"Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party have given us skyrocketing deficits, and astoundingly a doubled national debt. How is it that the party of balanced budgets, with control of the White House and Senate, accumulated red ink greater than all previous administrations put together?"- Ron Paul.
"Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party have given us skyrocketing deficits, and astoundingly a doubled national debt. How is it that the party of balanced budgets, with control of the White House and Senate, accumulated red ink greater than all previous administrations put together?"- Ron Paul campaigners; Stop with the stupid videos comparing Dr. Paul. to reagan. Ron Paul, you still got my vote though.
Ron Paul is the modern Reagan in so many ways. Just like Reagan he preaches small government, lower taxes, spending cuts etc, and just like Paul it took Reagan several attempts at the nomination in order to get recognized. The difference though is on the military, instead of flexing the military muscle to help end the cold war like Reagan did, Ron Paul wants to get us out of the middle east wars, and rightfully so.
@Spjungen Ron Paul once said:"Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party have given us skyrocketing deficits, and astoundingly a doubled national debt. How is it that the party of balanced budgets, with control of the White House and Senate, accumulated red ink greater than all previous administrations put together?"- Ron Paul.
"Reagan and the Republican Party have given us skyrocketing deficits, massive monetary inflation, indiscriminate military spending, irrational and unconstitutional foreign policy, zooming foreign aid, the exaltation of international banking and the attack on our personal liberties and privacies." -- Ron Paul
@QuietusEpicus Fuck off...Reagan never did shit to you. One of the best Presidents this country ever had. And Ron Paul was a HUGE supporter of Reagan. In fact he was one of the original supporters of Reagan.
@williwo You had to live through LBJ, Nixon, Ford & Carter and experienced how messed up the country was in 1980 to really appreciate Ronald Reagan. When he was shot they gave him ice cold blood and damaged his brain, but Reagan still believed in WE THE PEOPLE. The mistakes blamed on Reagan can be laid at the door of Skull & Bones Globalist and Anti-American New World Order supporter George H.W. Bush. Reagan saved us from what we're going through now, which was starting in the 1970s.
@williwo Ron Paul himself during the debates was attacked for writing Reagan a letter of regret for supporting him, Ron Paul admitted to it. All the republicans trying to compare themselves to Reagan are pathetic. Ron Paul knows this too.
@QuietusEpicus So how come Ron Paul recently boasted of his supporting Reagan in one of his most recent commercials? The same commercial attacked Rick Perry for supporting Al Gore. At the end of the commercial, Ron Paul gave his approval.
@williwo do your own research and dont just follow stupid adds. As Ron Paul once said "Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party have given us skyrocketing deficits, and astoundingly a doubled national debt. How is it that the party of balanced budgets, with control of the White House and Senate, accumulated red ink greater than all previous administrations put together?"- Ron Paul
Reagan was strong-armed by special interest--all presidents throughout history have been. It was under his administration that I ever recall feeling safe in America. Now because we've stirred the hornet's nest around the world, it's a "future uncertain" status.
There is only two People who can slip into the shoes Reagan took off, Those two are Ron Paul and/or Miss. Sara Pelin. But nothing will Change in America until the People Read and Understand NEHEMIAH 4:4-23 and PSALM 149:6-9 and then ACT. ,, God Bless, oldgrapeape
@DutchsMaria no, he was an activist and a genius. Clinton took his fiscal credit though because his economy plans started kicking in while Clinton was president.
@PipersGrip oh I got it, like the homelessness on our streets ( by closing mental hospitals) and the great price we paid for starwars ( a total failure).
The Reagan administration's friendly policy towards Saddam Hussein During the Reagan years, the U.S. offered significant support to Iraq, including weapons components, military intelligence, and even some of the ingredients for manufacturing biological weapons like anthrax
@DutchsMaria What does that have to do with his fiscal policy? Can't deny it can you? Wanna talk about Clinton's reign and what he did wrong? I have a lot.
What was so fiscally conservative about the starwars program? Or his Military spending. I was behind the iron curtain in 1974...communism was already breaking down its own society!!!!!!!!!
Ron Paul said "i was on a plane with Ronald Reagan and he told me that when a great country stops backing their currency with gold they cease to be a great country"
You sir are correct Reagan changed he was responcable for the Japaneze flooding our auto market and destroying America's auto industry, Also when he took office after Jimmy Carter our National debt was one trillion when he left office it was at 4 trillion. The Ronald Reagan of the sixties was a differant man by the eighties. But I love these old video's.
through us into further debt? How do you think Mr. Clinton got rid of it so easily? Not by taxation of the rich, He cut the defense spending which Reagan and Bush would have cut some to get rid of the deficit but by no where near how much clinton did. (More than half the military budget/personnel was cut). Reagan decreased inflation, interest rates, lowered taxes which didnt decrease tax revenue. He also talked aout the military industrial complex. The cold war was ended by his policies.
Increased government spending by the democratic house with high federal interest rates, (Reagan wanted to get rid of the uselss Dept. of Education and Dept. of Energy and many more government programs and useless spending that i can go into if needed but research will help the ignorant.), and Reagan had to up defense spending to break the Soviets.
@an50331 if you happen to live under your rock all of your life the Soviet Union was around during his presidency and democrats in congress were the ones that wouldn't let him cut spending and shrink govt. He did the best he could. Just look at today how hard it is for the dems and repubs to compromise on anything
Some say Ronald Reagan was not as good as he sounded because the gov. grew and deficit went up when he was president.
Remember, the president has limited power under the Constitution. When Reagan ran for president half the Republicans in power didn't want him. when he became president, he had to work with a Democrat congress and an unfriendly press.
I think he did the best he could with what he had. If Ron Paul had become President he would have a hard time.
am amazed that he pronounced "totalinarianism" properly...much have had a good acting coach...O...wait...i meant speech writer...wait, no, i meant acting coach...ummm...errrr....
Reagan keeps looking down to read his speech. Those were not his words. Obviouly, he was reading the words of Ron Paul. President B. Hussein Obama speaks from his heart and never looks down. He is genuine and a true savior that is now trying to correct the wrongs of the racist past. Congress should outlaw the Republican Party and throw their leaders in prison for all the evil they have created in this world. Lets make the Democratic Party the only party of the USA. Imprison all who don't join.
