Added: 11 months ago
From: SBSTNhungarian
Views: 14,012
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i was thinking this looked like a slow lap for suzuka and i guess im right cause ppl are saying it was a damp track.

  • It would of been perhaps 3/4 seconds faster if the track was bone dry

  • Imagine this thing with slicks... holy shitballs!!

  • @rammeroftabs And with no TC. It would've been epic. Only shit part that year was the overtaking, and even then there was some great battles..

  • what pains for me to say is we are not gonna see v10 or v12 in F1 again but i don't think F1 has reach its peak with perfromance but i dont think in this decade we will see 2004 speeds but when hydrogen powered engines become more powerful and effcient in 15 to 20 years i think then we will see the speeds in 2004 and a few days ago scientists have discovered a material that is microlattice when they full enchance that F1 cars will may lose 50-100kgs so the future is not all bleak

  • notice they are that fast they barley have a chance to go into 7th gear where as now days they bounce on the limit in top gear for like 10 seconds it just shows how fast those cars were with them epic sounding v10s

  • Downshift is 130R ? The old cars is most powerful engine but not aerodynamics...

  • @yakisiklijojuk123 Damp track.. Nuff said

  • @yakisiklijojuk123 they are faster, and for the reason this trun can only be survived driving it with a specific amount of speed so they have to downshift. This Years cars are slower, so they don't need to downshift anymore. Simple.

  • @yakisiklijojuk123 the track was wet when he did his lap

  • God damn that f2004 is fucking animal

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more