@fatlardass2000 actually I bet that that is a celica gt not gts the gt makes a pathetic 140 the gts 180. hard to boost the gts due to the high compression. and if you do go stock for stock gts vs s2000 its really not that far apart because the celica is 400 pounds lighter
@seeroy1986 the s2000 has 240 hp 215-220whp, and the gts has 180hp or 140hp imagine what whp it has... so no the gts is FAR from the s2000, stock for stock. who cares if its 400 pounds lighter. the s2k has rwd ftw.
Why do people insist on hanging cameras out the windows all the time when they don't intend on editing the videos. Awwwwww yeah wind noise yo! sounds sweet brah.
@xoquixxoqafxo Toyota Sucks? LOL First of all, a TA22 set a record for compact cars with a 6.41 running a 2JZ this year. 2, Toyota sells more cars than Honda, as they are leaders in technology which they bestowed some knowledge to Ford, and was spotting GM for awhile, and they own 20% of Subaru. Oh, they also have their own City in Japan. Then we go to the cars... Supra.. King Dick. Then let's look at our other cars... Celica stock faster than any Civic stock. MR2 > Honda Beat.
The only idiot here is you. How the fuck does a civic compare to the dead celica... dumbass. MR2 dead. I Love how you are talking about dead toyota's... supra, the only toyota that was sweet... been dead for a while. I really don't give a shit that toyota sells more cars, just bc u sell more doesn't make them better. GM used to be #1 and they went bankrupt. Toyota is next with their reputation in the toilet from massive recalls. LFA is stupid, who pays $400,000 for a lexus? an idiot.
@xoquixxoqafxo I can go on all day why Toyota is better than Honda, boy. But I just think you need to do some research for yourself so save yourself from sounding like a complete idiot.
Honda had a super car too dumbfuck... its called the NSX which was around from 91-05 and while it was still expensive at 90k it was much more attainable to people, and it has a very loyal group of enthusiast... not so with LFA bc of the asking price of 400G. Imagine telling your friends... hey i just pissed away 400G on a lexus... maybe a Ferrari or Lambo NOT LEXUS. Good luck to toyota on trying to sell that.
@xoquixxoqafxo Did I not list NSX as sports car? But I suppose it could fall along the lines of Supercar, even though it is under 300hp, which even non-super cars even before that came with. So... Would that make the Supra a Supercar? Which puts out more power than the NSX? NSX was what? 260hp 280ft-tq? Which even MORE of those were obtainable. I think you forget too Toyota also had the GT-Four, which spanks. Get your JDM hondas, put them with JDM Toyotas.. Toyota is on top /topic.
Horsepower numbers aren't always important. NSX made 290 hp but weighed around 3000 lbs. 0-60 in the 4.6-5 sec range. Sure today thats not as impressive but back in 91 it was Ferrari Territory for much less money. Not to mention the NSX is still the most livable supercar to use as a daily driver today. Looks a hell of a lot better than the Supra to. Supra may have made 320 hp but it weighed some 600 lbs more. Besides, toyota has been building boring cars ever since they killed it in 96
Another thing that makes toyota supra suck is the fact that the Turbo model wasn't even available with a stick in 96... it had a 4 spd auto only... a sports car... with a 4 spd auto... fucking lame. Honda is known to build fun to drive cars more than toyota in the US. Maybe toyota is different everywhere else but in the US they are known for boring, lifeless, soulless, bland pieces of automotive transportation.
@xoquixxoqafxo Yeah, because we offer 6spd Camry's, Corollas, and way more cars that are pretty much maintenance free, which sell more, and will allow us to ultimately put out far better sports cars in the future... I. E. FT-86.
Look at the lineup... MR2 better than Honda Beat. Supra, better than S2k (S2k looks more fun to drive, I give it that) AND NSX, plus AWD cars to blush at. Did know you Toyota even owns 20% of Subaru? Say what you will... Fun to drive.. maybe. But not better.
wow, someone needs to get their facts first... the corolla has a 4 spd auto idiot. And the XRS... a lazy 2.4L camry engine? Please, I'll take a Civic Si with 8k redline any day. No car is maintenance free dumbass, I only wish you could hear yourself in theses responses, you make no sense and you can't spell shit. Like I said, the company that sells more cars doesn't make it better, the problem is toyota has way too many cars which is why they lost bilions of dollars last year.
