Added: 4 years ago
From: chummychambers
Views: 322,001
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (240)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • my dogs ass looks better than that pitch jeeeeeez!

  • Who made the wicket? Some fucking retard?

  • umpire definitely bribed by the fielding team!

  • my backyard have a better pitch then this :P

  • Wide ump Wide! That means arms up as if pointing to a quarter to three

  • this is jokes becauseif everyone trying to be smart in the comments lol

  • watch?v=6fZNAy9Vrfk

    

  • absolute hilarious vid!

  • what kind of madest ball is this it's look like their r playing with tapetennis ball

  • what kind of madest ball is this

  • Lol umpire is asleep

  • abosolute shite

  • balls 2 and three werent wides.

  • looks like scott boswell made a return -

  • i cant remember why i clicked on this. i mean i knew before clicking it would be pathetic and guess what?? it is

  • the first ball was wide but the others wernt wides

  • This is a beautiful bit of trolling. Just settle down. If you see what runs on the bottom on the ticker-tape, it's quite clear it's a wind up and all of you have risen to it beautifully.

  • what a load of rubbish. post this on youtube? you should be banned. still... bad umpiring. he must have thinking of his afternoon tea and a bit of bowls!

  • maddest? more the most SHITTEST balls in cricket EVER. Fucking wasters

  • ????

  • Well that's 1:17 of my life I'll never get back. Epic Fail. The most epic fail of all time.

  • hahahahaha you all fool. this is test match

  • Its a Test match u dont get wides on the leg side in a test match....its called negative balling though but thats legal in test....

  • wtf??..........they were playing test match and none of them were wides

    in test matches the region of wide ball is much bigger than in ODI

  • maddest ball? more like the maddest and shittest over ive seen for a long time! as he heard of line and length?

  • @Jackgunner1 I think you misunderstood the video.

  • fuck u.......!!!!!!

  • If the rabbit with the bat hadn't sprinted towards off he'd have had an easy shot down to leg. Poor dear was obviously worried about getting a nasty bruise from a bowler who looks no more intimidating than my gran.

  • I know nothing about cricket...Thank fuck!

  • this must be from Pakistan...

  • @jagdpanther1944

    why is that....you dont have computers and editing software in your country

    Anyway it seems a primary school kid made the first video clip

  • I don't think so the last one could be wide, but definitely first two were! if it were a One Day Game !!!

  • Comment removed

  • I'm glad I watched this .. now everything I watch will seem interesting.

  • thats controversial lmao without doubt being no balled for a illegal action should be undisputed

  • its not technically the maddest ball in cricket u moron he spinned it to hard so they were wides dum ass i want my 1:17 seconds back

  • this umpire was actually banned after too many complaints last season ha!

  • u dumbass wides are never considered in a test match

  • I can't see a real problem - the ones down the leg side aren't too serious, asking to be guided to the boundary. The short ones on the off side, cut/smashed away! I dream of facing bowlers like this :-)

  • wow, village cricket at its most heated

  • last ball should have been cut, batsman facing should wait before walking across his stumps and then could easily play the first 2 away on the legside

  • @xplosiv54 wow thank you mr Tendulker

  • omg douche this is obv a club match, i play 1st and 2nd team cricket and there not reeli wide, only in cup or 20/20 is a leg side ball a wide and the offside ball could easily have been cut

  • best scene 1:18

  • I used to use a Diablo... quality bat!!!!

  • I agree with BROOKS39......nice try though buddy

    

  • mate it depends which division its from/....

    division 4-5 they are not strict on wides... that looked exactly like that to me..

  • Thats 1 min 17 seconds of my life i wont get back!!!

  • worst video of cricket(same pinch)

  • its a test match nd look at the boundaries trees lol must b a club match

  • I just wasted 1:17 of my life. This must be some amateur game. The umpire is probably the bowlers dad who probably didn't have the heart to call a wide.

  • Is this meant to be a joke? "Smuggled away from the ground in the middle of the night"?

  • THAT UMPIRE IS CRAP !!!!!

