@Isaiahpriest Imhotep was NOT an Israelite...his father name was not IsraEl/Jacob mother name was NOT Rachel! like real talk kill the Bullshit. where is the archeological evidence for this? even Biblical reference??.. let me guess your of Hebrew Israelite faith saying he was Joseph huh? check the dates they dont match! 2650-2600 BC.. Jacob and his family arrived in Egypt around 1880 BC..LIKE WTF? I guess he was worshiping Amen Re an not Yahweh..because Imhotep was also a high priest..
@BahamasIllestMC I never said Imhotep was the son of Jacob nor did I say he was Joseph. Your dates come from the crackers who still claim the earth is a million years old which is nonsense nor is there any proof.
Jews are so smart, they don't even need to lie to fool you. Just as long as you don't disagree with them. Or dare try agreeing to disagree with them. Churches today, as in Christ Jesus's day, are there to put spiritual walls between the father and his sons as well as the truth that the germanic race that spawned all white people, including most jews, are the israelites. Truth hurts for supremacists and cowards.
The Hyksos came from Arabia according to Velikovsky work in the subject. Even in the Bible it mentions, after expulsion of the Israelites, that they fought the Amalekites.
@itzoman Amalekites=Hyksos we do not know that for sure. in fact all of this is speculation and conjecture. cultures and civilizations come and go we can only make guesses as to what actually happened. many ppl say the hyksos were the Israelites now you say something different. this all teaches us that we must write our history and leave a clear and understandable legacy behind for the future. Peace!
@BeautifulDances If you look at Egyptian wall paintings something very much overlooked in these kinds of inevitable and racially-charged discussions: The people who inhabited Canaan and Libya and the Sinai and Syria are all depicted as having fair skin and not kinky hair. Even the Egyptians themselves depict a variety of skin colours living in Egypt, not just foreigners, but Egyptians. I'm not trying to argue for something retarded like the actors in the Ten Commandments.
@Bimfirestarter I happen to be black, Jamaican dad, Guyanese mum, and I've been a keen studier of Egyptology and ancient near eastern history since I was a little kid, and this much I've learned from what the Bible says and what the ancients said and what 'modern' people (especially black supremacist types) say: Ages ago, if you had fair skin but 'african' features, you were called white, but now you get called black. PRINCE with his fair complexion would've been called white in ancient times.
The periodic migrations of Canaanite people is a fact, that was governed by the relative predictability of the flooding of the Nile and its ability to provide water for the crops as opposed to the recurring famines in Canaan. It was not an EVENT. It was a recurring phenomenon. But again there is NO EVIDENCE of 600,000 men (not counting women and children) wandering through the desert for 40 years. Zero, Zilch,nada, nothing for around 1 million people?????????????
The reason that blbical scholars, that is people with an agenda, clearly not archeologists (as can be seen by the interview with John Bimson from the self proclaimed Christian college) are "breaking with that consensus" is their bias for historical accuracy of the bible. But Exodus itself is naming the cities built by the Israelites as "Pithon and Rameses" Exodus 1-11. Rameses is the name of the Pharaoh. The hyksos were expelled by Ahmose. That is intellectual dishonesty.
The Hyskos were not Isrealites, thE BIBLE WAS RIGHT, aBRAHAM WAS SCARED OF THE eGYPTIANS . THESE PEOPLE SHARED THE SAME RELIGION AND DID NOT PRACTICE ANY MONOTHEISM. THESE PEOPLE WERE JUST INVADERS. pERIOD THEY COULD HAVE BEEN ANYONE FOR ALL WE KNOW . BUT THEY WERE NOT iSREALITES PLUS THEY WERE EXPELLED. nOT JUST SLAVES.
lol.. so funny how the most HIGH exposes truth... WHY ARE THESE ISREALITES in the paintings BROWN or "BLACK PEOPLE"??????Lines up perfectlyan with the so called African Americans and the Book of Deut..inb the bible
@EarthAngel504 Yes I agree ..first called negros, then coloured, then black, then and now the so called african (by so called educated negroes). The Hebrews that dwelt in Hebron (Thence Hebrew) were the Hyksos of Egypt (Bondage)/Mizriam. The same blood line that is in the so called americas. Gods chosen. Look at history Isreals captivities have always been by the head of the world, thus making Isreal the tail. Here we are in our last captivity. To prove this go to anytown usa and go to
even if the hebrews were hyksos that does'nt mean they have any thing to do with modernday israel, because judaism is a religon not a race .by the way amo israel means people of israel not gods people
even if the hebrews were hyksos that does'nt mean they have any thing to do with modernday israel because judaism is a religon not a race .by the way amo israel means people of israel not gods people
if i already havent found enough evidence for Biblical stories ive found another one, Bible is truth, God is real and Jesus Christ is coming back soon.
ahahah thats right ISRAELITES always make shit pop!!!! You silly jacob for buying into all this ridiculous HAMITE trash...oh well Egypt is a dusk bowl and has not been recognized as a modern economic power since the days of Cesaer. Rome, Greece and Israel (kharzar's Israel) is still powerful and regulating shit in the world.
Did anybody ever wonder even the mummies clearly in this video could be from greco roman period? Eventhough egyptologist would want use to believe they are from the valley of the kings. But even the famous ramses mummy doesn't even look like him on the statue. Makes me wonder how the europeons been trying to use non native mummies to pose off as ancient egyptians. I can't trust anything they do. They even making fake statues of ancient egyptians.
You can clearly see that those modern day egyptians are foreigners or descendant of conquerers from the late dynasty-arab take over in 640 C.E. They look like syrian arabs and yemenites. Some look saudi and iraqis. They don't look like ancient egyptians.
I like this video. People need to realize that the bible is still satanic. Read the bible carefully people and peep what Satan is saying to you people what God said to Satan, and Satan is not the white man dammit. Satan is Satan, period.
He has this correct. Sorry to the traditional guys like Dwyer but there is obviously a disconnect of a few hundred years that becomes so.. well so obvious.. clearly the Hyksos/Exodus is something one to do with the other.
What is always strange to me... its actually guys like Dwyer that are obsessed with making Egyptian dates NOT coincide with Hebrew dates and I think he is the doing that so as to discredit the Bible.
We ought admit another thing - Egyptians are not the 'gold standard' dates.
NEVER take any thing white historian claim to be true , they are PASID to fabricate fairy tales to support their racist agenda, why do you thing al ancient sites are prohibited from the public . somone might sumble on the truth. they can"t have that.
The holy bible is just simply about color and black played a huge role in the bible people, like it or not. So please people, read the bible carefully.
Of course the wall paintings are of the Hebrews/Jews/Hyksos. They were in Avaris. That's where they really stayed not in the desert as the 'bible' claims. DNA sampling has been done on a number of mummies from Egypts important tombs and they find semitic blood. Google it. I'm not using the bible as a fact book, I rail against it and think based on findings that the Hebrews were actually Hyksos. Not slaves but barbaric invaders. Probably originated in Sumer long ago.
Jews are the Hyksos. They go to great lengths to hide that fact but Archeology and DNA tests do not lie. Moses was the last Hyksos king who took his people to Avaris. These are Semitic blooded people AND they spoke Aramaic predominately. If you believe these groups were different then why no writing by the 'Jews' describing their Hyksos masters? Because they were the Hyksos and Abraham was the first Hyksos king.The Jews deny this. Moses parted the sea? As much as Charleton Heston did.
Futhermore, why are walled paintings and statues of the hyksos depicted differently from the later depictions of hebrews?
Now that the hyksos might have been semitic and aramaic speaking that is possible, but that does not necessarily connect them to the hebrews.
The Bible is not historical fact but at some places it might depict events with a real historical basis. And if they once ruled the egyptians they would have surely mention it.
The word "hyksos" comes from heka khasewet, which means "foreign rulers" and was used by the Egyptians to describe the kings of nearby areas. During the Second Intermediate Period, the Hyksos invaded Egypt and formed the 15th Dynasty that ruled Lower Egypt for just over one hundred years.
I was also taught that they invented the chariot and that was one reason the fighting went on so long, and they were not defeated. I sure do wish educators would be more educated, and that educations itself was much different:(
Its all lies. The exodus never took place, it was Ahmoses I who drive the Hyksos out after the invade and enslaved us. It is written on Kemet walls, now they turn the story around! The Hyksos are Hebrews/Jews/Khazars who constantly changed their identity to cover up their crimes! See full evidence in the series called 'The Hyksos' by the user blackson1977.
None of the bible characters are real & proven to be Egyptian pharaohs whose history & identity they use as prototype.
I was taught the Hyksos were from northern Syria and invaded week Egypt was weak from the Nile drying. They brought the horse n charriot n advanced battle tactics. They were driven out after 100 years.
You've been serious MISEDUCATED. 1st, Hyksos broght NO chariots into Egypt. 2nd, the Hyksos were not only Syrians, they're Amorites(Syrians & Semite Canaanites who invaded these lands & got their God El from the native(black) Canaanites from Kemet) and they were also Hittite(Turks & Greeks) who are the real jews who are exploiting us out our minds.
The only thing they had over the ancient Egyptians was that they were great barbarians from Asia with great weapons as they live in a state of war.
I read the discourse of a lecture called something like "Ramses & the Hitites - Round II" As the premiss was that the Hyksos were ancient 2nd cousins of the Hitites. I had always been taught that the Hyksos brought the chariot and found no depictions of chariots previous to the time of that invasion.
I saw donkey drawn smaller versions but those had been around for ages from Egypt to ancient Ur.
Tut like many young adolescent love or dream of ahving a set of wheels. He had a good set buried with him.
Anyhow it was said that the Hyksos brought weapons the that were far more advanced than the dated Egyptians' like composite bows (tech fr/ China) & mounted archers (tactic from the stehp of Russia). The Egyptions in their isolation had weapons that were 1000 years out of date. Formaly subjucated Upper Egypt fought off & resisted the Hyksos for 100 years & were never conquered.
Pharaoh Tut's injuries were consistent with injuries sustained by plane crash victims & at the Seti Temple, Abydos we have seen tablets of planes, helicopters and submarines so how dare you tell the world he could only dream of wheels!
