Added: 5 years ago
From: samoht1977
Views: 227,392
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (143)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • really wish i paid more attention in class! then i'd know how it all works and if those over unity deals online were scams or not!

  • @korayek well I'm not a "nay-sayer"... I believe there's actually some way to do such things the right way, but I do think aswell that there are a lot of scams out there.

  • thats how my jicuzzy was made

  • hey, i also wanted to know if you ever tried gatorade for the electrolyte? haha....even "smart water" for the solution or are these edible electrolytes not the answer?  worth a try though.

  • good idea using this round metal with holes, you let the water circulate through and out. i do understand that you can use a subwoofer amplifier to squeeze out more power from the vehicles electrical system and can potentially overpower your hho generator. in this case, you can build an even bigger one ;) just curious, what did you use for the platters?

  • Dehumidified water is very impure. You would probably get even better results with a purer water source

  • This one as of our first experiments. Makes lots of bubbles but not near as efficient as the new dry cells or our hybrid cells...

  • Check this out:

    wwwproHformancecom

    We have the best cells on the market, runs extremely efficient.  This cell it the best you can get for the money take a look.

    proHformance

  • This is old school but still shows how easy it easy to make. The newer hybrid cells make 10 times the volume of hydrogen and are way more efficient.

  • Hydrolysis is actually the synthesis of one molecule by combining separate molecules by adding water and energy or a catalyst. What you have here is electrolysis, the separation of water molecules into H and O. Small technicality but im sure everyone understood what this was. :)

  • @Betelgeuse150 yes, you're right indeed ;)

  • @Betelgeuse150 thank you for the technical clarification ;)

  • Sound very nice design, you need test over 2L in min is accept.

  • You should put a NO SMOKING signal in that room xD

  • Drugs?

  • aaaargh! ...be honest: you are chasing me!!

  • imagine if you had access to superconductive non-corrosive materials?? you would produce twice, maybe 3 times the hydrogen than you would using the normal grade stainless steel. there has to be other materials, no matter how small, you could add to the system for greater efficiency?

  • is this 110V AC?

    while it looks cool it's not ideal to have the gas mixed. not to mention dangerous.

    some of you might compress it into a gas tank and light what comes out of it as you would a light gas and that would be bad...

  • what happens with the water? when all HHO consumed - water dissapear?

  • Well, everything in this world is about "transformation". Everything transforms in something else: in this case, water turns into gas. Then you burn it, if you like, turning gas into energy (heat) and some little things...

  • ok. and does the amount of energy from gas burning - equal to the amount of electric energy needed to produce that amount of gas?

  • See... the goal is to acheive the maximum amount of gas (to be burned later on) with the less expense of energy. Putting current (drawn from mains socket) to do it is not the answer. Using solar power instead to feed some kind of "reactor" to produce gas using water would be really cool: we'd be using the largest nuclear reactor we could put our hands on: the sun.

  • 2nd law of thermodynamics - is like - you cant produce more energy then you spent. If you want to use Sun - you can allready do it trough the usage of the solar panels- so why bother to producing hho from that enerhy - is there a steal(mint)??

  • Maybe im missing something - do HHo produce vast amounts of energy then were spent to produce it?

  • Well, no one is talking about "over unity" or something similar here. It's all about turning water into fuel - not using oil during the process.

  • @jfunf The point is to use a cleaner source of energy. Burning hydrogen in the gas is helping the combustion which makes it less poluting... Beside, the alternator does give out more energy than is needed to recharge de battery and use the accessories, isn't it?

  • @youtuubbguy66 Every watt of load you put on the alternator causes more than a watt worth of added load onto the engine. The more you load an alternator, the harder it is to turn it.

    Adding hydrogen to the intake of an inefficient engine can improve the efficiency enough to make it worth doing but a better answer is to have an efficient engine. You gain far more by improving the engine.

  • @knowledgemonger Get a bigger/better alternator. Depending on the ratio of HHO/gasoline u desire and the displacement of the engine, the load for an adequately sized electrolysis cell would be between 5-20 amps. Most 'stock' car alternators are rated around 80-100 amps, aftermarket alternators are rated around 120-160 amps.

    Again, depending on the setup, the stock alternator may work fine. A good indication is how much your headlamps dim when you apply the load, like an insane audio system :D

  • @Starcruiser81 A bigger alternator driving a bigger load puts a larger load on the engine. The process from the shaft of the alternator to the hydrogen produced is always a net energy loser. You are always taking more power away from the engine than what is available in the gas produced.

