Added: 2 years ago
From: ChicagoTribune
Views: 31,947
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (111)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This moviee was good, not scary but look more like thriller than anything else. Like most of people, (SPOILER!) I found trully hard to watch the rape part, it was way too long for me

  • Bunch of sick fucks all of you.

  • this was good but i didnt get to see Sara Paxton's titties

  • Just watched this movie.. My heart was beating through that shit.. It was crazy haha

  • 3 stars, come on, I think it deserved at least 4. This is one on the very best remakes out there along with The Hills Have Eyes

  • @HorrorMovieExtras

    What about The Thing, The Fly, The Blob, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Cat People, Dawn of the Dead, Night of the Living Dead, Toolbox Murders, 2001 Maniacs, Little Shop of Horrors, I Spit on Your Grave, Piranha 3D, My Bloody Valentine 3D etc.?

  • @Johnlindsey289 Yeah, most of these are decent remakes too

  • @HorrorMovieExtras

    What did you think of The Thing and The Fly?

  • @Johnlindsey289 The Thing (1982) is a classic, I haven't seen The Fly yet. What are your best remakes?

  • @HorrorMovieExtras

    What i just mentioned

  • @HorrorMovieExtras lol the only reason it was a good remake was because the original was pretty crappy, so it's hard to be any worse....

  • the girl next door is a fucked up movie

  • you guys need to stop spoiling it for others

  • Dude, the guy reviewing it is a tool.

    The old one has the same damn lesson, it's just meaner.

  • this movie was alright. I didn't think it was scary.

  • Hated the first part, loved the second, just as it was supposed to

  • He like only described the plot

  • I like the original last house on the left more than the remake. The original last house on the left is like the original sweet child of mine by guns n roses while the remake of last house on theleft is like the sound track which is a cover verson of sweet child of mine.

  • you are fuckin sic!!

  • The rape scene was gross!

    Are you a pervert or something?

    Did u really enjoy that?

    You are a sicko!

  • Yes. Because wanting to be drawn to the characters and have personal investment in their future makes me racist. Without the scene, the parent's revenge would seem unnecessary and vulgar instead of justified and satisfying. That's why I enjoyed it.

  • Sure.Sure.

  • I didnt enjoy the scene.. it defs made me cringe. but it was essential to the movie. It was when the dad found otu his daughter was raped then he got angry and knew that he had to kill them.. I liked the movie though.

  • I love this movie. It's funny when his head explodes in the microwave!

  • Haha. I love that 2!

  • Not my type of horror movie. My type of horror movie is fear of the unknown type deals and a bit of variety. But in this movie, you knew what to expect, and you knew how the cards would play out eventually. The movie just plain pissed me off. Rapists and killers we see all too much. It's just like all the zombie movies they come out with. Stop with the remakes and fucking use creativity to make a unique masterpiece.

  • @Baruvan

    Why against remakes? have you ever seen The Thing, The Fly, The Blob, Invasion of The Body Snatchers, Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead, The Hills Have Eyes, King Kong, Cat People etc. all excellent remakes.

    And what do you feel about Torture Porn?

  • @Johnlindsey289 There are good remakes of course (especially the ones from the 80s), as well as there are bad remakes, which are much more recent.

    Last House on the Left, Hills Have Eyes and Dawn of the Dead are part of the bad ones. Soft, luxurious, commercial works made only for the money.

    Why shouldn't we be against bad remakes?

  • @writerblaster

    What do you think of torture porn like Hostel or Saw? do you think this one is like those two?

  • @Johnlindsey289 No I don't think so, for a simple reason: there's no torture scene in this remake, when there was in the original.

    This remake is desperately soft. Even the chainsaw is gone...

    I don't like torture porn, I mean the expression. But it does fit a movie like Hostel that I can't stand. As for Saw, I love the first film - which is not torture porn - and don't like the following ones who are torture porn, in a useless way...