Ron Paul should FINALLY tell his LOST party (what's left of it anyway) to SHOVE it (!) & go INDEPENDENT - to GROW the movement which DOES have BROAD support BUT would (eventually) have MUCH MORE without that TOXIC "R" tag. Not only that, but the VAST MAJORITY of Republicans will simply NEVER get it! They literally JUST CAN'T SEE into that (libertarian) window. They can't think "OUTSIDE the BOX".
FACE IT, they are by & large INCAPABLE of seeing BEYOND "Reagan" (CREDIT CARD) "conservatism".
People who loved Reagan LOVED him. People who hated him HATED him. But, there is no questioning that he LOVED this country, and was willing to do whatever was required of him to preserve the IDEA of a free and sovereign country.
There is a delicate "salt" of prophecy in this speech - the "somewhere to run to" example of the Cuban. Where do we go when this experiment falls?
As far as social, domestic, and constitutional issues I think the two are VERY close to one another. Foreign policy is another story. Reagan knew that we were in the midst of a third World War, and it wasn't time to back down. If Ron Paul were in Reagan's position he would be more likely to practice detente than roll back.
Reagan wasn't a perfect man, but he was certainly better than G.W. Bush! This video tells me that a chance to improve things was thrown away in 1964 and that very few people learned from history.
Now it looks like another chance is being thrown away in 2008 with the "promotion" of John McCain. He's part of the problem called big government that inevitably bankrupts any country that doesn't put a stop to it.
The amount of wealth produced during this seven year period was stupendous - some $30 trillion worth of goods and services. Again, it was a world record. Never before had so much wealth been produced during a comparable period. According to a recent study, net asset values - including stocks,
bonds and real estate - went up by more than $5 trillion between 1982 and 1989, an increase of roughly 50 percent.
Never before had so many jobs been created during a comparable time period. The new jobs covered the entire spectrum of work, and more than half of them paid more than $20,000 a year. As total employment grew to 119.5 million, the rate of unemployment fell to slightly over 5 percent, the lowest level in 15 years. Creation of wealth.
The two key measures that mark a depression or expansion are jobs and production. Let's look at the records that were set. Creation of jobs. From November 1982, when President Ronald Reagan's new economic program was beginning to take effect, to November 1989, 18.7 million new jobs were created. It was a world record:
Ronald Reagan knew that Ron Paul was a special man. Reagan's Charisma, and Ron Paul's understanding of the government would make the greatest politician ever to walk this planet we call earth.
We don't know whether historians will call it the Great Expansion of the 1980's or Reagan's Great Expansion, but we do know from official economic statistics that the seven year period from 1982 to 1989 was the greatest, consistent burst of economic activity ever seen in the U.S. In fact, it was the greatest economic expansion the world has ever seen - in any country, at any time.
H t t p colon slash slash query dot nytimes dot com / gst / fullpage dot h tml ? res = 9C0CE1DC153BF934A25752C0A966958260 (the new york times here people) The Reagan Boom -- "Greatest Ever" MARTIN ANDERSON, A SENIOR FELLOW OF THE HOOVER INSTITUTION, AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY Published: January 17, 1990 (over 2 years after Reagan's term)
Yes Clintons was worse because while Reagan lied for our survival from foreign invaders Clintons was only about self-serving gratification. Period. I don't think anyone's liberty benefited from Clintons giving her a money shot.
I love how Clinton supporters like to trivialize Clintons blow job and follow up weeks of lying directly in the faces of the American media, having the gall to point his finger in our faces and while red in the face from shouting it was all party politics that everyone else was lying. It took knowing that his seed drenched the blue dress for him to finally find God as it were and cum clean. To bad the many other deaths he was responsible for could not have been as easily proved
This fundamental conflict between the First and Fourteenth Amendments, coupled with the boundless capacity of the Internet, calls for an exploration of solutions that re-evaluate the expansive protection of hate speech in existing constitutional precedent. Until a more proper balance is established between the private interest in free expression and the interest of the state in preventing hate crimes, the current protections given to hate speech will continue to be subject to debate.
While the First Amendment guarantees a freedom of speech, no right is absolute if it infringes on other rights guaranteed under the Constitution. It has been suggested that hate speech is inconsistent with the principle of equality established by the Fourteenth Amendment. If the Fourteenth Amendment is to embody an antidiscrimination principle, then anything that supports and further perpetuates racial inequality should be regulated.
In Reno v. ACLU, the Court held that "the interest in encouraging freedom of expression in a democratic society outweighs any theoretical but unproven benefit of censorship. This approach has its detractors, however; former Vice President Al Gore, among others, has contended that the existing judicial and regulatory structures are no longer appropriate in the context of the hate speech issue.
Furthermore, the Internet has served as an important recruitment tool for these individuals and groups.
The dangers regarding hate speech through the use of the Internet are evident. There is a fine line between the exchange of values and ideas and the perpetuation of hate in the form of degradation and violence. Despite this fine distinction, the Supreme Court has continued to protect online hate speech based on rights guaranteed under the First Amendment.
With the increasingly widespread use of the Internet, however, individuals and hate groups are able to promote hateful conduct and speech inexpensively and easily while simultaneously reinforcing each other's hateful convictions. The Internet also allows for the opportunity not only to post messages, but also to engage in conversation through chat rooms.
The features that make the Internet so unique have increasingly been manipulated to benefit the needs of those who spread hate-filled propaganda. Persons who display various kinds of hate are able to relay these feelings to others on newsgroups. Prior to the Internet, hate groups spread their propaganda through written materials, in a concerted effort to connect with others who shared the same beliefs.
The Internet has been and will continue to be a medium that allows individuals to interact, research, and conduct business with ease and speed. The vast majority of Americans do not need regulations to provide standards of appropriate or inappropriate behavior in cyberspace. There remains a small percentage of individuals, however, who need some type of regulation to prevent them from infringing upon other rights that individuals hold so dear.
It will then examine how this structure limits the government's ability to regulate hate speech on the Internet. This section will also explore other legal means that are being used to regulate hate speech. Finally, it will conclude by taking a look at alternative techniques that are being used to protect individuals from hate speech. Examining the Problem: The Need for Additional Regulation of Hateful Cyberspeech
Secondly, hate-filled speech may go beyond simply altering an individual's thoughts and may in fact lead to crimes of death and destruction arising from the exposure to such ideas. This Comment will attempt to illustrate the need for increased regulation of hate speech on the Internet by examining three facets of this debate. It will first examine existing First Amendment precedent dealing with freedom of expression issues generally.
