"Allah is - Al Khaliq" (The Creator) "Allah is - Al Bari" (The Evolver)
For the Muslim there is no need for separation between religion and science. It is understood from the Quran, revealed over 1,400 years ago, that there is both; "Creation" and "Evolution." And in both instances, it is only Allah who is "Able to do all things."
Allah has explained how He created everything in the universe and brought all life out of water. He created humans from earth (not monkeys)
The people in this video really don't understand the theory of evolution. And how is science changing over time a bad thing? Are you suppossed to keep teachingthe wrong thing whenevidence has shown its incorrect? That is why science is great. Scientist will continually search for evidence and base their theories onwhat theevidence supports. Its also precisely the reason religion should not enter into science. Religion is dogmatic, if evidence is found which contradicts the reli text its ignored.
Allah tells us He is Al-Bari, (The Shaper or Evolver) but once again, this does not mean He has a need to bring about each individual life form all from one kind. Actually, while reading the Quran you learn He has brought many types and shapes and sizes as He Wills. Changes within species occur even as quickly as one or two seasons, not even taking a whole year, much less millions as was supposed by Darwin.
[Quran 18:51] I called them not to witness the creation of the heavens and the earth, nor (even) their own creation: nor is it for helpers such as Me to take as lead (men) astray!
No matter how similar we are to apes, but we cannot be transformed from a substandard animal !! Its common sense. Where are the fossils of intermediatery stages ??
Allah has created us and given us so much, yet we are so careless concerning His Right to be worshipped exclusively and deny the Day of Judgment wherein we will all be asked concerning His Generosity.
Nay! But (it is because) you do not treat orphans with kindness and generosity.
And you do not encourage feeding of the poor!
And you devour inheritance with greed,
And you love wealth with abounding love! [Noble Quran 89:17-20]
Evidence for Evolution ERVs are lingering remnants of failed viral infection which occurred in an ancestor's sex cell and got propagated in its offspring. The viral insertion site is completely random and finding one in the same location in two individuals indicates they each had that same ancestor. humans and chimps share 98,000 ERVs locations in common. What other conclusion can one come to but evolution.
We share such a large portion of our DNA with chimpanzees, being around a 97 or 98 percent similarity.
In the Qur'an, it often says man was created in stages, but also it speaks of the creation of human being through the story of Adam and Eve and the formation of man from the earth (clay). In a way, Islam supports both evolution and creation... However, evidence shows the distinct evolutionary trend of human beings, having a common ancestor with earlier primates
Allah has explained how He created everything in the universe and brought all life out of water. He created humans from earth (not monkeys) and there is no need to attempt fabrications of "links" to the animal world in Islam.
i am sorry, i don't know that much about evolution but even i know this video is crap. this reeks of Creationist propaganda. science is about continuously researching and studying a hypothesis, evolution has went under thousands of tests by countless scientists ever since Darwin introduced the idea. so are you going to believe a few creationists, who want to indoctrinate and limit scientific understanding or 150 years of evidence to support evolution.
The only words that have never changed is the word of Allah - The Quran. Allah was their when humans were made and he was their when the universe came into existence. Therefore we can take Allah's words above all as true and factual.
No matter how similar we are to apes, but we cannot be transformed from a substandard animal !! Its common sense. Where are the fossils of intermediatery stages ??
the whole idea of animals evolving into another is just insane!!!!i mean this might happen in pokemon world but in reality?come on!do you really accept this as a scientific thought,they claim that life accidentally appeared on earth and that human accidentally evolved from apes,everything to them is just accidentally,just to deny the truth about allah,while the complexity in nature shows us a fact of a creator
anyways thanks brother wallid,and may allah guide us all to the right path
Im glad you have found your god.. I have not studied allah or many religions and its hard to believe just 1 is correct if any.... I am a strong believer in a creator though :) God bless
Anyone interested in truly understanding whether evolution existed or not should read Julian Barbour's book 'The End of Time'. Barbour is a physicist who characterizes time differently than the traditional Newtonian time. He also refutes that evolution ever existed, simply because time as we know it never existed. This is not a pro-creationist view, just a fascinating view on apce-time which is akin to Eastern Vedantic philosophy.
Bible say we are all mistake because a dirt man and his rib woman ate from a magical tree because a talking snake told them to do so!!! MY GRANDFATHER WAS NOT A MORON THAT BELIEVE WHAT TALKING SNAKE SAY TO HIM!!!
DNA proves evolution. ERVs are lingering remnants of failed viral infection, which occurred in an ancestor's sex cell and got propagated in its offspring. The viral insertion site is completely random and finding one in the same location in two individuals indicates they each had that same ancestor. Humans and chimps have 98,000 ERV locations in common. Common ancestor?
There is no DNA research pointing to a connection between apes and humans as was supposed by the scientists and those who had financed them over the years. In fact, the barnyard pig is closer to humans in many aspects, than a monkey or a gorilla. Consider the fact, doctors use the skin from pigs to replace needed tissue on burn victims and the famous movie actor, John Wayne had a pig's heart valve installed in his own heart in a 1977 operation to save his life.
where to start ... first of all we are descended from apes not monkeys. secondly it happened over millions of years, not since your grandfather. We are not mistakes. Evolution by definition cannot make a mistake as only the fittest survive. i suggest you look at the evidence for evolution...rather than doing the intellectual equivalent of covering your ears and shouting whenever you're presented with scientific fact
it is difficult to find transitional fossils of the birds that had defective wings because the mutation was not very successful. this mutation would prove to be non beneficial to the animals survival so the trait would die off. thats why its hard to find those in betweens.
The West assumes that all living creatures are their own lords, work in their own name and for their own pleasure, and that their only aim in life is to survive. It does not see the universal mutual helping among them, as established by their Creator. Plants help animals, and animals help humanity. But it sees even this as conflict and contention, and preaches that life consists of conflict even though all food particles or atoms help nourish the bodys cells.
Nobody disagrees with the fact that man's life upon this planet changes and evolves from one state to another. This evolution takes a wide range in some areas and takes a narrower range in others. The largest scale of evolution covers areas that man uses, such as food, clothing,transportation, lodging, arms, machines and so forth. Islam neither reffises evolution which includes knowledge, wisdom, truth and goodness,
nor does it accept evolution which includes in its process deviance, delinquency and failure. It confronts everything with the Book which Allah has Revealed with truth and justice.
THIS VIDEO IS SO OLD THAT IT'S OUT OF DATE AND RUBBISH... UGHHH!!!
If you're gonna believe in the bible because YOU FEAR SOME GOD OUT THERE then do so!! but don't spread this nonesense..
LOL
WE BELIEVE IN FACTS AND IN STUDIES AND NOT BECAUSE SOME MAGICAL BOOK THAT JUST APPEARED OUT OF NOWHERE and NO HISTORY of Whosoever the "IMAGINATIVE" writer is says that we should believe..
In the most simple way to understand how God is real. Think about this, If evolution is the key to understanding why we are here. Then why is Israel and Jarusalem still so important to the world and the U.S.? Why does the U.S. spend 1.3 trillion dollors in supporting Israels military? And why has the U.S. spent so much time protecting all 80% of what they own in Jarusalem?
Archaeopteryx is thought to be a transition between reptiles and birds. (crit) There are no unambiguous transitional fossils. Archaeopteryx was thought to be a transition between reptile and bird because of its teeth and the claws on its wings. The fact is some fossil birds had teeth, and some didn't. Some reptiles have teeth, and some don't. Some mammals have teeth, and some don't. As far as claws on its wings, there are birds living today that have claws on their wings.
And Allah has Created every animal from water; of them are some creeping on their bellies; some walk on two legs; and some on four. Allah Creates what He wills: for sure Allah has Power over all things.
dont argue with creationist you and i both know they are wrong but in an argument with theist they set the rules for what they accept as "evidence" it will all just boil down to them saying simply your wrong. to prove evolution to them we have to find a transitional fossil. it takes really specific circumstances to even create a normal fossil let alone the one we need. i like how creationist want solid physical proof despite there religion being in faith lol
if there was a firetruck outside your house with blairing sirens that made your ears ring but you couldnt see it with your eyes would you athiests believe its there? yes of course you would. even if somone said there is nothing outside you would still believe its there. why then can you not accept Gods work and his ever present existance? why then must you spit in His face and deny creation. ask yourself, do you look like a rock? thats where your pathetic theroy tells you we came from.
In the Qur'an, people are asked to look around them for the signs of Allah in the natural world. The balance of the world, the rhythms of life, are "signs for those who would believe." The universe is in perfect order: the orbits of the planets, the cycles of life and death, the seasons of the year, the mountains and the rivers, the mysteries of the human body. This order and balance are not haphazard nor random. The world, and everything in it, has been created with a perfect plan, by Allah
(Ratings are disabled! How immediately surprising)
Revealing your 1 star intentions! How Evotypically latent minded
Like a true Athevolutionist monopolizer of logic, reasoning & intelligence, u brilliantly foresaw that your intention revealing comment demonstrates exactly why Creationists must disable ratings. You demonstrated this even while you were criticizing the neutral, harmless disabling act that differs greatly from your 1 star, censoring intentions
Ha Ha, Evo Simianites are the ones with the attitude that Christianity must be suppressed or divorcee's, gays, prostitutes etc. are all going to get stoned to death. Oh yea, just like it always used to happen during most of U.S. history.