  • @writerblaster

    Do you think Torture Porn is a response to the soft teen slasher flicks from the 90's? why do you love the original Last House and Hills so much? i thought the remakes were better. Do you think Night of the Living Dead 1990 and Dawn of the Dead were better than their originals? what about The Blob, Cat People, Cape Fear, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, My Bloody Valentine 3D, etc.? too much being in the past when you can't accept the new.

  • @Johnlindsey289 I didn't say that I loved the original Craven's films, I said that the remakes were bad. The remake of Hills is no good to me because it takes the victims of nuclear works and uses their difformed faces to make them the worst guys, it's almost racist.

    Anyway I can't talk about all the horror films on youtube. You're asking too much, I'm not a film critic anyway lol

    All I can say, I don't like the way they make horror films now. In some cases it's not even horror any more.

  • The Rap Was Scary...

    It's A Night-Mare For Meeh...

  • the movie was quite engaging and entertaining, however the last scene involving the exploding head felt out of place, i think that particular scene would have fit in context better earlier on in the film, it was merely there to present shck value,but on a whole the film was entertaining

  • I loved this movie......eXcept the rape scene bothered me.

  • Me 2! They could of cut it out or done something better.

    It made me feel weird and I almost wanted 2 throw up.

    How can people do that?

  • I gave it a C+. I bought it without watching it at the theater because it was recommended to me by a friend. It doesn't have a whole lot of plot but the kills are pretty good.

  • As horror movies go I'm sure it's good, but for some reason I miss the really bad cheesy horror movies like Jason, because they were unbelievable. I can't watch horror movies like this where things are too real. I just don't understand how people get a kick out of watching human suffering and how now there's this whole idea that the more realistic it is the better especially considering that this goes on in real life, that women really do get abused sexually. Just wanted to share my opinion.

  • I just bitch to bitch. I am an asshole on youtube (I admit it openly) and kinda find it fun to rant about something every now and then. Internet troll? Probably. Well I don't search all day for things I dont like. And you can call me what you want I don't really mind. People take this crap way too seriously. Just bored and expressing my exaggerated opinion. And my opinion is that you have no right to your opinion. ...I'm kidding.

  • First of all NICKMAN32 he didn't rape her in her ass dummy, and its just a fuckin movie, dont nobody care if you like it, so watch Transformers or something. This movie definantly gets 5/5 from me, the producer was very creative.

  • you must be from the south cus you aint able to write dummy

  • This movie is pretty good 4/5 from me, evil guy also has played a terminator, and pretty good actor. If you ask me people saying oh rape scene destroy the movie stop being so ignorant, same thing could be said about killing, if you want to be saint dont watch horrors retards.

  • congratulations you've successfully made an ignorant hate speech. Your just another internet troll looking for things to hate. Your basically the equivalent of a monkey throwing its shit at anything with substance. Hell this is one of the few movies out this year that was actually good aside from Gran Torino, Taken , and Watchmen. No know fucking likes you, or people that act like you. Why Don't you just kill yourself, so we don't have to listen to you bitch and wine about petty nonsense.

  • the movie is fucked up..rape scene wtf is with that...i love horrow but wtf is with a rape scene

  • @lachlanbozin

    u must be an idiot to go watch this remake movie and not even know a rape scene was it in

  • i think that this movie definitely deserved 5/5 stars its very good

  • they didn't put the rape scene in the trailer.. you have to watch the movie

  • Garrett Dillahunt makes anything palletable!

  • So professionals do reside on Youtube? Thank you for the facts based, sensible review! (breath of fresh air)

  • yo son, whatup

  • omg quit fighting ur both ruining the comment board. GROW the hell UP!!

  • im not a fan of remakes, nor did i care for the original, but this film appears to be fun to watch. so ill give it a try i spoze.

    im not defending truely twisted people im just gonna say its kinda jumping the gun to call someone sick or demented because they enjoy violent films, they are fun. sick and twisted would be someone who enjoys uwe bowls films.....AM I RIGHT? lol seriously someone please kill him his films invole more rape than this one did, and none of them have rape scenes!

  • no, you're not right. he has more money and fame than you. kill yourself please.