The danger of free speech in cyberspace crossing over to become language that perpetuates hatred and provokes violence is a very real threat. This threat manifests itself in two primary forms. First, young Internet users who may be easily influenced are exposed to hate-filled ideals and values, often without any regulation or guidance.
I urge everyone seeing someone posting hate speech to Google department of homeland security and list who stated the hate speech along with which video it was posted. There is an anti-american boiler room operation which can been seen if you researched enough of the Reagan posting pages. Free speech is protected, hate speech is a crime that needs to be reported.
Funny... Wrong Paul has only 4 delegates. Romney and Giulianni were true conservatives. Same polocies as Regan. Lower taxes, offense on enemies, better security, better boarder security. Look at the other's speeches, very few differences from both Paul and the other republicans compared to Regan... Pual wants to leave Iraq which IS NOT CONSERVAYTIVE. why is he losing? Because real conservatives see through him.
As the national security of the United States has become increasingly important in recent months, the debate regarding the censorship of hate speech has again arisen. While many individuals remain wary of infringing upon First Amendment rights through the regulation of hate speech in cyberspace, some suggest that the expansive and pervasive nature of the Internet calls for such regulation.
Americans have been forced to question whether hate-filled online rhetoric is simply the harmless exercise of free speech or is a preventable catalyst of illegal conduct. The death and destruction caused by terrorists who listened to and adopted anti-American views are reminders that speech can often spur dangerous actions in response.
If lowering taxes doesn't work, than why did we get an economic surplus when Regan was president? You need to learn history stupid. Besides, we're not in a resestion.
Low taxes are great! But the problem WAS (and is) SPENDING. There were NO surpluses during the 80's - lol. Much like the current administration, there was only massive deficit spending year after year. And the "liberal" congress even spent LESS than "conservative" Reagan asked for! The 80's is when the deficits started to get completely out of control.
Anybody can live like a king if they just max out all of their credit cards. Very unethical to leave the bill for the NEXT guy to pay off.
The federal deficits did not begin to shrink until 1993 (Bill Clinton's first year) - resulting in first surplus in many DECADES in 1998. The surpluses continued . . . 1999, 2000, 2001 - until George W. Bush took office.
I loved a lot of things in the 80's too! What does that have to do with anything? lol
Information on federal deficits (surpluses) is not that hard to find. Try Google (or a new school)!
Along with this tremendous opportunity, however, comes the threat of abuse. With the increase in the number of people online, a significant percentage of the country's population is exposed to an increasing number of expressions of bigotry and hate that are readily available on the Internet. Following the tragic events which occurred in the United States on September 11, 2001, the threat of violence due to hate-based ideas and values has become a pressing reality.
With respect to "the Gipper", who also had some very "libertarian" views, Ron Paul would be MUCH stronger in regard to spending and fiscal discipline. Reagan always asked for more $ than even the "liberal" congress actually spent. That would NOT happen with President Ron Paul. Sure, it would be nice if RP had some of Reagan's communication skills, but when you add it all up, Ron Paul's message is much stronger than Reagan's.
The sad truth is that his own party didn't even recognize his value until after the fact. They constantly worked against him. It looks like they are up to the same tactics with Ron Paul. We cannot wait for Washington to recognize a good leader. It is up to us. "Down with them all except for Ron Paul!"
Please donate on Jan 21, Martin Luther King day, this month's money bomb. Sign up at FreeAtLast2008. com. Donate at RonPaul2008. com. Huckabee & McCain must drop out soon, they're out of cash, we keep beating Rudy and got 2nd in Nevada but have a lot of work ahead of us as the media ignores us but with wars, inflation and loss of liberty we need Dr. Paul badly, so spread the word, show support with a bumbersticker yard sign and t-shirt, vote in the primaries and get involved with a local meetup.
Yes, Ron and Ronald are exactly the same on all of the issues. I guess we now know who the real republican is today. And the others claim to be like Ronald Reagan. Hah! They (Romney, Huckabee, Thompson, McCain and Gulliani) must be joking if they think they are true republicans and can hold a candle to Ron Paul.
Ron Paul is the only true Republican in this race. The rest are RINO -- but unfortunately, as primary results are showing, so are the party members. I'm still with the GOP, but I'm getting pretty sick of it.
And did you notice when Reagan died the press made sure they only played excerpts from within the first minute of this speech, they dared not share any other part, similar to Fox News editing out Ron Paul's answer to their smear "electibility" question in the January 10th debate when they rebroadcasted.
as much as Reagan wants to believe he is a small government, fiscal conservative, he really did wonders to advance the big government neocon movement.
are you kidding me !!!! Reagan is a devil and he recieved cocaine from Nicaragua,shipped to the cia to crack created by the cia and placed in los angeles in 1983.He was the most evil deceptive man known to man!!!and this is no conspiracy check out reagan and crack!!!
147 Franklin D. Roosevelt (D) 132 Harry Truman (D) 122 Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) 174 John F. Kennedy (D) 126 Lyndon B. Johnson (D) 155 Richard M. Nixon (R) 121 Gerald Ford (R) 175 James E. Carter (D) 105 Ronald Reagan (R) 099 George HW Bush (R) 182 William J. Clinton (D) 091 George W. Bush (R) Bush.. LOWEST Reagan was a GREAT President. Who do you want? Rudy the Crossdresser?
I remember the Iran/ Contra Senate hearings; And at the time I believed Ronny Ray-gun when he said that he was "out of the loop" but his V.P. daddy Bush wasn't; and either were most of the carry overs ( Cheney, Rumsfeld,Poindexter,etc.) from 41's administration.
He wasan actor, and he was playing "the President" for these Neo-cons.
Correct. And he was a dummy. A man of no particular intelligence. A low level Hollywood actor, the head of the actor's union that ratted on his membership for the FBI...
Ron Paul is a doctor, an economist, he's a well read guy, quite smart.
Do you really thing Ronnie wrote his own speeches? lol...he read the teleprompter...the ones that had script on them composed by the GE brain trust that he sold himself to after he became persona non grata in Hollywood.
This has been flagged as spam show
"Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party have given us skyrocketing deficits, and astoundingly a doubled national debt. How is it that the party of balanced budgets, with control of the White House and Senate, accumulated red ink greater than all previous administrations put together?"- Ron Paul.