    A: I bit myself on the nose

    B: How can you do that your nose is above your mouth?

    A: Simple, I stood on a chair

  • @knowledgemonger lol, true, but if you use HHO AND GAS the law of conservation of energy is trumped, still burning gas, but much less per mile :D

  • @Starcruiser81 If I put my invisible pink unicorn on a treadmill, we could get all the energy we want.

    There really is no such thing as HHO. It is just a mixture of H2, O2 and water vapor. The law of conservation of energy is still the law. Mother nature won't let you break it.

  • Combustion = engine = cars that can run on water?

  • Ouch... we're back with that "run-a-car-with-it" thing again... heheheh ;) Yeah it would be nice to see something similar... but I remember the "Eolo" car, wich used to run on compresser air... it reached the production stage, and then everything disappeared - LITERALLY. Search the Tube for more info about it: a very interesting story...

  • Hydrogen is a funny concept though... you get water. use electricity to create HHO than burn it...it than goes bak to water and the process repeats.....super freen and environmental

  • The funniest thing is that 75% of the planet's surface is covered with water...

  • And because there is 2 atoms of hydrogen in water....Hydrogen is truly the most abundant resource in the world!!

  • @cappydawg ...the universe...

  • @samoht1977 75.00001 to be exact lol

  • @cappydawg If you can produce the electricity to crack the water from something green like solar - its a viable solution to STORE the energy for use in fuel cells, engines, or thermally later. The beauty of course is the process is zero emission from the point that the hydrogen is created - if you solve the energy input problem, you have it licked.

  • @cappydawg Not quite, if you burn hydrogen you don't get water, if you recombine water with oxigen like in the fuel cell, then you get water. I am pretty sure that if you burn hydrogen it is a regular although incredibly clean combustion.

  • @MateWiggy If you burn hydrogen you do get water in the form of steam. The reason normal car exhaust has a lot of water in it is because gasoline has more hydrogen atoms in it than carbon. If you cool down the exhaust, you get more weight in water out than the weight of the fuel that went in.

    Back in the days of the "air ship" this fact was used to make ballast water to compensate for the weight of the fuel burned.

  • @MateWiggy No, I believe your wrong it comes back as evaporated air >.>.

  • looks loke superwavefusion to me

  • Minor safety problem with this setup: both gases are mixed in the exact proportions for an explosive ectothermic reaction. It is much safer to separate the gases then recombine them in a jet or something. I've seen beakers blown into shards using the combined gases. Good for bomb making, bad for experimenting.

  • At the time I was experimenting that thing, I had a steel canister... wich blew with a very, very, VEEEERY loud bang - my neighbour came ringing at my door, asking if I was ok ;) that's obviously not suitable for combustion, it was just for experimenting. Very tight precautions must be taken when turning the "gas production line" into "combustion line".

  • also can u please explain to me what a resonator is or a pulsed circuit is thank you

  • what is the by product in the outcome and if u were to use water without anything else would u have the same effect without any by product?please reply

  • ya i wouldnt be breathing that in...hexavalent chromium....ouch

  • What works better, high amp with low voltage, or high voltage with low amp?

  • The goal is to acheive high gas production with as less power consumption as possible. Power is given by V * I, where V=Voltage and I=Currrent. Increasing too much power will give you Heat, wich you don't need. Too much current means lot of heat, and too much voltage causes arcing between plates.

  • I assume that the principal is that the more surface area, the more efficient the electrolysis is. If that's the case, the next step would be to develop a stainless steel sponge. (sponges have huge surface area due to their design, which contains thousands of nooks and passageways)

  • Steel wool

  • wouldn't there be short circuit cause of that?

  • place your plates at the bottom of a 7ft tube and the gases will strip off quicker allowing more plate contact with liquid. water will be cloudy on top instead of in ionic transfer area

  • It's about pressure, isn't it?

  • yes, also make your plates vertical so gases can freely escape the plates and use a coil driver circuit to generate square wave high voltage low amperage with a frequency that resonates with the plates vary the freq until your gas flow indicator gives maximum production. horizontal plates trap gas and arcing in the gas can have bad results.

  • Question about this demo - ( # nine-thousand and ninety-nine!)

    Most all of these 'say' the reading, or show a "gas" flow meter result?!?

    Thats sort'a like trying to improve on your driving skill, by practicing at night with your damn headlights off.?.

