You're assuming that the Mongol was Genghis Khan himself. Just be happy that Genghis Khan won his fight against Hannibal Barca and the Lakotas lost this season.
actually the mongol empire was dissolved because the chinese drove them out of china, and the black death in europe caused them to disappear from eastern europe, plus the invasions of japan that got fucked thanks to typhoons. i think it was just a pure coincidence the mongols didnt rule the entire world. the commanche i guess, won because the were 1-1 fighters, and mongols fought as a huge army. mongols were effective, scoring over 100 with every weapon in the simulation
Comanche are warriors as children. They are not a fly of the need group of recently trained civilians. Comanche kids at age 5 have already killed a bear, a moose and wild boar. They know their lands. When you think of going to a declared war with Comanche, think about Sparta and 300
Gun wise back during the white man wars, indians bow and arrow were much faster than muzzle loaders and the indians were better trained.
Okay, so a fucking tribal can beat the one Mongol soldier who peeled off from the group to polish his sword like a retard, why the fuck was he in a forest anyway? Mongols never fought alone and they always fought in groups, plus, if the terrain wasn't to their liking they would RARELY fight on it, not to mention they would never charge headfirst into an obvious trap. "OH LOOK HE WENT INTO A CAVE LET ME JUST BARGE IN I'M SURE HE'S NOT HIDING!!" Deadliest Warrior?
@TheRussianMILF I'm native american, and agree we weren't known ro these types of people thats why the only ones we fought were eachother, we had no idea what a sword was, or a gun for that matter. Buter faster is always better and agility is more effective than brute stength
i think people under estimate the Comanches, they were expert horsemen and had to stack up against firearms,so in some ways maybe their tactics were a little more evolved in combat techniques plus they already knew how to defeat old fashioned weapons, plus the mongol is not invincible, they failed to take over japan with the samurai, or india with the raj put and other Hindu warriors in india.
@Brody400 if the commanche were horsemen they would have an advantage against the U.S because firearms were innacurate. The only reason didn't take Japan was because of a typhoon. No body can win if a typhoon hits them.
the messed with the mongols weapons. they should have had the mongol on horseback with a spear.(like they have used) they should have a better person shooting the arrows.
No, they wouldnt. The Comanche did fight an army,, the US, and they had firearms. They used SunTzus tactics, without reading the book,, some battles are not fight, terrains to be avoided, etc. The show almost always goes to fire power,, fire arms and better firearms, which the Comanche could have used and didn't, and speed, like viking samurai battle. Most marshal arts are all about speed, and overpowering bigger stronger opponents. When a claymore hits, your gonna feel it, but it has to hit.
@JmariolinkJ mongols would win cause every1 mongolian soldier trained with martial art from father to son that made them undefeatable this 1 of the reasons and they always used tactic on every fight and battle if u compare ancient russian army compare to comache russian soldier would win or chinese or persian
Comanche won cause they were more fiercer in battle, because they had to deal with gun-happy cowboys, which is an unfair fight. Being in unfair fights make you more experienced dont you tink so?
First of all, you're talking about an ARMY that conquered half the world. This is a one on one fight. Native Americans were a lot scarcer in numbers that the mongols, so they're naturally gonna be BETTER at fighting one on one. Second, why do you think it took so damn long for Native Americans to be conquered? And some of the tribes still live the way they used to. Native Americans are resilient, swift, stealthy, fast and effective. And GUNS stopped the Native Americans, remember that.
@garrettthompson1024
Tell that to Pancho Villa...LMAO
Heck, I was rooting for Crazy Horse.
*shrugs*
ZECTCustomUnit 5 months ago
@Drevon1349
You're assuming that the Mongol was Genghis Khan himself. Just be happy that Genghis Khan won his fight against Hannibal Barca and the Lakotas lost this season.
ZECTCustomUnit 5 months ago
Thumbs up if you're Comanche or part Comanche! :3
Wowee2012 6 months ago
actually the mongol empire was dissolved because the chinese drove them out of china, and the black death in europe caused them to disappear from eastern europe, plus the invasions of japan that got fucked thanks to typhoons. i think it was just a pure coincidence the mongols didnt rule the entire world. the commanche i guess, won because the were 1-1 fighters, and mongols fought as a huge army. mongols were effective, scoring over 100 with every weapon in the simulation
FamGuy15 7 months ago
Comanche are warriors as children. They are not a fly of the need group of recently trained civilians. Comanche kids at age 5 have already killed a bear, a moose and wild boar. They know their lands. When you think of going to a declared war with Comanche, think about Sparta and 300
Gun wise back during the white man wars, indians bow and arrow were much faster than muzzle loaders and the indians were better trained.
