Imaging old galaxies at the extents of the visible universe(12.8 billion light years away) does not suggest primordial galaxies it suggests the idea of seeing galaxies as they were in the past is wrong. Light is a wave spectrum until observed. When the source of the light is observed the wave collapses and instantly transfers the information of what it looks like in the now via quantum entanglement. The light never even travels. The electrons pop into existence right when viewing the source.
@Ananas85 if we never questioned theorys, we would still consider the sun as a golden disc, and we would still consider the world as flat. quantum mechanics are complicated at best, the speed of light is so far the fastest we can observe things going, space itself is expanding faster than the speed of light, soo, yeah
@vamparik Space does not expand "faster than light", it just obeys the inverse sqaure law, where two points expand away and every point is expanding away from every other part, meaning the farther the distance, the faster those points are moving away, but space is actually expanding relatively slow, yet "faster" then the speed of light. However speed of light only applies to particles with mass, because the faster a particle goes the more mass it gains, at speed of light it's mass is *continued*
It's mass approachs infinity, which means it would require infinite energy to accelerate a particle to the speed of light, and more than infinite to accelerate it faster. This doesn't apply to massless particles such as a photon, since they are massless they require no energy to actually accelerate or move, so they are always moving at the speed of light. Only particles with negative mass can exceed the speed of light, IF they exist.
actually the superb music helped me to keep concentrated in the excellent explanation. Perhaps a more scaled version of the EM spectrum was in order. After all visible light is less then 1 million of percent part of the whole spectrum.
I have a question. An often quoted analogy to describe the expansion of the universe is that of an expanding balloon, with points on the balloon representing galaxies. As the balloon expands, the points recede from each other, but doesn't the 'unit' of distance also expand with the balloon, so that the 'distance' between points remain the same? Can anyone care to enlighten me?
Man, what a spectacular presentation! Stunned by the beauty!
grunder20 2 months ago
Imaging old galaxies at the extents of the visible universe(12.8 billion light years away) does not suggest primordial galaxies it suggests the idea of seeing galaxies as they were in the past is wrong. Light is a wave spectrum until observed. When the source of the light is observed the wave collapses and instantly transfers the information of what it looks like in the now via quantum entanglement. The light never even travels. The electrons pop into existence right when viewing the source.
GateMessenger 8 months ago
@GateMessenger instantly transfer information? so you do not believe in einstein or even the speed of light?
Ananas85 4 months ago
@Ananas85 if we never questioned theorys, we would still consider the sun as a golden disc, and we would still consider the world as flat. quantum mechanics are complicated at best, the speed of light is so far the fastest we can observe things going, space itself is expanding faster than the speed of light, soo, yeah
vamparik 3 months ago
@vamparik Space does not expand "faster than light", it just obeys the inverse sqaure law, where two points expand away and every point is expanding away from every other part, meaning the farther the distance, the faster those points are moving away, but space is actually expanding relatively slow, yet "faster" then the speed of light. However speed of light only applies to particles with mass, because the faster a particle goes the more mass it gains, at speed of light it's mass is *continued*
JamesCizuz 3 months ago
@vamparik
*Continued*
It's mass approachs infinity, which means it would require infinite energy to accelerate a particle to the speed of light, and more than infinite to accelerate it faster. This doesn't apply to massless particles such as a photon, since they are massless they require no energy to actually accelerate or move, so they are always moving at the speed of light. Only particles with negative mass can exceed the speed of light, IF they exist.
JamesCizuz 3 months ago
actually the superb music helped me to keep concentrated in the excellent explanation. Perhaps a more scaled version of the EM spectrum was in order. After all visible light is less then 1 million of percent part of the whole spectrum.
mrrn100 8 months ago
@mrrn100 That must be why most college science lectures have an erratic trumpeter brought in.......to help the kids concentrate....lol
spookyben 1 week ago in playlist Gamma Ray Bursts - Death Stars
Good science, bad music
plebshadowofra 10 months ago
The most amazing GRB discovery so far is the incredibly annoying horn section background noise that goes with it.
spookyben 1 year ago 5
i love space
XXxxmacxx 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a question. An often quoted analogy to describe the expansion of the universe is that of an expanding balloon, with points on the balloon representing galaxies. As the balloon expands, the points recede from each other, but doesn't the 'unit' of distance also expand with the balloon, so that the 'distance' between points remain the same? Can anyone care to enlighten me?
maxwellsdaemon7 2 years ago
pretty sure it doesn't. Does the unit of distance expand with the balloon?
PhilipLu3 1 year ago
Gamma rays actually disproves black holes.
QIQrrr 2 years ago
amazing.
bigpotplant 2 years ago
Superb Display. Stanford's Experiments are simply speechless! 5 ofcourse!
dondenildelshultz 3 years ago