BBC editors: WANKERS

[Kaldhore]

To say that its evil is nothing more than mental health bias, anyone can get smurf evidence together to incriminate anyone. This is crap - have some inteligence to see thru it.

[Kaldhore]

Look, as far as i see (and i look at all new agencies on the web) the bbc is by FAR the fairest and most unbiased. Do they get it wrong now and then YES, but alot LESS than most others out there. Its a publickly paid for organisation which means theyre alot more answerable than the likes of FOX

[TheElfdreaming]

and after having finished watching the rest of your video, I would say commercial media is far, far, far more biased, including ones you quote. Commercial media is much more 'evil'.

[TheElfdreaming]

The BBC, like the ABC, swings between centrist to left leaning, which is only fair considering the rest of the media is strongly right wing, it provides a little balance. It is also far more intellegent than the rest of the media

[afewtube]

Wherever you are in the world, whichever country you live in, whatever your nationality, don't believe the BBC!

[BBCRacismWatch]

@afewtube i hope you will appreciate my additional points about the BBC lies...

[DieMoslim]

...and criminal muslimmies are consistently presented as Asians ! ! ! Poor sods, what did the peaceful buddists ever do to deserve that kind of affiliation?

Pull the plug on the BBCs fat lies. Those financing the BBC via license fees are themselves oppressors of truth and common decency. Shame on the Brits.

[cmarshy44]

To try to argue the point of bias in the media by posting a video called BBC editors: WANKERS may perhaps be a fairly large case of the pot calling the kettle black. The bbc is not perfect it, but it does a far better job of seeking out facts and remaining unbias than you or the murdoch empire your whole show quotes.

[cmarshy44]

Take exhibit C anti-christianity the bbc represents a majority agnostic/athiest society which however it does spend time in my view disproportionate on religion including christianity i.e. songs of praise and the numerous apperances of christian leaders on the news

[herbertwarmstrong]

@cmarshy44 Are you for real? Even most Christian groups have recognised the BBC is biased against Christianity? In apartheid South Africa, where I lived for 14 years, there was much more Christianity on the television! We had Bible readings on the Television every day!

[pigsbishop99]

Just look at the vast salaries the BBC pays it's staff. That's pure hypocrasy.

[Danni4815162342]

BBCs full of leftwingnuts some of whom used to be communists back in the day, and thats a well known fact in media circles.

Look all you have to do is scrap the licence fee, make Beeb take on advertising. Then bring in law to limit TV advertising to a acceptable levels, less than sky etc have now.

[tsarenvy]

anti israel?

lol, behave

[SGTMattyW]

And how you can make that casual link between the BBC and the London bombings is an absolute fucking disgrace.

[SGTMattyW]

Before I start I'd like to point out that I am a white middle class male who is ever so slightly right wing, so spamming extremist comments about me is pointless.

Whilst the BBC is clearly left wing, I don't think it's an "ANTI-BRITISH, PRO-MUSLIM, BIASED ORGANISATION".

Your way of getting your point cross by just compiling useless evidence and then forcing it on others is a disgrace, so any proof you have that might be true is just ignored because you, sir, are an idiot.

[FUCKTHEBEEB]

SGTMattyW: The BBC gives double the amount of coverage to pro-EU speakers as it does to euro-sceptics despite the majority of British people now wanting out of the EU. Therefore it's anti_British.

The BBC would throw a bible into a bin during a comedy show but not the koran. It's director general Mark Thompson admitted it treats islam differently to other religions for fear of offending it. Therefore it's pro-muslim.

I therefore duly put it to you that it is infact YOU who is the idiot.

[lndac02]

Nothing you can do, and they know it. you either pay for their service or go to jail. wouldnt you like your customers in that predicament? they can offer whatever view they choose, and be as biased as they like, at the end of the day you still have to write them a cheque.The BBC is truly a example of a organisation biting the hand that feeds it (the UK population)

[DumblyBrilliant]

Actually, you DO NOT have to pay for their licence at all. You think you do because they told you that you do. In fact, it is bullshit.

[lndac02]

hello Dumbly, Seriously please explain how I can watch ITV without paying the BBC? I find it enraging that in this day and age a organisation can force its service upon me. On top of this they can at the least threatnen you with court action for not paying for their service even if you don't watch it. I am pretty much tired of being "educated" with their beliefs. I want to be entetained & informed, not given the opinions of left leaning whites with a agenda to placate given to me as facts

[KarmicAnarchist]

I'm with Dumbly Brilliant on this one, you do not have to pay for a Licence at all. I have been at my present address, for thirteen years, have always watched and owned a TV set, and have never once in my life paid for a Licence. About once every month, I get a threatening letter, informing me that there is no registered

licence at my address. This goes on every month, or so,and has done since I moved in. The letters threaten various penaltys, from court action, to home visits.

