The problem with all abrahamic religion is the it is splintered right for the beginning. Different sects, different extremes and of course the three main streams, and one minor, of religion based on this one man made 'god'.
To 'attack' fundamentalism one must eventually come to the conclusion that all forms of fallacious 'belief' needs to provide proof or be consigned to history.
It is interesting to see how the creation/evolution 'debate' has evolved.
i have unsubbed dpr months ago, cant remember why, who cares lol.
Skybinary 2 years ago
The problem with all abrahamic religion is the it is splintered right for the beginning. Different sects, different extremes and of course the three main streams, and one minor, of religion based on this one man made 'god'.
To 'attack' fundamentalism one must eventually come to the conclusion that all forms of fallacious 'belief' needs to provide proof or be consigned to history.
It is interesting to see how the creation/evolution 'debate' has evolved.
philthy122 2 years ago
Very nicely argued video.
raindog951 2 years ago
Are you a member at Dawkins' forum, Nick?
Stringprodigy 2 years ago
I might be, I have joined a fair number of them. I am not sure
BespokeGroupUK 2 years ago
I actually think he brings out his lawyer credentials here.....
He's like thunderfoot where as soon as he start's to move away from creationism he struggles.
greenelf12 2 years ago
But "lawyer credentials" are there to bias opinion are they not? rather then to assist in coming closer to objective truth?
BespokeGroupUK 2 years ago
That's exactly what I meant ;o)
greenelf12 2 years ago
Im glad I "met" you because your intresting,smart and objective.
wolffenhaus 2 years ago
yes OBJECTIVE lol something that's lacking in youtubeland
faszika 2 years ago