Added: 3 years ago
From: CNN911Fakes
Views: 1,127,156
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (3,760)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Now the positioning. The tire was clearly moved since it was blocking the opening in the scaffolding, if you have a hole in the bottom of your tire, then roll it 3 feet is the hole still on the bottom? Also, wouldn't moving the tire result in a different axle position? Idiot..

    As for the ribbons, your pictures are "exposing," if you look very closely you can still see the outline of the ribbon, it's hard to distinguish because everything is gray.

  • More retardation.... Lets see scaffolding. OK, obviously there is construction going on here. If you pause your video at 1:24 you clearly see where part of the ground under / around the tire, doesn't match the rest of the sidewalk. Pause at 1:47 you see even more markings.

    Why you ask? because someone just DUG and these marks show water lines, gas, etc. And the ribbons.. Caution tape when the ground was excavated. Simple explanations for your ridiculous claims.

  • @Trax17032 I use the markings as anchors to show the second tire is in a different place than the first. What claim are you debunking with your comment?

  • I don't think the government would do it for money - they can just print more !! quantitative easing etc ( even though that would devalue the currency ) - the financial systems of the US are not based on gold reserves anymore so hold no real value anyway - its just an IOU. Your argument there is not a good one ... Give me another !

    The people are the enemy of the country ? I'm not sure about that one either - even a fascist dictatorship needs its people to carry out tasks...I can't see why th

  • @EventGraphics The US government does not create nor print any money.

    The currency has been horribly debased.

    That wasn't my main argument.

    Do some research.

  • its the same tyre, but moved slightly. Almost as tho it had rolled from ummm i dunno......the huge wind forces unleashed by the falling towers or maybe some poor bugger fleeing for his life tripped over it..the red marks are a common sight around building sites , indicating the location of underground services or other such mundane things....

  • @TheCatcher70 3 meters is slightly?

    Huge wind forces?

    Poor bugger tripped?

    You got some imagination.

  • Can you please give a reason why the US government would attack it's own people by blowing up a commercially owned building ? There is no benefit at all, is there ? Am I missing something ??

  • @EventGraphics Yes, you are missing something. Start with the history of governments and what their historical efforts have been.

    That ignores the unfathomable amounts of money - literally trillions of dollars - individuals got for this scam.

    By US law, US citizens are enemy combatants; if you are American, your federal reps know that law is on the books and they have never made any attempt to repeal it.

    You are the enemy of state (as am I)

  • @EventGraphics the buildings were not commercially owned,larry silverstein was/is owner or atleast leaseholder for 99 years.the port authority tried to have the buildings condemned for several years before the attacks.silverstein also upgraded his insurance on terrorist attacks shortly before.he also benefitted because of 2 planes, it was 2 seperate attacks meaning 2 seperate insurance settlements.as for the government,they proffit from the unjust wars that this caused.

  • The yellow ribbon is safety or caution tape used in construction. Makes sense that its tied to scaffolding doesnt it? The orange markings on the sidewalk are also used in construction, it's called a Locate. City or gas personal make marks on sidewalks and/or roads during construction to let job foremen and workers know what may lie underneither when digging

  • 9/11 was an inside job, but I dunno bout this little theory of yours.

  • @bruckshot68 This video presents facts, not theories. If you can find no error in the facts, then the conclusions follow.

  • @CNN911Fakes Fact? No, it's a theory. Why? Because, first of all, Where did you get this picture? What is the validity of the source who presented these pics? What you need to understand, there are alot of ppl that will strenghten their claims by lieing. This picture can be a lie. I do how ever believe it was an inside job. Particles of thermite were found in the rubble. Also, building 7 collapsed on it's own with no planes hitting it with an absurd gov't explanation behind it.

  • @bruckshot68 NIST and FEMA. Officially documented.

  • @CNN911Fakes That makes sense, if it was officially posted by them, through them. One day, there will be a massive number of people who too think it was an inside job, and when they do, uncle sam is gonna have a revolution on his hands.

  • @bruckshot68 FEMA and NIST used obviously photoshopped images in their official images, reports and documents; I have uploaded several videos on the subject and have a playlist that might be helpful.

  • So you claim the videos we all watched of a plane slamming into the building was faked also?

    I found no good evidence in your clip.

  • @freethinkerer Did you just wake up? I have several videos proving that the videos we were shown on TV were all fake; you are welcome to view, analyse and criticize them on their boards.

    If you are looking for plane videos, then of course, you found nothing here; this video proves the landing gear was planted. It proves it totally and absolutely.

    The correct question to ask is

    "if there really were planes that crashed on 911, why was airplane debris planted?"

