So you want video proof from others to show a horse finishing in 2nd was actually first, but you can't show us a video proof of recreating a fake plane? Sounds unfair and evasive to me.
Attention Please: I want you all to realize this guy is pulling your legs and is not serious. Who in their right mind would try to claim this fantastic cover-up with Disney Font?
@CNN911Fakes Its simply a pano to right. In a distance and doing a general shot, you have time to correct the pano. And it seems a big shot zoomed. Now look at you, you are trying to show us tv manipulation but i dont know wich is your intention if that plane really crash to the tower. I cant understand what are your objectives with all this videos.
all this shows is a stationary camera tracking a moving object through a built up area!..how the hell can you come to the conclusion that you have!!..you are getting worse and worse mate!..as much as i love messaging you to tell you how inept you are at this investigation stuff, i cant help but laugh at what you consider to be evidence!.....please show me somehting that you have posted that is somewhat suspicious or has an element of doubt and fact about it!
@CNN911Fakes - As I mentioned to Jack, I finally got the finely-wrought play on words in the title. But, of course it doesn't really show Newton's 3rd, since there's no equal reaction upon the fake plane.
Now, OTOH, here is an cool example of Newton's 3rd on a real plane: /watch?v=Zl0MhOdkREQ
@nameofthepen But, unlike the teacher, I don't take them to the bathroom and I don't have to clean up when I don't. I have the ultimate power; to ignore as their bowels explode!
@jaxplane Thanks for showing up. You are right, the official story is nothing other than a lot of shit. I see you have honered me with another video, I look forward to seeing it and adding it to the detractor playlist.
@CNN911Fakes you say detractor, i say debunker )). I too sir are glad and honored to be on your list. Now if you would be so kind to explain to me any thing that had to do with newton's third law. You try to make some inane point about the buildings whizzing past the plane, this is expected when recording the plane. If you want to see the plane whizzing past buildings ummm try recording the buildings. This was the second plane ummmm they have things called tripods, look it up there was time.
So I still would like to know how they faked these planes hitting the buildings to all the eyewitnesses on the streets that day. Or are all the people of NY part of the conspiracy???
@razorfett147 Odd question. Do you ask people who did not see a movie what they saw?
The faked video has nothing to do with what eyewitnesses may or may not have seen. I know that anyone (including cops and firemen) who was in the wtc area saw and heard the explosions going off all day and saw the grey/whitish wispy smoke of the demo charges in the towers (visible in some videos). However, I only work with the video and some images that are officially presented, not as an eyewitness.
@CNN911Fakes once again you try to make something out of nothing.... and you do not understand a thing of Newtons laws of motion. you reach so far to grasp at something that you make a fool of yourself. if you are filming a plane, the scenery has an apparent motion in the frame... film the building and the plane goes merrily on its way... i cant believe anyone would buy your tripe.
@nameofthepen where does he say anything that comes close to describing newtons 3rd. law. what do you think was meant by locked 20 exchange is to the foreground building 30 old slip? and what showed this?
@nameofthepen ive decided to use your tactic....and answer a question with a question... i said in my video exactly what newtons 3rd law says. c9n dude only said that a closing rate of speed would be the same if one object moved both moved.
@nameofthepen i didnt quote it .... but what he said has nothing to do with newtons third law.... sorry you cant understand that. this video had nothing reacting with anything... all he said was about speed and ridiculously at that... wow, i mean throw a rock at a stopped car at 60 mph... or... have a car hit a rock at 60 mph... or.. throw a rock at a car at 30 mph and the car is coming at you at 30 mph... the car and rock will have contact with each other in the same time period.
@nameofthepen where does he say anything that comes close to describing newtons 3rd. law. what do you think was meant by locked 20 exchange is to the foreground building 30 old slip? and what showed this?
@razorfett147 you will never get an answer. you will need the witnesses names and address, a notorized copy of their statement that they have never worked for the government or the news media. The disclaimer must further state that they do not know anyone in the government or news media or have never interacted with the government or news media..... or have never read, listened to or watched the news media.
@jaxplane - Oh, now you're just being petulant. We have accepted the statements of several people "in...the news media" who were right there on the scene, and didn't see a plane hit either tower. :-)
@nameofthepen if i were you, i would not accept those news media statements, they obviously are hiding something, lol you "accept" statements that didnt see planes hitting and reject statemments that do see the planes... how convenient for you and btw...."to hell with objectivity"... oh and i didnt personally see the planes hit the towers either... so i guess im now agreeing with the no planes thingy?
@nameofthepen no hostility, but i ridicule the ridiculous.. news bad, news good whenever it suits you. tiny mistakes are big coverups... "about" is not allowed by the bbc because it is a key phrase.
@jaxplane sez: " 'about' is not allowed by the bbc...". No, Jack, that's another video. I asked you 2 simple questions. Why won't you answer them, instead of spamming the board?
@nameofthepen asked and answered at least a couple of times. of course you prefer not to answer those because you simply cant...... soooooo.. lets say jack is spamming... you want any more answers. ask them on my video.... i dont really like using this tactic but i learned it from your buddy and you... all answers are there.
@nameofthepen have i not answered them here? havent i asked questions of you here? have you answered any of my questions?? as usual you dont want the truth, you try to maintain a position is all and looking ridiculous in the process... if you looked for the truth you would find it in my video but as you stated. nope you aint gonna do it. Thats alled "avoiding" the truth. "911 TRUTHERS" OMG, how funny is that?? so the truth is contained in this video here?? no where else? yep figured as much.
@jaxplane Let's say you successfully debunked the facts expressed in this video, rather than objecting to the presentation and title, there are still 254 other videos proving the official story a lie
All I need is for one of my videos to be right and I have succeeded in proving the official lie to be a lie. Isn't that cool? You need to 255 videos (actually based on the 3 so far, 258) to prove my videos have errors. That's a hill too high for you; you'll never do it. But, I applaud your effort
@CNN911Fakes yeah you are just like a terrorist, all you have to do is be successful once. Oh, i dont plan on comming close to all your videos. I just stick to laws of physics and other ridiculous things that Nom or others point out to me like BBC time lines Jennings saying Cheney is in sarasota on 911... i wont go near your claimed animations and gorillas in the smoke and dogs in the barkless part of a tree...thats just imagination gone amuck.
@jaxplane Under the laws of oppression, exposure of the crimes of the people in government is classified as terrorism and, since I am American, that makes me "home grown"
Seems you finally got something right.
My worst videos are more than you can sucessfully debunk (as shown by your efforts so far). My best ones could be used to indict if we had a cirminal system that was based on justice.
You are welcome to demonstrate that I altered any original material to disguise the truth.
@CNN911Fakes you have no sense of humor. I was bouncing off of Homeland Security as they are always saying they have to right 100% of the time while terrorists have to be successful just once. You prove nothing in your videos but you make claims galore.. like cheney in sarasota lol... thing are always so blurry but you think by saying this is cheney, it makes it so. you make statements you can never prove, ever! but you hope some weakminded soul might believe you.
@jaxplane Take the cheney discussion to a cheney video and expose your objections to that community. Better yet, make that your next video project.
My facts, from which I draw my inferences, are all available for all to examine and criticize. I have no problem with those who draw different inferences/conclusions. I have a problem with people who merely make noise and wish to insinuate there are problems with the facts.
Only prisons are completely secure. I won't live in one.
@CNN911Fakes you state your conclusions as facts which is quite different from the fact. im not playing this game of your. im not gonna waste time trying to find a video so i can make a comment where you think is appropriate.... the only truth to you BBC timeline was nisha said about a half hour... and you didnt like it because it was essential because it was a buzz word or key phrase.... you distort, twist, imagine things and try to pawn them off on the unsuspecting as truth, shame on you
@jaxplane you seem to have ignored my agreement with you that we should not accept anything said by rumsfled, cheney and bush since they are proven liars.
Also, there are now 2 videos dealing directly with the cock up Nisha Pillai, the more recent shows CNN screwing up London Time. I guess that is why you are avoiding it. But, that's OK. Take that discussion there.