QuietusEpicus 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party have given us skyrocketing deficits, and astoundingly a doubled national debt. How is it that the party of balanced budgets, with control of the White House and Senate, accumulated red ink greater than all previous administrations put together?"- Ron Paul campaigners; Stop with the stupid videos comparing Dr. Paul. to reagan. Ron Paul, you still got my vote though.
QuietusEpicus 6 days ago
Ron Paul is the modern Reagan in so many ways. Just like Reagan he preaches small government, lower taxes, spending cuts etc, and just like Paul it took Reagan several attempts at the nomination in order to get recognized. The difference though is on the military, instead of flexing the military muscle to help end the cold war like Reagan did, Ron Paul wants to get us out of the middle east wars, and rightfully so.
Spjungen 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Spjungen Ron Paul once said:"Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party have given us skyrocketing deficits, and astoundingly a doubled national debt. How is it that the party of balanced budgets, with control of the White House and Senate, accumulated red ink greater than all previous administrations put together?"- Ron Paul.
Stop comparing Paul to Jerkoff Reagan.
QuietusEpicus 6 days ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ronald reagon sucked, ron paul sucks
Godvernment 2 months ago
@Godvernment And you're a douchenozzle ^^
Spjungen 1 month ago
The problem with Reagan is that once he got into office he GREW the government.
I worry that Paul is giving people the same empty promises.
MoneyIsSilver 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MoneyIsSilver Ronald Reagan couldn't shrink the govt because the congress was controlled by democrats so he had to compromise
agentmyles451 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Reagan and the Republican Party have given us skyrocketing deficits, massive monetary inflation, indiscriminate military spending, irrational and unconstitutional foreign policy, zooming foreign aid, the exaltation of international banking and the attack on our personal liberties and privacies." -- Ron Paul
retrop75 4 months ago
That was amazing.
DavidGHayes91 4 months ago
Fuck Ronald Reagan, he is a hypocrit liar. I always liked Ron Paul though...
QuietusEpicus 5 months ago
@QuietusEpicus Fuck off...Reagan never did shit to you. One of the best Presidents this country ever had. And Ron Paul was a HUGE supporter of Reagan. In fact he was one of the original supporters of Reagan.
williwo 1 month ago
GooglFascists 3 weeks ago
@williwo Ron Paul himself during the debates was attacked for writing Reagan a letter of regret for supporting him, Ron Paul admitted to it. All the republicans trying to compare themselves to Reagan are pathetic. Ron Paul knows this too.
QuietusEpicus 1 week ago
@QuietusEpicus So how come Ron Paul recently boasted of his supporting Reagan in one of his most recent commercials? The same commercial attacked Rick Perry for supporting Al Gore. At the end of the commercial, Ron Paul gave his approval.
williwo 1 week ago
@williwo Ron Paul is using his "Reagan ties" to gain a bit of points for his campaign. This is hypocritical of Paul, but he is a politician...
QuietusEpicus 6 days ago
Comment removed
QuietusEpicus 6 days ago
Comment removed
QuietusEpicus 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@williwo do your own research and dont just follow stupid adds. As Ron Paul once said "Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party have given us skyrocketing deficits, and astoundingly a doubled national debt. How is it that the party of balanced budgets, with control of the White House and Senate, accumulated red ink greater than all previous administrations put together?"- Ron Paul
QuietusEpicus 6 days ago
Join the REVOLUTION!
larryjoehoffman 5 months ago
Reagan was strong-armed by special interest--all presidents throughout history have been. It was under his administration that I ever recall feeling safe in America. Now because we've stirred the hornet's nest around the world, it's a "future uncertain" status.
katnap72 7 months ago
To bad foreclosures on farms and private property started their sharp upward trend under Reagan.
peasantsoul 8 months ago
That should read Ron Paul sounds like Ronald Reagan. Just sayin
Logoned 9 months ago
I thought Reagan was responsible for alot of the deregulation with large banks?
Trox118 10 months ago
@Trox118 No, that was Barney Frank and Chris Dodd
bishopm5 4 months ago
There is only two People who can slip into the shoes Reagan took off, Those two are Ron Paul and/or Miss. Sara Pelin. But nothing will Change in America until the People Read and Understand NEHEMIAH 4:4-23 and PSALM 149:6-9 and then ACT. ,, God Bless, oldgrapeape
oldgrapeape 1 year ago
@oldgrapeape do not belittle Ron Paul or Ronald Reagan by comparing them to Sara Palin ! SHE CAN NOT FILL THOSE SHOES BUDDY !!
MrShawn815 1 year ago
Did Ronald Reagan just said the things people wanted to hear, like any candidate for President?
DutchsMaria 1 year ago
@DutchsMaria no, he was an activist and a genius. Clinton took his fiscal credit though because his economy plans started kicking in while Clinton was president.
PipersGrip 1 year ago
@PipersGrip oh I got it, like the homelessness on our streets ( by closing mental hospitals) and the great price we paid for starwars ( a total failure).
The Reagan administration's friendly policy towards Saddam Hussein During the Reagan years, the U.S. offered significant support to Iraq, including weapons components, military intelligence, and even some of the ingredients for manufacturing biological weapons like anthrax
DutchsMaria 1 year ago
@DutchsMaria What does that have to do with his fiscal policy? Can't deny it can you? Wanna talk about Clinton's reign and what he did wrong? I have a lot.
PipersGrip 1 year ago
@PipersGrip Hey I am a fiscal conservative!
What was so fiscally conservative about the starwars program? Or his Military spending. I was behind the iron curtain in 1974...communism was already breaking down its own society!!!!!!!!!
DutchsMaria 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul said "i was on a plane with Ronald Reagan and he told me that when a great country stops backing their currency with gold they cease to be a great country"
DutchsMaria 1 year ago
Reagan hated the deficit he created but he was forced to with the cold war and the economy
jbrack 2 years ago
@jbrack Regan would of never done half the things he did if he wasn't senile half of his presidency.
AmericanValues321 1 year ago
This is all bullshit, Reagan threw us further into dept, not to mention he made the military industrial complex bigger.
All this talk was to appeal to people, not what he believed in.
Many people think Reagan was our greatest president, ask them why and they'll tell you every media network is always praising him.