  • @CNN911Fakes I don't see your pictures as proving anything. I debate these conspiracies on Topix and have found no one present any good evidence. I find lies within most sites on the conspiracy theory. Found a blatant one just today. Yet the guy who posted it just changes the argument.

  • @freethinkerer I don't censor and I welcome the finding of errors in my work. Correcting errors only improves what I do; prove that our elected leaders attacked us on 911.

  • @CNN911Fakes Looks like people commenting already showed the problems with your photos and you have little dispute of them. Looks like the first two tires you show are the same corner. You show nothing to verify otherwise. The third tire shows no coincidence that looks suspicious. And if you think they were planted, don't you think they would try to make sure they did not make such coincidences? Don't you think they would take off the ribbon if that was a marker?

  • @CNN911Fakes You infer the government pulled off the biggest conspiracy ever, yet made these mistakes?

  • @freethinkerer Your English fails you.

    My direct statement that our elected leaders attacked us on 911 is not an inference.

    All criminals make mistakes; there is a famous quote from "Body Heat" that applies; find it.

    The landing gear shown here did not come from an airplane crash in NYC.

  • @CNN911Fakes So you have no way of refuting the objections to your video, so you resort to personal attacks of grammar? You make claims, but do not really show evidence. I see lots of people here agreeing with me. You may convince those who are gullible, but those who expect real, credible evidence are not impressed. Do you believe aliens built the pyramids also?

  • @freethinkerer It is not a typo to say "infer" when someone makes a direct statement. I have proven beyond any shadow of any doubt that our elected leaders attacked us on 911. Some individual videos are weak (this one is not), but i have presented overwhelming, not yet debunked proof.

    Science is not a popularity contest nor is truth determined by vote pluralities.

    Find a genuine refutation; express it. I'm not the least interested in side theories or feelings. The landing gear was planted.

  • @freethinkerer It is not a typo to say "infer" when someone makes a direct statement. I have proven beyond any shadow of any doubt that our elected leaders attacked us on 911. Some individual videos are weak (this one is not), but i have presented overwhelming, not yet debunked proof.

    Science is not a popularity contest nor is truth determined by vote pluralities.

    Find a genuine refutation; express it. I'm not the least interested in side theories or feelings. The landing gear was planted.

  • @freethinkerer It is not a typo to say "infer" when someone makes a direct statement. I have proven beyond any shadow of any doubt that our elected leaders attacked us on 911. Some individual videos are weak (this one is not), but I have presented overwhelming, not yet debunked proof.

    Science is not a popularity contest nor is truth determined by vote pluralities.

    Find a genuine refutation; express it. I'm not the least interested in side theories or feelings. The landing gear was planted.

  • Scaffolding indicates building construction and/or renovation. They're in front of buildings all over Manhattan, over sidewalks ALL THE TIME! They're a nuisance to pedestrians. Anyone who's been to NYC, works in NYC, lives in NYC accepts the common practice of these several story scaffolds. Before they are erected the site must by mapped out on the sidewalks, by civil engineers, marked "in suryeyor's yellow spray paint" and approved by city code inspectors. CNN911 jumps to ignorant conclusions.

  • JESUS

  • why the disney font?

  • what if all your guys theroies saying govt did it is actualy a terrorist plot to make american public think it was :O! lol cant believe i just watched a tire for 3 mins

  • You know, videos like this almost make me laugh if they weren't so sad. You can't compare pictures taken from different angles. Especially considering how far off the angles in these two pictures are. And second, two buildings have fallen in between these two pictures. Gee, I wonder how it could have moved? Assuming of course that it did move. Given the different angles there's no way to properly compare that.

  • So rather than using the name of the street corner to identify the location, someone went around with spray paint to mark the exact spot where the landing gear should be planted and someone else drove around Manhattan in the traffic chaos just after the attack trying to find paint markings on the sidewalk? Then someone else drove around a bit later with another piece of landing gear and replaced the first one? I can even see the tire rip in the first photo on the left side of the tire.

  • @levoidoid Says he can see the rip in the "first photo"

    nah, you can imagine it. It's a different tire.

    ps, they shut down lower manhattan well before 9:00 am; there was no "bad traffic" There weren't any cabs; great proof of people being warned.

  • @CNN911Fakes Your still a lying Asshole, where's your proof. You forget I work in NYC - lower Manhattan, I was there on 911. My bus from NJ dropped me off in front of WTC on Church St at 8:40 (no secret plane parts), 1st plane hit north tower at 8:45 (no plane part on Church & Chambers), half hour later 2nd tower hit. Part of engine takes off corner of bdlg 100 Church and lands on Church & Chambers. Lower NYC was never shut down until the So Tower fell. I was there, my proof your full of SHIT.

