oh COMMONNNN guysss why you gotta put her breasts into it? let her talk politics.. personally God blessed her with a puuuurty face and some yummy looking booobitas.. so be it.. that shouldnt stop her from making it to the top.. talk politics all you want woman.. freedom of speech ma' fuckkaazz.. that being said she's entitled to speak her mind!! the titties have nothing to do with it!!
FOLLOW THESE STEPS 1. COVER YOUR MOUTH WITH YOUR HAND 2. WHISPER A WISH INTO YOUR HAND 3. POST THIS ON TO TEN OTHER COMMENTS 4. NOW LOOK AT YOUR HAND
Indeed! The conventional understanding of "freedom" has been reduced to the egoistic gratification of the senses through the lower, material appetite. This debasement of the culture has been abetted by our esteemed politicians, as this makes their own corruption in pursuit of power increasingly accepted as normal. The more people that sit on their asses eating Doritos, the happier the politicans become. And remember: the terrorists hate us because of our Doritos-fueled sedentary lifestyle.
While your question is ostensibly a serious one, it is actually a fundamentally flawed question based on a false dichotomy.
You assume that a President has only two choices: his personal preference, or what a majority of the people want.
Actually, the only criterion a President is authorized to use in his decision making is established in the oath of office (Art. II, Sec. 1): to preserve, protect & defend the Constitution.
Actually, Romney comes across as a typical demagogue, the type that currently dominates American politics. I don't believe he looks to the Constitution for any guidance on his policies, nor would he as President. How many of the presidential candidates actually refer to the Constitution as a key factor in the development of their policy or recognize it as a necessary limitation on the power of the federal government in general, and on the Presidency in particular?
Is this real? If I was Obama or one of those candidates I'd hire her to where a tank top that says vote for Obama. Bet he'd win by a land slide!! Down with turtlenecks up with tank tops!!
the American people, in fact i would have most if not all powers from the executive branch nulled or at least evened out to the rest of the branches and would make the public the most powerful thing in this country
Well, I've been thinking that all these guys are assholes who only talk about your breasts but JAYSUS they are nice. No offense. Check your Fair Tax posting.
ron paul said something recently about the fact that often the government's (president's) real job is protecting the minority. the small percent of people that want to say things that are offensive or controversial to the majority, but if their right to do so isn't preserved, we've all lost some freedom. so i guess my answer is, if the majority votes for...off the wall example: legalizing murder (or anything else that isn't right), i would go with what is right over the majority.
Politicians will say all politically correct things to muster support until elections, there after the decision crieteria shifts from public interest or national interest to Lobbying interest. If lobbyist interest doesn't realise what they want,they have quite a few off the cuff tricks like Monika- Levensky or blame with some thing like being holocaust denier, or some thing along those lines.
Ok, I agree. But even if she wore Combat boots and a Moo Moo she'd still be a total hottie. The Glasses, the hair (straight or curly), the strappy tops and her unassuming sex appeal... can you blame some ppl for getting distracted?
If her message was just about the message she would be wearing clothes. There is a reason she shows cleavage in EVERY video. It gets people's attention and distracts them from her mistakes and ignorance.
The Democrats will say they'd do what's right, which is the exact opposite of what they'd actually do. They'll be on whichever side of the issue the latest poll results show.
He was definitely the only one that responded directly. I may not have agreed with his answer, but he was the only candidate even willing to answer and he gets major props for that.
Answer is quite simple,People opinion doesn't count, When it becomes matter of financial interest or lobbying presure.
Business remained usual during VT, cold war or present war on terror. Haliburton and carlyle interest superceeds American aspiration. Neocons and Nazi control media,hard core lobbying to influence governments, People of Saudia,Israel or UK have no right or say.
While I feel that this is a good question in theory and an important one, I wonder if you watched the first Democratic Debate on CNN?
I have a feeling Hillary will, upon receiving this question, avert it and go in to another on of her "I don't deal with hypotheticals, I deal with real problems when they emerge" speeches again.
I missed the last debate. I set my tivo to record anything with "presidential debate" in the title, as that was how the republican one was titled. Unfortunately, it must have been titled differently because it never recorded. I was really annoyed that I missed it.
I really like the question--particularly because it's not a specific "policy" question. I don't know if CNN is looking for specific policy questions or if they are looking for something broader. My personal bias tends toward the latter. Good luck!
I know Bush seldom listens to the American people; however, the American people are not always right. Bush is almost never right, unless you include the right wing.
Oh! That's your best question yet! It's something a president would have to face, perhaps very often, yet would be hard to answer as there is no perfect answer! This is one I'd really like to see answered by each and every candidate in both parties!
This was actually my original sample video. Later I decided that it was just too weird in terms of a debate. As you can see, I then changed my mind about it.
Let me correct that. I asked the question in my original sample video, but then decided that the sound wasn't very good and rerecorded it today. It's something I have been dying to ask a candidate, though I doubt CNN would find it debate worthy.
I think something like this can really show us a glimpse deep inside of the candidate- if they don't have a chance to prepare a good canned answer. So many questions in the debates may be important but just end up getting the same phrases we hear over and over in their commercials and all their campaign stops. I want to hear some stuff that goes beyond specific issues and tells me just what kind of president they'd be!
