With a name "How the world works" without any real credentials of any sort is already getting off on the wrong foot in terms of not appearing arrogant and already somehow biased in opinion
Then he's selling something on top of it
what a bunch of fucking scammers, didn't get that news anchor job you wanted or something? btw think tankers = still pawns who will give away their ideas to others to benefit from
don't even bother replying because I WONT ever watch any of this bs again
The thing is, he was the Communications Director at CEI before moving on to where he now works, a Media Company and has been doing "How the World Works" prior to going to CEI. Just FYI.
@0HippyHunter0 I don't have a channel that puts out garbage for the stupid and lazy. Lee Doren is trying to make a career out of pure bullshit instead of doing something productive with his brain. You're free to buy his act. I'm free to say you got suckered.
@337noname Trying? Look at the sales numbers on his E-book, I think I was number 12. You are right, you can be as wrong as you want. Thats ok. What you aren't free to do, without getting called on it, is say things like "he's a troll" while you are trolling. That makes you a hypocrite.
Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!! Go to BlackThisOut[dot]com. Get on the moneybomb email list! Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Go to BlackThisOut[dot]com.Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!
Haha. I went to college in Boston of all places, and never ever heard the hippie liberal crap that most college people speak of. Now I know why. Every single course I took was science.
Thanks for explaining that to me, Lee. I honestly didn't know why they didn't try to indoctrinate me. I just thought I was lucky.
@billybassman21 - Nick's show was cancelled and went to syndication a LONG time ago. Though he did make guest appearances on "Laverne and Shirley" from time to time.
@Amy31415 didn't realize there was a litmus test.you understand that the ru paul crowd of neo confederates are a small minority right? why do you think hes running as a republican? because he couldn't run as a libertarian because they dont want him.
The idea of this guy being interviewed for Reason's YouTube channel makes about as much sense as the idea of ME being interviewed for Reason's YouTube channel.
I really appreciate what Lee brings to the youtube political community. Even if you disagree with him, you can certainly appreciate what he brings to the discussion. He's the go to guy for the libertarian/conservative point of view on things (not a hardcore libertarian, but not a flaming neocon either)
HTWW is more or less Lee reading Drudge Report headlines and giving short commentary on it. I used to like it and was subbed to his channel for a long time. I unsubbed him when he began ebegging with paypal links on all his videos to "support his channel." His videos consist of short, off the cuff vlogs with minimal editing. He works for a think tank, wrote this book and is an attorney but was asking for money from his subscribers. He loves to delete comments he disagrees with.
@Dmonk08 I've watched him delete an entire line of dialogue between users, one of which simply advocated for legalization of gay marriage and drugs. He also deleted one of my comments praising his channel, but criticizing his asking users for money to finance his youtube channel, when he's already a youtube partner. If Lee only deletes comments by "trolls," then his definition of troll must be anyone who holds an opinion that's even remotely at odds with his.
@Dmonk08 "fail"? "troll"? Are you 12 or something? I never said he was anti-gay. I said he deleted several users line of dialogue regarding legalization of gay marriage. One of the users had an issue with Lee's video and while other users were discussing it, Lee decided to delete the entire thing. I really don't care if you like his channel or not, I was a fan, but I am no longer. I'm a capitalist and I'm all for profit, but I have a problem watching people on the internet beg for money.
People act like being mad about his censorship suddenly means you must be a far left liberal who deserved to be banned because we must have said something extremely horrible.
That is not the case AT ALL, clearly, as so many like-minded libertarians are pointing out his behavior.
If you correct him, or point out a flaw in what he said, or just say anything that doesn't go along with his point of view exactly, he blocks you and removes your comment. He's a hack.
@chronDiggity Agreed. I remember early on commenting about how I wish I didn't vote McCain/Palin, because of how bad Palin turned out to be and how bad I always felt McCain was and instead should have voted Libertarian as I had planned earlier in 2008. Lee actually tried to correct me that no, I should have voted McCain. I know that the libertarians at Bureaucrash pretty much had a mutiny when he was named Crasher in Chief. It was so bad he stepped down and took another role at CEI.
He also openly admits he voted for Mitt Romney in the last republican primaries, not Ron Paul.
He openly supports the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well.
The dude simply shouldn't appeal to the same people ReasonTV appeals to. Regardless of how he deletes comments and bans anyone who points out errors in his videos, he's not someone any sound-minded libertarian would feel comfortable about cheering on.
@Dmonk08 Holy shit! Please pull Lee Doren's cock out of your mouth, it's unhealthy. He is telling you that he had been subbed to him for a long and time and that he deletes comments and your reply is - "he only deletes and blocks trolls". Are you retarded, ignorant or just in denial?
@PhilosopherGod are we supposed to miss you? are you supposed to convince people that your a regular to reason tv the libertarian bastion of youtube but because mister doren was featured your now gone? be gone you fake phony fraud your fooling no one.your a typical leftist hack with zero arguments."im leaving cause doren is on here"...you never liked libertarian channels ...no ones buying iy...go away mister !This channel is not available.
You think Lee Doren is a truth seeking libertarian like the ones ReasonTV attracts?
Please get your head out of your ass, sir. He's worse than a political hack. He's a wannabe political hack. He's one of the most brainwashed people I've ever seen.
@chronDiggity It is so cheap to just attack someone with no facts, integrity, or foundation. It is much harder to prove what you say. I watch his channel all the time and he does a much better job than say Young Turks.
A little maturity? What do you know about maturity? I've given clear cut examples all over this comment thread as to why Doren is a hack, but you still say I have nothing to back them up. I removed the comment after I saw you replied to something that wasn't like the many other comments I made here, that would have taken you 4 seconds to find.
Yeah, keep replying to comments removed. Maturity.
@chronDiggity You removed it because you are a dipshit. You have given bullshit examples, straight bullshit. I fail to see what I've done as immature, but your comment sure as fuck was. Remember, your high standards only apply to others, you can be as hateful, greedy and ignorant as you want.
Yeah right, pal. I'm a dipshit, and yet everything I pointed out where Lee Doren banned people for corrections can easily be found.
Why don't you go look up how the $278k per job created stat came from. Why don't you go look up the laws about counting money from a home sale as income. The answers are easily found, and when you have found the answers and realize that Lee Doren would BAN YOU for sharing your new knowledge, you'll see why your attacks on me are unwarranted.
@chronDiggity I couldn't care less if Doren bans people. I'm not going to run out and search for information that proves you right. If you want to prove your point you can bring the source here, its REALLY easy. If you can't cite your source then you have to concede your point. Its that easy.
@chronDiggity Doesn't look misleading. Interestingly enough, that "saved or created" standard is complete horseshit. Obama doesn't know if he's shitting or going blind, but some how he knows if he "saved" a job. That is one reason the administration backed off that bullshit symantical nightmare and now says "jobs supported." The point of the stimulus was to create jobs, it failed miserably. It cost WAY too much per job created. You have yet to surprise me.
You're being a stubborn fool. "The point of the stimulus was to create jobs" AMONG OTHER THINGS.
You can't divide the lowest GUESS as to jobs created/saved and divide it against the entire stimulus. It makes absolutely no sense.
In what universe did the stimulus actually cost $278k per job saved or created!?!? How can you not see you're taking the side of misinformation and stupidity?
@chronDiggity Among other things? Thats not what Obama said. He said, "its a stimulus to stimulate the economy." Now the story changes when the accountants get ahold of your crony bs. Obama didn't put out the LOWEST guess, not ever. How much did it cost per job? I'm still waiting for your math.
this literally has been the most pointless conversation I've ever had with anyone. I tell you why $278k per job is misleading, baseless, rooted in bad math, and pointed out why the math is bad, and you think I'm trying to debate whether the stimulus was a good thing or not.