The Hyksos invaded in the 12th dynasty when buildings & civilisations already in placed! R u telling us that they build the pyramids & buildings which would involved invention of cranes, yet they knew nothing about wheels? Hummnn. Think!
RE-Read what I wrote: "Tut like many young adolescent love or dream of ahving a set of wheels. He had a good set buried with him."
So I have to believe you should be on some sort of medication or have same said adjusted. "Helicopters"?! "Submariens"?! Heck with those they could have taken over the world! LOL!
I could do with a bit of verbal exercise but I will not bother as it is clear you are the one who is on medication! Our Kemet ancestors have been building mega structure prior to the Hyksos & even before coming down the Nile from Buganda to Ethiopia and Sudan/Nubia! See the tablets on the background image on my channel proving we invented plane, helicopter & submarine! Unless you are claiming that Tut was descendant of Hyksos but we have his photo inside his tomb & he is black!
The Hyksos are Hebrews/Jews/Khazars with a criminal past. The attacked countries seeking work, enslave people and they destroyed the black civilisation. In modern history, majority of the slave ships were owned by them. Their identy had been exposed. It was originally exposed by Henry Ford, then by Arthur Kloser. They constantly reinvent their identity. We know who we are dealing with and there are lots of evidence out there!
If you watch the full evidence in the series called 'The Hyksos' by the user blackson1977 you will also see that 'Hebrew' was a term for 'coalition', a coalition of people who attacked Kemet/Egypt. It is not a name for a group of people. There is no history of a people called Hebrews, they are in fact proven to be Hyksos which were a term for 'Foreign Rulers' that came in from the sea.
Hello and thank you for your comments. We would disagree with you on some things though. There was a group known as the Hibiru(Hebrews) in ancient kemet and there are writings which speak of them. also it was the White philistines who came in from the sea, the hyksos are said to be asiatics from the desert. our opinion is that is is all speculation. check with youtuber daudmusa he is very good on this subject. we think the best on youtube. Peace!
@arab3515 As we said it is all speculation. they are thought to be desert dwelling asiatics, but that could mean anything. we do know that hyksos could refer to foreigners. so the hebrews could have been one of many different kinds of hyksos.
@nublackmusic Quote from The JEWISH POST:,È About the Exodus, We basically have one account-the Torah's. When it comes to the historical analysis of the Exodus, we have only one account, and asserting the historical validity of an event that took place 3500 years ago on the basis of a single account does not put you on very solid historical footing.
The Exodus is not about history; it is about faith. If we could "prove" it, we would not need to have faith in it..-- End of quote
@nublackmusic Quote from The JEWISH POST:,È About the Exodus, We basically have one account-the Torah's. When it comes to the historical analysis of the Exodus, we have only one account, and asserting the historical validity of an event that took place 3500 years ago on the basis of a single account does not put you on very solid historical footing.
The Exodus is not about history; it is about faith. If we could "prove" it, we would not need to have faith in it..-- End of quote
@nublackmusic The word Hyksos comes from Heka Khawaset it means foreign rulers. The word Asiatics denotes they come from the east. Now the debate is on dates. If they can give accurate dates. Well know who the Hyksos was.
@beholdtheageofold I have seen that it means sheperd kings. Being a sheperd was an abomination to the people of Mizriam. The Isrealites were Sheperds and were Kings in Mizriam/Egypt (Bondage) the first started with Joseph/Yoseph/kophu/cheops. So, the term Hyksos was a way to degrade the Isrealites.
@dyabraham, Ive noticed some scholars give them the meaning of Shepard Kings. However Flavius Josephus in his work " Against Apion", states that they were shepherd kings. However my point is that they were foreign rulers. They weren't original from Egypt. I think the Hyksos were the sons of Abraham before Jacob had a nation.
@beholdtheageofold just a hint to you... "Abraham" is another occult term and means "A'Brahm" or "Anti Brahman". Abraham was expelled from India (SARAswati area - where 1. Sanskrit Vedas were brought there by ancient Aryans ) and ran to Ur as ANTI ARYAN priest;his Anti Brahmanic doctrine of the CREATED ONES (opposite human - BORN ONES) - ADAPAS (Sumerian Adamas - Adamic "human" cross breeds - clones; Anunnaki = aliens, in india known as "demonic Naga&Asuras (as Osiris was))
@beholdtheageofold there was also no "Exodus" from Egypt. "jews" were Hyksos and nobody else... Osiris was their "god" and Moses was Osiris's priest (source: Manetho, Flavius)... Osiris's name in Egypt was Ausar, in Assyria known as Assur, Ashur, in India known as Asura or Bakasura (greek Bacchus - Dyonisis to romans) and became "new Yehowa" or Yhwh under Moses. Moses's name was Osarphys from Heliopolis (sun city). He was a "Messiah" to Hyksos. His name in fact comes from Egyptian MES or MESSU
@beholdtheageofold which means "giving a birth to... or also Titulus of Horus, son of ... " + Yah (Mes-Yah). And Yah or Yaw comes from old Slavic (Chaldean) "pagan" (Vedic) Yav (material); YHWH is also Astronomical Slavic "pagan" code of "gods" (Ba'al - Bull - Vol - Volos or Veles (Taurus) - constellation ) Hors or Horo (in Egypt known as Heru or Hor - Horus, represents a const. ) - before it became "forbbiden name of god"
@nublackmusic I have seen that it means sheperd kings. Being a sheperd was an abomination to the people of Mizriam. The Isrealites were Sheperds and were Kings in Mizriam/Egypt (Bondage) the first started with Joseph/Yoseph/kophu/cheops. So, the term Hyksos was a way to degrade the Isrealites.
@marshbey During the exodus Egyptians migrated with them. The books mentioned a tribe called Wodaabe??I do not think I spelled it right and Fulani so one out of the two or both have Egyptians mixed into their tribe. but you can see them in the African women and their tribe video.
@BeautifulDances It seems the Hebrews were quite tribal, and the Bible constantly makes mention of foreigners dwelling with them through the years after their Egyptian departure. Not just Egyptians left, but 'a vast mixed company' says the Bible.
@nublackmusic They were black kinky hair and the kind of black people you find in Sri Lanka with straight hair they were not white. The kente cloth is proof. You find that in west Africa and around India where the darkest black Indians live. They were no where close to white European
@BLAQAWEARNESS but on the egyptian paintings they look just as dark as the egyptians if not darker.IDK I COULD BE WRONG AS YOU CAN PROBABLY TELL, I DONT KNOW MUCH ABOUT HYKSOS. i actually heard last from sombody else that they were white. but it seems alittle off. i think that only time can tell because in ancient ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME. IT WAS RULED BY BLACK SKINNED PEOPLE. ACTUALLY ALOT OF EUROPE WAS RULED BY BLACKS. so it really depends on when the hyksos came to egypt
@arab3515 you are correct blacks populated the world prior to whites/cannanites 6,000 to8,000 yrs max also note that if the hyksos wasnt white there will be no need for the war at all they was trying to supplant the original dark black nubian egyption they the hyksos could be blamed for the later egyptions looking brown skin tan etc they took over the north then mixed with the dark original nubians
@BLAQAWEARNESS yeah you have a good point, for some reason white people tend to mix with darker people as a form of sexual genocide. but dont you think its strange that the hyksos and the hebrews both have a similar historical pattern??
@arab3515 (for some reason white people tend to mix with darker people as a form of sexual genocide) bro you are on money thats one of there objectives inerbreeding
the only people wins is whites because they have the least melanin outta all us so it helps them as far as mixing in just to mix out another form of vampireism
@arab3515 the hebrews are different they come from the line of abraham just like mine and your forefathers im making a nuwaubian vid that will explain that soon. but the hyksos come from cannan sons they came together to take out egypt they did untill thutmose took it back
@BLAQAWEARNESS yes i am aware that we are hebrews, but i wasnt sure about the hyksos thing, it is strange that we have similar history though....but anyway, let me get this strait, so did the hyksos enter egypt as white people and leave black (or with somewhat of a dark skin than what they had before??) or were they still white???
@arab3515 i feel you.the Spartans, Greeks,romans, (hyksos)came in pale but after the invasion they got sun tanned and alot of there children came out mulatto so after time of mixing on top of the tan from the sun they appared to be original but they wasnt
@arab3515 No white people were in egypt until the late dynastic period. The whole hyksos story is a eurocentric invention created by ashkenazi jewish people to place themself in ancient egyptian history. If there is no writing on the temples or hieroglyphics picture to prove it, it's not true. The whole story was created in the late 19th century. The only so call source they claim it came from is some greek roman guy name manetho, who they can't find his original text to support it.
@BLAQAWEARNESS The hyksos never exists. That's just a fictional people. There is no source on the temple wall of ancient egypt that suggest these people were ever in egypt, and if they did, they rule anything. Only one people could of fit that description of the so call hyksos and it's the assyrians. But no people ever before that rule egypt. No no african ever rule egypt, until the persians which came from iran conquer it. From Dynastic period 3400 B.C-525 B.C were rule by african faraohs.
@arab3515 I think the mainstream view is that they were not. But, there are similarities of the two people that cant be explained. I believe a lot of Bible believers (including myself) look at it that if its not in the Bible, its not true. The Bibles Exodus and the Hysos expulsion dosent look anything alike...if you believe everything that was written in the Bible was all that happened.
yeah now that i gave it alittle more thought, it whos to say that the hyksos came bit later than the hebrews, or what if they came a bit earlier than the hebrews, either way it could be possible and make sense of why they would have been expelled from egypt
@arab3515 The Hyksos weren't Hebrews, but Canaanites. Their remains show them as Baal-worshippers and worshippers of others besides Baal. If the dating of them is anywhere near accurate by archaeologists, then it would appear that Joseph came to power while the Hyksos were in control of Egypt, and once the Hyksos were expelled, 'a new pharaoh arose who didn't know Joseph', and the Egyptians turned and enslaved the Hebrews 'lest war come up and they join our enemies' as Exodus says. One theory-
@nublackmusic "Hibiru"... the term (in fact) comes from term "Nibiru", in Sumerian known as "cross over - blood ". English version is "Hybrid (Hibiru)... Original "hebrews" (breed- cross breed) were Afro Semites, their "jewish"(Hykso) "god" was Osiris and Moses was Osiris's priest (source: Manetho). Osiris was in egypt known "Ausar", in Assyria as Assur, in India as Asura (Bakasura - to greeks known as Bacchus) and became "Yehova" or Yaw under Moses...