  • @henrynevins You're a liar; the plaza was blown at 8:30 and the cops stopped all traffic into the area well before that.

    This video provides facts. Find one I've got wrong.

    I have proven the engine was planted also. Not Chambers, by the way, That is where the disney actress said she could see "jumpers" despite not being able to see the wtc from chambers.

  • @CNN911Fakes Geez, now your rewriting history, the whole world knows when the first plane hit, yet you have your own time line? That's good weed your smoke'n Pal. There's no better proof than being there, I was. Where are you from, been to NYC, EVER? In the plane eng photo on Church & Chambers. Everyone with eyes can see in the photo "Filippos Famous Pizza" look it up, Church&Chambers. Disney actress? where the Fk do you get your info? WTC can be seen from every where, you don't know crap.

  • @CNN911Fakes lol you're a nutty guy, research done..

  • @CNN911Fakes What is that suppose to mean? I'm not clever enough to catch on...

  • @BlakGlasses Read my channel. Do some research. I use the disney font for very good reasons; hating disney (ABC) is high on the list.

    If disney told the truth, we would get a new government.

  • @BlakGlasses

    OMG!

    I also didn't get it the first time but then I remember that I watched another video prior to that one, showing people going out of the building. Then I watched it once more. You can clearly see that the landing gear is not only different but it has a new location like 1 m on the left.

    ...youtube.com/watch?v=jlm7Z6_­6Yyc&feature=related

    Cannot believe either, cheek 3:36. The gear is sitting almost where that elector. post is starting and placed between the last two beams of..

  • @deepuniverse Thanks for the ref to that video. I have never seen it before. Do you know if there is a better resolution copy?

  • @CNN911Fakes

    There was one with a better resolution but I've lost the link somewhere.

    sorry

    if I came across again will send the link.

  • @deepuniverse Thanks. The link you gave referreed back to the original uploader who had in in 480, which I now have. Would like better if I can.

    Thanks for helping with research!

  • @BlakGlasses

    ...of the scaffold. Also the tyre is still a whole pice and u can see the metal part too is different. Thats original footage from people who managed to escape.

    Now on this video here u can see totally different gear and when u compare to the previous video u can see the whole wheel is moved 1 m!!! from its original position, tyre has a big hole, its over the markings, metal part is located in the middle of the electr. post and so on!

    I am no an expert but how this could happen?

  • I hate this fuckin Disney font!

  • @onebadbncr Cool. I hate disney (ABC)

  • lol yes and lets ignore the rest of the "special sidewalk markings" that are to the left and above the tire. There's always sidewalk markings, to indicate where pipes are, to indicate where to dig etc.. it's simple construction. The placement is just a coincidence, why would there be a marking of it? "Place here", really? Where did the tire come from? Who placed it? Where was it hiding? No facts, just assumptions, poor at that..

  • @BlakGlasses When you buy a loaf of bread, do you eat the plastic bag and throw out the bread?

  • If you look close.On of the marking says "place wheel here"

  • Yeah, we're gonna plant evidence, so let's mark it off and make it obvious. That makes total sense. Just like the people that claim no plane hit the towers or the Pentagon by completely ignoring every witness to the events.

  • @panzerwolf494  Thank you very much for saying it. I am one of the thousands of NYC commuter eye witnesses at WTC on 911, yet CNN-Flakes here pulls imagined bullshit out of his ass and craps on anything, ME an eye witness, has to contribute. What I saw goes against his obvious political agenda. Can you imagine him on a jury? Eye witness says "No, Mr Smith didn't pull the trigger", but he ignores it creating his own convoluted bullshit conclusion. Many might call that proof of insanity?

  • Another pointless video from one of the internet's dumbest Idiots.

  • Like the rest of the people here I say F U and your "It was faked" crap, you and the others that put this up need to get a life and your heads out of your Azzes. I pray that god switches you with one of the peole who lost a loved one on 9/11 just so you can see how it feels.

  • @justme1278 switch with 1 of the only 50 same family members(actors) that weve seen over the past 10 years out of 3000 lol.911 is a hoax!!!

  • Being a construction superintendant, I see those red markings all the time. They indicate sub-surface utilities. Red is used to indicate electric. VERY common, specially near what looks like a construction area. I'm not trying to discredit you, or the video, but utilities markings is a much more plausable reason.

    Why is there only one wheel though ? ALL the landing gear on that type of plane uses dual wheels....