    You can "buy" one, or even make a crude gas flow (volume) measuring device outa used plastic bottles.

    Hard to beleive they're all that stupid - So, are these (100eds) of vids put up just to Dumn-Down viewers???? They're meaningless!

  • Learn to read the comments in the description before posting such things...

  • If (or when) you use a pulsed circuit, be sure not to use an electrolyte. Much more efficient without one.

  • hey man, I really like your design. am I right in thinking its about 6 plates going + - + - + or similar? Looks really nice and gets good results. Do you find the closer your plates the better it works? Also what current are you using, I've been using a car battery recharger so its 12v at 2.5 amps. Cheers

  • yes, it was an 8 plates cell in + and - (alternatively) configuration. And Yes, The closer, the better. 12V at 2.5 Amps is quite good!

  • similar to ultio1's video.take a look at electrikride as well. lots of production. just a note to some of the comments i've seen here. it's pretty obvious it takes more energy than you get out when you try to make HHO. a lot of us realise how inefficient internal combustion engines are. if we can use the waste energy to make the HHO and apply it to the combustion chamber the combustion may be more efficient. i would like to see more vids on mileage and emmissions. thanks for the video.

  • dun worry.. he's just another brad who holds on to his precious theories learnt from nursery schools.. haha

  • sorry about "one our", I meant to say one hour.

  • no, nothing "disappeared" ;)

  • wow, you're being so rude. He didn't make all these claims. What has you in such a tail spin?

    Also, you made a lot of assumptions in your energy statements. Efficiency for both electrolysis and combustion is highly dependant on implementation.

  • being rude is the point, or I would call it sarcastic, cynical, ironic or staggered in the light of the sheer extent of stupidity of people and their mystical ability to withstand any form of logic.

    Actually, I am Mr. Nice, but if people do not like being offended than they should at least reflect for a split of a second what they are saying or what others are saying about them, in particular in case where they apparently have not put any thought at all.

  • Precisely this is the conspiracy theory, because either by the resonance method or using this energy hungry old procedure, BOTH ways aquire the power from SUN, which is given for free, the same way the now expensive OIL was produced with way more power per unit of weight and took millions of years to be produced. So this physic comment is a piss out of the potty.

  • could you include in that physics lesson that all fuel requires more energy to produce than is returned? that is, unless you've discovered cold fusion.

    someone should tell those idiots at NASA to stop using hydrogen in the external tank.

  • what do u mean? The energy you lose on the way from the point where crude oil is extracted to the point where the gasoline is provided at the gas station? Yes, sure, energy is "lost" on the way through tranpostrtaion of oil, transformation, etc.

    And that is why u want to waste even more energy on the production of H2, or what?? as you can burn the fuel directly ... oh, forgot, in this case you could not tell your mates at the pub that you drive a "zero-emission" car, hihihihi haha hihi.

  • I did the same thing but not with stainless steel and my (copper) electrodes corroded (disappeared in the end). Were your strainers intact or did you notice some kind of damage on them after a while? If there is damage it happens shortly, easily one our with 12 volts.

  • Are you sure you are producing hydrogen gas and oxygen gas and not just water vapor? If that is uncontained H2 and O2, you are living very dangerously.

  • oh, c'mon! FIRST: the "test" ran only for few minutes, therefore the reactor was unable to deliver any considerable amount of anything - SECOND: my nose was not linked to the reactor with a rubber tube ;)

  • hey moron, can you tell me why you are so aggressive? maybe you want to read the comments before you starts your attacks. you racist piece of shit. i don't see any relation with this video and your comments... but do it, go to united state and become rich, or just stay in front of your computer commenting on video you don't even like... that, for me is being a retard.

  • Careful Baking Soda and Hydrolysis=Carbon Dioxide, and Carbon Monoxide gas

  • I really have to go USA! This country is a gold mine for me. Telling people that you invented something that solves the world's energy problem is enough. Nobody even spends one second on critically analyzing the "information" given and they will buy this shit and even create a conspiracy theory to explain why the "invention" does not work at all. I really underestimated the stupidity of the average people in USA. Hihihahah hoh hahahah ... too hilarious!! hihihih hahha .. I will make tons money!!

  • Totally agree with you... besides, I'm from Italy ;) But you'll be surprised to see how all that you said about energy is already applicable to smaller, less-noticeable, everyday-little-things...