I still don't see why.
an50331 2 years ago
You can't even spell debt.
I still don't see why.
dmb1791 2 years ago
im sure you looked over your comment many times to make sure you got all your spelling right.
other than typos you seem to have no real argument. so i suggest you go elsewhere.
and btw dont bother responding because i know you will just ramble on and on like a child. have a good day.
an50331 2 years ago
it wasn't meant to be an argument. was just pointing it out. I'm having a great day.
dmb1791 2 years ago
You sir are correct Reagan changed he was responcable for the Japaneze flooding our auto market and destroying America's auto industry, Also when he took office after Jimmy Carter our National debt was one trillion when he left office it was at 4 trillion. The Ronald Reagan of the sixties was a differant man by the eighties. But I love these old video's.
jerryjamify 2 years ago 5
Sorry for the misspelled words guess you can blame the American school sytem and my parents. But what I said was correct and thats what matters.
jerryjamify 2 years ago
Debt not dept, go to school.
dopestories 2 years ago
Great catch, by the way I am in school getting my doctorate in political science.
Do they even have schools in that shit hole
you live in? I doubt they even have running water in thailand.
I am not going to read your mindless reply, so go to sleep instead.
an50331 2 years ago
through us into further debt? How do you think Mr. Clinton got rid of it so easily? Not by taxation of the rich, He cut the defense spending which Reagan and Bush would have cut some to get rid of the deficit but by no where near how much clinton did. (More than half the military budget/personnel was cut). Reagan decreased inflation, interest rates, lowered taxes which didnt decrease tax revenue. He also talked aout the military industrial complex. The cold war was ended by his policies.
MGSBigBoss1964 2 years ago
Increased government spending by the democratic house with high federal interest rates, (Reagan wanted to get rid of the uselss Dept. of Education and Dept. of Energy and many more government programs and useless spending that i can go into if needed but research will help the ignorant.), and Reagan had to up defense spending to break the Soviets.
MGSBigBoss1964 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@an50331 if you happen to live under your rock all of your life the Soviet Union was around during his presidency and democrats in congress were the ones that wouldn't let him cut spending and shrink govt. He did the best he could. Just look at today how hard it is for the dems and repubs to compromise on anything
agentmyles451 1 month ago
This guy had potential...to bad his belief in liberty didn't run deep enough. He was still too much of a statist.
atrickpay11 2 years ago
Some say Ronald Reagan was not as good as he sounded because the gov. grew and deficit went up when he was president.
Remember, the president has limited power under the Constitution. When Reagan ran for president half the Republicans in power didn't want him. when he became president, he had to work with a Democrat congress and an unfriendly press.
I think he did the best he could with what he had. If Ron Paul had become President he would have a hard time.
tomrdee 2 years ago 3
What,no love for the Telepromtper/Obama here?
niagra898 2 years ago
Obama is going to put us all that think like Reagan in FEMA camps so he can build a bigger corporate empire for the corporations and the bankers.
jerryjamify 2 years ago
am amazed that he pronounced "totalinarianism" properly...much have had a good acting coach...O...wait...i meant speech writer...wait, no, i meant acting coach...ummm...errrr....
erikatube808 2 years ago
Do you realize that Reagan wrote most of his speeches? especially those before he was President.
Aryaba 2 years ago 5
Reagan keeps looking down to read his speech. Those were not his words. Obviouly, he was reading the words of Ron Paul. President B. Hussein Obama speaks from his heart and never looks down. He is genuine and a true savior that is now trying to correct the wrongs of the racist past. Congress should outlaw the Republican Party and throw their leaders in prison for all the evil they have created in this world. Lets make the Democratic Party the only party of the USA. Imprison all who don't join.
boomchichiboom 2 years ago
if you're going to falsely present yourself as a democrat in order to make a silly statement like that, you need to be less obvious. lame joke.
jesse1018 2 years ago
No thanks i like my liberty. I do not want to live in Stalin's USSR.
Triforce007 2 years ago 3
Obama the "true savior"....hahahahahaha u fuckin idiot. let me guess you're a socialist that calls yourself a "liberal"
drunkenboxer1985 2 years ago
The last time that Reagan told the truth.
genYprogressive 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul should FINALLY tell his LOST party (what's left of it anyway) to SHOVE it (!) & go INDEPENDENT - to GROW the movement which DOES have BROAD support BUT would (eventually) have MUCH MORE without that TOXIC "R" tag. Not only that, but the VAST MAJORITY of Republicans will simply NEVER get it! They literally JUST CAN'T SEE into that (libertarian) window. They can't think "OUTSIDE the BOX".
FACE IT, they are by & large INCAPABLE of seeing BEYOND "Reagan" (CREDIT CARD) "conservatism".
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 3 years ago
People who loved Reagan LOVED him. People who hated him HATED him. But, there is no questioning that he LOVED this country, and was willing to do whatever was required of him to preserve the IDEA of a free and sovereign country.
There is a delicate "salt" of prophecy in this speech - the "somewhere to run to" example of the Cuban. Where do we go when this experiment falls?
BBCater 3 years ago 7
No no no, Ronald Reagan sounds like Ronald Reagan. I have respect for Ron Paul but he is no Gipper!
Brianmck16 3 years ago
Obviously America is going down.... way down.... sad.
LeeKwangEng 3 years ago
As far as social, domestic, and constitutional issues I think the two are VERY close to one another. Foreign policy is another story. Reagan knew that we were in the midst of a third World War, and it wasn't time to back down. If Ron Paul were in Reagan's position he would be more likely to practice detente than roll back.
Incognito1990 3 years ago
This the first time of heard a Reagan speech and agreed with him.
But in the end, it all comes down to the administration itself, not the ideology it espouces - like the present one
YuzBeK 3 years ago
Agreed.
vakeraj 3 years ago
WoW. What a great person he was.
Willadamus 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ron Paul is quack.
niagra898 3 years ago
Ronald Reagan Sounds Like Ron Paul?
Ron Paul Sounds Like Ronald Reagan!!!
Ron Paul For President
cbmodesto 3 years ago 34
Reagan wasn't a perfect man, but he was certainly better than G.W. Bush! This video tells me that a chance to improve things was thrown away in 1964 and that very few people learned from history.