[KarmicAnarchist]

All these letters are given the same treatment. Straight into the bin. But still they come. Four or five times, They have knocked on the door, and asked why I have no licenece. Now listen carefully, here is the nub of the issue. I lie, and tell them I don't have a licence, because I don't have a TV. They write this down, in their notebook, then ask if they can come in, just to check. To which, I reply, "No you cannot." They then ask "Why can't I come in to check you have no TV?"

[KarmicAnarchist]

I then say,"I've given you the information you asked for, why did you even write it down, if you don't believe me?" He says, I just need to quickly check, for the records" I say, "Tough, I've complied with your questions, you have no right of entry, or reasonable suspicion that am watching TV, so we're done here" Even then they sometimes threaten to come back with a "Hand held detector" whatever that is, and I say, "Fine, you do that then, you still wont be coming in, now Fuck off"

[KarmicAnarchist]

If you take this line with them, there is nothing theyy can do. The Police wont get involved, unless there is a report of criminal activity. Which there wont be. You don't have to open your door to them even, Just ignore them and they will go away. Fuck paying them a penny. If you really believe the stuff you are saying about the BBC, and had the courage of your convictions, you wouldn't let them Bully you into paying a penny.

[lndac02]

I admire you for your position and balls.I would love to tell the BBC to fuck off.I have kids and a job I would certainly lose if I got a conviction.I would happily give the same amount of money to charity each year and never watch the BBC again.I dispise their political views & hate having myself and my kids educated into "correct thinking" night in and night out.its got to the point where i watch about a hours TV a week because I am sick of the crap shows and indoctrinating.BBC by subscription

[AndrewJP138]

Its true that the BBC is not unbiased, I think it must be impossible for any news-reporting organisation to adopt a fully objective stand-point. Can I ask the creator of this video where they have taken most of the newspaper criticisms from though? The font seen suggests that most of them have been taken from more reactionary right wing newspapers such as the Mail and Sun. How can you properly criticise the BBC when all of your evidence is from biased sources?

[hartley10]

wahey mon the bbc! giruy!

[angryyounghippo]

i agree. Im not anti-gay, but the BBC is not an unbiased organisation. Most people tolerate it, they do not openly promote homosexuality. Agree that it is anti-Israel and anti-American. It is also anti-white heterosexual anglo-saxon male and anti-christian and pro-Islamic terrorist. Reports of muslims spitting on British soldiers on returning from tours of duty were referred to as "other sources". The BBC is an anti-free speech, left wing faschist organisation.

[AndrewJP138]

Can I point out the oxymoron and spelling mistake you've used there? How can the BBC be both left wing and fascist at the same time?

[APOTH101]

Umm he might mean the following:

Left-Wing - Political correctness (e.g. bending over backwards to not offend muslims in any way possible at the expense of other faiths' freedoms)

LINKED TO

Fascism - Might not be the right word, but he means 'positive discrimination'. That means discriminating the ethnic majority (white people) in favour of the minorities (supposedly muslims).

The gloomy truth - It hurts.

Hope that explanation helps a bit by the way.

[tonjg]

the bbc has long been recognised as a cesspool of homosexuals and vanity. It has an aggressive left wing agenda and bbc staff are obsessed with getting the faces of asians and africans on the screen at every opportunity. They make me sick.

[vasiliosrigos]

i suggest everyone get there information from the Bible. It is the truth. Anyone tells you sometying or preaches something to you ,make sure you verify it in the Bible

a servant of my Lord Jesus Christ

[ironmanalasdair]

Fuck you, the last thing anyone looking for answers needs in their lives is a book of mad scribblings to fuck with their head.

[cisco9x]

If its OK for that ba$tard Bush to KILL Iraqis from 1990 to 2008, then don't you think its a bit rich to criticize Russia for protecting its own people in South Ossetia ?

[magicdosh]

Hmm, giving the taliban airtime is one thing, what about when the US armed them to fight the Russians?

[philproductions2210]

an organisation that supports the EU project despite evidence to suggest how bad the EU has become, must be evil. Thus , the BBC are evil. Their flagrant bias in other areas (pro- immigration, multiculturism, and anti-america, israel, christianity - the list goes on) is also proof that their news and current affairs editorial stance must be silenced.

[magicdosh]

OMG you mean...their...their...liberal­? Shock horror!

[chrisalmond]

I totally feel you man. my local newspaper is totally biased against slavery and child rape. without exception it treats those topics as if they are bad, never showing the positive sides of those issues. I mean, OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE! how can we trust a newspaper that won't fairly report the benefits of raping children and owning slaves?

