludicrous. You and I both know that we are free to make decisions of our own free will. What influences us to make these decisions is psychological, not physical (genetic).

  • How would that work exactly? I thougth to reproduce (pass your gens) a man AND a woman are needed.. so if homosexuality would be genetic how would it come to the next generation?

    Actualy that would be great! If so god must willingly recreate the gene in every new generation. This would show all blasphemie jelling guys there place!

  • I think to get the proper perspective you should ask whether it is a decisions or "programming" some one is "normal". And hey there is same sex sex between animals(same species) too so don't fall for the god has want it otherwise.. and by the way if god could bring the universe to life, create more than a million types of animals and humanity itself it should not be a real problem for him/her to redeem something he/she didn't like.

  • Wow... If you don't KNOW that it is a sin to be homosexual, you really don't even deserve the right to make any comments on the matter or anything related to it religiously.

  • Jap because god can bring the universe and life to life but can not stop some people loveing there own gender.

    So final prove god could create a stone he can not lift..

    Belive what ever you like nobody shall call you nuts but please do not call somebody sick because he loves someone you would not.

  • You couldn't be more wrong, and your grammar/spelling is atrocious, too. For one, it's not sick because someone loves someone else that "I" would not love. Obviously you have no true concept of love because sexual attraction IS NOT love and neither are sexual activities. It's ok to love all people, but it's vile to be homosexual. Also, if people are "programmed", no one truly has any free will and therefore nobody is wrong/evil or right/good, but there obviously are good/evil and right/wrong.

  • So we are down to "your spelling is bad so you must be wrong"?

    Obviously you don't get the point that homosexuality isn't just attraction they love the same way "normal" people do.

    How do you know that homoxexuality is "sin"? I would guess sending a wifes husband to war so he gets killed with the intention to marry her afterwards sould count as sin.. but hey that was David so thats OK right? I love bible quotes *smile*

  • That "David" incident was frowned upon (not condoned). I know that homosexuality is a "sin" because it is stated in Leviticus more than once. Here's a quote: Leviticus 20:13 " 'If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads." Re-read my earlier comments about the subject of "love". It's not exactly the same.

  • so never the less.. if god realy hates part of his creation for what they have become why doesn't he just come and remove this "spot" on his otherwise spotless work?

    My guess? The bible is just a summary of storys combined by men to tell a vision of love, community, selfless help and frindship (and some times there own agenda).

    And from time to time some people trun that message in one of hate and "we belive the right way" nonsense.

    So: " judge not or you will be judged"

  • So you're excusing your inability to understand the Bible by saying it's simply some other random piece of literature that has no truth to it or any true meaning. Great deduction. It's easy to dismiss something when you don't even try to understand it or even learn about it. You really don't help your disposition by typing like a 2nd grader and reasoning like one, too. Actually, I had better reasoning skills at that age than you do now.

  • Interesting when did you plan to show those scills?

    And if my spelling is so offending to you we can change this to my mother tongue easily. Which would be german.

    I didn't say that there is no "truth" in it! I pointet out that the bible wasn't writen by god or even dictated by him. It was writen by men. And was translated several times too. So each of those authors and translators left there own ideas and preconceptions in that book. And of course some of them were homophobic or misogynic.

  • Actually, there haven't been very many translators (at least not ones that translated it correctly). Translation of the BIble is a very strict process. If there is a mistake in it, it is not to be printed and is to be destroyed (back when we didn't just save txt files on computers, now they can just fix any errors). There are no personal "preconceptions" in it. We can match today's Bible to that of text a couple thousand years old and it would have a 98% correct (EXACT) match.

  • The other 2% is spelling (of names) and grammar differences. Just to be clear, the comparisons are in the same language (original language it was written in). Also, to disagree with homosexual activities IS NOT homophobic. That is a common misconception, and just because men behaved certain ways toward women back then doesn't make the Bible misogynic.

  • However, women should do certain things (like obey their husbands). Obviously there are certain points at which that can become abusive and that is wrong. It's all a matter of understanding. If you understand it, you know that the Bible intends and is good. If you don't, you are scared of it and refuse to believe it out of ignorance (usually, some people actually read it and understand it, but they simply refuse to believe it).