@xoquixxoqafxo But you Touge the gay looking MR-S Toyota made (Cuz it's convertible, hard top is better) vs the S2k... I am pretty certain the MR-S will dance Circles around the S2k. Either stock, 2zz, or 2GR motor. It's just better balanced. Honestly, for having a nice line up, I will have to give the the props to Nissan for making family cars and keeping their Z car around.
Touge? that isn't even a word... wow. What the fuck is MR-S... there is no toyota in the US called that. Do some research before you leave ignorant comments. The S2K really does not have any natural competitors. No other car in its class had a 9k redline and made 120hp/liter naturally aspirated. It was essentially a 4 wheel sport bike. It had an extremely well balanced chassis bc it was really light weight. Fast doesn't always mean in a straight line, the S2K would win on a track
I would gladly put nissan way ahead of toyota. At least they know how to build fun to drive cars. I would gladly take a GTR or G37 over a shitty overpriced LFA or !S350
@xoquixxoqafxo How is it shitty when they are not making profit off of it? That is the cost it took to build it. But I do agree with you, as a Toyota guy, I am not about to say they are the best. Good at making reliable cars... Ok. They look nice? ok... Did they have their time in the 90's with bad ass cars? yes. But I do think they are better than Honda when it comes to what is out there (if you tally it all). However, I would imagine Honda cars are fun to drive... As..
I used to be a toyota lover, their cars from the 90s were great and so were honda's. I've driven everything toyota and honda has to offer. Toyota's sportiest offerings just aren't as impressive (supra excluded) Honda just inspire more driving confidence and fun. From even their mainstream Accords and Civics while Camry's and Corolla's are just bland and sloppy. IMO people who buy toyotas favor an isolated drive and ppl who like to drive favor Honda's. Both are reliable tho.
haha i seriously was a die hard toyota fan until i started driving Honda's! There are still a couple of toyotas i wouldn't mind owning: 94 Supra and First Gen IS300, LFA is mighty impressive but lexus is seriously asking way too much money for it... it should be $100k not $400k. Hell it should be a direct competitor to the GTR and thats 80k! Overall, I think both automakers have lost their ways. Toyota is more lost IMO, Honda just got lost when they killed the S2k last year.
@xoquixxoqafxo Well what do you think about the FT-86? Sucks we don't have any out to try out. But what do you think it is going to be like? Top Gear already added to the top 25 Must Have cars. I know for a fact the Subaru version will have 60 more hp though.
I saw it at the auto show, looks cool, I must give toyota credit tho for giving us concept sports cars and even lauching their first super car. I hope Honda starts doing the same. The economy is just soo shitty that Honda doesn't see a market for sports cars anymore. Im sure they will once the economy stabilizes. Only toyota 4 banger i like was the 2ZZ-FE from the Celica GTS, but it still wasn't as smooth as a B18C or K20 in the higher rev ranges. Honda still is king of 4 bangers :)
@xoquixxoqafxo Very true about the K20, but I wouldn't necessarily say king of 4 bangers. I would say king of N/A 4 bangers, and if they release a turbo car, then the world is going to get shaken up. But actually the 4g63 from Nissan is king of 4 bangers, just not reliable as Honda, Toyota or even Nissan for that matter. There is a guy, I can't remember his name, but look up Fastest DSM. He drives a 1st gen GSX and is in the 7's I believe.
@xoquixxoqafxo Oh, and I will add that Honda does make the best N/A 4 cylinder motors, putting out the most power. Although back in the day, Toyota did have a competitor known as the Beams motor, putting out 200hp as well, like the H22.
Even with future MR2 and future Supra, they won't be like they were in the 90's. I am certain the FT-86 will be much better than the AE86 though.
@xoquixxoqafxo that is the only reason I can come up with for everyone trying to fix them up. They do look nice though, I give them that. For street cars, they aren't bad, but they just don't seem like serious enough cars (the civics to say the least, again, excluding S2k and NSX).
see what happen when you both have windows open? he doesn't pass you. last time he passed you bc your windows were open, and his were close. it doesn't make a huge difference, but it does make a difference.
Your not going to get a s2000 for 1000 that can do crap w/o fixing why you got it for 1000. Taking a s2000 to drag is dumb, why buy a car that was designed for a corner and go straight with it? Want to drag by domestic. I own a s2000 and would never disgrace it by taking it to a drag strip.
i have race built celica turbo and beast scooby on around 10 psi i have just got stan alone ecu and it will be running around 18 psi trust me is fucking fast i have not lost race yet. but i havenot raced s2k but be sure to let you know who wins.
pretty sure your underestimating the power of not just hondas in general, but a fuckin s2k. Lets see you go buy a musle car for $1000, and have the power+handling to not only drag, but do raod/autocross too. Honda=all around.