YT search "cheney sarasota whitehouse" and the odds are you will find my videos showing the Jennings segment. YOu are welcome.
@CNN911Fakes i have no agreement with you regarding anything and certainly not about rumsfeld, cheney or bush. your imagination runs rampant once again. i saw your cheney sarasota video.... again zooming in on someone and claim its cheney is the one thing you do and you do it predictably and repeatedly. if you want me to comment on the cnn london time thingy... give me url... i dont have time to search for it, god only knows what you titled it.... btw... you explain nothing about newton 3rd law
@CNN911Fakes you dont seem to know anything about the justice system either. I witness who is caught in a lie or is unaccurate, all of the testimony is tainted and their credibility hightly dimenished. Expecting to have anyone believe a blurry picture enough to indict makes me laugh ha ha. try you BBC timeline or cheney in florida crap in a court..so you can immediately uninflate your totally flawed view of yourself. I hereby challenge you to PROVE anything you claim, contrary to the facts.
@CNN911Fakes excuse me, shouldnt this be over at your cheney video? or its ok for you but not for mel?? I could have a hundred videos where cheney told the truth and it would not matter to you. You would just say nah uh... and you know it. do you have any proof those caves didnt exist? a good size blockbuster bomb seals the cave off pretty darned good. i can hear you now NAH UH....when will you finally understand that because you imagine or disagree with something that its not true....
"witness who is caught in a lie or is unaccurate, all of the testimony is tainted and their credibility hightly dimenished."
and now he is claiming the opposite. He also wishes to claim facts don't begin with observation; one cave - the CNN jerk off reporter used by Bill Cooper RIP.
By the way, produce 3 videos where rumsfled told a demonstrable truth 911 or later. Put your money where your mouth is.
I proved that ashcroft told the truth - once; that's all.
@CNN911Fakes who is claiming the opposite? and of what? if i did run across a video of rumsfeld telling the truth you would only deny it. The only money i put up is 100 bucks to Nom if he could show me where jennings said cheney was in sarasota.... jennings did not say that on your video, period...he may have positively IDd him from the blurry video, where i could not or would not identify anyone but jennings didnt say it... you might have proved ashcroft told the truth once from 1000s.. so?
@jaxplane - I don't remember claiming Peter Jennings said that on one of C9F's vids. But you win by default, because where he DID say it has been wiped from the net, in true Orwellian style.
Here he is in the foreground of a "live" shot of AF1, in Sarasota, the morning of 911. It's a very good quality copy: /watch?v=xYc-8R47LxI
Here, C-SPAN live: "VP Dick Cheney *also* coming back to Washington..." /watch?v=zqzsEs-K_3Q
So! Put them together and what have you got? Bibbidi-Bobbidi-Boo!
@nameofthepen both sarasota videos you gave me. those are what i watched. would you identify cheney in the video if something bad would happen if you were wrong? i dont think you would but it makes for a good story.and now we went over the cnn due "abouting" all over the place remember? but all you see or hear is in the last few seconds the mininformed cspan reporter off handedly saying that cheney would be returning to washington.. he had no idea where cheney was it was his filler
@jaxplane - Hey! Maybe that was the "anti-matter Cheney"! You know...the "shadow government" one. And, he always has to be kept pretty far away from the "pro-matter Cheney", to prevent triggering an accidental, world-destroying explosion!
@nameofthepen I would prefer the cheney discussion to be on the cheney video, but, in order for that not to be cheney, one has to assume that "they" would permit a person not boarding the plane to walk around giving orders to reporters boarding the plane and military folks inspecting the carry ons. I determined that was cheney over 2 years ago on a really bad resolution copy. The resolution on this one is good enough.
@nameofthepen Nom, sorry i could dont identify him and if you can positively id him. i have nothing more to say. you see it and i dont... but you also see a gorilla in the smoke. not that it matters because nothing does... its against protocol for pres and vice pres to travel together.... do you really think the vice president of the united states would help load a plane???? talk about a sheesh....
@nameofthepen omg... whatever supervise loading a plane, he would have helped the loading of the plane. knowing a little about the military, it was probably a field grade officer or team leader of secret service.. but as you wish our vice pres needs to surpervise the plane loading ... yep sure... you tell me i misquote but wont say where you wont tell me how newtons thirt law applied to the video.... you all never answer a question you will try to redirect to a different topic... its transparent
@jaxplane - Jack, why do you make these inaccurate "quotes" of what other people say?
I watched your video where you misquoted CNN911Fakes. I even left a comment, remember? Meanwhile, again, for the record: "I asked you two simple questions. Why won't you answer them?"
@nameofthepen what was my inaccurate quote? ive told you three perhaps four times now you question has been asked and answered. i have many questions just today which you ignore totally.... im not wasting my time showing you the answer.... you dont seek the truth you dont even go to my video for another complete answer... its obvious now that truth matters not to you'all it digging in over a position.
@CNN911Fakes i havent the slightest wish to have a following. i do it mostly as a video response to your outlandish claims and suppositions and imagination.
@jaxplane Well, then you should do a better job. For an example of a shill video that does a pretty good job, watch aliententity's effort; it's on my playlist. He actually put a HQ (mpeg) copy on to the internet archive
The planted tires really enrage him. And, of course, I am blocked there
You are a distraction; you have neither the knowlege nor skill to begin finding errors in my videos and, you are gutless - you won't make your comments where they belong
@CNN911Fakes gutless, lol... i have found errors in your videos... i have more than enough knowledge and it requires no skill just observation, you just wont admit to them, the problem is you think you are smart and everyone else is an idiot, now you seem to have a set of rules and i dont follow YOUR rules and im far from gutless and am not a sheeple sorry. my challenge stands but you wont be man enough to accept it. i am your worst nightmare and you know it. truth is what i represent you fearit
@jaxplane I was going to ignore you; beddie by beckons, but...
You say you are my worst nightmare. Nah. You are a total amateur. Do some research on poetryhound - a true professional shill, seamless user of disinformation rules, seldom made an error. Apparently, when I died, lots of shills lost their jobs and, since I turned out to be alive, the pros won't come near me.
I may not be particularly smart (I do answer your noise proving ignorance), but I am the best researcher on YT. The best.
@CNN911Fakes Well arent you the cutest lil thang, all wrapped up in his self, awwww ))))) im certainly not going to research someone else. you are all i need. you have only answered one question of mine and... thats nisha using " about" everything was correct in the timeline but you conclude that even everyting was correct except their decision to use the word "about" her about was off by 15 minutes, wow. The video showed nothing wrong. Noms answer was that she thought it was 10 lol yup he said
@jaxplane - Jack, I also become exasperated with C9F's obscure private jokes, and his vids are always difficult for me. I must study them. It's work! :-P
I asked you 2 questions. I wish you had tried finding the answers. If you had, and had read up on things like "parallax scrolling", "multiplane camera", "zoom lens photography", etc., like I had to (for hours), you'd know exactly what the title meant (which is very funny, now that I finally get the joke).
@nameofthepen please please explane to me how "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" has to do with zooming or anything else... perhaps if he had said that if might have made better sense but not a thing he said in the video dealt with forces only apparent motion, which was quite correct...i honestly think you asked him about it and he hit you with the mumbo jumbo crap to get out of his error... you can of course believe him all you want.
@jaxplane - Jack, you now think I'm a liar? Since we've "known" each other for over 6 years now, and I've never given you reason to say that, that reflects more poorly upon your character than mine.
And, nope, this time, I didn't have to be tutored. As I said before, I spent hours finding out just WTF his obscure references to buildings locked together, zoom photography, and camera in a globe, etc., might mean. And then, voilà! The joke about "buildings hitting planes" became clear.
@nameofthepen when did i call you a liar. i said i think you asked him and he told you... nothing about you not taking from there.... but you refuse to answer my question... what does newtons third law have to do with this video? you can avoid it but it doesnt go away... if he wanted to talk about parallax scrolling and mulitframe cameras, he should have done that... im sure todays animators are much more sophisticated than to create this time of cartoon video... third law please tell me
@jaxplane -Jack, this is getting boring. Yeah, you DID call me a liar. Let me refresh you:
Me: “If you..had read up on things like "parallax scrolling", "multiplane camera", "zoom lens photography", etc., like I had to (for hours), you'd know...”
