Not like I am an expert, but I think if you would have added more motion blur to the rock columns that break and fly at the camera, it would have really sold the effect.
thats nice! but will u pls tell me about how to produce such kind of effects like explosions ets as i do designing maself and m so much intrusted in that..will be thankfull...(rk8ct_design@hotmail.com).can mail me
I really love this! :D but the lighting on the debris is not right and it should have some more motion blur to look a little more realistic i think . but very awesome.
Well, your main reasons for being against AE seem to be the speed and probably the unstableness? Until recently I hated to composite with After Effects because of it's random crashes and unpredictable render-times (one minute before even starting just a shot of one video over another?!?), then I upgraded to Adobe CS5, and I must say: it is the best update ever. Although the rotobrush comes in handy, there are not many new impressive features. But the speed and stableness was amazing.
Kein schlechter Effekt, wie alt bist du? Ich frag nur weil ich 15 bin (grade geworden) und auch VFX mache, check vielleicht mal bei Gelegenheit meinen Channel aus.
@vfxworld Heyyy, excellent work dude, let me recomend you learn use imagineer system's mocha or motor, for do the rotoscoping in a snap, and the runner, looks weird, cause isnt affected by the light generated by the fire, a couple of masks in a yellow solid in overlay can solve it. good luck and nice job
@MultiJacob123 First: I bought CS4 and right now don't have money for CS5 cause I'll buy 3ds max 2011.
Second: No it is not. Wow, it has some great new features that I don't even think about using cause they are useless. AE is compositing, no FX app for me.
Third: I switched from AE to nuke and fusion compositing software.
I know which softwares are better to use, trust me ;)
Truly inspirational. How long did it take to make the whole comp? Render times, texturing, everything...please provide a total time from scratch to completion. Thanks! LOVE VFX world. Best.
@HANGER187 well, fast preproduction. On set I (as supervisor) took some survery data. Supervised tracking used with suvery data for a good cam track. Postproduction : 3 Particle Systems, 1 Rigid Body system, 5-10 hours creating them. Own Maxscript UI used to speed up particle optimisation. 2 Days working on the AfterBurn Concept, 30 mins/frame render on 25 fps. Compositing, fake reflection in 2 hours, roto in 2-5 hours. Final Render - don't documentated that ^^.
@vfxworld THANK YOU for responding so fast! Genius, pure genius. I salute you. Much gratitude for your kindness, wisdom and sharing your workflow/renders. BEST!
Nice job vfxworld.. to sonic.. it is a lot, but each pass (I think 7 of them) needs to be rendered separately and then then final composite it rendered, so thats really only about 4 minutes per frame per pass, which is not too bad. vfx correct me if I'm wrong.
Hey.. is nich schlecht... nur di fetten brocken die auf die kamera zugeflogen kommen sehen n bissel zu sehr nach cg aus ;-) sonst aber gutes tracking, color correction gefällt mir auch nur dein schauspieler is n bissel langsam^^
das einzige was zu verbessern wäre ist wie hier einer schon erwähnt hat das dein "schauspieler" zu lässig läuft, und die textur der zerbrechenden säule aus 3dsmax.... also damitr es realistischer wirkt..... trz auf jeden fall 5*
Very nice. This is definately your best creation so far. Althought I still think that Fume would've been better than AB, the overall look is VERY good.
Actor is too relaxed (jogging :D) but the effect itself is very nice.
well it's harder ofcourse, but Fume FX has almost perfect engine for any kind of explosion. You have to use some intensity maps and use the 3D version of room as an object to make realistic pressure etc. I haven't touched fume in two months so I really can't tell u how to make it :D but I think it's possible.
Don't mean to be a pest lol but, open up your project file, add a sky light and just see what you think. make they intensity pretty low so theres not to much shadows on the ground but it makes your materials look more realistic to. :)
Hat mir gut gefallen, die Explosion, wirklich große Klasse und auch ziemlich realistisch. Was mir nicht so gut gefallen hat sind die Beton-Splitter die wegfliegen, denen sieht man ihre 3D Polygon Herkunft schon ziemlich an, aber das ist okay so. Ich kann nachvollziehen wie aufwändig die Szene war, deshalb auch von mir 5/5 Sterne.