New pictures of Hyksos statues have been found: The Egyptologist François Auguste Ferdinand Mariette (February 11, 1821 – January 19, 1881), had them stashed away in his scrapbook. You will find them very interesting.
We can't post web links, so cut and paste this address, then add the necessary parts like (COM)
@DamienDragonetti He didn't say 'Amun' but 'Amo Israel' as if it meant 'People of God'. The Egyptian records mention these 'amu' which some say could have included the Israelites, but it certainly wasn't exclusive to one people, but a kind of people, like the word nomads can refer to many tribes throughout the ages. This Simcha who narrates makes the error of twisting the facts to support a theory; 'Amo' in Hebrew means 'his people'; 'Israel' is the name God gave Jacob, means 'God contends'.
hyksos are mud ppl... aka ppl of mixd decent and origin, sorta like americans
they were nomadic, aka hustla's who got some fly weapons from asia n came to the norhtern most part of the kush empire duiring a time of turmoil, they stopped paying taxes and eventually reorganized the governmental structure... u know like when the pilgrims came here?... go aheah and hate now
People will do anything to disprove the Bible. The jews were in egypt under completly different circunstances than the hycsos. Their final destination after leaving egypt was different. Their priorities were different. Not the same people or event.
I do not wish to argue but understand why you follow/serve as you do. So if you would please answer the questions I have posed to you instead of dancing around them in pompousity. All you do is quote like all the rest never answering or even making a valid point just quoting as a follower does. Ingraine those words in your mind, waste your life in your closed view. But the least you could do to show your sanity is explain why you feel the way you do. If you so firmly believe them why avoid?
Then you just answered your own question, you just said that you understand why, so why keep asking me the same question, that I already answered to you? Wake up and grow up, Shalom!
Blessed are those who hear, and who keep the saying of this(Book/Bible) so if you think that I think that I am more superior then you, then I must be doing something right. I love Christ because He first loved me, and gave Himself for me, is that an answer enough for you? And the world was in need of a Savior. He's my Savior and I am not ashamed to tell you why. By the way, everything you know comes from a book of some sort, so why not the Good Book/Bible?
Revelation 1 15And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.
Look up burned brass & you'll see that it's a dark brown color. The Bible sure never says or suggests otherwise, but I'll be the first to admit that now all who run with the "Hebrew Israelite" mantra don't know what they're talking about & do regurgitate things said by others, but a lot of us are true, diligent, & studious of the truth & the attempts to hide it.
"as if they burned in a furnace" is present tense meaning that they were glowing....there is no such thing as fine burnt brass ...that would render it unfine. And brass is nowhere even near the color of ebony.
You can't even front like you've never seen this video either, LOL Look at you son! Fast forward 6 minutes in & you can't even deny the HARD evidence. The writing's on the wall chump! Those people on the wall are the same shade of brown I am, LOL!
You FAIL again Timmy, you're totally pathetic with not a single leg to stand on. I've killed you w/ hard evidence & the scriptures! AND you contradicted yourself! LIAR! LOL! The SNAKE is caught again!!!
@vghopkins LOL! Those are clearly Semitic peoples with a ruddy bronze color, vs the black paint used for Nubians...in the book of gates they are painted with yellow paint and are shown to be not Nubians. You BHs are self-hating blacks searching for an alternative indentity hyjacking in the process.
I've read the Bible, the Qu'ran, & the Tanakh. So I issue a challenge to you to give me examples of where the Bible contradicts itself, and I'll prove to you that it doesn't, on the stipulation that you post at least 3 verses to try to keep it in the original context of how it was written.
On the subject of the Mashiach's color, it is not only likened to fine brass, as if burned in a furnace, in Revelation, but also in Daniel.
We know Imhotep existed, but there is NO proof, outside of the bible, of a man named Joseph who lived in Kemet. There is also no proof of a man named Potipher. Also, Im not sure if I would want to waste my time giving you contradictions in the bible. From the way you come off, you don't seem very open minded and you also seem set in your ways. I could give you numerical contradictions that are plain to see and you will discard them as not being contradictions.
No, I was open minded enough to understand the whitewashing of history. I was a truther first & I was like you too, thinking the Bible was false & contradicted itself & I got away from it. Then I learned WHY certain things didn't stack up when I read in the Bible ITSELF, that "they" would try to edit it & also manipulate it behind a man-made traditional doctrine.
So I went to the Hebrew & the Greek on MY OWN, along with Islam, Kemet, Wiccan, & other pantheons. (cont'd)
@PitbullD Joseph isn't even a Hebrew name. He could have been called Imhotep by the Egyptians. This doesn't disprove the theory that Joseph and Imhotep is the same person.
@HouriBee man how the fuck could Imohotep be Joseph? really now? just more attempts to take Afrcian achievements away from Africans...even goin by the bible thats bullshit... Imhotep lived around 2655 BC during the 3rd dynasty and Joseph around 1700 B.C..if Jews was really enslaved by Egyptians then how is it none of their language was changed?.. the slaves of EVERY society adopt the language of their oppressors,
no exceptions!! same reason why black people in USA speak English now..430years?
@BahamasIllestMC this times were different my friend. JEws in many parts of the world, Persia, Rome, Greece, Europe and yet they still havn't lost their Hebrew language. PLease stop with that Black supremacy is ridiculous your not different from the KKK. Black people supremacist want to feel as the shit just because they think Egypt was the first civilization.
You talk about the mashiach having skin like brass but you are wrong. It says his face and hair were WHITE. And eyes like fire. So i guess jesus had fire for eyes too. IT DOESNT MAKE SENSE LITERALLY. That is because it is to be taken metaphorically. I can also give you contradiction but i would rather send them to you threw a message than on here.
Do you realize what you said? It doesn't make sense literally because it was a metaphor? Of course, & what is a metaphor?
So, it's says his HEAD & his HAIR were WHITE like WOOL. (White wooly hair, & his face was glowing), Eyes of flame (his eyes were glowing or bright like fire) & his feet was of fine brass as if burned in a furnace (his skin was that color).
Where's the contradiction? It's noted exactly the same in Daniel 10 as well.
I didn't say there was a contradiction in this section. Also i would like to point out that it DOES NOT say his hair was like wool. it says that it is WHITE like wool. The main point was on the color and not the texture.
9I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the HAIR OF HIS HEAD LIKE THE PURE WOOL: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
&
Isaiah 28
10For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little:
The OT majorly prophesies the NT which quotes the OT. No fallacy at all if you know the Word.
Most of the anti-Christian posts on this video fall into a common assumption, which is that the Bible should not be used as a reliable historical text. The books which comprise the Bible are as reliable as any other ancient primary sources. The so-called "spiritual" content found therein is also present in most bodies of ancient sources, so why don't you discredit them as well? When dealing in ancient sources, one will be hard pressed to find anything completely devoid of theological content.
Correct cause the bible is written by BABYLON(meaning confusion) so are many other religious books but scriptures are written by The People of the GOOD BOOK.
and puts an end to my identity crissis i was born in to. But one things for shure
HIstory speeks for it self.
And it tells a biblical story i'm saying hmmmm....
lol of course people would make this 5 stars! its the truth they existed in Israel thats because the invaded the land and then they took over Egypt after they were taught civilization, we gotta do our history, the truth will not be revealed because it would change history and uplift a certain people, theres really only 1 lost people on this planet with no known history who were put into slaves and get no reparations and the most hated today.
Looks to me like the Jews are still looking for a place in Ancient History by changing dates and events. The Truth needs no support. If they (jews) were in Kemet and all those plagues took place, the Kemmieu would have documented them. Too bad! No jews in Kemet!! I wonder what they will come up with next?
@ SqnnRa Not too long ago they found Egyptians chariots at the bottom of the northern part of the Red sea which sits in one of their museums. No one likes to record a good ass whipping especially if their hands are too short to fight wth YAHAWAH
Gen 46:32 And the men are shepherds, for their TRADE hath been to feed cattle; and they have brought their FLOCKS, and their HERDS, and all that they have. 46:33 And it shall come to pass, when Pharaoh shall call you, and shall say, What is your occupation? 46:34 That ye shall say, Thy servants TRADE hath been about CATTLE from our YOUTH even until NOW, both we, and also our fathers: that ye may dwell in the land of Goshen; for every shepherd is an abomination unto the Egyptians.
Wrong the Hebrew Israelites were only seventy souls and later became a great nation. There are a couple of names written of the hebrew israelites which were Black people Shepherd Kings and Hyksos. All them were Black people because Joseph brothers didn't recognize him because the Egyptians were dark skin people like Joseph.
So the Jews now want to claim some of Egypt. Imagine that I move out of a house that becomes yours and I stay out for 50 years. Then I decided it is mine and that you have to leave. The Jews are never going to stop.
The White Jews which are really the not ( Rev. 2:9, 3:9) Read in Isaiah 29:22 Jacob face shall not wax pale. The white man is a culture bandit and a murderer
Your book is limiting your mind. It is obvious from what you've just said. You are a fool for this, but you are not to blame for your ignorance, I pity your so very limited view of the world and existence. I hope that one day knowledge will prevail within your mind and you may begin to truely live life, with understanding.
Whatever you bring I can answer it through the Power of Israel who his name is Yahawah. Any question pertaining to who we R so let's begin !
Black people love to be a slave to all nations stop trying to be a slave to the Egyptians , the Arabs , the White race. Be a servant to Yahawah who can keep U safe and well.
The Prophet Jeremiah 2:14 Is Israel a servant? is he a homeborn slave? why is he spoiled?
Cuz Negroes want to be slaves to the Egyptians, Arabs and White People.
Thanks you obviously absorbed none of what I've said.
Why would you bow in service to something which you've not percieved for yourself. You must keep yourself safe and well, as is obviously possible for I've been able to do so, cursing all gods the entire time.
