Added: 4 years ago
From: Oliver5893
Views: 7,435
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (72)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • vista was shit

    until sp2

    then i said

    THE WOW STARTS NOW

    and then got windows 7

    and said#

    Yay new taskbar and gave windows vista away

  • Windows 98 was pretty beast.

  • microsoft windows vista is bye far the worst operating system from microsoft ever released and persaly should have abandoned it and fire the guy who came up with it .

  • Ive tried vista and have been a longtime windows user... Vista is by far the worst operating system I have EVER used... microsoft has lost me as a customer

  • you are so stupid, this was either made by a mac fanboy or a linux homo because anybody who has actually used vista on a daily basis (with sp1, i will concede that without sp1 it sucks) is much better than xp ever could be. more secure, NEVER CRASHED. never had errors. it owned in every way.

  • whats one thing PC users can do that mac users cant? shutup about macs

  • lol i have a mac and i dont really talk about it much. i did now, but thats besides the point XD

  • lol lol lol.

    a plane crashes. vista crashes... that makes sense!!! lol

  • You're a fanboy, making fun of another operating system. You don't have a life. I mean come on, your username says it all, n00b.

  • watEVA man.

  • u guys r nerds

  • The advert is saying, "Wow, that sucked. Like a plane crash kind of wow. Vista will crash! It will make you cry!"

  • It's LEOPARD that spent too much time on eye-candy. The flip browser is THE WORST way to look for something. On the other hand, Vista's index search is ingenious- you can drag and drop search results to any folder or the desktop- can spotlight do that? no. I think it's Apple that needs to start rethinking smart design.

  • amen to that

  • at least apple didnt rip off a OS when they were mak'n there OSes!!!!!

  • OSX and every MacOS based operating system is just a modified version of FreeBSD. Apple were even lazier than Microsoft, they took a GNU operating system, modified it, then sold it. They're using a technicality to sell an operating system they didn't write.

  • wrong- they did rip off an OS and in fact, they STILL are ripping off OS's. Time Machine? Yeah it's called System Recovery for Windows and that's been around for a while.

    You should know that nobody here who has a life, really puts their entire faith in one system or another. Mac, Windows- whatever works for you that's fine. No need to push your religion onto other people.

  • I cannot understand people who say Vista is "Shit" having never used it themselves. Sure it might be a little different and take a bit to get used to again, but overall it is a lot more stable that XP ever was. Windows is an ENTERTAINMENT platform. That is WHY it needs so much power to run. Microsoft rebuilt the entire OS and designed it to run on the new Intel Core2 chips, hence it won't run well on the Pentium class. Pentiums are based on a design that is over 15 years old!

  • i must agree with you dust11inc

  • people wouldnt say that its crap if it wasnt a complete rip off of MacOSX .!

  • OSX and every MacOS based operating system is just a modified version of FreeBSD. Apple were even lazier than Microsoft, they took a GNU operating system, modified it, then sold it. They're using a technicality to sell an operating system they didn't even write. Microsoft rewrote their entire kernel with Vista. Hardly what I'd call ripping something off. Do some research before making baseless claims.

  • heeeeeey. wat bout with MS DOS??? did ms make that entirely???NOOOOOOOOOO! B.G bought PC-DOS n modified it.

  • No, they bought 86-DOS from Seattle Computer Products. Apple stole FreeBSD. Anyway, Microsoft developed the NT core, which is what's been in use for a long time, and makes up the base of Windows 2000, XP, and what Vista is designed around. There were also MANY versions of DOS, not just MS DOS. There was Novell DOS, DR-DOS and PC-DOS too. Windows was initially just a shell for DOS, but they moved from that idea and decided to use the more stable, more secure, NT platform for their OS.