  • that has nothing to do with what i said douche, besides why on earth would u "try" to defend uwe????????????

  • because while he's not the greatest director, he's not the worst. just think of this name, ed wood. if you were smart you would understand, but thats giving you too much credit

  • the uwe thing was a joke but he is the worst director in my opinion because of what he does to my fav videogames. all i said is whats wrong with violent movies? ur calling me dumb yet ur the one who has to start shit by taking something that really had nothing to do with my point and tell me to go kill myself over it. seriously your one of the millions of douchebags on youtube that have to start shit with everyone for just stating their opinion. My only question is why? do you have a reason?

  • Omg!! You are so truee !! These freaks have a problem x

  • lol their just very immature. thanks for agreeing =]

  • this movie was good but nasty...it had a rape in it

  • I thought that was horrible! The rape scene was just too much for me. Although it got better at the end...it was still horrible

  • Saw and its seguels are the most incompetent movies i have ever seen. The first Saw was filled with holes in its story and the most forced ending in motion picture history. The director is either an idiot or he thinks the audience are just stupid enough to believe whatever he throws into his movie. Look hes been on the floor watching us this whole time, " What a bunch of unbelieveable crap"

    Last House on the Left kicks ass. Do yourself a favor and see it again.

  • i liked this movie allot

    5stars

  • Yet again hollywood makes another SHITTY horror remake this year. After seeing this, I am done with giving remakes a chance.

  • Some horror remakes are done in poor taste to merely amplify the violence. Yet with all the violence in this film I felt like it was done without over glamorizing it. Before I saw the remake I saw the original ' The Last House On the Left ' and I really didn't care for it so I knew the only place to go with the remake was up. I thought it was very well directed and it did what remakes are supose to do, and that is to be better than the original.

  • How would they be glamorizing rape? Its called a horror movie for a reason.

  • I didn't say they were glamorizing rape?!

  • "Yet with all the violence in this film I felt like it was done without over glamorizing it." Wrong choice of words, but ok.

  • remakes in general suck, some new movie ideas please

  • Why would you people review a movie in a genre that you dont seems to even like in the first place. the Last on the Left remake was amazing, i dont think they should have toned down the first half in the woods, those who call it torture porn are idiots and you need your art spoon fed to you, just like you were spoon fed such a stupid terms as torture porn, dont go see the movie if you cant handle it. and dont criticize a form of art that you dont understand just because you dont get it.

  • Chicago Tribune's Michael Phillips reviews the new 'Last House On The Left' movie remake.

    The Chicago Tribune is a excellent source for both movie reviews and book reviews.

    Pick up a copy of the Chicago Tribune at the news stand today.

  • I'm with KamuiTa

    Torture Porn isn't my thing, either.

    The violence in this film is ALL GRATUITOUS.

    All fingers and toes down.

  • gratuitous? As in not necessary? How so? That this should not have been in a movie or some misplaced opinion that the world really isn't a dark place where things like this truly exist?

  • ...and you're welcome to your opinion.

  • well of course i am-but i am still interested in hearing an answer to the question...

  • Ask a priest or rabbi for answers to your questions, flamer.

    If this is your perspective of the world, stop the Halo marathon and get out of your mothers basement.

  • oh now he gets defensive and starts the name calling. I watched the movie and came on youtube to see a review-then saw your post-and wished to have some discussion on it! You wanna call me a flamer or someone in a basement? Cute, but no. See, when people talk and someone asks a person why they feel a certain way about something- they usually back it up w some reason. You somehow continue to miss the boat dog! Dont get nervous, just answer the question!

  • Buy a puppy if you want to give commands.

  • still crying yet no answer is present!

  • Clearly a flamer.

  • little late to the party aren't we?! I'm a flamer yet you are coming after me what, four days after my comments?! That's almost as funny as your name!

  • The fact that you continue to reply makes it even funnier when dogstar and I make fun of you... for being a flamer.

    And what kind of name is tkl0085? DId you punch your keyboard, or is it short for tickle me 85? That would make you a flamer in more ways than one, sir.