Celica is only a GT, which has the 1zz engine, wihch is only 140hp stock, not the 2zz engine which is 190hp stock, so even with boost, s2k being NA, has better throttle response, the 1zz needs some good work to be a 'fast' car
It would of been a different race if the Celica was using his/her super turbo boost juice lol...
LiveFast77x 2 months ago
lol a celica? thats not a hard kill
xmodrock 4 months ago
was that vtec or the wind?
FershLicka 4 months ago
5/5 Great wind!
johnny2by4lmao 6 months ago 3
lol the celica looks better ha ha
TRDxxGTS 6 months ago
keep the roof up on the s2k next time haha, not a bad looking celica. kool
PIGGKILLA 6 months ago
no wonder its disliked so much, i wonder, maybe the wind
XxJxDEEZYxX 6 months ago
@fatlardass2000 actually I bet that that is a celica gt not gts the gt makes a pathetic 140 the gts 180. hard to boost the gts due to the high compression. and if you do go stock for stock gts vs s2000 its really not that far apart because the celica is 400 pounds lighter
seeroy1986 7 months ago
@seeroy1986 the s2000 has 240 hp 215-220whp, and the gts has 180hp or 140hp imagine what whp it has... so no the gts is FAR from the s2000, stock for stock. who cares if its 400 pounds lighter. the s2k has rwd ftw.
ceelow010 6 months ago
the fat sack of rice on the Celica gave it - 170whp
Dbetancourt92 7 months ago
i thought it was chick driving xD anyone else? haha
ane404738 7 months ago
honda for the win!
datsunboy43 8 months ago
i told you a cat was driving....
ChazWMathews 8 months ago
fake even boosted celica gt at 12lbs is much faster than n/a s2
birdman704 8 months ago
thumbs down for wind... i want to hear the cars givin er shit...
CropDuster33 9 months ago
All S2000s have bum clutches.
wantapgt 9 months ago
that celica even no turbo fuck that s2000 easy!!!!!!! so this is bullshit or anot driver for the celica...jejeje...
turbo4life1 10 months ago
@turbo4life1 You're not too car-smart...are you.
VTclass4roads 9 months ago
lol celicas
calloftehviking7 10 months ago
Was that a cat that meowed at the end? Lol
Jayjaychavez23 11 months ago
R.I.P speakers
jandarza 11 months ago
N/A RULES!!!
hondaresan 11 months ago
HONDA RULES!!!
BABYGODZILLA2009 11 months ago
Why do people insist on hanging cameras out the windows all the time when they don't intend on editing the videos. Awwwwww yeah wind noise yo! sounds sweet brah.
-_-
OBCblackhawk 11 months ago
@24okay 4g63 is from a Mitsubishi Evo not Nissan!!!
ashleyncwk 11 months ago
that car is not turboed
ozmo69 11 months ago
Brake Boosting ?
TXmatrix2nr 11 months ago
that celica needs a 2jz...
dwnrety1 1 year ago
ahhhhhhhhhhhhh my ears!!!
RicardoR5 1 year ago
Beaten by a Vtec...shame....
SiberianSloth 1 year ago
fuck celica...honda 4 ever
VtecScarface 1 year ago
@wesleyr1987
There is absolutely nothing wrong in taking an S2000 to a dragstrip
acuragsrx 1 year ago
it was good footage, but all i heard was the wind blowing
kokee96 1 year ago
Jesus close your fucking windows.
ManRossDamn 1 year ago
It's a GT that's why!
magicstik213 1 year ago
toyota sucks!
xoquixxoqafxo 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo Toyota Sucks? LOL First of all, a TA22 set a record for compact cars with a 6.41 running a 2JZ this year. 2, Toyota sells more cars than Honda, as they are leaders in technology which they bestowed some knowledge to Ford, and was spotting GM for awhile, and they own 20% of Subaru. Oh, they also have their own City in Japan. Then we go to the cars... Supra.. King Dick. Then let's look at our other cars... Celica stock faster than any Civic stock. MR2 > Honda Beat.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
The only idiot here is you. How the fuck does a civic compare to the dead celica... dumbass. MR2 dead. I Love how you are talking about dead toyota's... supra, the only toyota that was sweet... been dead for a while. I really don't give a shit that toyota sells more cars, just bc u sell more doesn't make them better. GM used to be #1 and they went bankrupt. Toyota is next with their reputation in the toilet from massive recalls. LFA is stupid, who pays $400,000 for a lexus? an idiot.
xoquixxoqafxo 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo I can go on all day why Toyota is better than Honda, boy. But I just think you need to do some research for yourself so save yourself from sounding like a complete idiot.