Nice! Wonder why everyone is german but, Its kinda funny how the guy is like -_- and when the explosion comes he doesnt change, I would exxpect him to be, -_- O_O !@_@! AHHHHHH T_T
Oh, I would have known that better like reading the description... See I always do but it comes down to sometimes I dont want to and I always mess up if I dont.....
xD naja, ich mach schon seid ewigkeiten breakdowns..
Naja, die CC is an meiner alten Tape cam orientiert, lässt das ganze n bisschen mehr cinema-like aussehen. Hab jetzt nich nochmal sein Gesicht gertotoscoped..
Brocken sin nich gut, das stimmt. Ich hab auch noch nie Erdbrocken indoor gesehen xD. Naja, ich bin damit zufrieden.
Ich stimme sehr. Ich mag es aber ein wenig unwirklich. Ich sage die einen guten Job und Ive nie benutzt ein Programm so Auswirkungen bin ich wahrscheinlich nicht richtig beurteilen.
Very professionally done, other then the debri looking 3d, everything is very well done, awsome work!!!! And just to note, even high budget movies do alot of things that look fake, no biggy easy fix for you if you actually wanted to fix it, the shapes are fine, seems like its the lighting of them that makes them look 3d.
Not like I am an expert, but I think if you would have added more motion blur to the rock columns that break and fly at the camera, it would have really sold the effect.
grantpichla 2 months ago
he died.
gabriell16bishop 3 months ago
This is AWESOME!!!!!!!!!
IZITp 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great video keep up the good work.
NewAgeDirector 3 months ago
yea im just going to jog away for that ball of fire coming toward me.
AlaskanEskimo222 5 months ago
Comment removed
DigitalMovieEffects 6 months ago
Comment removed
DigitalMovieEffects 6 months ago
Comment removed
DigitalMovieEffects 6 months ago
What's the best place to get up to speed with 3ds max? I only know the basics like how to create objects lol
Karlobster 6 months ago
so........hes dead?
DJD3STR0Y3R 6 months ago
Perfect! The thing that I am dying for. Does not it need any texturing stuff? And yes, a tutorial would be very very nice.
yassag 7 months ago
Comment removed
DigitalMovieEffects 7 months ago
Comment removed
DigitalMovieEffects 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thats nice! but will u pls tell me about how to produce such kind of effects like explosions ets as i do designing maself and m so much intrusted in that..will be thankfull...(rk8ct_design@hotmail.com).can mail me
irfan803 7 months ago
tutorial plz...???
snakeking007able 8 months ago in playlist Digital Pyro
very nice! dont forget about your light sources to match the real environment too ;)
Sacrengard 8 months ago
VERY GOOD but u need depth of field to make more realistc
DotaAvailable 8 months ago in playlist Particle effects inspiration!
VERY GOOD but u need depth of field
DotaAvailable 8 months ago in playlist Particle effects inspiration!
Please do a tutorial that was seriously epic!
ilovethesimpsons8 8 months ago
how do replace the 3d enviroment from the scene?
xela010894 9 months ago
needs better actor xD if i was that guy, i would pretend, i'll dive near the camera :P
theBOSS3105 9 months ago
the actor REALY isn't good at ACTING! but nice visual fx's :-)
KongPalleDenLille 9 months ago
"A giant explosion, you say?
It's time to jog away at a leisurely pace!!!"
But seriously, great work!
MrFishus 10 months ago
I really love this! :D but the lighting on the debris is not right and it should have some more motion blur to look a little more realistic i think . but very awesome.
GetFamousDesignsII 1 year ago
You are my hero! I haven't posted in a while but your tuts are priceless. Good job on mastering a variety of programs.
MaddogmaxFX 1 year ago
you could use a litle bit of blur and color corrector the debris! it would look way better! but is amazing right now! x)
traceurAlex 1 year ago
Could you do a short lava effect? I've always wanted to see one.
:D
gtamythmaster43 1 year ago 4
@gtamythmaster43 lava is very easy to do with maya fluids.