  • ok, it mayb tru that Apple didnt do all the wrk but still, when Apple had 2 do alot of wrk to turn BSD into a OS that had a decent n user friendly GUI. Apple was the 1st 2 make a decent user friendly OS. u gotta admit, win95 looks VERY simular to MacOS System 7. They both got a bar on the screen, they're both got the alias feature, they both got sum kind of symbol in a corner of the screen n they both have sum kind of trash icon.

  • hey man, i didnt make a baseless claim. when i saw that vista ripped off OSX im not talk'n bout the technical crap. im talk'n bout the features. the things that people care bout. 4 example, "gadgets" is just another name 4 widgets. "instant search" is just another name 4 spot light. get me now???

  • Ok, firstly, you're just repeating something which somebody else said in a video blog well over a year ago. Secondly, learn to spell.

    What you're saying, is that the only features Vista have are Widgets and a Search Bar? And you're poking fun at an operating system which is, according to your earlier comment, just like the operating system you swear by? You fail. Logic points go to me! If I were you, I'd pull my face out of Apple's crotch, and actually put some thought into my arguments.

  • i know howto spell u idiot. r u tell'n me that u write properly when u do IM with people??? there's no need 2 write in full on the internet..! i NEVA sed that spot light/widgets were the ONLY features that were copied... they were only 2 examples. 1 other thing that was majorly copied was the trash can. the vista 1 almost looks exactly the same! OSX has a "documents" folder, MS rename there my documents folder 2 "documents" . wat bout iPhoto? windows photo gallery looks V E R Y simular.

  • Ok, for starters, "howto" is not a word. It's "how to", or sometimes "how-to". You've spelled "similar" wrong too. Also, if you want people to take you seriously ANYWHERE, that include online, you speak properly. It would take you an extra second all up at the most.

    Now, you've taken what I'm saying out of context, you're saying that I'm defending Vista like the Virgin Mary. Do you honestly think I'm that biased? I use Vista, yes. It's quite nice, but I also use XP, Backtrack, Knoppix, etc..

  • And it looks like the only thing you're backing is the cosmetic appearance of OSX/Leopard.

    If you don't like the look of Vista, deal with it. What an operating system looks like has no bearing on how stable it is, or how secure it is. What functions it performs, and to what ends it can perform in an ideal environment.

    MacOS has had the same white/grey look for a long time now. Windows has changed, it has evolved.

    If Apple computers were really all that good, we'd all have them.

  • The only reason more people started buying them in recent years, is because of all the advertising they put into them. There's also the misconception people have that "My iPod will only work on a Mac".

    Nobody cares if the Recycle Bin looks like the Trash Can.

    My recycling bin and my garbage bin look similar, should I take my local council to court over it? You idiot.

    And ftw, yes I do write properly in IM. I sometimes omit capital letters. But, I respect my own language and I use it properly.

  • ur the idiot. ur say'n that vista didnt copy OS X at all. "cough", ummmm yea, they kinda did. LOOK AT THE TRASH CAN. it looks exactly the same on vista.

  • never said that once. not only are you an idiot, you're liar too! As i said before, nobody cares if it looks similar, or even exactly the same.

  • ur an idiot. shut up.

  • we'd all have 'em if they didnt cost too much. the majority of the people in the world get what eva is cheapest.

  • Want to know why they cost so much? Its the international shipping costs. Every Mac comes prebuilt from a factory in the US. They're much cheaper there. Not only that, you'll void your warranty if you try to upgrade it yourself, even if you have qualifications. With a PC, you can build it yourself, you can customise it, and support is EVERYWHERE.

    There's also the huge amounts of money Apple spend on advertising, trying to get people to buy their expensive machines.

  • woopy doo. who cares if i spell it wrong, mr perfect. i can spell good but i cant b bothered to spell correctly when i write stuff on the internet.

  • Hence why nobody is taking you seriously.

  • same with u.

  • i've had plenty of people agree with me, you're the one who's on their own, fool.

  • i could hurt u. so, u better watch ur back!

  • i doubt that. i doubt that very much.

  • oh yea, i bet u a million bucks that i could bash u up.