  • and yet here you are responding back! Once again you fail to witness your own irony! You and dogstar are making fun?! Oh, i took that for failed attempts at explaining your positions! See, if it hurts either one of you to be asked to defend your position on a film-then you must be very convincing when you can't even answer! Sorry K, but i aint down for no tickling or whatever fantasy you conjure up-must not have much to do out there in KS huh?! You make this too easy!

  • What am I making it easy for you to do, look like a fool by yelling at a complete stranger for making fun of you on the internet? If you weren't so easily agitated I wouldn't bother writing back, but now I see you're taking this way to seriously.

  • Answering your original post, films that glorify gore or show too much are gratuitous, while films that only show some of it or have a climax where they show are not. If the film is a commentary on violence, like A History of Violence, there's a point to be made. If not, it's usually because the director thought it would be appropriate or to attract people who want to see stuff like that; in this case both are true.

  • cute how you assume what all directors think, as well as your "rock solid" definition of what (you think) makes a film's violence beneficial or gratuitous! Everyone's got an opinion, and yes, even kids from Kansas are allowed theirs!

  • your the one with the negatives, not me! Im not the only one who knows how retarded you and your lover dogstar are! Once again you reveal how ignorant you are with the whole stranger thing-once again you wrote me right?! Then you cry when i come back at you?! You are too fragile son! Agitated, no, amused? Yes! But if you feel you are making some martyr-like stand for the good of these boards-then come on back! I enjoy a good dialogue, as well as helping those bored Kansas kids!

  • Wow, tkl0085 is not only a flamer, but a lurker too.

    Somebody would think that you have personal stake in the movie's success to defend it so vehemently as to pounce on negative comments after what you yourself observed was several days. Are ultra-violent movies that dear to you?

    Well, in the meantime the Box Office told the story: Flop

    Thanks for playing

  • LOL

    Yeah, I'm done here. If I wanted to be insulted by 12 year olds with a violence fetish I'd go back to middle school. Enjoy your leisure years, asshole.

  • quite a witty response from a teenager! LOL indeed-you are so beyond that age bracket! And he talks tough too! Way to go out with class, once again failing to understand the human logic in explaining ones opinions! Enjoy and learn from those college years pup! Stay awake in class, and try not to doodle pictures of you and dogstar going at it while critiquing movies! Later Kansas! I though you'd last longer!

  • See, the thing is, I did explain my logic, about six posts ago, but you continued to attack me. I replied to you originally because I knew you would rant and rave under some pretense that you have an opinion that anyone at all would care about, and I was going to watch you dance and laugh. The game stops being funny when you make personal attacks about my sexuality and where I fucking LIVE. That's incredibly immature for someone who calls me "pup", and creepy even by internet standards.

  • knew you would be back-thats the spirit! No you didn't explain anything, when i was writing dogstar even he had nothing-but you had to be moderator and come at me, joining dogs "flamer" chants. You did this K! Creepy?! Me?! With you "going to watch me dance"? Okay, I got no plans of heading to KS, sorry pal! Immature is jumping into another's conversation, then that original flamer calling me a flamer! Cute but no dice! 3-4 days after my comments to dog-what the fuck do you call that teenager?!

  • I think you're reading a little too far into this one, padre. I explained my position on "torture porn", and explained what I know about film direction based on the schooling I've had on the subject.

    ...and I don't think you understand what flamer means, in this context it's someone who yells and curses themselves stupid on message boards, it wasn't until later when I was insulting you (you started it) that I made a quip about you being a flamer in the other sense. My comment was not a flame.

  • oh shut the fuck up already-you know damn well you butted in and now you wanna bitch, moan, and cry your way out! Dogstar insulted me first, i said that wasn't necessary and wasn't getting an answer, and u comes outta left field calling me the douchebag flamer?! Please teenage film student out of KS! I know what flaming is pup, just remind me who initiated the dialogue between me and you?! Exactly dumb shit, dont act like you didnt write anything leading to me coming after you! Teenagers for ya!