But I didn't find use for it in any of my shots or films yet.
vfxworld 1 year ago
@vfxworld I know, I mean could you do one? Just so we could see it? Because I haven't found a lava effect any where!
gtamythmaster43 1 year ago
@gtamythmaster43 I have done some, but didn't upload them cause I didn't find some location nearby where I could record the right footage.
vfxworld 1 year ago
@vfxworld AW that sucks...
gtamythmaster43 1 year ago
the fire looks real
but the rocks are cheep
Garone1998 1 year ago 3
Photoshop CS4 Rotoscoping ? whattt???
amartin75 1 year ago 3
RUN FAT BOY RUN
darroni123 1 year ago 2
shame the actor wasnt better, but great effects.
nigel101 1 year ago
awesome
c0no 1 year ago
wow that guy was not terrified to die, he run like nothing was happening
Manikhoshgele 1 year ago 49
Very cool :D
patrysox13 1 year ago
Well, your main reasons for being against AE seem to be the speed and probably the unstableness? Until recently I hated to composite with After Effects because of it's random crashes and unpredictable render-times (one minute before even starting just a shot of one video over another?!?), then I upgraded to Adobe CS5, and I must say: it is the best update ever. Although the rotobrush comes in handy, there are not many new impressive features. But the speed and stableness was amazing.
soimon 1 year ago
Amazing! I want to learn this! AE sucks!)))
mrwhitemanvideo 1 year ago
shit 30 mins per frame! Nice stuff though. Must've taken forever.
JRTET21 1 year ago
bad collor correction
brandtproduction 1 year ago
id be running alot faster than that if the building started blowing up lol
YourADrag 1 year ago
you dont have to tell me the reason, you had me at explosion
:D
JuniorProducer1996 1 year ago
how it took you to make that?
TheExplosivePictures 1 year ago
hey man, would you like to get a tutorial for this video?!?! peace! GREAT WORK!!!!
3ddreaming 1 year ago
Comment removed
3ddreaming 1 year ago
u shld post a tut of this man... it looks great!
fabiopalvelli 1 year ago
it looks like the person is jogging and not running:)
KhnDotcom 1 year ago
Looks very realistic!
FiImNation 1 year ago
not bad, but cgi effects are not so cool. I love Action Films with real Explosions like
in the 80ies and 90ies
rainarzufall 1 year ago
Kein schlechter Effekt, wie alt bist du? Ich frag nur weil ich 15 bin (grade geworden) und auch VFX mache, check vielleicht mal bei Gelegenheit meinen Channel aus.
LG
Max
dermagicmax 1 year ago
can u make a remodelling tutorial please =) !
nasserdajani 1 year ago
I think the stones were a little less motion blur .. but awesome!
monostroy 1 year ago
☆☆☆☆☆☆
SuperHogni 1 year ago
Awesome work, it seems to be a scene from a big movie !!!!!
quite impressive
loubano 1 year ago
Awesome job! how did you mask the runner out? doesnt seem to be take on a green screen.
errotomania 1 year ago
@errotomania rotoscoping in Photoshop - frame by frame.
vfxworld 1 year ago
@vfxworld Holy shit that was good :)
Ps. the actor (maybe you?) walked to slow, looked fake /unnatural, but Holy s** this was amazing :)
leafblowinSK8 1 year ago
@leafblowinSK8 I'm like 30 years younger than the actor ;)
vfxworld 1 year ago
@leafblowinSK8 Well your kinda beastly, how old are you then?
Anyways this s amazing, i wouldnt know how to even start, and idk evven what Rotoscoping is, im like WTF :p
Truely impressive ;)
-A
leafblowinSK8 1 year ago
@vfxworld Excelent, takes a lot of time , no!?
errotomania 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vfxworld Excelent, takes a lot of time , no!?
errotomania 1 year ago
@vfxworld AMAZING! how long did it take you to rotoscope and can you make ea tutorial on that because i dont know how to
nasserdajani 1 year ago
@vfxworld Heyyy, excellent work dude, let me recomend you learn use imagineer system's mocha or motor, for do the rotoscoping in a snap, and the runner, looks weird, cause isnt affected by the light generated by the fire, a couple of masks in a yellow solid in overlay can solve it. good luck and nice job
richymmx 1 year ago
@vfxworld Why didn't you use After Effects for the rotoscoping, instead of Photoshop?
lashand7 1 year ago
@lashand7 because after effects is much slower and more complicated. Photoshop got more controls.
vfxworld 1 year ago
@vfxworld after effects cs5 is better to use
MultiJacob123 1 year ago
@MultiJacob123 First: I bought CS4 and right now don't have money for CS5 cause I'll buy 3ds max 2011.