You're still waiting on math because you're a moron. You haven't heard a word I've said. You think this conversation is something it isn't. You are worthless.
@chronDiggity I'll agree, pointless. You're right, I haven't heard a word of math that you've said. Lets hear it: Obama said he was going to create millions of jobs with the stimulus, we lost millions. According to your math hou much did it cost per job created? How much was 'set aside' for the purpose of the bill and how many jobs did that create (or destroy)?
You moron, follow the link I gave you, you can clearly see how much was set aside for that sort of thing. Look at Contracts Grants and Loans. That's the heart of the job stuff. Even if you threw in the tax relief portion, you get nowhere near the 278k per job stat Doren parroted. The dude bans and blocks people who point out ANYTHING like this. All he wants is far right hive-mind idiots such as yourself so the comments get filled with praise and you think more of him.
@chronDiggity If its so easy, you do it. Go right ahead. "Contracts, Grants, and Loans" is the heart of the "job stuff"? WTF? You deserved to be banned. Its obvious to me. Either do the math and post a number or give it up already. This is extremely boring.
Wtf are you talking about? Who said the math was easy? In fact, I've been saying the opposite in a way. The EASY math is what Lee Doren did. The CORRECT math is actually applying some critical thinking to the equation.
"You deserved to be banned" You know, you're right. I deserved to be banned from Lee Doren's videos because I don't fit in with the hive-minded neoconservative republican assholes over there who just lap up anything he says without question.
Now I know what you're thinking: The stimulus was supposed to save and create jobs so it's ok to use the entire sum to divide against, right?
Well wrong. The stimulus did all sorts of things, including paid for entitlements. How does paying entitlements create or save jobs? It doesn't. It maintains entitlement programs people have become dependent on. Over 200 billion was used on that. Why use it in the sum to divide against? To raise the price-per-job, and mislead.
@chronDiggity Thats not what Obama said. He said he was going to get this economy back on its feet. You can't blame Doren for more Obama lies. I'm wicked bored here, so I'll play along. How much of that was supposed to create jobs? How many jobs did it create, and how long did they last? Lets see your math.
If I gave you $100 and told you to get the car's oil changed, get a haircut, and pick up groceries, what sense would it make to say you spent $100 on groceries? If you're siding with Doren, that's exactly what's happening here. Creating/saving jobs was a goal of a portion of the stimulus. I asked you once already, how does paying for entitlements create jobs? Well over $200 billion went to entitlements.
The fact that you asked for MY math shows you aren't understanding this..
@chronDiggity Thats not what the administration said. Entitlements are possibly the fastest way concieved to destroy wealth.
No, asking for your math is a wonderful tool to get you to figure out for yourself what a failure the "stimulus" was. But I guess it wasn't a stimulus, it was some entitlement program/free-money-give-away-but-only-to-Obama-friends/crony steal and spend scheme and maybe create a few jobs bill. What could you possibly be reading that would make you believe this crap?
I literally feel like I'm talking to a crazy person. What are you on? No, seriously, what strong medication are you prescribed that left you this way?
Where was this discussion over how bad the stimulus was? Where was I advocating one way or another whether the stimulus was a good thing? Are you fucking serious with this shit, dude?
When you can see that this isn't a matter of debating the validity of the stimulus, but rather a republican talking point, reply back to me.
@chronDiggity This way? Like believing that the administration should do what it says its doing? "We're creating jobs" is apparently code for "we're expanding entitlements." If Obama had gone to the people and said what you say his bill is for, they would have run him out. He lied. You are helping him lie. I am serious.
Lets go to basics there Mr. Know-It-All: what is the purpose of a bill called "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act" and nicknamed "the stimulus"?
Well isn't that the pot calling the kettle black. You accuse me of helping someone lie, when all I've done is given facts, and all you've done is tried to argue with me over shit I'm not even saying and defend Lee Doren's own lie!
What about that bill's name says "100% jobs"? You are blatantly ignoring entitlements, which can easily fall under that name. Obama's shoving a new bill called the American Jobs Act. Now THAT is a bill you could use this math on (total/guess)
@chronDiggity Entitlements are known as "entitlements." Theres a reason why there are seperate words for those things. I'm sure once this new jobs bill costs us another 2.2 million jobs you'll be on here defending that as "not a jobs bill." The stimulus was, by Obamas words supposed to "get us back to work." No matter how you slice this, it did little to stimulate anything but debt; and likely made our situation worse.
I stopped reading after "you'll be on here defending that"
you're a delusional fool if you think I've been defending the stimulus. The point of the conversation was to show how Doren deleted my comment and banned me after correcting him POLITELY I might add on one of his videos.
Since I feel sorry for you, I'll explain it once more, then I'm done: First of all, I feel the stimulus wasn't the best way to go. Now that I said that, can you stfu about arguing whether the stimulus was good?
The problem is Lee Doren was repeating a nonsensical talking point put out by republicans and meant to mislead people. The talking point said the stimulus cost 278k per job, but they arrived at this figure by counting entitlement spending as "job spending." Got it?
@chronDiggity Gee thanks. We all KNOW it was a horrible choice; good of you to catch up. These talking points aren't nonsensicle, he took what the bill cost and diviided that by how many jobs the administration says it created or "saved." That seems to be a very basic test. Now, to say "well the bill was supposed to be for all kinds of things" prompts the question: then how much went to job creation? And what is that number. End you pathetic insults and show me the numbers; you cant.
What difference does it make if I show you? I already showed you. I gave you a link directly to a breakdown of the spending. You didn't go, so why should I post that link again?
Also, good of me to catch up? Are you seriously still trying to say I ever supported the stimulus or that's what this discussion was over? Good lord you're dumb.
Literally everything I've said to you has been a waste of my time. "Seems to be a very basic test" <~for very simple people.
@chronDiggity You showed me nothing. Lets have it: How much did they spend on "jobs" and how many "jobs" were created. You cant answer the question. Being that the "expert" here can't provide us with a more complex answer (google it doesn't count, son) we'll assume Doren was correct and your point is conceded.
I can look past your imbecilic argumentative dialog and see you're genuinely curious about this stat, and how much it actually costs. Here's a paper from two guys over at Dartmouth:
dartmouth edu/~bsacerdo/Feyrer_Sacerdote_Stimulus_2011_02_08 pdf
You said you wanted correct math, well that paper shows how complicated it actually is, which is why I called you a moron for expecting me to do it on the spot here.
BTW, they found it's less than $100k per job, not $278k. Read it.
@chronDiggity You have got to be kidding me. If you read this and came away with "it cost 100k per job" you need to start at 1st grade and learn to read again. Bu....buuu...bullshit. And I quote: "Overall we find a cost per job between $100,000 and $400,000 depending on our specification." Doren came in at 278K that would be almost exactly that half way mark between these two numbers. Additionally, this estimate works on the administrations numbers of jobs created, which is the high water mark.
"Depending on our specification" doesn't mean you just take the middle number and say THAT'S the answer. They're saying you can look at different individual portions of the stimulus and arrive at a range of numbers between 100-400k.
"On the other hand, support for low income households appear to have been extremely effective
with Keynesian multipliers of over 2 and a cost per job of under $100,000"
Which income bracket do you think NO income from unemployment falls under?
@chronDiggity Which income bracket is $400,000 per job? You realize the private sector could have created jobs for, on average, less than $48k ea? Its like your brain is in suspension.
