Added: 2 years ago
From: TCCTV
Views: 1,357
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (66)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Republicans: lower taxes mostly for the rich, increase spending.

    Democrats: have to raise taxes to fix what Republicans did.

  • 1 Tim. 6:17 - "Give orders to those who are rich in the present system of things not to be high-minded...18 to work at good, to be rich in fine works, to be liberal, ready to share"

    You can use the Bible to prove republicans are NOT Christians! If they were, they would follow the guidelines set out in scripture.

    Is God starting class warfare????????

  • Tax the rich as FDR, Nixon, LBJ, JFK, Truman, etc. The US economy grew much faster when we taxed the rich at 74 - 90% top maginal rates. Economies go into boom, bubble, bust cycles everytime you kkkons endulge your Donald Trump mancrush's and give the capitalist elites a tax cut. Time for rates to rise kkkons. The future is progressive and left - get used to it or get out of the way.

  • how about this tax is extorted theft used as a control mechanism for the debt slaves. Submit or go to prison. Please note all of humanity is infected with this plague of theft. Now if you support a government that uses theft to fund itself and its people programs who do you think you will atract to run the government, yep THEIVES they are most qualified to steal.  Now what kind of a population will you create. A bunch of immoral submitters who will cave into any immoral act. prison planet.

  • How does everyone feel about the notices received in the mail telling Social Security recepients "there will be no regular cost of liviing increase this year as of their records there was no increase in the cost of living this last year" ?

  • you know if they gave every man and woman who is running there house hold would be give 1 million dollars there would not be an issue with anything not the economy, not health care not losing your house or your car nothing. and the economy would turn around faster than you can so noooooooooo taxssssssssss.

    or no bad health care billlllllllllllll.

  • There is an inverse relationship between taxes levied and wages kept--espceially since the Great Depression. Please, please check it out for yourself.

  • Tax revenues are way down, but if you think letting the Bush tax cuts expire will help--think again. We need to go back & undo Regan's cuts that took the top marginal rate from above 70% down to the 30% range.

    "No new taxes" is a mantra that is meaningful to the very rich but is largely irrelevant to average working people.

    Roll back the Reagan tax cuts!

  • So giving people more of their own money is bad for the economy?? Really??

  • Reagan cut middle-class wages for his famous "tax cut for the middle class." So why did middle class wages GO DOWN over the next two years? Because their employers knew that they were taking home more, and they were willing to work for less.

    You make a common error in not seeing the concept of money as a relationship. If money is witheld from the economy, it does not exist.

    So, with working people, when taxes go up, wages go up. When taxes go down, wages go down.

  • You Americans are such suckers.You think that the rules for taxes that apply to rich people also apply to working people. But they don't. When working peoples' taxes go up, their pay goes up. When their taxes go down, their pay goes down. It may take a year or two or three to all even out, but it always works this way - look at any country in Europe. And it's the opposite of how it works for rich people!

    You guys are poor, uneducated and easy to command.

  • Hmmm, would you then volunteer for a 100% tax rate: by your logic, you would increase your pay!

  • The same rules for tax rate increase are different for average working people than they are for the rich. That's the logic I am talking about. The "logic" you want to bring up has absolutely nothing to do with the points I raise and you know it.

  • Are you high or just incredibly stupid?

    "Giving away 40% of your money to the govt as opposed to 0% makes you have more money" good luck with that

  • When the average worker's taxes go up, wages eventually follow. When taxes go down, wages will go down. Inflation-adjusted take home pay remains the same. For the last 60-70 years this has happened over & over & over again. Check out the numbers for yourself.

  • yes this happens when we have a bank that we borrow from and every dollars borrowed has a fin. charge. (this is why we are in so much debt yes national debt.)

    this is a no win plan. the bank contol this country no one else. why do you think they were bailed out and not the housing market. and then we were taxed to make up for it. we are made to pay for the bad judgements of our gov.

  • 21stcenturypainting--

    You make a good argument for everyone getting more involved and knowledgable in and about our democracy--such as it is today. The wisdom of the founders--if taken seriously--will trump the casinos in Wall Street and the usury crimes of the banking system. We the people ARE the government and trying to "destroy" or severely limit our government is, IMO, a schizophrenic approach to citizen activism.

  • I'm sorry your ignorance is too deep for me to invest in arguing with you because there's no return. If you give some of your money away you have less of it its as simple as that.

  • Reagan cut top marginal rates on millionaires and billionaires from 74% down to 38% and there was an immediate surge in the markets, then the worst crash since the Depression and the failure of virtually the entire nation's savings and loan banking system. Bush I cut taxes, and the nation fell into a severe recession while debt soared and wages for working people fell.