Talk about a total Apetard. You posted a comment in which you "criticized" the disabling of ratings. Now you talk as if it disabled you from posting criticisms
Yet, you're still atrociously audacious enough to say -
"You're right, I DO have a monopoly on logic"
You're forgetting that Monopoly money isn't real either.
(Again, portmanteaus aren't funny anymore - you think you're Robin Williams? - I can tell you think you're being funny here - Do you think this is clever? - You practicing for open mic night?)
That's just the way it always seems when you're on the receiving end of an ass tearing torrent of terrible tongue lashings
Gee, I won't be able to plagiarize that one at the youth group. Maybe you'll time share your open mic night with me?
Hey Ragu face, You know of any good eye openers? I'll have to wake up the tough crowd after they fell to sleep when their tomatoes & their fun ran out
You don't have to be so shameless about it. Its unnecessary to revealingly describe yourself since all intelligent Creationists already know that a explanatorily unsupported, mere, alleger assertion is usually presented by one who's been mislead and in turn, misleads with a condescendingly minimal, presumptuous attribution.
"This is not evolution! Evolutionists should know better." Uhm, no, you don't get to say what evolution is, (because you'll just make up crazy shit that no one in their right mind would believe) the evolutionists do. The makers of this video have severely misunderstood just about everything about evolution. For one thing, EVERY ANIMAL that ever lived and reproduced is a transitional form. But if that doesn't do it for you, wiki Tiktaalik.
Since we all know that bronze age story books were fabrications of tyrannically bronzed socialist governments & since evo is obviously evidentially presumable, then it can only be discovered that all uncreated creatures are transcendentally transitional intermediary link-like creatures.
{But if that doesn't do it for you, wiki Tiktaalik}
Personally, what really does it for me is wanki Dikandlik
Stay tuned, for more "Spanking Answers to Stupendously Stupid Cretins"
evolution's falsifiable status. If ever they should gain even an inkling of understanding, then evo would be unfalsifiable. Simply because Creationists would be convinced & there would be none left to bear unfalsifiable witness against evolution.
{EVERY ANIMAL that ever lived and reproduced is a transitional form}
Heeeeey men to that. oops sorry, I mean, "ape-like creatures to that". Another Creationist misunderstanding is regarding the scientific methods of discovering evidence for a theory
Precisely adjusted fecal matter such as pig toothed, ape-like creatures, 4 legged whales, artistically, commonly descended embryos and "Lucy By Some Guy With Grinders"
{The makers of this video have severely misunderstood just about everything about evolution}
Of course they have! For if they had not, then evolution might absurdly be deemed unfalsifiable? It's only the expectedly dependable and perpetual misunderstanding of Creationists that can continue to maintain
{Uhm, no, you don't get to say what evolution is, because you'll just make up crazy shit that no one in their right mind would believe}
Certainly, only evolutionists should get to say what is evolution. Since they'll only present perfectly sound defecations that no one in their left mind wouldn't believe
we have tons of transitional forms. i guess you're just not willing to drop your preconceived notion that god did it instantly to even research it and look up the available fossil evidence.
WHERE is the evidence?There is none.There is no such evidence that one species transforms into another different species.THERE IS NO EVIDENCE.
The viewers of this video cannot see it, but the poster of this video has stopped responding to me in channel and is sending me private messages talking about god and claiming the existence of more scientific lies..
Without ever addressing the lies stated in this very video.
Get your own house in order first, wallidjan. You're making false claims that you know you cannot address, you're desperate to change the subject to religion even though you claim to be addressing science.
People who believe in evolution have been brainwashed. Their main problem is not the arguments for and against evolution and creation. Their problem is they can't bring yourself to reject evolution, because they have already rejected God. Humans have a big mental fault. They are not able to admit they were wrong. Therefore, they are trapped in their previous decision of rejecting God.
You are deluded in thinking that evolution is an atheist perspective. What do you say about the mass of christians who also accept it?
The fact is that when there are more scientists who think the holocaust never happened than those that disbelieve in evolution, you probably need to stop and question why that it. It's FAR more probable that instead of the entire world being wrong, it's you who is wrong.
Spain was ruled by Muslims under the banner of Islam for over 700 years. By the 15th century of the Gregorian calendar the ruler-ship of Islam had been seated in Spain and Muslims had established centers of learning which commanded respect all over the known world at that time. There were no "Dark Ages" such the rest of Europe experienced for the Muslims in Spain and those who lived there with them.
In January of 1492 Muslim Spain capitulated to Catholic Rome under King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella. By July of the same year, Muslims were instrumental in helping navigate Christopher Columbus to the Caribbean South of Florida. It was, moreover, with the help of Muslim navigators and their inventions that Magellan was able to traverse the Cape of Good Hope, and Da Gamma and Columbus had Muslim navigators on board their ships.
"People who believe in evolution have been brainwashed. Their main problem is not the arguments for and against evolution and creation. Their problem is they can't bring yourself to reject evolution, because they have already rejected God."
wrong. i base my acceptance of evolution upon the evidence for it. and i deject god due to the overwhelming LACK of evidence to support it.
"Their main problem is not the arguments for and against evolution and creation"
Of course not, their arguments are correct. You know this, you cannot address them. You can only dodge them and try to shift the subject back to religion.
Once again. This video says there are no transitional fossils. There are many known to science.
How do you resolve this conflict, other than running to read a holy book?
The popular media often portrays the creation vs. evolution debate as science vs. religion, with creation being religious and evolution being scientific. Unfortunately, if you don't agree with this label, you too are labeled. Regardless of whether you're a creationist or an evolutionist, if you disagree with the stereotype, you're condemned and "exposed" as a religious fanatic who is secretly trying to pass religion off as science or,
even worse, trying to disprove science in order to redeem a ridiculous, unscientific, religious worldview. The fact is neither model of origins has been established beyond a reasonable doubt (otherwise, the theory of evolution wouldn't be called the "theory" of evolution). Whether we like to admit it or not, those of us who subscribe to the theory of evolution do so by faith. And while the recognition of design in biology may have theological implications, it is not based upon religious premise.
"even worse, trying to disprove science in order to redeem a ridiculous, unscientific, religious worldview."
Okay then, so you're ready to address a real question that is easily answered, right?
Are there transitional fossils? Does this video lie?
I keep trying to talk about basic scientific facts, and you keep trying to swerve into theology. I'm not interested in theology. This video makes clear claims regarding facts in the material world.
"otherwise, the theory of evolution wouldn't be called the "theory" of evolution."
You know that it's still called the "atomic theory" right? Even though we know that atoms exist? Or that it's still called the "heliocentric theory" even though we know the sun is the center of our solar system? A theory is not some rung on a ladder where "fact" is the highest, it's an explanatory device and the fact that you don't know this is evidence of your staggeringly comical ignorance.
a frisbee, but like a homerun baseball. BTW, the artistic, embryonic pig tooth people lied to you, Copernicus was on our side
A fossil doesn't have its head back like that because someone "rung" its neck & whacked it with a ladder. Its because they drowned....... in the great deluge! The fact that you don't know this is evidence of your staggering, drunken monkey status
OK, so they're all still called theories. But there's still one slight difference. Other theories are supported & validated by empiricism. Evo theory is supported by the democratic consensus of the numerously common, ordinarily mediocre many. While being rejected by the uncommonly extraordinary, radiantly stellar, brilliant few.
Atomic theory - I am... therefor atomic.
Heliocentric - Only Evotards talk about a flat earth. Creationists never do, since we know it doesn't fly around the sun like
Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his "Theory of Evolution." Well, these transitional links have never been found. We only find individual species. Evolutionists try to form these individual species into a link according to similar major features, such as wings or four legs, but this simply proves the Theory of Evolution to be a fraud.
"Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his "Theory of Evolution."
NO he did not. The BS is often repeated by creationists. The complete works of can be found at Dawin Online so you can check for yourself. In fact in Origin (Ch. 11) he was a pains to point out why the paucity of fossil evidence then available was to be expected and why it did not cause problem for the theory of evolution.
"Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his "Theory of Evolution." Well, these transitional links have never been found."
ummmm wrong.,,
we have tons of transitional forms. i guess you're just not willing to drop your preconceived notion that god did it instantly to even research it and look up the available fossil evidence.
on top of the mass amounts of fossil evidence we also now have DNA evidence. but again i guess you're not open enough to honestly research this topic, so maybe you weren't aware.
if you don't believe in evolution, please never take another antibiotic when you are sick. antibiotics were developed using our knowledge of evolution to engineer antibiotic viruses to fight viruses negative to our health.
without our knowledge of evolution, non of that would be possible.
