@opterios Great I'm not totally crazy. I told my friend the same thing, and she is a record deal concert pianist in Portland. She said that it's alright to think this, and in her opinion sometimes the music chooses certain people. Ok, then why was I chosen by Paganini and Daft Punk at the same time? Heh.
This recording brings back memories......decades ago, when I was in high school I used to listen to this very recording everyday and fell in teen love with a girl named Judy Ertel.
@AllegroDemolish If people underate Ashkenazy they are stupid ignorant fools. He is one of the geatest pianists ever. He actually recorded and performed practically the whole piano repertoire.His Rachmaninov is absolutely outstanding. I heard him play incredibly brilliantly live a number of times.
I know everyone has their favourite Rach 3 rendition, but this one (Haitink/Ashkenazy?) is my favourite. For me this is like a reference performance of this great concerto. Ashkenazy is nothing short of incredible - effortless playing and good sense of line and proportion, and the closing 2-3 minutes of the work take my breath away each time I listen to it. The development in the 1st movement is for me also really exciting to listen to.
@doggtaggz Very true, and very well-put! Some of the comments in YouTube utterly amaze me, with personal attacks and brutal language over a difference in appreciation of MUSIC! Haitink I enjoy thoroughly, Ashkenazy I've never cared for much; and my Rach 3 "reference" performance is actually Martha Argerich. That is rather odd even to me, as Horowitz was THE standard while I was a student. I even attended his Golden Jubilee concert.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Maestro Ashkenazy, with all due respect, you should concentrate on either the piano or on conducting, but not both, in which you are strictly second rate.
No he is not. Bronfman is the best with rach and specially with rach 3, now i know every one is goin to shout on me because its the page of ashkenazy but we all know the true - Bronfman is the best.
I read on a book by musicologist Piero Rattalino that Horowitz was not satisfied with his own performance of some of the etudes, which were not at "Horowitz level" according to him; therefore he never played in public, nor recorded some of the etudes. About Rubi I don't know.
Because they felt they couldn´t do justice to all of them. Incidentally, that´s what Hoffman and Rachmaninoff also said. And they believed that nobody else could play them all equally well either.
I love the sound he makes with the piano, but I want to ask you something, TO ALL YOUTUBE USERS: Do you think his sound is forced?? ugly?? strepitoso?? with too strengh?? because many people say me that...
Ashkenazy is one of my favourite pianists for his poetic sensitivity in rachmaninov, there is no bravura playing as extravagant as Lang Lang here, the only slight weakness is in the big ossia cadenza where he seems to draw it out for too long but overall a good performance of the 3rd Concerto
Vladimir Ashkenazy is a man of wonderful musical taste. When I heard him live several times, he had wonderful musical flair, lovely touch, amazing enery and incredible technique.
Great music!! My favorite definitve recording of the Rach 3 is Gutierrez's.
1979Musicfan 3 months ago
What about Rachmaninoff himself being the standard reference for the 3rd concerto. There is a recording from 1939. People forget about it? :d
xakoviski 4 months ago
he plays like an angel- definative rach.
dlfunky1 5 months ago
God I love this piece! It moves me to another sphere! Takes me to heaven....
CMA7412 6 months ago
Spettacolare! Davvero una splendida esecuzione , grande ashkenazy!!!!
topolinik 7 months ago
2 dislikes? Were they listening to something else and then rated this by accident???
kaimartucci 10 months ago 2
Ne serait-ce pas la version use in the movie "Shine"?
josajpnide 1 year ago
I strongly agree with doggtaggz and appreciate the detailed comments.
shogl 1 year ago
@cattleman6420012000 you should hear him conducting the symphonic pieces. It's like he really gets inside this music, it's his.
Ashkenazy + Rachmaninov = WIN
sefard777 1 year ago
@sefard777 This is good
concerto35 9 months ago
This is my favourite interpretation of the Rach 3. The point. The others are variations...even if excellently played...
kiaragre 1 year ago
I want to listen to this for all eternity.....
jcsorez 1 year ago
I will be hated... but I think Ash's versions are more soulful then Rach's original recordings of his own music.
poochy320 1 year ago 3
@poochy320 Well....I actually agree....! :P
opterios 1 year ago
@opterios Great I'm not totally crazy. I told my friend the same thing, and she is a record deal concert pianist in Portland. She said that it's alright to think this, and in her opinion sometimes the music chooses certain people. Ok, then why was I chosen by Paganini and Daft Punk at the same time? Heh.
poochy320 1 year ago
between the modern interpreters, this one is my favourite rach3
davlak2 1 year ago
This recording brings back memories......decades ago, when I was in high school I used to listen to this very recording everyday and fell in teen love with a girl named Judy Ertel.
freeqwerqwer 2 years ago 3
ashkenazy is one of the most underrated pianist.
hes so great, but its sad tat ppl have so much prejudice.