  • I posted my comments which I posted on an similar video from an American. Same bullshit as yours. Do you think I want to waste my precious time on adapting the contents to an Italian style??

    Of course, you find lots of H2 devices in daily life. Get some European quality engineering like the Mercedes Fuel Cell Car or the BMW 7 series hydrogen, for instance, top speed 242 km/h (ok, not fast enough, I admit). ut the production, transportation and storage is.

  • Ok, I'll be clear with you for the very last time: AGAIN, I'm not trying to run anything with that "thing" - AGAIN: it was just an experiment, done for a friend - AGAIN: no claims, no "over-unity", no "energy of the future", no "water for fuel" (I ain't Harry Potter, ok???). Again, no offence to anyone.

    Furthermore, I believe much more in direct or indirect solar rather than Hydrogen.

    Hope you got the point now.

  • True but I don't think there would be any real benefit when compared to the Cost of the outlay

  • Basic electrolosis, but due to incontrovertable LAWS of PHYSICS there is ABSOLUTLY no way to produce enough power ie Hydrogen and Oxygen from the electrolosis (Automotive) as proposed by all these STUPID Fuel Cells and reactors people like Water4Gas are selling to both

    1 To run the vehicle engine thereby producing DC current required.

    2 Actually produce enough H and O2 for adequate combustion and therefore mobility.

  • I'm not trying to run anything with it ;)

  • Mozzmann but what if you add the hydrogen oxygen gas to a lean fuel mix (combustion engine)?

  • The main problem with this generator and systems like it is that the energy required to produce this gas/fuel is typically generated by BURNING FOSSIL FUELS. Not only that, but the energy to produce this fuel is typically much higher than the energy you get out of it, due to thermal losses etc. Now powering this generator using wind and/or solar... THERE's the kicker.

  • I've been telling this for some time now. Those things should be feeded with solar cells, so the gas could be stored and burned later on. It's barely clear that if you burn fossil fuels to produce hho there's no gain!

  • sciplus . com has some reasonable solar panels... the descriptions are a bit weird though

  • You use gasoline to turn the engine, which turns the alternator, which produces the power to run the cell... but better to use said power to run a cell which produces a gas that makes gasoline burn more completely, thus increasing efficiency as opposed to using it to make your car stereo louder

  • @mryesterday How about using a small motor such as a scooter engine, to produce electricity. Then with this electricity, produce hydrogen to feed the car's engine? Think that could work?

  • The plans the guys at hho-hybrid . com seem much simpler configuration and are producing great results according to "amazinghybrid" and others. I bought plans for $19.95 and they are totally helping me put it all together!!

  • Try it with ascorbic acid - vitamin C tablet. Use just a tiny wee smidgeon of a bit.

  • I called mine a hydratron water piston, mainly because my version is about six stories high and a city block square, and it is a municipal energy generation station. I want to build one very much.

    DO YOU PUT PHOSPHORIC ACID INTO YOUR WATER?

  • phosphoric acid for conductivity?

  • Well done...excellent!

  • Nice, i did something like this myself, but i pumped way too much current through the water and made it boil.

  • the goal here is not boil water (putting a pan on a stove would be easier). The goal is split water, wich is different ;)

  • Way too smart for me!! I need to know the "basics" of hydrolis!! Thank you anyway.

  • Electric current is led to flow between two metals, submerged in water. Because of salt and other materials, water carry electric current between the two metals. During the process, the water molecule (H2O) is split in two atoms of Hydrogen (H2) an one of Oxygen (O), wich are flammable gases.

  • Oxygen isnt flammable, it feeds fire, but i think everyone gets the point

  • True that. Oxygen is the basic ingredient of the "burning" recipe: a flame is a violent form of oxidation, wich involves oxygen and other things (to be oxidated). That's why most flame-extinguishing systems involves CO2 or "Halon", a ratehr danerous gas wich "suffocates" flames (and people) by elimininating oxygen in the air.

  • Halon is (was) not a dangerous gas. I used to work with a halon installation group. Each installation was tested with a full dump of the halon system into the room being protected. The halon installers were in the room during the dump checking each injection site for full flow. Halon works only at the ignition source. The heat converts the halon into a gas that prevents oxygen from reaching the flame and instantly stops combustion. CO2 is the one that can suffocate.

