oh and by the way, for the sti lovers, I raced a stock sti when my s2k was stock too and i got it by .4 sec. I was on mickey thompson et street radials just to keep up with the all wheel drive system the sti has. But considering that the sti is turbocharged and mine was NA, that says a lot about s2ks...
hey, i just wanted to know what specs you have in the s2k and how many psi... I have a greddy turbo s2k but they wont let me race on the track without a roll cage... I just need this info for approximation... thanks...
@jakerussel so they wont let you race on a track or the drag strip without the roll bar and why is it because its turbo charged and reaches that level of performance that requires a roll bar
@cbeck611 yeah... they said because it is a convertible and they only allow me 13.5 secs. well, i cracked 13.36 with the nitrous alone without the turbo at the moment and they kicked me out... I went back there and the tech guys saw my turbo and nitrous and they automatically said no...
Even a stock S2000 is quick as fuck. That car's just amazing. You get performance, gas millage, reliability, looks, and everything for a decent price.
im sorry the f20c is not the best 4 cyl in the world .. in fact if you look at it its nothing but a horse power engine. theres no torque to it at all. as to wear ej engines are some of the best ballanced engines in the world
my comment said the best 2L, not 2.5L. any retard can make a ton of torque with a bigger engine, look at American engineering. F1 cars don't make much torque, but they can beat the torque-monster trains. make sense?
even the 2L aren't all turbo charged its the format. and yeah f1 cars make a ton of torque look at both the Mclaren , and mercedes amg cars for f1 series. Torque is essential to acceleration. and yes the 2L boxer engine n/a make just as balanced torque and hp.
there is no proof needed for 4G>EJ. im not even going to get into that argument if you don't already know that, you're beyond all reason at that point. and 110hp/L NA, 700+whp on bone stock motor etc etc etc are attributes no subie can claim.
there is not a single advantage. the 4G is better in literally every single way. i couldn't care less why you prefer the inferior EJ, but whatever, all you subie fans just keep the values of EVO's down the slightest bit.
do you know anything about cars??? any turbo car can suffer from those problems. im done arguing with you, you're a lost cause. ignorance is bliss, sorry for trying to show you the light.
the light of what cars that build no torque and even at high compression are incapable of sufficient torque, or how they all have over sized gear ratios, or oh wait how the F20-c is 240hp car with 130 ft lbs of torque at the fly!!! with 35% drive train loss. sorry you have not supplied me with any information you simply have said over and over that subaru sucks with no support, or sufficient data, your simply some guy who just so happens to find videos of cars on the internet . shut your trap
ahahha there are about 4 local 12 second or faster subarus and they've all blown up at LEAST once (all with VERY reputable parts and tunes) and yet we have the worlds 2nd fastest stock turbo EVO (11.2 @ 119). s2000's are reliable as HELL and can take 700whp on a 100.0000% stock motor, plus they are fantastic motors for track cars. YOU DON'T NEED TQ WHEN YOU CAN ALWAYS KEEP THE REVS BETWEEN 6 AND 9K RPM LOL. EJ's are overly complicated to work on (ask me how i know) for no reason. subarus suck.
ive built both the 4g and the Ej25. subaru have a more ballance power band, and i have seen with my own 2 eyes a f20-c turbo blow from 13 psi, they arent bullet proof i hate that rumor. and yo uhave to have torque to accelorate, horse power does not make you accelorate that is torque. your a complete idiot if you think any car will be able to even move without torque
At higher speeds Torque gives way to Hp thats why Hondas have better top end power.
Given the track is longer and the race is longer (like 30 or 40 minutes) with the Honda on high end rpm's the Subaru's Torque and 4wd set up would be to its detriment.
Thats why 2 idetical cars with one a 4wd car set up to the same specs the 4wd would lose i the long run.
In this course when accelaration is the game 4wd & torque counts, in a long race Hp and 2wd wins (less refueling also)
And you're fucking stupid. Seriously, what toolbox would believe that 4G>EJ when 4G isn't even used anymore? Seriously dude, do some fucking research instead of posting lies & baseless comments. It's annoying to read posts from people who have no idea what the fuck they are talking about.
@akabane1984 hahahahhahahahha I'm just sitting here laughing. Justtttt laughing. Think whatever you need to think so you can sleep at night, doesn't bother me.