Evidence for Evolution - Observed Natural Selection
(Survival of the fittest): (ex) Darwin's proposed mechanism for evolutionary change is observed in nature. (crit) Natural selection serves as a means of conservation, not one of creation. It explains survival of a species, not arrival of a species. Here's an illustration: You work in a car factory. Your job is quality control - make sure the cars work like they are supposed to.
You kick the tires and slam the doors, drive the cars around, etc. You identify and remove defects. How long would it take for this selection process to turn one of those cars into an airplane naturally over time? It won't happen. "Natural selection may have a stabilizing effect, but it does not promote speciation [the arrival of a new species]. It is not a creative force as many people have suggested." (Daniel Brooks "A downward Slope to Greater Diversity," Science, Vol. 217, 24 September 1982)
So, while you're sitting there telling me that no transitional fossils exist another one has been discovered. It's called Puijila darwini, and it's a transitional form of extant seals.
Oops.. what's that you say? Only humans have transitional fossils? Wrong, I say. We certainly have a lot of transitional ape fossils because of the interest in human ancestry, but if you'd bother to look you'd find plenty for other animals as well.
Once again. This video lies. I've asked you to respond to it and you cannot. MANY transitional forms are known to science. You cannot get out of it by simply denying that transitional forms can exist, so therefore anything that looks like them is something else. You're desperately rationalizing away the information that contradicts what you need to believe is true.
Evolution claim they have tons of evidence mutations occur and this is genetic evidence that supports Darwinian Evolution.
There is a ton of evidence that mutations occur - but a mutation is a change to an existing gene and mutations never result in actually adding a gene.
We have explained that if Evolution works, organisms have to have a way to add a gene, because an organism has to increase the number of genes in its genome in order to advance to a more complex organism.
Mutating is not a way for any organism to add a gene. A single gene could mutate forever but it would never change the gene count.
Evolutionists claim we evolved from the simplest form of bacterial life to ever more complex forms of life. The most basic bacteria had less than 500 genes; man has over 22 thousand. In order for bacteria to evolve into man, organisms would have to be able to add genes. But there is no genetic mechanism that adds a gene.
"The most basic bacteria had less than 500 genes; man has over 22 thousand"
You're new to this, aren't you? There's an amoeba that has a genome 200 times the size of the human genome. You can't just count the genes and declare that it's directly related to organismal complexity. It doesn't work that way.
(Mutations change an existing gene but never add a gene.) This means there is no mechanism for Darwinian Evolution and this is a fatal flaw in the Theory of Evolution.
The average single human gene is a piece of DNA comprised of 100,000 pairs of amino acids all of which are perfectly sequenced. It is impossible for a new gene to appear by chance or by "natural selection."
Wow, maybe you should do some real research, because you've just made yourself look kind of stupid for buying the bull shit the Discovery Institute and other creationist organizations say.
"but a mutation is a change to an existing gene and mutations never result in actually adding a gene. "
Sure they do. It's called a duplication. Or you could take the case of the nylon bug where some nonfunctional DNA was altered into a functional gene coding for a new enzyme.
This stuff isn't being kept secret, if you think you're an authority on the issue you really should be familiar with information like this.
Shall we cut to the chase? This video is wrong. It is most likely 20 years out of date, if not more. For instance, we now have "transitional forms" of the change between aquatic and land dwelling animal. We have transitionals between land dwelling animals and cetaceans.
The video cited a lack of those things as reasons evolution is wrong.
Now that we have them, do you accept that evolution is right?
Please supply the evidence for this transitional fossils,as I've looked for this evidence myself before, but have come out short handed. Scientists haven't found anything since then,other than a t rex with un-fossilized cells(contradicts evolution), and some dinosaur fossil with a crocodile under it. They got fossilized together,somehow.How can we still have crocodiles though,if they were alive 60 million years ago with dinosaurs. Shouldn't this mutations that cause evolution have changed it ?
Actually , it's 100% true , and you DarkCunt saying is false doesn't make it false. Go on , brainwashed blind slave to the devil. Your people(atheists) are truly comical with how EASILY you get brainwashed to believe anything they tell you. You accept any and all arguments from the scientific community , no matter how ridiculous they are. And when scientists change their mind , oh , well , science is always changing , so it's ok. LMAO
You are so stupid. With that logic what you said doesn't make it true. Also there is nothing to suggest I'm Atheist. I accept evolution because there is real evidence to support it. Science only accepts things that have a lot of evidence for it. It is only ridiculous in your opinion. Scientists have been well trained in their profession and know more than you. Scientists change their mind as they begin to understand more about the world. You are a retard for falling for creationist bull shit.
If this was true , why is it that hovind won every single debate he had against scientists ? Why is it so many refused to debate him , citing his ideas were crazy and they didn't want to debate him. Wouldn't someone with crazy stupid ideas be easy to beat ? Yet , he left them speechless countless times. Take a look at the hovind debates , see how stupid scientists look when asked the real questions.
Hovind has never won a debate. I don't remember him being in one. I've only seen him lie in seminars. Scientists don't want to debate him because he is stupid. if you've seen any of his videos you would see he doesn't have a high school education on the subject he lectures. Hovind isn't even a scientist anyways. He bought his PhD from a diploma mill. Those scientists are probably just speechless at his draw dropping idiocy. You are even more retarded to believe him. Do some real research idiot.
"If that were the case they would want to debate him"
No. Hovind makes use of a technique known as the Gish Gallop. He spews out collections of outright lies and nonsense. What he can say in a half an hour would take hours of in depth debunking. So even if his debate opponent spent the entire time countering his lies, in the end the audience would conclude that since he didn't counter all of them, some must have been true.
The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution. This shallow statement is devoid of reason, logic and scientific proof. Evolutionists line up pictures of similar looking species and claim they evolved one to another. The humans "family tree" is an example of this flawed theory.
Petrified skulls and bones exist from hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture.
"The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution"
No. The "evolutionist" will predict that the similarities between groups of species suggests a shared lineage. Comparisons between physical structure and molecular evidence combined with fossil records supports that conclusion.
This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes, elephants or the Platypus. The pictures are placed in all of the text books that evolutionists use to teach kids this nonsense. The pictures are simply a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution.
When faced with the breathtaking inanity of creationist arguments many people are left speechless. But that's more from realizing that the person you are talking to thinks that the theory of evolution includes cosmology yet doesn't know the difference between a galaxy and a nebula than from being dazzled by his knowledge.
If Evolution works, organisms have to have a way to add a gene, because an organism has to increase the number of genes in its genome in order to advance to a more complex organism. Mutating is not a way for any organism to add a gene. A single gene could mutate forever but it would never change the gene count.
Unless you actually see a real fossil don't believe humans being evolved from apes please watch - Evolution of Homo sapiens, Australopithecus and Hesperopithecus and Evolution of Man from my channel
"Please supply the evidence for this transitional fossils"
Okay, let's take a particular example. Tiktaalik. An intermediate between fish and land dwelling tetrapods, it's physical structure is a combination of fishy and tetropod characteristics.
The video says these don't exist, and here it is. What about it fails to qualify as a transitional? What is it you would like to see?
Evolutionists keep getting hit in the face with scientific truth. Therefore, they spend most of their time developing complex lies and molding them into complex theories. They modify fossil evidence in an attempt to support their false theories. Cheat, cheat, cheat. Lie, lie, lie.
"Evolutionists keep getting hit in the face with scientific truth"
That's funny. I mentioned several ways in which this video lies and asked for an explanation of that. I've gotten no responses except a vague dismissal that refused to deal with any specific questions.
The video says we have no transitionals. We have loads of them, more than you are even aware of. You've been kept ignorant of them because your masters know such knowledge would challenge your weak faith.
Petrified skulls and bones exist from hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture. This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes, elephants or the Platypus.
do you think we have indefinite senses or limited senses? of course limited senses; we hear but for a limit, we see but for a limit,.......and we realise but for a limit. We can not see God but this does not deny His existence, we do not hear God but this does not deny His existence. God is beyond our senses, all knowledges we know about Him comes only through His revelations.
Without using a calculator what is 8x8x8x8x8x8x8x8=?
If you can't calculate a simple number without a calculator then how would you understand the creator of the heavens and the earth?
As you can not see the creator you have to know this by using logic and common sense.Allah has created all things with His knowledge, wisdom, and power, and protects this creation with His mercy. If the universewas left to its own care for even a twinkle of an eye, it would collapse and perish.
"If you can't calculate a simple number without a calculator then how would you understand the creator of the heavens and the earth?"
What is this supposed to mean?
Besides being a non sequitor, you're also running SCREAMING away from answering my simple question. Do you deny the existence of the invisible unicorn that lives in my pocket?