You: “i honestly think you asked him about it and he hit you with the mumbo jumbo crap to get out of his error...”
OK I will ask you the same thing I ask all you loser conspiracy nut jobs. If the plane crashes were faked, how the hell do you explain the thousands of New Yorkers that watched it happen from the streets? You cant, because your full of shit, the planes hit, get over it.
@pitt15220 You know, I rewatched the video and, it shows a faked video of a plane flying across NY and crashing into a tower on 911. It does not raise the issue of lying and fooled witnesses at all. You are welcome to prove this video makes a mistrake so you can feel more confident in your ignorance, but, you know, no one has in several years.
My most recent upload is a witness video; feel free to discuss those 2 witnesses there.
Be as vulgar as you need to be to express your science.
@CNN911Fakes Still didnt answer my question....how did they trick the people on the streets that watched it happen. its a simple question. How does it not raise the question of fooled witnesses when they saw it happen? you make no sense to me.
@pitt15220 I make no sense to you because you wish to discuss an issue not in contention on this video and I won't. There are lots of videos dealing with witnesses, choose one. If you choose one of mine and you ask a question related to the video, I will do my best to answer.
@CNN911Fakes Not really sure how this sin't related to your video, since in the description you mention TV fakery. I would think that my question about how the witnesses on the streets were "tricked", it seems directly related. No Im not just trolling, I have asked that question many, many times, and never get an actual answer. I can add you to the list of people who can't answer, they just get mad and try to change the subject.
@pitt15220 Well thanks for visiting and commenting again.
Yeh, Joe Craine videos fall under the general category of TV fakery and each video contributes its own little bit to proving that. But, the general category of TV fakery is not within the domain of each video, only its narrow field. this video deals with the impossible tracking of a hand held camera, that's it.
You may say whatever you want here, but, the only thing that draws my attention is finding errors in the facts presented.
@pitt15220 lol, exactly right. it he is at a total loss of any answer at all, the the question does not fall into the specifics of the video, however, if he thinks he has a lame answer he will refer to other videos to try an bolster his non existant point.
@CNN911Fakes I'm not going to find another one of your videos that you find acceptable for me to ask that question. I did find a few videos where someone will say something like they didnt see the second plane hit, but never found one where they come right out and say that there was no plane. So if you cant explain your thought process on this, then I will keep trying to find someone that doesnt just choose to not believe they hit without even knowing why they think that.
@pitt15220 I gave you an acceptable video; 2 professionals. I can assure you there are no records of anyone saying there were no tigers, elephants or mammoths either, that doesn't mean there were any.
There is a scientific principle; you don't make a hypothesis about someting you have not observed. There is no evidence that planes hit anything on 911, reasonable evidence that no planes crashed on 911 and overwhelming evidence that evidence was faked to make it look like planes crashed.
@CNN911Fakes OK, you say there is no evidence that planes hit anything on 9-11. That statement is directly related to my question that you refuse to answer, or change the direction of the conversation. You are reacting the exact same way every other conspiracy theorist did when I asked the same question. I believe I also predicted that is the way you would reply. How can you say there isn't any evidence, you won't even answer the question, as if you believe the streets were completely empty?
@pitt15220 This is not a general information site. You have a general question, find an appropriate place to air/ask it. Not here.
You seem to have taken a survey of some sort, that's good, why not publish the results somewhere people can react and criticize it? You seem to take umbrage with the fact that I insist that I will only answer questions directly related to this video.
You also seem incapable of moving your discussion to a video where your questions are covered.
@CNN911Fakes There is no format to this site at all, and I'm not taking a survey. I'm asking a simple question, the same one I have been asking, because I would like an answer. You, like all the others I tried to get an answer from, just dodge the question. I am fully capable of moving on, but I am amazed at the effort you put forth in avoiding any kind of answer to the question. I wonder why? For the record, I did ask this on another video, but I really wonder why your dodging the question...
@TylerDurdenMakesSoap Finally someone with a brain. The massive core is never mentioned in the pancake theory. I have used this visual; to no avail.
The floors of the WTC would be similar to donuts falling down a 1" dowel rod. My question has always been what's causing the dowel rod to collapse and even further, what caused it to collapse at the same rate that a rock falls through unobstructed air? Planted explosives anyone? Demolition anyone?
Hey man you should post a video that goes something like this..
"Watch as a complete moron uploads ridiculous stupid 911 No Plane videos with dumb ass Walt Disney titling and tries to shove more nonsense down our throats"
Joe Craine gets his advice from a lot of different sources. He alsways appreciates a fresh point of view.
Your delusion that I control who watches my videos is amusing; I am the only person obliged to watch them, the 3.5 millin other views have all been voluntary.
If you ever venture further than your own banality, stop by my channel to find out more about the disney font.
@roquefortfiles To prepare yourself to prove me wrong on every front. To demonstrate your superior research skills. To show the world that America loves being enslaved to foreign masters and you intend to beat the odds.
To show that no amount of factual content can change your mind from blindly following your masters.
oh wasnt any planes huh. i guess the 2+ million new yorkers made it all up too for the sake of some crude oil huh. dont be an idiot. wake up people this really happened.
yo when you make videos next time take them with proper fonts as the font you have been useing is gay and also your choice in colures is shit aswell scrub
TheCrimsonsCult (7 minutes ago) My ONLY and SOLE purpose for being here on YoUTube is~~~~>
ENTERTAINMENT!
From DAY ONE... AKA The Crimsonskull
TheCrimsonsCult (2 minutes ago) Show Hide 0 Marked as spam
Reply | Spam
HAHA,, I get some good jollies off here every now and then,, I go to sleep laughing and giggling sometimes it's so funny what ENTERTAINMENT I've gathered from my experiences here.
Hey CNN911Fakes, have you ever heard of a tripod? Yeah, people are using them nowadays to hold their cameras steady and in place while filming stuff like this. You can pan real smoothly. Seriously, they're called tripods, & you can get one at Wal Mart.
And in that bit about Newton's 3rd law... Are you suggesting that someone was moving Manhattan toward the plane at 500 mph? Cause really it's easier too move the plane that fast.
So all the thousands and thousands of tv channels who aired this were playing a joke on us. Yeah right. I believe what I saw that day. I saw people dying. And that's horrible enough.
think how could bush get the nations support to attack iraq for oil because saddam hussein was doing oil business in DOLLARS but changed to EUROS so american economy was dropping dramatically,, so bush did this to create fear scare people to do that was to kill some of his own american citizens, thats what he did and every1 jumped on his band wagon of pack of lies,,
If the U.S. government is behind Sept 11th (& I'm not saying they're not), surely there was no reason to cover up missiles hitting the WTC with images of planes.
They could have just said that Al Qaeda used missiles, thus negating the need to even create a cover story of planes hitting the WTC.
Instead we have this far-fetched theory that ALL the TV networks and amateur footage was faked.
Ask all the people on the ground in NY that day. Are you telling me not one of them saw a plane?
your stupidity is immense. americans deserve our sympathy but actually we are just stunned by your ludicrous obsession with conspiracy theories. of course we shouldnt believe all we see, but if you really believe GWB has the brains to or desire to pull this off... then you are dumber than he is... and he is fukn dumb
To add, while I believe in the notion that the public has been misled about 9/11, I must say that this video does not demonstrate Newton's 3rd law. It appears to be suggesting that something is wrong with the frame of the building on fire. So are they saying that a plane hitting a building should bounce off? or what
Maybe you are saying the plane should splat and the building should be left with only a scratch?
When the windows in the building shatter and the airplane's sheet metal skin and thousands of parts are disconnected and bent beyond recognition, I cannot imagine what prevents most of the airplane's mass from entering the building.
I agree with you that there is a lot of Disneyfication on TV and the public is largely misled about 9/11.