No matter how you slice it, simply taking the total amount spent and dividing it against the lowest job created estimate isn't viable math. According to that talking point, Obama could have saved like 430 billion by simply cutting a check for 100k out to 2.4 million people. If you believe that, then you're just a partisan hack, not someone who cares about being lied to, and not someone who wants to know the truth about things.
@chronDiggity It seems pretty accurate. Obama could have saved a fucking fortune if he'd just not borrowed the money from China in the first place. It would have been significantly better to just cut checks, there is no debating it.
Yeah except I showed a clear cut example where he banned me for correcting him, and your argument was to list examples of wasteful spending? That wasn't a counter argument, it was just you assuming what I'm saying instead of actually taking the time to read it. You're dumb, and unable to discuss these things.
If someone says the stimulus costs $278,000 per job, then BANS people who show an obvious flaw in the math, they clearly aren't motivated by truth, logic, or reason.
@chronDiggity yes its called disproving your point so viciously that to continue with your idiocy would be a waste of time. absolutely i listed wasteful spending.y.i was showing you how totally moronic your argument was and how anyone with a half a brain wouldn't spend two seconds communicating with you. unfortunately i cant block you on reasons channel but if i could i would have by now.your wasting my time.
@PhilosopherGod first of all gofuckyou'reself mister fake channel...can you read that? was the your/you're spelled correctly? your obviously an obsessed leftist who can not stop flagging and voting down anything that involves lee doren.
2nd hows richard geres asshole?
and lastly unsub already were tired of you.your an unfunny boring lunatic.you add nothing and you are nothing.go the fuck away.no one asked you for yours y...o...u...r...s....blow me...
@PhilosopherGod oh look 4 chan come backs like "u mad?" fucking brilliance...do me a favor and slip into a bowl of aids fuckface....can you read that? did i spell that correctly you cunt?
@PhilosopherGod its beyond pathetic that a 4chan phrase using cunt is obsessed with a youtube personality...do us all a favor mister "This channel is not available!" and roll around in a carpet with magic johnson and razor blades.fuck you.
@thebackbencher666 LMAO 4chan is for nerds like you. And do you speak for this channel? No? Then stfu.
And who is this "we"? If you actually understood the Libertarian philosophy of individualism, you wouldn't have used the phrase "we". Shut the fuck up and go away.
@PhilosopherGod well obviously YOUR right...libertarians can never use the word we...how fucking retarded are you mister "This channel is not available!" ...shut the fuck already..i can see the hanger coming outta your head from when YOUR mom tried to abort you....fuck you.
@PhilosopherGod no your...i said your right you dumb cunt...more 4chan horseshit like pawned and owned...whatever mister "channel is no longer available" coward pussy bitch. omg a libertarian who doesn't think we should all commit suicide and let the jihadists kill us...better then you leftists commie scum who only likes ru because hes anti war...but at least you can look at my channel and see where i stand pussy...mister channel no longer available...jump into a spinning helicopter blade..."we"
@thebackbencher666 Hahah that was a whole lot of retardation. Idiot came back and commented 3 times ahahahha. Yeah u maaaaaaaaad!
And jihadis? Ahahha yeah there are jihadis in Germany, Korea and the other 900 bases we have worldwide. You know where most of the hijackers came from? Saudi, you dumb fucking bitch. You have no clue what you're talking about, STFU. And it's not even a matter of choice, WE CAN'T AFFORD IT, dumb bitch.
@PhilosopherGod the simple ammount of fucktardedness in your posts have to be adressed in more then one response.first you again repeadily love to UUUUUUUUSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEE THIIIIIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSS FOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRMMMMMMMM OOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF EEEEEEEEXXXXXXXPPPPPPPRRRRRRRESSSSSSSSSSSIIIIIION AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH because you should have been a blowjob....
@thebackbencher666 1. For the love of God learn to spell and construct sentences, you retarded fuck.
2. You didn't address anything I said, b/c you don't have anything to justify spending $500 billion/year on the military. That's more than the whole world combined. Every other country seems to doing just fine.
3. This is a LIBERTARIAN channel. Go somewhere else neo-con. Don't you have gays to harass somewhere?
@PhilosopherGod here watch me spell and construct this..get hit by a drunk driver. i have been addressing you.now that you want to discuss real issues im supposed to take you seriously? go fuck your mother. again you HAVE TO DO THIS TO MAKE YOUR POINT BECAUSE YOU ARE A CHILD.LOOK AT ME MA BIG CAP LETTERS. im gonna say this again you pacifist coward fuck reason magazine has distanced themselves from ru paul and his agenda so perhaps your in the wrong place you motherless commie bucket of douche
@PhilosopherGod ahhh more brilliance like " haha" and big cap letters.hey any of you "non interventionist" types who havent been complete morons and who have substantive arguments for your issue please me at my channel...hear hat pussy...my channel not :this channel no longer available you blind sheep troll....thanks folks.please get violated by a bunch of homeless men with aids.
@PhilosopherGod here is an idea.instead of being an anonymous lee doren troll cuntball try making a coherent video stating your arguments without using a 4chan reference like "umad" or "haha" or big cap letters mister "this channel no longer available. you can see my positions and my face and voice all over my channel.you know where i stand and why because im not a coward ball of cunt.
@thebackbencher666 OOOOOOOOOOOOOR I don't have time to waste making videos on youtube. You have like 20 views, no one watches you b/c you're a neo-con piece of shit LOL.
@PhilosopherGod BIG CAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPP LETTER ARGUMENT followed by the obligatory "LOL"...ugh...you gotta love a guy whose dedicated to being a pansy pacifist so much that he spends his time bashing mister doren on youtube then actually complains about people who are actually contributing...hey dipshit if i got 1 view thats more then you because you have zero.did you just bash youtubers who make videos on a youtube form? your mothers sucks donkeys for quarters. fuck yourself tardcuntball.
Oh i was just pointing out how obnoxious you've been on the comments page, but decided to remove the comment as it's not worth my time to argue with you over such stupidity.
You can reply to removed comments all you want though, that makes sense. What would you like to argue about? Wanna argue about how to argue when arguing on how to argue?
@chronDiggity no ill leave that up to the left and its kantiouns.i know what you posted and i know why you removed it.it shows up in my responses even though you erased it.
@chronDiggity no you tried to make me look like a dunce by pointing out i was using big block capital letters and "hahahah".then you realized i was quoting someone and your post made no sense so you removed it.i have only been nasty to nasty people sir.
@chronDiggitybecause you deleted it because yo realized i was quoting him and not using it myself.are we arguing about arguing again you annoying boob? hes not gonna call me a retard or whatever name he likes and get away with it.maybe you two are used to people letting you walk all over them but i guarantee you im not that guy.i love how you and him have such trouble with real arguments.look at my videos...do i just sit there and cal people cunts all day?no.why are real issues so difficult 4 u
@chronDiggity no im lambasting him for not having any arguments. he doesn't have any.he finally decided to address a real issue but only after bashing me for not fitting into his mold of what a "true libertarian" was supposed to be and only a couple of posts in.i reminded him that reason magazine (and might i add cato) have distanced themselves from ru paul and im telling you i have no problem with arguing on the issues but im not gonna do it with people who dont do the same.
What is the real issue? The guy said he was unsubbing from reasonTV and look how you responded to him. You responded to him, and you did so like a complete prick.
It seems to me there's a new breed of libertarian, and it comes in the form of mindless neocons like Lee Doren CALLING themselves libertarian.