The point is that Allah does not exist in the world unlike material objects or physical beings. Allah's existence transcends the world of space and time, as it is He Who has created not only all the objects and beings of the world, but also all the laws of space and time governing material and temporal existence.
". Allah's existence transcends the world of space and time"
Yeah.. that's all well and good.. but the same is true for the flying spaghetti monster. So do you want to talk about science, since this video makes many bold claims about science?
Do you not see the air, bacteria,....but you do not deny their existence but why can you apply the same principles to God, yes you do not see Him but this does not mean He is not there, of course He is there but He is beyond our limited senses.
So that's why they purposefully edited the video making it so I have to trust their word that the scientist contradicted themselves? Instead of just letting me watch them do it thus solidifying there statement as the truth.
My other point was that one fossil alone can't show anything. In the same way you can't build a ship from one plank of wood.
I never said that this was reason to doubt gods existence, rather the credibility of this video.
However, they are generally only infectious for a short time after integration as they acquire 'knockout' mutations during host DNA replication. They can also be partially excised from the genome by a process known as recombinational deletion. Many believe that they play a key role in evolution as well. Some Human ERVs have been implicated in certain autoimmune diseases and cancers.
Retroviruses are viruses that reverse-transcribe their RNA into DNA for integration into the host's genome. Most retroviruses (such as HIV-1) infect somatic cells, but some can also infect germline cells (cells that make eggs and sperm) and once they have done so and have been transmitted to the next generation, they are termed endogenous. Endogenous retroviruses can persist in the genome of their host for long periods.
People who believe in evolution have been brainwashed. Their main problem is not the arguments for and against evolution and creation. Their problem is they can't bring yourself to reject evolution, because they have already rejected God. Humans have a big mental fault. They are not able to admit they were wrong. Therefore, they are trapped in their previous decision of rejecting God.
By the way, not being able to correct false thinking is another blow against evolution. The theory of natural selection should conclude that humans should be able to easily correct false thinking, because it is the most beneficial approach, but they can't. People who have already rejected God cannot reprogram themselves. They are hopelessly lost forever --- doomed with a programmed brain that cannot be formatted. This is why the debate between evolution and creation is hopelessly deadlocked
No, false thinking belong to creation, not evolution. The FACT of natural selection mention such thing, and that is what is happening, unless you think we are still in the middle ages. Which God? You mean the theist God? Such God is easily to refute with reason and logic, that's why most people that turn away can't comeback. Doomed of what? Of a hell? Prove is real. Because creation is a fallacy or myth.
All the scientists say we have many transitional forms, and then the commentator comes on and says the opposite. WTF!?!??
gregrutz 2 years ago 37
"Allah is - Al Khaliq" (The Creator) "Allah is - Al Bari" (The Evolver)
For the Muslim there is no need for separation between religion and science. It is understood from the Quran, revealed over 1,400 years ago, that there is both; "Creation" and "Evolution." And in both instances, it is only Allah who is "Able to do all things."
Allah has explained how He created everything in the universe and brought all life out of water. He created humans from earth (not monkeys)
wallidjan 2 years ago
Science has always failed the test of time because man created science out of his incomplete knowledge.
1st it was understood that the earth was flat, then it was known it was round, then it was known it was oval etc etc.
1st it was understood that the sun never moves, later on after much research it was proved that it too moves like other planets.
wallidjan 2 years ago
The people in this video really don't understand the theory of evolution. And how is science changing over time a bad thing? Are you suppossed to keep teachingthe wrong thing whenevidence has shown its incorrect? That is why science is great. Scientist will continually search for evidence and base their theories onwhat theevidence supports. Its also precisely the reason religion should not enter into science. Religion is dogmatic, if evidence is found which contradicts the reli text its ignored.
Leones44 2 years ago 160
Allah tells us He is Al-Bari, (The Shaper or Evolver) but once again, this does not mean He has a need to bring about each individual life form all from one kind. Actually, while reading the Quran you learn He has brought many types and shapes and sizes as He Wills. Changes within species occur even as quickly as one or two seasons, not even taking a whole year, much less millions as was supposed by Darwin.
wallidjan 2 years ago
[Quran 18:51] I called them not to witness the creation of the heavens and the earth, nor (even) their own creation: nor is it for helpers such as Me to take as lead (men) astray!
No matter how similar we are to apes, but we cannot be transformed from a substandard animal !! Its common sense. Where are the fossils of intermediatery stages ??
wallidjan 2 years ago
0:32
Yes, and you undergo +/- 170 mutations in your life time.
0:54
This is your "scientist"? lol
0:59
These are just creatards and this "documentary" is OOOOOLD!!
Hjernespreng 2 years ago 2
Allah has created us and given us so much, yet we are so careless concerning His Right to be worshipped exclusively and deny the Day of Judgment wherein we will all be asked concerning His Generosity.
Nay! But (it is because) you do not treat orphans with kindness and generosity.
And you do not encourage feeding of the poor!
And you devour inheritance with greed,
And you love wealth with abounding love! [Noble Quran 89:17-20]
wallidjan 2 years ago
Evidence for Evolution ERVs are lingering remnants of failed viral infection which occurred in an ancestor's sex cell and got propagated in its offspring. The viral insertion site is completely random and finding one in the same location in two individuals indicates they each had that same ancestor. humans and chimps share 98,000 ERVs locations in common. What other conclusion can one come to but evolution.
gregrutz 2 years ago
We share such a large portion of our DNA with chimpanzees, being around a 97 or 98 percent similarity.
In the Qur'an, it often says man was created in stages, but also it speaks of the creation of human being through the story of Adam and Eve and the formation of man from the earth (clay). In a way, Islam supports both evolution and creation... However, evidence shows the distinct evolutionary trend of human beings, having a common ancestor with earlier primates
wallidjan 2 years ago
This is a funny old film. But then again, Creationism is a funny old fraud.
luvdomus 2 years ago
Allah has explained how He created everything in the universe and brought all life out of water. He created humans from earth (not monkeys) and there is no need to attempt fabrications of "links" to the animal world in Islam.
wallidjan 2 years ago
i am sorry, i don't know that much about evolution but even i know this video is crap. this reeks of Creationist propaganda. science is about continuously researching and studying a hypothesis, evolution has went under thousands of tests by countless scientists ever since Darwin introduced the idea. so are you going to believe a few creationists, who want to indoctrinate and limit scientific understanding or 150 years of evidence to support evolution.
alchemistxp2 2 years ago 19
The only words that have never changed is the word of Allah - The Quran. Allah was their when humans were made and he was their when the universe came into existence. Therefore we can take Allah's words above all as true and factual.
No matter how similar we are to apes, but we cannot be transformed from a substandard animal !! Its common sense. Where are the fossils of intermediatery stages ??
wallidjan 2 years ago
And why are you using a video from the 70's to combat evolution? You don't think this is dated?
Leones44 2 years ago 224
Evolution is a fact.
ThePsychoReturns 2 years ago
the whole idea of animals evolving into another is just insane!!!!i mean this might happen in pokemon world but in reality?come on!do you really accept this as a scientific thought,they claim that life accidentally appeared on earth and that human accidentally evolved from apes,everything to them is just accidentally,just to deny the truth about allah,while the complexity in nature shows us a fact of a creator
anyways thanks brother wallid,and may allah guide us all to the right path
Mostafaqasemdarx 2 years ago
Im glad you have found your god.. I have not studied allah or many religions and its hard to believe just 1 is correct if any.... I am a strong believer in a creator though :) God bless
Tahnz86 2 years ago
GOD YOU MEAN .
SuperPatrick777 2 years ago
Anyone interested in truly understanding whether evolution existed or not should read Julian Barbour's book 'The End of Time'. Barbour is a physicist who characterizes time differently than the traditional Newtonian time. He also refutes that evolution ever existed, simply because time as we know it never existed. This is not a pro-creationist view, just a fascinating view on apce-time which is akin to Eastern Vedantic philosophy.
mcgyver62 2 years ago
Evolution says we are all mistakes cause by cosmic rays!!! My GRANDFATHER WAS NOT A MUTANT ALIEN MONKEY!!!
jacobins3000 2 years ago
I really hope you're joking.
Leehofooks 2 years ago 4
Bible say we are all mistake because a dirt man and his rib woman ate from a magical tree because a talking snake told them to do so!!! MY GRANDFATHER WAS NOT A MORON THAT BELIEVE WHAT TALKING SNAKE SAY TO HIM!!!
vava54own 2 years ago
Humans were always humans. Used languages to communicate, had advanced skills and were never animals.