[itslefty2004]

Sometime ago,I tried to have my say on the BBC website, David Blunkett the Mad Politician had been caught with his fingers in the passport tellers office, He was arranging a quick British passport for a friend of a friend, anyway I had my say on the BBC website, I suggested that Blunkett should be suspended on full pay until such time as the investigations were concluded, What could be fairer than that? "My say", was never seen on the BBC website, because the BBC are wankers, evil wankers.

[FatherWarhol]

Many people have experienced this from the BBC. Check out the Biased BBC blog for a daily dose of BBC bias exposed.

[AtaxiaNox]

I agree with every word in the video.

The BBC is State Television of the sort we used to laugh at when it came out of the USSR China and North Korea.

They are dedicated to propagandising the UK, whitewashing Islam (a supremacist death cult - no, I'm not exaggerating - read the Sirat Rasul Allah, Koran and Hadith), spitting on the Enlightenment and promoting minority 'rights' over the majority.

The BBC are poison AND MUST BE REMOVED.

[magicdosh]

Wow! And to think I've been paying my TV license for this! C'mon, wake up, the BBC is the most respected media worldwide. The fact that it doesn't have to please advertisers is why many of the programs are syndicated worldwide.

[scott8anthony8]

'Partial'; as you produce a video with half the headline being displayed, and taking the meaning out of context!!

[placeborick]

all media follows the same rules. dont watch tv or read newspapers its all garbage il make my own descisions in this world thanks

[chrisbhackett]

It`s amazing i used to think that the bbc were last great thing about this country.

Long,long time since felt that.

[qarnain06]

BBC has been biased for years against all monotheist religions and heavily promotes evolutionary pseudo science just watch David Attomborough. Sounds more like a Marxist organization. New World Order perhaps

[ruddigore28]

The BBC is biased, no matter what it's defenders claim. It pushes forward an inherent liberal, left-wing view that even senior journalists have admitted to. Now whether you agree with its views or not is irrelevant. What matters is that this is an organisation funded by everyone in the UK, and it should NOT be pushing any view, be it the above or otherwise.

[exiteu]

I agree in most part with what you say, I was with you few months ago. but I believe you are not seeing the whole picture. All groups are being misrepresented. Political correctness is Marxism (Frankfurt School)intended to break down our society, Muslims and Jews are being setup for a backlash.

[FatherWarhol]

I have detailed files on KGB infiltration of Western academia. I'm with you on this. But Common Purpose is a THINK TANK of cultural Marxism which precludes setting up Muslims for persecution; the muslims are fucking up their own reputation anyhows.

[exiteu]

Please google Brian Gerrish Common Purpose.

There is a video which is long but very informative. I assure you they are a lot more than active than a "think tank", all will become clear.

[FatherWarhol]

Yes I've watched it. I have studied Common Purpose, it's a think tank, their ideology is "Diversity" i.e. cultural marxism. Now I asked Brian Gerrish about his dialogue with muslim imans and he told me that the muslim imans believe Common Purpose is a Jewish Zionist front. They're wrong of course, Cultural Marxism is a lot of things but they wont be scapegoating muslims ('the new jews') anytime soon.

[FatherWarhol]

The investigation into the makers of the Dispatches documentary on mosques that promote homophobia etc is more representative of how the common purpose brain washed people behave. They persecute those who threaten 'diversity', not those who are 'diverse'.

[exiteu]

Well done for watching it, you appear to have got something different from me, first of all they are using Marxist techniques but their aim not strictly Marxism but ending our democracy, and you appear to have ignored the EU links.

take a look at the Antiterrorist on youtube

[FatherWarhol]

They're totally committed to Cultural Marxism. The EU is implicit in this regard. The EU decision making bureaucracy is enriched with Frankfurt school theory, infact they quote Theodor Adorno and Erich Fromm in their internal communiques.. They don't want to abolish markets, they're better for raising taxes.. They are however committed to abolishing "inequality". They are also conciously anti-christian and ban criticism of Charles Darwin.

[exiteu]

I think that what is at work is a malevalent coalision. We are scarily close now to an EU police state, if Parliament approves the final treaty we lose habious corpous, trial by jury, control of our Army, Nuclear Weapons, our oil, Police, and this is only months away. The BBC is complicit in hiding this.

[BootTheEU]

I agree with you 100% and add this.

[BootTheEU]

Political correctness is cultural marxism. The BBC is a politically correct marxist organisation and is riddled with common purpose graduates (the EUs 5th column)Political correctness was invented at the frankfurt school to undermine western democracy and the BBC are assisting in this.