There is much more to existance then your narrow minded religion allows you to know. It keeps you within its confines limiting to the existance it tells. Why FOLLOW a religion that says one was a god(jesus) not all of us as we are.
Just the simple fact that the stories of the christian bible come from religions of thousands of years before, from various cultures. This alone should raise many questions, the biggest of which being. Why is this religion so special that it was true and all OLDER religions are false?(Not retourical I'm really asking you)
How can it be a Christian Bible ? Is that what you assume because the people of a religion use it as a prop ? Christianity is the religion of the white race forsed down the minds of their slaves. All religions are paganism from all the heathen nations. We are the biblical Israelites and only by seed can you be an Israelite oppose to religion anyone can join a religious cult.
Israelites in the bible are a people not a religion. The Biblie talks about laws which christians do not follow laws.
Christian are even close to the truth nor do they recognize Christ being a Savior only to Israel. What does Christian mean ? It means anointed followers o Christ Christ followed the law (Matt 5:17-19) Christians cast the law behind them.
Paul an Israelite whom the Christians love quoting his scripture but Paul also said we establish the law , Romans 2:13, Romans 3:31, Romans 7:1. Christians tot the bible but do not follow the bible.
That's nice, you have a single point of referance for all your "spiritual" information, which isn't spiritual at all. If you wish to FIND truths, instead of just being close you should search yourself. Personally I would say a combination of teachings from several Indian religions(Hinduism, Jainism, Brahamism..etc) to be "even closer" as you put it. You should look into them.
Why look into the heathens when i can look at my own people . What my own people aren't spirirtual enough?
If any people on the face of the earth there's one people who is spiritual is Black people in America. There a stigma that shows world or the other nations our spirituality is that saying "Gifted" and "Black".
I have never heard this saying applied to any other nation but us and certainly not even those fithy Africans.
You might want to talk to a Christian about the Greeco-Roman god called jesus who is not of the bible but of that religion called Christianity.
Psalms 96:5 For all the gods of the nations are idols: but the LORD made the heavens.
Isaiah 30:22 YE (We) shall DEFILE also the covering of thy graven images of silver, and the ornament of thy molten images of gold: thou (We) shalt CAST them away as a MENTRUSOUS cloth (as Bloody cotex); thou shalt say unto it, Get thee hence.
Do you draw all of your knowledge from one book. Where did you learn of a greco-roman god jesus, unless you mean Horus which means, son of Isis as does jesus
The answer is very simple Because what was said by Moses in his prophecy about Israelites came to be TRUE!!!!
Negroes did return into the house of Bondage a second time but with ships. Jeremiah prophesied Israelites would be discontined from their heritage and serve their enenimes in a land that is not their own . You ask a grown ass 10 Black or Hispanic man or woman What is their true heritage or identity you'll get 10 different answers.
Why would you want to follow a god who wanted to keep the supposed "first man and woman" from knowledge? A god who promotes ignorance and blindness to reality.
It seems this one book i draw all my knowledge from is suffient enough to crush all that garbage of books you study from since you cannot answer my two questions.
Here it goes from the scriptures of my one book concerning all your books :
Eccles. 12:12 And further, by these, my son, be ADMONISHED (To Warn): of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh.
I don't even know what your 2 questions were. Have you ever opened your chakras and meditated? The verse you quoted continues on to say to fear god and he will be judge of all your work good or evil(summerised) Why would you want to live in fear? There is no judgement, karma, not judgement. Why is there no secular evidence of any jesus christ existing? Especially if he was crucified during passover. Why does his life mirror the equinox Sun patterns?
Surely a god who would keep his peoples from knowledge would want the to read only one book for knowledge. You may quote, and quote, and quote, and think you understand, but it takes self realization of a higher self and consciousness to begin to truely understand.
I'm sorry you have to live your life in fear of condemnation It makes me wonder how much smaller christianity would be without its fear factor I used to look at life through a straw too but at a point in my childhood Istopped believing everything I was told along with reading this rediculous stroy book you live by that made me realize how narrow this bible view is I hope atno point in your life you have THOUGHT there is no holy spirit for that cannot be forgiven by your "god" and you should fear
The answer is, yes. Peter bore witness to God (The Almighty) giving Cornelius, his family, and close friends the gift of the anointing of the baptism of the Holy Ghost after they believed his (Gods) word concerning his Son Jesus Christ that he (Peter) taught them, as revealed in Acts 10:36 45. Today, God gives believers, as evidence of their salvation, the gift of the anointing of baptism of the Holy Ghost in this same manner; like Peter tells the Jews (Acts 5:32 and 15:8, 9, & 11).
Jews are never enslaved in Egypt, what else in their History is a lie?
Porrameneitor 1 day ago
Pharaoh that sitteth upon his throne, even unto the firstborn of the MAIDSERVANTS that [is] behind the mill; and all the firstborn of beasts.
But the bible says even "maid" servants so women were included as well as the males. So what's your response on that????.
Isaiahpriest 1 month ago
@Isaiahpriest Imhotep was NOT an Israelite...his father name was not IsraEl/Jacob mother name was NOT Rachel! like real talk kill the Bullshit. where is the archeological evidence for this? even Biblical reference??.. let me guess your of Hebrew Israelite faith saying he was Joseph huh? check the dates they dont match! 2650-2600 BC.. Jacob and his family arrived in Egypt around 1880 BC..LIKE WTF? I guess he was worshiping Amen Re an not Yahweh..because Imhotep was also a high priest..
BahamasIllestMC 1 month ago
@BahamasIllestMC I never said Imhotep was the son of Jacob nor did I say he was Joseph. Your dates come from the crackers who still claim the earth is a million years old which is nonsense nor is there any proof.
Isaiahpriest 1 month ago
smh the poor guys are scared to be invaded by israel
tonsyidibe 2 months ago in playlist Rulers of Egypt
This has been flagged as spam show
Jews are so smart, they don't even need to lie to fool you. Just as long as you don't disagree with them. Or dare try agreeing to disagree with them. Churches today, as in Christ Jesus's day, are there to put spiritual walls between the father and his sons as well as the truth that the germanic race that spawned all white people, including most jews, are the israelites. Truth hurts for supremacists and cowards.
oveid 2 months ago
The Hyksos came from Arabia according to Velikovsky work in the subject. Even in the Bible it mentions, after expulsion of the Israelites, that they fought the Amalekites.
Amalekites=Hyksos
itzoma 3 months ago
@itzoman Amalekites=Hyksos we do not know that for sure. in fact all of this is speculation and conjecture. cultures and civilizations come and go we can only make guesses as to what actually happened. many ppl say the hyksos were the Israelites now you say something different. this all teaches us that we must write our history and leave a clear and understandable legacy behind for the future. Peace!
nublackmusic 3 months ago
I found OLD books from three different eras that went into details on who the Hyksos were but no they were not white.
BeautifulDances 6 months ago
@BeautifulDances If you look at Egyptian wall paintings something very much overlooked in these kinds of inevitable and racially-charged discussions: The people who inhabited Canaan and Libya and the Sinai and Syria are all depicted as having fair skin and not kinky hair. Even the Egyptians themselves depict a variety of skin colours living in Egypt, not just foreigners, but Egyptians. I'm not trying to argue for something retarded like the actors in the Ten Commandments.
Bimfirestarter 5 months ago
@Bimfirestarter I happen to be black, Jamaican dad, Guyanese mum, and I've been a keen studier of Egyptology and ancient near eastern history since I was a little kid, and this much I've learned from what the Bible says and what the ancients said and what 'modern' people (especially black supremacist types) say: Ages ago, if you had fair skin but 'african' features, you were called white, but now you get called black. PRINCE with his fair complexion would've been called white in ancient times.
Bimfirestarter 5 months ago
The periodic migrations of Canaanite people is a fact, that was governed by the relative predictability of the flooding of the Nile and its ability to provide water for the crops as opposed to the recurring famines in Canaan. It was not an EVENT. It was a recurring phenomenon. But again there is NO EVIDENCE of 600,000 men (not counting women and children) wandering through the desert for 40 years. Zero, Zilch,nada, nothing for around 1 million people?????????????
blublu451 10 months ago
The reason that blbical scholars, that is people with an agenda, clearly not archeologists (as can be seen by the interview with John Bimson from the self proclaimed Christian college) are "breaking with that consensus" is their bias for historical accuracy of the bible. But Exodus itself is naming the cities built by the Israelites as "Pithon and Rameses" Exodus 1-11. Rameses is the name of the Pharaoh. The hyksos were expelled by Ahmose. That is intellectual dishonesty.
blublu451 10 months ago
Comment removed
mitukats 1 year ago
The Hyskos were not Isrealites, thE BIBLE WAS RIGHT, aBRAHAM WAS SCARED OF THE eGYPTIANS . THESE PEOPLE SHARED THE SAME RELIGION AND DID NOT PRACTICE ANY MONOTHEISM. THESE PEOPLE WERE JUST INVADERS. pERIOD THEY COULD HAVE BEEN ANYONE FOR ALL WE KNOW . BUT THEY WERE NOT iSREALITES PLUS THEY WERE EXPELLED. nOT JUST SLAVES.
MrMarshall1980 1 year ago
I heard Avaris (or Avarice, meaning "Greed") was also called Zaru or Zion... Anyone else hear of this?
sumguyzercomin 1 year ago
lol.. so funny how the most HIGH exposes truth... WHY ARE THESE ISREALITES in the paintings BROWN or "BLACK PEOPLE"??????Lines up perfectlyan with the so called African Americans and the Book of Deut..inb the bible
EarthAngel504 1 year ago
@EarthAngel504 Yes I agree ..first called negros, then coloured, then black, then and now the so called african (by so called educated negroes). The Hebrews that dwelt in Hebron (Thence Hebrew) were the Hyksos of Egypt (Bondage)/Mizriam. The same blood line that is in the so called americas. Gods chosen. Look at history Isreals captivities have always been by the head of the world, thus making Isreal the tail. Here we are in our last captivity. To prove this go to anytown usa and go to
dyabraham 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
even if the hebrews were hyksos that does'nt mean they have any thing to do with modernday israel, because judaism is a religon not a race .by the way amo israel means people of israel not gods people
PROJEK3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
even if the hebrews were hyksos that does'nt mean they have any thing to do with modernday israel because judaism is a religon not a race .by the way amo israel means people of israel not gods people
PROJEK3 1 year ago
Comment removed
PROJEK3 1 year ago
Great movie! Thank you for posting a clip here.
