Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (64)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why did this race hustler, JJ, Obama & Olberdouche so quickly defend & overlook Harry Rieds racist comments about Obama being a "good candidate due to his light skin & lack of Negro dialect"?? LOL!

    Fucking hypocrites! Liberals make me sick! If Ried had an (R) behind his name, it would be headline news & they'd be calling for his resignation & speaking of the "racist party".......LOL!

  • We ALL came from monkeys. Also, dont we have bigger things to worry about than a fucking cartoon? GROW THE FUCK UP!!!!!!!!!!

  • They're not stupid. They know the significance that monkeys have to black people. If we don't nip these problems in the bud, they will grow bigger. We cannot possibly let this slide.

  • Things like this is why people get annoyed with blacks, cause alot of them cry about every stupid thing. I even have black friends that say they get annoyed with it. Even if it was meaning to be racist (which im sure not) , they should still have the right to say whatever hateful things they would like to say. Just watch some of the christians channals, they spread ALOT of hate. We can dislike it, but if you can't live with freedom of speech. Then you're not fit to live here.

  • Freedom of expression and other rights are limited for very good reason. They do not include hate speech or any form of expression meant to harm another human being in any way (which this clearly WAS - I'm not stupid). We have to identify the problem and eliminate it or else it will grow. It is not fair to criticize those who are smart enough to see and raise awareness. Getting annoyed at blacks is not the issue here, although you ought to practice the same tolerance that you expect me to have.

  • The fact of the matter is that this cartoon should have never been published in the first place. The editor and animator both need to pay some sort of penalty for their ignorance. Simply saying that it isn't what they were intending is not enough, and to totally disregard the black community's grievances as silly and immature is a complete slap to the face and in many ways way more offensive than the cartoon itself. It's time to let go of any and all cop-outs.

  • I can get annoyed with them, but im not trying to shut them up. Im just saying alot of blacks bitch over stupid little things and need to grow up. You don't see white people going around bitching over every rap song talking about cracka this and cracka that. Let me ask you this, do you think we should have black history month? Do you think there should be a channel called "black entertainment television"? Do you think christians should have their on channals as well?

  • Considering what BET is now, I say cut it off. I agree with you there. And I don't watch Christian channels either so those can go also. But black history month was made to teach future generations of this nation's dark history of racial conflict. That's what this is really all about. Part of "growing up" is teaching our kids that things like this are wrong, whether done intentionally or not. This is not just a stupid little thing that we're bitching about over nothing. It's about respect.

  • If Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, and the numerous other leaders of the Civil Rights Movement hadn't "bitched over little things" then we wouldn't have made all the progress that we have. Even though we have a black President, we acknowledge the fact that there are a lot of racists salty over having a black man in office who would print hateful things in order to express an opinion that the people voted to extinguish. If the NY Post can't learn to respect EVERYONE'S opinion...

  • ...and acknowledge that there is no more room for such behavior, then it is best for their time in existence to come to an end. I'm not saying that it's bad to have such opinions, but there comes a time when it's best to keep your opinions to yourself. Sean Delonas should've kept his offensive opinions to himself and off of the publication. NY Post should've done a better job filtering such material. If we're gonna move forward, we need to take action against such disrespect.

  • BwaneyFwank responds:

    Why don't you just say that you want the government to restrict the freedom of the press, in other words - you do not believe in the first amendment. Your comments are full of bigotry - you want the government to censor you too?

  • I highly doubt that the First Amendment includes libel or hate speech. It probably does, but that still doesn't mean that the publication shouldn't be penalized for their hatred and disrespect. Freedom of Speech stops when it causes harm to another person.

  • The first amendment does not have limitations on free speech or freedom of the press. Try reading it.

  • BwaneyFwank responds:

    suitsnappy: "... I'm not saying that it's bad to have such opinions, but there comes a time when it's best to keep your opinions to yourself."

    Ever heard of the first amendment?

  • Ever heard of common sense, decency, class, and respect? Neither you, Fwank, nor the Post's owners have any.