@CNN911Fakes The same way an egg bounces off a bat??? Are you fucking joking me? The WTC was 90% air. Besides the steel shell it is basically open space. To say that the plane should have splattered on the outside of the building does not demonstrate science at all, All it demonstrates is how fucked up in the head you really are.
Being a physics student I had to pause this at 30 seconds in.
The video claims you add the objects' velocities and it is the same any way you look at it, but in actuality, you must multiply the velocity and mass of the objects to get their momentums. Momentum is conserved in collisions and explosions. Velocity is only conserved in collisions and explosions between objects of equal mass.
Exonmorhp911 is cackpot he blocked me to. His goal is sway voting stooges. Agenda with a paycheck i bet. Im sure big media fakes are payin him. wont even dicuss flight 800. Now there is a cover up if i ever seen one.
City firemans motto-never trust a truss built high rise fire. The towers had truss supported floors. But they were coated to prevent any fire-heat failure.The coat was blown and or shredded off by crash=crashes. The molten steel some have spoke of was really molshiny molten liquid aluminum mostly from plane. Molten means liquid-steel glows red,and you dont need science charts to explain that unless you deal with some kind crazyman. You iether get it or you dont-stupid or not stupid.Plain simple
I do apolagise for allowing this to bring out the worst in me but all those people who lost thier lives and families losses. It just makes me want counter thier evil ignorant rants. God Bless you all, and may he forgive.
Pls provide the YT watch= code for the video where you tell us how to obtain the highest quality non-compressed copy. I don't wish to search the internet or even your videos to find the one youe wish us to use.
Oh, and for the record. MPEG does not compress (unless told to); it removes redundancies, exact redundancies, preserving the integrity of the original.
That's why DVD's use Mpeg (although a better one is being developed)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Sighface, another stupid video about how it weren't planes that went into the buildings, I'm waiting for someone to make a video about saying the buildings are stills standing, it was just a big world hoax.
Yes, but how many of them have the fire had 100s of ton of weight ontop of it, the steel will weaken and soften, due to the fire, and the 100s of ton will weigh it down..
But, there was even MORE mass holding the top UP! There were 4 walls of steel, American steel -- steel that won the war! -- AND an innercore of 47-massive steel H-beams with extra cross-bracing and so forth; and it all came together in the Hat Truss.
No; that building wasn't in any danger from a fire. It was brought down by other means.
And recall that in 1974 there was a fire in WTC1 that burned for many hours! And the building held up!
They're compression artifacts, my avi was in high quality with barely any, the mpg2 had NONE, you've made it worse by compressing it a second time, then again by youtube's compression. Pixel bleed is a totally bogus claim, especially dealing with a video upload alterred by youtube's flash video compression.
I used the file you uploaded without adjustment. It is your file. The frames are identified. Pull the frame you don't like, blow it up and show us what you mean.
Yeah, try the source at the secondary link. I provided 2 downloads, because youtube doesn't like DVD mpg2's nor widescreen either, the reason I cropped the mpg2 to avi.
It's all right there in my video info, see "New York: A documentary: Episode 8: Center of the World" or see "CNN: America Remembers" for high quality versions without any compression artifacts.
This has been flagged as spam show
So you want video proof from others to show a horse finishing in 2nd was actually first, but you can't show us a video proof of recreating a fake plane? Sounds unfair and evasive to me.
PenthouseDiaries 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
PenthouseDiaries 3 weeks ago
@CNN911Fakes Yes you need to because that is your proof. Anything that you claim must be able to be recreated.
PenthouseDiaries 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Attention Please: I want you all to realize this guy is pulling your legs and is not serious. Who in their right mind would try to claim this fantastic cover-up with Disney Font?
PenthouseDiaries 3 weeks ago
I'll understand this video when I can read the words.
fustraton 4 months ago
Im a videographer and I said that this movement is possible. Is just practice.
CarlosBcn1989 4 months ago
@CarlosBcn1989 YOu are welcome to direct us to an example or to create/find one and upload it as a response.
CNN911Fakes 4 months ago
@CNN911Fakes Its simply a pano to right. In a distance and doing a general shot, you have time to correct the pano. And it seems a big shot zoomed. Now look at you, you are trying to show us tv manipulation but i dont know wich is your intention if that plane really crash to the tower. I cant understand what are your objectives with all this videos.
CarlosBcn1989 4 months ago
@CarlosBcn1989 That's why I wrote on my channel.
CNN911Fakes 4 months ago
you need to learn physics man what you said is wrong
DBMHTECH 5 months ago
Comment removed
DBMHTECH 5 months ago
No 911 truther worth their salt thinks there were no planes! Your disinfo mate pure and simple.
annuity100 6 months ago
@annuity100 So, the reason they needed to prepare faked videos and the reason no one has been apprehended for that?
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
all this shows is a stationary camera tracking a moving object through a built up area!..how the hell can you come to the conclusion that you have!!..you are getting worse and worse mate!..as much as i love messaging you to tell you how inept you are at this investigation stuff, i cant help but laugh at what you consider to be evidence!.....please show me somehting that you have posted that is somewhat suspicious or has an element of doubt and fact about it!
MrCharlie06 6 months ago
@MrCharlie06 My channel feature video.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes - As I mentioned to Jack, I finally got the finely-wrought play on words in the title. But, of course it doesn't really show Newton's 3rd, since there's no equal reaction upon the fake plane.
Now, OTOH, here is an cool example of Newton's 3rd on a real plane: /watch?v=Zl0MhOdkREQ
Good night. Sleep well. :-)
nameofthepen 6 months ago
Reading these comments gives me some clue of what it must be like to be a kindergarten teacher locked up all day with 5-year-olds.
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen But, unlike the teacher, I don't take them to the bathroom and I don't have to clean up when I don't. I have the ultimate power; to ignore as their bowels explode!
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes - LOL! :D
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes and after their bowels have exploded, you will more substance for more of your videos.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane Thanks for showing up. You are right, the official story is nothing other than a lot of shit. I see you have honered me with another video, I look forward to seeing it and adding it to the detractor playlist.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes you say detractor, i say debunker )). I too sir are glad and honored to be on your list. Now if you would be so kind to explain to me any thing that had to do with newton's third law. You try to make some inane point about the buildings whizzing past the plane, this is expected when recording the plane. If you want to see the plane whizzing past buildings ummm try recording the buildings. This was the second plane ummmm they have things called tripods, look it up there was time.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@nameofthepen exactly right, sometimes i can barely make it through the day, so please stop it.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - why reply to a comment not directed at you, and ignore one which was?
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen did i break a rule? am i not allowed to make comments and to which comment do you refer so i can more correctly address this "issue"
jaxplane 6 months ago
So I still would like to know how they faked these planes hitting the buildings to all the eyewitnesses on the streets that day. Or are all the people of NY part of the conspiracy???
razorfett147 6 months ago
@razorfett147 Odd question. Do you ask people who did not see a movie what they saw?
The faked video has nothing to do with what eyewitnesses may or may not have seen. I know that anyone (including cops and firemen) who was in the wtc area saw and heard the explosions going off all day and saw the grey/whitish wispy smoke of the demo charges in the towers (visible in some videos). However, I only work with the video and some images that are officially presented, not as an eyewitness.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes once again you try to make something out of nothing.... and you do not understand a thing of Newtons laws of motion. you reach so far to grasp at something that you make a fool of yourself. if you are filming a plane, the scenery has an apparent motion in the frame... film the building and the plane goes merrily on its way... i cant believe anyone would buy your tripe.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane Thanks for stopping by and commenting. I wait for your next video covering the subject.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@jaxplane - 1. What exactly did you think was meant by "observe how well locked 20 Exchange is to the foreground building 30 Old Slip"?
2. You say that C9F does "...not understand...Newtons laws...". What issue do you have with his simplified description of Law #3?
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen where does he say anything that comes close to describing newtons 3rd. law. what do you think was meant by locked 20 exchange is to the foreground building 30 old slip? and what showed this?