AllegroDemolish 2 years ago
@AllegroDemolish If people underate Ashkenazy they are stupid ignorant fools. He is one of the geatest pianists ever. He actually recorded and performed practically the whole piano repertoire.His Rachmaninov is absolutely outstanding. I heard him play incredibly brilliantly live a number of times.
cattleman6420012000 2 years ago 3
@AllegroDemolish i wasnt aware he was underrated everyone knows he's one of the best.
dlfunky1 5 months ago
I like Ashkenazy, too - despite the music snobs' prejudices
BrookHornblower 2 years ago 4
I know everyone has their favourite Rach 3 rendition, but this one (Haitink/Ashkenazy?) is my favourite. For me this is like a reference performance of this great concerto. Ashkenazy is nothing short of incredible - effortless playing and good sense of line and proportion, and the closing 2-3 minutes of the work take my breath away each time I listen to it. The development in the 1st movement is for me also really exciting to listen to.
doggtaggz 2 years ago 10
I agree with you.
I have this CD. I bought it at 1993. Because the shops hadn't it I order it. 417239 was its code, I remember the code after all these years.
The reference performance on RACH 3 !
mpakos18473 2 years ago 2
@doggtaggz: Mine is Ashkenazy, London Symphony Orchestra conducted by André Previn.
JLFelixMendelssohnB 1 year ago
@doggtaggz Well said! This is my favourite version too.
wnxg4nd4lf 11 months ago
@doggtaggz Very true, and very well-put! Some of the comments in YouTube utterly amaze me, with personal attacks and brutal language over a difference in appreciation of MUSIC! Haitink I enjoy thoroughly, Ashkenazy I've never cared for much; and my Rach 3 "reference" performance is actually Martha Argerich. That is rather odd even to me, as Horowitz was THE standard while I was a student. I even attended his Golden Jubilee concert.
UlfenDaddy 5 months ago
This is very nice, but you should also watch Bronfman play it with the Viennese.
ThePro911 2 years ago
tegan unos dìas de paciencia.Subirè un video de este concierto que creo que es no superado por Vladimir.Mùsica e imagen´Buenos Aires.
jorgeliebermann 2 years ago
Vladimir Ashkenazy plays all Rachmaninov fantastically and with deep understanding.
cattleman6420012000 2 years ago 4
This is very fine.. but, for me, Jorge Bolet's version is still unmatched!
cosmicjazzer 2 years ago
Ashkenazy and Rachmaninoff are just perfect match!
pleasantblue 2 years ago 3
which movement is this? btw THIS IS CLASS!
bomberchicken 2 years ago 2
First movement.
johnalt16 2 years ago
thatnk you very much.
(will the person who minused my comment please tell me why? that is if he/she sees this comment
bomberchicken 2 years ago 3
It was not me but i am guessing it was because you showed lack of experience when asking the question "which movement is this? ".
Jordan.
parkourjordz 2 years ago
Ashkenazy does it differently (not better) than anyone...but he owns this concerto.
pianonine 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No, he just borrowed it from Horowitz. ....
And Horowitz is pretty mad about it and wants it back!
vova47 2 years ago
Vladimir is so special when playing Rachmaninov. He has achieved so much in his life. An enormous repertoire! I truly have so much respect for him.
cattleman6420012000 3 years ago 3
Ho questo su un CD, la prima versione completa di questo concerto che io ho ascoltato
umegghju 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Maestro Ashkenazy, with all due respect, you should concentrate on either the piano or on conducting, but not both, in which you are strictly second rate.
GIONMARO 3 years ago
Oi - Ashkenazy is amazing, thankyouverymuch.
misscalendar 3 years ago 2
Only 2:45 mins???
ghostpianist 3 years ago 2
Vladimir Ashkenazy was always so special with Rachmaninov.
cattleman6420012000 3 years ago 13
@cattleman6420012000
No he is not. Bronfman is the best with rach and specially with rach 3, now i know every one is goin to shout on me because its the page of ashkenazy but we all know the true - Bronfman is the best.
