Sadly, in all its glory, Bismarck was formed for evil, Germany had the edge, they could of dominated the world. The Germans sank the Bismark, it was not the British... The hull is found to be fully intact besides damage from scuttle charges, the Germans sank their own ship, she same way how they sank their whole WWI fleet, it was for honor. Rather sink and go down, than rust away...
@forwardbias I would agree it was formed for evil But according to Baron Von Mulleheim Rehberg and josef statz bismark was sinking if slowly from torpedo hits approx several they should k now they were there Bismark had many design faults radar a bad fault armoured belt first belt design secondary fire power and hull construction fabrication
@spookespook nope ijn yamoto was far superior she was built for pacific not for the atlantic as was bismark. Bismark would have been outclassed if it had met iowa class battle ship and yamoto had 30.000 tons more ship and 18 inch guns against 15 inch on bismark iowa class also yamoto had 336guns5inch also125 1inch 165inch secondary guns and yes japan was thinking about super yamoto class bismark so small
@emanuelev1987 concordo al 100%..... le corazzate italiane (Roma,Littorio e Vittorio Veneto...) non avevano nulla da invidiare alla Bismarck e alla Tirpitz....
L'unico "difetto" era la minore autonomia.... che ne limitò l'utilizzo in mare aperto.
@emanuelev1987 si all'inizio del conflitto sicuramente, poi sono entrate la classe Yamato e Iowa, però non si sono mai afrrontate direttamente sono rimaste sempre come artiglieria per battere le coste prima degli sbarchi d'altronde con lo sviluppo continuo dell'aereo sicuramente tutti si rendevano conto che erano facile bersaglio. Negli anni 20 un generale americano dimostrò con prove a fuoco come la nave da battaglia era ormai superata. Non ricordo adesso il nome ma su internet si trova.
The bismarck whas the dead star in that time ^^
royboy409 4 weeks ago
She was destroyed by the British
scottwins2 7 months ago
Sadly, in all its glory, Bismarck was formed for evil, Germany had the edge, they could of dominated the world. The Germans sank the Bismark, it was not the British... The hull is found to be fully intact besides damage from scuttle charges, the Germans sank their own ship, she same way how they sank their whole WWI fleet, it was for honor. Rather sink and go down, than rust away...
forwardbias 7 months ago
@forwardbias I would agree it was formed for evil But according to Baron Von Mulleheim Rehberg and josef statz bismark was sinking if slowly from torpedo hits approx several they should k now they were there Bismark had many design faults radar a bad fault armoured belt first belt design secondary fire power and hull construction fabrication
motorguzzi100 6 months ago
yeah
kingazteck5 8 months ago
One of the most famous? More like THE famous battleship EVER !!!!
spookespook 8 months ago
@spookespook nope ijn yamoto was far superior she was built for pacific not for the atlantic as was bismark. Bismark would have been outclassed if it had met iowa class battle ship and yamoto had 30.000 tons more ship and 18 inch guns against 15 inch on bismark iowa class also yamoto had 336guns5inch also125 1inch 165inch secondary guns and yes japan was thinking about super yamoto class bismark so small
motorguzzi100 6 months ago
The imperial march? that's an interesting background tune...
Imperialscout2 1 year ago
Bel report camerata!
73puccio 1 year ago
la bismark e la roma..le migliori corazzate del secondo conflitto mondiale..
emanuelev1987 1 year ago
@emanuelev1987 concordo al 100%..... le corazzate italiane (Roma,Littorio e Vittorio Veneto...) non avevano nulla da invidiare alla Bismarck e alla Tirpitz....
L'unico "difetto" era la minore autonomia.... che ne limitò l'utilizzo in mare aperto.
Nico78Scarface 1 year ago
@Nico78Scarface
e il fatto della mancanza del radar fino al 42..
emanuelev1987 1 year ago
@emanuelev1987 si all'inizio del conflitto sicuramente, poi sono entrate la classe Yamato e Iowa, però non si sono mai afrrontate direttamente sono rimaste sempre come artiglieria per battere le coste prima degli sbarchi d'altronde con lo sviluppo continuo dell'aereo sicuramente tutti si rendevano conto che erano facile bersaglio. Negli anni 20 un generale americano dimostrò con prove a fuoco come la nave da battaglia era ormai superata. Non ricordo adesso il nome ma su internet si trova.
giulene 3 months ago
Great video!!!
TheAdolf78 1 year ago