1:EJs (WRX, Twin Turbo, & STi) can also hold 700+whp. However, just like the 4G, it will last VERY shortly. End result? Even (Both engines have been reported to hold that much power before exploding).
2:4Gs have higher CR than EJ, meaning that a mistake in raising the boost will be very costly. Raise the boost in an EJ & experience very little faults.
3:In terms of reliability, EJ definitely takes the win. Not even a contest. EJ is also one of the most reliable engines on earth.
of course an s2000 will pull in a STi, but it is sorry that an s2000 have to spend so much money just to keep up or maybe beat an STI or Evo....just get a real turbo car and stop talking smack..... remember awd turbo cars are a benchmark on performance not an s2000
The S2000 is usually 3 to 4 thousand dollars cheaper (MSRP). I like it the way it is (stock). And it does keep up with evos and sti, just not the new ones. And I have already installed two turbos with megasquirts and other whistles for under $1500. So...
lol this videos a joke. Ive seen stock STis into the 13.2 range. the s2000 with a turbo ran a 13.5. My guess is its a bone stock WRX with some cheap gold wheels and an STI trunklid.
@xlflattop well use logic, s2000 = 4 cilynder that needs to rev high to get off and STI = AWD gets off like hell, seeing the S2000 get off that much it sure had slicks and sure had way much more than that over the STI that has 60 more HP stock
@xlflattop if the driver is decent i know for a fact that the sti is stock. so shut the fuck up ricer. my buddy has a stock sti and it ran 13.3 just on more boost. so fuck off fag
dude that sti driver suck he ran a 14.5 thats a time of a stock wrx s2000 ran what a stock sti runs better driver in the sti and he would have won but nice run for the s2k
s2k FTW :)
calik23 1 month ago
oh and by the way, for the sti lovers, I raced a stock sti when my s2k was stock too and i got it by .4 sec. I was on mickey thompson et street radials just to keep up with the all wheel drive system the sti has. But considering that the sti is turbocharged and mine was NA, that says a lot about s2ks...
jakerussel 1 year ago
@jakerussel it sure does s2k's have the best 4 cyl. in my opinion
cbeck611 1 year ago
hey, i just wanted to know what specs you have in the s2k and how many psi... I have a greddy turbo s2k but they wont let me race on the track without a roll cage... I just need this info for approximation... thanks...
jakerussel 1 year ago
@jakerussel so they wont let you race on a track or the drag strip without the roll bar and why is it because its turbo charged and reaches that level of performance that requires a roll bar
cbeck611 1 year ago
@cbeck611 yeah... they said because it is a convertible and they only allow me 13.5 secs. well, i cracked 13.36 with the nitrous alone without the turbo at the moment and they kicked me out... I went back there and the tech guys saw my turbo and nitrous and they automatically said no...
jakerussel 1 year ago
Even a stock S2000 is quick as fuck. That car's just amazing. You get performance, gas millage, reliability, looks, and everything for a decent price.
lhfdabest1 1 year ago
the fuking puto on the STI don't now shit no sabe manejar el puto 14-5 que paso my Toyota corola cand du beter.....
pupuso13 2 years ago
an Sti running a 14.5?! thats just sad!
Viking445 2 years ago
sube's don't know how to make NA power PERIOD!!!!!!
lakerhater4 2 years ago
>14 sec for any STi = sucky ass driver
zmanoside 2 years ago
STi's time higher than 14 sec here in my city, but thats because we are 2600m over sea lvl.
nikolastwelve 2 years ago
One thing the S2k can say to the STi.... 'Taste my dust'!!!!! :D
sosu88 2 years ago 9
IN fact I have proof..... on Youtube you can look up these names for it...
1. Impreza STI vs S2000
2. 2006 STI vs Unknown Honda S2000
3. Turbo Honda s2k vs Modded 06 Subaru STi s2000
all these videos show the S2000 winning...
Zeroflat24... get your facts straight before you start saying things...
roarrasengan3 2 years ago 2
subaru is a 4 banger if im not correct, isnt the s2000 a 6 banger?