MrRaphaelBM 7 months ago
you folks need to listen to horowitzs' 1951 recording with reiner it blows em all away argerich, watts, bronfam etc.
pianofat 3 years ago
Sorry Horowitz's messy and empty playing always leaves me cold. Richter, Hough and Hamelin are all super virtuosic and muscial perfection.
pianonine 2 years ago
Horowitz empty playing?
vdj0077 2 years ago
why no full version?
batigoallover 3 years ago
0:54 is poor:(
loveebara 3 years ago
agree pity..
alucoq 3 years ago
I love this interpretation!
HiyaHolaHey 3 years ago 2
do you really like the way he plays at 0:32-0:39?
Cavaradossi1981 3 years ago
noone plays rach like vlad. this is the definitive version of this wonderful concerto.
a phenomenal pianist and genuis conductor is there nothing this great man cant do?
dlfunky 3 years ago
probably my favorite interpretation of this piece
Marcuys 3 years ago
best present my mom ever gave me, was this CD/
Listened to is over 5000 times.
joaharu 3 years ago
Rubinstein and Horowitz--the two pianistic giants of our age and neither ever recorded the complete Chopin etudes. I wonder why?
JoeTownley 3 years ago
I read on a book by musicologist Piero Rattalino that Horowitz was not satisfied with his own performance of some of the etudes, which were not at "Horowitz level" according to him; therefore he never played in public, nor recorded some of the etudes. About Rubi I don't know.
voolare 3 years ago
Because they felt they couldn´t do justice to all of them. Incidentally, that´s what Hoffman and Rachmaninoff also said. And they believed that nobody else could play them all equally well either.
vova47 2 years ago
I thought Ashkenazy had direkted this concert according to the picture...(Haitink is similar to old Ashkenazy)
simsa21 3 years ago
No simsa21, this is definitely Ashkenazy playing in the very early 1970s. I personally love his playing of Rachmaninov.
cattleman6420012000 3 years ago
第一楽章の「カデンッア」が凄いんだけど! まさに超絶技巧!
URAMESI41 3 years ago
i don't get it, i have a cd with a different version, a lot slower. did he recorded the concerto twice?
minasgekos 3 years ago
yeap
4ngry4nus 3 years ago
The Ashkenazy version of Rach3 with LSO under Previn is wonderful, specially the first movement, the most russian style.
If you can hear the Rach1 in same version, please hear, is too beautiful.
ArturoAlejandroS 3 years ago
UNder Previn was amazing. That Cd is the best CD i have ever. It is worth millions to me.
joaharu 3 years ago 4
Is really a marvel.Thanks to God I have.
Life is not the same withouth this CD.
ArturoAlejandroS 3 years ago 2
I agree. I listen to it so much I'm practically married to it.
misscalendar 3 years ago
I love the sound he makes with the piano, but I want to ask you something, TO ALL YOUTUBE USERS: Do you think his sound is forced?? ugly?? strepitoso?? with too strengh?? because many people say me that...
nazhiitoxx 3 years ago
He did better on this one than the one that is most sold
4ngry4nus 3 years ago
Ashkenazy is one of my favourite pianists for his poetic sensitivity in rachmaninov, there is no bravura playing as extravagant as Lang Lang here, the only slight weakness is in the big ossia cadenza where he seems to draw it out for too long but overall a good performance of the 3rd Concerto
TheGreatRichter 3 years ago 2
there is so much things he add. :) and i like it.
q8pianist 3 years ago
ashkenazy isn't like michelangeli but he's so great pianist specially regards about the touch and technique
appassionatodipiano 3 years ago
Better than Michelangeli.Like Horowitz.
ArturoAlejandroS 3 years ago
michelangeli did not recor this as far as I know. He recorded n4 in a memorable way.
voolare 3 years ago 3
Yes,his recording of rach4 is a marvel.I like very much Orozco too.
This recording is wonderful.Ashkenazy is a great pianist and conductor.He is also good as Horowitz was.
In number 3 I recomend you a recording not well known,but sure you will enjoy.Naum Grubert and
Rotterdam Phillarmonic under Valery Gergiev.
This recording is excellent.Greetings.
ArturoAlejandroS 3 years ago
Vladimir Ashkenazy is a man of wonderful musical taste. When I heard him live several times, he had wonderful musical flair, lovely touch, amazing enery and incredible technique.
cattleman6420012000 3 years ago 2
This is fantastic. I am such a big fan of Vladimir Ashkenazy.thank you so much for putting this on youtube.
cattleman6420012000 3 years ago 2