The similarities between human and ape fossils can bring out a conclusion that all share the same once creator Allah !!
wallidjan 2 years ago
DNA proves evolution. ERVs are lingering remnants of failed viral infection, which occurred in an ancestor's sex cell and got propagated in its offspring. The viral insertion site is completely random and finding one in the same location in two individuals indicates they each had that same ancestor. Humans and chimps have 98,000 ERV locations in common. Common ancestor?
gregrutz 2 years ago 15
There is no DNA research pointing to a connection between apes and humans as was supposed by the scientists and those who had financed them over the years. In fact, the barnyard pig is closer to humans in many aspects, than a monkey or a gorilla. Consider the fact, doctors use the skin from pigs to replace needed tissue on burn victims and the famous movie actor, John Wayne had a pig's heart valve installed in his own heart in a 1977 operation to save his life.
wallidjan 2 years ago
Chimps are our closest relitives, only 1.2% difference if you don't count repeats.
gregrutz 2 years ago 64
DNA proves that the human species started around 250,000 years ago. So evolution is out of the window.
quizmasterdave 2 years ago
where to start ... first of all we are descended from apes not monkeys. secondly it happened over millions of years, not since your grandfather. We are not mistakes. Evolution by definition cannot make a mistake as only the fittest survive. i suggest you look at the evidence for evolution...rather than doing the intellectual equivalent of covering your ears and shouting whenever you're presented with scientific fact
DBYARD66 2 years ago
O man! What has made you careless concerning your Lord, the Most Generous?
Who created you, fashioned you perfectly, and gave you due proportion;
In whatever form He willed, He put you together.
Nay! But you deny the Recompense (reward for good deeds and punishment for evil deeds). [Noble Quran 82:6-9]
wallidjan 2 years ago
it is difficult to find transitional fossils of the birds that had defective wings because the mutation was not very successful. this mutation would prove to be non beneficial to the animals survival so the trait would die off. thats why its hard to find those in betweens.
kumkwat717 2 years ago
The West assumes that all living creatures are their own lords, work in their own name and for their own pleasure, and that their only aim in life is to survive. It does not see the universal mutual helping among them, as established by their Creator. Plants help animals, and animals help humanity. But it sees even this as conflict and contention, and preaches that life consists of conflict even though all food particles or atoms help nourish the bodys cells.
wallidjan 2 years ago
species don't evolve by mutation, the variation is all ready there.
All fossils are transitional fossils, 99% of all species died.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Nobody disagrees with the fact that man's life upon this planet changes and evolves from one state to another. This evolution takes a wide range in some areas and takes a narrower range in others. The largest scale of evolution covers areas that man uses, such as food, clothing,transportation, lodging, arms, machines and so forth. Islam neither reffises evolution which includes knowledge, wisdom, truth and goodness,
wallidjan 2 years ago
nor does it accept evolution which includes in its process deviance, delinquency and failure. It confronts everything with the Book which Allah has Revealed with truth and justice.
wallidjan 2 years ago
THIS VIDEO IS SO OLD THAT IT'S OUT OF DATE AND RUBBISH... UGHHH!!!
If you're gonna believe in the bible because YOU FEAR SOME GOD OUT THERE then do so!! but don't spread this nonesense..
LOL
WE BELIEVE IN FACTS AND IN STUDIES AND NOT BECAUSE SOME MAGICAL BOOK THAT JUST APPEARED OUT OF NOWHERE and NO HISTORY of Whosoever the "IMAGINATIVE" writer is says that we should believe..
rcheenice 2 years ago 7
so whats your new evidence now.
roniepao 2 years ago
because others believe in science and others believe in Christ.
mikoji123 2 years ago
there are plenty of evolutionary forms.
Humans are a transitional form.
superjeff14 2 years ago
FOOL!
cheeksoffire 2 years ago
In the most simple way to understand how God is real. Think about this, If evolution is the key to understanding why we are here. Then why is Israel and Jarusalem still so important to the world and the U.S.? Why does the U.S. spend 1.3 trillion dollors in supporting Israels military? And why has the U.S. spent so much time protecting all 80% of what they own in Jarusalem?
gumbi8989 2 years ago
OIL!
ricardaomala2000 2 years ago
wow,these creationist saddos will post any old crap.This video is complete and utter rubbish.
stratocaster539 2 years ago
Evolutionists claim that fossil records do show transitional forms, then where are they!?
GWVideos22 2 years ago
Tiktaalik, Archaeopteryx, and Australopithecus are all transitional fossils.
btoku69 2 years ago
Wrong they are extinct apes watch
- Evolution of Homo sapiens, Australopithecus
wallidjan 2 years ago
ok you got me but Tiktaalik and Archaeopteryx are still transitional fossils.
btoku69 2 years ago
Archaeopteryx is thought to be a transition between reptiles and birds. (crit) There are no unambiguous transitional fossils. Archaeopteryx was thought to be a transition between reptile and bird because of its teeth and the claws on its wings. The fact is some fossil birds had teeth, and some didn't. Some reptiles have teeth, and some don't. Some mammals have teeth, and some don't. As far as claws on its wings, there are birds living today that have claws on their wings.
wallidjan 2 years ago
Wow you actually won. Talking to a Darwinist is like talking to a brick wall. I know because less then one year ago I was a Darwinist!
wavepsychic 2 years ago
what mammals don't have teeth and what birds have claws on their wings
Demobriksprod 2 years ago
And Allah has Created every animal from water; of them are some creeping on their bellies; some walk on two legs; and some on four. Allah Creates what He wills: for sure Allah has Power over all things.
[Noble Quran 24:45]
wallidjan 2 years ago
dont argue with creationist you and i both know they are wrong but in an argument with theist they set the rules for what they accept as "evidence" it will all just boil down to them saying simply your wrong. to prove evolution to them we have to find a transitional fossil. it takes really specific circumstances to even create a normal fossil let alone the one we need. i like how creationist want solid physical proof despite there religion being in faith lol
preston9219 2 years ago
if there was a firetruck outside your house with blairing sirens that made your ears ring but you couldnt see it with your eyes would you athiests believe its there? yes of course you would. even if somone said there is nothing outside you would still believe its there. why then can you not accept Gods work and his ever present existance? why then must you spit in His face and deny creation. ask yourself, do you look like a rock? thats where your pathetic theroy tells you we came from.
249smxbass249 2 years ago
"why then can you not accept Gods work and his ever present existance?"
Do you honestly think that the analogy is at all valid? Because no one will hold it against you if you just admit you're phoning it in.
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
In the Qur'an, people are asked to look around them for the signs of Allah in the natural world. The balance of the world, the rhythms of life, are "signs for those who would believe." The universe is in perfect order: the orbits of the planets, the cycles of life and death, the seasons of the year, the mountains and the rivers, the mysteries of the human body. This order and balance are not haphazard nor random. The world, and everything in it, has been created with a perfect plan, by Allah
wallidjan 2 years ago
Ok.
Are you trying to start a debate or just soliloquizing?
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
Ratings are disabled! How immediately surprising.
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
(Ratings are disabled! How immediately surprising)
Revealing your 1 star intentions! How Evotypically latent minded
Like a true Athevolutionist monopolizer of logic, reasoning & intelligence, u brilliantly foresaw that your intention revealing comment demonstrates exactly why Creationists must disable ratings. You demonstrated this even while you were criticizing the neutral, harmless disabling act that differs greatly from your 1 star, censoring intentions
Absolutely mutationally Evogenius!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"Revealing your 1 star intentions!"
Um, zing?
"Like a true Athevolutionist monopolizer of logic"
You're right, I DO have a monopoly on logic! Thanks for recognizing it!
"u brilliantly foresaw that your intention"
I'm pretty good at foreseeing my own intentions.
"exactly why Creationists must disable ratings."
Because they are afraid of criticism and have a persecution complex?
"Absolutely mutationally Evogenius!"
Do you think this is clever? Because portmanteaus are pretty cliched by now.
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
(have a persecution complex?)
Ha Ha, Evo Simianites are the ones with the attitude that Christianity must be suppressed or divorcee's, gays, prostitutes etc. are all going to get stoned to death. Oh yea, just like it always used to happen during most of U.S. history.
(I'm pretty good at foreseeing my own intentions)
More like your own intestines!
What cranially constipated cretins!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"Evo Simianites"
I can tell you think you're being funny here, I just can't tell why.
"Christianity must be suppressed"
Nope.
"Oh yea, just like it always used to happen during most of U.S. history."
Um, no?
"More like your own intestines!"
You practicing for open mic night at your youth group or something?
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
(Because they are afraid of criticism)
Talk about a total Apetard. You posted a comment in which you "criticized" the disabling of ratings. Now you talk as if it disabled you from posting criticisms
Yet, you're still atrociously audacious enough to say -
"You're right, I DO have a monopoly on logic"
You're forgetting that Monopoly money isn't real either.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"Talk about a total Apetard."
Again, portmanteaus aren't funny anymore, this isn't 1999.
"Now you talk as if it disabled you from posting criticisms"
No I didn't, I insulted their general cowardice. Which is seen across youtube.
"You're forgetting that Monopoly money isn't real either. "
When do we get past the part where you think you're Robin Williams?
