Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (72)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOL. Any idea where I can get those good books? When are you going to put up the next part? And being born again is TOTALLY NOT symbolic we are SPIRITUALLY born again NOT like athiests who think it is "symbolic" or "physical."

  • I never bothered to watch your response till now...and I love that you spent 8 minutes rambling on with your ad hominems and empty conjectures to finally get to your attempt of a retort which was an APPEAL TO AUTHORITY! You found a guy that agreed with you and declared that it meant you were therefore correct.

    CRW, I can give you a list of about 10-15 scholars OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD that back me up.

    BTW, your definition of hermeneutics was off too.

  • @KingHeathen Sorry, but you need to pick up a logic text to learn what ad hominem means. There were no ad hominems or "empty conjectures just because you just claim this. And you also might want to look up the fact that an appeal to authority is FINE as long as it is a proper authority. If you could give me 10-15 "scholars" off the top of your head, you would have done it instead of just claiming it. And no, my definition of hermeneutics was not "off."

  • @CRoadwarrior ad hominem...you attack the character of the person instead of their arguments. You did that REPEATEDLY. Go sharpen your spikes and practice your bad impersonations more. The "meat" of your argument is rancid!

  • @KingHeathen No, I did not attack you personally. You claim it. You were refuted soundly and don't even know it. LOL.

  • @KingHeathen You see, unlike you, I don't have a superficial and inadequate understanding of Christianity. I actually have taken a graduate level course in hermeneutics. So I know what I'm talking about from actually studying the topic.

  • @CRoadwarrior You see, unlike you, I don't use a crystal ball to determine what the person I'm talking to has a degree in.

    You don't know jack about what we are talking about and you have proven that REPEATEDLY.

  • @KingHeathen I don't need a "crystal ball" because I have common sense based on what I do know. Just like I know you don't know Hebrew or Greek. How do I know? Because of how you argue in your videos and the kind of arguments against the Bible that you make. No "crystal ball" needed.

  • @KingHeathen What you've proven repeatedly is that you don't have an accurate grasp of Christian theology, you don't know and never did know the Bible in any depth, and your understanding of basic logic is a joke.

  • @CRoadwarrior What's interesting about your assertion here is that you appear to assume that there is only ONE Christian theology. You do realize that even CHRISTIANS can't agree on what the Christian theology is, right? Besides, your theology is meaningless here. The circular nature of relying on scripture to support you fails if the Bible is false. In that case, by your logic, NO ONE is a Christian. And the only joke here is you playing wrestler-wannabe.

  • @KingHeathen Actually, there is but one Biblically sound Christian theology. There has been heresy since Eve added to God's word in the garden. But that doesn't prove that one central truth doesn't exist. There is no true "circular nature" in relying on Scripture, since the Bible was not produce by one human author. And that "IF" is not even valid, since the Bible is not false. There are true Christians, theo ones who have been born again of God's Spirit.

  • @KingHeathen Now the real joke is that you don't get the fact that I'm not a "wrestler wannabe" but an imitator with a purpose. But what is no joke is that a) I know what it really means from the Bible to be truly Christian, and b) I am a true Christian, and c) The Bible is clear that true Christans REMAIN what they were born into. The "joke" is that apparently you never got that.

  • @KingHeathen where is he list? Send it to me.

  • @vesperus1981 If he could have posted his "list" "off the top of his head" he would have already. He likes to posture but his knowledge of Christian theology is of the most superficial nature.

  • I liked the bee slap. But, what was it really? A melted lego?

  • LOL. I thought that was funny too. I think it was a dark piece of plastic rolled up. Looked enough like a bee for me...lol.

  • Road Warrior, I'd really appreciate it if you email me the music on this video. :P

  • Do you mean the name of the music and artist?

  • Indeed. I'll find it somewhere on the Internet.

  • There are some who simply are not worth talking to. I know that is a harsh statement but I look at some of the things that are said just on this video by atheists and combined with my experience on dealing with atheists (especially on-line), what is the point of talking to them? Leave them to God- either He will turn their hearts to be more receptive to the Gospel in the future or He will confirm their unbelief forever.

  • Hey RoadWarrior, great impersonation of Hawk, IMO. I appreciate your tribute to him. Matthew 7:6, (Jesus' own words) says to have discernment; don't throw our treasures to those who won't listen. Some atheists are worth talking to and are respectul, but some will trample what you give and tear you to pieces. I know nothing of KH so I don't know which category he falls into, but we must know when to know when to speak and when to be silent (see Ecclesiastes 3- There is a time for everything...).