  • What a shit bowler...

  • this is the most stupid vid ive seen in a long long time!

  • it was a test match hu cares

  • What kind of game was it though, was it limited overs? That can make a difference.

  • its not a hard leather ball dummy

  • MAN ITS A TEST MATCH FOOL.u DONT CALL THOSE WIDES!

  • LOL I think we know which side the umpire's bread was buttered! I've spent my 23 year club cricket career watching umpires do this sort of thing. If all of the cheats I've encountered were video'd and shamed on You Tube, the server would crash. The funny thing is, umpires like this always say "I'm consistent for both sides" - yeah, consistently ignoring the rules, and if the other umpire is doing it properly, you get an unbalanced game.

  • so whats the story here? the umpire was shit? so what?

  • wow who gives a shit seriously. u smuggled this out of a cricket game? what a fucking loser...or wanker or whatever u english fools say

  • English people are dumb

  • dumb assholes like u shud be banned from youtube....no wonder ur video was reported bogus first....v gotta report this 1 too u dumbo!! looks like ur seeing cricket for the 1st time...wat ru a fucking american retard????

  • rofl he's not wearing a helmet

  • superb video superb song superb sixes superb catches superb wickets. 5 star video....

  • ha ha ha ha....now u have got wat we call as 'sense of humor' ; )

  • gay

    low life

  • judging by the white colour uniform they are wearing, it looks like a test match played on a club level. In test match at this leve the umpires are very lenient with wides. i play club cricket and our umpires do the same.

  • Strictly speaking, a ball is only a wide if it is thought that the batsmen had no opportunity to score runs from it (ie it was unhittable) - a village umpire with village players should not be giving many wides if the ball is inside the return crease when it crosses the line of the wicket.

  • You're so upset about 3 wides that you post it on youtube..... Thats really sad, I have been given out 4 times this season when i haven't been out (not including LBW's umpires have the best view) and you don't see me posting a video on youtube saying there is some umpiring conspiracy against me!

    And Btw that pitch looks like it should be doing everything! And your complaining about 3 wides! whats wrong with you!?

  • what a load of crap ..

  • can be a test mattch

  • Looks like a game of cricket in the park? Who cares?? What are they playing for???A case of beers????

  • Comment removed

  • Who cares? Maybe the person who uploaded it?

    I don't see any tags or comments from the poster saying MUST WATCH CRICKET VIDEO FOR EVERYONE IN THE WORLD WHO LOVES CRICKET.

    Not everything that is posted on YouTube is put here especially for you. Move on.

  • than u go out in the middle without protection face a 100mph ball u idiot

  • @RoadhouseKiss ok mate, you stand 22 yards away, ill throw a cricket ball at your dumb head, and then well see whose the fucking pussy.

  • Technically, all could be given as wides but village umpires are notoriously bad at this. I've seen many umpires over the years who hardly ever give a wide down the leg side, even in league games. The trouble is, these guys are volunteers and without them most village league sides get docked points, so you can't do with them, can't do without them!

  • yes it is a wide if it goes down leg stump

  • Only if its a limited overs match. first class obviously but umpires are more leaniant :)

  • not in a test match dumbass

  • no thats exactly wat happens in first class cricket u idiot

  • they are wides any ball down leg side is wide unless it hits the stumps and the last one was way to far on the off side it was crap umpiering

  • not in first class cricket

  • onley in one day cricket is it a wide if it goes down leg stump

  • stupid video.

  • it looks like a test match...and these arent wides....good umpiring

  • This actually made me laugh. Good quality of the video.

  • damn ump obviously didnt feel like going thru the hard work of pulling his arms out of the damn jacket and signaling a wide...that too much to ask from a frickin Brit

  • the point of this is?

  • i wanna know why that fodder wasnt dispatched into the local chip shop! fetch me a kebeb while yer there! put some chillie on it!

    i once ran a single and was called 1 short by the ump. lol.

    thats why club cricket is mint.

  • who gives a shit.

