Clean you own home before you try to preach to the well organizBut if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
If trace is a social consturct then by definition genocide is a social construct. So you have these lunatic-logic Liberals screaming about genocide...the wiping out of a rqace...on the one hand and then doing a complete 180 and saying that race is an illusion! WTF! Liberal liars.
Mongoloids (Especially North Americans) Have a wider jaw than Europeans and Africans. Australoids have the largest brow ridge of any other human group.
Europeans have lighter skin, to prevent calcium deprivation, and have the most diversity in hair colors.
Humans have been breeding dogs for a relatively shorter time than the existence of the human species, yet dogs have different intelligence averages among breeds, different sizes and capabilities.
Remember I brought this up on one of the Blogtalk radio shows Cim. We created the concept of race. Color doesn't determine race, we are still considered human.
@neocreativesoul No, obviously color doesn't determine race. Race determines color and much more, far less superficial things. And of course all races are human, just as a great dane and a toy poodle are both dogs, and a tiger and a house cat are both cats. What's your point?
Good stuff. I don't think it's fair to say that past experiments that assumed certain races inferior would affect current ones, though. Neither do I think racial differences are purely superficial. They are, however, minor. The crux of the issue is actually not how minor the differences are, but the fact that subspecies are as much of a taxonomic construct as races are a social construct. They exist purely to categorize details within a single species.
I think a lot of the grounds for distinguishing subspecies in biology are also rather superficial, and I think the reasons biologists don't consider human races to be subspecies are more political than scientific, but I pretty much agree with you. The most significant differences between "races" are probably the shapes of skulls, but I personally don't view humanity as divided into several races. Anthropologists tend to refer to the social construct we call "race" as "ethnicity."
I think you hit the nail on the head near the end. "Race" or "ethnicity" can be used as a practical *yet* rudimentary indicator for a doctor that a patient may suffer from or be susceptible to certain types of diseases. However, the important thing is their underlying genetic makeup. As soon as a quick mapping of a person's individual genome is possible, the need for such a rudimentary indicator would disappear.
Clean you own home before you try to preach to the well organizBut if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
ed.
svennbreng 1 day ago
If trace is a social consturct then by definition genocide is a social construct. So you have these lunatic-logic Liberals screaming about genocide...the wiping out of a rqace...on the one hand and then doing a complete 180 and saying that race is an illusion! WTF! Liberal liars.
HedgehogRebellion 1 month ago
Superficial?
Mongoloids (Especially North Americans) Have a wider jaw than Europeans and Africans. Australoids have the largest brow ridge of any other human group.
Europeans have lighter skin, to prevent calcium deprivation, and have the most diversity in hair colors.
Humans have been breeding dogs for a relatively shorter time than the existence of the human species, yet dogs have different intelligence averages among breeds, different sizes and capabilities.
alexross8 5 months ago
Remember I brought this up on one of the Blogtalk radio shows Cim. We created the concept of race. Color doesn't determine race, we are still considered human.
neocreativesoul 1 year ago
@neocreativesoul
Absolutely.
This guy thinks we should spearate ourselves into sub-species. It's ridiculous.
Cimbolic 1 year ago
@neocreativesoul No, obviously color doesn't determine race. Race determines color and much more, far less superficial things. And of course all races are human, just as a great dane and a toy poodle are both dogs, and a tiger and a house cat are both cats. What's your point?
MaximusRelaximus 7 months ago
Good stuff. I don't think it's fair to say that past experiments that assumed certain races inferior would affect current ones, though. Neither do I think racial differences are purely superficial. They are, however, minor. The crux of the issue is actually not how minor the differences are, but the fact that subspecies are as much of a taxonomic construct as races are a social construct. They exist purely to categorize details within a single species.
PoopShoot1102 1 year ago
@PoopShoot1102
Excellent point.
Cimbolic 1 year ago
some people need the idea of race to feel good, its similar to organized religion.
NubianTribesman 1 year ago
@NubianTribesman
I agree with you. It indicates a great weakness on their part.
Cimbolic 1 year ago
@saaweeet
LoL. :)
Cimbolic 1 year ago
I think a lot of the grounds for distinguishing subspecies in biology are also rather superficial, and I think the reasons biologists don't consider human races to be subspecies are more political than scientific, but I pretty much agree with you. The most significant differences between "races" are probably the shapes of skulls, but I personally don't view humanity as divided into several races. Anthropologists tend to refer to the social construct we call "race" as "ethnicity."
Stargazer5781 1 year ago
I think you hit the nail on the head near the end. "Race" or "ethnicity" can be used as a practical *yet* rudimentary indicator for a doctor that a patient may suffer from or be susceptible to certain types of diseases. However, the important thing is their underlying genetic makeup. As soon as a quick mapping of a person's individual genome is possible, the need for such a rudimentary indicator would disappear.
wimsweden 1 year ago
@wimsweden
Agreed, wimsweden.
Cimbolic 1 year ago
agreed
Steadno 1 year ago