  • The Bible is a relativly new book.. most of the original sources are destroyed or lost. It was rewritten, recomposed and edited severel times eg. twice by the Roman Catholic Church alone (they reduced the gospel number to 4) ..

    And for the Old Testament there are languages involved who nobody speaks any more.

    The Apocrypha do contain several "Gospels" which were much closer to Jesu than those choosen (Markus was writen almost 60 years after jesu died (back then this is almost three generations))

  • The Bible is one of the oldest existing pieces of literature. It isn't anywhere near being new. The number of generations has nothing to do with the age of the Bible or anything else. We may not SPEAK some languages now, but we do still understand them. Wherever you get your information from, it is quite incomplete and misguiding. I'm finished wasting my time with you. Please get a real education in this subject before speaking to me about it again.

  • The Bible or parts of it have a very old history and thats the point.The originals are lost or destroyed.The texts which did get into the bible were translated and rewritten and told and writen over and over again..there is no original..just copies of storys once passed verbally.This was one reason for Luther to translate it from latin (and the oldest sources he could get) into a common language. Btw you did not answer: "Why does god not correct it" I guess he doesn't care who or how you love

  • I did answer that question. I just didn't answer it directly. It's a matter of free will. If He simply "corrected" the problem, those certain people wouldn't have free will. If He "corrected" this problem, why wouldn't He just "correct" ALL problems? Because it is up to US to do so. If He corrects everything, what would we be? We'd be virtually mindless beings with no free will whatsoever. I suppose it's like a test.

  • But the fifth commandment prohibits killing in general.. so how is killing homosexuals right?

    So because someone wrote (as long as god did not wrote the bible) to kill/harm homoesxuals you would or you would want sombody else to cross a rule which was written by god. (god has given the 10 commandments to Mose)

    As long as everything but the commandments was written by men the commandments are the 10 rules wich overtrump everthing else written in the bible.

  • lol funny vid...ohand about the offtopic in the comments, I don't care and I don't see the sin in it.....go fuck what ever you like, we don't care (at least I don't)

  • yeah so I can fuck a soda can

  • I dont get it. I dont think it is a sin. beacse its not like they turn away from god and hate himm. they still have the same amounut of resoect for god and everyone else. i have one or two homosexual friends and i love them as i would a regular friend.

  • ?? Homosexuals are actually better than straight people when it comes to friendship. People are just scared, or hate them because 1) religion, 2) redneck, or young jock-unemployed pot heads insult them because they aren't built or want pussy, (vise versa if lesbian)3)society.

    Lay off the homosexuals, they're humans. Why not rephrase the question, would you listen or give a shit about the stakes, if a rapist, murderer, pedophile, said it? So what do you prefer America? Country of 70% grown kids

  • i dont have a problem with the people themseleves.....cause i kno some gay people who are my friends.....but i hate the fact they are homosexual......its zeal.....you love the person but hate the action/sin....

  • You know what I really hate? I can't say a single goddamn thing that is even remotely pro-gay without being generalized as a homosexual. One of my dipshit friends ACTUALLY THINKS that I am gay, JUST because I have said things that are pro-gay. It pisses me off so much.

  • I actually found that funny.

  • i don know, sounds good to me

  • okay

  • Jib jab wannabe, it sux n e ways

  • all i can say is fuck u bush

  • rofl you people make me laugh. yeah yeah suck your demon dicks you retards

  • bull crap video!!!!!

  • what's got your morals in a twist? sheesh, get a grip on reality please

  • i dont care whatevr

  • no...................jk

  • go republicans! but no hay bashing. I'm the biggest republican supproter, but still. Homophobia is wrong. let them make their own choices

  • lolwut?

  • ok.....

    it took me 3 times to see the point, if there really was one.

    and my answer: yes

  • thats gay

  • is the homosexual a republican or democrat?

  • obliviously the homo would me a democrat lol

  • um.... yeah, i would trust the homosexual....

  • Yes I would. Vj2 c4nc 3t p4v s21m.

  • rip off of jibjab!!!

  • Nope

  • LOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOL I've posted this so many times! HA!

  • I kno. it just really really really freaks me out

  • or do we trust someone who can't even say nuclear

  • he says it how it was originally pronounced.

