Ow my god... the captain of this flight doesnt have good hims work. This procedures are saying; the captain must doing hims plane safety check. If this happend, has he doing bad hims work.
@dgifford88 They don't always, but many seem too. Probably because of the huge amount of fuel carried...once a spark, etc. connects with the jet fuel...I'll try to find more info I'm curious of this myself.
May 25th, 1979, in Des Plaines Illinois. It was sunny that day and very warm. I saw this plane shoot over us at about 300ft. The teachers were screaming and crying. I couldn't take my eyes off the plane. Very tragic and very traumatic. To this very day ( 30+ yrs later ) , I don't fly. And the last two days I keep envisioning everything. God Bless those families and those who lost their lives in this crash.
I don't know why everyone is dissing the DC-10. It did a some safety problems with the cargo door, but that was fixed. This crash was caused human error on the maintenance side. The only other thing that was wrong with the DC-10 was the design of the hydraulic system, but they fixed that after flight 232 at siux city. It's sad people fix problems after disasters. I like it's younger brother better though. The MD-11, my favorite airliner.
well all commercial Air Lines should have a video camera from the out side ,that way the pilot can see All the planes components,engine fuselage evrything!
Well, Now a days, they do have cameras everywhere in/out side the planes.
Not just only that. they have designe the system with remote control. so if someone tries to Highjake the plane then they can fly/control the plane from other army planes or something like that.
those poor people.u would think that with all our technology they cant build these things any safer. i think they just dont want to spend the time or money.
sam--by the time youre far enough down the runway to take off, there isnt enough runway left to stop in time. its a guarenteed crash if you try and land it right away.
Normally I've seen it on National Geographic channel. There are two shows: "Seconds From Disaster" [this video clip] and "Air Emergency". They do not have weekly time slots so you have to check National Geo. web site for times.
See the NTSB report (link on Wikipedia entry). Not all electrical power was lost, but different engines powered different electrical systems. Notably, the "slats disagree" warning and the stickshaker were disabled. Consequently, pilots didn't know that left outboard slats retracted, raising the stall speed on the left wing only (hence the left roll). The FE could've flipped a switch for auxiliary power, but he would have had to swivel his seat & stand up to reach it, so he didn't.
Why did the plane loose it's electrical power? Two engines were remaining so why did they loose all electrical power? And why drained ALL hydraulic fuel away? You can see that only one of three independent hydraulic systems is leaking
That is because the airplane stall when losing air speed. Normally aircrafts will use at lease 75% of throttle which power up engines for generate enough air lifts to take off.
i know that -_- ... the plane stalled because the slats "moved" in because the hydraulic fuel leaked away ... but my question is why did the cockpit loose all electrical power? 2 engines were remaining to provide electrical power! And why did all the hydraulic fuel drainned away?? You can see on this video that just ONE! of three independent hydraulic system had a whole in it -_- ...
When the engine blew away, temporary short circuit occur in aircraft. Pilot can recover its system by turn on the small button just beside the air speed autopilot adjustment button. But, they had failed to do so.
I'm not sure but i think at that time the DC10s hydraulic lines dint have shut off valves so if one hydraulic line burst all the fluid leaked out. something like that
Este accidente lo recuerdo muy bien por las fotos sacadas por el periodico. Realmente no habia nada que hacer por parte de nadie. No entiendo como Amercian Airlines sigue siendo lider a pesar de numerosos accidentes con victimas fatales. Aqui se empeiza a vislumbrar sus terribles fallas. Aramis
I'm glad this video acknowledges that the engine and wing were not visible from the cockpit, so the flight crew had no idea of the extent of the damage. The crew followed engine out procedure and unknowingly stalled the left wing due to loss of hydraulics and electricity. The tower saw the engine fall off and failed to inform the flight crew, although "Oh shit" was probably a very appropriate reaction to such a thing. Given the circumstances, the flight was doomed.
Know something about DC-10s having been a SO on one. Not all hydraulics or electrics were lost. The pilots didn't know what they had. Not only did the engine fail, it was truly lost. They maintained flying speed appropriate to their takeoff configuration, just as they were trained. When the slats retracted, the stall speed of the wing raised sharply above their current flying speed, and it stalled. IF they been faster, had they known, it is theorized they could have returned for a landing.
It was theorized that they could land but during flight simulators (mentioned on the History Channel special on this) it was proven that there was no way they would be able to land because any turn they make they would flip over.
The crew didn't know what they had. If they had known, kept their speed up, there were enough systems remaining to sort things out and return for a landing. Hindsight is 20/20 but for sure, with added speed, the plane could have continued flying. The adopted procedure industry wide as a result is, if you have any engine failure, keep your existing speed rather than slow back to V2. This still may not be enough.
It was their emergency procedures that caused it to stall. The emergency procedure stated to power engines down to V2 which can stall the plane on takeoff. It wasn`t the pilots fault they did everything right. It was the Emergency Checklist that killed them, Sadly.