Now it looks like another chance is being thrown away in 2008 with the "promotion" of John McCain. He's part of the problem called big government that inevitably bankrupts any country that doesn't put a stop to it.
archelonprime 3 years ago 4
God i miss this man...
srie2 3 years ago 7
Holy shit! Reagan blew down the house there!
People in the audience must have being getting chills through there bodies.
atrickpay11 3 years ago 6
This is the same guy that started the War on Drugs? What the Hell?
KissMeImPunk 3 years ago
I think it was Nixon that started the 'war on drugs'.... Ha, big surprise
Snowriderpdx 3 years ago
I believe it was Democratic House Speaker Tip O'Neil that escalated the War on Drugs in 1986.
vakeraj 3 years ago
It was congress in general. A stupid idea
Beadbud5000 3 years ago
The Reagan brand of credit card conservatism is destined for the ash heap of history.
Governing by MASSIVE deficit spending (Reagan/Bush/Bush) is NOT leadership.
Write in Ron Paul.
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 3 years ago
I remember this movie!
What an actor..
crock703 3 years ago
Reagan was the end of an era. Bush Sr. was the beginningof our downfall.
SATANISMOX 3 years ago 7
I like Reagan in many aspects
I admire T. Jefferson
I LOVE RON PAUL
LibertarianEurope 3 years ago 28
@LibertarianEurope its kinda like that with me, but more like this.
I like Reagan
I admire Ron Paul
I love Thomas Jefferson
but both Reagan, and Paul are kinda like Jefferson in many ways.
connorqb17 1 year ago
@connorqb17 Wasnt Reagan involved alot in the deregulation of banks?
Trox118 10 months ago
The amount of wealth produced during this seven year period was stupendous - some $30 trillion worth of goods and services. Again, it was a world record. Never before had so much wealth been produced during a comparable period. According to a recent study, net asset values - including stocks,
bonds and real estate - went up by more than $5 trillion between 1982 and 1989, an increase of roughly 50 percent.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago 2
Never before had so many jobs been created during a comparable time period. The new jobs covered the entire spectrum of work, and more than half of them paid more than $20,000 a year. As total employment grew to 119.5 million, the rate of unemployment fell to slightly over 5 percent, the lowest level in 15 years. Creation of wealth.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
The two key measures that mark a depression or expansion are jobs and production. Let's look at the records that were set. Creation of jobs. From November 1982, when President Ronald Reagan's new economic program was beginning to take effect, to November 1989, 18.7 million new jobs were created. It was a world record:
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
Ronald Reagan knew that Ron Paul was a special man. Reagan's Charisma, and Ron Paul's understanding of the government would make the greatest politician ever to walk this planet we call earth.
amazingnick 3 years ago 6
We don't know whether historians will call it the Great Expansion of the 1980's or Reagan's Great Expansion, but we do know from official economic statistics that the seven year period from 1982 to 1989 was the greatest, consistent burst of economic activity ever seen in the U.S. In fact, it was the greatest economic expansion the world has ever seen - in any country, at any time.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago 4
H t t p colon slash slash query dot nytimes dot com / gst / fullpage dot h tml ? res = 9C0CE1DC153BF934A25752C0A966958260 (the new york times here people) The Reagan Boom -- "Greatest Ever" MARTIN ANDERSON, A SENIOR FELLOW OF THE HOOVER INSTITUTION, AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY Published: January 17, 1990 (over 2 years after Reagan's term)
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
Looks like Reagan lied about what he was gonna do.
FistsoFuckinFreedom 3 years ago
Great clip, thank you. Keep up the good fight.
freedommv1 3 years ago 3
Reagan Lead from the heart, the mind and the passion a true child of god should how lives life on a principles higher then their own
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
Yes Clintons was worse because while Reagan lied for our survival from foreign invaders Clintons was only about self-serving gratification. Period. I don't think anyone's liberty benefited from Clintons giving her a money shot.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
what a crock of sh...
acaval3 3 years ago
I love how Clinton supporters like to trivialize Clintons blow job and follow up weeks of lying directly in the faces of the American media, having the gall to point his finger in our faces and while red in the face from shouting it was all party politics that everyone else was lying. It took knowing that his seed drenched the blue dress for him to finally find God as it were and cum clean. To bad the many other deaths he was responsible for could not have been as easily proved
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
The modern day Republican Party sets the bar WAY too low with all this Reagan worship.
Ron Paul, with his libertarian principles, would be a much better president than Reagan ever was.
No more credit card "conservatives"!
Flag waving and massive deficit spending - Enough already!
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 3 years ago
This fundamental conflict between the First and Fourteenth Amendments, coupled with the boundless capacity of the Internet, calls for an exploration of solutions that re-evaluate the expansive protection of hate speech in existing constitutional precedent. Until a more proper balance is established between the private interest in free expression and the interest of the state in preventing hate crimes, the current protections given to hate speech will continue to be subject to debate.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
While the First Amendment guarantees a freedom of speech, no right is absolute if it infringes on other rights guaranteed under the Constitution. It has been suggested that hate speech is inconsistent with the principle of equality established by the Fourteenth Amendment. If the Fourteenth Amendment is to embody an antidiscrimination principle, then anything that supports and further perpetuates racial inequality should be regulated.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
In Reno v. ACLU, the Court held that "the interest in encouraging freedom of expression in a democratic society outweighs any theoretical but unproven benefit of censorship. This approach has its detractors, however; former Vice President Al Gore, among others, has contended that the existing judicial and regulatory structures are no longer appropriate in the context of the hate speech issue.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
Furthermore, the Internet has served as an important recruitment tool for these individuals and groups.
The dangers regarding hate speech through the use of the Internet are evident. There is a fine line between the exchange of values and ideas and the perpetuation of hate in the form of degradation and violence. Despite this fine distinction, the Supreme Court has continued to protect online hate speech based on rights guaranteed under the First Amendment.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
With the increasingly widespread use of the Internet, however, individuals and hate groups are able to promote hateful conduct and speech inexpensively and easily while simultaneously reinforcing each other's hateful convictions. The Internet also allows for the opportunity not only to post messages, but also to engage in conversation through chat rooms.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
The features that make the Internet so unique have increasingly been manipulated to benefit the needs of those who spread hate-filled propaganda. Persons who display various kinds of hate are able to relay these feelings to others on newsgroups. Prior to the Internet, hate groups spread their propaganda through written materials, in a concerted effort to connect with others who shared the same beliefs.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
The Internet has been and will continue to be a medium that allows individuals to interact, research, and conduct business with ease and speed. The vast majority of Americans do not need regulations to provide standards of appropriate or inappropriate behavior in cyberspace. There remains a small percentage of individuals, however, who need some type of regulation to prevent them from infringing upon other rights that individuals hold so dear.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
hate speech is constitutional. don't get ridiculous.