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - Ha ha...cute. I asked you first. I guess you don't have answers.
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen ive decided to use your tactic....and answer a question with a question... i said in my video exactly what newtons 3rd law says. c9n dude only said that a closing rate of speed would be the same if one object moved both moved.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - er...that's not exactly what C9F said, Jack. Again, you've pre-rejected certain incoming communication, and consequently, didn't duplicate it accurately.
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen i didnt quote it .... but what he said has nothing to do with newtons third law.... sorry you cant understand that. this video had nothing reacting with anything... all he said was about speed and ridiculously at that... wow, i mean throw a rock at a stopped car at 60 mph... or... have a car hit a rock at 60 mph... or.. throw a rock at a car at 30 mph and the car is coming at you at 30 mph... the car and rock will have contact with each other in the same time period.
jaxplane 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nameofthepen where does he say anything that comes close to describing newtons 3rd. law. what do you think was meant by locked 20 exchange is to the foreground building 30 old slip? and what showed this?
jaxplane 6 months ago
@razorfett147 you will never get an answer. you will need the witnesses names and address, a notorized copy of their statement that they have never worked for the government or the news media. The disclaimer must further state that they do not know anyone in the government or news media or have never interacted with the government or news media..... or have never read, listened to or watched the news media.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - Oh, now you're just being petulant. We have accepted the statements of several people "in...the news media" who were right there on the scene, and didn't see a plane hit either tower. :-)
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen if i were you, i would not accept those news media statements, they obviously are hiding something, lol you "accept" statements that didnt see planes hitting and reject statemments that do see the planes... how convenient for you and btw...."to hell with objectivity"... oh and i didnt personally see the planes hit the towers either... so i guess im now agreeing with the no planes thingy?
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - hostility, sarcasm and ridicule are not answers to questions.
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen no hostility, but i ridicule the ridiculous.. news bad, news good whenever it suits you. tiny mistakes are big coverups... "about" is not allowed by the bbc because it is a key phrase.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane sez: " 'about' is not allowed by the bbc...". No, Jack, that's another video. I asked you 2 simple questions. Why won't you answer them, instead of spamming the board?
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen asked and answered at least a couple of times. of course you prefer not to answer those because you simply cant...... soooooo.. lets say jack is spamming... you want any more answers. ask them on my video.... i dont really like using this tactic but i learned it from your buddy and you... all answers are there.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - OK. Well, not interested. This is where they were asked, and avoided.
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen have i not answered them here? havent i asked questions of you here? have you answered any of my questions?? as usual you dont want the truth, you try to maintain a position is all and looking ridiculous in the process... if you looked for the truth you would find it in my video but as you stated. nope you aint gonna do it. Thats alled "avoiding" the truth. "911 TRUTHERS" OMG, how funny is that?? so the truth is contained in this video here?? no where else? yep figured as much.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane Let's say you successfully debunked the facts expressed in this video, rather than objecting to the presentation and title, there are still 254 other videos proving the official story a lie
All I need is for one of my videos to be right and I have succeeded in proving the official lie to be a lie. Isn't that cool? You need to 255 videos (actually based on the 3 so far, 258) to prove my videos have errors. That's a hill too high for you; you'll never do it. But, I applaud your effort
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes yeah you are just like a terrorist, all you have to do is be successful once. Oh, i dont plan on comming close to all your videos. I just stick to laws of physics and other ridiculous things that Nom or others point out to me like BBC time lines Jennings saying Cheney is in sarasota on 911... i wont go near your claimed animations and gorillas in the smoke and dogs in the barkless part of a tree...thats just imagination gone amuck.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane Under the laws of oppression, exposure of the crimes of the people in government is classified as terrorism and, since I am American, that makes me "home grown"
Seems you finally got something right.
My worst videos are more than you can sucessfully debunk (as shown by your efforts so far). My best ones could be used to indict if we had a cirminal system that was based on justice.
You are welcome to demonstrate that I altered any original material to disguise the truth.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes you have no sense of humor. I was bouncing off of Homeland Security as they are always saying they have to right 100% of the time while terrorists have to be successful just once. You prove nothing in your videos but you make claims galore.. like cheney in sarasota lol... thing are always so blurry but you think by saying this is cheney, it makes it so. you make statements you can never prove, ever! but you hope some weakminded soul might believe you.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane Take the cheney discussion to a cheney video and expose your objections to that community. Better yet, make that your next video project.
My facts, from which I draw my inferences, are all available for all to examine and criticize. I have no problem with those who draw different inferences/conclusions. I have a problem with people who merely make noise and wish to insinuate there are problems with the facts.
Only prisons are completely secure. I won't live in one.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes you state your conclusions as facts which is quite different from the fact. im not playing this game of your. im not gonna waste time trying to find a video so i can make a comment where you think is appropriate.... the only truth to you BBC timeline was nisha said about a half hour... and you didnt like it because it was essential because it was a buzz word or key phrase.... you distort, twist, imagine things and try to pawn them off on the unsuspecting as truth, shame on you
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane you seem to have ignored my agreement with you that we should not accept anything said by rumsfled, cheney and bush since they are proven liars.
Also, there are now 2 videos dealing directly with the cock up Nisha Pillai, the more recent shows CNN screwing up London Time. I guess that is why you are avoiding it. But, that's OK. Take that discussion there.
YT search "cheney sarasota whitehouse" and the odds are you will find my videos showing the Jennings segment. YOu are welcome.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes i have no agreement with you regarding anything and certainly not about rumsfeld, cheney or bush. your imagination runs rampant once again. i saw your cheney sarasota video.... again zooming in on someone and claim its cheney is the one thing you do and you do it predictably and repeatedly. if you want me to comment on the cnn london time thingy... give me url... i dont have time to search for it, god only knows what you titled it.... btw... you explain nothing about newton 3rd law
jaxplane 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes you dont seem to know anything about the justice system either. I witness who is caught in a lie or is unaccurate, all of the testimony is tainted and their credibility hightly dimenished. Expecting to have anyone believe a blurry picture enough to indict makes me laugh ha ha. try you BBC timeline or cheney in florida crap in a court..so you can immediately uninflate your totally flawed view of yourself. I hereby challenge you to PROVE anything you claim, contrary to the facts.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane said a
"witness who is caught in a lie or is unaccurate, all of the testimony is tainted and their credibility hightly dimenished."
You mean like
-rumsfeld's claim about OBL's terrorism cities in caves with Tim Russert testimony (see my last video if you misssed it)
-have you got an example where cheney ever told the truth?
-bush told the truth once "pictures of planes crashing into buildings" and he threatened us with "I will be returning to washington" and he did.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes excuse me, shouldnt this be over at your cheney video? or its ok for you but not for mel?? I could have a hundred videos where cheney told the truth and it would not matter to you. You would just say nah uh... and you know it. do you have any proof those caves didnt exist? a good size blockbuster bomb seals the cave off pretty darned good. i can hear you now NAH UH....when will you finally understand that because you imagine or disagree with something that its not true....
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane said a
"witness who is caught in a lie or is unaccurate, all of the testimony is tainted and their credibility hightly dimenished."
and now he is claiming the opposite. He also wishes to claim facts don't begin with observation; one cave - the CNN jerk off reporter used by Bill Cooper RIP.
By the way, produce 3 videos where rumsfled told a demonstrable truth 911 or later. Put your money where your mouth is.
I proved that ashcroft told the truth - once; that's all.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes who is claiming the opposite? and of what? if i did run across a video of rumsfeld telling the truth you would only deny it. The only money i put up is 100 bucks to Nom if he could show me where jennings said cheney was in sarasota.... jennings did not say that on your video, period...he may have positively IDd him from the blurry video, where i could not or would not identify anyone but jennings didnt say it... you might have proved ashcroft told the truth once from 1000s.. so?
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - I don't remember claiming Peter Jennings said that on one of C9F's vids. But you win by default, because where he DID say it has been wiped from the net, in true Orwellian style.