TalyaRaphaella 1 year ago
if i already havent found enough evidence for Biblical stories ive found another one, Bible is truth, God is real and Jesus Christ is coming back soon.
danwazhere7 1 year ago
ahahah thats right ISRAELITES always make shit pop!!!! You silly jacob for buying into all this ridiculous HAMITE trash...oh well Egypt is a dusk bowl and has not been recognized as a modern economic power since the days of Cesaer. Rome, Greece and Israel (kharzar's Israel) is still powerful and regulating shit in the world.
BlackJesus2153000 1 year ago
Did anybody ever wonder even the mummies clearly in this video could be from greco roman period? Eventhough egyptologist would want use to believe they are from the valley of the kings. But even the famous ramses mummy doesn't even look like him on the statue. Makes me wonder how the europeons been trying to use non native mummies to pose off as ancient egyptians. I can't trust anything they do. They even making fake statues of ancient egyptians.
Thutmosis7 1 year ago
You can clearly see that those modern day egyptians are foreigners or descendant of conquerers from the late dynasty-arab take over in 640 C.E. They look like syrian arabs and yemenites. Some look saudi and iraqis. They don't look like ancient egyptians.
Thutmosis7 1 year ago
this is suchhh bullshit
noblewulfff 1 year ago
Which part of Asia are the Hyksos?
dantankun 1 year ago
I like this video. People need to realize that the bible is still satanic. Read the bible carefully people and peep what Satan is saying to you people what God said to Satan, and Satan is not the white man dammit. Satan is Satan, period.
bds10181978 1 year ago
He has this correct. Sorry to the traditional guys like Dwyer but there is obviously a disconnect of a few hundred years that becomes so.. well so obvious.. clearly the Hyksos/Exodus is something one to do with the other.
What is always strange to me... its actually guys like Dwyer that are obsessed with making Egyptian dates NOT coincide with Hebrew dates and I think he is the doing that so as to discredit the Bible.
We ought admit another thing - Egyptians are not the 'gold standard' dates.
ElProximo 1 year ago
loool r they kidding all historians!!!
lekhchine 1 year ago
NEVER take any thing white historian claim to be true , they are PASID to fabricate fairy tales to support their racist agenda, why do you thing al ancient sites are prohibited from the public . somone might sumble on the truth. they can"t have that.
7troding 1 year ago
lol they blame egypt for the obvious fact that the exodus is a myth & nothing more.
danmanjones 1 year ago
The holy bible is just simply about color and black played a huge role in the bible people, like it or not. So please people, read the bible carefully.
5 Stars
18ThinkBlue 1 year ago 2
Of course the wall paintings are of the Hebrews/Jews/Hyksos. They were in Avaris. That's where they really stayed not in the desert as the 'bible' claims. DNA sampling has been done on a number of mummies from Egypts important tombs and they find semitic blood. Google it. I'm not using the bible as a fact book, I rail against it and think based on findings that the Hebrews were actually Hyksos. Not slaves but barbaric invaders. Probably originated in Sumer long ago.
dmgcat 1 year ago
Jews are the Hyksos. They go to great lengths to hide that fact but Archeology and DNA tests do not lie. Moses was the last Hyksos king who took his people to Avaris. These are Semitic blooded people AND they spoke Aramaic predominately. If you believe these groups were different then why no writing by the 'Jews' describing their Hyksos masters? Because they were the Hyksos and Abraham was the first Hyksos king.The Jews deny this. Moses parted the sea? As much as Charleton Heston did.
dmgcat 1 year ago
@dmgcat
What archaeology and DNA tests support that?
Futhermore, why are walled paintings and statues of the hyksos depicted differently from the later depictions of hebrews?
Now that the hyksos might have been semitic and aramaic speaking that is possible, but that does not necessarily connect them to the hebrews.
The Bible is not historical fact but at some places it might depict events with a real historical basis. And if they once ruled the egyptians they would have surely mention it.
darkdanu89 1 year ago
I think it's safer to assume the hyksos were either hurrians, proto-hittites or canaanites and not hebrews.
The hyksos came with 2 wheeled chariots, wich were introduced by either hurrians or proto hittites.
By contrast in the Bible the hebrews only mention enemy chariots (of the egyptians, canaanites and philistines).
So if the hebrews were hyksos why didnt they have chariots?
Hyksos more likely were a hurrian population, as in their time the hurrians werent unified yet, so might have migrated.
darkdanu89 1 year ago
@darkdanu89 yOU ON POINT WITH YOUR HISTORY BRO . YOU MAKE MORE SENSE THAN ANY OF THESE CLOWNS
MrMarshall1980 1 year ago
The word "hyksos" comes from heka khasewet, which means "foreign rulers" and was used by the Egyptians to describe the kings of nearby areas. During the Second Intermediate Period, the Hyksos invaded Egypt and formed the 15th Dynasty that ruled Lower Egypt for just over one hundred years.
I LOVE THEM
hyksos99 1 year ago
don't believe this video or this man. I research it. It is a fraud.
CloudsofBliss 1 year ago
I was also taught that they invented the chariot and that was one reason the fighting went on so long, and they were not defeated. I sure do wish educators would be more educated, and that educations itself was much different:(
shellylanette 1 year ago
Exodus decoded is full of fallacies.
refuckulate420 2 years ago
The ancient truths can never be buried.
goldenscales 2 years ago
@goldenscales
Its all lies. The exodus never took place, it was Ahmoses I who drive the Hyksos out after the invade and enslaved us. It is written on Kemet walls, now they turn the story around! The Hyksos are Hebrews/Jews/Khazars who constantly changed their identity to cover up their crimes! See full evidence in the series called 'The Hyksos' by the user blackson1977.
None of the bible characters are real & proven to be Egyptian pharaohs whose history & identity they use as prototype.
kevine316 2 years ago 2
I was taught the Hyksos were from northern Syria and invaded week Egypt was weak from the Nile drying. They brought the horse n charriot n advanced battle tactics. They were driven out after 100 years.
salinagrrrl69 2 years ago
You've been serious MISEDUCATED. 1st, Hyksos broght NO chariots into Egypt. 2nd, the Hyksos were not only Syrians, they're Amorites(Syrians & Semite Canaanites who invaded these lands & got their God El from the native(black) Canaanites from Kemet) and they were also Hittite(Turks & Greeks) who are the real jews who are exploiting us out our minds.
The only thing they had over the ancient Egyptians was that they were great barbarians from Asia with great weapons as they live in a state of war.
kevine316 2 years ago
I read the discourse of a lecture called something like "Ramses & the Hitites - Round II" As the premiss was that the Hyksos were ancient 2nd cousins of the Hitites. I had always been taught that the Hyksos brought the chariot and found no depictions of chariots previous to the time of that invasion.
I saw donkey drawn smaller versions but those had been around for ages from Egypt to ancient Ur.
salinagrrrl69 2 years ago
Tut like many young adolescent love or dream of ahving a set of wheels. He had a good set buried with him.
Anyhow it was said that the Hyksos brought weapons the that were far more advanced than the dated Egyptians' like composite bows (tech fr/ China) & mounted archers (tactic from the stehp of Russia). The Egyptions in their isolation had weapons that were 1000 years out of date. Formaly subjucated Upper Egypt fought off & resisted the Hyksos for 100 years & were never conquered.
salinagrrrl69 2 years ago
Comment removed
kevine316 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@salinagrrrl69
Pharaoh Tut's injuries were consistent with injuries sustained by plane crash victims & at the Seti Temple, Abydos we have seen tablets of planes, helicopters and submarines so how dare you tell the world he could only dream of wheels!
The Hyksos invaded in the 12th dynasty when buildings & civilisations already in placed! R u telling us that they build the pyramids & buildings which would involved invention of cranes, yet they knew nothing about wheels? Hummnn. Think!
kevine316 2 years ago
RE-Read what I wrote: "Tut like many young adolescent love or dream of ahving a set of wheels. He had a good set buried with him."
So I have to believe you should be on some sort of medication or have same said adjusted. "Helicopters"?! "Submariens"?! Heck with those they could have taken over the world! LOL!
salinagrrrl69 2 years ago
@salinagrrrl69
I could do with a bit of verbal exercise but I will not bother as it is clear you are the one who is on medication! Our Kemet ancestors have been building mega structure prior to the Hyksos & even before coming down the Nile from Buganda to Ethiopia and Sudan/Nubia! See the tablets on the background image on my channel proving we invented plane, helicopter & submarine! Unless you are claiming that Tut was descendant of Hyksos but we have his photo inside his tomb & he is black!
kevine316 2 years ago
@goldenscales
The Hyksos are Hebrews/Jews/Khazars with a criminal past. The attacked countries seeking work, enslave people and they destroyed the black civilisation. In modern history, majority of the slave ships were owned by them. Their identy had been exposed. It was originally exposed by Henry Ford, then by Arthur Kloser. They constantly reinvent their identity. We know who we are dealing with and there are lots of evidence out there!
kevine316 2 years ago
@goldenscales
If you watch the full evidence in the series called 'The Hyksos' by the user blackson1977 you will also see that 'Hebrew' was a term for 'coalition', a coalition of people who attacked Kemet/Egypt. It is not a name for a group of people. There is no history of a people called Hebrews, they are in fact proven to be Hyksos which were a term for 'Foreign Rulers' that came in from the sea.
kevine316 2 years ago
LOL the Amun (God's people)? Where does that say that? I thought Amun meant Hidden One and/or God of mystery?