As a follow-up to this a similar situation occured in Amsterdam with El-Al Flt. 1862 when a very similiar situation occured. Everything was fine and he was flying until he tried to land.
this is seconds from disaster not air disaster
jackrabbittt333 4 months ago
loses
lacrossestar83 6 months ago
This crash happened on my 12th birthday. A Godawful tragedy.
4wheelerDJ 9 months ago
Ong
ThePablo2201 10 months ago
that cockpit they were in was a 737 the throttle and over head gave it away
WackyBroProductions 1 year ago 3
this is exactly why im afraid to fly
charmangolakers1 1 year ago
great summary of an hour-long program. RIP everyone on that flight
DV5230US 1 year ago 2
Ow my god... the captain of this flight doesnt have good hims work. This procedures are saying; the captain must doing hims plane safety check. If this happend, has he doing bad hims work.
Lbrianfly 1 year ago
I was always scared on take off if one of the engines would break off like that
hiphopboy29 1 year ago
why do the planes always explode when the crash?
dgifford88 1 year ago
@dgifford88 They don't always, but many seem too. Probably because of the huge amount of fuel carried...once a spark, etc. connects with the jet fuel...I'll try to find more info I'm curious of this myself.
Kammerz10 1 year ago
@Kammerz10 it's correct ;)
kingsharkoon 1 year ago
What was the Alaska Airlines plane --a dc-10 right?? Those pilots had to fly it upside down until it finally nosed into the pacific.
dwilmer7 1 year ago
@dwilmer7 American Airlines.
Kammerz10 1 year ago
May 25th, 1979, in Des Plaines Illinois. It was sunny that day and very warm. I saw this plane shoot over us at about 300ft. The teachers were screaming and crying. I couldn't take my eyes off the plane. Very tragic and very traumatic. To this very day ( 30+ yrs later ) , I don't fly. And the last two days I keep envisioning everything. God Bless those families and those who lost their lives in this crash.
1tbounty 1 year ago
what show?
MrSpicyPickle 1 year ago
I don't know why everyone is dissing the DC-10. It did a some safety problems with the cargo door, but that was fixed. This crash was caused human error on the maintenance side. The only other thing that was wrong with the DC-10 was the design of the hydraulic system, but they fixed that after flight 232 at siux city. It's sad people fix problems after disasters. I like it's younger brother better though. The MD-11, my favorite airliner.
BusterBunker 2 years ago
dc-10s are and were death traps
KrazyTrain18 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
1RadicalOne 2 years ago
I don't believe there is footage of this crash, just a few pictures.
weirdalfan272point0 2 years ago
# 191 must be cursed, delta 191 also crashed
kurtw71 2 years ago
Gosh DC planes are SO PRONE TO AIR CRASHES I noticed. they're CURSED.
tracingstars4 2 years ago
es gibt auch eine deutsche version
tarkan1995 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i heat the planes, i heats the planes!!!!!!
valentinocolovini 3 years ago
okay... i seriously dont know why im even watching this im already terrified of plnes as it is!
mRsNiCkJoNaSxoxo 3 years ago
well all commercial Air Lines should have a video camera from the out side ,that way the pilot can see All the planes components,engine fuselage evrything!
solomonpilot767 3 years ago
Well, Now a days, they do have cameras everywhere in/out side the planes.
Not just only that. they have designe the system with remote control. so if someone tries to Highjake the plane then they can fly/control the plane from other army planes or something like that.
ashassk 2 years ago
name is v1 et non v2
pikiri75 3 years ago
those poor people.u would think that with all our technology they cant build these things any safer. i think they just dont want to spend the time or money.
JupiterBleu 3 years ago
It was a simple bolt that cracked. What are you gonna do?
michaeld5 3 years ago
Damn, i just flew a flight for USAVA USA191
duk309 3 years ago
why dint you stop the plane
sam42535624 3 years ago
sam--by the time youre far enough down the runway to take off, there isnt enough runway left to stop in time. its a guarenteed crash if you try and land it right away.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
Pretty much after V2 you have to pull up if no extra runway is available.
UAL4ever 3 years ago
ok guys wats the number of the channels?
ploop092 3 years ago
can any1 tell me wat channel this is on on dish and when its on?
ploop092 3 years ago
Normally I've seen it on National Geographic channel. There are two shows: "Seconds From Disaster" [this video clip] and "Air Emergency". They do not have weekly time slots so you have to check National Geo. web site for times.
piolet41 3 years ago
Its the chinges channel.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
I was wrong. The COMAIR was Flight 5191.
TOPOFFMAN 3 years ago
I was wrong. The COMAIR was Flight 5191.
TOPOFFMAN 3 years ago 5
The other one was Comair 191, A small CRJ Regional jet.