  • Thanks, Seventh Stooge. Hawk was cool and even cooler when he became a Christian. I am well aware that some will listen and some will not. And in between are those who are unsure listening to both of us. Part of my goal is to make sure people get BOTH sides, especially a solid and Biblical Christian voice against any atheist voice.

  • An admirable goal, sir, and I mean that. I hope God continues to give you the desire to speak truth even to those who ultimately won't hear.I don't think I have the stomach anymore for talking to on-line atheists. I know we Christians have done a pathetic job of representing Christ to the unbeliever, but OTOH they have done a terrible job of convincing me why I should become an atheist. I do not want to be hateful, foul-mouthed like they are (generally), I have Christ; why would I want Dawkins?

  • I'm an atheist, Croadwarrior, but I must say I like your act quite a bit. I was a big wrestling fan back in the day too.

  • Thanks, badism. I really appreciate that you can appreciate the warrior's attempt to honor Mike "Hawk" Hegstrand and his conversion to Christ.

  • But forget all of that...for now, I want you to take a pause from your closed-minded world view and attempt to see things from my perspective.  You don't have to agree with me...just think from my perspective...

    does not your video push a deeper divide between believers and non-believers...is this the message you intend to send out? That atheists can NEVER BE Christian? Do you really think you will change anyone's mind by telling them what THEY thought?

    Another reason you fail.

  • KH. Closed-minded world view? Really now? If that isn't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is. I never said atheists can never be Christian. I'm saying true Christians can never become atheists. I also am not telling people what they thought. I am speaking the truth of Scripture from the God who knows the thoughts and hearts. No failure here - just the truth, which you apparently can't handle.

  • Actually, you did...I realize that you don't understand that that is what you imply when you say what you do...but it is what you said.

    And you ARE telling us what we think and feel because you claim you've experienced something we haven't...but you weren't there and don't know if our experience was the same. What YOU can't handle is the idea that we both felt the same thing and just like my experience was an illusion...so may have been YOURS!

  • KH, no, actually I didn't. You are making up what is called a straw man. You are claiming I said something I didn't say, and then trying to tare down what I didn't say. You may BELIEVE that I am implying what you think, but I am very careful (as a published author and editor) what I say and how I say it. And as I said in my "more info" section, I don't have to have been there. God was there. I can handle your assumption and believe that you think you had something real....

  • actually,

    1-It's not a straw man because your statements lead to the logical conclusion I presented.

    2-I didn't try to "tare down" that conclusion...I ended it there as you aren't going to understand how that conclusions fits in 500 characters or less and you aren't worth another video response.

    3-you weren't there...you claim God was....did he tell you? If so, can he tell you what I had for breakfast this morning too?

  • 1- I suggest you take a logic course or look up what a straw man is. It's a straw man because you pose an argument that I do not, and it does not lead to the "logical" conclusion you claim just because you claim it.

    2- You did try to refute my point but failed due to your ignorance of the Bible and weak understanding of logic.

    3- Again, I don't have to have been there. God was, and He has revealed in His word the hearts of those who leave as I presented. You have no argument and never did.

  • But in reality, as you have turned anti-Christ and anti-God, more than likely your "faith" was merely professed not possessed. With that said, I will also add that IF you were truly born again of God's Spirit, then you STILL ARE, but in deep rebellion, from which God will correct you (Heb. 12:5-8). If He never corrects you, then again it affirms your illegitimate status. I have had many crisis situations in my faith, and yet I am a stronger Christian for them, NOT an atheist.

  • read your comments in this last one but from an atheist view point....

    I'm not saying you will suddenly agree with me...but perhaps you'll see why we DON'T agree with you...try it and see if you can see the major flaw that I see in your presented case.

    If you can't then understand why I won't waste anymore time on you.

  • KH. I don't care why you disagree with me. You are simply wrong because God says you are.  It's that simple.

  • Actually, let me revise that...you are wrong not only because God says so, but also because you don't have your facts straight, especially when it comes to the Bible. Just from how you argue and present in videos, I can tell that as a "Christian" your knowledge of the Bible was very inadequate and mostly uninformed.

  • But I'm not done with you yet...I have at least one more video to do exposing your Biblical ignorance and irrationality. So much error, so little time to refute it. LOL.