DamienDragonetti 2 years ago
Hello and thank you for your comments. We would disagree with you on some things though. There was a group known as the Hibiru(Hebrews) in ancient kemet and there are writings which speak of them. also it was the White philistines who came in from the sea, the hyksos are said to be asiatics from the desert. our opinion is that is is all speculation. check with youtuber daudmusa he is very good on this subject. we think the best on youtube. Peace!
nublackmusic 2 years ago
@nublackmusic
SOOOO are the hebrews and hyksos the same people, if not are the hyksos people shemetic as well???
arab3515 1 year ago
@arab3515 As we said it is all speculation. they are thought to be desert dwelling asiatics, but that could mean anything. we do know that hyksos could refer to foreigners. so the hebrews could have been one of many different kinds of hyksos.
Peace!!
nublackmusic 1 year ago
@nublackmusic
yeah, their history does match so i think this deserves to be looked deeper into, THANKS FOR THIS VIDEO
arab3515 1 year ago
@arab3515 AND THEY LOOK DARK BECAUSE OF THE SUN BURN WHEN THEY SETTELED
BLAQAWEARNESS 1 year ago
@nublackmusic Quote from The JEWISH POST:,È About the Exodus, We basically have one account-the Torah's. When it comes to the historical analysis of the Exodus, we have only one account, and asserting the historical validity of an event that took place 3500 years ago on the basis of a single account does not put you on very solid historical footing.
The Exodus is not about history; it is about faith. If we could "prove" it, we would not need to have faith in it..-- End of quote
lizazoon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nublackmusic Quote from The JEWISH POST:,È About the Exodus, We basically have one account-the Torah's. When it comes to the historical analysis of the Exodus, we have only one account, and asserting the historical validity of an event that took place 3500 years ago on the basis of a single account does not put you on very solid historical footing.
The Exodus is not about history; it is about faith. If we could "prove" it, we would not need to have faith in it..-- End of quote
lizazoon 1 year ago
@nublackmusic The word Hyksos comes from Heka Khawaset it means foreign rulers. The word Asiatics denotes they come from the east. Now the debate is on dates. If they can give accurate dates. Well know who the Hyksos was.
beholdtheageofold 1 year ago
@beholdtheageofold I have seen that it means sheperd kings. Being a sheperd was an abomination to the people of Mizriam. The Isrealites were Sheperds and were Kings in Mizriam/Egypt (Bondage) the first started with Joseph/Yoseph/kophu/cheops. So, the term Hyksos was a way to degrade the Isrealites.
dyabraham 1 year ago
@dyabraham, Ive noticed some scholars give them the meaning of Shepard Kings. However Flavius Josephus in his work " Against Apion", states that they were shepherd kings. However my point is that they were foreign rulers. They weren't original from Egypt. I think the Hyksos were the sons of Abraham before Jacob had a nation.
beholdtheageofold 1 year ago
@beholdtheageofold just a hint to you... "Abraham" is another occult term and means "A'Brahm" or "Anti Brahman". Abraham was expelled from India (SARAswati area - where 1. Sanskrit Vedas were brought there by ancient Aryans ) and ran to Ur as ANTI ARYAN priest;his Anti Brahmanic doctrine of the CREATED ONES (opposite human - BORN ONES) - ADAPAS (Sumerian Adamas - Adamic "human" cross breeds - clones; Anunnaki = aliens, in india known as "demonic Naga&Asuras (as Osiris was))
VendPrekmurec 9 months ago
@beholdtheageofold there was also no "Exodus" from Egypt. "jews" were Hyksos and nobody else... Osiris was their "god" and Moses was Osiris's priest (source: Manetho, Flavius)... Osiris's name in Egypt was Ausar, in Assyria known as Assur, Ashur, in India known as Asura or Bakasura (greek Bacchus - Dyonisis to romans) and became "new Yehowa" or Yhwh under Moses. Moses's name was Osarphys from Heliopolis (sun city). He was a "Messiah" to Hyksos. His name in fact comes from Egyptian MES or MESSU
VendPrekmurec 9 months ago
@beholdtheageofold which means "giving a birth to... or also Titulus of Horus, son of ... " + Yah (Mes-Yah). And Yah or Yaw comes from old Slavic (Chaldean) "pagan" (Vedic) Yav (material); YHWH is also Astronomical Slavic "pagan" code of "gods" (Ba'al - Bull - Vol - Volos or Veles (Taurus) - constellation ) Hors or Horo (in Egypt known as Heru or Hor - Horus, represents a const. ) - before it became "forbbiden name of god"
VendPrekmurec 9 months ago
@nublackmusic I have seen that it means sheperd kings. Being a sheperd was an abomination to the people of Mizriam. The Isrealites were Sheperds and were Kings in Mizriam/Egypt (Bondage) the first started with Joseph/Yoseph/kophu/cheops. So, the term Hyksos was a way to degrade the Isrealites.
dyabraham 1 year ago
@nublackmusic The Hyksos were the first caucasions to invade Kemet after being grafted, they were not Melinated people!
marshbey 6 months ago
@marshbey They were melinated people. The first whites in Egypt were the Roman greeks but they were MIXED.
BeautifulDances 6 months ago
@BeautifulDances ok..whatever you say!! I see you got a good European Education!!
marshbey 6 months ago
@marshbey During the exodus Egyptians migrated with them. The books mentioned a tribe called Wodaabe??I do not think I spelled it right and Fulani so one out of the two or both have Egyptians mixed into their tribe. but you can see them in the African women and their tribe video.
BeautifulDances 6 months ago
@BeautifulDances It seems the Hebrews were quite tribal, and the Bible constantly makes mention of foreigners dwelling with them through the years after their Egyptian departure. Not just Egyptians left, but 'a vast mixed company' says the Bible.
Bimfirestarter 5 months ago
@marshbey But I do not think the Kente cloth is in India. It is West African. Hebrew cloth.
BeautifulDances 6 months ago
@nublackmusic They were black kinky hair and the kind of black people you find in Sri Lanka with straight hair they were not white. The kente cloth is proof. You find that in west Africa and around India where the darkest black Indians live. They were no where close to white European
BeautifulDances 6 months ago
@arab3515 HYKSOS WERE WHITE
BLAQAWEARNESS 1 year ago
@BLAQAWEARNESS
wat makes you think that bro?? many pictures that i see of hyksos are people of color.
arab3515 1 year ago
@arab3515 THEY WERE ROMANS GREEKS AND SPAINARDS THAT INVADED TH NORTH
BLAQAWEARNESS 1 year ago
@arab3515 IT STILL HAPPENS TODAY WITH WHITES
BLAQAWEARNESS 1 year ago
@BLAQAWEARNESS but on the egyptian paintings they look just as dark as the egyptians if not darker.IDK I COULD BE WRONG AS YOU CAN PROBABLY TELL, I DONT KNOW MUCH ABOUT HYKSOS. i actually heard last from sombody else that they were white. but it seems alittle off. i think that only time can tell because in ancient ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME. IT WAS RULED BY BLACK SKINNED PEOPLE. ACTUALLY ALOT OF EUROPE WAS RULED BY BLACKS. so it really depends on when the hyksos came to egypt
arab3515 1 year ago
@arab3515 you are correct blacks populated the world prior to whites/cannanites 6,000 to8,000 yrs max also note that if the hyksos wasnt white there will be no need for the war at all they was trying to supplant the original dark black nubian egyption they the hyksos could be blamed for the later egyptions looking brown skin tan etc they took over the north then mixed with the dark original nubians
BLAQAWEARNESS 1 year ago
@BLAQAWEARNESS yeah you have a good point, for some reason white people tend to mix with darker people as a form of sexual genocide. but dont you think its strange that the hyksos and the hebrews both have a similar historical pattern??
arab3515 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@arab3515 (for some reason white people tend to mix with darker people as a form of sexual genocide) bro you are on money thats one of there objectives inerbreeding
the only people wins is whites because they have the least melanin outta all us so it helps them as far as mixing in just to mix out another form of vampireism
BLAQAWEARNESS 1 year ago
@arab3515 the hebrews are different they come from the line of abraham just like mine and your forefathers im making a nuwaubian vid that will explain that soon. but the hyksos come from cannan sons they came together to take out egypt they did untill thutmose took it back
BLAQAWEARNESS 1 year ago
@BLAQAWEARNESS yes i am aware that we are hebrews, but i wasnt sure about the hyksos thing, it is strange that we have similar history though....but anyway, let me get this strait, so did the hyksos enter egypt as white people and leave black (or with somewhat of a dark skin than what they had before??) or were they still white???
arab3515 1 year ago
@arab3515 i feel you.the Spartans, Greeks,romans, (hyksos)came in pale but after the invasion they got sun tanned and alot of there children came out mulatto so after time of mixing on top of the tan from the sun they appared to be original but they wasnt
BLAQAWEARNESS 1 year ago
@arab3515 No white people were in egypt until the late dynastic period. The whole hyksos story is a eurocentric invention created by ashkenazi jewish people to place themself in ancient egyptian history. If there is no writing on the temples or hieroglyphics picture to prove it, it's not true. The whole story was created in the late 19th century. The only so call source they claim it came from is some greek roman guy name manetho, who they can't find his original text to support it.
Thutmosis7 1 year ago
@Thutmosis7 good lookin out brotha
arab3515 1 year ago
@arab3515 Anytime bro.
Thutmosis7 1 year ago
@BLAQAWEARNESS The hyksos never exists. That's just a fictional people. There is no source on the temple wall of ancient egypt that suggest these people were ever in egypt, and if they did, they rule anything. Only one people could of fit that description of the so call hyksos and it's the assyrians. But no people ever before that rule egypt. No no african ever rule egypt, until the persians which came from iran conquer it. From Dynastic period 3400 B.C-525 B.C were rule by african faraohs.