  • It's not producing Halon, it's producing Hydroxy

  • hydrogen is fun

  • hydrogen is future

  • it is, only problem is getting the energy to make hydrogen

  • SUN is the answer... it's Super Ultra Natural, and it's free... that is why BOC (big oil companys) do not like it ;)

  • no offence but solor power will only become usefull if the panels become more efficent (unline the 17% there at now, well consumer ones are)

  • no offence at all.. that is true. I know large companies that runs large machines (fridge and so on)... on solar. Others Illuminate their offices with solar. Obviusly, it's not pure-solar, but a hybrid solution... wich, imho, it's not a bad idea - for now.

  • cheaper + more efficent

    then oil companys will be a thing of the past

    =]

  • what r your electrodes made out of?

  • stainless steel

  • if im not very incorrect, stainless steel, being an alloy releases poisenous by products during electolosis, where as graphite or platinium is far safer.. oh i wanted to do electolosis on calcium cloride, how would you do this?

  • I'm absolutely ignorant on this subject but would like to know more.Any chance of a tutorial clip?

  • You are covering the position of a student wandering around inside a big, big, big, big, big (please someone stop me) university: You are on the Internet... try to search something about "Hydrolysis", or "hho", or "hydrogen"... and oh, prepare to be patient: you'll have to read and watch A LOT! lucky you guys, born in the Internet era!

  • If w/o calculations, what are those values at 1:26 then ?

  • ...straight to the point, huh? ;) Just a measurement for voltage and current: I was pulling 3,7 Amps out of a 12V battery (that was dropping to 10), but since there's no measurement for the amount of gas produced, it's quite useless. The gas flow seems nice, though.

  • I see. Well, good experiment in the spare-time. The gas flow is nice.

  • 3,7 A x 12 V = 45 Watt. It would be really nice if you took some sort of balloon or anything that made you able to measure the volume of HyrdoOxygen (I refrain from Using the word HHO, when its associated with the "invention" HHO, like the properties of Hydrogen gas and oxygen haven't been known for decades). Even better would be if you seperated the positive and negative poles (if possible) and measured Hydrogen (should be negative pole?). Maybe your setup will strike gold.

  • Guys - if i show this to my Husband (diesel mechanic) do you think he could make 1 for the farm house?

  • you all could try.. no wait, you *SHOULD* try. The goal is using solar power though. Sun is for free (yet). Gather Electric current via photovoltaics, split water with electrolysis and store the gas in tanks. Solar maybe not auitable for "on-demand" applications, but you cluod leave it running on sunny days and store your gas for later use.

  • thanks i'll show this to him :D, appreciated!!

  • For 1litre of hydrogen, you need 144amperes going through the electrolyte for 1minute. Or 72amperes for two minutes etc. Oxygen is released simultaneously with hydrogen, but with half rate.

    So if your electrolyser will draw 144amps for one minute, you will create 1.5litres of gas mixture consisting of 1litre H2 and 0.5l O2.

  • I think you left out the decimal point. 14.4amps would be more like it.

  • I have taken these numbers from:

    1.)my chemistry book,

    2.)I calculated them myself,

    3.)my colegue calcutate it on his own way,

    4.)from the internet

    why are people giving me negative feedback is a mystery to me, HAHAHA

  • All you need to pulse it is a square wave oscilator using a 555 timer and then drive some FET banks I could probably show you a CCT to use. I think a PWM motor driver CCT would do the job.

  • i have an electralysis cell bigger than that that pulls almost 90 amps from a large deep-cycle 12 volt battery. i used 0 gauge jumper cables. needless to say, the fluid will boil with in 10 minutes.

  • 90 amps could make an airplane vanish in a second :D no kidding, 90Amps * 12 Volts gives out a power of 1080 Watts: a microwave oven has a power of 800W. You built a water boiler, not a hydrolizer :rotfl:

  • it will make 2 liters a minute. i know its not efficent, but i dont care too much because its so simple.

  • 90 amps? Cant possibly produce much at all. Should be down 9-15 amp to be efficient. Even with 24 volts should be able to run under 25 amps. Just like samoht1977 said, You built a boiler.

  • A lot of power?

    How many amperes do you need for this?

  • OK fella. When you do your thing there are you getting a signif. temp increase in the water like I am? I'm working on a sort of radiator and a small elec. fountain pump to mount in front of the rad. like a trans cooler.

    Please let us know wnat sort of press. you can produce by putting it into a sealed container and use a press. guage. I'm also working on using a bunch of empty 30#(revamped) freon cans for storage but need the press.