Second: No it is not. Wow, it has some great new features that I don't even think about using cause they are useless. AE is compositing, no FX app for me.
Third: I switched from AE to nuke and fusion compositing software.
I know which softwares are better to use, trust me ;)
vfxworld 1 year ago
@vfxworld yea, I maybe its better but I still use after effects for visual fx and 3d max for sepcial elements like road explosions and dirt charges.
MultiJacob123 1 year ago
@MultiJacob123 I see. Well you're doing a lot videocopilot stuff for fun.
But on more complex scenes like I am most times working on, After Effects is just too slow and bad to handle.
AE is also not used on film production level. Most times for small commercials and amateur filmers, but no chance on film production.
vfxworld 1 year ago
@vfxworld yea it´s slow but it´s still good for visual fx and compositing. I want premiere elements to use but I still going to use after effects.
MultiJacob123 1 year ago
@MultiJacob123 it's good for easy scenes. It sucks on complicated composites.
premiere Elements for compositing fx? wtf?!
vfxworld 1 year ago
@vfxworld premiere elements for compositing? no. it´s good for other stuff.
MultiJacob123 1 year ago
@MultiJacob123 omg, so you still cut with AE?
Well, you obviously need to rebuild your complete production pipeline.
I use Premiere Pro for cutting.
vfxworld 1 year ago
@vfxworld that´s what I mean I want premiere pro for cutting... Now I´m using windows movie maker. and that is a baby program...
MultiJacob123 1 year ago
Great. But maybe the shadows and ligthing of the column that explodes could be worked a little better.
lukassstyyy 1 year ago
So awesome! you should make a tutorial!
CATB0XFILMS 1 year ago
that looks complicated
JamesPremium 1 year ago
awesome!
TheDM75 1 year ago
the debris looks really CG, but the explosion itself looks amazing!
TheFXGuy 1 year ago
It's a shame the actor is bad. He doesn't seem too worried about the gigantic cloud of fire coming his way.
GCVos 1 year ago
Truly inspirational. How long did it take to make the whole comp? Render times, texturing, everything...please provide a total time from scratch to completion. Thanks! LOVE VFX world. Best.
HANGER187 1 year ago
@HANGER187 well, fast preproduction. On set I (as supervisor) took some survery data. Supervised tracking used with suvery data for a good cam track. Postproduction : 3 Particle Systems, 1 Rigid Body system, 5-10 hours creating them. Own Maxscript UI used to speed up particle optimisation. 2 Days working on the AfterBurn Concept, 30 mins/frame render on 25 fps. Compositing, fake reflection in 2 hours, roto in 2-5 hours. Final Render - don't documentated that ^^.
All in all around 3-4 days.
vfxworld 1 year ago
@vfxworld THANK YOU for responding so fast! Genius, pure genius. I salute you. Much gratitude for your kindness, wisdom and sharing your workflow/renders. BEST!
HANGER187 1 year ago
Hey are you a professional vfx artist?
viplovem 1 year ago
@viplovem haha :)
Nope, I'm just a young amateur filmer who likes creating visual effects.
vfxworld 1 year ago
@vfxworld Oh cool...im also kind of getting into this stuff. Maybe you could help me? How old are u anyways?
viplovem 1 year ago
@vfxworld you deserve a job making these effects. keep it up. that video was great
STBNY 1 year ago
Hey this is an awesome video nice job... Could we have a tutorial how to make an affect like this are something close to this please????
leviont 1 year ago
That is nice!! But can you give us a tut? (I am a noob in 3d max!)
fxinkeo 2 years ago
I like the videos where ppl show how they managed to make final effect.
nice one.
orzelforever 2 years ago 39
krass !
