sickliberal, i'm needing some clarity. what exactly is meant by 'do some research for usable clips' mean? i am totally supportive of 'low-tech' "solutions" such as the ones Amy Smith mentions (google TEDtalks((amy smith)). but i have little or no interest in supporting the investigation into how to make current culture sustainable. anything fueling overpopulation, war, Laws, and the use of cheap labor to perpetuate what we already have is not a world i want to continue living in.
Not only leaving the wilderness alone, by which I think you mean not raping and murdering it, but we also need to build a solid relationship with the wilderness again, so that we can enter back into the necessary agreements with our communities and assume our responsibilities to the members of our communities, and to the processes that allow us and everyone/thing in our communities to be healthy and balanced.
well i am not into "debunking" people publicly in videos. my problem is that he wants to find out how to make our society continue sustainably, which i think is impossible, rather than wanting to work for something achievable.
mistaspot1, how is my comment on AdamHintz's video impeding progress?
I mean, instead of being supportive you're being critical. Like saying "No slave, you're escaping all wrong!" while many other slaves are sitting idly by, doing nothing.
I don't understand your beef, to be honest. What is your precise issue with his methods? Is it technology? You said agriculture can exist without civilization. Why can't technology?
I think liberalviewers intentions are honest and true, but I think I see where you're coming from, too, Z. Increasing the efficiency of our energy might just lead to more population, thus we run into the same problems just later on. I think we can do both, changing the enrgy we do use and are dependent on AND learn to live off the grid, as it were.
I really think reducing our energy consumption is really to only way things will come to sustainability. If we have any surplus it will become a mouth to feed.
sickliberal, i'm needing some clarity. what exactly is meant by 'do some research for usable clips' mean? i am totally supportive of 'low-tech' "solutions" such as the ones Amy Smith mentions (google TEDtalks((amy smith)). but i have little or no interest in supporting the investigation into how to make current culture sustainable. anything fueling overpopulation, war, Laws, and the use of cheap labor to perpetuate what we already have is not a world i want to continue living in.
bbbleaver 3 years ago
Not only leaving the wilderness alone, by which I think you mean not raping and murdering it, but we also need to build a solid relationship with the wilderness again, so that we can enter back into the necessary agreements with our communities and assume our responsibilities to the members of our communities, and to the processes that allow us and everyone/thing in our communities to be healthy and balanced.
ItsFilthy 3 years ago
Word. Verb.
AdamHintz 3 years ago
i wish the people involved with the Walking the Walk channel knew what the hell they were talking about.
zzz33333 3 years ago
Oh snap! :D
AdamHintz 3 years ago
They know what they're talking about.
You should probably stop impeding progress.
mistaspot1 3 years ago
And by progress you know I really mean regress.
mistaspot1 3 years ago
You should debunk him in a video.
I can't see where his logic is flawed.
Weaseldog2001 3 years ago
well i am not into "debunking" people publicly in videos. my problem is that he wants to find out how to make our society continue sustainably, which i think is impossible, rather than wanting to work for something achievable.
mistaspot1, how is my comment on AdamHintz's video impeding progress?
zzz33333 3 years ago
I think he's right about what we need to do.
But I know we won't.
Weaseldog2001 3 years ago
I mean, instead of being supportive you're being critical. Like saying "No slave, you're escaping all wrong!" while many other slaves are sitting idly by, doing nothing.
I don't understand your beef, to be honest. What is your precise issue with his methods? Is it technology? You said agriculture can exist without civilization. Why can't technology?
mistaspot1 3 years ago
I think liberalviewers intentions are honest and true, but I think I see where you're coming from, too, Z. Increasing the efficiency of our energy might just lead to more population, thus we run into the same problems just later on. I think we can do both, changing the enrgy we do use and are dependent on AND learn to live off the grid, as it were.
ozjthomas 3 years ago
I really think reducing our energy consumption is really to only way things will come to sustainability. If we have any surplus it will become a mouth to feed.
AdamHintz 3 years ago
If people could see through the 'money delusion' and assess value accurately, it would be a big help.
This "i need to burn 30 gallons of gas, in order to get my little pieces of paper, so i can survive" sh*t is just crazy.
dnHooligan 3 years ago
Right on. Walk away from money.
AdamHintz 3 years ago
I don't know too many people, but I know 4 people who have 'smart' cars ordered. I'm thinking, 'is it a palomino or an apaloosa?'
dnHooligan 3 years ago
That's so funny!
AdamHintz 3 years ago
I just don't understand what people are talking about anymore.
It just freaks me out that the word 'sustainable' is used in a car commercial...and that so many people will swallow this BS.
dnHooligan 3 years ago
Everything we try to do may get co-opted by larger interests for a different goal. We need to be able to adapt to them quicker than they adapt to us.
AdamHintz 3 years ago