@chronDiggity he was a cunt from the get go with no channel and no contribution. other then him being vile anyone who uses the term necon is a fucking pacifist cuntwad. include yourself in that if you like. would you decry doren's supposed neoconism (read jew) when reason has distanced themselves from paul? why claim that this is the straw that broke the camels back.he shoulda stopped watching reason a long time ago.no he was not being polite at all and so neither was i.
he wasn't even talking to you, so how was he impolite to you?
Also, David Harsanyi is the only one at Reason I've seen do as you describe. Who else has distanced themselves from Ron Paul?
If Reason thinks someone like Lee Doren is the new poster child of libertarianism, then they can definitely expect a LOT of people to start unsubscribing from them. Lee Doren is a REPUBLICAN. There's no debate over that.
@chronDiggity really? why would you defend brain dead over there? do you consider hahaha raflmo u mad worthy of defense.i knew who he was i smelled him and dealt with him appropriately.keep defending this bafoon enjoy your new friend.is your zealousness for western defeat so strong that you to will unsubscribe due to an interview with mister doren? no one said he was a poster child for anything and he is far to fiscally responsible to be labeled a republican.
@chronDiggity i thought yo didnt want to argue about arguing and thats all youve done...so tiring....i didnt like him i made a judgement call i was right the end.
@chronDiggity no one cares.his purpose was to bash lee doren plain and simple.if you dont like "neocons " or jews or have nonsense arguments against the past administrations fp policies (ie small group of jews led us into war) then perhaps you should unsubscribe as well.i say again they (reason) and the cato institute have distanced themselves from paul and his ilk.
WTF? If I don't like neocons I should unsubscribe? Who the fuck are you to speak for ReasonTV like that? They've been very outspoken on many issues neoconservative defend like dogs. Drug war? War on terror? Patriot Act? RING A BELL?
"if you don't like jews." Typical anti-Semitic argument. No different than a lib screaming racism. Anti-zionist is not anti-Semitic. I have no problem with Judaism.
Maybe you're right though. Maybe reason IS going downhill.
@PhilosopherGod by neocon dont you really mean jew? srry cuntballtardboy with zero brains im a reagan hawk learn your terms you pansy pacifist. by videos that no one watches do you mean the 24,000 i got for the hicks video,or the 13,000 for the general petreus video,or the 12,000 for the limbaugh vs gore,its called hit the "by most viewd" button you walking failed abortion.try my old channel youngmarklevin....over 30,000 views.
@thebackbencher666 Haha you're a Reagan hawk? Reagan's self-admitted biggest mistake was going into Lebanon, and you know what he did? He pulled out. You know what else he did? He endorsed Ron Paul - calling him an "outstanding leader fighting for stronger national defense".
And LMAO bragging to me about his 30 views on youtube ahaha. Wow! Get a life. Yeah that explains why you suck Lee Doren's cock, maybe to get some views.
@PhilosopherGod ahhhh more big cap letter arguments followed by 4 chan ,lamo's like a 12 year old girl.no person who knows what his sisters cunt juice tastes like off his dads dick, you dont get to be a cuntball and then decide to tackle the issues.you will be treated as the retarded cuntball you are.
can you not read? hit the "most viewed" button dummy...fuckin...ahhh...id rather hit myself with hammer then try to converse with mister extra chromosome over here.fuck you.
the host is being quite condescending here.
ImperialArmour 3 months ago
@ImperialArmour How is he being condescending?
MelvinThe42 1 day ago
Lee doren is a propagandist himself
TheEthanwashere 3 months ago
lol @ the title. fuck lee doren
TheEthanwashere 3 months ago
btw anyone who takes everything an Attorney says is equally fuckin' retarded
they're literally trained to makes ANY point they defend SEEM correct despite actual validity of the claim, that's their JOB
again , Fuck Off
The7thCircuit 4 months ago
With a name "How the world works" without any real credentials of any sort is already getting off on the wrong foot in terms of not appearing arrogant and already somehow biased in opinion
Then he's selling something on top of it
what a bunch of fucking scammers, didn't get that news anchor job you wanted or something? btw think tankers = still pawns who will give away their ideas to others to benefit from
don't even bother replying because I WONT ever watch any of this bs again
TYT= U
The7thCircuit 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hi everybody, just letting you know that kkilo34 is a coward and a fag who runs from the truth
rasheedzee 4 months ago
The thing is, he was the Communications Director at CEI before moving on to where he now works, a Media Company and has been doing "How the World Works" prior to going to CEI. Just FYI.
wesleywildcat84 4 months ago
Lee Doren blocks people who disagree with his spin. He's troll and nothing more.
337noname 4 months ago
@337noname And you are what?
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0 Intelligent enough not be fooled by the likes of Lee Doren.
337noname 4 months ago
@337noname Aren't you trolling videos about him? And posting about how he's a troll?
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0 I don't have a channel that puts out garbage for the stupid and lazy. Lee Doren is trying to make a career out of pure bullshit instead of doing something productive with his brain. You're free to buy his act. I'm free to say you got suckered.
337noname 4 months ago
@337noname Trying? Look at the sales numbers on his E-book, I think I was number 12. You are right, you can be as wrong as you want. Thats ok. What you aren't free to do, without getting called on it, is say things like "he's a troll" while you are trolling. That makes you a hypocrite.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0 Well then, thanks for all the attention sucker.
337noname 4 months ago
@337noname what are you, a woman?
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0 Just someone LMAO @ how clueless you are.
337noname 4 months ago
@337noname I may not know a lot, but I do know you're a hypocrite.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!! Go to BlackThisOut[dot]com. Get on the moneybomb email list! Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Go to BlackThisOut[dot]com.Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!
whippoorwillss 4 months ago
Nick is hot.
starrychloe 4 months ago
@starrychloe I'd rub those nipples through that leather jacket.
longlivecrow 4 months ago in playlist More videos from ReasonTV
Haha. I went to college in Boston of all places, and never ever heard the hippie liberal crap that most college people speak of. Now I know why. Every single course I took was science.
Thanks for explaining that to me, Lee. I honestly didn't know why they didn't try to indoctrinate me. I just thought I was lucky.
blogegog 4 months ago
Why doesn't Nick and/or Lee have their own show on Fox News by now?!?
billybassman21 4 months ago
@billybassman21 - Nick's show was cancelled and went to syndication a LONG time ago. Though he did make guest appearances on "Laverne and Shirley" from time to time.
thomaserossi 4 months ago
@ConservativeMBA
He's rabidly pro-war. That's a pretty neoconservative position. He's also against freedom and for the Patriot Act.
Amy31415 4 months ago
@Amy31415 didn't realize there was a litmus test.you understand that the ru paul crowd of neo confederates are a small minority right? why do you think hes running as a republican? because he couldn't run as a libertarian because they dont want him.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
Lee Doren is a little fascist who can't handle any criticism and bans people left and right. He's definitely got the neocon infection as well.
He's a creep. Why is Reason interviewing this weasel and getting him more press? Oh yeah--Reason, the DC libertarians, are kinda neocon themselves.
Amy31415 4 months ago
The idea of this guy being interviewed for Reason's YouTube channel makes about as much sense as the idea of ME being interviewed for Reason's YouTube channel.
IsaacBaranoff 4 months ago
this guy is a douche
oJKBo 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@oJKBo - He's a fucking genius. Even for a conservative.
HexTest 4 months ago
@oJKBo Butthurt LOL!
QuartuvLarry 4 months ago
My two favorite YouTube libertarians in the same video
rockinandout 4 months ago 3
@rockinandout
Good lord, Doren is hardly a libertarian.