  • Amen, brother Warrior. Way to expose the irrational fallacies of King Heathen and all the rest of the irrational thinking atheists. What these atheists don't understand is that there a difference between being CONVINCED and being actually CONVERTED. A man can be convinced in his mind, but a man can only be truly be spiritually be born again in his heart. The Bible is the authority on true Christian, NOT superficial teachings. ;-)

  • They also don't get that the Bible is the authority on what makes a Christian a real Christian kind of in the same way a science book is the authority on what actual science is. You go to a science book to learn science. In the same way, you go to the Bible to learn true Christianity because the Bible teaches about Christianity. They have no problem acknowledging this with any other concept, but when it comes to Christianity, they turn around and contradict themselves. LOL. It's stupidity. ;-)

  • I didn't realize you finally responded....and I can't decide what's worse...

    That you post this video 7 months late...

    That you are still carrying this cheesy gimmick...

    That you are still talking to yourself proud of your "big words"...

    Or that you wish everyone a "Happy New Year" in MAY!

    Nope, what's worse is that you still don't get it at all. All of your assumptions are still based on ignorance and don't address what I actually said.

    You fail miserably.

  • LOL...Well, the problem is, unlike you, I have a life that involves work and grad school. So how "late" the video comes is not important. The fact that I can act instead of boring people to death with some black background simply talking to people doesn't make what I do "cheesy." Part of the video was "shot" just as the New Year began, hence the "New Year" reference. Ignorance? Let's not go there. I know the Bible better than you in my sleep with half my brain tied behind my back. LOL.

  • The point King Heathen made is that he DID believe. By DEFINITION he WAS a believer. The only difference is that he later on decided that he was believing was irrational. And if the simple act of becoming a non-christian makes it so you never were a christian, then you are saying that something in the past is dependent on an event in the present.

    Are you sure you want to make a statement like that?

  • chinchychilla. Heathen can claim he's a poodle, but his mere claim does not prove anything. He was not a true believer by Biblical definition, obviously. True believers don't become antagonistic atheists. And no, I am not saying what you think. I am saying that Scripture makes it clear that if people profess faith but later leave, it is because ultimately they never really had it. My stance is based on the Bible. Yours is based on experience, which can be erroneous.

  • True believers in the Flat Earth Theory can change thier minds about THAT. But they still had true faith. In the same way, you CAN have true faith in God and then later decide that the idea of God goes against what's seen in science. I mean, the Bible could say that atheists are poodles, but this mere claim doesn't prove anything. What you're doing is trusting a 2000 year old book to know more about Heathen's past than Heathen himself, simply because the book CLAIMS to be written by God.

  • chinchychilla. We are not talking about changing beliefs on questionable beliefs superficially based on the Bible like a flat earth. The age of the various books is not relevant here. What IS important is that not only does the Bible claim to be God-breathed, but there's substantiation for the claim from science (archaeology, biology, physics, etc), logic, and experience. So the point is, God knows better than we do what true faith is, not us.

  • Fine, replace "Flat Earth Theory" with any religion besides Christianity. I was hoping you'd get the point without me using religion.

    I mentioned the ages of the books to point out that they were written by primitive cultures. And no, the truth of the Bible doesn't come into play here, because I am assuming for the sake of argument that the Bible is true.

  • I hate to chime in, but as a fellow Christian (with reservations), I have to say that a little intellectual honesty is required on your part. You're operating on the assumption that your belief system is the same as everyone else's on the planet. If anything, true scripture is deemed to be historically true by testing its claims. No holy book has those credentials. All of the things from sciece, like your computer, are a credit to humans, not God.

  • Intellectual honesty, SRAAG01? I have no clue what you're talking about. I argue on good grounds that the Bible stands above all other "holy books." If you have not really studied the issue, I can recommend some good books on the subject.

  • okkkeyy.....

  • irrational claims ? lol that's pathetic.

    No ratings ?

    Does it hurt to have 1-star rated videos ?

    You may wear that silly costume with spikes to look tough but the "rating disabled" feature shows you're not even a wimp.

    all thumbs down !

  • synsei1. What's truly pathetic is that you have nothing of substance to say with only 600 + channel views since 06. LOL.

  • Are my ratings disabled ?

    No

    I'm not a youtube addict and I just posted a few vids for friends, And I use the comments as a free speech zone where you can thumb them up or down and reply.

    Enable your ratings if you have balls.

    Funny how creationists and religious freaks don't do that most of the time, and disable comments too often.

  • Funny how some people seem to be preoccupied with unimportant matters like "ratings" and ignore the topic of videos. If this keeps up, I will have to start blocking people who ignore the video topic and talk about ratings.