  • True. We have a 50% black president now. So, id say racism is fading away from what I see. To tell you the truth, I see more racism from blacks today than whites. But again like I said, you don't hear white people going on the news talking about racism in rap songs. Do you agree is alot of racism in rap? Just listen to the song "100 years" from piles calling white people "pussy ass crackas"

  • See, you must watch a lot of Fox News. You cherry-pick a few songs that say such things in order to prove your point, totally ignoring the millions of other rap songs that never even mention stuff like that. If you listen to today's hip-hop radio, none of the songs even say anything about white people.

    If you think racism is fading away just because we have a Black president, the posts that you make clearly show everyone that racism is still alive and well.

  • I dont watch Fox News, haha. I dont know where you live but here in Florida you get alot of rap songs like that, which are played on the raido.

    Also, you're insane to think racism is still alive and well from whites. If racism is still alive, then it must be the blacks that are keeping it alive. I mean, you gotta be blind to not see that.

  • Well I'm not responsible for what the DJ in Florida wants to play, but I will say that when rappers usually talk about "crackas", it's not in a racist way. It's usually regarding their experiences with crooked cops and shady label execs making their lives harder. Ain't no racism involved. They don't talk about ALL white people; just those specific few. That's not racism.

  • A lot of white people have grown past racism, but there are still white people who are racist. I live next to Orange County, infamous for its biker gangs in Anaheim and skinheads in the mountains of Black Star Canyon (Wikipedia that). Not to mention the KKK in Riverside and San Bernardino. You've got to be blind to think that racism is dead with white people. So who were those people caught trying to assassinate Obama?

    Racism never died. It just evolved into a much more subtle form.

  • BwaneyFwank responds:

    Racism is alive with black people. You're the best example here.

    Please explain what you meant by the 'Oreo' insult about Condi Rice. Tell us about 'black on the outside and white on the inside'. Tell us what that all means.

    Then tell us the difference between the inside of 'white' people and the inside of 'black' people. Tell us what's wrong with the inside of 'white' people.

    Then tell us again how you're not a bigoted racist.

  • I already responded to that. I burned your straw man.

  • Ok well, people can take it as them being racist, just like people can take this cartoon being racist. You don't really know they are trying to be racist till you ask them what they were meaning by it.

  • Even if it wasn't intended to be racist, the cartoon still should not have been published since people could take it that way. So it really doesn't matter what they meant by it - the cartoon is inappropriate. To make the case that there is any argument in favor of this cartoon whatsoever means that you're either totally naive or you think that we are really dumb enough to believe such bullshit, which is much more offensive than the cartoon itself. Bottom line: IT WAS A RACIST CARTOON.

  • BwaneyFwank responds:

    suitsnappy: "Even if it wasn't intended to be racist, the cartoon still should not have been published since people could take it that way. So it really doesn't matter what they meant by it - the cartoon is inappropriate."

    suitsnappy: "Bottom line: IT WAS A RACIST CARTOON. "

    As the resident bigot on here, I guess it should be you who determines what is racist or not. You are the expert on the subject ... bigot.

  • I'm the least bigoted person here. I have friends of many different races. And that is why this cartoon is inappropriate. Any cartoon that is offensive to people should not have even been drawn.

    Your opinions do nothing to prove me wrong. They only make you out to look like a prick.

  • The racial cartoons directed at Condi Rice were offensive. There was no doubt who the target was. You say it was ok for those to be drawn because you hate Dr. Rice. She is the 'Oreo cookie'...

    Let's see ...using your, ahem, logic, bigotry against the black person Condi Rice is ok. Secondly, a cartoon that you only perceive as being against the black person Obama is racism. The ape is not drawn as a likeness to the president, nor is it labelled as Obama.

  • No one cares about Condi Rice. Get over it. You sound like a little bitch.

    And for the record, I think the cartoons against Rice were offensive also.

  • It's got nothing to do with Rice. It has to do with your bigotry and the use of the term 'Oreo' cookie. Feel free to explain to all what you mean when you call a black person that.