Amy31415 4 months ago
@Amy31415 - you're so indoctrinated you're actually stupid.
thomaserossi 4 months ago
@rockinandout
Doren is most definitely not a libertarian.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this people is what an unbiased interview looks like
aminizle 4 months ago
Go Lee!
bsharker 4 months ago
It's easy to think like Lee Doren. You just have to stick your head up your ass.
jacksfilms1 4 months ago 5
Youtube follow crossover! Ahhh!
TuesdaysThursdays 4 months ago
Go Lee!
bweazel 4 months ago
LOL.
Nick Looks like he is a giant sitting next to Lee.
I am sure it is just the camera angle but it is funny anyway.
karozans 4 months ago
I really appreciate what Lee brings to the youtube political community. Even if you disagree with him, you can certainly appreciate what he brings to the discussion. He's the go to guy for the libertarian/conservative point of view on things (not a hardcore libertarian, but not a flaming neocon either)
asphyxiafeeling 4 months ago
@asphyxiafeeling
Except that Lee's a flaming dipshit.
Amy31415 4 months ago
@Amy31415
I'll have to respectfully disagree with your "assessment"
asphyxiafeeling 4 months ago
Lee looks so small and the interviewer looks like a giant. lol
manor1730 4 months ago
YEAH LEE!
dirksilver 4 months ago
HTWW is more or less Lee reading Drudge Report headlines and giving short commentary on it. I used to like it and was subbed to his channel for a long time. I unsubbed him when he began ebegging with paypal links on all his videos to "support his channel." His videos consist of short, off the cuff vlogs with minimal editing. He works for a think tank, wrote this book and is an attorney but was asking for money from his subscribers. He loves to delete comments he disagrees with.
Thorbie 4 months ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@Thorbie he only deletes and blocks trolls.
Dmonk08 4 months ago
@Dmonk08 I've watched him delete an entire line of dialogue between users, one of which simply advocated for legalization of gay marriage and drugs. He also deleted one of my comments praising his channel, but criticizing his asking users for money to finance his youtube channel, when he's already a youtube partner. If Lee only deletes comments by "trolls," then his definition of troll must be anyone who holds an opinion that's even remotely at odds with his.
Thorbie 4 months ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
@Thorbie Thats interesting because he isnt anti gays...... if you watched his videos you'd know that lol Fail troll is fail, i'm done with you.
Dmonk08 4 months ago
@Dmonk08 "fail"? "troll"? Are you 12 or something? I never said he was anti-gay. I said he deleted several users line of dialogue regarding legalization of gay marriage. One of the users had an issue with Lee's video and while other users were discussing it, Lee decided to delete the entire thing. I really don't care if you like his channel or not, I was a fan, but I am no longer. I'm a capitalist and I'm all for profit, but I have a problem watching people on the internet beg for money.
Thorbie 4 months ago 3
@Thorbie
People act like being mad about his censorship suddenly means you must be a far left liberal who deserved to be banned because we must have said something extremely horrible.
That is not the case AT ALL, clearly, as so many like-minded libertarians are pointing out his behavior.
If you correct him, or point out a flaw in what he said, or just say anything that doesn't go along with his point of view exactly, he blocks you and removes your comment. He's a hack.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity Agreed. I remember early on commenting about how I wish I didn't vote McCain/Palin, because of how bad Palin turned out to be and how bad I always felt McCain was and instead should have voted Libertarian as I had planned earlier in 2008. Lee actually tried to correct me that no, I should have voted McCain. I know that the libertarians at Bureaucrash pretty much had a mutiny when he was named Crasher in Chief. It was so bad he stepped down and took another role at CEI.
Thorbie 4 months ago
@Thorbie
He also openly admits he voted for Mitt Romney in the last republican primaries, not Ron Paul.
He openly supports the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well.
The dude simply shouldn't appeal to the same people ReasonTV appeals to. Regardless of how he deletes comments and bans anyone who points out errors in his videos, he's not someone any sound-minded libertarian would feel comfortable about cheering on.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Dmonk08 Holy shit! Please pull Lee Doren's cock out of your mouth, it's unhealthy. He is telling you that he had been subbed to him for a long and time and that he deletes comments and your reply is - "he only deletes and blocks trolls". Are you retarded, ignorant or just in denial?
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago 7
@PhilosopherGod well your obviously a cunt so im glad he blocked you..cunt.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@Dmonk08 Then Lee should block himself!
jesushatesyoutoo 4 months ago
I like Lee but he's a bit of a Neo-Con. I wish he would stop reading Michele Malkin and look into RON PAUL.
SuperSneakySteve 4 months ago 8
@SuperSneakySteve: Oh GAWDS! I wish you cultist would all just SHUT UP about Wrong Paul!
VictorLepanto 4 months ago
@SuperSneakySteve Well, Doren is more of a conservative, but I like him more than I like Gilepsie.
truevoice08 4 months ago
@SuperSneakySteve So this guy reads Malkin and that makes him a Neocon?
superlucci 4 months ago
@superlucci
No--he agrees with Malkin, that's what makes him a neocon. His own "beliefs."
Amy31415 4 months ago
@Amy31415 Show me where he supports the Patriot Act and is for this war
superlucci 4 months ago
@superlucci
You know I can't post links on YouTube. Google it.
Amy31415 4 months ago
@Amy31415 You can always not put the dot com in the link.
And no, you make baseless accusations, the onus is on you to prove it
superlucci 4 months ago
@SuperSneakySteve
Ron Paul is also led by his beliefs. Not sure which Paul you're talking about.
He's not a true Libertarian.... which is fine with me. I know I am going to get hammered for this on here but I don't want one.
mcoop221 4 months ago
@SuperSneakySteve A Bit of a Neo-con? He is a smuck and that if you challenge him on is videos he will block you. He is a fascist!
jesushatesyoutoo 4 months ago
Lee Doran is a douchebag. I'm very disappointed that Reason would give any credibility to this cretin.
novaphoenix70 4 months ago
I used to subscribe to How The World Works, but, despite having logical views on the issues, Lee is just too hard to listen to.
hannas1234 4 months ago
Great interview!
HeisenbergHyopthesis 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice to see Lee on ReasonTV :)
tboladave 4 months ago 44
@tboladave Ain't though?
mothafraker 4 months ago
I am unsubbing ReasonTv putting this hack on!
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod are we supposed to miss you? are you supposed to convince people that your a regular to reason tv the libertarian bastion of youtube but because mister doren was featured your now gone? be gone you fake phony fraud your fooling no one.your a typical leftist hack with zero arguments."im leaving cause doren is on here"...you never liked libertarian channels ...no ones buying iy...go away mister !This channel is not available.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666
You think Lee Doren is a truth seeking libertarian like the ones ReasonTV attracts?
Please get your head out of your ass, sir. He's worse than a political hack. He's a wannabe political hack. He's one of the most brainwashed people I've ever seen.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity It is so cheap to just attack someone with no facts, integrity, or foundation. It is much harder to prove what you say. I watch his channel all the time and he does a much better job than say Young Turks.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
Comment removed
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity Oooh boy, you sure got me. A little maturity goes a long way.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
You're replying to a comment that's been removed.
A little maturity? What do you know about maturity? I've given clear cut examples all over this comment thread as to why Doren is a hack, but you still say I have nothing to back them up. I removed the comment after I saw you replied to something that wasn't like the many other comments I made here, that would have taken you 4 seconds to find.
Yeah, keep replying to comments removed. Maturity.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity You removed it because you are a dipshit. You have given bullshit examples, straight bullshit. I fail to see what I've done as immature, but your comment sure as fuck was. Remember, your high standards only apply to others, you can be as hateful, greedy and ignorant as you want.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
Yeah right, pal. I'm a dipshit, and yet everything I pointed out where Lee Doren banned people for corrections can easily be found.