GmuesFilm 2 years ago
30 minutes per frame of rendering??? gahhh that's horrible! :(
sonicballer8888 2 years ago
Nice job vfxworld.. to sonic.. it is a lot, but each pass (I think 7 of them) needs to be rendered separately and then then final composite it rendered, so thats really only about 4 minutes per frame per pass, which is not too bad. vfx correct me if I'm wrong.
etfometit 2 years ago
well.
it's 30 mins rendering time for the explosion shader only.
The rest was just fast rendering with 15-30 secs per frame.
The explosion shader is what takes rendering time.
vfxworld 2 years ago
Comment removed
etfometit 2 years ago
wow, that is crazy then. Definitely looks good!!
etfometit 2 years ago
Wow great work! Only thing that could have been better was the texturing and lighting of the debris.. but this is fantastic!! :)
5/5
NeonSmokePRODUCTIONS 2 years ago
Hey.. is nich schlecht... nur di fetten brocken die auf die kamera zugeflogen kommen sehen n bissel zu sehr nach cg aus ;-) sonst aber gutes tracking, color correction gefällt mir auch nur dein schauspieler is n bissel langsam^^
Savvatore30 2 years ago
repekt.... echt klasse....
das einzige was zu verbessern wäre ist wie hier einer schon erwähnt hat das dein "schauspieler" zu lässig läuft, und die textur der zerbrechenden säule aus 3dsmax.... also damitr es realistischer wirkt..... trz auf jeden fall 5*
KOundCO 2 years ago
Very nice. This is definately your best creation so far. Althought I still think that Fume would've been better than AB, the overall look is VERY good.
Actor is too relaxed (jogging :D) but the effect itself is very nice.
TomppaXX 2 years ago
if you get an idea of how to make some rolling fire with Fume, tell me.
I think, AfterBurn still is better for those kind of explosions.
vfxworld 2 years ago
well it's harder ofcourse, but Fume FX has almost perfect engine for any kind of explosion. You have to use some intensity maps and use the 3D version of room as an object to make realistic pressure etc. I haven't touched fume in two months so I really can't tell u how to make it :D but I think it's possible.
It still looks awesome.
TomppaXX 2 years ago
Nice work!!...
tadqim 2 years ago
cool explosion =)
icefalldaryl 2 years ago
Nice work....please make a tutorial for this......
nikiebc 2 years ago
Well done!
LoooZaaa 2 years ago
vedy nice!
effectsgroup 2 years ago
sieht nach ner menge arbeit aus ;)
Fusselkaefer 2 years ago
the animation is nice but the actor is too relaxed
if such an explosion was behind me i'd RUN!!!
agerken 2 years ago
nice, but the fire doesnt roll very naturally, but overall great effect.
LightningFireFilms 2 years ago
but who knows how fire really rolls :D
Did you ever see such an explosion in real life? xD
well, I didn't
vfxworld 2 years ago
i dont know, but i think fume fx might contain better results than afterburn in this matter.
LightningFireFilms 2 years ago
wow.
HeapsGoodProductions 2 years ago
extrem schöne arbeit!! sehr viel detail!
VFXTests 2 years ago
fantastic!
santelelle 2 years ago
bro make a tuto out of it..
awesome work..!!
keep it up
okalkushmando 2 years ago
sehr geil hendrik
shixxor 2 years ago
Reflections are great just need to add some shadows, other then that an incredible effect! great job!
TheMatt7000 2 years ago
but think about that:
If there is much light...
Will there be shadows? well, I thought, no. So There are no shadows.
vfxworld 2 years ago
Don't mean to be a pest lol but, open up your project file, add a sky light and just see what you think. make they intensity pretty low so theres not to much shadows on the ground but it makes your materials look more realistic to. :)
TheMatt7000 2 years ago
LOL! armer herr l....du kannst doch nich einfach so unsere schule in die luft sprengen...tztztz
fairy93tale 2 years ago
warum nicht???
vfxworld 2 years ago
Wow! That's sick dude.. Did you use long time to make this? Btw, can you please make more tutorials..?
ivanUshline 2 years ago
oh well.