  • The topic ? pff what's your topic ? you spend more than 5 minutes with lame jokes with pre-recorded laughters, showing nothing, teaching nothing, proving nothing and then quoting absurd bible verses to argue for an absurd claim. 1 star is for "not worth watching" and that's what your circular reasoning is. You can block me but please forget me like I already forgot you since last month.

  • synsei1. The topic is clear. Apparently you have reading comprehension problems, as well as problems understanding logic.

  • I said "forget me".

    Talking about understanding, one of these 2 words was too complicate for yours.

  • Heyyy. You don't dictate what the warrior does. If you make silly and irrational comments, I will call you out. Now if you want to be left alone, then LEAVE.

  • I left you 1 month ago... you came back

    ok thanks bye

  • No, you posted a comment then, and I did not have time to get to you and many others. Now that I have time off from graduate school, I am catching up on responding to comments. Bye.

  • Ad Hominem

  • Wonder why you make me think so much of the black knight from Monty Python's Holy Grail claiming victory with both arms and legs chopped from his body and calling his opponent coward.

  • Heyyy...synsei1...Cowardice is as cowardice does. The warrior takes on and defeats all comers... what a rushhhh!

  • If you really believe that people who were in a hard spot in their lives and started to believe in god for whatever reason.. couldn't actually come to a realization that it was all imagined. Then you are quite closed minded and ignorant about the psychology of human beings.

  • coolbeens21. It is dangerous to "believe" in God without a real relationship.  Scripture says the demons "believe," so what's the difference between a demon and a human without saving faith? So, it's not about cultural Christianity or superficial "belief." And I would not make assumptions about what I know about the psychology of human beings.

  • It is difficult to take you seroiusly in this attire

  • misteeq64. Difficult is not the same as impossible. If all there was to this YouTube thing was video, you MIGHT have an argument. But since I do talk about issues with intelligence, scholarship, and articulation, you ignore those things at your peril.

  • their was something intelligent in this video ??????? What was it ?

  • misteeq64. Yes, there was. If it went over your head then I suggest some education about listening and reading comprehension.

  • Shoot i guess i got nothing out of all these private schools my mama paid for . i guess the college degree also was a waste . Before you wonder about my intelligence what dont you take a serious look at yourself .Rambling nonesense dress has if you fresh out of the funny farm

  • misteeq64. People waste private educations all the time. I have more substance in my videos dressed like a pro wrestler than most do in plain clothes. And since you don't even have videos, you might want to check yourself and TRY to pay attention, and try to address the subject of the video. Otherwise, your comments are subject to deletion.

  • dude, you need to take a step back, reassess where your life is heading, and make some changes.

  • Cainer666. What the heck are you talking about?

  • I don't make false claims warrior, it's you that makes the most ridiculous of all claims. I've actually read the bible so that's how I know it's not true. Some endorsement by another delusional character doesn't give it any more credibility than it already doesn't deserve.

    Creation=false (couldn't be more wrong actually)

    Great Flood=sorry, Everest has never been 20' under water (ever)

    You claim to be scholarly but I can tell you've never read anything outside the bible in your life.

  • klank67. You make false claims all the time, even in this latest post. How do you KNOW I haven't read anything outside the Bible? You don't. In fact, in my video slapdown on Dawkins series, I show that I am in the process of reading his delusional book. So you're wrong again. I surmise that it's YOU that hasn't read more than the Bible on the subjects you bring up. There are credible scientists who would disagree with you on ALL the points you raise, and all are NOT creationists.

  • You're funny ... Ive seen your so-called Dawkins slapdown and you don't even come close to refuting anything the good doctor says.

    Its because you have no evidence to support your position.

    I dont sway off topic either, Im merely challenging the validity of your arguments in their entirety.

    I don't know of one credible scientist that would ever sign his name to either of those ridiculous stories ... unless he wants to be laughed out of the lab that is ... real science is based on evidence.

  • klank67. Yes, I am funny. If you can't see that Dawkins was refuted, it only shows either your ignorance or bias or both. I'm not the only one who's called Dawkins to the carpet on his flawed reasoning and errors of fact. I also guess you don't know many credible scientists. You might want to look into Dr. A.E. Wilder-Smith, who has THREE doctorates in science. Science is indeed based on evidence, not evidence plus grand speculation like evolution.

  • I can see that you haven't refuted anything CR and there certainly is no evidence for a young earth either.

    Your Wilder-Smith doctor is horribly out numbered by opinion in the scientific community as well - Ken Miller would have been a better choice.