DoYouWannaDiee 2 years ago
no. it's the best 2.0L 4cyl in the world
carmodifire 2 years ago 13
im sorry the f20c is not the best 4 cyl in the world .. in fact if you look at it its nothing but a horse power engine. theres no torque to it at all. as to wear ej engines are some of the best ballanced engines in the world
unincideal 2 years ago
ej's have turbo's. give a f20c the same psi as the ej, the s2k will win every time.
carmodifire 2 years ago 3
um no they don't... i have a naturally aspirated ej25... i still put out more torque on a dino than a f20c.. wow just proved how dumb you are
unincideal 2 years ago
my comment said the best 2L, not 2.5L. any retard can make a ton of torque with a bigger engine, look at American engineering. F1 cars don't make much torque, but they can beat the torque-monster trains. make sense?
carmodifire 2 years ago 2
even the 2L aren't all turbo charged its the format. and yeah f1 cars make a ton of torque look at both the Mclaren , and mercedes amg cars for f1 series. Torque is essential to acceleration. and yes the 2L boxer engine n/a make just as balanced torque and hp.
unincideal 2 years ago
the EJ sucksssss 4G63>F20C>>>>>>EJ20/25/whatever
kramerbuccs24 2 years ago
and your supporting proof proving the torquless overrated wonders ?
unincideal 2 years ago
there is no proof needed for 4G>EJ. im not even going to get into that argument if you don't already know that, you're beyond all reason at that point. and 110hp/L NA, 700+whp on bone stock motor etc etc etc are attributes no subie can claim.
kramerbuccs24 2 years ago 2
you my friend are extremely ignorant, do some research understand the engines and production of power before you claim one is better than another
unincideal 2 years ago
whatever you say buddy. i wish i could be as knowledgeable as you, liking your dumpy ass subarus.
kramerbuccs24 2 years ago
you still have not given one reason why there so horrible, your just biast cuz you dont realize there bonuses
unincideal 2 years ago
there is not a single advantage. the 4G is better in literally every single way. i couldn't care less why you prefer the inferior EJ, but whatever, all you subie fans just keep the values of EVO's down the slightest bit.
kramerbuccs24 2 years ago
maybe because if you drop boost in an with a 4g, or have a limp surge, a geo will beat you no matter how much boost your pushing
unincideal 2 years ago
do you know anything about cars??? any turbo car can suffer from those problems. im done arguing with you, you're a lost cause. ignorance is bliss, sorry for trying to show you the light.
kramerbuccs24 2 years ago
the light of what cars that build no torque and even at high compression are incapable of sufficient torque, or how they all have over sized gear ratios, or oh wait how the F20-c is 240hp car with 130 ft lbs of torque at the fly!!! with 35% drive train loss. sorry you have not supplied me with any information you simply have said over and over that subaru sucks with no support, or sufficient data, your simply some guy who just so happens to find videos of cars on the internet . shut your trap
unincideal 2 years ago
ahahha there are about 4 local 12 second or faster subarus and they've all blown up at LEAST once (all with VERY reputable parts and tunes) and yet we have the worlds 2nd fastest stock turbo EVO (11.2 @ 119). s2000's are reliable as HELL and can take 700whp on a 100.0000% stock motor, plus they are fantastic motors for track cars. YOU DON'T NEED TQ WHEN YOU CAN ALWAYS KEEP THE REVS BETWEEN 6 AND 9K RPM LOL. EJ's are overly complicated to work on (ask me how i know) for no reason. subarus suck.
kramerbuccs24 2 years ago 2
ive built both the 4g and the Ej25. subaru have a more ballance power band, and i have seen with my own 2 eyes a f20-c turbo blow from 13 psi, they arent bullet proof i hate that rumor. and yo uhave to have torque to accelorate, horse power does not make you accelorate that is torque. your a complete idiot if you think any car will be able to even move without torque
unincideal 2 years ago
At higher speeds Torque gives way to Hp thats why Hondas have better top end power.
Given the track is longer and the race is longer (like 30 or 40 minutes) with the Honda on high end rpm's the Subaru's Torque and 4wd set up would be to its detriment.
Thats why 2 idetical cars with one a 4wd car set up to the same specs the 4wd would lose i the long run.
In this course when accelaration is the game 4wd & torque counts, in a long race Hp and 2wd wins (less refueling also)
crxdelsolsir 2 years ago
1:Stock EVOs do NOT hit the 1/4th in 11.2 seconds.
2:EJs are NOT hard to work on. They are actually quite easy.
3:S2Ks can NOT handle 700hp of boost. Not with an 11.5:1CR.
