Garry Kasparov vs Judit Polgar 1-0 (Lichthof 2006)

[syeddawdye747]

On 2:40 it would good be able to play Nd7-f6, Qa2-d2, Nf6-g4?, h3xg4, and finally Bc8xg4! skewering the 2 rooks and letting white have a significant advantage in the endgame; Kasparov probably would have seen it considering how good in comprehension of moves he has.

[yedidsion]

I guess Kasparov either felt sorry for her, or he was Drunk!

[EpicPokejohn]

@yedidsion She's 1-12 against Kasparov

[ruisir1]

at 4:38 why didn't he moved the bishop to e4(check)? then black would've resigned as the checkmate was unstoppable

[ItzoSpain]

@ruisir1 That's right , at 4:38 Polgar is mate in 3, both Be4+ and Qe4+  lead to an unstoppable mate in 3 . Hard to believe that Kasparov has not seen this ... maybe she was giving him grief :)

[PabloPena108]

@ruisir1 maybe they were blitzing at this point. He is human after all.

[TheKathrina1000]

Kasparov ją zniszczył i tyle,miazga!!!

[retsel914]

its a mismatch, men is to men, and women is to women!

[TomValedro]

@retsel914 How do you explain judith polgar beating many male grandmasters?

[widebody123]

@TomValedro Great blowjobs?

[widebody123]

Garry Kasparov the ultimate genius of the game of chess.

[eltopadorcitoo]

el mate en 3 es claro, solo que no saben como estaba de tiempo, sabiendo que por el otro camino sin perder tiempo gana de todas maneras, ademas luego hace con el alfil 2 jugadas iguales y termina en lo mismo, y q sentido tiene eso tambien? el tiempo juega muchachos

[eltopadorcitoo]

callate tarado encima que te fijaas en una maquina decis mal el mate en 3, ademas cuando el partido ya esta cocinado no te vas a poner a perder mas tiempo analizando el menor mate sabiendo que de todas maneras ganas...solo las maquinas hacen eso, "juego de maquinas "

[danielrmy]

@eltopadorcitoo para que dar tantas vueltas, ya que se la haya pasado es normal por ser humano... pero si la hubiera visto tan clara no la hubiera pensado mucho para hacerla.. es claro el mate en 3

[JohnnyThunder2]

3:06 - briliant.

[ivalverde993]

4:38 hay mate en 3 por las blancas, no debieron tomar bxca, sino Ae4, en caso de Cxe4, Dxd4 es jauqe mate; o en caso de tapar con torre en f5 Alfil o dama por f5 tambien es mate

[danielrmy]

@ivalverde993 me pareces que tienes toda la razón analizando bn no tenia que dar tantas vueltas mate en 3

[speedBOX34]

@danielrmy

at 4:38 bishop g4 check , knight takes bishop , queen takes knight check , tower f5 , queen takes tower and is checkmate?

[krealillen1]

@speedBOX34 Looks that way me...

[DuctapePenguin]

Brilliant ploy of using the Lichtenstein gambit to reverse fork and trap the knight