  • Fuck All OF you who think that 9/11 was facked u all should dye and go to hell This did happend and we will Never Forget and how the fuck would any body plant that geare there with out someone knowing it and the could not have done it on that day they had all the streets blocked you dumb ass CNN911Fakes FUCK YOU YOU SHOULD BE SHOUT AND SHOULD GO TO HELL YOU DUMD ASS

  • @stormspotter06 Your knowledge fo what happened on 911 is right down there with your spelling and coherency.

    I don't believe anything. this video and over 300 more prove our elected representatives attacked us on 9/11.

    This video proves the landing gear was planted/faked 100%. Yes, that is troublesome as there is no way Osama BBin Laden planted this tire.

  • @stormspotter06 I agree shout them. Bunch of dumb asses. I hope the dye too.

  • You must be an Obama supporter. Go fuck yourself with a nail gun until you die.

  • @taylor5796 Ignoring the fact that the use of vulgarity shows one's ignorance, I woujld live to see the chain of reasoning, basedon this video, you used to arrive at that conclusion.

    ps, I support no one who helped in the 911 attack on America. That includes the person usurping the office of president we sometimes call barak obama. I am even more incensed by the murderer that proceeded him who oversaw the 911 attack on America and added insult to injury by walking on our republic's flag.

  • OMfuckingG I have seen those exact same type markings around Orlando and many of the other cities I drive through daily, and there are three airports between them. Does that mean I should start looking for errant pieces of planes around those UTILITY markings, you fucking dumbass.

    As for the yellow tape on the scaffolding. At least 70 to 80 percent of the scaffolding I have work on or around has some type of tape like that on it

    You have only proven that you're an idiot, your mommy is ashamed

  • @vangion When you buy a loaf of bread, do you eat the plastic bag and throw away the stuff inside?

  • @CNN911Fakes That wasn't even a real response... fucking troll.

  • Not long after 9/11, the Pentagon initiated a fake 9/11 group called, "No-Planers." This bogus laughable theory was promoted as reality and the Pentagon enjoyed dumbasses like this nut job signing on to this Pentagon-based disinfo campaign.

  • @420wellness

    Why.. why these obvious plants (webfairy, Gloria, Haupt, Morgan Reynolds..) wanted so much to turn us away from the No plane thing by acting deliberately as complete looneys.. they were covering-up something.

    Now.. If Holograms (real image and sound projection) have been used.. then their role become obvious and they fooled us with TV fakery and CGI.

    Take a look at this : watch?v=9XnGk9fz8gM (5parts)

    I have no certainty but its more than likely High-Technology was involved.

  • This must be that nut job named Web Fairy.

  • Its really easy to "plant" a 1000 pound object in the middle of New York City without any one seeing you. I bet the goverment is looking for you for figuring this all out. better keep hidding yous parents basement.

  • @keenanorourke0310 I'll bet you never watched the video that includes images that show most people included in those pictures ignoring the landing gear.

  • @CNN911Fakes I guess you think all the firefighter and first responder testimony describing the planes impacting the towers were all lies. You don't get to make this claim since there are audio recordings all over the web of the first plane flying into the tower. You hear the plane coming in and hitting the tower. Haven't you heard that famous video the two French brothers recorded that morning? Explain that audio and video: you cannot explain that audio away as fake.

  • @420wellness I do have several uploads dealing with the lying, complicit FDNY. I also have one or two showing the naudet bros to be the liars they actually are. You are welcome to visit and comment on those videos on those subjects, not here.

    This video deals with the planted landing gear. If you find an error in it, please expose it.

    Otherwise, find videos that deal with the subjects you are interested in and make comments appropriate to them on their boards.

  • they marked the spot , and then moved it along with the saffolding farther down the street, it landed near a corner of the street , they marked where it was , and before it could be moved the towers fell , and then they moved it farther down street to allow equipment into site, DEBUNKED ,

  • @matted0073 Beyond that, the ''mark'' seen as a yellow ribbon, is a piece of the ribbon that the cops used for seeling the area. It's looks like it's has been ripped off...maybe because a fire engine drove towards it in a hurry, i don't know. The ''mark'' isn''t planted, it's just a piece of the same ribbon.

  • The tire didn't pop because whaen the plane hit, the gear was up. What does the yellow on the scafold mean? And those "makings" on the sidewalk? The curb is red, and it was mostly covered in ash.

  • Silly. If we had the TSA before 911 this probably would have never happened. Stop the return to Private for PROFIT air port screening.

  • @01V92VIC Yes it would have.

    TSA is BS. They're job is to increase public tolerance for the unacceptable, to make people think that groping a person's genitals and breasts is not unreasonable search.