  • yawn

  • wat he hell u on about?? smuggled from the ground in the middle of the night?? hahahah. the wides weren't called! we see bad umpiring everywhere

  • its sarcasm mate

  • Third ball was not a wide, certainly not in non-limited overs cricket (I know they are not wearing colored shirts, but that doesn't prove anything). The second was questionable, but would definitely be a wide in limited over cricket. I do not see why such a big deal has been made on YouTube over these incidents.

  • the 2nd and 3rd balls i woulndt of called wides

  • i would call the second one a wide because he constantly played it on leg

  • *Third

  • Wth

    The thrid One Wasn't Even A wide

  • whu gives a rats ass if they not called umpires do that all the time.

    NOBODY CARES!!

  • no one gives a fuck. you have no life posting this on youtube. If this was a international match i would care but its some kids playing a club match

  • @menec4

    Thank you.

  • LOL..as if this were some ashes...who are these kids playing? And whose backyard is this?

  • Who Cares ! ! ! ! !

  • He's got a very good action, just needs to straighten up. He's almost there, and quick enough.

  • @mikekingphoto wow, you clearly know fuckall about bowling then (y)

  • they r using a red ball dude, its a test match. krapp..

  • @danishrm

    No, it isn't.

    It is a one day club match.

  • plzzz flag it

  • You ppl FuCk@@@@

  • Why are we talking about tests anyway.

  • wat a load of crap...

  • Hey! Don't you know that Test matches of cricket don't have wide as a technical term. What is called a wide in a limited over match it is called a ball in a test match and no extra runs or balls are given.

  • There are wides in test.

    It just has to be wider than in a one day game.

    It's rather simple.

  • yea thats true those balls which were bowled were not wide because it is a test match and in a test the ball has to be really wide to be called one.the person who posted this has alot to learn about cricket!

  • @thunder951357

    No.

    It's not a test match, it is a one day club match played in Shropshire, a county in the UK.

    The fact they are wearing whites doesn't make it a test, they aren't called wides as you get far more leeway in club cricket.

  • well why didn't the batsman say anything??

  • they are using a red ball thats wat made me say this is a test match

  • @thunder951357

    The match really wouldn't work with a white ball, would it.

  • but thats wat they use in one day cricket....and why didnt the batsman say anything to the umpire?????

  • Oh fail. Even in a test that first ball would be called a wide. The second, not so much, and the third is absolutely fine. And test matches are the long 5-day international matches. Domestic games are usually called by their title, i.e. County Championship match.

  • fuck you....!!!!

  • Haha the footage had to be smuggled away from the ground in the middle of the night. Someone is taking these shit players/teams way too seriously imo

  • wow. Some people have WAY too much time on their hands..

  • i wish icould rate o stars

  • you suck

  • give up the game your shit mate.

  • yeah, I'd call that three wides in a limited over match

  • What makes you think I'm Australian?? Look at the vid! What I say is actually correct. Is that Stuart Broad, Is it the Oval?

    And to fill in the gaps of your drug addled memory WE won the ashes and I got to see every minute of it live on free to air because I live in Australia. So I even got to gloat too.

  • WTF, this is nothing, played by nobodies in no match or test?? Its just nothing about nothing. Who are these people? what was this test? Just a bunch of fuckwit amatuers and its only because I'm drunk I'm even commenting on this nothing bollocks.

  • shut the fuck up spagboll4ever you australian loser.

    btw spag who won the ashes? i cant remember :P

  • you guys have nothing better to do.

    Fake video

  • who given the permission to post all those kind of bakwass..,gos knows

  • most boring video on youtube, who really cares about how controversial you thought it was. Because it wasnt

  • wtf..thts waaaayyy wide

  • All deliveries look playable to me. No way are they wides.

  • agreed

  • TheBeerwulf - wht are u talkin abt? the first 2 are dbig time wides!!! ck ure eyes!

  • The first two weren't wide. Look at the ridiculous move the batsman makes as the bowler bowls.