RodneyMcDowell 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"———--/´¯/'´¯/´¯`•_
———-/'/--/—-/—--/¨¯\
——--('(—(—(--- ¯~/'--')
———\ MONGOLS--/
———-'\'WILL ,_---•´
————\ NEVER (
————-\—FALL "_
sergelenify 10 months ago
Okay, so a fucking tribal can beat the one Mongol soldier who peeled off from the group to polish his sword like a retard, why the fuck was he in a forest anyway? Mongols never fought alone and they always fought in groups, plus, if the terrain wasn't to their liking they would RARELY fight on it, not to mention they would never charge headfirst into an obvious trap. "OH LOOK HE WENT INTO A CAVE LET ME JUST BARGE IN I'M SURE HE'S NOT HIDING!!" Deadliest Warrior?
More like deadliest retard.
rupture1212 11 months ago
u have to remeber this show is american and very biased so anything connected with america would be chosen as the winner
adamdd09 11 months ago
@adamdd09 that must be why the green berets lost to the spetsnaz.
Brody400 10 months ago
WTF!!! THE MONGOL SHOULDVE WRECKED THE COMMANCHE!!
TheRussianMILF 1 year ago
@TheRussianMILF I'm native american, and agree we weren't known ro these types of people thats why the only ones we fought were eachother, we had no idea what a sword was, or a gun for that matter. Buter faster is always better and agility is more effective than brute stength
jizmacdacusha 9 months ago
i think people under estimate the Comanches, they were expert horsemen and had to stack up against firearms,so in some ways maybe their tactics were a little more evolved in combat techniques plus they already knew how to defeat old fashioned weapons, plus the mongol is not invincible, they failed to take over japan with the samurai, or india with the raj put and other Hindu warriors in india.
Brody400 1 year ago
@Brody400 if the commanche were horsemen they would have an advantage against the U.S because firearms were innacurate. The only reason didn't take Japan was because of a typhoon. No body can win if a typhoon hits them.
TheMasamune444 1 year ago
@TheMasamune444 Next Deadliest warrior: God vs Mongol
Mongol Weapons: Sword, spear, bow
God weapons: Typhoon, earthquakes, tsunamis
Mongol: ahhhh! *shoot arrow at air* God: Boring! *send Typhoon lift up mongol 2000 m and drown it in the sea*
God wins: 1000
Mongol wins: 0
God is the Deadliest warrior XD!!
BiohazardCrow 1 year ago
the messed with the mongols weapons. they should have had the mongol on horseback with a spear.(like they have used) they should have a better person shooting the arrows.
TheMasamune444 1 year ago
No, they wouldnt. The Comanche did fight an army,, the US, and they had firearms. They used SunTzus tactics, without reading the book,, some battles are not fight, terrains to be avoided, etc. The show almost always goes to fire power,, fire arms and better firearms, which the Comanche could have used and didn't, and speed, like viking samurai battle. Most marshal arts are all about speed, and overpowering bigger stronger opponents. When a claymore hits, your gonna feel it, but it has to hit.
oifmedicm5 1 year ago 8
Comment removed
oifmedicm5 1 year ago
Native Americans go 2-0 along with the Pirates.
ZECTCustomUnit 1 year ago 6
Army on Army, Mongolians would wipe out the Comanche. But yeah, I'll admit, one on one chances are the Comanche will win.
JmariolinkJ 1 year ago
Comment removed
enkhbattsenguun 1 year ago
@JmariolinkJ mongols would win cause every1 mongolian soldier trained with martial art from father to son that made them undefeatable this 1 of the reasons and they always used tactic on every fight and battle if u compare ancient russian army compare to comache russian soldier would win or chinese or persian
enkhbattsenguun 1 year ago
Comanche won cause they were more fiercer in battle, because they had to deal with gun-happy cowboys, which is an unfair fight. Being in unfair fights make you more experienced dont you tink so?
Gahlahad431 1 year ago
we all know who wins in the end... the white man... until the iraq war...
muhaimenrulez 1 year ago
First of all, you're talking about an ARMY that conquered half the world. This is a one on one fight. Native Americans were a lot scarcer in numbers that the mongols, so they're naturally gonna be BETTER at fighting one on one. Second, why do you think it took so damn long for Native Americans to be conquered? And some of the tribes still live the way they used to. Native Americans are resilient, swift, stealthy, fast and effective. And GUNS stopped the Native Americans, remember that.
spiritofthewolves88 1 year ago
mongols conquered half the fucking world
the comanche got ass raped by Americans.
yeah totally accurate, why does Mongolia exist and not Comancheland?
Things happen for a fucking reason.
komina12345 1 year ago