4:You shouldn't HAVE to rev an engine to 9K rpm for power. That's asking for trouble.
akabane1984 1 year ago
@akabane1984 You are just hopeless. 100% hopeless.
kramerbuccs24 1 year ago
@akabane1984 your a fucking idiot
BlueMetalS2k 1 year ago
And you're fucking stupid. Seriously, what toolbox would believe that 4G>EJ when 4G isn't even used anymore? Seriously dude, do some fucking research instead of posting lies & baseless comments. It's annoying to read posts from people who have no idea what the fuck they are talking about.
akabane1984 1 year ago
@akabane1984 hahahahhahahahha I'm just sitting here laughing. Justtttt laughing. Think whatever you need to think so you can sleep at night, doesn't bother me.
kramerbuccs24 1 year ago
Comment removed
kramerbuccs24 1 year ago
LOL @ 4G>EJ!
1:EJs (WRX, Twin Turbo, & STi) can also hold 700+whp. However, just like the 4G, it will last VERY shortly. End result? Even (Both engines have been reported to hold that much power before exploding).
2:4Gs have higher CR than EJ, meaning that a mistake in raising the boost will be very costly. Raise the boost in an EJ & experience very little faults.
3:In terms of reliability, EJ definitely takes the win. Not even a contest. EJ is also one of the most reliable engines on earth.
akabane1984 1 year ago
it don't need much torque..its light and revs very high...
TheMugenboy 2 years ago
@carmodifire Actually Mitsubishis' 2.0L 4G63 is the best in terms of power. The F series is the most powerful N/A though.
zero2skater2forever 1 month ago
of course an s2000 will pull in a STi, but it is sorry that an s2000 have to spend so much money just to keep up or maybe beat an STI or Evo....just get a real turbo car and stop talking smack..... remember awd turbo cars are a benchmark on performance not an s2000
bulbaran24 2 years ago
The S2000 is usually 3 to 4 thousand dollars cheaper (MSRP). I like it the way it is (stock). And it does keep up with evos and sti, just not the new ones. And I have already installed two turbos with megasquirts and other whistles for under $1500. So...
Renatubie 2 years ago 3
lol?
nikolastwelve 2 years ago
An STI comes with a turbo already... also this video is not a joke if you go look up S2000 vs STI there are a few videos of the S2000 winning...
roarrasengan3 2 years ago
lol this videos a joke. Ive seen stock STis into the 13.2 range. the s2000 with a turbo ran a 13.5. My guess is its a bone stock WRX with some cheap gold wheels and an STI trunklid.
zeroflat24 2 years ago
Hmm signaficantly modded car vs stock.
jaydnisevil 3 years ago
how do you know that the sti is a stock oh thats right you don't
xlflattop 3 years ago 8
Well guessing that becuase the average 1/4 mile for a stock STI is around 13.5 smartarse
jaydnisevil 3 years ago
no...the STi driver just sucks. plain and simple. 14.5? press the little button that says replay.
v8subie 3 years ago 2
14.5 is a shit time for a sti.. stock or not. I pulled that with a stock wrx.
aspen02STi 1 year ago 2
@xlflattop well use logic, s2000 = 4 cilynder that needs to rev high to get off and STI = AWD gets off like hell, seeing the S2000 get off that much it sure had slicks and sure had way much more than that over the STI that has 60 more HP stock
Astidcrisse 1 year ago
Comment removed
Astidcrisse 1 year ago
@xlflattop if the driver is decent i know for a fact that the sti is stock. so shut the fuck up ricer. my buddy has a stock sti and it ran 13.3 just on more boost. so fuck off fag
xStealthxSniperx 1 year ago
@xStealthxSniperx so thats not stock then if he has more boost tool...sti driver was shit is awd shoulda had the jump
BlueMetalS2k 1 year ago
@jaydnisevil STOCK STI? son, those cars come loaded. its only fair that the s2000 has a turbo.
krolmariusz 7 months ago
@jaydnisevil Because STI's arent stock turbo or anything..
TheoPalmones 6 months ago
dude that sti driver suck he ran a 14.5 thats a time of a stock wrx s2000 ran what a stock sti runs better driver in the sti and he would have won but nice run for the s2k
mustafajdm 3 years ago
It must be the rally blue paint. Long live the S2000!
atcrunch 3 years ago
WATS UP CAM!!!!!!!!!!!
LittlePoisen 3 years ago
bob and braden was that you diven this is cam
digital17489 4 years ago