  • No, unfortunately I'm no more into it. I'm coming to see what you are doing though...

  • Great cell man! how many amps do you use? what is the voltage applied to the lens? how much gas does it produce? did you run your lawnmower with it already? do you use straight 12v dc or pulsed? HEHEHEHEHEAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH ;)

  • HEHEHehehheh ;) Yes, that's quite everything I'd like to see... a similar system running a lawnmower!

  • very good .... now put it in a reactor thats resiste to pressure ;)

  • I dont know if you have this infor, FIrst wave is a square wave with 10:1 ratio at 12-250KHZ, second wave saw tooth 17-22 Hz. God bless.

  • Thanks for the info, I hope that any1 passing by will read that. I'm no deep in electronics so I'll leavo to someone the developing of the circuitry..

  • ...somebody told me to use a function generator instead of a pulse width modulator (TO save money)

  • Use a Flux Capacitor and you would save a mountain of money. Just use everyday household products and toss the waste in the Ol' fluxo and shazzzam.

  • Heheh! this one comes from "back to the future pt.II", if I'm not wrong ;)

  • so if you use the pulsed dc then you would get 12-250khz per pulse?

  • um... isnt "1 pulse" like 1 cycle; 1hz? so 12-250khz would be 12-250 thousand cycles yeah

    but i think Stan Meyer said specifically he cracked water "just under 20khz" so use info from his patent (inducing high voltage AC into the plates rather than extra-low voltage DC) cause he perfected it... And if yur not that good with electronics, how bout trying a similar circuit to a flouro tube? replace the tube with your cell (the inductor or 'ballast' actually increases the voltage in the circuit)

  • what happened to sound?

  • No sound at all for this ;)

  • Tyokol any evidence to back up your claim would be greatly appreciated.

  • ok...this is bullshit

  • Mr Wizard totally needed to have an episode about electrolysis :)

  • This was just an experiment to demonstrate to a friend how drilled plates worked.

  • Oh no, that's cool.. I just mean, electrolysis is a really simple process (I dropped a 4.2v battery into water once by accident and later noticed the bubbles), and it would've been cool if electrolysis is something we were taught as a part of our scientific youth, with mr. wizard or bill nye.

  • at 2:00 its alive its alive frankeinstin its a live

  • Yes it is indeed ;) I only wanted to show better the configuration of the "reactor"

  • hey what kind of voltage/amps/hertz/amplitude were u using/or would work the best...

  • "Stanship Trooper II" on youtube, has the stats at the end of his.

  • Yes I know stanship trooper's ;)

  • Are you using the diode/voltage ladder setup Meyer's used?

  • Nothing at all: only DC

  • damn ur lucky ur not breathing in the H2 coz from a baking soda which is an alkali product + water + electrolysis and heat = u know H2 gas suppose to be release into the air. and some harmful by product. Well help me... coz i'm building one based only on h20 and humidifiers.

  • What kind of info do you need about it?

  • Amazing.

  • I'd like to build a system wich collects the gas and for burning it later, but that gas is very dangerous if you don't play it the right way.. and I don't have the right knowledge in "pressurized-things", so I'm giving it up momentarily

  • Work on a way to only produce what you need for the moment... thereby eliminating the need to store it. You would need to figure out how much you will need for (X) operation and how quickly it can produce that amount and also how much it produces vs. being used. ;) Beats having to figure out how to store it.

  • nice work, I think Stan Meyers would be proud. I have read all his patents, I could tell he had something, and now many are replication his work with great results. God bless ,keep going and keep it free for all

  • I just love love the way the HHO appears to just leap

    off of the plates :o)

    /ChuckD....

  • sam- thanks for you comment on my video- yea- that Matrix thing is worked to death- but this is a vid about a famous local murder 47 years ago- and the guy in jail is innocent Plus most of the local people watching probably think the Matrix is a car!- Also- holy crap- I think you might be right about the UFO! Keep working on your experiments! Dexter

  • Can't even spell hydrolysis - not a good start

  • sorry man... I'm JUST Italian ;D

  • try a alternitive metal plates of nickel & copper Both catalysts, By utilizing alternating plates out of high quality nickel and copper from expanded metal stock (you need more surface area and the HH02 likes to accumulate on sharp points) The two metals placed in series and by using Potasium Hydroxide (Caustic Soda-Oven Clean) as a electrilizer you have a natural battery. By reducing resistance you should end up with more production by using less amperage.