  • When the rich are heavily taxed, economies prosper and wages for working people steadily rise. When taxes are cut for the rich, working people suffer and economies turn into casinos.

  • There are other taxes besides the income tax. There are also plenty of taxes foisted on employers which forces them to fire workers. There's also inflation to consider.

    Even if pay and taxes did equal out (which they don't) if less people are employed everyone does worse.

    I would probably qualify as lower middle class but I think if we pay taxes at all we should all pay an equal share. If the government cannot fund its bullshit programs and agendas with what they steal we shouldn't do them.

  • Come on now- Raise Taxes for my Boss and my Pay will stay the same and he will charge consumers more to make up the tax...Gimme a break- ALl Obama is going to do is make all hard working ppl give up and quit their jobs so the Gov't can pay for our shit too!!!! It's only fair!!!

  • Sarcasm, mind-reading & guessing at motives based on short-term attitudes or generalizing from a focus on the micro-details of economic/social situations will increasingly be shown to be ineffective and bankrupt. Seeing the big picture is essential & admitting that economics is undergirded by--first and foremost--human psychological behavior is a more useful perspective.

  • Please enlighten me....How did the Obama Stimulus that had to be rushed into law with out anyone reading it due to the economic crisis pan out? Would that not be our Gov't trying to Guess and Mind read based on the short term attitudes? How much of my paycheak should go to the Gov't ? If you could simplify your answer to valid points and providing the source of your proof -I would be very grateful.

  • You cannot "request" or even "demand" anything CLOSE to "enlightenment." It is something personal, akin to the Christian concept of grace.

    Where did you find the info that no one read the stimulus bill? NO ONE? I think you are either misinformed or deliberately lying. I am sure there were more than a few Republicans and libs who read the legislation.

    Most of the idea behind the stiumulus money can be picked up from any Econ 101 textbook. Google "economy" "depression" "inflation," etc.

  • You have got to be kidding me- You REFUSE to state any facts...what a surprise.....You can not name 1 Congressman who read that entire Bill in the 48 hours ( give or take a day) given to them before the Vote - if so- who? You can not prove any of what you are saying... so what book will I find that says to have the Gov't spend $2,192,000 on studying grape genetics..Check it out- It's in the Bill. This was nothing more than the Dems getting their wish list taken care of...

  • FACT--enlightenment cannot be forced

    FACT--Grace is a Christian concept. If you talk about "requirements" to be enlightened (or saved), then you are NOT talking about Grace.

    FACT--Stimulus allocations are part of Keynesian Economics.

    FACT--You assume that NO ONE read the simulus legislation (not even Elizabeth WARREN?).

    Suprise! 4 FACTS

    You speak falsely when you say the bill was "nothing more than the Dems getting their wish list." Beware of generalizations like "always" or "nothing"

  • And Elizabeth Warren is a Congresswoman for which State????

    Your comments are pointless as you have no idea what you are talking about- No one wants to know the facts you state as they do not pertain to the Health Plan nor the Stimulus package- Have a great day!

  • Clean up your communication. Do not state "You REFUSE to state any facts" when you have provided nothing but guesses. Your intentions were good, I am sure, but you need to be aware of the EFFECTS of your "good intentions." BTW, do YOU have any idea what you're talking about when you asserted that NO one in congress has read the legislation?

    The meaning of your message is THE RESPONSE YOU GET. Change what YOU are doing--don't blame the other for not getting it. Take some responsiblity.

  • Let me reiterate- You REFUSE to state any facts. I AM asserting that NO Congressman or woman has read this Bill in it's entirety! This is a FACT!!!! Not 1 person in congress could say in the newes outlets that they read it fully...it is impossible as they state to read it with in the timeframe given to them by the Dems and the President! YOU- Have no idea what YOU are talking about- Do you even live in the US? You want me to CHANGE telling the TRUTH- NOT in a million years!!That is who I am!

  • Your statement "You REFUSE to state any facts" is wrong. And unless you have questioned EVERY legislator in Congress about what they did or did not do--or can show me a news report that backs up this amazing claim, I withold judgement unless you can provide facts.

    If I can read "Huckleberry Finn" in close to two weeks with time for eating, sleeping & doing other things, I assume that it is possible to read a large amount of material in an adequate time frame,

  • You have proven my point yet again- You have not answered not 1 of my questions. You have the ordacity to now equate a 1000 + Bill in a language that is purposely written so that the common citizen can not understand it with out translation to "Huckleberry Finn"... I am done- Have a great day and please keep posting your comments as you are now a GREAT example of what this administration is doing when trying to convince that this is a good thing for the American citizen! Thanks for the laugh!