    Until we bring the real perps to justice and stand up for our inherited rights, our asses are cooked.

  • @CNN911Fakes I like the groping bit. Its the only reason I fly...

  • @KowBoySpace Some off topic comments are well worth getting! Thanks.

  • @01V92VIC Only a TSA employee would say something stupid like that.

  • So basicaly I'm asking what are the red marks supposed to prove? Also what is the ribbon supposed to be proving as its in both images?

  • I'm wondering how this video proves the gear was planted... It makes sense that the gear could have survived the impact and exited the building during the hit, simply due to its mass and momentum, landing gear is robust and heavy(compaired to other parts of an aircraft). Also the gear looks the same to me, it does however look like it was turned/rolled about a half turn(hence the tire damage in one image but not another, its on the side you can't see).

  • @12amormidnight Your mind is clearly made up.

    But, someday when you decide to study history and discover that the real purpose of government is to oppress the people, you will have the opportunity to rethink your absurd conclusion.

    Fact is this; if you ran a car at 120 MPH into one of those box columns, the box column would not even budge or bend (well maybe just a little) and the car would be history.

    It's at least 2 different tires. It did not come from any plane that flew on 9-11.

  • @CNN911Fakes

    Glad to see your response, and no my mind is not made up. I believe it is possible that 'evidence' was planted. I also belive it is possible that it didn't need to be because the goverment or whoever could have used actual planes. I think the gear looks the same just turned, that does not mean it wasn't planted. I also think landing gear is one of the more probable pieces to survive such an impact, which would make it a good piece to plant.

  • @12amormidnight Thanks. Triage on comments is an art!

    I have videos proving that every official piece of airplane evdence in NYC and Washington is faked/planted.

    I side with John Ashcroft and the pros interviewed on 911 before discovering the "hijacker" personas were idiots; flying such a plane in such a precise way is essentially impossible.

    All wtc2/ua175 videos have been proven faked. But, even without that proof, 1/8th inch aluminum does not slice thru 2 feet of structural steel.

  • @CNN911Fakes

    I agree 1/8th inch aluminum is not going to slice thru 2 feet of structural steel. It will however continue to move thru a buildings window opening after the glass has been destroyed, but thats not the point, I'm trying to wrap my head around how these items you have pointed out prove the gear was planted. I'm trying to get a slightly more detailed explinations of how you see the facts you pointed out in the video.

  • @12amormidnight Glass or no glass, a 16 ft aluminum can with 1/8th inch thick walls will only crash against 14 inch structural steel box columns. It cannot go through.

    But the NIST images all show it sliced through, making it totally absurd.

  • @CNN911Fakes

    But anyways here is what I would like an answer to, what is the significance of the red markings on the ground that use to make a connection to it being planted and the connection of the yellow ribbon. Your seeing some important difference that I'm not seeing, thats what I want to see, to get, to wrap my head around.

  • @12amormidnight They are persistent markers.

  • @CNN911Fakes

    So how do persistent markers showing the tire was moved get you to the conclusion that anything other than that happend? I'm trying to see the proof in all this. I do agree with you on the importance of chain of custody documents and preserving the purity of evidence, but that doesn't mean it wasn't just moved(some could argue it was caused by the buildings collapse, but as to how thats alot of speculation).

  • @12amormidnight sorry but it does seem like your mind is made up. you're the type of person that when asked by your government to 'jump' you respond 'how high' instead of 'why'. no offense.

  • @lordteapot

    I would ask how high, followed by why then add in a 'you first and maybe I'll think about it'. I'm just wondering how the points he shows are supposed to prove that the tire was planted, not just moved a half turn or so. There was alot of chaos when the towers fell, and some people are just dumb enuf to mess with stuff they shouldn't, also investigators sometimes move stuff at accident scenes to get additional pictures.

  • @12amormidnight Once tainted, it ceases to be evidence. If it were the same tire (it isn't and no one over several years has ever showed it is), it should never have entered the 911 evidence stream since it was moved.

    Instead, it is a star witness on the "plane" team. It can't be. We do not have a proper audit trail. The moment an "investigator" touches evidence as you described, it ceases to be evidence. Crimes are not photo ops for weapons, etc.

  • @CNN911Fakes Well honestly they are not going to leave 'evidence' at the seen indefinatly, it has to be moved at some point, and during accident investigations AFTER initial photos are taken showing the ORIGINAL location additional pictures may be taken to show the entire ORIGINAL condition of the item at the scene. This is sometimes done because when they transport items to thier warehouses there is the possibility of damage in transit(additional small scratches etc).