Thutmosis7 1 year ago
@arab3515 I think the mainstream view is that they were not. But, there are similarities of the two people that cant be explained. I believe a lot of Bible believers (including myself) look at it that if its not in the Bible, its not true. The Bibles Exodus and the Hysos expulsion dosent look anything alike...if you believe everything that was written in the Bible was all that happened.
arkansasbean 1 year ago
@arkansasbean
yeah now that i gave it alittle more thought, it whos to say that the hyksos came bit later than the hebrews, or what if they came a bit earlier than the hebrews, either way it could be possible and make sense of why they would have been expelled from egypt
arab3515 1 year ago
@arab3515 The Hyksos weren't Hebrews, but Canaanites. Their remains show them as Baal-worshippers and worshippers of others besides Baal. If the dating of them is anywhere near accurate by archaeologists, then it would appear that Joseph came to power while the Hyksos were in control of Egypt, and once the Hyksos were expelled, 'a new pharaoh arose who didn't know Joseph', and the Egyptians turned and enslaved the Hebrews 'lest war come up and they join our enemies' as Exodus says. One theory-
Bimfirestarter 5 months ago
@nublackmusic "Hibiru"... the term (in fact) comes from term "Nibiru", in Sumerian known as "cross over - blood ". English version is "Hybrid (Hibiru)... Original "hebrews" (breed- cross breed) were Afro Semites, their "jewish"(Hykso) "god" was Osiris and Moses was Osiris's priest (source: Manetho). Osiris was in egypt known "Ausar", in Assyria as Assur, in India as Asura (Bakasura - to greeks known as Bacchus) and became "Yehova" or Yaw under Moses...
VendPrekmurec 9 months ago
@nublackmusic Who is this "we" you speak of?
WelfareSymphony 9 months ago
@DamienDragonetti
New pictures of Hyksos statues have been found: The Egyptologist François Auguste Ferdinand Mariette (February 11, 1821 – January 19, 1881), had them stashed away in his scrapbook. You will find them very interesting.
We can't post web links, so cut and paste this address, then add the necessary parts like (COM)
realhistoryww._/world_history/ancient/Canaan_1aa.htm
AncientHistorian1 1 year ago
@DamienDragonetti He didn't say 'Amun' but 'Amo Israel' as if it meant 'People of God'. The Egyptian records mention these 'amu' which some say could have included the Israelites, but it certainly wasn't exclusive to one people, but a kind of people, like the word nomads can refer to many tribes throughout the ages. This Simcha who narrates makes the error of twisting the facts to support a theory; 'Amo' in Hebrew means 'his people'; 'Israel' is the name God gave Jacob, means 'God contends'.
Bimfirestarter 5 months ago
and yea u gotdamn right i said KUSH
THATNIGGBOOBOO 2 years ago
my dudes...
hyksos are mud ppl... aka ppl of mixd decent and origin, sorta like americans
they were nomadic, aka hustla's who got some fly weapons from asia n came to the norhtern most part of the kush empire duiring a time of turmoil, they stopped paying taxes and eventually reorganized the governmental structure... u know like when the pilgrims came here?... go aheah and hate now
THATNIGGBOOBOO 2 years ago
this horseshit
jabdi 2 years ago
People will do anything to disprove the Bible. The jews were in egypt under completly different circunstances than the hycsos. Their final destination after leaving egypt was different. Their priorities were different. Not the same people or event.
chukurulugai 2 years ago
So who were the Hyksos, the Habiru? Or other Semites?
mikeblaze2e 2 years ago
Comment removed
ZeeGooner 2 years ago
Is it so ridiculous to understand the real assimilation of these people?
LBPBumout 2 years ago
I do not wish to argue but understand why you follow/serve as you do. So if you would please answer the questions I have posed to you instead of dancing around them in pompousity. All you do is quote like all the rest never answering or even making a valid point just quoting as a follower does. Ingraine those words in your mind, waste your life in your closed view. But the least you could do to show your sanity is explain why you feel the way you do. If you so firmly believe them why avoid?
s1deicide 2 years ago
Then you just answered your own question, you just said that you understand why, so why keep asking me the same question, that I already answered to you? Wake up and grow up, Shalom!
dvining40us 2 years ago
I was saying I wish to understand why.
s1deicide 2 years ago
Blessed are those who hear, and who keep the saying of this(Book/Bible) so if you think that I think that I am more superior then you, then I must be doing something right. I love Christ because He first loved me, and gave Himself for me, is that an answer enough for you? And the world was in need of a Savior. He's my Savior and I am not ashamed to tell you why. By the way, everything you know comes from a book of some sort, so why not the Good Book/Bible?
dvining40us 2 years ago
I believe that the hyksos was in fact ancient israelites in egypt..
lwf706 2 years ago
Revelation 1 15And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.
Look up burned brass & you'll see that it's a dark brown color. The Bible sure never says or suggests otherwise, but I'll be the first to admit that now all who run with the "Hebrew Israelite" mantra don't know what they're talking about & do regurgitate things said by others, but a lot of us are true, diligent, & studious of the truth & the attempts to hide it.
vghopkins 2 years ago
"as if they burned in a furnace" is present tense meaning that they were glowing....there is no such thing as fine burnt brass ...that would render it unfine. And brass is nowhere even near the color of ebony.
sugarhitman 2 years ago
You can't even front like you've never seen this video either, LOL Look at you son! Fast forward 6 minutes in & you can't even deny the HARD evidence. The writing's on the wall chump! Those people on the wall are the same shade of brown I am, LOL!
You FAIL again Timmy, you're totally pathetic with not a single leg to stand on. I've killed you w/ hard evidence & the scriptures! AND you contradicted yourself! LIAR! LOL! The SNAKE is caught again!!!
Accept the TRUTH & shall set you free Khazar!
vghopkins 2 years ago 4
@vghopkins LOL! Those are clearly Semitic peoples with a ruddy bronze color, vs the black paint used for Nubians...in the book of gates they are painted with yellow paint and are shown to be not Nubians. You BHs are self-hating blacks searching for an alternative indentity hyjacking in the process.
sugarhitman 2 years ago
No Timmy, no, ROFLMAO...you're in denial & it's SAD & PITIFUL...
vghopkins 2 years ago 2
@vghopkins Look at the faces and the hooked noses clearly Semites...and not Nubians...a blind man can see that.
sugarhitman 2 years ago
I've read the Bible, the Qu'ran, & the Tanakh. So I issue a challenge to you to give me examples of where the Bible contradicts itself, and I'll prove to you that it doesn't, on the stipulation that you post at least 3 verses to try to keep it in the original context of how it was written.
On the subject of the Mashiach's color, it is not only likened to fine brass, as if burned in a furnace, in Revelation, but also in Daniel.
If you would know that if you read the Bible.
(cont'd)
vghopkins 2 years ago
We know Imhotep existed, but there is NO proof, outside of the bible, of a man named Joseph who lived in Kemet. There is also no proof of a man named Potipher. Also, Im not sure if I would want to waste my time giving you contradictions in the bible. From the way you come off, you don't seem very open minded and you also seem set in your ways. I could give you numerical contradictions that are plain to see and you will discard them as not being contradictions.
PitbullD 2 years ago
No, I was open minded enough to understand the whitewashing of history. I was a truther first & I was like you too, thinking the Bible was false & contradicted itself & I got away from it. Then I learned WHY certain things didn't stack up when I read in the Bible ITSELF, that "they" would try to edit it & also manipulate it behind a man-made traditional doctrine.
So I went to the Hebrew & the Greek on MY OWN, along with Islam, Kemet, Wiccan, & other pantheons. (cont'd)
vghopkins 2 years ago
@PitbullD Joseph isn't even a Hebrew name. He could have been called Imhotep by the Egyptians. This doesn't disprove the theory that Joseph and Imhotep is the same person.
HouriBee 8 months ago
@HouriBee man how the fuck could Imohotep be Joseph? really now? just more attempts to take Afrcian achievements away from Africans...even goin by the bible thats bullshit... Imhotep lived around 2655 BC during the 3rd dynasty and Joseph around 1700 B.C..if Jews was really enslaved by Egyptians then how is it none of their language was changed?.. the slaves of EVERY society adopt the language of their oppressors,
no exceptions!! same reason why black people in USA speak English now..430years?
BahamasIllestMC 5 months ago
@BahamasIllestMC this times were different my friend. JEws in many parts of the world, Persia, Rome, Greece, Europe and yet they still havn't lost their Hebrew language. PLease stop with that Black supremacy is ridiculous your not different from the KKK. Black people supremacist want to feel as the shit just because they think Egypt was the first civilization.
freest2dogg 5 months ago
@BahamasIllestMC But they are saying Imohotep was an Israelite.
Isaiahpriest 1 month ago
I mean they can find Egyptian tombs all the way in Israel but cant find one artifact of Ancient Israel..
BahamasIllestMC 5 months ago
You talk about the mashiach having skin like brass but you are wrong. It says his face and hair were WHITE. And eyes like fire. So i guess jesus had fire for eyes too. IT DOESNT MAKE SENSE LITERALLY. That is because it is to be taken metaphorically. I can also give you contradiction but i would rather send them to you threw a message than on here.
PitbullD 2 years ago
Do you realize what you said? It doesn't make sense literally because it was a metaphor? Of course, & what is a metaphor?
So, it's says his HEAD & his HAIR were WHITE like WOOL. (White wooly hair, & his face was glowing), Eyes of flame (his eyes were glowing or bright like fire) & his feet was of fine brass as if burned in a furnace (his skin was that color).
Where's the contradiction? It's noted exactly the same in Daniel 10 as well.
Go ahead & email to me.
vghopkins 2 years ago
I didn't say there was a contradiction in this section. Also i would like to point out that it DOES NOT say his hair was like wool. it says that it is WHITE like wool. The main point was on the color and not the texture.
PitbullD 2 years ago
Daniel 7
9I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the HAIR OF HIS HEAD LIKE THE PURE WOOL: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
&
Isaiah 28
10For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little:
The OT majorly prophesies the NT which quotes the OT. No fallacy at all if you know the Word.
I'm still waiting for that email.
vghopkins 2 years ago 2
Most of the anti-Christian posts on this video fall into a common assumption, which is that the Bible should not be used as a reliable historical text. The books which comprise the Bible are as reliable as any other ancient primary sources. The so-called "spiritual" content found therein is also present in most bodies of ancient sources, so why don't you discredit them as well? When dealing in ancient sources, one will be hard pressed to find anything completely devoid of theological content.
Gomanson 2 years ago
No evidence of slave in egypt, the pharoh was a god king so it was an honor to buld his tomb which was the pyramid
DRdisaster007 2 years ago
The Bible isn't reliable, it's filled with contradictions and Anachronism.