Here he is in the foreground of a "live" shot of AF1, in Sarasota, the morning of 911. It's a very good quality copy: /watch?v=xYc-8R47LxI
Here, C-SPAN live: "VP Dick Cheney *also* coming back to Washington..." /watch?v=zqzsEs-K_3Q
So! Put them together and what have you got? Bibbidi-Bobbidi-Boo!
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen both sarasota videos you gave me. those are what i watched. would you identify cheney in the video if something bad would happen if you were wrong? i dont think you would but it makes for a good story.and now we went over the cnn due "abouting" all over the place remember? but all you see or hear is in the last few seconds the mininformed cspan reporter off handedly saying that cheney would be returning to washington.. he had no idea where cheney was it was his filler
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - Hey! Maybe that was the "anti-matter Cheney"! You know...the "shadow government" one. And, he always has to be kept pretty far away from the "pro-matter Cheney", to prevent triggering an accidental, world-destroying explosion!
C'mon Jack. Geeeez. :D
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen I would prefer the cheney discussion to be on the cheney video, but, in order for that not to be cheney, one has to assume that "they" would permit a person not boarding the plane to walk around giving orders to reporters boarding the plane and military folks inspecting the carry ons. I determined that was cheney over 2 years ago on a really bad resolution copy. The resolution on this one is good enough.
That is cheney and bush is not on that plane
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@nameofthepen Nom, sorry i could dont identify him and if you can positively id him. i have nothing more to say. you see it and i dont... but you also see a gorilla in the smoke. not that it matters because nothing does... its against protocol for pres and vice pres to travel together.... do you really think the vice president of the united states would help load a plane???? talk about a sheesh....
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - "help load a plane?" I didn't see him holding a bag. Did you? :D
Yes, I see a gorilla in the "smoke" on CNN911Fakes' channel background. And you don't? :D
Goodnight, Jack. It's been...an experience. :-)
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen omg... whatever supervise loading a plane, he would have helped the loading of the plane. knowing a little about the military, it was probably a field grade officer or team leader of secret service.. but as you wish our vice pres needs to surpervise the plane loading ... yep sure... you tell me i misquote but wont say where you wont tell me how newtons thirt law applied to the video.... you all never answer a question you will try to redirect to a different topic... its transparent
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - Jack, why do you make these inaccurate "quotes" of what other people say?
I watched your video where you misquoted CNN911Fakes. I even left a comment, remember? Meanwhile, again, for the record: "I asked you two simple questions. Why won't you answer them?"
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen what was my inaccurate quote? ive told you three perhaps four times now you question has been asked and answered. i have many questions just today which you ignore totally.... im not wasting my time showing you the answer.... you dont seek the truth you dont even go to my video for another complete answer... its obvious now that truth matters not to you'all it digging in over a position.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane Best I can tell, the only views your video has gotten have been from you, me and Nom! Cultivate, don't alienate, your audience.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes i havent the slightest wish to have a following. i do it mostly as a video response to your outlandish claims and suppositions and imagination.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane Well, then you should do a better job. For an example of a shill video that does a pretty good job, watch aliententity's effort; it's on my playlist. He actually put a HQ (mpeg) copy on to the internet archive
The planted tires really enrage him. And, of course, I am blocked there
You are a distraction; you have neither the knowlege nor skill to begin finding errors in my videos and, you are gutless - you won't make your comments where they belong
That's OK. all facts are mine
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes gutless, lol... i have found errors in your videos... i have more than enough knowledge and it requires no skill just observation, you just wont admit to them, the problem is you think you are smart and everyone else is an idiot, now you seem to have a set of rules and i dont follow YOUR rules and im far from gutless and am not a sheeple sorry. my challenge stands but you wont be man enough to accept it. i am your worst nightmare and you know it. truth is what i represent you fearit
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane I was going to ignore you; beddie by beckons, but...
You say you are my worst nightmare. Nah. You are a total amateur. Do some research on poetryhound - a true professional shill, seamless user of disinformation rules, seldom made an error. Apparently, when I died, lots of shills lost their jobs and, since I turned out to be alive, the pros won't come near me.
I may not be particularly smart (I do answer your noise proving ignorance), but I am the best researcher on YT. The best.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes Well arent you the cutest lil thang, all wrapped up in his self, awwww ))))) im certainly not going to research someone else. you are all i need. you have only answered one question of mine and... thats nisha using " about" everything was correct in the timeline but you conclude that even everyting was correct except their decision to use the word "about" her about was off by 15 minutes, wow. The video showed nothing wrong. Noms answer was that she thought it was 10 lol yup he said
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - Jack, I also become exasperated with C9F's obscure private jokes, and his vids are always difficult for me. I must study them. It's work! :-P
I asked you 2 questions. I wish you had tried finding the answers. If you had, and had read up on things like "parallax scrolling", "multiplane camera", "zoom lens photography", etc., like I had to (for hours), you'd know exactly what the title meant (which is very funny, now that I finally get the joke).
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen please please explane to me how "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" has to do with zooming or anything else... perhaps if he had said that if might have made better sense but not a thing he said in the video dealt with forces only apparent motion, which was quite correct...i honestly think you asked him about it and he hit you with the mumbo jumbo crap to get out of his error... you can of course believe him all you want.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@jaxplane - Jack, you now think I'm a liar? Since we've "known" each other for over 6 years now, and I've never given you reason to say that, that reflects more poorly upon your character than mine.
And, nope, this time, I didn't have to be tutored. As I said before, I spent hours finding out just WTF his obscure references to buildings locked together, zoom photography, and camera in a globe, etc., might mean. And then, voilà! The joke about "buildings hitting planes" became clear.
nameofthepen 6 months ago
@nameofthepen when did i call you a liar. i said i think you asked him and he told you... nothing about you not taking from there.... but you refuse to answer my question... what does newtons third law have to do with this video? you can avoid it but it doesnt go away... if he wanted to talk about parallax scrolling and mulitframe cameras, he should have done that... im sure todays animators are much more sophisticated than to create this time of cartoon video... third law please tell me
jaxplane 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jaxplane -Jack, this is getting boring. Yeah, you DID call me a liar. Let me refresh you:
Me: “If you..had read up on things like "parallax scrolling", "multiplane camera", "zoom lens photography", etc., like I had to (for hours), you'd know...”
You: “i honestly think you asked him about it and he hit you with the mumbo jumbo crap to get out of his error...”
nameofthepen 6 months ago
OK I will ask you the same thing I ask all you loser conspiracy nut jobs. If the plane crashes were faked, how the hell do you explain the thousands of New Yorkers that watched it happen from the streets? You cant, because your full of shit, the planes hit, get over it.
pitt15220 6 months ago
@pitt15220 You know, I rewatched the video and, it shows a faked video of a plane flying across NY and crashing into a tower on 911. It does not raise the issue of lying and fooled witnesses at all. You are welcome to prove this video makes a mistrake so you can feel more confident in your ignorance, but, you know, no one has in several years.
My most recent upload is a witness video; feel free to discuss those 2 witnesses there.
Be as vulgar as you need to be to express your science.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes Still didnt answer my question....how did they trick the people on the streets that watched it happen. its a simple question. How does it not raise the question of fooled witnesses when they saw it happen? you make no sense to me.
pitt15220 6 months ago
@pitt15220 I make no sense to you because you wish to discuss an issue not in contention on this video and I won't. There are lots of videos dealing with witnesses, choose one. If you choose one of mine and you ask a question related to the video, I will do my best to answer.
If you are just going to spam and troll, I won't.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes Not really sure how this sin't related to your video, since in the description you mention TV fakery. I would think that my question about how the witnesses on the streets were "tricked", it seems directly related. No Im not just trolling, I have asked that question many, many times, and never get an actual answer. I can add you to the list of people who can't answer, they just get mad and try to change the subject.
pitt15220 6 months ago
@pitt15220 Well thanks for visiting and commenting again.
Yeh, Joe Craine videos fall under the general category of TV fakery and each video contributes its own little bit to proving that. But, the general category of TV fakery is not within the domain of each video, only its narrow field. this video deals with the impossible tracking of a hand held camera, that's it.