  • "No one cares about Condi Rice. Get over it. You sound like a little bitch.

    And for the record, I think the cartoons against Rice were offensive also. "

    Bullshit - If this statement were true, you would have simply said you were offended in the beginning, rather than express hatred toward Rice and call her an Oreo cookie.

  • Do you prefer to explain the use of the term 'Oreo cookie' or just simply admit that you are a bigot?

    It's tough, I realize, what with you calling anyone who disagrees with you a racist.

  • The ape was drawn as an ape, there was no likeness to any politician. You only assumed it to be Obama. Obama did not write the bill - congress did. Why would you automatically assume it was Obama? Why would you automatically assume guilt and label the cartoonist as a racist?

    While you're at it, explain to the other utubers how calling a black person an 'Oreo cookie' is an insult.

    You're not a racist??? Explain the Oreo comment.

  • How many times must we go over this? I explained it already. For you to be going so hard defending this blatantly racist cartoon means that you are either naive or a racist. I certainly hope for the former.

    Even in the non-existant event that there really was no racism in the cartoon, why advocate shooting anyone period? Now we advocate violence? Rappers get castrated by the media for such, now it's ok to say that just because of a legislation you didn't like?

  • "Sean Delonas should've kept his offensive opinions to himself and off of the publication."

    "...rappers usually talk about "crackas", it's not in a racist way. It's usually regarding their experiences with crooked cops and shady label execs making their lives harder. Ain't no racism involved."

    BwaneyFwank responds:

    Odd how you know that the cartoonist is a racist and the rappers aren't.

  • It's not exactly rocket science. I highly doubt that Delonas was oppressed enough by any blacks to make such a hateful cartoon. We all know what he meant. This argument is pointless.

    For you to say that blacks continue racism and bigotry is disproving your own point. It's YOU and people who think like you who is keeping that stuff alive.

  • Clicking the little thumbs and blocking people from commenting is the action of a six year old. I overestimated you at 12 years of age. Any offense to 12 year olds is unintentional.

    You are a simpleton and a bigot.

    Come on to any video that you don't control. I'll continue handing you your empty and vacuous head on a platter.

    Gutless prick.

  • Let me end this nonsense right now.

    I am a bigot. I'm bigoted against racists. I think that's a good bigotry for anyone to have. And quite frankly, for you (and whatever aliases you use) to be going so hard defending this trash makes me think that you are a racist yourself. That's the main reason why I block you, because we as Americans voted to ignore people like you from now on. I'm just showing my patriotism. God bless America, and damn all racism whether intentional or not.

  • Once again you play the race card. Do you ever have an original thought?

    Name the video. Any time, any place. Uncensored.

    Gutless prick.

  • You want to look at racism - look in the mirror.

    Gutless prick.

  • Seriously, this is what you do with your life?

  • Beating liberals senseless with their own words is a hobby. I'm not the one posting the videos and blocking people I disagree with.

    You going to accept the challenge? Or are you going to be King Shit of Turd Island on your own channel?

  • When do you intend to block this account?

    That's easier for you than engaging in debate with someone way above your league. You are an amateur.

  • It's a simple question. Here it is again.

    Do you prefer to explain the use of the term 'Oreo cookie' or just simply admit that you are a bigot?

  • I don't debate with anyone who doesn't know how to do it maturely.

  • You don't debate with anyone who kicks your ass. You simply play the race card.

    It's a simple question. Just answer it.

    Do you prefer to explain the use of the term 'Oreo cookie' or just simply admit that you are a bigot?

  • I don't play a race card. I simply say what it is.

    I'm the one who's kicking YOUR ass. You haven't proven me wrong even once.

    As far as "Oreo cookie", it goes like this. If you're black, be proud of your heritage. Don't be black and act white, and then shit on your own people. Don't work for the people who have been KNOWN for screwing over blacks. This isn't racism; it's about being true to yourself. I have nothing against a white person. Fuck a racist though; he can go to hell.

  • More bigotry.