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
(Again, portmanteaus aren't funny anymore - you think you're Robin Williams? - I can tell you think you're being funny here - Do you think this is clever? - You practicing for open mic night?)
That's just the way it always seems when you're on the receiving end of an ass tearing torrent of terrible tongue lashings
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"That's just the way it always seems when you're on the receiving end of an ass tearing torrent of terrible tongue lashings."
So you frequently tongue torn asses?
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
(So you frequently tongue torn asses?)
Gee, I won't be able to plagiarize that one at the youth group. Maybe you'll time share your open mic night with me?
Hey Ragu face, You know of any good eye openers? I'll have to wake up the tough crowd after they fell to sleep when their tomatoes & their fun ran out
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"Gee, I won't be able to plagiarize that one at the youth group."
No, but you're shtick is mostly just putting random words together anyway, so it's no great loss.
"Maybe you'll time share your open mic night with me?"
I don't think so.
"You know of any good eye openers?"
No.
"I'll have to wake up the tough crowd after they fell to sleep when their tomatoes"
Ok.
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
Misleading to say the least.
locouru 2 years ago
You don't have to be so shameless about it. Its unnecessary to revealingly describe yourself since all intelligent Creationists already know that a explanatorily unsupported, mere, alleger assertion is usually presented by one who's been mislead and in turn, misleads with a condescendingly minimal, presumptuous attribution.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
I have no idea what you response has to do with my comment.
locouru 2 years ago
Sorry! Perhaps it was too many words and should have been misleadingly minimally asserted
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
It doesn't, he just thinks he's funny.
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
"This is not evolution! Evolutionists should know better." Uhm, no, you don't get to say what evolution is, (because you'll just make up crazy shit that no one in their right mind would believe) the evolutionists do. The makers of this video have severely misunderstood just about everything about evolution. For one thing, EVERY ANIMAL that ever lived and reproduced is a transitional form. But if that doesn't do it for you, wiki Tiktaalik.
GuacamoleKun 2 years ago
Since we all know that bronze age story books were fabrications of tyrannically bronzed socialist governments & since evo is obviously evidentially presumable, then it can only be discovered that all uncreated creatures are transcendentally transitional intermediary link-like creatures.
{But if that doesn't do it for you, wiki Tiktaalik}
Personally, what really does it for me is wanki Dikandlik
Stay tuned, for more "Spanking Answers to Stupendously Stupid Cretins"
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
evolution's falsifiable status. If ever they should gain even an inkling of understanding, then evo would be unfalsifiable. Simply because Creationists would be convinced & there would be none left to bear unfalsifiable witness against evolution.
{EVERY ANIMAL that ever lived and reproduced is a transitional form}
Heeeeey men to that. oops sorry, I mean, "ape-like creatures to that". Another Creationist misunderstanding is regarding the scientific methods of discovering evidence for a theory
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"evolution's falsifiable status."
"Falsifiable"? It's adorable when you think you know things.
"unfalsifiable witness against evolution."
How would a witness be falsified, exactly? Popper would be very upset.
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
(It's adorable when you think you know things)
You should see how adorable I am when I think I know I'm wearing a G-String
(Popper would be very upset)
I don't even know of any "Popper"
But since you do, why would Popper be upset if he got to pop yours?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"You should see how adorable I am when I think I know I'm wearing a G-String"
There are better ways to work through your self image issues.
"I don't even know of any "Popper""
Yeah, I know you don't. Karl Popper was the philosopher who came up with the idea of falsifiability that you were misusing earlier.
"But since you do, why would Popper be upset if he got to pop yours? "
See, now this is slightly better than the portmanteaus.
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
(There are better ways to work through your self image issues)
Ha Ha Ha Ha........ AAAAAAAAAhhh Ha Ha Ha Ha
Oh wait no, please, oh I'm going to pee my G, oh oh AAAAAAAAAAhh Ha Ha Ha Ha
That's hypocritically hilarious.......... Robin Orkian
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"That's hypocritically hilarious"
How is it hypocritical? I mean, I appreciate the alliteration, (which seems to be a theme) but the content is lacking.
"Robin Orkian "
Referencing what, exacty?
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
Precisely adjusted fecal matter such as pig toothed, ape-like creatures, 4 legged whales, artistically, commonly descended embryos and "Lucy By Some Guy With Grinders"
{The makers of this video have severely misunderstood just about everything about evolution}
Of course they have! For if they had not, then evolution might absurdly be deemed unfalsifiable? It's only the expectedly dependable and perpetual misunderstanding of Creationists that can continue to maintain
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"GuangaholeKunt"
{Uhm, no, you don't get to say what evolution is, because you'll just make up crazy shit that no one in their right mind would believe}
Certainly, only evolutionists should get to say what is evolution. Since they'll only present perfectly sound defecations that no one in their left mind wouldn't believe
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
we have tons of transitional forms. i guess you're just not willing to drop your preconceived notion that god did it instantly to even research it and look up the available fossil evidence.
WHERE is the evidence?There is none.There is no such evidence that one species transforms into another different species.THERE IS NO EVIDENCE.
imacgoo 2 years ago
The viewers of this video cannot see it, but the poster of this video has stopped responding to me in channel and is sending me private messages talking about god and claiming the existence of more scientific lies..
Without ever addressing the lies stated in this very video.
Get your own house in order first, wallidjan. You're making false claims that you know you cannot address, you're desperate to change the subject to religion even though you claim to be addressing science.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
oh look, ratings disabled.... wonder why that is..?...
what year is this from? must be super current...
lol
thisguysajerk 2 years ago
People who believe in evolution have been brainwashed. Their main problem is not the arguments for and against evolution and creation. Their problem is they can't bring yourself to reject evolution, because they have already rejected God. Humans have a big mental fault. They are not able to admit they were wrong. Therefore, they are trapped in their previous decision of rejecting God.
wallidjan 2 years ago
You are deluded in thinking that evolution is an atheist perspective. What do you say about the mass of christians who also accept it?
The fact is that when there are more scientists who think the holocaust never happened than those that disbelieve in evolution, you probably need to stop and question why that it. It's FAR more probable that instead of the entire world being wrong, it's you who is wrong.
Proletariat12 2 years ago
"They are not able to admit they were wrong."
wrong. i used to believe in god then, one day i admitted i was wrong. because well, i had no evidence to back up my claim.
and also you are deluded in thinking that evolution is an atheist perspective.
"Therefore, they are trapped in their previous decision of rejecting God."
or
Therefore, they are trapped in their previous decision of accepting God.
i was taught about god creating everything LONG before i was taught about evolution
thisguysajerk 2 years ago
Spain was ruled by Muslims under the banner of Islam for over 700 years. By the 15th century of the Gregorian calendar the ruler-ship of Islam had been seated in Spain and Muslims had established centers of learning which commanded respect all over the known world at that time. There were no "Dark Ages" such the rest of Europe experienced for the Muslims in Spain and those who lived there with them.
wallidjan 2 years ago
wtf? is there a valid point in there...i could google some shit like that too
Sinonez 2 years ago
In January of 1492 Muslim Spain capitulated to Catholic Rome under King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella. By July of the same year, Muslims were instrumental in helping navigate Christopher Columbus to the Caribbean South of Florida. It was, moreover, with the help of Muslim navigators and their inventions that Magellan was able to traverse the Cape of Good Hope, and Da Gamma and Columbus had Muslim navigators on board their ships.
wallidjan 2 years ago
"People who believe in evolution have been brainwashed. Their main problem is not the arguments for and against evolution and creation. Their problem is they can't bring yourself to reject evolution, because they have already rejected God."
wrong. i base my acceptance of evolution upon the evidence for it. and i deject god due to the overwhelming LACK of evidence to support it.
thisguysajerk 2 years ago
"Their main problem is not the arguments for and against evolution and creation"
Of course not, their arguments are correct. You know this, you cannot address them. You can only dodge them and try to shift the subject back to religion.
Once again. This video says there are no transitional fossils. There are many known to science.
How do you resolve this conflict, other than running to read a holy book?
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Creation vs. Evolution - Reason vs. Religion
The popular media often portrays the creation vs. evolution debate as science vs. religion, with creation being religious and evolution being scientific. Unfortunately, if you don't agree with this label, you too are labeled. Regardless of whether you're a creationist or an evolutionist, if you disagree with the stereotype, you're condemned and "exposed" as a religious fanatic who is secretly trying to pass religion off as science or,
wallidjan 2 years ago
even worse, trying to disprove science in order to redeem a ridiculous, unscientific, religious worldview. The fact is neither model of origins has been established beyond a reasonable doubt (otherwise, the theory of evolution wouldn't be called the "theory" of evolution). Whether we like to admit it or not, those of us who subscribe to the theory of evolution do so by faith. And while the recognition of design in biology may have theological implications, it is not based upon religious premise.
wallidjan 2 years ago
"even worse, trying to disprove science in order to redeem a ridiculous, unscientific, religious worldview."