  • never trust a homosexual

  • and why should we not do that? just because they are? That's a pretty dumb reason to risk millions of lives just because you don't like homosexuals. Especially if they have no association with terrorists and has never even done anything to hurt anyone to begin with.

  • My question is for you, is why would anyone trust a Nuclear Bomb in the hands of a redneck.

  • Farrelohana

    ur wrong coz the bible only says one thing about gays and not that they will go to hell

    plus i think he hates you coz fucking that dog in the ass wasnt nice then putting the shit from ur dick down ur mums throat is is sick

  • yes. yes i would.

  • Thes answer is no

  • funny but yet

    stupid

  • LOL! :-)

  • dirty bomb is a lie

    it cant be done

  • What the hell is the point of this..?

  • he doesnt sound like bush at all

  • thats the point

  • ????? WTF lol haha

  • ??????????

  • *SNORE*

  • Moooonkey !!!

  • the truth hurts huh?

  • For God's sake, stop calling President Bush a monkey!

  • well i suppose people should stop calling Bush a minkey, it gives monkeys a bad name

  • did u say the yanks are shit? U MEAN THE REDNECKS ARE DON'T U? THEY NEED TO SPEAK PROPER ENGLISH! example> instead oF replying to someone . DO WHAT NOW? U SHOULD SAY EXCUSE ME? this is just one of hundreds i can give you.. bye yal'll...dumbass

  • oh fuck off

  • fukin YANKS!! are the worst shit oF the world

  • I love how no one is actually commenting on the issue addressed in this video.

  • I'm going to avoid the political slautering on these comments and just say that it was not funny at all. Its just stupid, but others think otherwise.

  • You can't even spell slaughter.  That must've significantly devalued your opinion if it is worth anything at all.

  • that monkey hhhhahhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­ahhhhahahahaaaaaaaa bush look like a little war monkey

    (^-^)

  • Have you ever read the picture book series "clueless george." It's a spoof of curious george depicting george bush as a war monkey king.

  • I AGREE! i mean all he dose is ''lets send more trops to iraq!,'' and a another quote he said is!''CHILD CARE! WHO CARE ABOUT CHILDREN I WANT TO RULE THE WORLD! NOT DO WORLD PEACE!

  • well i'd rather have a homosexual than bush.

    so yes i would.

    and WTF!!!!!!you could've had a better question to ask.

  • For all you stupid bush supporters. I hope your happy that the Iraq war cost every US family $20,000. You shouldn't consider your self republicans because real republicans don't support government wasting. Consider yourself a brainwashed idiot. And i think these people will be going to hell for supporting a war that has killed thousands of innocent people.

  • yay

  • we're not fighting for freedom. Iraq did absolutely nothing to endanger our freedom. So, yeah, if we were fighting for freedom, some might have to die. The fact is, we dont have to be there and we dont have to let people die.

  • And it's not like we can afford the Iraq War since were headed for stagflation.

  • I'd like to see you say that if you're family was dead, turbotaco

  • You could have thought of a much better question

    -like this one: Why is it that none of you have the balls to impeach me?

    How glorious it would have been.

  • THATS A GOOD QUESTOIN

  • Would you really rather have Cheney? Would you really??

  • INDEED!

  • I think that we would surely be damned if we let a homosexual translate it so we would be better off letting millions die! :P

  • wasent expecting that. got a laugh out of it

  • Wow how original. At least you didn't add sound and completely rip-off Jib Jab... You unoriginal bastard.

  • Bush is out of touch with the American people. War for profit.Our troops in Iraq getting killed for the profiteers! What a horrible President!

  • He's a lot better than the SCANDAL KING, BILLARY. At least under Bush's watch, the threat of Saddam Hussein was eliminated. Billary can't say that. Billary was a horrible president, and now she wants to run again?

  • The threat of Saddam Hussein.... last time I checked, when they found him and killed him it made things worse for us. Where do you get this idea of "Billary," Bill Clinton was a great president, the scandal was a personal issue that one woman decided to make public so that she could have her 5 seconds of fame. Why would Hillary still be with Bill if there wasn't something truly there.