ERS86 3 years ago
No it really is not
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
It will then examine how this structure limits the government's ability to regulate hate speech on the Internet. This section will also explore other legal means that are being used to regulate hate speech. Finally, it will conclude by taking a look at alternative techniques that are being used to protect individuals from hate speech. Examining the Problem: The Need for Additional Regulation of Hateful Cyberspeech
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
Secondly, hate-filled speech may go beyond simply altering an individual's thoughts and may in fact lead to crimes of death and destruction arising from the exposure to such ideas. This Comment will attempt to illustrate the need for increased regulation of hate speech on the Internet by examining three facets of this debate. It will first examine existing First Amendment precedent dealing with freedom of expression issues generally.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
The danger of free speech in cyberspace crossing over to become language that perpetuates hatred and provokes violence is a very real threat. This threat manifests itself in two primary forms. First, young Internet users who may be easily influenced are exposed to hate-filled ideals and values, often without any regulation or guidance.
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago
I urge everyone seeing someone posting hate speech to Google department of homeland security and list who stated the hate speech along with which video it was posted. There is an anti-american boiler room operation which can been seen if you researched enough of the Reagan posting pages. Free speech is protected, hate speech is a crime that needs to be reported.
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago
Funny... Wrong Paul has only 4 delegates. Romney and Giulianni were true conservatives. Same polocies as Regan. Lower taxes, offense on enemies, better security, better boarder security. Look at the other's speeches, very few differences from both Paul and the other republicans compared to Regan... Pual wants to leave Iraq which IS NOT CONSERVAYTIVE. why is he losing? Because real conservatives see through him.
AJTech47 4 years ago
As the national security of the United States has become increasingly important in recent months, the debate regarding the censorship of hate speech has again arisen. While many individuals remain wary of infringing upon First Amendment rights through the regulation of hate speech in cyberspace, some suggest that the expansive and pervasive nature of the Internet calls for such regulation.
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago
Americans have been forced to question whether hate-filled online rhetoric is simply the harmless exercise of free speech or is a preventable catalyst of illegal conduct. The death and destruction caused by terrorists who listened to and adopted anti-American views are reminders that speech can often spur dangerous actions in response.
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago
What would REAGAN do?
Lower taxes
Spend us into oblivion
What would RON PAUL do?
Abolish the income tax
Stop massive deficit spending
NO MORE CREDIT CARD PRESIDENTS!
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 4 years ago 3
If lowering taxes doesn't work, than why did we get an economic surplus when Regan was president? You need to learn history stupid. Besides, we're not in a resestion.
AJTech47 4 years ago
Low taxes are great! But the problem WAS (and is) SPENDING. There were NO surpluses during the 80's - lol. Much like the current administration, there was only massive deficit spending year after year. And the "liberal" congress even spent LESS than "conservative" Reagan asked for! The 80's is when the deficits started to get completely out of control.
Anybody can live like a king if they just max out all of their credit cards. Very unethical to leave the bill for the NEXT guy to pay off.
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 4 years ago 2
yes there was. There was also a stronger military. It's goood for our deffense from enemies. Besides... My entire family loved those times.
AJTech47 4 years ago
The federal deficits did not begin to shrink until 1993 (Bill Clinton's first year) - resulting in first surplus in many DECADES in 1998. The surpluses continued . . . 1999, 2000, 2001 - until George W. Bush took office.
I loved a lot of things in the 80's too! What does that have to do with anything? lol
Information on federal deficits (surpluses) is not that hard to find. Try Google (or a new school)!
No more credit card presidents!
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 4 years ago
all the conservatives are out of the race. Paul is never going to win.. Huckabee won't win. McCain, not conservative, is going to win...:(
AJTech47 4 years ago
Along with this tremendous opportunity, however, comes the threat of abuse. With the increase in the number of people online, a significant percentage of the country's population is exposed to an increasing number of expressions of bigotry and hate that are readily available on the Internet. Following the tragic events which occurred in the United States on September 11, 2001, the threat of violence due to hate-based ideas and values has become a pressing reality.
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago
Close. It's actually: Ron Paul Sounds Like Ronald Reagan.
Hopefully Romney will appoint Ron Paul Sec. of the Treasury.
zrepman 4 years ago
In 1976 Ron Paul was one of only four republican to endorse Ronald Reagan for president. In 1978 Ronald Reagan campaigned for Ron Paul.
We need another Reagan, vote Ron Paul!
tvan42 4 years ago
Same values and belief of constitution.
Shaunt1 4 years ago 2
Today's Ron = Yesterday's Ron :)
prp65 4 years ago
Sounds like Ron? You betcha.
chewbaca1989 4 years ago
No doubts about who the Gipper would be supporting in this election. Ron Paul.
insidejobb 4 years ago
Honors for This Video:
#42 - Top Favorites (All Time) - News & Politics - Australia
#33 - Top Rated (All Time) - News & Politics - Australia
ArmoredPanther 4 years ago
The parallels between Ron and Ron are so pervasive. From being outcast by his own party, to the urgency of the message.
DCUPtoejuice 4 years ago 5
With respect to "the Gipper", who also had some very "libertarian" views, Ron Paul would be MUCH stronger in regard to spending and fiscal discipline. Reagan always asked for more $ than even the "liberal" congress actually spent. That would NOT happen with President Ron Paul. Sure, it would be nice if RP had some of Reagan's communication skills, but when you add it all up, Ron Paul's message is much stronger than Reagan's.
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 4 years ago 7
Where can I get a transcript of this?
motiongraphics81 4 years ago
Type everything you hear.
kywhitne 4 years ago
LOL!
MeatyCockandBallz 4 years ago
That is hilarious. "Type everything you hear". Brilliant.
BBCater 3 years ago
The sad truth is that his own party didn't even recognize his value until after the fact. They constantly worked against him. It looks like they are up to the same tactics with Ron Paul. We cannot wait for Washington to recognize a good leader. It is up to us. "Down with them all except for Ron Paul!"
zeroxpectations 4 years ago
I never knew that Fulbright was a fascist. Thanks for posting this.