TOPOFFMAN 3 years ago
so..what'up with 191 flights..there's actualy 3 accidents..191 flight?!!
zappaflorida 3 years ago
Different airlines. This was American. Delta had one. I dont amemeber the 3rd.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
Also, 273 was the exact number of passengers on KLM 4805. Spooky
robg5555 3 years ago
See the NTSB report (link on Wikipedia entry). Not all electrical power was lost, but different engines powered different electrical systems. Notably, the "slats disagree" warning and the stickshaker were disabled. Consequently, pilots didn't know that left outboard slats retracted, raising the stall speed on the left wing only (hence the left roll). The FE could've flipped a switch for auxiliary power, but he would have had to swivel his seat & stand up to reach it, so he didn't.
beatlesguru 3 years ago
Not sure about the elctrical power. But the biggest problem here was time and altitude. Between V1 and Vr is the worst time to lose an engine.
But, I dont think they lost ALL power, only some systemts, like the stick-shaker (a stall warning cue.
But, like many accidents, things seem obvious in retrospect.
This is why, for example, the engine out procedure us now v2+15. And why there is redudant LE hydraulics.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
Will you please post the full video?
jgshi 3 years ago
Why did the plane loose it's electrical power? Two engines were remaining so why did they loose all electrical power? And why drained ALL hydraulic fuel away? You can see that only one of three independent hydraulic systems is leaking
showfire 4 years ago
That is because the airplane stall when losing air speed. Normally aircrafts will use at lease 75% of throttle which power up engines for generate enough air lifts to take off.
Donz5885 4 years ago
i know that -_- ... the plane stalled because the slats "moved" in because the hydraulic fuel leaked away ... but my question is why did the cockpit loose all electrical power? 2 engines were remaining to provide electrical power! And why did all the hydraulic fuel drainned away?? You can see on this video that just ONE! of three independent hydraulic system had a whole in it -_- ...
showfire 4 years ago
When the engine blew away, temporary short circuit occur in aircraft. Pilot can recover its system by turn on the small button just beside the air speed autopilot adjustment button. But, they had failed to do so.
Donz5885 4 years ago
Where did you find this info? (Short circuit). And i still dont know why ALL hydraulic fuel leaked away ...
showfire 4 years ago
Can't you see that the whole engine pylon just give away? That consider as major damage on wing and also all its hydraulic lines inside.
Donz5885 4 years ago
I'm not sure but i think at that time the DC10s hydraulic lines dint have shut off valves so if one hydraulic line burst all the fluid leaked out. something like that
Vanadeo 4 years ago
Este accidente lo recuerdo muy bien por las fotos sacadas por el periodico. Realmente no habia nada que hacer por parte de nadie. No entiendo como Amercian Airlines sigue siendo lider a pesar de numerosos accidentes con victimas fatales. Aqui se empeiza a vislumbrar sus terribles fallas. Aramis
napoaramis 4 years ago
I'm glad this video acknowledges that the engine and wing were not visible from the cockpit, so the flight crew had no idea of the extent of the damage. The crew followed engine out procedure and unknowingly stalled the left wing due to loss of hydraulics and electricity. The tower saw the engine fall off and failed to inform the flight crew, although "Oh shit" was probably a very appropriate reaction to such a thing. Given the circumstances, the flight was doomed.
jsmc11 4 years ago
Know something about DC-10s having been a SO on one. Not all hydraulics or electrics were lost. The pilots didn't know what they had. Not only did the engine fail, it was truly lost. They maintained flying speed appropriate to their takeoff configuration, just as they were trained. When the slats retracted, the stall speed of the wing raised sharply above their current flying speed, and it stalled. IF they been faster, had they known, it is theorized they could have returned for a landing.
maxangleofdangle 3 years ago
It was theorized that they could land but during flight simulators (mentioned on the History Channel special on this) it was proven that there was no way they would be able to land because any turn they make they would flip over.
deric8 3 years ago
The crew didn't know what they had. If they had known, kept their speed up, there were enough systems remaining to sort things out and return for a landing. Hindsight is 20/20 but for sure, with added speed, the plane could have continued flying. The adopted procedure industry wide as a result is, if you have any engine failure, keep your existing speed rather than slow back to V2. This still may not be enough.
maxangleofdangle 3 years ago
It was their emergency procedures that caused it to stall. The emergency procedure stated to power engines down to V2 which can stall the plane on takeoff. It wasn`t the pilots fault they did everything right. It was the Emergency Checklist that killed them, Sadly.
UAL4ever 3 years ago
As a follow-up to this a similar situation occured in Amsterdam with El-Al Flt. 1862 when a very similiar situation occured. Everything was fine and he was flying until he tried to land.
deric8 3 years ago
FULL VIDEO PLZ!
kdmq 4 years ago
PHAILcatPILOT.
adamgoncalves 4 years ago