Why don't you go look up how the $278k per job created stat came from. Why don't you go look up the laws about counting money from a home sale as income. The answers are easily found, and when you have found the answers and realize that Lee Doren would BAN YOU for sharing your new knowledge, you'll see why your attacks on me are unwarranted.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity I couldn't care less if Doren bans people. I'm not going to run out and search for information that proves you right. If you want to prove your point you can bring the source here, its REALLY easy. If you can't cite your source then you have to concede your point. Its that easy.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago 2
@0HippyHunter0
Ok I'll explain the stimulus $278k per job stat that was total bullshit.
Go here: recovery gov/Transparency/fundingoverview/Pages/fundingbreakdown aspx
They show what portions of the stimulus went where.
Now here's the talking point at a website that even explains the math newstalk870 am/obama-economists-stimulus-cost-278k-per-job/
666 Billion(the entire stimulus) divided by 2.4 million (the lowest jobs saved/created estimate) = $277,500.
The math is obviously misleading.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity Doesn't look misleading. Interestingly enough, that "saved or created" standard is complete horseshit. Obama doesn't know if he's shitting or going blind, but some how he knows if he "saved" a job. That is one reason the administration backed off that bullshit symantical nightmare and now says "jobs supported." The point of the stimulus was to create jobs, it failed miserably. It cost WAY too much per job created. You have yet to surprise me.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
You're being a stubborn fool. "The point of the stimulus was to create jobs" AMONG OTHER THINGS.
You can't divide the lowest GUESS as to jobs created/saved and divide it against the entire stimulus. It makes absolutely no sense.
In what universe did the stimulus actually cost $278k per job saved or created!?!? How can you not see you're taking the side of misinformation and stupidity?
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity Among other things? Thats not what Obama said. He said, "its a stimulus to stimulate the economy." Now the story changes when the accountants get ahold of your crony bs. Obama didn't put out the LOWEST guess, not ever. How much did it cost per job? I'm still waiting for your math.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
this literally has been the most pointless conversation I've ever had with anyone. I tell you why $278k per job is misleading, baseless, rooted in bad math, and pointed out why the math is bad, and you think I'm trying to debate whether the stimulus was a good thing or not.
You're still waiting on math because you're a moron. You haven't heard a word I've said. You think this conversation is something it isn't. You are worthless.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity I'll agree, pointless. You're right, I haven't heard a word of math that you've said. Lets hear it: Obama said he was going to create millions of jobs with the stimulus, we lost millions. According to your math hou much did it cost per job created? How much was 'set aside' for the purpose of the bill and how many jobs did that create (or destroy)?
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
You moron, follow the link I gave you, you can clearly see how much was set aside for that sort of thing. Look at Contracts Grants and Loans. That's the heart of the job stuff. Even if you threw in the tax relief portion, you get nowhere near the 278k per job stat Doren parroted. The dude bans and blocks people who point out ANYTHING like this. All he wants is far right hive-mind idiots such as yourself so the comments get filled with praise and you think more of him.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity If its so easy, you do it. Go right ahead. "Contracts, Grants, and Loans" is the heart of the "job stuff"? WTF? You deserved to be banned. Its obvious to me. Either do the math and post a number or give it up already. This is extremely boring.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
Wtf are you talking about? Who said the math was easy? In fact, I've been saying the opposite in a way. The EASY math is what Lee Doren did. The CORRECT math is actually applying some critical thinking to the equation.
"You deserved to be banned" You know, you're right. I deserved to be banned from Lee Doren's videos because I don't fit in with the hive-minded neoconservative republican assholes over there who just lap up anything he says without question.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
Now I know what you're thinking: The stimulus was supposed to save and create jobs so it's ok to use the entire sum to divide against, right?
Well wrong. The stimulus did all sorts of things, including paid for entitlements. How does paying entitlements create or save jobs? It doesn't. It maintains entitlement programs people have become dependent on. Over 200 billion was used on that. Why use it in the sum to divide against? To raise the price-per-job, and mislead.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity Thats not what Obama said. He said he was going to get this economy back on its feet. You can't blame Doren for more Obama lies. I'm wicked bored here, so I'll play along. How much of that was supposed to create jobs? How many jobs did it create, and how long did they last? Lets see your math.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
If I gave you $100 and told you to get the car's oil changed, get a haircut, and pick up groceries, what sense would it make to say you spent $100 on groceries? If you're siding with Doren, that's exactly what's happening here. Creating/saving jobs was a goal of a portion of the stimulus. I asked you once already, how does paying for entitlements create jobs? Well over $200 billion went to entitlements.
The fact that you asked for MY math shows you aren't understanding this..
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity Thats not what the administration said. Entitlements are possibly the fastest way concieved to destroy wealth.
No, asking for your math is a wonderful tool to get you to figure out for yourself what a failure the "stimulus" was. But I guess it wasn't a stimulus, it was some entitlement program/free-money-give-away-but-only-to-Obama-friends/crony steal and spend scheme and maybe create a few jobs bill. What could you possibly be reading that would make you believe this crap?
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
I literally feel like I'm talking to a crazy person. What are you on? No, seriously, what strong medication are you prescribed that left you this way?
Where was this discussion over how bad the stimulus was? Where was I advocating one way or another whether the stimulus was a good thing? Are you fucking serious with this shit, dude?
When you can see that this isn't a matter of debating the validity of the stimulus, but rather a republican talking point, reply back to me.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity This way? Like believing that the administration should do what it says its doing? "We're creating jobs" is apparently code for "we're expanding entitlements." If Obama had gone to the people and said what you say his bill is for, they would have run him out. He lied. You are helping him lie. I am serious.
Lets go to basics there Mr. Know-It-All: what is the purpose of a bill called "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act" and nicknamed "the stimulus"?
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
Well isn't that the pot calling the kettle black. You accuse me of helping someone lie, when all I've done is given facts, and all you've done is tried to argue with me over shit I'm not even saying and defend Lee Doren's own lie!
What about that bill's name says "100% jobs"? You are blatantly ignoring entitlements, which can easily fall under that name. Obama's shoving a new bill called the American Jobs Act. Now THAT is a bill you could use this math on (total/guess)
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity Entitlements are known as "entitlements." Theres a reason why there are seperate words for those things. I'm sure once this new jobs bill costs us another 2.2 million jobs you'll be on here defending that as "not a jobs bill." The stimulus was, by Obamas words supposed to "get us back to work." No matter how you slice this, it did little to stimulate anything but debt; and likely made our situation worse.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
I stopped reading after "you'll be on here defending that"
you're a delusional fool if you think I've been defending the stimulus. The point of the conversation was to show how Doren deleted my comment and banned me after correcting him POLITELY I might add on one of his videos.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
Since I feel sorry for you, I'll explain it once more, then I'm done: First of all, I feel the stimulus wasn't the best way to go. Now that I said that, can you stfu about arguing whether the stimulus was good?
The problem is Lee Doren was repeating a nonsensical talking point put out by republicans and meant to mislead people. The talking point said the stimulus cost 278k per job, but they arrived at this figure by counting entitlement spending as "job spending." Got it?
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity Gee thanks. We all KNOW it was a horrible choice; good of you to catch up. These talking points aren't nonsensicle, he took what the bill cost and diviided that by how many jobs the administration says it created or "saved." That seems to be a very basic test. Now, to say "well the bill was supposed to be for all kinds of things" prompts the question: then how much went to job creation? And what is that number. End you pathetic insults and show me the numbers; you cant.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
What difference does it make if I show you? I already showed you. I gave you a link directly to a breakdown of the spending. You didn't go, so why should I post that link again?