  • @12amormidnight Don't get me wrong though, tainted evidence is tainted evidence, things do go to far and I am sure there are things about 911 that were done by the goverment, maybe not as a whole but then again maybe as a whole. I've gotta look up more structural data on the towers to make up my own mind on the rest of that, course I would like to see what a 150 foot can going 150+ MPH hitting anything would do.

  • @12amormidnight yup, that's why they have chain of custody documents, to preserve the purity of the evidence.

    There is none for this, or the other, landing gear. There is not even a radio call showing it was found ans asking for instructions from the brass.

    The landing gear is evidence only of a cover up, it can't be used in any other way.

  • I was in prison durring 9-11, and even then I said it was not done by just planes. I dont know to believe the landing gear is false or not, however the detination blasts that took the buildings down clearly showed we were behind it. Not a single piece if building to find, yet a full tire just hangs out.....thats shady as hell to me. But so is our gov, so how does anyone believe that they couldnt have done it. Blame over seas than force our ways on them. Real american.........

  • Seriously? After all the fire the tire is not burned?

  • @dmitrysouvak

    I doubt it would be, think about it, the tire is ment to withstand the heat created while the aircraft lands and brakes, then it also did not stay in the building for the fire, it passed thru due to its momentum and the fact that it was probably going over a hundred miles an hour at the time of impact. With the large glass windows it would have easily had the potential to punch right thru the building.

  • @12amormidnight If it flew through then yes, but who knows if it did or not

  • @outofslumber, ........ your probably right, the situtations were the same, because the simularities are so closely related, Manhatten Project, NOT ! Manhatten Project, We had been attacked Dec &th, the leading Physicist Albert Einstien sent Bsh a letter that the Germans scientists were working on nuclear fuission bom, so we neede to to do the same., Times were severly different. Plus they did not remaim silient that they worked on the bomb, nor did they deny that we made it and used it.

  • no the fires raged hot enough to buckle steel and also you have missing floors in the towers so there is dead weight which caused the towers to fail just shut up about conspiracy theorists

  • Wow... conspiracy idiots are definitely.... idiots. Get a life dude.

  • Please feel free to bring fourth credible humans that were involved, there would litterallly be hundreds of demolition people, the truck drivers bring the false evidence just bring to or three to tell there part in this, ................ yoou can't, you people are just sooooooooo stupid it's pathetic.

  • @ourpath24

    Over 100,000 people were involved in the Manhattan project. You could probably count on your fingers how many knew they were involved in making an atomic bomb. Compartmentalizing and the story for what they were doing was different at every level. It's well in the realm of possibility. You under estimate how cunning people can be.

  • STUPIDITY.. SHOULD BE ILEGAL...:p

  • IT PROVES THAT MORONS AND RETARD PEOPLE KNOWS HOW TO MAKE CONSPIRACY VIDEOS,.. THE ARROWS ARE FOR PLACEMENT AND LEVELING IN CONSTRUCTION... DOOOHHHH...

  • Its highly unlikely that someone would destroy one of his economic centers to get a reason to start a costly war.This is a secret service Psyop against the US to divide the people from the government to paralyse the US.

    My brother Markus Bott had been tortured during five and a half years by the german BND.He was assassinated on 11.7.09 because of our homepage. Examples of torture and steering in Germany are found on my channel in the videos on Anneliese Michel and the RAF members.

    Martin Bott

  • The comparison of the yellow ribbon is on different struts of the scaffolding, you complete mong. The first photo of a yellow ribbon was of the ribbon on the second strut from the end (covered by yellow caution tape in the "after photo"), the second photo was of the ribbon on the end strut, one along from the previous yellow ribbon.

    I'm amazed you utter retards haven't come up with a conspiracy about the curious cardboard box and traffic bollard that mysteriously appears in the second photo!

  • photo comparison:

    Tyre: Pretty much still in the same place

    Lamp post: Pretty much still in the same place

    Ribbon: Pretty much still in the same place but bedraggled a little and covered in dust, almost as if a FUCKING BUILDING COLLAPSED NEARBY.

    More "Pwoof" from "Twoofers"

    Next they'll be saying that the buildings didn't collapse at all and that they were only ever a 1970s hologram put there to deceive people in the first place.

  • The "Special" markings on the sidewalk are fluorescent orange indicating that there is fiber cable buried there. These markings are painted by cable locators so that when streets and sidewalks are repaired, the cables do not get cut. Go ahead and ask me how I know, idiots.

    9/11 truthers are all morons.

  • So are you saying that something on the ground got moved after the towers collapsed? Oh, wait a second, I figured it out.