24okay 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo Oh yeah, keep in mind we have more cars too. Toyota/Lexus/Scion, oh yeah and we have Lexus LF-A, a SUPER CAR... Good luck to you.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
Honda had a super car too dumbfuck... its called the NSX which was around from 91-05 and while it was still expensive at 90k it was much more attainable to people, and it has a very loyal group of enthusiast... not so with LFA bc of the asking price of 400G. Imagine telling your friends... hey i just pissed away 400G on a lexus... maybe a Ferrari or Lambo NOT LEXUS. Good luck to toyota on trying to sell that.
xoquixxoqafxo 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo Did I not list NSX as sports car? But I suppose it could fall along the lines of Supercar, even though it is under 300hp, which even non-super cars even before that came with. So... Would that make the Supra a Supercar? Which puts out more power than the NSX? NSX was what? 260hp 280ft-tq? Which even MORE of those were obtainable. I think you forget too Toyota also had the GT-Four, which spanks. Get your JDM hondas, put them with JDM Toyotas.. Toyota is on top /topic.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
Horsepower numbers aren't always important. NSX made 290 hp but weighed around 3000 lbs. 0-60 in the 4.6-5 sec range. Sure today thats not as impressive but back in 91 it was Ferrari Territory for much less money. Not to mention the NSX is still the most livable supercar to use as a daily driver today. Looks a hell of a lot better than the Supra to. Supra may have made 320 hp but it weighed some 600 lbs more. Besides, toyota has been building boring cars ever since they killed it in 96
xoquixxoqafxo 1 year ago
@24okay
Another thing that makes toyota supra suck is the fact that the Turbo model wasn't even available with a stick in 96... it had a 4 spd auto only... a sports car... with a 4 spd auto... fucking lame. Honda is known to build fun to drive cars more than toyota in the US. Maybe toyota is different everywhere else but in the US they are known for boring, lifeless, soulless, bland pieces of automotive transportation.
xoquixxoqafxo 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo Yeah, because we offer 6spd Camry's, Corollas, and way more cars that are pretty much maintenance free, which sell more, and will allow us to ultimately put out far better sports cars in the future... I. E. FT-86.
Look at the lineup... MR2 better than Honda Beat. Supra, better than S2k (S2k looks more fun to drive, I give it that) AND NSX, plus AWD cars to blush at. Did know you Toyota even owns 20% of Subaru? Say what you will... Fun to drive.. maybe. But not better.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
wow, someone needs to get their facts first... the corolla has a 4 spd auto idiot. And the XRS... a lazy 2.4L camry engine? Please, I'll take a Civic Si with 8k redline any day. No car is maintenance free dumbass, I only wish you could hear yourself in theses responses, you make no sense and you can't spell shit. Like I said, the company that sells more cars doesn't make it better, the problem is toyota has way too many cars which is why they lost bilions of dollars last year.
xoquixxoqafxo 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo But you Touge the gay looking MR-S Toyota made (Cuz it's convertible, hard top is better) vs the S2k... I am pretty certain the MR-S will dance Circles around the S2k. Either stock, 2zz, or 2GR motor. It's just better balanced. Honestly, for having a nice line up, I will have to give the the props to Nissan for making family cars and keeping their Z car around.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
Touge? that isn't even a word... wow. What the fuck is MR-S... there is no toyota in the US called that. Do some research before you leave ignorant comments. The S2K really does not have any natural competitors. No other car in its class had a 9k redline and made 120hp/liter naturally aspirated. It was essentially a 4 wheel sport bike. It had an extremely well balanced chassis bc it was really light weight. Fast doesn't always mean in a straight line, the S2K would win on a track
xoquixxoqafxo 1 year ago
@24okay
I would gladly put nissan way ahead of toyota. At least they know how to build fun to drive cars. I would gladly take a GTR or G37 over a shitty overpriced LFA or !S350
xoquixxoqafxo 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo How is it shitty when they are not making profit off of it? That is the cost it took to build it. But I do agree with you, as a Toyota guy, I am not about to say they are the best. Good at making reliable cars... Ok. They look nice? ok... Did they have their time in the 90's with bad ass cars? yes. But I do think they are better than Honda when it comes to what is out there (if you tally it all). However, I would imagine Honda cars are fun to drive... As..