    What exactly is acting 'white'? Are we not all simply people first? You are maintaining the distinction by colour. Since you do not agree with Rice politically, you question her 'blackness'. That's bullshit ... and racist.

    King once said that people should be judged on the content of their character, not the colour of the skin.

    You are judging by the colour of the skin - apparently there is also something wrong with 'white'. What exactly would that be?

  • There's something wrong with being white when you are really black.

    And I am judging Condi Rice on the content of her character. A proud black person would not assist Bush in such endeavors. Disagree if you like but you will not change my opinion.

    But don't call me a racist.

  • As human beings , the soul does not have a colour.

    You are using political beliefs to define content of character - it is wrong because anyone of differing political beliefs than yours is automatically deficient of character. You have judged Rice that way. Using your standard, any conservative is automatically deficient of character. Bullshit.

    Mr. King did not define character by political beliefs.

  • Standard anti-Bush rhetoric and muddying of the water. Generalization that Bush was anti-black. Try coming up with something specific. Not everyone hates Bush as you do. Rice was in the administration to do a job that fit in with her political ideology. It had nothing to do with her colour.

    Your opinion will not change because of your bigotry. You've bought into the Al Sharpton/Jesse Jackson garbage that you can't be conservative and be black.

  • Being a conservative wouldn't make you any less 'black' than being a 'liberal' would make me any less 'white'. Political leanings are not a race issue.

    Characterizing another black person as an Oreo cookie is a form of racism and is an attempt to control people's thought. Can't you see that? This type of thing is designed to bully people into thinking a certain way. That is not open, honest and respectful discussion of ideas and thought - it is bigotry used to get people in line.

  • You will not change your mind because it is snapped tightly shut. Contemplation of other ideas will not be allowed. You have been indoctrinated in the Sharpton/Jackson mold of what it means to be 'black'. It's BS.

    Your beliefs are partially shaped from fear. If you had looked at conservativism as a youth and believed in it, you would have been subjected to the same criticisms as Rice. Some would call you an Uncle Tom or an Oreo cookie. You would stand out - that takes courage.

  • Most people want to 'fit in' and not be different from the people they interact with. It's human nature. Prejudice is a part of human nature - all human beings have it at some level. Recognizing it and thinking past it to a better ideal is the secret to beating it. Playing the race card is part of the problem. Of course, people like Sharpton thrive on it.

    If you don't like the 'racist' tag, stop throwing it around so casually yourself. You're part of the problem.

  • There is bigotry from people on all sides of the political spectrum. True conservatism is colour-blind.

    Here's a dirty,little secret. The people who have been screwing black people are the Democrats. Do you want a history lesson?

  • Pwned.

    Gutless punk.

  • You pwn yourself.

  • All I've done is accuse you of racism, like you do with anyone who disagrees with you. Unlike you who doesn't back up your charge, I offer your own words as my evidence.

    Do you prefer to explain the use of the term 'Oreo cookie' or just simply admit that you are a bigot?

  • He is blind mentalholocaust - he is blind to his own bigotry.

  • Bwaney Fwank asked me to post this for him:

    You're 100% right suitsnappy. Your own comments are the proof. You are the worst bigot on here.

  • Takes one to know one.

  • Comment removed

  • Sticking to the subject and ignoring all ignorance, I just find it wrong that the same organization that pays Fox News to criticize rappers for advocating violence is the same one paying NY Post to advocate violence against someone who drafted a legislation that they didn't like. Total hypocrisy. And I'd like to see anyone rebut me on that.

  • "Condoleeza Rice is a self-hating piece of shit Oreo so..."

    The subject is racism.

    Care to discuss yours?

  • There are a number of comments of mine directed at you from 3 days ago.

    Pick one and respond.

  • Condi Rice has not only contributed to a political party that caters specifically to people who are not too fond of blacks, but she has also helped contribute to the policies that have terrorized us for the last 8 years. People are less likely to come to the defense of someone who has helped put us thru so much pain as opposed to someone like Obama who was elected to help fix the problems that Bush, Rice, and the others have helped to create.