    This smacks of desperate attention seeking on the part of the sad prick that posted it.

  • You people who are trying to prove there were no planes that hit the towers, when hundreds of New Yorkers witnessed this event are doing the truth movement a great injustice! Don't you think that if there were no planes, more people would be speaking out? If you want a missing plane, the place to look 4 that is the Pentagon; something hit that, but I don't think it was a 767. And there's no doubt those WTC buildings were brought down w/the use of incidiaries & explosives. Isn't that bad enough?

  • @AVEIL I wonder why you decided to rant about "no planes" on a video that proves that a landing gear found in New York City at the intersection of rector and west was planted to make it look like a plane crashed nearby?

  • @CNN911Fakes We can prove 911 was an inside job without making speculative claims (I include CD in that too). It makes no difference if there were planes or not. It works against exposing the truth to claim there wasn't because NO ONE will ever believe that there wasn't.

  • @waitew This video proves the landing gear was faked. I have personally proved that every other piece of aircraft evidence was also faked. I have proved the videos of the wtc2 event were faked.

    If you ever find any conclusive evidence there were planes anywhere at all on 911, you need to be able to explain why they faked all that.

    I am open to the possibility, but, having researched 911 now for many years, I am pretty aware of all evidence; there is none for planes. Believe what you wish!

  • yay a tire! ....i found a bullet shell by the grassy knoll! does that mean jfk assassination was staged too?

  • Let me sum this video for every one who doesn't want to waste their time

    1. Disney Letters

    2.Tire Rolled

  • @denverJPUE Cool, who rolled it?

  • @CNN911Fakes same people who put it there, illegals

  • @CNN911Fakes it rolled on its own, after being thrown hundreds of feet, it is not going to just stay in one place

  • @CNN911Fakes Oh, I dunno, a whole lotta shit that hit it when the building(s) collapsed, maybe??

  • @kmacksb Nope. According to the official lie, the buildings came straight down like a stack of dishes and the offiicial FEMA graphic showing the debris field shows no serious debirs went to rector and west.

    Have another guess.

  • @CNN911Fakes It wouldn't take "serious" debris to account for the movement. Regardless, *why* would they move it? Of course, I find it hard to take seriously someone who evidently doesn't know what Underground Service Alert markings are...

  • My face when there is no concrete evidence for an inside job

    My face when people actually believe this shit

    My face when this guy is probably retarded

    My face when americans are stupid

    my face when i have no face

  • 12/31/11 2400 1,109,193

  • Who ever did this Video should be ashamed and very sorry for the lies being told! When September 11 occurred, many of us have lost loved ones and dear friends! 9/11 really happened and many people died! So stop telling lies and start being an AMERICAN!!!

    Never forget 9/11!

    May God bless the Victims, their Families and America!

  • @steericusa You quote the liar in chief on the day he helped his bosses and the rest of our elected leaders attack America and you have the hutspa to suggest I should be ashamed?

  • This landing gear indeed was not planted. Besides, why plant plane parts when it is undisputable fact that planes crashed into the wtc on 911?

  • I don't understand why you circle the yellow tape tied around the post, if anything it goes against your argument. What ever moved the tire for what ever reason is probably the same thing that moved the garbage and large foot high objects that look like concrete taffic obstacles to the gutter alongside the sidewalk. Perhaps to make room for what looks like army vehicles in the background.

  • Stop the image at 0:32. You can clearly see damage on the underside of the tire as it lays near the post. Stop image at 1:09. You can clearly see a large cut. It is indeed the same tire, all that has happened is the tire has been rotated moving the cut to the top when the tire was moved a few feet to the left. 2:22 clearly shows this as well as the stretched police tape and the red barrel that was pushed in from the tire being moved into it at 2:43.

  • So are we to believe the little yellow ribbon around the scaffolding that you have circled would be in the exact same position with the end hanging down at the same angle, that it shows, would still be that way from January to September? For what reason would anyone place the tire there in January, take a picture, remove it, and then replace it there again on 911? Why would they also take the trouble to plant and replant the broken street post on the ground and in the same position?

  • Is this what you do with your day? I think you need a job or at least a hobby. Seriously. This is passed disgusting. and also p.s. Just because this wasn't allowed in the criminal case, doesn't mean it was planted. It could mean many things. You are just to stupid to realize that. Read up on things before you make yourself look stupid.

  • -THE TIRE IN PICTURE ONE LOOKS NOT REALLY DIRTY OR ANYTHING THAT I WOULD THINK ITS OF ONE OF THESE TWO PLANES

    -IF PLANES ARE FLIGHTING I REMEMBER THE TIRES ARE INSIDE SO THEY HAVE A LONG WAY TO MOVE TO THE GROUND...