A few years ago after the fiasco with UAE buying a port, I asked Kolbe, who was one of only a handful of congressmen that voted against the measure, whether the vast majority voted for it because they really thought it was right to ban them, or they were just listening to the constituencies. He said 100% they were just playing to the voters, even if it meant going against what they knew was right.
Then again, the Bush administration does almost everything regardless of what the people want, and that has been a disaster. I don't think that there is a correct or better tactic. Then again, I think it tells a lot about how the candidate makes important decisions.
oh COMMONNNN guysss why you gotta put her breasts into it? let her talk politics.. personally God blessed her with a puuuurty face and some yummy looking booobitas.. so be it.. that shouldnt stop her from making it to the top.. talk politics all you want woman.. freedom of speech ma' fuckkaazz.. that being said she's entitled to speak her mind!! the titties have nothing to do with it!!
vicotrance2007 1 month ago
keep shakin those tits honey. your sure to make it to the white house....... under a desk.
7sourmash7 8 months ago
Jamie from Arizona, you're busty
Cokoholicar 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FOLLOW THESE STEPS 1. COVER YOUR MOUTH WITH YOUR HAND 2. WHISPER A WISH INTO YOUR HAND 3. POST THIS ON TO TEN OTHER COMMENTS 4. NOW LOOK AT YOUR HAND
ellet1215 1 year ago
Are you married? Or, are you taken? Sigh!!! Hearts, hearts, love, love. My kinda girl. ;)
daviduresti 2 years ago
Thanks for the laugh!
McCain reminds me of the Slim Pickens character in Kubrick's Dr. Strangelove: Major "King" Kong, riding the nuclear bomb like a cowboy in a rodeo.
ericcpn 4 years ago 4
It's because of people like him you can sit on your ass an eat Doritos all day long in this nation freely too.
vfgjhj 4 years ago
Indeed! The conventional understanding of "freedom" has been reduced to the egoistic gratification of the senses through the lower, material appetite. This debasement of the culture has been abetted by our esteemed politicians, as this makes their own corruption in pursuit of power increasingly accepted as normal. The more people that sit on their asses eating Doritos, the happier the politicans become. And remember: the terrorists hate us because of our Doritos-fueled sedentary lifestyle.
ericcpn 4 years ago 3
uh?
vfgjhj 4 years ago
Jamie,
While your question is ostensibly a serious one, it is actually a fundamentally flawed question based on a false dichotomy.
You assume that a President has only two choices: his personal preference, or what a majority of the people want.
Actually, the only criterion a President is authorized to use in his decision making is established in the oath of office (Art. II, Sec. 1): to preserve, protect & defend the Constitution.
Everything else is irrelevant.
ericcpn 4 years ago
And who do you think you are? Mitt Romney or somethin?
vfgjhj 4 years ago
Actually, Romney comes across as a typical demagogue, the type that currently dominates American politics. I don't believe he looks to the Constitution for any guidance on his policies, nor would he as President. How many of the presidential candidates actually refer to the Constitution as a key factor in the development of their policy or recognize it as a necessary limitation on the power of the federal government in general, and on the Presidency in particular?
ericcpn 4 years ago 2
lol
utsawin09 3 years ago
judging by your general response, id say fuck the people. they're just a bunch of assholes, anyway.
gu88766 4 years ago
Is this real? If I was Obama or one of those candidates I'd hire her to where a tank top that says vote for Obama. Bet he'd win by a land slide!! Down with turtlenecks up with tank tops!!
ufoabductee 4 years ago
the American people, in fact i would have most if not all powers from the executive branch nulled or at least evened out to the rest of the branches and would make the public the most powerful thing in this country
nathannis 4 years ago
Well, I've been thinking that all these guys are assholes who only talk about your breasts but JAYSUS they are nice. No offense. Check your Fair Tax posting.
olney12 4 years ago
Hahahahaaaaa. You are such a hypocrit dude, lol you couldn't resist to say something about them lol. Right on man.
BloodxGusher 4 years ago
Communist plot?
bluemule24 4 years ago
Sometimes you have to do what is right.Popular opinion amongst democrats in the 1800`s was for slavery.
A republican president fought that despite there views.
FLYR123 4 years ago
ron paul said something recently about the fact that often the government's (president's) real job is protecting the minority. the small percent of people that want to say things that are offensive or controversial to the majority, but if their right to do so isn't preserved, we've all lost some freedom. so i guess my answer is, if the majority votes for...off the wall example: legalizing murder (or anything else that isn't right), i would go with what is right over the majority.
lookitsstupendousman 4 years ago
Political or judicial Decision making is always to safeguard interests of preferred, not necessarily in fair justification.
Hope it explains ?
Fixhist 4 years ago
Politicians will say all politically correct things to muster support until elections, there after the decision crieteria shifts from public interest or national interest to Lobbying interest. If lobbyist interest doesn't realise what they want,they have quite a few off the cuff tricks like Monika- Levensky or blame with some thing like being holocaust denier, or some thing along those lines.
