Yes, there are 2 images, but they are exactly the same. Someone took a 2D image and attempted to present it in 3D format. But It doesn't work unless you are using 2 different source images.
First, this was the teaser for Tron: Legacy (originally named TR2N), so it does have something to do with Tron: Legacy.
Second, this isn't an effective 3D even if you do the cross-eye stereoscopic 3D technique. You're missing the 2 videos shot at slightly different angles to make it effective as 3D. It's just the same image shown side-by-side. All this does is show you a flat image and hurt your eyes.
@TheXeno87 Exactly fucking n00b, you have to cross your eyes to fool them they're viewing a polygon picture. Search it up and then reply to me, please, don't be a fucking moron like you just did.
@TheXeno87 Holy shit you're the dumbest person I've seen on Youtube. SEARCH IT UP, CROSSEYED 3D. YOU CROSS YOUR EYES AND MERGE BOTH OF THE PICTURES AND FOCUS ON THE MERGED PICTURE. Search it. Even Google/Youtube support it on some videos. Is searching it up so hard or are you going to be a dumbass and embarrass yourself. You probably have searched it up but you're too weak gutted to admit it you're wrong. Wow, kids fail these days.
@4Dsign Actually it is possible, just not using the process this user did. For the upcoming Alice in wonderland, it was converted to 3D. Never shot in 3D. So it is possible.
I know, I said extract (not convert or simulate) to express that the real 3D info is lost when filming 2D so a conversion to 3D process will only produce a simulation. I mean, by a conversion shapes become too flat and distorted, a simple 3d sensation which isn't enough comparing to a real 3d recording.
@TronFan72 i didn't actually know that, but you can tell it's not quite right when you watch that film. It is more like 2.5D/3D blended together.
2.5D being flat images in a 3d space. Which doesn't require 3d vision, you can do this in a 2D video, and take a flat 2D images and then move the camera around and the individuals in the picture will stand out from the back ground.
Thats how i thought Alice in Wonderland worked to some extent. Although a conversion process would make sense.
This is not 3D.
Yes, there are 2 images, but they are exactly the same. Someone took a 2D image and attempted to present it in 3D format. But It doesn't work unless you are using 2 different source images.
MaximusNYC 4 months ago
Is this supposed to be human light bike
kevinroa305 4 months ago
First, this was the teaser for Tron: Legacy (originally named TR2N), so it does have something to do with Tron: Legacy.
Second, this isn't an effective 3D even if you do the cross-eye stereoscopic 3D technique. You're missing the 2 videos shot at slightly different angles to make it effective as 3D. It's just the same image shown side-by-side. All this does is show you a flat image and hurt your eyes.
Ovrkyl 7 months ago 5
This had nothing to do with Tron Legacy.
acdeditch99 7 months ago
my eyes hurt now!
jhurst111 8 months ago 10
Testando
BrisaTube1 9 months ago
This is NOT 3D
brickmaniac007 9 months ago 2
@brickmaniac007 Yes It Is.
blackdragonthebad 9 months ago
Its really easier on iphone....
swedenviggo 10 months ago
where is the 3d?
Not here.
TheXeno87 10 months ago
@TheXeno87 Fail comment, you have to cross your eyes n00b.
CLICKMEYOULOSER 9 months ago
@CLICKMEYOULOSER This is not 3d. Press stop and look the images. The Images are the same. noob
TheXeno87 9 months ago 2
@TheXeno87 Exactly fucking n00b, you have to cross your eyes to fool them they're viewing a polygon picture. Search it up and then reply to me, please, don't be a fucking moron like you just did.
CLICKMEYOULOSER 9 months ago
@CLICKMEYOULOSER use ur brain + cross ur eye and u see no 3d.
TheXeno87 9 months ago
@TheXeno87 Holy shit you're the dumbest person I've seen on Youtube. SEARCH IT UP, CROSSEYED 3D. YOU CROSS YOUR EYES AND MERGE BOTH OF THE PICTURES AND FOCUS ON THE MERGED PICTURE. Search it. Even Google/Youtube support it on some videos. Is searching it up so hard or are you going to be a dumbass and embarrass yourself. You probably have searched it up but you're too weak gutted to admit it you're wrong. Wow, kids fail these days.
CLICKMEYOULOSER 9 months ago
@TheXeno87 you much to learn have, young padawan
HollowIchigo3D 1 month ago
@TheXeno87 if u see the video in 720p you will can see the diference
brian82800 6 months ago
mehh
i was actually watching this with glasses
not as #D as others
ZmanzWow 11 months ago
Woaw , il't 3D
1Melsik1 11 months ago
Its like looking into a box
wks151 1 year ago
NOT 3d
softilol 1 year ago 2
UN PARAISO VIRTUAL DONDE EMANA LECHE ...... PODRIA SER ETC Y DEMAS PLACERES DIGICELESTTIALES....
SUMERSS100 1 year ago
Fantastic! I've seen this demo countless times, but never in 3d!
Datan0de 1 year ago
Its more flat than it is 3d
MrDaranel 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
PeteyPak 1 year ago
@PeteyPak yes it is sir..
HanakoNaraku 1 year ago
wow
KelanDWood 1 year ago
im gonna watch this on opening day..god im so siked thye made this movie
thetallwhiteguy222 1 year ago
Achievement unlocked: 50G-cross eyed
thresholder1 1 year ago
this movie looks sick
wapedf 1 year ago
@wapedf its already a movie its been out since the late 90s
eddiefiv 1 year ago
@eddiefiv Tron came out in 1982 and this is a trailer for a movie that comes out in December.
Bdizz2012 1 year ago
Extracting 3D from a 2D movie will never be possible!
4Dsign 2 years ago
@4Dsign Actually it is possible, just not using the process this user did. For the upcoming Alice in wonderland, it was converted to 3D. Never shot in 3D. So it is possible.
TronFan72 2 years ago
I know, I said extract (not convert or simulate) to express that the real 3D info is lost when filming 2D so a conversion to 3D process will only produce a simulation. I mean, by a conversion shapes become too flat and distorted, a simple 3d sensation which isn't enough comparing to a real 3d recording.
4Dsign 2 years ago
@TronFan72 i didn't actually know that, but you can tell it's not quite right when you watch that film. It is more like 2.5D/3D blended together.
2.5D being flat images in a 3d space. Which doesn't require 3d vision, you can do this in a 2D video, and take a flat 2D images and then move the camera around and the individuals in the picture will stand out from the back ground.
Thats how i thought Alice in Wonderland worked to some extent. Although a conversion process would make sense.
RenegadeMaster07 1 year ago
It needs to be closer together for cross-eyed
ddrmaxman 2 years ago
Awesome!!!
Uchihandres 2 years ago
Fail.
saintkamus14 2 years ago 2