  • How old are you, 13? Dude, just give it a rest, stop embarrassing yourself.

  • ummmmm 17. i could kick ur ass.

  • Whatever you reckon. Doesn't change the fact that you fail.

  • u think ur all mighty n powerful on the internet but in real life i'd seriously kick ur ass if i got a chance. the last time sum1 under estimated me, i beat them in a arm ressle. that happened ages ago. just imagine what i could do 2 U.

  • An arm wrestle? Ooh I'm so scared. You just don't give up do you? I'm sitting here laughing my ass off, this is just too funny!

  • HA ARM WRESTLE oh we're scared shitless.

  • LMFAO.

  • @dust11inc After having used it myself, it really is shit.

  • Vista is not good? Are you serious? Its fantastic. In fact, I use it on four of my computers at home. Two running Home Premium and the other two using Ultimate.

    And even my AMD Sempron 1.6GHz with 1Gb memory and Radeon 9600 graphics (rated 3.4 WEI) it runs Vista fantastically.

    I never went back to Windows XP. I feel much more secure and Vista is "the most user-friendly OS ever made".

    Macs are different. Those who want back, go ahead. I'm a PC user and its Windows for. It has to be Vista...

  • the only reason of y vista is "good" is becoz it copied so many features that already existed in another OS.

  • True, but thats only because Apple stole the core of MacOS from an operating system which already existed called FreeBSD. Microsoft spent their time coding the NT base from the ground up, henceforth Windows is written using Microsoft's own code. Apple just took the code from an already good operating system, and slapped a user interface on top. Now, who stole what?

  • true but u have 2 remembr that Apple modified a "already" good OS ALOT! When Apple 1st got hands on UNIX there was alot of wrk 2 b done to make it wrk on a Apple comp. Apple mayb werent the 1's that made the core but they made the rest of it.

  • no, FreeBSD was completed long before Apple was around. Not that much work needed to be done, as Apple computers used a RISC CPU, which is what FreeBSD was originally designed for. FreeBSD was created as a RISC flavour for the CISC *nix system. Apple didn't do much at all. They changed a few commands to make the command prompt less useful, and they put a GUI designed by Xerox on top. Apple did barely anything. It was all marketing. It still is.

  • thank god i'm not the only one who knows the truth.

  • for someone who obviously has never touched Vista, you sure have a lot of negative things to say about it. Vista has breadcrumb-style hierarchy, Tiger doesn't. Vista has 4 different sized thumbnail views which you can segregate by type, Tiger doesn't. Vista has a built-in media server feature, Tiger doesn't. Truthfully, there are a million features Vista has where they didn't seem to copy anyone so i don't know how you're coming up with your ridiculous statements.

  • its a bit unfair 2 compare it 2 Tiger. Does vista have a view feature that is anywhere near as cool as cover flow???..NO. Tiger does have front row 1.0, thats a built-in media feature.

  • Tiger doesn't come with front row 1.0 "built in", Leopard does. My friend uses medialink to stream media to his ps3 and you have to pay for that. Cover flow is functionally stupid when you're actually trying to look for a song. I'm a mac user and I never use it- none of my mac friends use it either. And it IS fair to compare Vista to Tiger because Vista came out before Leopard. So if you want me to compare it to Leopard, that means Leopard is the copy-cat.

  • And can you please type with at least a 9th grade English level? It's really hard to read 7-year-old handwriting.

  • You kidding??? Leopards whole user interface concept is to function like iTunes to attract more Windows users.

  • Vista is fine

  • fighissimo

  • hahaha funny if it was shown as the vista ad

  • Cool vista ad! Many disasters!!!

  • Wow. Vista is the same as a burning plane.

  • that was very funny!! I couldn't stop laughing lol

  • Ha! Nice!

  • Har har. Vista suxx. Nice vid.

  • vista suxx?

    then what os do you use, huh?

    don't tell me! leopard?

    god in heaven help us...

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more