    Evolution is a fact my friend ... I know that kills you to even think about it but it's the truth.

    I think you're the new poster boy that could replace Venomfangx the way you're going.

    btw, he got a lot of respect out here too ... lol

  • What I can see, klank, is that you don't know much about argumentation and valid arguments. Whether Wilder-Smith is "outnumbered" is another logical fallacy - consensus gentium. Ken Miller is not as educated as Smith, and he's only one man (or was, Smith passed). No, evolution is not absolute fact, and repeating it all day won't make it more true. Even honest evolutionists will admit to the very real problems in the theory. So you can't run that crap on me. I read the literature.

  • You're back peddlin' like mad here buddy. Smith's opinions are not accepted in the scientific community regardless of your fallacy argument ... in fact, it's the opposite.

    The pope said evolution is true ... (this is probably the only instance where I'll take his word for anything) ... he's the top dog CR, are you gonna go against the big boss here? Even he says its true.

    You've read nothing and know it that's why its so easy to mess with you man.

    You can share the stage with PCS now ;)

  • klank67. There's no back peddling here. Scientific fact is not defined by how many accept something. As I said before - consensus gentium. What the Pope says is not relevant to me as a Protestant. LOL...especially when scientists (which the Pope is not) say otherwise, including some honest evolutionists like Dr. Mike Denton. I've probably read more than you (I own over 400 books in my personal library) and what you think is easy is your delusion. Go study some logic and get back to me.

  • Rational thinking is not your forte unfortunately.

    Evolution is a fact and you sir are a primate .... both physically and in your case, mentally as well.

    Now go read something and get back to me when you have something intelligent to add.

  • Actually, I think more rationally than most atheists who talk about it. I have books on "rational thinking" and I study it. So don't try to tell me about rational thinking. Evolution is as much a fact as the idea that aliens in a space ship left evolutionary "seeds" on earth to get us evolving. LOL. I have two degrees and I'm working on a third, so don't talk about mental abilities. I suggest you take your own asinine advice. I have over 400 books in my personal library. LOL...please.

  • No you don't and telling me how smart you are in the face of scientific facts just makes you an even bigger blowhard buddy ..... even if you have 400 comic books to your credit it's safe to say you don't understand what it is that you're reading.

    The whole belief in god is irrational so for you to tell me that you study it is worthless blathering which is all you do ...... now how's that wrestling contract coming along - need a manager?

  • klank67. I'm not going to argue with you over your misconceptions. How many degrees do YOU have? You want to blindly accept as fact what clearly is not, go right ahead. If you want to think belief in God is irrational, go right ahead. But you have no concept of what "rational" means. Making a claim that you can't hope to prove is itself irrational. Now if you want to deal with the topic of the video, then do so. If not, say hello to the block zone.

  • You know Im right so off to the block zone I go? ... believe what I preach or go to the block zone - what a joke CR.

    By the way, Im probably twice as old as you and have a BA, Executive MBA and am currently on scholarship at Columbia University for law ..... which unaccreditated bible college did you say you get your nonsense from again?

    You really need to work on whats real and what's just a bunch of fairytales ... you don't seem to be able to differentiate between the two.

    Peace

  • No, klank67, you could not be more wrong. Check the rules on my page. You go to the block zone for violations. And no, you are not twice as old as I am. I'm actually older than you, if your age is correct on your page. I have two Bachelors and I'm working on a Masters, and all my schools are "accredited," thank you very much. Your assumptions are staggering. The true fairy tales are in your mind that has not researched anything in any real depth regarding God and the Bible.

  • And just so you know, klank67, the topic of this video is ex-Christians and atheism. For the most part I don't engage in long, drawn out debates on topics that have not much to do with the video topic. So, if you don't have a comment regarding the specific topic of the video, your comments are subject to deletion, as stated in my rules on my channel.

  • Glory to Yeshua Ha Messiach Ben David Lord and Savior of the Universe!!!!

  • ROFTL. UR crazy, bro with that Roadwarrior Makeup :D :D All u need now is the mohawk he used to wear. OH WHUT A RUSSHHHH!!!

  • LOL...PY, You gotta know that I considered getting the haircut, but working in the "world" on a regular job doesn't allow me to do that. But I did think about it. Just so you know... ;-)

  • please don't block me man ... it's a compliment that I think you're funny .... (you're also an intellectual Troglodyte but that's what makes you funny.)

  • lol...klank67. As long as you abide by the simple rules on my channel, you'll be fine. The compliment is appreciated, as I do try to bring some humor to some otherwise dull topics, but my intellect cannot be rationally questioned (straight "A" grad student).