You may say whatever you want here, but, the only thing that draws my attention is finding errors in the facts presented.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@pitt15220 lol, exactly right. it he is at a total loss of any answer at all, the the question does not fall into the specifics of the video, however, if he thinks he has a lame answer he will refer to other videos to try an bolster his non existant point.
jaxplane 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes I'm not going to find another one of your videos that you find acceptable for me to ask that question. I did find a few videos where someone will say something like they didnt see the second plane hit, but never found one where they come right out and say that there was no plane. So if you cant explain your thought process on this, then I will keep trying to find someone that doesnt just choose to not believe they hit without even knowing why they think that.
pitt15220 6 months ago
@pitt15220 I gave you an acceptable video; 2 professionals. I can assure you there are no records of anyone saying there were no tigers, elephants or mammoths either, that doesn't mean there were any.
There is a scientific principle; you don't make a hypothesis about someting you have not observed. There is no evidence that planes hit anything on 911, reasonable evidence that no planes crashed on 911 and overwhelming evidence that evidence was faked to make it look like planes crashed.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes OK, you say there is no evidence that planes hit anything on 9-11. That statement is directly related to my question that you refuse to answer, or change the direction of the conversation. You are reacting the exact same way every other conspiracy theorist did when I asked the same question. I believe I also predicted that is the way you would reply. How can you say there isn't any evidence, you won't even answer the question, as if you believe the streets were completely empty?
pitt15220 6 months ago
@pitt15220 This is not a general information site. You have a general question, find an appropriate place to air/ask it. Not here.
You seem to have taken a survey of some sort, that's good, why not publish the results somewhere people can react and criticize it? You seem to take umbrage with the fact that I insist that I will only answer questions directly related to this video.
You also seem incapable of moving your discussion to a video where your questions are covered.
I wonder why?
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@CNN911Fakes There is no format to this site at all, and I'm not taking a survey. I'm asking a simple question, the same one I have been asking, because I would like an answer. You, like all the others I tried to get an answer from, just dodge the question. I am fully capable of moving on, but I am amazed at the effort you put forth in avoiding any kind of answer to the question. I wonder why? For the record, I did ask this on another video, but I really wonder why your dodging the question...
pitt15220 6 months ago
@TylerDurdenMakesSoap Finally someone with a brain. The massive core is never mentioned in the pancake theory. I have used this visual; to no avail.
The floors of the WTC would be similar to donuts falling down a 1" dowel rod. My question has always been what's causing the dowel rod to collapse and even further, what caused it to collapse at the same rate that a rock falls through unobstructed air? Planted explosives anyone? Demolition anyone?
wizziebaldwin 7 months ago
Crackhead
tryithere 8 months ago
@tryithere Thanks for visitng and commenting.
The thoughtfulness of your analysis defies interpretation, perhaps you should watch a few more videos.
CNN911Fakes 8 months ago
Um.. its called panning the camera!!
Hey man you should post a video that goes something like this..
"Watch as a complete moron uploads ridiculous stupid 911 No Plane videos with dumb ass Walt Disney titling and tries to shove more nonsense down our throats"
roquefortfiles 10 months ago
@roquefortfiles Thanks for visiting and commenting.
Joe Craine gets his advice from a lot of different sources. He alsways appreciates a fresh point of view.
Your delusion that I control who watches my videos is amusing; I am the only person obliged to watch them, the 3.5 millin other views have all been voluntary.
If you ever venture further than your own banality, stop by my channel to find out more about the disney font.
Gorgonzola!
CNN911Fakes 10 months ago
@CNN911Fakes Why would i want to do that? The videos alone are ridiculous enough.
roquefortfiles 10 months ago
@roquefortfiles To prepare yourself to prove me wrong on every front. To demonstrate your superior research skills. To show the world that America loves being enslaved to foreign masters and you intend to beat the odds.
To show that no amount of factual content can change your mind from blindly following your masters.
CNN911Fakes 10 months ago
@CNN911Fakes
Sorry, and your point is?
roquefortfiles 10 months ago
Come on....
cball9779 1 year ago
your videos are gayyyy
JustAwsome2010 1 year ago
oh wasnt any planes huh. i guess the 2+ million new yorkers made it all up too for the sake of some crude oil huh. dont be an idiot. wake up people this really happened.
waylon691 1 year ago
OMG the whole thing with 9-11 was all true
reynoldsburgboy 1 year ago
point of the vid?
MrJamesb83 1 year ago
PGA tournaments are rigged too. I now see the truth! Thank you so much.
Tiger, you bastard!
Greg042869 1 year ago
yo when you make videos next time take them with proper fonts as the font you have been useing is gay and also your choice in colures is shit aswell scrub
mcnixxy 1 year ago
People still say "Newtons Third Law"?
Thats Awesome.
goofydexter 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck USA and all american fuck u bcz u america kill millions of iraqi and afghan people i wish i was there in airplane to kill all american
Because of you there are 2 million were killed and 5 million have left Iraq like myself and there are 3 million orphans due to all this America
i wish i was in airplane to kill much i can fuck fuck fuck USA
nofallyaqoo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TheCrimsonsCult (7 minutes ago) My ONLY and SOLE purpose for being here on YoUTube is~~~~>
ENTERTAINMENT!
From DAY ONE... AKA The Crimsonskull
TheCrimsonsCult (2 minutes ago) Show Hide 0 Marked as spam
Reply | Spam
HAHA,, I get some good jollies off here every now and then,, I go to sleep laughing and giggling sometimes it's so funny what ENTERTAINMENT I've gathered from my experiences here.
HeadLessMunkees 2 years ago
i think you"re all ridiculous,wasting time insulting each other and being rude and nasty,my 3 year old son is smarter than you lot, grow up sheeple
boroboy2110 2 years ago
i saw the video...it lookslike someone threw a washing-machine into the building
chasing91a 2 years ago
911 was an internal job. See "ZeitGeist" film.
rogerioctbacwb 2 years ago
Hey CNN911Fakes, have you ever heard of a tripod? Yeah, people are using them nowadays to hold their cameras steady and in place while filming stuff like this. You can pan real smoothly. Seriously, they're called tripods, & you can get one at Wal Mart.
And in that bit about Newton's 3rd law... Are you suggesting that someone was moving Manhattan toward the plane at 500 mph? Cause really it's easier too move the plane that fast.
dcs002 2 years ago
LOL! You just anally raped him with nice words and sarcasm. Nice one *Slaps a high five*
ihateforigners 2 years ago
So all the thousands and thousands of tv channels who aired this were playing a joke on us. Yeah right. I believe what I saw that day. I saw people dying. And that's horrible enough.
Jeever1981 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey george bush was behind this attack!
think how could bush get the nations support to attack iraq for oil because saddam hussein was doing oil business in DOLLARS but changed to EUROS so american economy was dropping dramatically,, so bush did this to create fear scare people to do that was to kill some of his own american citizens, thats what he did and every1 jumped on his band wagon of pack of lies,,
it was to get full control of iraqi oil!!
just watch "ron pauls PETRODOLLAR" documenty.
thugbulletproof 2 years ago
If the U.S. government is behind Sept 11th (& I'm not saying they're not), surely there was no reason to cover up missiles hitting the WTC with images of planes.
They could have just said that Al Qaeda used missiles, thus negating the need to even create a cover story of planes hitting the WTC.
Instead we have this far-fetched theory that ALL the TV networks and amateur footage was faked.
Ask all the people on the ground in NY that day. Are you telling me not one of them saw a plane?
guineapiggypiggy 2 years ago
your stupidity is immense. americans deserve our sympathy but actually we are just stunned by your ludicrous obsession with conspiracy theories. of course we shouldnt believe all we see, but if you really believe GWB has the brains to or desire to pull this off... then you are dumber than he is... and he is fukn dumb
OOOOERMRS 3 years ago
hahaha right
JoeM8zzProductions 2 years ago
Toy planes, toy planes, toy planes....