  • Yes, you came after me, because you're a flamer, and feel that if a stranger makes an offhand comment agreeing with someone who disagrees with you that it's a personal attack on your manhood and must immediately make them wish they'd never said anything. Thanks for proving me right.

    I'm not a film student, what I said is common knowledge, and I don't consider my age or state of origin pertinent to this conversation. Your appeal to ridicule is both insulting and fallacious, so stop it.

  • you are such a fucking joke K! You are too much! I don't think you agreed with dogstar by replying to a comment of his, but instead one of mine. You want to come out of left field and call me names when you were never involved-this is what comes of it! I read the words film and schooling-now its common knowledge! Fucking ignorant teens! You called me a twelve your old-but age is not PERTINENT! Nice vocab! You aint stopping shit son, because you are a walking contradiction, bored in Kansas! Pup!

  • I took a class in film, it's not my major, but it's common knowledge that directors make decisions (like violent content) based on the message and feeling they want to have in their films, duh.

    I didn't say you were 12, but that you were acting like it by yelling at me like a baby without a lolly. I'm 19, and acting like it by not SCREAMING at you, as you are doing to me. Insults aside, I'm trying to be reasonable and you're flipping the fuck out, so please calm DOWN.

  • K you are not a moderator, nor does your skill in both vocab and contradiction impress me! Duh! That vocab suits you! You come off as trying too hard to sound educated with your pertinent and fallacious! Lolly?! Right...This is called typing so screaming wouldn't be possible, nor do i capitalize all my words! So you admit to calling me a baby, a screamer, flamer, and someone flipping the fuck out?! And you want calm?! Cute kid, but your logic is a joke! Fuck you!

  • "This is called typing so screaming wouldn't be possible, nor do i capitalize all my words! So you admit to calling me a baby, a screamer, flamer, and someone flipping the fuck out?! And you want calm?! Cute kid, but your logic is a joke! Fuck you!"

    Try saying that out loud, according to the punctuation you used, without yelling or making it sound hostile. I dare you.

    No, I'm not overcompensating by using big words, I just like to use words that explain my position, which they do.

  • Nope, sorry, not hostile-kind of a mix of humor and amusement at teenager logic! Uses quotation marks too! They teaching you APA, MLA?! Ha! You are indeed overcompensating, and you come off lacking genuine rationale and conviction! What made you want to jump in? Amuse me! Or can you not admit you were trolling comments only to pounce on one that you didn't support?! Hmmm! Then you hit the jackpot meeting your love in dogstar! How priceless!

  • Clearly you have nothing left to contribute here. We aren't even talking about movies anymore, you're just making personal attacks. I might actually report you if you continue to imply that I'm an inferior person to you for being a teenager from Kansas, or that my sexuality is either known or relevant to you.

  • We never were talking about movies-me and dogstar were! You started the attacks so go ahead, puss out and run to make your little report, sounds like a teenager move! Trying to say i like to be tickled?! Who sounds like the little perv troll?! When you get older hopefully you'll realize what a dumbass you are-crying to other people for hurting your little feelings when you could have avoided the dilemma altogether! Run along little KS troll, run along!

  • Watchmen was a comic book movie, I don't get why you don't understand it's supposed to be stylized.

    I might see this though, anything is better than watching another Saw movie, and Hostel was never palatable enough to bother with, torture porn isn't my thing.

  • you are an complete idiot, as is everyone who uses the term torture porn. Saw and Hostel do suck i agree. But the torture porn label is an insult to fans of horror movies with a little splatter them. Hey you got anymore of that torture porn, i need something to jerk off too.

  • Well no, I'm not a complete idiot, and you're wrong, torture porn is a term to describe movies like Touristas and Hostel that are more gore than any type of substance or plot. The first Saw movie was extremely well put together, and shows how a little gore can go a long way as long as there's a competent story behind it. My issue is with Phillips, who insults Watchmen for being gory/ violent when it was a near panel for panel remake of a comic that was gory and violent. It's unfair.

  • haha if it prevents you from seeing any of the saw or hostel movies then yes I recommend this. ROFL

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more