  • You have proven my point again-You have not provided ANY names to my inquiries, You have the audacity ("ordacity"???) to imply I was commenting on the language of the bill rather than its length with the "Huckleberry Finn" example. Keep laughing. Not all conservatives are stupid but most stupid people are conservative. Are you a conservative or just stupid?

    YOU are done.

  • You must not be American...48 hours is an adequate time frame to read 1000+ pages of legislation- per your opinion- HA-I do not have to interview Congressmen to know for a fact that NO ONE READ IT!! If they had read the Bill they would have been ALL over the news bragging about it..Elizabeth Warren?- You think she is a Congress women? For what state?( and you resort to calling ME Stupid!).

  • So because someone cannot read 1000 or so pages in 48 hours that means that they are not AMERICAN ???

    And because you do not ask questions of people means you know their answers ANYWAY ???

    No legislator was "ALL over the news"--whatever THAT may mean--so you conclude that NO ONE read the bill ???

    BTW, I have NO IDEA that Warren read the bill or not. That was an assumption that I concluded with a QUESTION mark. I did NOT present it as self-evident truth.

    As you seem to be doing.

  • Who is ELIZABETH WARREN??? P.S.- I know who she is- do you?????

  • I think she is an economic professor. In any event, I know she is head of the COP.

    And...?

  • OUCH- Your words really hurt me...especially since they are backed up by so many facts...oooppppssss- I lied- There are no Facts...Have a nice day/night in whatever socialized country you live in.

  • What prevents you from answering my questions? Changing the subject is an interesting way to duck accountability.

    Remember Elizabeth Warren? How about your assertion about those who cannot read 1000 pages in two days?

    Hey, and where's your specific proof (not generalized guessing but actual documented proof) about your idea that you positively know what each and every Congressperson knows and what each and every congressperson did.

    Looking forward to some honesty.

  • YOU Have not answered anything. And now you cont. to come after me with not 1 FACT. If you google - how many congressmen read the stimulus bill? You will get your answer- ZERO! What other questions that you have? Do you need web addresses that prove the TRUTH? So- now answer my question- What country do you live in and who is Elizabeth Warren?

  • It is an interesting idea that one can make an assertion that NO congressperson or their staff read the stimulus bill. When did you find the time to research your little false pearl of wisdom?

    Speaking of Google, Elizabeth Warren heads up the COP. And she deals with congressional members who HAVE read the bill.

  • Until you answer even 1 question that I have asked ( which of course you can not ) I am done repeating myself...You have proven my point that you know nothing about this subject..

  • Typical Karl Rove logic. What prevented you from Googling Voinovich, Warren, etc.?

    I think it is because you have allowed your own curiosity & individuality to be taken from you. It was Americans like YOU who believed Bush's lies to go to war. It was people like YOU who were sure his tax cuts would "trickle down" to the rest of us. It was people like YOU who voted TWICE for the spoiled frat boy even as he ran up our budget's surplus up to a $600 billion deficit & forced finally him to TARP!

  • How come you guys can never do your OWN research? Why do you people think that a Glenn Beck website or a Rush Limbaugh audio snippet from Right Wing talk radio proves anything? Never take ANYONE'S word for ANYTHING !!! Check things out for yourself.

    Obviously you never checked out what I posted here. Like the GOP, you are perfectly content to be the "Party of NO" but seem to have trouble coming up with any plans or facts of your own !!!

  • aikido- Please do not be offended by this question. Are you on medication??? How much is our deficit?? Do you know?? Do you know anything at all??? I do all of my own research Thank you. This is how I was able to provide you with facts instead of just regurgitating non sense like you. I think that you need to quietly read the Bill that you seem to know nothing about and then return to reality and comment.

  • Yes.

    Nearly $12 trillion, I think. 

    No, not exactly.

    See above.

    Don't just do YOUR OWN research. Check other sources' evidence as well.

    You had the chance to check out Warren, Voinovich, etc. early on. What prevented you from doing so? You had the chance to SPECIFICALLY SHOW that I "regurgitated nonsense." But you didn't.

    You need to be DEFINITIVE when you make accusations like that.

    1) Prove what I say makes no sense.

    2) Show specifically where I got it from ("regurgitate")

  • Ok- 12 Trillion deficit from who? Bush?

    What FACTS have you actually stated? ZERO!! If you think that you have provided any FACTS- TELL US WHAT THEY ARE instead of regurgitating non sense!!!