Okay then, so you're ready to address a real question that is easily answered, right?
Are there transitional fossils? Does this video lie?
I keep trying to talk about basic scientific facts, and you keep trying to swerve into theology. I'm not interested in theology. This video makes clear claims regarding facts in the material world.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
"otherwise, the theory of evolution wouldn't be called the "theory" of evolution."
You know that it's still called the "atomic theory" right? Even though we know that atoms exist? Or that it's still called the "heliocentric theory" even though we know the sun is the center of our solar system? A theory is not some rung on a ladder where "fact" is the highest, it's an explanatory device and the fact that you don't know this is evidence of your staggeringly comical ignorance.
BlueQuestions 2 years ago
a frisbee, but like a homerun baseball. BTW, the artistic, embryonic pig tooth people lied to you, Copernicus was on our side
A fossil doesn't have its head back like that because someone "rung" its neck & whacked it with a ladder. Its because they drowned....... in the great deluge! The fact that you don't know this is evidence of your staggering, drunken monkey status
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
OK, so they're all still called theories. But there's still one slight difference. Other theories are supported & validated by empiricism. Evo theory is supported by the democratic consensus of the numerously common, ordinarily mediocre many. While being rejected by the uncommonly extraordinary, radiantly stellar, brilliant few.
Atomic theory - I am... therefor atomic.
Heliocentric - Only Evotards talk about a flat earth. Creationists never do, since we know it doesn't fly around the sun like
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
the chance of evolutionary process creating even the most basic digestive enzyme: 1:1 followed by 40,000 zeros.
danjames56 2 years ago
Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his "Theory of Evolution." Well, these transitional links have never been found. We only find individual species. Evolutionists try to form these individual species into a link according to similar major features, such as wings or four legs, but this simply proves the Theory of Evolution to be a fraud.
wallidjan 2 years ago
"Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his "Theory of Evolution."
NO he did not. The BS is often repeated by creationists. The complete works of can be found at Dawin Online so you can check for yourself. In fact in Origin (Ch. 11) he was a pains to point out why the paucity of fossil evidence then available was to be expected and why it did not cause problem for the theory of evolution.
Minttzz 2 years ago
"Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his "Theory of Evolution." Well, these transitional links have never been found."
ummmm wrong.,,
we have tons of transitional forms. i guess you're just not willing to drop your preconceived notion that god did it instantly to even research it and look up the available fossil evidence.
thisguysajerk 2 years ago
on top of the mass amounts of fossil evidence we also now have DNA evidence. but again i guess you're not open enough to honestly research this topic, so maybe you weren't aware.
if you don't believe in evolution, please never take another antibiotic when you are sick. antibiotics were developed using our knowledge of evolution to engineer antibiotic viruses to fight viruses negative to our health.
without our knowledge of evolution, non of that would be possible.
thisguysajerk 2 years ago
Evidence for Evolution - Observed Natural Selection
(Survival of the fittest): (ex) Darwin's proposed mechanism for evolutionary change is observed in nature. (crit) Natural selection serves as a means of conservation, not one of creation. It explains survival of a species, not arrival of a species. Here's an illustration: You work in a car factory. Your job is quality control - make sure the cars work like they are supposed to.
wallidjan 2 years ago
You kick the tires and slam the doors, drive the cars around, etc. You identify and remove defects. How long would it take for this selection process to turn one of those cars into an airplane naturally over time? It won't happen. "Natural selection may have a stabilizing effect, but it does not promote speciation [the arrival of a new species]. It is not a creative force as many people have suggested." (Daniel Brooks "A downward Slope to Greater Diversity," Science, Vol. 217, 24 September 1982)
wallidjan 2 years ago
out of curiosity what is your view?
Sinonez 2 years ago
god did it.
lulz...
thisguysajerk 2 years ago
This is beyond stupid, it isn't even worth arguing with
nithuigimanceist 2 years ago
So, while you're sitting there telling me that no transitional fossils exist another one has been discovered. It's called Puijila darwini, and it's a transitional form of extant seals.
Oops.. what's that you say? Only humans have transitional fossils? Wrong, I say. We certainly have a lot of transitional ape fossils because of the interest in human ancestry, but if you'd bother to look you'd find plenty for other animals as well.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Evolution where is the proof watch- Evolution of Homo sapiens, Australopithecus and Hesperopithecus to find out?
wallidjan 2 years ago
How about you address the current issue of transitional fossils first? Do they exist or don't they?
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Once again. This video lies. I've asked you to respond to it and you cannot. MANY transitional forms are known to science. You cannot get out of it by simply denying that transitional forms can exist, so therefore anything that looks like them is something else. You're desperately rationalizing away the information that contradicts what you need to believe is true.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Evolution claim they have tons of evidence mutations occur and this is genetic evidence that supports Darwinian Evolution.
There is a ton of evidence that mutations occur - but a mutation is a change to an existing gene and mutations never result in actually adding a gene.
We have explained that if Evolution works, organisms have to have a way to add a gene, because an organism has to increase the number of genes in its genome in order to advance to a more complex organism.
wallidjan 2 years ago
Mutating is not a way for any organism to add a gene. A single gene could mutate forever but it would never change the gene count.
Evolutionists claim we evolved from the simplest form of bacterial life to ever more complex forms of life. The most basic bacteria had less than 500 genes; man has over 22 thousand. In order for bacteria to evolve into man, organisms would have to be able to add genes. But there is no genetic mechanism that adds a gene.
wallidjan 2 years ago
"The most basic bacteria had less than 500 genes; man has over 22 thousand"
You're new to this, aren't you? There's an amoeba that has a genome 200 times the size of the human genome. You can't just count the genes and declare that it's directly related to organismal complexity. It doesn't work that way.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
(Mutations change an existing gene but never add a gene.) This means there is no mechanism for Darwinian Evolution and this is a fatal flaw in the Theory of Evolution.
The average single human gene is a piece of DNA comprised of 100,000 pairs of amino acids all of which are perfectly sequenced. It is impossible for a new gene to appear by chance or by "natural selection."
wallidjan 2 years ago
Wow, maybe you should do some real research, because you've just made yourself look kind of stupid for buying the bull shit the Discovery Institute and other creationist organizations say.
TheDarkKnight987 2 years ago
"It is impossible for a new gene to appear by chance or by "natural selection.""
It's been demonstrated to happen again and again. The easiest to understand example is the nylon bug, it's documented all over the place.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
"but a mutation is a change to an existing gene and mutations never result in actually adding a gene. "
Sure they do. It's called a duplication. Or you could take the case of the nylon bug where some nonfunctional DNA was altered into a functional gene coding for a new enzyme.
This stuff isn't being kept secret, if you think you're an authority on the issue you really should be familiar with information like this.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Shall we cut to the chase? This video is wrong. It is most likely 20 years out of date, if not more. For instance, we now have "transitional forms" of the change between aquatic and land dwelling animal. We have transitionals between land dwelling animals and cetaceans.
The video cited a lack of those things as reasons evolution is wrong.
Now that we have them, do you accept that evolution is right?
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Please supply the evidence for this transitional fossils,as I've looked for this evidence myself before, but have come out short handed. Scientists haven't found anything since then,other than a t rex with un-fossilized cells(contradicts evolution), and some dinosaur fossil with a crocodile under it. They got fossilized together,somehow.How can we still have crocodiles though,if they were alive 60 million years ago with dinosaurs. Shouldn't this mutations that cause evolution have changed it ?
demoniclordwizard 2 years ago
You have just made yourself look stupid. Everything you just said is 100% false.
TheDarkKnight987 2 years ago
Actually , it's 100% true , and you DarkCunt saying is false doesn't make it false. Go on , brainwashed blind slave to the devil. Your people(atheists) are truly comical with how EASILY you get brainwashed to believe anything they tell you. You accept any and all arguments from the scientific community , no matter how ridiculous they are. And when scientists change their mind , oh , well , science is always changing , so it's ok. LMAO
demoniclordwizard 2 years ago
You are so stupid. With that logic what you said doesn't make it true. Also there is nothing to suggest I'm Atheist. I accept evolution because there is real evidence to support it. Science only accepts things that have a lot of evidence for it. It is only ridiculous in your opinion. Scientists have been well trained in their profession and know more than you. Scientists change their mind as they begin to understand more about the world. You are a retard for falling for creationist bull shit.
TheDarkKnight987 2 years ago
If this was true , why is it that hovind won every single debate he had against scientists ? Why is it so many refused to debate him , citing his ideas were crazy and they didn't want to debate him. Wouldn't someone with crazy stupid ideas be easy to beat ? Yet , he left them speechless countless times. Take a look at the hovind debates , see how stupid scientists look when asked the real questions.
demoniclordwizard 2 years ago
Hovind has never won a debate. I don't remember him being in one. I've only seen him lie in seminars. Scientists don't want to debate him because he is stupid. if you've seen any of his videos you would see he doesn't have a high school education on the subject he lectures. Hovind isn't even a scientist anyways. He bought his PhD from a diploma mill. Those scientists are probably just speechless at his draw dropping idiocy. You are even more retarded to believe him. Do some real research idiot.