Also, good of me to catch up? Are you seriously still trying to say I ever supported the stimulus or that's what this discussion was over? Good lord you're dumb.
Literally everything I've said to you has been a waste of my time. "Seems to be a very basic test" <~for very simple people.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity You showed me nothing. Lets have it: How much did they spend on "jobs" and how many "jobs" were created. You cant answer the question. Being that the "expert" here can't provide us with a more complex answer (google it doesn't count, son) we'll assume Doren was correct and your point is conceded.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
I can look past your imbecilic argumentative dialog and see you're genuinely curious about this stat, and how much it actually costs. Here's a paper from two guys over at Dartmouth:
dartmouth edu/~bsacerdo/Feyrer_Sacerdote_Stimulus_2011_02_08 pdf
You said you wanted correct math, well that paper shows how complicated it actually is, which is why I called you a moron for expecting me to do it on the spot here.
BTW, they found it's less than $100k per job, not $278k. Read it.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity You have got to be kidding me. If you read this and came away with "it cost 100k per job" you need to start at 1st grade and learn to read again. Bu....buuu...bullshit. And I quote: "Overall we find a cost per job between $100,000 and $400,000 depending on our specification." Doren came in at 278K that would be almost exactly that half way mark between these two numbers. Additionally, this estimate works on the administrations numbers of jobs created, which is the high water mark.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
"Depending on our specification" doesn't mean you just take the middle number and say THAT'S the answer. They're saying you can look at different individual portions of the stimulus and arrive at a range of numbers between 100-400k.
"On the other hand, support for low income households appear to have been extremely effective
with Keynesian multipliers of over 2 and a cost per job of under $100,000"
Which income bracket do you think NO income from unemployment falls under?
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity Which income bracket is $400,000 per job? You realize the private sector could have created jobs for, on average, less than $48k ea? Its like your brain is in suspension.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
No matter how you slice it, simply taking the total amount spent and dividing it against the lowest job created estimate isn't viable math. According to that talking point, Obama could have saved like 430 billion by simply cutting a check for 100k out to 2.4 million people. If you believe that, then you're just a partisan hack, not someone who cares about being lied to, and not someone who wants to know the truth about things.
You belong at Doren's vids, not here at Reason's
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity It seems pretty accurate. Obama could have saved a fucking fortune if he'd just not borrowed the money from China in the first place. It would have been significantly better to just cut checks, there is no debating it.
0HippyHunter0 4 months ago
@0HippyHunter0
He's a democrat, what do you expect. They promise all sorts of things that no sane person would buy when they're broke.
chronDiggity 4 months ago 4
@chronDiggity no no no ...your obviously right with great arguments like that...
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666
Yeah except I showed a clear cut example where he banned me for correcting him, and your argument was to list examples of wasteful spending? That wasn't a counter argument, it was just you assuming what I'm saying instead of actually taking the time to read it. You're dumb, and unable to discuss these things.
If someone says the stimulus costs $278,000 per job, then BANS people who show an obvious flaw in the math, they clearly aren't motivated by truth, logic, or reason.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity yes its called disproving your point so viciously that to continue with your idiocy would be a waste of time. absolutely i listed wasteful spending.y.i was showing you how totally moronic your argument was and how anyone with a half a brain wouldn't spend two seconds communicating with you. unfortunately i cant block you on reasons channel but if i could i would have by now.your wasting my time.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 First off it's spelled "you're". Hard to take you seriously when you can't even construct simple sentences.
2nd, if Doren is a Libertarian, then I am a flying gerbil.
And lastly stfu. I will sub or unsub any channel I want to, no one asked your opinion.
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod first of all gofuckyou'reself mister fake channel...can you read that? was the your/you're spelled correctly? your obviously an obsessed leftist who can not stop flagging and voting down anything that involves lee doren.
2nd hows richard geres asshole?
and lastly unsub already were tired of you.your an unfunny boring lunatic.you add nothing and you are nothing.go the fuck away.no one asked you for yours y...o...u...r...s....blow me...
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 Haha u mad faggot? Please at least learn to spell you retarded fuck.
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod oh look 4 chan come backs like "u mad?" fucking brilliance...do me a favor and slip into a bowl of aids fuckface....can you read that? did i spell that correctly you cunt?
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 It's not a "comeback" moron. It's beyond pathetic that a grown man (which I presume you're), can't even spell basic words.
Stop sucking Lee's cock, get an education, stop pretending to be a Libertarian and fuck off!
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod its beyond pathetic that a 4chan phrase using cunt is obsessed with a youtube personality...do us all a favor mister "This channel is not available!" and roll around in a carpet with magic johnson and razor blades.fuck you.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 LMAO 4chan is for nerds like you. And do you speak for this channel? No? Then stfu.
And who is this "we"? If you actually understood the Libertarian philosophy of individualism, you wouldn't have used the phrase "we". Shut the fuck up and go away.
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod well obviously YOUR right...libertarians can never use the word we...how fucking retarded are you mister "This channel is not available!" ...shut the fuck already..i can see the hanger coming outta your head from when YOUR mom tried to abort you....fuck you.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 Yeah you're REAAAAAAALLY mad this time. Dumb bitch keeps getting owned haha.
And you have a video bashing Ron Paul, calling him Ru Paul. You sir, are no Libertarian. Your jig is up faggot, fuck off!
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod no your...i said your right you dumb cunt...more 4chan horseshit like pawned and owned...whatever mister "channel is no longer available" coward pussy bitch. omg a libertarian who doesn't think we should all commit suicide and let the jihadists kill us...better then you leftists commie scum who only likes ru because hes anti war...but at least you can look at my channel and see where i stand pussy...mister channel no longer available...jump into a spinning helicopter blade..."we"
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 Hahah that was a whole lot of retardation. Idiot came back and commented 3 times ahahahha. Yeah u maaaaaaaaad!
And jihadis? Ahahha yeah there are jihadis in Germany, Korea and the other 900 bases we have worldwide. You know where most of the hijackers came from? Saudi, you dumb fucking bitch. You have no clue what you're talking about, STFU. And it's not even a matter of choice, WE CAN'T AFFORD IT, dumb bitch.
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod the simple ammount of fucktardedness in your posts have to be adressed in more then one response.first you again repeadily love to UUUUUUUUSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEE THIIIIIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSS FOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRMMMMMMMM OOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF EEEEEEEEXXXXXXXPPPPPPPRRRRRRRESSSSSSSSSSSIIIIIION AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH because you should have been a blowjob....
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 1. For the love of God learn to spell and construct sentences, you retarded fuck.
2. You didn't address anything I said, b/c you don't have anything to justify spending $500 billion/year on the military. That's more than the whole world combined. Every other country seems to doing just fine.
3. This is a LIBERTARIAN channel. Go somewhere else neo-con. Don't you have gays to harass somewhere?
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod here watch me spell and construct this..get hit by a drunk driver. i have been addressing you.now that you want to discuss real issues im supposed to take you seriously? go fuck your mother. again you HAVE TO DO THIS TO MAKE YOUR POINT BECAUSE YOU ARE A CHILD.LOOK AT ME MA BIG CAP LETTERS. im gonna say this again you pacifist coward fuck reason magazine has distanced themselves from ru paul and his agenda so perhaps your in the wrong place you motherless commie bucket of douche
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 Haha faggot u mad!