[exiteu]

The BBC is heavily infiltrated by "Common Purpose", please look them up and their agenda. They are also censoring "Ron Paul", you can look him up on Youtube. Then ask yourself why they want to suppress him in the UK.

[salaciousone]

Interesting but nothing i didnt know already. When i was young i used to be proud of the BBC. It made me proud to be British. Now its simply an embarresment. It makes me cringe.

I feel good not paying the license fee for their biased rubbish. 3.5 billion per year just for some good nature documentaries? I can do without it.

[evievans]

I bet that there isn't a channel or even one show in the world that is "non-bias"(to however a scrict degree you want to take it)

and impossible to make a channel or show that isn't felt to be bias by everyone

Some shit is more interesting than other shit.

Make a some with "pro-christian joke", what does that even mean..... they had Bally kiss Angel and the Vicar of Dibly.(which aren't pro-christians they just involve christian)

[FatherWarhol]

So you think apology for mass-murder is just a case mere bias endemic to the whole industry? The BBC is funded with a tax levied on pain of imprisonment, there's the difference.

[evievans]

I have never heard of any instance where they made of apology for terrorism....

what exactly did they say which was to this effect?

Is it the shows and news that they report that show boths sides of terrorism, why people are driven to it?(through revenge, grief) etc. Also how such awful tragedies effect the victims and their familys

if people aren't informed of why these people are infact bombing us there they won't know what we can do to make it stop

[FatherWarhol]

You are a perfect example of the BBC fed man. I'm lost for words. Watch the video at 1:34, 1:41, 1:48, it's all there. People are not "driven" to terrorism, Mohammed Sidique Khan did not suffer the daily privations of military occupation, he was making war according to the non-negotiable tenets of Islam, the BBC implore us to "understand" this, and hence no longer see it as a threat.

[evievans]

Wait i thought you were saying the bbc is bias... suposed given of extremist views a platform demonstraights un-biasness.

Although i'm guessing you feel any of these views being represented on TV is too much

Although to be fair i am intrigued by these extremists, yet the more i see of them the more contempt.

Although alternatively you can say that somepeople becaus of that tv footage might go on to be a terrorist because they would never have heard that arguement before

[FatherWarhol]

That's an interesting semantic point. Among other things BBC is partisan towards Islam, and scornful towards Christianity (Jerry Springer etc), whatever you think of religion, that's bias. It's supposed to be a neutral pubicly funded organisation, but they would never give a platform Nick Griffin, whatever you think of him, but they did allow Salma Yaqoob of RESPECT a platform. She has called an Islamic Republic of Great Britain etc.

[bezdevil]

what music you using here chris?

[FatherWarhol]

My own stuff.

[FatherWarhol]

Normalising Terrorism: It's what the BBC and the left do.

[chrisbhackett]

"The BBC is not impartial or neutral. It's a publicly funded, urban organisation with an abnormally large number of young people, ethnic minorities and gay people. It has a liberal bias not so much a party-political bias. It is better expressed as a cultural liberal bias", Andrew Marr, the Daily Mail, Oct 21st, 2006.

I`m none of the above ,can i have my money back?

[FatherWarhol]

BBC online has got to be one of the most evil organisations on the internet.

[johnpaulwinters]

I tried to post comments on the BBC website, but after answering their survey (said I was conservative from USA), their website actually said it didn't need my opinions!

I laughed so hard (at them). What a bunch of rubes!

[johnpaulwinters]

I subscribed to the BBC History magazine once, but I cancelled it quickly after reading a few articles.

I wrote them to complain about an article in which the author said President Bush was exactly the same as Robespierre (one of the madmen behind the mass murders during the French Revoluion). The BBC replied that the article had been well received, and they had no idea what I was talking about.

BLIND!

[toptop90]

you can easily spot a bbc journalist stalking your town.poncy,posh,muslim or white gay or feminist bitch.basically:a wanker.

[jeffjohnrog]

The BBC raises money by fear and intimidation? Where do you get this shit? Its publicly funded. You want to talk fear and intimidation, lets talk Fox News. This is so frustratingly stupid it hurts my brain.

[FatherWarhol]

"Its publicly funded."

That's exactly what I mean pudding cup. If I don't pay the licence tax to this anti-semitic hate organisation called the BBC I go to prison. Socialism implies a loss of personal liberty.

[faserkid]

Rubbish, you wont go to prison. Just get rid of your tv. It's not compulsory to watch it you know.