I don't know how long it takes... I'm working since october, not every day, just sometimes.
as sayed in description, rendering time per frame: 30 mins
vfxworld 2 years ago
Hat mir gut gefallen, die Explosion, wirklich große Klasse und auch ziemlich realistisch. Was mir nicht so gut gefallen hat sind die Beton-Splitter die wegfliegen, denen sieht man ihre 3D Polygon Herkunft schon ziemlich an, aber das ist okay so. Ich kann nachvollziehen wie aufwändig die Szene war, deshalb auch von mir 5/5 Sterne.
MacMave 2 years ago
wow!!! great job
killeros85 2 years ago
wow 100 stars!
GodsendStudios 2 years ago
ah shit.
you can only give 5 ;)
thanks
vfxworld 2 years ago
now THAT was great id say one of utube! nery nice
TDO615 2 years ago
OMG! NICE DONE!
fxinkeo 2 years ago
Nice! Wonder why everyone is german but, Its kinda funny how the guy is like -_- and when the explosion comes he doesnt change, I would exxpect him to be, -_- O_O !@_@! AHHHHHH T_T
Clayguy247 2 years ago
because he is DREAMING
that's the scene. that's his dream. And he is about "o my god, that is not real"
well, but you're right, normally, he should be like "waah" and run like devil is behind him ^^
vfxworld 2 years ago
Oh, I would have known that better like reading the description... See I always do but it comes down to sometimes I dont want to and I always mess up if I dont.....
Clayguy247 2 years ago
Nachmacher :P Das mit dem Breakdown hatte ich zuletzt immer gemacht ;)
Sieht ganz in Ordnung aus, nur die Farbkorrektur wäre mir zu krass. Den sein Gesicht ist vollkommen rot ^^
Und die Brocken kommen irgendwie nicht realistisch rüber.
h1a1l1l1o 2 years ago
NACHMACHER?
xD naja, ich mach schon seid ewigkeiten breakdowns..
Naja, die CC is an meiner alten Tape cam orientiert, lässt das ganze n bisschen mehr cinema-like aussehen. Hab jetzt nich nochmal sein Gesicht gertotoscoped..
Brocken sin nich gut, das stimmt. Ich hab auch noch nie Erdbrocken indoor gesehen xD. Naja, ich bin damit zufrieden.
Und mein Klient auch.
vfxworld 2 years ago
oh, und scheiß youtube mal wieder.
Ich hab ne verdammt aufwändige noise analyse gemacht, um das hier so aussehen zu lassen wie in harry potter.
Upload auf youtube => alles noise weg -.- 1 Tag Zeitverschwendung.
vfxworld 2 years ago
Ich stimme sehr. Ich mag es aber ein wenig unwirklich. Ich sage die einen guten Job und Ive nie benutzt ein Programm so Auswirkungen bin ich wahrscheinlich nicht richtig beurteilen.
Clayguy247 2 years ago
Very professionally done, other then the debri looking 3d, everything is very well done, awsome work!!!! And just to note, even high budget movies do alot of things that look fake, no biggy easy fix for you if you actually wanted to fix it, the shapes are fine, seems like its the lighting of them that makes them look 3d.
mk11174new 2 years ago
Sah ganz klasse aus! Bloß die Brocken kamen irgendwie nicht so gut rüber, keine ahnung an was es da fehlt :-/
GuardianPictures 2 years ago
ich glaube an staub oder so die brocken müssen bröckeln :D
accuratesheep 2 years ago
actually it is amazing!!!! we are waitng for the tutorial :D
doublesob 2 years ago
very nice !
sergioaquilina 2 years ago
very nice. but the debris look a little bit fake, they need more details to be realistic. however very will done
vRallev 2 years ago
AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PearlRoads 2 years ago
really nice!
how much did your camera cost?
NOSC0P3L3G3ND 2 years ago
1200 €
vfxworld 2 years ago
Very nice
sliver37 2 years ago
Wow nice.
MandeepGadgetBoy 2 years ago
This is some very nice work!
By the way what camera are you using in this?
mattydavid13 2 years ago
Sony HDR-XR 500V was used for this.
vfxworld 2 years ago