    FYI-My research is done from ging to various sources ( a few examples include-. H.R. 3200, CBO, WHO,NCPA ) -

  • An accusation of "regurgitating nonsense" is backed up by proving the opinion of "nonsense" and by defining from who, specifically, was this "nonsense" "regurgitating" FROM.

    Bringing in questions as to what medicine I take or do not take is deliberately muddying the waters of honest dialogue. "Do you know anything at all?"--which you proffered--is not an honest question. Questions such as that presuppose you are not actually looking for an answer (because the question is silly on its face).

  • aikido7- You just proved my point!! You just want to argue about nothing. You do not know anything about the American Healthcare system or what Reform means.

    No Facts=No Debate

  • Like the tea-baggers, the town hall screamers and the GOP, you don't WANT to discuss American issues. You want to PREVENT such discussions from even happening.

    I work in healthcare. So does my wife. I had to take $20,000 out of my retirement to pay for life saving surgery. Don't tell ME I don't know anything about healthcare.

    BTW, why did you change the subject from the stimulus bill to healthcare reform?

  • I'm sure you did- *wink* * wink* And what is it that you and your wife do in the healthcare industry???

  • I worked in a hosptial as an oncology tech on a wing for end-stage cancer patients. I lost my job & had to retire early because of my knee and hernias--which Blue Shield did not pay for. My wife worked for home health & hospice full time. Now she works on call.

    You have no way of checking out what I have said unless you note that I have been completely honest so far.

    When you can point out ONE dishonest fact I have posted, we will start taking you seriously. And why DID you change topic

  • You Must be Bi Polar. Life saving surgery?? What was it?? For what reason ( if there actually is a chance that you are being honest ) would Blue Cross deny you? As far as me changing topics- I apologize as I am being chased by too many Libs at the moment I had not realized that I changed the Topic. If you have an actual fact to state- I would love to hear it.

  • "...must be Bi Polar" is a mean-spirited assumption. My assumption is that you changed the subject because you did not pay attention.

    Blue Shield (get your FACTS straight) did not cover the kind of hernia surgery I had, but because 3 doctors said not doing anything could be life-threatening or at the very least a "bad outcome" I had to use my retirement money. I now get SS disability which brings my monthly income to about $2000. My Blue Shield premium payment just went up from $500 to 600

  • My wife works per diem about 3-4 days a month (IF they call her)/

  • Dude- Not sure what to tell you. You must have bought some crappy insurance. P.S. ...It is called Blue Cross Blue Shield...Look it up.LOL - I know cuz I have the same insurance! BTW- I still believe that you are not an American Citizen.

  • Usted asume manera demasiado.

    Vous supposez trop beaucoup.

    Вы принимаете слишком много

    Sie nehmen zu viel an.

    你承担了太多的

  • I do not assume too much. Sucks to be you huh?? State Facts or in plain English SHUT UP!!!

  • Don't assume I haven't stated fact after fact in plain English.

  • Assume?? I don't assume! I know!!! You choose to not state any facts- Apparently you did not expect to argue with an educated American ....sorry to disappoint you!

  • "Educated Americans" do not make a judgement of "bipolar unless they are an accredited member of the medical field. Imagine--I always thought I had high blood pressure, gout and occaisonal UTIs.

    BTW, it is a FACT that Blue Cross, Blue Sheild & Blue Cross/Blue Shield are separate companies. Actually, NO. It is a FACT that my pharmacist has told me they are all separate--& that's what precise, factual communication is all about. Also FACT that the deficit was calculated at 12 trillion.

  • FACT--I am not bipolar. FACT--I am a US citizen (wanna see a birth certificate?). FACT--Voinovich said he read the Stimulus Bill. FACT--Eliz.Warren has read the bill & talked with those in Congress who have(from interview on public TV). FACT--She's head of COP. FACT--Spending is a capitalist method of SLOWING a recession

    ___

    FACT--you don't know who Warren is.

    FACT--you said no one has said they read the bill on any news outlets.

    FACT--you said I was bipolar.

    I listed facts. U didn't/

  • Why not tax the black market? Roughly 20% of our economy is underground and isn't taxed but there is a way we could tax it, and I think we should. I explain how in my blog. It should lower our taxes by about 9%.

  • Bush broke the pledge of not raising taxes...surprise? Not really: "Read my lipps: i will raise no more taxes" NWO LIAR.

  • Maybe he is a man for CHANGE now.

  • EMERGENCY ALERT - Stop the NEW Real ID - S.1261 - The PASS Act

    CALL THE SENATE @ 1-202-224-4041

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more