  • Bwaney Fwank asked me to post this for him:

    What a pantload. Explain how the Republican party hates blacks. Explain what in their platform is racist. Back up your bullshit with actual facts rather than standard left-wing 'Al Sharpton' bullshit.

    How have you been terrorized the last 8 years? How has the administration caused you (or 'us') pain?

    Please explain who 'us' is.

    Blocking comments isn't winning any debate - it is a display of cowardice.

  • "Obama's a terrorist, socialist Arab who wants to spread the wealth!" Maybe not racism against blacks, but racism nonetheless.

    And the Repubs have related Obama to a monkey before. They had Curious George on a T-shirt reading "Obama in '08". Oh yeah, that's so un-racist.

    NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND

    And no jobs or financial opportunities in the economy that Bush and his policies created.

    Case closed.

  • I no longer worry about you right-wingers. You're the ones who gave us Bush in the first place. You people are the ones who put us in this mess to begin with. The masses came together and voted to not listen to you people anymore, therefore I will not either. Your opinions are irrelevant. Especially BwaneyFwank.

  • Are you about 12 years old?

    BwaneyFwank makes some good points. Why don't you respond? Looks to me like you're the bigot.

  • I don't respond because the guy doesn't know how to debate maturely; never mind whether or not we agree. I can make a debate without resorting to cheap shots, attacks, or playing the victim. But if he can't then I refuse to acknowledge.

  • Hell, you should be lucky I'm even paying YOU any attention after calling me a 12 year old. How mature...

  • Olbermann ,being the typical Leftist hypocrite/coward on race matters that he's always been, interviewed a Black racist the way he always does: doing everything to please the hate monger, short of giving him a blow job or letting the phony reverend rear end him, although I'm sure he was dying to.

  • Olbermann,in essence: "Yes SIR,"reverend",THREE BAGS FULLLLLLLL!!!! 'Elloooooooooo!!!! "

  • I wonder if the parent company of MSNBC had created the cartoon would Olberman be incensed? Welcome to the REAL world Neo-Libs. They can dish it out (Bush Bashing) but can't take it. Heather457 and ObamatheblackJFK just BAN free speech they can't handle! Waaaaaaah!

  • Since when did this become a partisan thing? Stick to the topic or don't bother posting here. For real, dawg.

  • Didn't I have comments on here? I guess this debating stuff is pretty easy when you just ignore other arguments altogether, eh suitsnappy?

  • Suitsnappy can't compete in an uncensored forum. He's not bad if he can block comments or delete them. He can click the little 'thumb down' on opposing comments like nobody's business.

  • First of all, YouTube does have spamblockers, you know. Furthermore, I also delete all comments that could possibly be deemed racially offensive, inappropriate, or in bad taste.

    And you see BwaneyFwank and the others are still yapping, aren't they?

  • "First of all, YouTube does have spamblockers, you know. Furthermore, I also delete all comments that could possibly be deemed racially offensive, inappropriate, or in bad taste"

    Why aren't you deleting your own comments? You're hardly the person to determine racism. You can't recognize your own.

  • My hat is off to you for bearing with other opinions. I agree with you on racial hatred. It is wrong. Policies are important not the man, yet my point was BUSH was a fair target for slander. It irks me that Heather456 and others block people then consider themselves enlightened.

  • I have black children so I don't agree with people picking on a skin tone. I also don't agree with people getting a pass based on skin tone.

    When it comes to political cartoons, I don't know what should be illegal. I would hope people would aspire to better.

  • It's a halfway decent start. Now it's time to bring more diversity to the NY Post and fire those who allowed that racist cartoon to be published in the first place. If action is not taken, this will happen again. Therefore, an apology is not the end of it.

  • I don't believe that the cartoon was racist. If you interept it to be it means that YOU are the one who equates black people with monkeys. Pelosi was the one who wrote the bill, why no outrage there?