    If the batsman stays in his stance, they go right to him. The first hits him on the back of the calf or misses by a balls width. Similarly The second hits him on the toes.

    Can't tell on the third, but it looked on an OK line the batsman can hit that with a cut shot.

    What's the problem?

  • umpire has to check his eyes....

  • Wait, since when does Mitchell Johnson plays village cricket and bowl right handed?

  • lol

  • wtf

  • i dnt get it, tht wuz obviusly village cricket and not a test match but wat happend?

  • At least one of the balls was a definate wide. That's what - it's way too overhyped and no doubt an in-joke with the village sides.

  • bowler balled wide ball, but umpire didnt call it wide ball, get it?

  • This is one of those's annoying bowlers that spray the ball about all over the place, then get you out with the only ball they bowl straight all day. i no cause it's happened to me...

  • yep, spot on there mate, happend to me just a week ago, bowled nothing but wide, and sporadic ball's then ball's a peach of a yorker to me..

  • Humblebro: If you knew your cricket you would proberbly know that most spectators at a village cricket game are sitting in or around the pavilion..certainly not behind the bowlers arm. And how do we know theres not a wide mid off/mid on. we can only see one certain angle...

  • If anyone knows cricket they will see this vid is FAKE. First of all, there are no spectators visible on the ground, and most importantly there are no other fielders visible on the field either...nice try guys.

  • worst vid on youtube

  • the first mistake you made was watching this video. why do u making mistake again by reading the comment....wat the fuck !

  • some umpires only give wides if they do not think the batter is capable of hitting it for example say a batter has been hitting balls as wide as them all day without trouble he wouldnt neccecerially give a wide because in there eyes its not wide to the batter if that makes sense to you

  • Not even sure that the first is a wide, as the batsman moves well across his stumps. They can only be given if it is wide from both where the batsman is when the ball passes him and from his original stance.

  • In four day cricket, balls down the leg-side are not automatically wide. The margins for wides are bigger in four day cricket than one day cricket. The first ball may have been wide but the other two weren't.

  • It's a test match.....remember you don't have wides in test matches....

  • oh dear, of course you do!!! what if someone bowls it 20 yards wide?

  • It's not a test match. It's club cricket. And given their they're wearing white, it's either a 4 day match or village cricket. Therefore the leg balls probably are not wide. I wouldn't call the off ball wide either.

  • You still have wides

  • Sorry but those leg side wides cant be disputed, especially the first one! Also this is all irrelevant as he should have pumped this guy all over the park wide or not!

  • The leg side balls weren't even wides. You can get away with a lot worse than that in village cricket

  • even in village cricket they were wides!!!! u must play true true pathetic village cricket if they were not wides

  • It's amateur cricket where leg side balls are not automaticallyt wides... The bowler is also shite.

  • i am 16 and play surrey cricket and lancashire....i currently bowl at around 74 mph on a very good day....i want to be pushing 80 by the time i am 18 so does anyone have any tips which could help me to up my pace... thankss..!

  • yeah dont look for advice on youtube!!!!

  • Learn to throw it like Malinga, it should get your mph up in no time.

  • u need to be able to sprint alot faster and when u do sprint make sure u use ur arms as u get faster at sprinting ur arm muscle will be getting better and u should be getting to 80 in a few weeks if u do tht

  • NOTE: it is a test match, not all the balls going out of leg stump is given wide. and see the angle of the video.. these balls are actually not wide..

  • Nice bowling mate keep it up NOTT! :L

  • maaaan you soooo suck dick!

  • The reason 'they' didn't want us to see the video was because it was rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr­rrrubbish

  • and you are just a fucking moron, like to see you get the wickets of 708 tail enders... which they clearly werent!

  • is the umpire his dad?

  • bullshit

  • waste of time

  • when i umpired at cricket the first i would of called wide the second i would of called wide too , because the bowler knows what he,s [ doing ] he,s not dafted the last one is OK , if you bowl a foot and a half down leg side i would call a wide , if you bowl between two or three feet down the offside i would call a wide