Fixhist 4 years ago
fuck all of you sexist males who are commenting on jamie's cleavage, "skimpy top" and what else. listen to what she's saying, jackoffs!
moosetrck1 4 years ago
Yeah, they should be ashamed of themselves. What happened to the days when they whould just touch themselves in private?
titomartinez5 4 years ago
Ok, I agree. But even if she wore Combat boots and a Moo Moo she'd still be a total hottie. The Glasses, the hair (straight or curly), the strappy tops and her unassuming sex appeal... can you blame some ppl for getting distracted?
cyvais 4 years ago 2
omg Agreed
BloodxGusher 4 years ago
If her message was just about the message she would be wearing clothes. There is a reason she shows cleavage in EVERY video. It gets people's attention and distracts them from her mistakes and ignorance.
Dontesinferno77 4 years ago 8
NOBODY dresses up in Tucosn Arizona. It's too damn hot to where any REAL clothes.
DancingSpiderman 4 years ago
I don't know Donte, I've seen a lot of her videos. She's no slouch. She's got a pretty big brain up there.
cyvais 4 years ago
The Democrats will say they'd do what's right, which is the exact opposite of what they'd actually do. They'll be on whichever side of the issue the latest poll results show.
MatthewPA1972 4 years ago
are you showing all that cleavage because you know Bill CLinton will be in the audience??
bucjason 4 years ago
No, he wasn't in the audience. Trust me, I was looking for him everywhere.
Razela 4 years ago
Do you think that senator obama replied directly to the reparations answer? So far dennis kuccinch is the only one who responded directly i think.
bobo1892 4 years ago
He was definitely the only one that responded directly. I may not have agreed with his answer, but he was the only candidate even willing to answer and he gets major props for that.
Razela 4 years ago
@bucjason Women like her and I can't help we have big boobs and may not even notice it or even approve but thats just the way we are we cant helpit.
Greencloud8 1 year ago
very good, ultimately we need a full democracy where the people vote on the laws and decisions we have to live under.
tedhuntington 4 years ago
A very legit question.
And nice skimpy top.
maleysnemesis 4 years ago
i love your video... nice hooters!
JUNITO84 4 years ago
Answer is quite simple,People opinion doesn't count, When it becomes matter of financial interest or lobbying presure.
Business remained usual during VT, cold war or present war on terror. Haliburton and carlyle interest superceeds American aspiration. Neocons and Nazi control media,hard core lobbying to influence governments, People of Saudia,Israel or UK have no right or say.
Fixhist 4 years ago
Popular opinion was never supposed to matter in court. Only the law was supposed to matter. The problem is that nowadays, neither does.
titomartinez5 4 years ago
so i have no idea what you said cuz im too into those sweet tittes...
calgone93 4 years ago
At times even the people don't know whats good for them.
nowareman 4 years ago
While I feel that this is a good question in theory and an important one, I wonder if you watched the first Democratic Debate on CNN?
I have a feeling Hillary will, upon receiving this question, avert it and go in to another on of her "I don't deal with hypotheticals, I deal with real problems when they emerge" speeches again.
evanschmitt2 4 years ago
I missed the last debate. I set my tivo to record anything with "presidential debate" in the title, as that was how the republican one was titled. Unfortunately, it must have been titled differently because it never recorded. I was really annoyed that I missed it.
Razela 4 years ago
I really like the question--particularly because it's not a specific "policy" question. I don't know if CNN is looking for specific policy questions or if they are looking for something broader. My personal bias tends toward the latter. Good luck!
falsificationism 4 years ago
I know Bush seldom listens to the American people; however, the American people are not always right. Bush is almost never right, unless you include the right wing.
fluideagle 4 years ago
Oh! That's your best question yet! It's something a president would have to face, perhaps very often, yet would be hard to answer as there is no perfect answer! This is one I'd really like to see answered by each and every candidate in both parties!
RogCBrand 4 years ago
This was actually my original sample video. Later I decided that it was just too weird in terms of a debate. As you can see, I then changed my mind about it.
Razela 4 years ago
Let me correct that. I asked the question in my original sample video, but then decided that the sound wasn't very good and rerecorded it today. It's something I have been dying to ask a candidate, though I doubt CNN would find it debate worthy.
Razela 4 years ago
I think something like this can really show us a glimpse deep inside of the candidate- if they don't have a chance to prepare a good canned answer. So many questions in the debates may be important but just end up getting the same phrases we hear over and over in their commercials and all their campaign stops. I want to hear some stuff that goes beyond specific issues and tells me just what kind of president they'd be!
RogCBrand 4 years ago
awesome question. i would love to see this answered.
davisfleetwood 4 years ago
A few years ago after the fiasco with UAE buying a port, I asked Kolbe, who was one of only a handful of congressmen that voted against the measure, whether the vast majority voted for it because they really thought it was right to ban them, or they were just listening to the constituencies. He said 100% they were just playing to the voters, even if it meant going against what they knew was right.
Razela 4 years ago
Then again, the Bush administration does almost everything regardless of what the people want, and that has been a disaster. I don't think that there is a correct or better tactic. Then again, I think it tells a lot about how the candidate makes important decisions.
Razela 4 years ago