  • I do understand that we need a chain of custody, and it's the same tire in the after picture just look at the pictures! It's been rolled over, either by vehicular movements or debris! Why would they plant it? Are you saying that no planes hit the WTC? What is your claim about 9/11?

  • The only proof in this video is that the landing gear was moved during or shortly after the collapse! Proof that it was planted would be a picture off a couple of guys carrying it around downtown manhattan just before the plane hit. Does anyone really believe no one would see a couple off people presumably with some kind of truck randomly dumping airplane parts minutes/seconds before the crash?

  • @RAFARO1986 Sorry. Our law requires a chain of custody. Since the before images show police tape, police had taken control of the crime scene evidence. New police tape in the after tire (which only your imagination can make the same as the before tire) shows they still had control of the crime scene evidence. The NYPD has not told us they found it nor that it was moved. In a criminal case, it could not even be introduced as evidence it is so tainted.

    The before images are way before 9/11.

  • @CNN911Fakes prove that the images are before 9/11. NYPD leaves traces of police tape everywhere. Your pictures prove nothing. The markings on the side walk are from the construction crew or ConEd doing work on pipes underground and those are the markings of where said pipes are.

  • Obama and Biden's master plan of moving a landing gear a couple feet with 2 huge towers collapsing(which doesn't shake the ground and throws nothing at all around), and before they were even elected. They are geniuses.

    As that other guy said, keep raising your virtual "The End is Near" board around your neck. hahah

  • Nice to see some ignorant Japanese hanging around, especially with good English

    You got some pictures of moved landing gears from the vibration caused by the Tohoku earthquake? What do you figure the Richter magnitude would be for a bunch of floors coming down on their own?

    birther obama and biden (the best reason for not impeaching obama) were both federal elected officials on 9/11/1-yup, they were in on it. Even Senator Wellstone who waffled and was assassinated subsequently was in on it

  • @CNN911Fakes Thanks for calling me ignorant since you know me so well to know that and doesn't seem to have a biased image of people at all.

    I don't think there were any planes been smashed on building during the earthquake while their landing gears were thrown away on impact...

    Anyway I'm not a geologist so I wouldn't know the magnitude but I can thing that thousands of tons of metal, cement and whatever else can pretty much shake the ground, and not just a little, and two times.

  • @KohakuSan89 A guy who introduces himself to a serious issue where a people are under attack by their own government with sarcasm and facetiousness describes himself as ignorant. You are, on YT, what you wish to be. You could just as easily approached the subject with respect and understanding. You didn't; that's ignorant.

    Now you prove even greater ignorance suggesting that, in order for ground shaking to move a heavy object, that object had to come from an airplane on 911.

    Ignoramus!

  • @CNN911Fakes Well if you show me any plane landing gear which moved or not on the earthquake maybe I will look it up somewhere.

    I don't say I completely disagree with you though, I agree your government knew about it and did nothing, I just don't think it was their plan, they just gave it a blind eye(dunno if that's correct spelled).

  • @CNN911Fakes Right here is some good English. "Give up and stop living in some make belielve world." So if this is true what are you going to do about it, all you do is reply smart arsed comments made by people that think this is a joke,all you are doing is making a fool of yourself.

  • you are a big tit

    what a load of bullshit

  • No I have my explanation of it and that is that after the towers collapsed you can see that the crime scene tape is torn off and that everything is covered in dust. You can also see that it is the same landing gear it's just been pushed over to the right, it you compare the before and after picture you can clearly see that the tyre has been pushed more towards the right, and you can now see the cut that was at the bottom of the tire in the earlier picture! It's just been moved, most probably b

  • Excuse me if I'm stupid but why the f would they replace a fake landing gear? I don't get your point? If they planted the first one why would they replace it? You make zero sense...

  • @RAFARO1986 So, rather than try to explain the anomaly, you would just dismiss it?

  • not good

    

  • you are fuckin retarded.

  • @freakboy324 If I am so low you can still see me, you are right; I am still well within the range of retardees!

    Thanks for the reminder that it would only take a little laziness to fall to a vocabulary as devoid of meaningingful words as yours.

  • ...there are lots of sidewalk markings everywhere due to ppes being laid down or whatever especially in nyc. also you have never seen shit like ribbons tied to a pole...peole do that stuff all the time. and who the hell is the guy running around on the ground with a gian peice of landing gear.....could you dumb landing gear that proficiently while being rushed by a burning building

  • Undoubtedly these are two different pieces of landing gear, but pictured in the same location. By WHOM and WHY?