TheDarkKnight987 2 years ago
"I don't remember him being in one"
Then maybe you should youtube hovind debate.
"cientists don't want to debate him because he is stupid"
If that were the case they would want to debate him , because beating him would be easy, and that would make them look good.
"Hovind isn't even a scientist anyways"
LOL
"Those scientists are probably just speechless at his draw dropping idiocy"
LOL
demoniclordwizard 2 years ago
"If that were the case they would want to debate him"
No. Hovind makes use of a technique known as the Gish Gallop. He spews out collections of outright lies and nonsense. What he can say in a half an hour would take hours of in depth debunking. So even if his debate opponent spent the entire time countering his lies, in the end the audience would conclude that since he didn't counter all of them, some must have been true.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution. This shallow statement is devoid of reason, logic and scientific proof. Evolutionists line up pictures of similar looking species and claim they evolved one to another. The humans "family tree" is an example of this flawed theory.
wallidjan 2 years ago
Petrified skulls and bones exist from hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture.
wallidjan 2 years ago
"The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution"
No. The "evolutionist" will predict that the similarities between groups of species suggests a shared lineage. Comparisons between physical structure and molecular evidence combined with fossil records supports that conclusion.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes, elephants or the Platypus. The pictures are placed in all of the text books that evolutionists use to teach kids this nonsense. The pictures are simply a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution.
wallidjan 2 years ago
"Yet , he left them speechless countless times"
When faced with the breathtaking inanity of creationist arguments many people are left speechless. But that's more from realizing that the person you are talking to thinks that the theory of evolution includes cosmology yet doesn't know the difference between a galaxy and a nebula than from being dazzled by his knowledge.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
If Evolution works, organisms have to have a way to add a gene, because an organism has to increase the number of genes in its genome in order to advance to a more complex organism. Mutating is not a way for any organism to add a gene. A single gene could mutate forever but it would never change the gene count.
wallidjan 2 years ago
"If Evolution works, organisms have to have a way to add a gene"
And I just explained to you how a gene can be added. So therefore we have no problem there.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Unless you actually see a real fossil don't believe humans being evolved from apes please watch - Evolution of Homo sapiens, Australopithecus and Hesperopithecus and Evolution of Man from my channel
wallidjan 2 years ago
You're trying to change the topic. You said there is no way for a gene to be added, I just explained to you how it can happen.
That in itself was an attempt to change the topic away from the fossils that you claim do not exist but can be readily demonstrated to exist.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Oh yea I was exaggerating when I said 100% false, but what you said is still mostly wrong.
TheDarkKnight987 2 years ago
"Your people(atheists) are truly comical with how EASILY you get brainwashed to believe anything they tell you. "
So says a believer in a literally true book that contradicts itself.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
"Please supply the evidence for this transitional fossils,as I've looked for this evidence myself before, but have come out short handed"
Ahuh. In other words, you'll never accept anything that you're presented with.
And about the T-rex, guess what? There's significant evidence that your unfossilized cells are actually a mat of bacteria.
The crocodiles living today are not identical to those that lived in the time of the dinosaurs. Of course they've evolved since then.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
"Please supply the evidence for this transitional fossils"
Okay, let's take a particular example. Tiktaalik. An intermediate between fish and land dwelling tetrapods, it's physical structure is a combination of fishy and tetropod characteristics.
The video says these don't exist, and here it is. What about it fails to qualify as a transitional? What is it you would like to see?
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Evolutionists keep getting hit in the face with scientific truth. Therefore, they spend most of their time developing complex lies and molding them into complex theories. They modify fossil evidence in an attempt to support their false theories. Cheat, cheat, cheat. Lie, lie, lie.
wallidjan 2 years ago
"Evolutionists keep getting hit in the face with scientific truth"
That's funny. I mentioned several ways in which this video lies and asked for an explanation of that. I've gotten no responses except a vague dismissal that refused to deal with any specific questions.
The video says we have no transitionals. We have loads of them, more than you are even aware of. You've been kept ignorant of them because your masters know such knowledge would challenge your weak faith.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Petrified skulls and bones exist from hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture. This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes, elephants or the Platypus.
wallidjan 2 years ago
"They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture"
What make believe creatures? The video makes the same serious claim. Name one make believe creature invented to fill in the gaps.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Interesting that those scientists contradicted themselves but they didn't bother to show it in the video.
Dr. Patterson "there is not one such fossil for which one might make a water tight argument"
Isn't that like saying there is not 'one' plank from which you can make a water tight hull.
yellowkrux 2 years ago
do you think we have indefinite senses or limited senses? of course limited senses; we hear but for a limit, we see but for a limit,.......and we realise but for a limit. We can not see God but this does not deny His existence, we do not hear God but this does not deny His existence. God is beyond our senses, all knowledges we know about Him comes only through His revelations.
wallidjan 2 years ago
"We can not see God but this does not deny His existence"
You cannot see the invisible unicorn that lives in my pocket either.
Do you deny his existence?
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Without using a calculator what is 8x8x8x8x8x8x8x8=?
If you can't calculate a simple number without a calculator then how would you understand the creator of the heavens and the earth?
As you can not see the creator you have to know this by using logic and common sense.Allah has created all things with His knowledge, wisdom, and power, and protects this creation with His mercy. If the universewas left to its own care for even a twinkle of an eye, it would collapse and perish.
wallidjan 2 years ago
"If you can't calculate a simple number without a calculator then how would you understand the creator of the heavens and the earth?"
What is this supposed to mean?
Besides being a non sequitor, you're also running SCREAMING away from answering my simple question. Do you deny the existence of the invisible unicorn that lives in my pocket?
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
The point is that Allah does not exist in the world unlike material objects or physical beings. Allah's existence transcends the world of space and time, as it is He Who has created not only all the objects and beings of the world, but also all the laws of space and time governing material and temporal existence.
wallidjan 2 years ago
". Allah's existence transcends the world of space and time"
Yeah.. that's all well and good.. but the same is true for the flying spaghetti monster. So do you want to talk about science, since this video makes many bold claims about science?
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Do you not see the air, bacteria,....but you do not deny their existence but why can you apply the same principles to God, yes you do not see Him but this does not mean He is not there, of course He is there but He is beyond our limited senses.
wallidjan 2 years ago
So that's why they purposefully edited the video making it so I have to trust their word that the scientist contradicted themselves? Instead of just letting me watch them do it thus solidifying there statement as the truth.
My other point was that one fossil alone can't show anything. In the same way you can't build a ship from one plank of wood.
I never said that this was reason to doubt gods existence, rather the credibility of this video.
P.S.
Are you a Muslim?
yellowkrux 2 years ago
Comment removed
yellowkrux 2 years ago
How the hell could there be so many lies in one video?
TheDarkKnight987 2 years ago
"How the hell could there be so many lies in one video? "
Because the ten commandments (including not bearing false witness) often aren't followed by those that most claim to follow them?
NomadSoul76 2 years ago
Yea that's true.
TheDarkKnight987 2 years ago
However, they are generally only infectious for a short time after integration as they acquire 'knockout' mutations during host DNA replication. They can also be partially excised from the genome by a process known as recombinational deletion. Many believe that they play a key role in evolution as well. Some Human ERVs have been implicated in certain autoimmune diseases and cancers.
THADI0US 2 years ago
Retroviruses are viruses that reverse-transcribe their RNA into DNA for integration into the host's genome. Most retroviruses (such as HIV-1) infect somatic cells, but some can also infect germline cells (cells that make eggs and sperm) and once they have done so and have been transmitted to the next generation, they are termed endogenous. Endogenous retroviruses can persist in the genome of their host for long periods.
THADI0US 2 years ago
People who believe in evolution have been brainwashed. Their main problem is not the arguments for and against evolution and creation. Their problem is they can't bring yourself to reject evolution, because they have already rejected God. Humans have a big mental fault. They are not able to admit they were wrong. Therefore, they are trapped in their previous decision of rejecting God.
wallidjan 2 years ago
By the way, not being able to correct false thinking is another blow against evolution. The theory of natural selection should conclude that humans should be able to easily correct false thinking, because it is the most beneficial approach, but they can't. People who have already rejected God cannot reprogram themselves. They are hopelessly lost forever --- doomed with a programmed brain that cannot be formatted. This is why the debate between evolution and creation is hopelessly deadlocked
wallidjan 2 years ago
No, false thinking belong to creation, not evolution. The FACT of natural selection mention such thing, and that is what is happening, unless you think we are still in the middle ages. Which God? You mean the theist God? Such God is easily to refute with reason and logic, that's why most people that turn away can't comeback. Doomed of what? Of a hell? Prove is real. Because creation is a fallacy or myth.
FreeThought10 2 years ago