You don't have an argument, because you're an illiterate piece of shit.
And non-interventionism is not pacifism, IDIOT.
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod ahhh more brilliance like " haha" and big cap letters.hey any of you "non interventionist" types who havent been complete morons and who have substantive arguments for your issue please me at my channel...hear hat pussy...my channel not :this channel no longer available you blind sheep troll....thanks folks.please get violated by a bunch of homeless men with aids.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod more 4chan? more "umad" really?
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod here is an idea.instead of being an anonymous lee doren troll cuntball try making a coherent video stating your arguments without using a 4chan reference like "umad" or "haha" or big cap letters mister "this channel no longer available. you can see my positions and my face and voice all over my channel.you know where i stand and why because im not a coward ball of cunt.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 OOOOOOOOOOOOOR I don't have time to waste making videos on youtube. You have like 20 views, no one watches you b/c you're a neo-con piece of shit LOL.
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod BIG CAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPP LETTER ARGUMENT followed by the obligatory "LOL"...ugh...you gotta love a guy whose dedicated to being a pansy pacifist so much that he spends his time bashing mister doren on youtube then actually complains about people who are actually contributing...hey dipshit if i got 1 view thats more then you because you have zero.did you just bash youtubers who make videos on a youtube form? your mothers sucks donkeys for quarters. fuck yourself tardcuntball.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
Comment removed
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity what bitch...
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666
Oh i was just pointing out how obnoxious you've been on the comments page, but decided to remove the comment as it's not worth my time to argue with you over such stupidity.
You can reply to removed comments all you want though, that makes sense. What would you like to argue about? Wanna argue about how to argue when arguing on how to argue?
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity no ill leave that up to the left and its kantiouns.i know what you posted and i know why you removed it.it shows up in my responses even though you erased it.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666
Two replies to make the same point?
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity thats you response? your post counting? and you accused me of wanting argue about how to argue when arguing on how to argue?
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@chronDiggity no you tried to make me look like a dunce by pointing out i was using big block capital letters and "hahahah".then you realized i was quoting someone and your post made no sense so you removed it.i have only been nasty to nasty people sir.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666
dude, you're lambasting the guy for using caps and being immature, but right after that quote you tell him he should have been a blow job?
The point was to show you're just as obnoxious, but again, I DELETED THE COMMENT, and yet you still want to argue for the sake of arguing.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
Comment removed
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chronDiggitybecause you deleted it because yo realized i was quoting him and not using it myself.are we arguing about arguing again you annoying boob? hes not gonna call me a retard or whatever name he likes and get away with it.maybe you two are used to people letting you walk all over them but i guarantee you im not that guy.i love how you and him have such trouble with real arguments.look at my videos...do i just sit there and cal people cunts all day?no.why are real issues so difficult 4 u
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@chronDiggity no im lambasting him for not having any arguments. he doesn't have any.he finally decided to address a real issue but only after bashing me for not fitting into his mold of what a "true libertarian" was supposed to be and only a couple of posts in.i reminded him that reason magazine (and might i add cato) have distanced themselves from ru paul and im telling you i have no problem with arguing on the issues but im not gonna do it with people who dont do the same.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666
What is the real issue? The guy said he was unsubbing from reasonTV and look how you responded to him. You responded to him, and you did so like a complete prick.
It seems to me there's a new breed of libertarian, and it comes in the form of mindless neocons like Lee Doren CALLING themselves libertarian.
All the guy did was say he was unsubbing, bro.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity he was a cunt from the get go with no channel and no contribution. other then him being vile anyone who uses the term necon is a fucking pacifist cuntwad. include yourself in that if you like. would you decry doren's supposed neoconism (read jew) when reason has distanced themselves from paul? why claim that this is the straw that broke the camels back.he shoulda stopped watching reason a long time ago.no he was not being polite at all and so neither was i.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666
he wasn't even talking to you, so how was he impolite to you?
Also, David Harsanyi is the only one at Reason I've seen do as you describe. Who else has distanced themselves from Ron Paul?
If Reason thinks someone like Lee Doren is the new poster child of libertarianism, then they can definitely expect a LOT of people to start unsubscribing from them. Lee Doren is a REPUBLICAN. There's no debate over that.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity really? why would you defend brain dead over there? do you consider hahaha raflmo u mad worthy of defense.i knew who he was i smelled him and dealt with him appropriately.keep defending this bafoon enjoy your new friend.is your zealousness for western defeat so strong that you to will unsubscribe due to an interview with mister doren? no one said he was a poster child for anything and he is far to fiscally responsible to be labeled a republican.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@chronDiggity i thought yo didnt want to argue about arguing and thats all youve done...so tiring....i didnt like him i made a judgement call i was right the end.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@chronDiggity he wasnt impolite to me. he was a jerk and a troll.just look at his channel.....yeah thought so.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@chronDiggity no one cares.his purpose was to bash lee doren plain and simple.if you dont like "neocons " or jews or have nonsense arguments against the past administrations fp policies (ie small group of jews led us into war) then perhaps you should unsubscribe as well.i say again they (reason) and the cato institute have distanced themselves from paul and his ilk.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666
WTF? If I don't like neocons I should unsubscribe? Who the fuck are you to speak for ReasonTV like that? They've been very outspoken on many issues neoconservative defend like dogs. Drug war? War on terror? Patriot Act? RING A BELL?
"if you don't like jews." Typical anti-Semitic argument. No different than a lib screaming racism. Anti-zionist is not anti-Semitic. I have no problem with Judaism.
Maybe you're right though. Maybe reason IS going downhill.
chronDiggity 4 months ago
@chronDiggity are jews running the banks and did they get us into war?
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chronDiggity do jews run the banks and did they get us into war? yes or no.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod by neocon dont you really mean jew? srry cuntballtardboy with zero brains im a reagan hawk learn your terms you pansy pacifist. by videos that no one watches do you mean the 24,000 i got for the hicks video,or the 13,000 for the general petreus video,or the 12,000 for the limbaugh vs gore,its called hit the "by most viewd" button you walking failed abortion.try my old channel youngmarklevin....over 30,000 views.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 Haha you're a Reagan hawk? Reagan's self-admitted biggest mistake was going into Lebanon, and you know what he did? He pulled out. You know what else he did? He endorsed Ron Paul - calling him an "outstanding leader fighting for stronger national defense".
And LMAO bragging to me about his 30 views on youtube ahaha. Wow! Get a life. Yeah that explains why you suck Lee Doren's cock, maybe to get some views.
You have been owned over and over again.
U mad? Yeah u maaaaaaaaaad!
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod ahhhh more big cap letter arguments followed by 4 chan ,lamo's like a 12 year old girl.no person who knows what his sisters cunt juice tastes like off his dads dick, you dont get to be a cuntball and then decide to tackle the issues.you will be treated as the retarded cuntball you are.
can you not read? hit the "most viewed" button dummy...fuckin...ahhh...id rather hit myself with hammer then try to converse with mister extra chromosome over here.fuck you.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 Hahaha poor little retard got thoroughly owned even by the own words of Reagan. Hahah yeah u mad!
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod yeah thats what i thought....toaster plus bathtub..you figure it out cuntball.
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@thebackbencher666 Haha yeah you're done dumb shit. Reagan endorsed Ron Paul. What do say about that 'Reagan hawk'? LMAO fucking retard!
PhilosopherGod 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod ahhh..more haha's and lmao's i see...catch cancer tardcuntball...
thebackbencher666 4 months ago
@PhilosopherGod hahaha LMAO u madhahaha LMAO u mad hahaha LMAO u mad