-jcr
NSResponder 4 years ago
Reagan was so damn right! Govt doesn't give freedom as it can only take it away!
ArmoredPanther 4 years ago 2
Please donate on Jan 21, Martin Luther King day, this month's money bomb. Sign up at FreeAtLast2008. com. Donate at RonPaul2008. com. Huckabee & McCain must drop out soon, they're out of cash, we keep beating Rudy and got 2nd in Nevada but have a lot of work ahead of us as the media ignores us but with wars, inflation and loss of liberty we need Dr. Paul badly, so spread the word, show support with a bumbersticker yard sign and t-shirt, vote in the primaries and get involved with a local meetup.
GBanville 4 years ago
Yes, Ron and Ronald are exactly the same on all of the issues. I guess we now know who the real republican is today. And the others claim to be like Ronald Reagan. Hah! They (Romney, Huckabee, Thompson, McCain and Gulliani) must be joking if they think they are true republicans and can hold a candle to Ron Paul.
jayrod59 4 years ago
WOW talk about edited he supported the action against communism :)
KrGsMrNKusinagi0 4 years ago
Ron Paul is the only true Republican in this race. The rest are RINO -- but unfortunately, as primary results are showing, so are the party members. I'm still with the GOP, but I'm getting pretty sick of it.
thx01138 4 years ago 4
Everyone please add this video as a favorite, rate it and post a similar comment to this one so this video will be higher-profile!
themissoulian 4 years ago 4
Our dollar is now worth about $0.04, back then it was worth $0.45. And we don't have any gold in the treasury anymore.
soulmantim 4 years ago 2
Comment removed
zeotide 4 years ago
And did you notice when Reagan died the press made sure they only played excerpts from within the first minute of this speech, they dared not share any other part, similar to Fox News editing out Ron Paul's answer to their smear "electibility" question in the January 10th debate when they rebroadcasted.
AwakeAndAriseOrg 4 years ago
Very nice speech.
Manicci 4 years ago 4
want the Reagan of 1964 as President 2008?
Vote Ron Paul!
colbyco101 4 years ago 12
Ronald Reagan of 1964 for President 2008!
evan2024 4 years ago 4
how about ron paul?
kneelio321 4 years ago
excellent
yboldt14 4 years ago 3
as much as Reagan wants to believe he is a small government, fiscal conservative, he really did wonders to advance the big government neocon movement.
watercreature 4 years ago 3
Was this speech made yesterday?
rainmancdw5 4 years ago 17
more people need to see this video...
wow things have gotten worse...
homersparents 4 years ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
are you kidding me !!!! Reagan is a devil and he recieved cocaine from Nicaragua,shipped to the cia to crack created by the cia and placed in los angeles in 1983.He was the most evil deceptive man known to man!!!and this is no conspiracy check out reagan and crack!!!
ABSOLUTETRUTH777 4 years ago
I don't think it was Reagan, it was more of his VP's influence...ex-CIA director George H.W. Bush
soulmantim 4 years ago 2
I love the quote "I had a place to escape to". If you have an Obama/Huckabee ticket. Where am I as a European going to escape?
USA is becoming the USSA (united socialist state of America).
ShameonIowa 4 years ago 15
Amen
motoxdog1 4 years ago 5
Compare the current Republicans (GWB, Cheney, Rove, etc.) to Ronald Reagan. What a frightening contrast!
Ron Paul is the first Republican in YEARS that I'm truly FOR rather than "I'm against his opponents."
archelonprime 4 years ago 14
It's good time to have another Ron in the White House.
tbed63 4 years ago 10
frannyward 4 years ago
Reagan and Paul have were friends and I think Reagan did what he could for a just America..
Sebass512 4 years ago 2
I remember the Iran/ Contra Senate hearings; And at the time I believed Ronny Ray-gun when he said that he was "out of the loop" but his V.P. daddy Bush wasn't; and either were most of the carry overs ( Cheney, Rumsfeld,Poindexter,etc.) from 41's administration.
He wasan actor, and he was playing "the President" for these Neo-cons.
z8it 4 years ago
RON PAUL!
Bring America back. I didn't agree with lots of what Ronald Regan (Iran Contra) did but his message here is perfect.
Rustyshackleford08 4 years ago 7
Reagan mentions Barry Golwater. Goldwater officially supports Ron Paul for 2008. Look it up.
littledmac 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Barry Goldwater is dead. His real movement is not. Ron Paul is a phony.
VendettaStang 4 years ago
youtubedotcom/watch?v=W7r27Az_Mns
littledmac 4 years ago 2
Please explain why Ron Paul is a phony?
shovet1111 4 years ago
Hmm. A consistent record over 10 terms in congress. Ron a phony?
I'm glad they allow you internet access in the mental ward you're in. It provides entertainment for us.
alnewberry 4 years ago
Sorry, I meant Barry Goldwater jr.
youtubedotcom/watch?v=W7r27Az_Mns
littledmac 4 years ago 2
Goldwater jr does, his dad is dead.
Hopefully, his movement isn't.
soulmantim 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Paul is like a more sinister Reagan.
o0xst 4 years ago
Only if you want a bigger government and wasteful spending :)
soulmantim 4 years ago
yah thats what i want it is a fine treat emoticon
o0xst 4 years ago
Reagan and Paul are very different. Reagan was a warmonger who did nothing to stop the growth of government.
w738 4 years ago 5
Reagan and Paul were very similar before Reagan became president. After he was elected, Reagan was shot and his tune changed... immensely.
SJSR45 4 years ago 2
Correct. And he was a dummy. A man of no particular intelligence. A low level Hollywood actor, the head of the actor's union that ratted on his membership for the FBI...
Ron Paul is a doctor, an economist, he's a well read guy, quite smart.
Go Ron Go.
Cadmium77 4 years ago
You moron jerk. Reagan was brilliant, read his papers. He was best president of 20th century. Listen to his brilliancde here.
robertlaf 4 years ago 2
Do you really thing Ronnie wrote his own speeches? lol...he read the teleprompter...the ones that had script on them composed by the GE brain trust that he sold himself to after he became persona non grata in Hollywood.
Cadmium77 4 years ago