MrCaine 2 years ago
Correct cause the bible is written by BABYLON(meaning confusion) so are many other religious books but scriptures are written by The People of the GOOD BOOK.
and puts an end to my identity crissis i was born in to. But one things for shure
HIstory speeks for it self.
And it tells a biblical story i'm saying hmmmm....
tightladyshy 2 years ago
... lol wut
MrCaine 2 years ago
lol of course people would make this 5 stars! its the truth they existed in Israel thats because the invaded the land and then they took over Egypt after they were taught civilization, we gotta do our history, the truth will not be revealed because it would change history and uplift a certain people, theres really only 1 lost people on this planet with no known history who were put into slaves and get no reparations and the most hated today.
tempman1000 2 years ago
Damn Those people look like Ethiopians ahhahaha AshKenazi Jews my ass
NnuShuSebTaht 2 years ago
Why would the egyptians call the invading goat-herders God's people, that makes no sense.
ArchhereticK 2 years ago
Because they were the hebrew Israelites , the Hebrew Israelites had always been shepherds of goats and sheep.
Isaiahpriest 2 years ago 4
Looks to me like the Jews are still looking for a place in Ancient History by changing dates and events. The Truth needs no support. If they (jews) were in Kemet and all those plagues took place, the Kemmieu would have documented them. Too bad! No jews in Kemet!! I wonder what they will come up with next?
SqnnRa 2 years ago
@ SqnnRa Not too long ago they found Egyptians chariots at the bottom of the northern part of the Red sea which sits in one of their museums. No one likes to record a good ass whipping especially if their hands are too short to fight wth YAHAWAH
shaparnapash 2 years ago
Answer ARC
Gen 46:32 And the men are shepherds, for their TRADE hath been to feed cattle; and they have brought their FLOCKS, and their HERDS, and all that they have. 46:33 And it shall come to pass, when Pharaoh shall call you, and shall say, What is your occupation? 46:34 That ye shall say, Thy servants TRADE hath been about CATTLE from our YOUTH even until NOW, both we, and also our fathers: that ye may dwell in the land of Goshen; for every shepherd is an abomination unto the Egyptians.
Isaiahpriest 2 years ago
Comment removed
xNazelyx 3 years ago
Wow xNazelyx. Do you realize what you're saying? Turkey became a secular state 1908. Secular is code for country run by Freemasons and Jews.
So if the Jews consider themselves God's people, but this Doco is saying that God's people are the Hyksos.
And then you're saying the Hyksos are the Armenians/ Hayk. But there can't be 2 God's people. Someone had to go.
This is probably why the 1915 Armenian genocide happened. Jews were in charge of secular Turkey back then, and still are today.
majorcatch22 3 years ago
Wrong the Hebrew Israelites were only seventy souls and later became a great nation. There are a couple of names written of the hebrew israelites which were Black people Shepherd Kings and Hyksos. All them were Black people because Joseph brothers didn't recognize him because the Egyptians were dark skin people like Joseph.
Isaiahpriest 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
xNazelyx 3 years ago
You stupid as hell . all mountains on the eath are shape like a ""A""
Isaiahpriest 2 years ago
So the Jews now want to claim some of Egypt. Imagine that I move out of a house that becomes yours and I stay out for 50 years. Then I decided it is mine and that you have to leave. The Jews are never going to stop.
avapplication 3 years ago
The White Jews which are really the not ( Rev. 2:9, 3:9) Read in Isaiah 29:22 Jacob face shall not wax pale. The white man is a culture bandit and a murderer
Isaiahpriest 2 years ago 5
Your book is limiting your mind. It is obvious from what you've just said. You are a fool for this, but you are not to blame for your ignorance, I pity your so very limited view of the world and existence. I hope that one day knowledge will prevail within your mind and you may begin to truely live life, with understanding.
s1deicide 2 years ago
Whatever you bring I can answer it through the Power of Israel who his name is Yahawah. Any question pertaining to who we R so let's begin !
Black people love to be a slave to all nations stop trying to be a slave to the Egyptians , the Arabs , the White race. Be a servant to Yahawah who can keep U safe and well.
The Prophet Jeremiah 2:14 Is Israel a servant? is he a homeborn slave? why is he spoiled?
Cuz Negroes want to be slaves to the Egyptians, Arabs and White People.
Bring it
Isaiahpriest 2 years ago
Thanks you obviously absorbed none of what I've said.
Why would you bow in service to something which you've not percieved for yourself. You must keep yourself safe and well, as is obviously possible for I've been able to do so, cursing all gods the entire time.
There is much more to existance then your narrow minded religion allows you to know. It keeps you within its confines limiting to the existance it tells. Why FOLLOW a religion that says one was a god(jesus) not all of us as we are.
s1deicide 2 years ago
Just the simple fact that the stories of the christian bible come from religions of thousands of years before, from various cultures. This alone should raise many questions, the biggest of which being. Why is this religion so special that it was true and all OLDER religions are false?(Not retourical I'm really asking you)
s1deicide 2 years ago
How can it be a Christian Bible ? Is that what you assume because the people of a religion use it as a prop ? Christianity is the religion of the white race forsed down the minds of their slaves. All religions are paganism from all the heathen nations. We are the biblical Israelites and only by seed can you be an Israelite oppose to religion anyone can join a religious cult.
Israelites in the bible are a people not a religion. The Biblie talks about laws which christians do not follow laws.
Isaiahpriest 2 years ago 2
Christian are even close to the truth nor do they recognize Christ being a Savior only to Israel. What does Christian mean ? It means anointed followers o Christ Christ followed the law (Matt 5:17-19) Christians cast the law behind them.
Paul an Israelite whom the Christians love quoting his scripture but Paul also said we establish the law , Romans 2:13, Romans 3:31, Romans 7:1. Christians tot the bible but do not follow the bible.
shaparnapash 2 years ago 2
That's nice, you have a single point of referance for all your "spiritual" information, which isn't spiritual at all. If you wish to FIND truths, instead of just being close you should search yourself. Personally I would say a combination of teachings from several Indian religions(Hinduism, Jainism, Brahamism..etc) to be "even closer" as you put it. You should look into them.
s1deicide 2 years ago
Why look into the heathens when i can look at my own people . What my own people aren't spirirtual enough?
If any people on the face of the earth there's one people who is spiritual is Black people in America. There a stigma that shows world or the other nations our spirituality is that saying "Gifted" and "Black".
I have never heard this saying applied to any other nation but us and certainly not even those fithy Africans.
Isaiahpriest 2 years ago
You might want to talk to a Christian about the Greeco-Roman god called jesus who is not of the bible but of that religion called Christianity.
Psalms 96:5 For all the gods of the nations are idols: but the LORD made the heavens.
Isaiah 30:22 YE (We) shall DEFILE also the covering of thy graven images of silver, and the ornament of thy molten images of gold: thou (We) shalt CAST them away as a MENTRUSOUS cloth (as Bloody cotex); thou shalt say unto it, Get thee hence.
Isaiahpriest 2 years ago 2
Do you draw all of your knowledge from one book. Where did you learn of a greco-roman god jesus, unless you mean Horus which means, son of Isis as does jesus
s1deicide 2 years ago
Our slave masters who beat the backs of my forefathers and mothers.
And as far as Horus aka Heru all that foolishness the Greeks adopted that pagan foolishness from Egypt and Egypt from Babel in the land of Shinar
Isaiahpriest 2 years ago
All religion is foolishness, it is a skewing and plagerization of old stories. Why is their's any more foolish than yours?
s1deicide 2 years ago
@s1deicide
The answer is very simple Because what was said by Moses in his prophecy about Israelites came to be TRUE!!!!
Negroes did return into the house of Bondage a second time but with ships. Jeremiah prophesied Israelites would be discontined from their heritage and serve their enenimes in a land that is not their own . You ask a grown ass 10 Black or Hispanic man or woman What is their true heritage or identity you'll get 10 different answers.
Isaiahpriest 2 years ago
you couldn't have said this any better, i totally agree with you!
brinny776 2 years ago
Secondly you cannot prove to anyone that you are the people of Khemet through writings of prophecies.
I ask this question last week and no one of Kemet and sent a reply to this question.
shaparnapash 2 years ago
Why would you want to follow a god who wanted to keep the supposed "first man and woman" from knowledge? A god who promotes ignorance and blindness to reality.
s1deicide 2 years ago
It seems this one book i draw all my knowledge from is suffient enough to crush all that garbage of books you study from since you cannot answer my two questions.
Here it goes from the scriptures of my one book concerning all your books :
Eccles. 12:12 And further, by these, my son, be ADMONISHED (To Warn): of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh.
shaparnapash 2 years ago
I don't even know what your 2 questions were. Have you ever opened your chakras and meditated? The verse you quoted continues on to say to fear god and he will be judge of all your work good or evil(summerised) Why would you want to live in fear? There is no judgement, karma, not judgement. Why is there no secular evidence of any jesus christ existing? Especially if he was crucified during passover. Why does his life mirror the equinox Sun patterns?
s1deicide 2 years ago
Surely a god who would keep his peoples from knowledge would want the to read only one book for knowledge. You may quote, and quote, and quote, and think you understand, but it takes self realization of a higher self and consciousness to begin to truely understand.
s1deicide 2 years ago
You Blasphemer.....by your words you shall be justifired and by your own words you shall be condemend!!!
dvining40us 2 years ago
I'm sorry you have to live your life in fear of condemnation It makes me wonder how much smaller christianity would be without its fear factor I used to look at life through a straw too but at a point in my childhood Istopped believing everything I was told along with reading this rediculous stroy book you live by that made me realize how narrow this bible view is I hope atno point in your life you have THOUGHT there is no holy spirit for that cannot be forgiven by your "god" and you should fear
s1deicide 2 years ago
The answer is, yes. Peter bore witness to God (The Almighty) giving Cornelius, his family, and close friends the gift of the anointing of the baptism of the Holy Ghost after they believed his (Gods) word concerning his Son Jesus Christ that he (Peter) taught them, as revealed in Acts 10:36 45. Today, God gives believers, as evidence of their salvation, the gift of the anointing of baptism of the Holy Ghost in this same manner; like Peter tells the Jews (Acts 5:32 and 15:8, 9, & 11).
dvining40us 2 years ago