  • You can't POSSIBLY convince me that the cartoon was not racist. Like NAACP Chairman Julian Bond said: you put one and one together, you get two. They couldn't have been out of the loop that long if they're a public newspaper. The NY Post knew damn well the significance of relating monkeys to blacks, and they also knew that the stimulus was commissioned by Pres. Obama. Even if they weren't talking about him, why were they advocating shooting someone to death in the first place?

  • Nobody will convince you of anything because you want to play the race card. You see racism in everything any conservative might do or say. You see racism because you see race before character.

    All it will take is one N bomb here for you to call everyone who disagrees with you a racist.

  • Why not have the paper run everything by Sharpton? Maybe a government 'diversity regulator' could be appointed to censor the paper?

    How did you feel when the NY Times published the racist cartoons of Condoleeza Rice a couple years ago?

    Never heard of them? You mean the liberal media didn't tell you about them?

  • Condoleeza Rice is a self-hating piece of shit Oreo so she herself is more offensive than any racist cartoon. No one's paying any attention to her.

    If the Post hired more people of color, there would've been much more diverse opinions which would've allowed the people running the paper to know what should not be published.

  • Thanks for proving my point. You've never seen the cartoons, but because you detest Rice - it doesn't matter about the racist content. Correct?

    Your whole attitude ensures the continuance of the race problems. The affirmative action mentality you exhibit is part of the problem.

    Do you happen to have the ethnic breakdown of NY Post employees or are you just blowing smoke and hot air while you play the race card?

  • The cartoon uses the story about the chimp being shot to denigrate the intelligence of the people who wrote the stimulus bill - Reid and Pelosi, not Obama. Non-ignorant people know that Obama didn't write the bill.

    Naturally, the left doesn't need a valid excuse to play the race card. It's bullshit.

  • Whether there was racist undertones to the cartoon is known only in the mind of the cartoonist.

    For Olbermann to have a bigot like Sharpton on there makes his show even more ridiculous than it already was. JC Watts characterizes Sharpton and Jesse Jackson as "race-hustling poverty pimps" - an accurate description.

  • "If the Post hired more people of color, there would've been much more diverse opinions which would've allowed the people running the paper to know what should not be published."

    This might be the most ignorant comment you've posted. It gives this message: 'You white people are all naturally racists and need people of colour to tell you when you're being a racist' - What a load of bullshit. You're as offensive as Sharpton.

  • If it's so easy for them to publish a cartoon under the premise that they didn't find it offensive, then they should acknowledge that a more diverse staff would've been able to enlighten those running the paper that some people might be offended by such a thing, which probably would've kept it from being published.

    The most ignorant comment I post drops more knowledge than your most informative comment.

  • "Condoleeza Rice is a self-hating piece of shit Oreo so..."

    Interesting little phrase. This would qualify as a racial insult. You accuse others of racism and use that to insult Rice. Your comments reveal your deep-seated hatred and bigotry toward 'whitey'. Do tell us how much you hate 'whitey' and people like Rice, who happen to disagree with you.

    Keep right on posting. Keep revealing your small-mindedness and bigotry.

  • "Condoleeza Rice is a self-hating piece of shit Oreo so..."

    Let's look at this. You hate Rice because her views differ from yours, so you call her an 'Oreo'. So you insult her by saying she is 'white' inside, or is a white person inside. It must be bad to be 'white' inside, whatever that means...

    How bigoted is that? You believe our souls and skin colour are one and the same?

  • "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

    I agree with this. Don't you? Content of character is what matters. King didn't say 'colour' of character - he said 'content'.

    You've missed the message. Being a black bigot is no better than being a white one.

  • Geez, the guy issued an apology and said it would not happen again. That should be the end of it.

  • I agree. Sharpton and Olbermann are acting like children.

  • Leftists always have, and always will. Which is where their "politics" devolve from.

  • Murdock is a liar!

    He knew what that cartoon depicted, and what type of thinking it displayed and what type of violence it promoted!

    I dont understand how any decent human being can defend this type of backward racist thinking, and I think Murdock should be shut down, as he is an embarrassment to the human race!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more