  • And its great that we have such experts on the affairs of Iraq such as yourself, where you by any chance there during Nov 05-Nov06...we may have ran into eachother

  • a lot of people minipulate clintons statistics saying that he brought us in to a surplus and bush Jr brought a deficiet. In fact it was Bush Sr. That managed to raise the surplus so that it peaked at clintons election and started to decrease till its lowest point in the middle of bushes 1st term. Hes trying to build it back up

  • Nobody is discrediting Bush Sr., but you cannot say what he did in his presidential term compensates for the crap Bush Jr. did in his term. However you are discrediting yourself, for creating these words "MINIpulate" "deficiet". I'm getting chills thank you very much.

  • this video is lousy.

  • LOL

  • heh!

  • Rule #1 of fighting a war. If you don't like the "front" that the enemy has chosen, then you start another bigger one somewhere else. Realize that the most important thing that the war in Iraq has done is cause the consistent front to be NOT IN NEW YORK! Whether you like the current admin or not, you must thank them for knowing and doing this. As long as the terrorists don't realize Rule #1, they'll keep sending their insurgents to Iraq and not New York or Los Angeles.

  • that is because bin laden is using insurgancy tactics to bleed us economically in Iraq in much like he did when he bleed the Soviet Union economically in afghanistan (while he was part of the mujahadeem)

    it worked then and it is woking now, nearly half a trillion dollars lost and counting (costofwar dot com)

  • The United States can reclaim the lost money, thank you. Osama Bin Laden is DEAD. If he was still alive, we would be seeing enough of him to make a movie the size of LotR. He loved being on camera.

  • osama and iraq? are you high?

  • thanking them for starting a war for profit and killing thousands of amrican troops..........are you high too?

  • War started when radical extremists figured out modern day society doesn't line up with their beliefs, so all infidels must die! On 9-11, that war was brought to American soil. It would have stayed in New York, if someone didn't take it elsewhere. 9-11 =3000 civilian casualties in one day. Could've been 80,000 civilian casualties, if the buildings were full as they usually are. When would the next 1 of those types of strikes have been, if the war wasn't taken to Iraq? So yes. Thank you.

  • iraq had nothing to do with 9 11 you moron....even that idiot bush said that.......if ya want to have a battle of wits with me at least have you facts straight....IMPEACH BUSH NOW!

  • This is what you consider a battle of wits? Making a statement with no support and then calling me a moron? You win.

  • a terrorist is not the same thing as a soldier in an army. a terrorist doesnt need a base of opperations tied to a national government, a terrorist can still come here any time. going to Iraq has not put terrorists on the defensive

    several terrorists are even using growing anti-american sentiment in Iraq as a recruiting tool

  • You're theoretically right, but where have they attacked in the last 6 years? Mostly Iraq (& then 1 in Spain & 1 in England. Yes, they are probably trying for other things, but the data says the 1s that are blowing up things, are blowing them up in the middle east. The majority of their "attention" is on the Middle East. Hate works. It blinds. When you hate something so much (Americans) and they are on your doorstep, you kick them out 1st b4 you pursue them in the next country.

  • WRONG!! Many other terrorist attcks have happened!

    For example:

    At least six people of middle eastern descent have come through the canadian border, English railways have been blown to bits at least three times, and who knows how many people have tried to jack planes since then! THIS WAR HAS NOT STOPPED TERRORISM, AND IT WON'T!! EVER!!

  • Brilliant. XD

  • If you really want to sink your teeth into facts rather than the wet dream of aparanoid right winger like SicLuce research the ties between the Bush family and global oil, most especially the Saudis (remember where most of the 9/11 killers were from).

  • I think the answer is surely. Just as a test to dumbasses,lol That video can be interpreted different ways. One is very funny.

  • THIS IS THE FUNNIEST SATIRE I'VE SEEN IN YEARS!!! Whats with all the political rants... It's a fucking joke people! LOL!

  • what the heck's "chinagate"?

  • awesomesauce

  • haha that was funny........cnn will censor the questions pretty hard, good luck getting this to air

  • LOL, FTW!

  • Damn, now I'm going to die.

    It's been nice everyone. Have a great life!

  • Ha ha, nice job. I hope this makes it.

  • That is a lousy impersonation. But I think that you dream of Bush enough that you should have it down by now. If you hate bush you must love the wood.

  • Bush is a homo so do we have a choice?

  • What a waste of time to see a wanker like Bush, the worlds greatest terrorist.

  • HAHAHAHA!