[jeffjohnrog]

one-sided, holier than though, arrogant, uneducated, selfish and completely ignorant of global FACTS. Pretty much sums up this video. For this world to function properly, EVERYONE needs to pull their heads out of their ass and start paying attention to IMPORTANT issues. This bickering is a joke. Way to add fuel to a fire for which you've not even the understanding for its burning. idiot.

[jeffjohnrog]

lol they are evil because they make attempts at both sides of the story being told. how dare they portray Islam in a positive light! lol crawl back under a rock you hate mongering moron.

[pinkmelon1]

...some very valid points there

[FatherWarhol]

When an Imam says that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism, what he means is "I won't oppose terrorism in my back garden". Think about that. Really think about it.

[Markandrich]

I'm a Christian and I was not offended by it. Jerry Springer The Opera was an award-winning stage play and a recognised piece of modern art. Those cartoons were not. The only bias is in favour of quality here.

[randomxnp]

Sorry, you arfe completely misunderstanding the cartoons. They were a major news story, and that is why they should have been shown (along with the fake ones used by a Danish Imam to stir up hatred), not because of artistic merit. The reason they were not shown was not lack of quality (you are simply lying there) but due to the risk of offence. The BBC said as much, yet do not mind offending non-muslims in many ways.

[Markandrich]

So you believe they were decent? And surely News and Arts have two seperate agendas? Diana's death was a major news story yet the TV and shows didn't show certain scenes of her death (even the Channel 4 thing didn't) despite them being available.

Arts however has a totally different agenda, and the risk of causing offence is part of that.

Also: the cartoons were rubbish and Jerry Springer: The Opera, indeed all the Kombat Opera shows, were fantastic.

[randomxnp]

Yes, the original cartoons were decent. They weren't very good, and they made a political point that might be uncomfortable to some, but they were not indecent.

Photos of scenes of Dianas death would have added nothing to the story. The cartoons were an important part of the news story, as were the additional "cartoons" used to stir world hatred. Also without having seen the I could not answer your question, as to whether they were decent.

[randomxnp]

(cont from below) The BBC decided to withold all this information from its reports, despite it being critical to the stated aim of news.

Why is risk of offense not part of news? In implying that, you are saying that Islamic terrorism, extremism and politics cannot be meaninfully covered, as anything critical of them risks causing offence.

[Markandrich]

Hang on... you're using the campaiagn against Jerry Springer The Opera - one of the best musicals ever made - as evidence of the BBC being bad? Surely that reflects on the media more than the BBC. Maybe that's true about the whole video...

[jefitz]

The BBC wouldn't air the Mohammed cartoons because the BBC didn't want "to give unnecessary offense" yet the BBC was quite happy to give offense to the millions of Christians in the country by airing "Jerry Springer The Opera" and ignore the 50,000 complaints it received. This is called BIAS and the BBC is guilty of it.

[toptop90]

this is proper critism of the bbc.unlike scientolgys

[jane100uk]

BIAS:

British Islam Against Society.

BBC:

British Broadcasting Complicity.

The state of being an accomplice; partnership or involvement in wrongdoing.

[c9dw2rm8]

BOYCOTT the B.B.C now!!!!!!!!!1

[ukcrusader]

Al-BBC Evil ?. Treacherous, contemptuous, arrogant, sanctimonious, anachronistic and outmoded definately. In complete agreement with the content. Ironically, in USSR the population wasnt forced to pay for a biased national TV and Radio Station. How do we turn BBC into PBS? Stop paying NOW en masse.

[Brannigan27]

Any chance of links to the articles from the video?

[NOTROUNDTHEBEND]

Hi Brannigan.

To find the articles from which the video was made (and hundreds more) go to the URL:

esnipsDOTcom/user/bigstory

You'll find them in the folders beginning 100-112

[Brannigan27]

Thanks for the quick reply. I was thinking of links just to the ones from the vid. However I now see you have to expand the folder list and am looking at some now. Thanks again.

[chunckwell]

Good work. But viewers should know that this is just the very tip of a very large ice berg. This video could have run for hours and hours. There simply is no end to the vile bias the bbc spews forth every day.

A monolith of socialist pc propaganda funded by a poll tax levied on the British people, that reaches every corner of the globe.

It sickens me to my very core.

[beebisbiasedbigtime]

Chunckwell - My thoughts exactly.

Try checking out biased-bbc.blogspot

This website is doing a great job identifying and recording BBC transgressions. With luck, the crimes the BBC are committing will come back to haunt them.

[NOTROUNDTHEBEND]

Excellent video! Well done FatherWarhol!

(If anyone would like to make their own video of BBC bias, you can download hundreds of images of press articles on BBC bias here:

esnipsdotcom/user/bigstory

They can be found in the folders beginning 100 - 112)