Can't say it fast, but I can give 5*****.
nameofthepen 3 years ago 2
watch?v=awy8cmcuBlk
a3HeadedMonkey 3 years ago
a3HeadedMonkey
All plugs are good plugs. warcrime911 (betcha know who that is, huh!) uploaded that attempt to trash me and then blocked me.
I guess the supporters of the murderer bush think the rules of guantanimo bay should also apply on YouTube.
I got a question for you. If you think that video is one that should be mentioned here, why have you never made a comment on it?
I don't need sock puppets. I don't need to try to trash others. I have the truth.
You should try it.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
@CNN911Fakes just go in a corner and just fade away...............dirtbag
powerball101 1 year ago
To add, while I believe in the notion that the public has been misled about 9/11, I must say that this video does not demonstrate Newton's 3rd law. It appears to be suggesting that something is wrong with the frame of the building on fire. So are they saying that a plane hitting a building should bounce off? or what
symphoma 3 years ago
symphoma
The same way an egg bounces off a bat.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Maybe you are saying the plane should splat and the building should be left with only a scratch?
When the windows in the building shatter and the airplane's sheet metal skin and thousands of parts are disconnected and bent beyond recognition, I cannot imagine what prevents most of the airplane's mass from entering the building.
I agree with you that there is a lot of Disneyfication on TV and the public is largely misled about 9/11.
symphoma 3 years ago
symphoma
That is not what we saw on TV and that is not what resulted based on the images of the holes documented by the NIST.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
@CNN911Fakes The same way an egg bounces off a bat??? Are you fucking joking me? The WTC was 90% air. Besides the steel shell it is basically open space. To say that the plane should have splattered on the outside of the building does not demonstrate science at all, All it demonstrates is how fucked up in the head you really are.
As3sinoL0C0 1 year ago
Being a physics student I had to pause this at 30 seconds in.
The video claims you add the objects' velocities and it is the same any way you look at it, but in actuality, you must multiply the velocity and mass of the objects to get their momentums. Momentum is conserved in collisions and explosions. Velocity is only conserved in collisions and explosions between objects of equal mass.
symphoma 3 years ago
symphoma
Nope. The relative momentums are fixed. A stationary plane has momentum relative to an object moving toward it.
The plane's momentum relative to neighboring objects is meaningless.
The only speed that counts is the combined speed of the collision.
Ever been to AAA driving school?
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Exonmorhp911 is cackpot he blocked me to. His goal is sway voting stooges. Agenda with a paycheck i bet. Im sure big media fakes are payin him. wont even dicuss flight 800. Now there is a cover up if i ever seen one.
mdog2700 3 years ago
mdog2700
xenomorph911 was suspneded for YT TOS violations and has reurned as
xenomorph911WTC
I think.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
City firemans motto-never trust a truss built high rise fire. The towers had truss supported floors. But they were coated to prevent any fire-heat failure.The coat was blown and or shredded off by crash=crashes. The molten steel some have spoke of was really molshiny molten liquid aluminum mostly from plane. Molten means liquid-steel glows red,and you dont need science charts to explain that unless you deal with some kind crazyman. You iether get it or you dont-stupid or not stupid.Plain simple
mdog2700 3 years ago
Youall tighten up your depends when you play on u-tub. Come clean you jackalls. you know slick willie did this
mdog2700 3 years ago
mdog2700
Not eloquent, but I share your opinion!
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
I do apolagise for allowing this to bring out the worst in me but all those people who lost thier lives and families losses. It just makes me want counter thier evil ignorant rants. God Bless you all, and may he forgive.
mdog2700 3 years ago
mdog2700
Don't you worry. Joe Craine said a long time ago...
"No victim was ever honored
No future victim ever protected
by the conviction/lynching of the
wrong person"
I am working to get the right guy.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
xenomorph911
Pls provide the YT watch= code for the video where you tell us how to obtain the highest quality non-compressed copy. I don't wish to search the internet or even your videos to find the one youe wish us to use.
Oh, and for the record. MPEG does not compress (unless told to); it removes redundancies, exact redundancies, preserving the integrity of the original.
That's why DVD's use Mpeg (although a better one is being developed)
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sighface, another stupid video about how it weren't planes that went into the buildings, I'm waiting for someone to make a video about saying the buildings are stills standing, it was just a big world hoax.
LittleDarkins 3 years ago
"I'm waiting for someone to make a video about saying the buildings are stills standing,..."
Most of the buildings ARE still standing; just not the 3 fire-trapping steel-framed high rises of wtc1, wtc2, and wtc7.
YougeneDebs 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sighface, those are the building I'm on about you moron.
LittleDarkins 3 years ago
Do you think New York should continue to build steel-framed fire traps?
Do you remember a time, back in the day, when American steel could withstand a fire?
YougeneDebs 3 years ago 2
Yes, but how many of them have the fire had 100s of ton of weight ontop of it, the steel will weaken and soften, due to the fire, and the 100s of ton will weigh it down..
Then it will collapse.
LittleDarkins 3 years ago
"weight ontop"
But, there was even MORE mass holding the top UP! There were 4 walls of steel, American steel -- steel that won the war! -- AND an innercore of 47-massive steel H-beams with extra cross-bracing and so forth; and it all came together in the Hat Truss.
No; that building wasn't in any danger from a fire. It was brought down by other means.
And recall that in 1974 there was a fire in WTC1 that burned for many hours! And the building held up!
YougeneDebs 3 years ago 2
I didn't get to read your response due to "ad hominem attacks"; sorry.
You may sent it to me direct, if you like.
In the meantime, please watch the following video about demolitions at the WTC:
watch?v=kgENHzD1xXk
Thank you.
YougeneDebs 3 years ago 2
LittleDarkin, I will be deleting this and any other comments with ad hominem attacks in them.
Pls repost if you have a point.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Actually, you should watch the video. You will find it is about the videographer and his fabulous camera work.
Ever do a handheld zoom?
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
littledarkins
Here's another video needing stupid comments
watch?v=RgTVchBl13o
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
I can't rate six stars!
excellent job my friend!
youzurk 3 years ago
I remember becoming conscious of this hoax.
Zhagarim 3 years ago 2
and of course when one takes a good look at the plane image one can see that it is surrounded with a pixel bleed.
NINEELEVENNEWS 3 years ago 7
The smoke and plane were drawn/pasted in.
pixels, undfortunately for the perps, are still little squares.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
They're compression artifacts, my avi was in high quality with barely any, the mpg2 had NONE, you've made it worse by compressing it a second time, then again by youtube's compression. Pixel bleed is a totally bogus claim, especially dealing with a video upload alterred by youtube's flash video compression.
Xenomorph911 3 years ago
Thus totally invalid, it would be laughed out of a court of law by a forensic video analyst.
Xenomorph911 3 years ago
Pardon me?
I used the file you uploaded without adjustment. It is your file. The frames are identified. Pull the frame you don't like, blow it up and show us what you mean.
I just took out single frames.
What happened to the integrity you promised?
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
A professional would use the mpg2. Youtube mpg2 to flash compression doesn't translate well.
Xenomorph911 3 years ago
I used what you claimed was high quality.
I used your file exactly as you provided it.
You got a better file, up load it.
Meanwhile, stop the squawk about the one you gave us to use.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Yeah, try the source at the secondary link. I provided 2 downloads, because youtube doesn't like DVD mpg2's nor widescreen either, the reason I cropped the mpg2 to avi.
Xenomorph911 3 years ago
I provided both the source video, in full quality, and a necessary conversion for youtube a week ago.
Xenomorph911 3 years ago
Tell us where the best version is and let us analyse it.
Stop the guessing games.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
It's all right there in my video info, see "New York: A documentary: Episode 8: Center of the World" or see "CNN: America Remembers" for high quality versions without any compression artifacts.
Xenomorph911 3 years ago
And the YT watch code is....
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
crappy compression is what youtube does.
Xenomorph911 3 years ago
livevideo is a lot better
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
Agreed, for once, but less popular or unknown by the dumbed-down masses.
Xenomorph911 3 years ago