  • Don't kid yourself big guy, critical thinking is not your strong suit regardless of your grades from some unaccredited bible college.

    I can safely say this as you have started all your diatribes under the assumption that the bible is actually true and somehow proves itself ... your homework is far from complete.

  • klank67. Ahhh, I think (in fact know) that it is you who is kidding. I am in a fully accredited graduate program. So please take your assumptions somewhere else. I made no assumptions. You assume I did. There is evidence of the veracity of the Bible. If you don't know that, I suggest you do some fundamental reading and find out.

  • If you have evidence that the bible is true then that makes you the first and only one.

  • klank67. It seems you have a nack for making false claims. Why don't you trying a little reading: "Is the Bible True?" by Jeffery L. Sheler. Don't assume. Learn!

  • And please, klank67, I probably do more critical thinking in my SLEEP than you do awake. LOL.

  • dude, go into comedy and leave the intellectual debates to the intellectuals ... you're an embarrassment.

  • klank67. Dude, people living in glass houses should not throw stones. Ponder that...and then figure out how to REFUTE my points instead of making silly ad hominems.

  • All of your claims have long been refuted dude ... you're just comedy to me.

  • klank67. Easy to say, but not easy to prove. So don't sing it; bring it. Or see the block zone.

  • Immediately.... not really. There are new comments approved here that weren't on when I posted mine.

  • djosephallen. Oh? Then maybe I accidentally deleted it. I have done that in the past, since all of the "commands" (reply, spam, remove, approve, block user) are very close together. If that's what happened, then I apologize, since I can't seem to find any pending approval comment from you. If you can remember the nature of what you had posted, you can post it again and it will be approved if it does not violate my rules.

  • I see you didn't approve my previous comment which was not offensive or off topic.

    Coward and hypocrite. Unsubscribed.

  • djosephallen. First of all, I get lots of comments. Second, just because I have not yet approved a comment, it does not mean it will not get approved.  And finally, I am not here for "subscribers." Thanks for the ad hominem and the assumptions, but if you can't have a little patience I can't help you.

  • Oh yeah..I can see that you are overwhelmed with all .......... 7 comments on this video.

    And by the way I unsubscribed for my benefit...not to hurt your sub count.

    Good luck.

  • Yeah...I have over 70 videos and comments to attend to, besides my graduate studies. Give em a break. Don't need luck. I have much more going for me. Interesting that your "unsubscribed" just happened to coincide with your ad hominem and frustration about your comment not being posted immediately. For your benefit? Hmmm.

  • what a moron

  • Hey...you shouldn't talk about KingHeathen that way. LOL.

  • "Hey...you shouldn't talk about KingHeathen that way. LOL. "

    I wasn't, but since you are a christ-tard I forgot I have spell things out for you. You, croadwarrior, are a moron.

  • LOL...I guess that's true because you say so. But the problem is, you have no substantive point to argue regarding the subject of the video. Therefore, from now on all you can do is watch.

  • Keep up the great work Warrior! Praise the Lord!!

  • Volumyn. You're right about one thing. You don't because you don't have talent enough to, thus revealing your hypocrisy.

  • Congratulations on making your religion seem less fake by using bad pro-wrestling style acting.

  • Volumyn...Congratulations on ignoring the salient points made and making an empty claim with no rational or evidential support.

  • Your video had points? Sounds to me like you were just stroking yourself there.

  • Yes, my video had points. Salient ones. Wanna look that word up? LOL. If you didn't recognize the points, you might want to go back to school and learn a few things about listening comprehension.

  • And I really LOVE acting criticism from people who haven't made ONE video doing better. So, if you think you can do better acting, don't sing it - bring it! LOL...what a joke.

  • shalom brother i see you been checkingout on some of the vids on the hebrew israelite i been observing u ure funny i hope u open the eyes and mind of some of these nonbeliever shalom achk

  • Shalom...Yeah, I check out many things over the Tube. Glad you can appreciate the humor because some of these unbelievers are indeed a joke - at least from the perspective of their arguments.

  • Heyyy...gorilla...this is not the place for your jokes that have nothing to do with the topic of this video. Your post will not be approved.

  • Heyyy...Jacena...That's exactly why I have ratings disabled...because of people like you who only seem to care about ratings instead of substantive discussion. Pasting rating stars proves my point.

  • dfarmer1584. Thanks but no thanks. Have a nice time in the block zone.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more