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
I used to be a toyota lover, their cars from the 90s were great and so were honda's. I've driven everything toyota and honda has to offer. Toyota's sportiest offerings just aren't as impressive (supra excluded) Honda just inspire more driving confidence and fun. From even their mainstream Accords and Civics while Camry's and Corolla's are just bland and sloppy. IMO people who buy toyotas favor an isolated drive and ppl who like to drive favor Honda's. Both are reliable tho.
xoquixxoqafxo 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo Well I suppose I can't argue with that.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
haha i seriously was a die hard toyota fan until i started driving Honda's! There are still a couple of toyotas i wouldn't mind owning: 94 Supra and First Gen IS300, LFA is mighty impressive but lexus is seriously asking way too much money for it... it should be $100k not $400k. Hell it should be a direct competitor to the GTR and thats 80k! Overall, I think both automakers have lost their ways. Toyota is more lost IMO, Honda just got lost when they killed the S2k last year.
xoquixxoqafxo 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo Well what do you think about the FT-86? Sucks we don't have any out to try out. But what do you think it is going to be like? Top Gear already added to the top 25 Must Have cars. I know for a fact the Subaru version will have 60 more hp though.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
I saw it at the auto show, looks cool, I must give toyota credit tho for giving us concept sports cars and even lauching their first super car. I hope Honda starts doing the same. The economy is just soo shitty that Honda doesn't see a market for sports cars anymore. Im sure they will once the economy stabilizes. Only toyota 4 banger i like was the 2ZZ-FE from the Celica GTS, but it still wasn't as smooth as a B18C or K20 in the higher rev ranges. Honda still is king of 4 bangers :)
xoquixxoqafxo 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo Very true about the K20, but I wouldn't necessarily say king of 4 bangers. I would say king of N/A 4 bangers, and if they release a turbo car, then the world is going to get shaken up. But actually the 4g63 from Nissan is king of 4 bangers, just not reliable as Honda, Toyota or even Nissan for that matter. There is a guy, I can't remember his name, but look up Fastest DSM. He drives a 1st gen GSX and is in the 7's I believe.
24okay 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo Oh, and I will add that Honda does make the best N/A 4 cylinder motors, putting out the most power. Although back in the day, Toyota did have a competitor known as the Beams motor, putting out 200hp as well, like the H22.
Even with future MR2 and future Supra, they won't be like they were in the 90's. I am certain the FT-86 will be much better than the AE86 though.
24okay 1 year ago
@xoquixxoqafxo that is the only reason I can come up with for everyone trying to fix them up. They do look nice though, I give them that. For street cars, they aren't bad, but they just don't seem like serious enough cars (the civics to say the least, again, excluding S2k and NSX).
24okay 1 year ago
wild wind
TheBirdynaMNam 1 year ago
put the camera inside the car stupid fuckin idiot!
akiskapouros 1 year ago
why all idiots put the cam out of the windows? :S
dimos12 1 year ago
see what happen when you both have windows open? he doesn't pass you. last time he passed you bc your windows were open, and his were close. it doesn't make a huge difference, but it does make a difference.
03basesedan 1 year ago
toyota got raped even with a turbo LOL
TheEuroperules 1 year ago
Your not going to get a s2000 for 1000 that can do crap w/o fixing why you got it for 1000. Taking a s2000 to drag is dumb, why buy a car that was designed for a corner and go straight with it? Want to drag by domestic. I own a s2000 and would never disgrace it by taking it to a drag strip.
wesleyr1987 1 year ago
-10 for wind sound
hoywatsdat 2 years ago 69
i have race built celica turbo and beast scooby on around 10 psi i have just got stan alone ecu and it will be running around 18 psi trust me is fucking fast i have not lost race yet. but i havenot raced s2k but be sure to let you know who wins.
MrTblame 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FUCK EM BOTH! American muscle beats them all...
jwalthersoccer 2 years ago
pretty sure your underestimating the power of not just hondas in general, but a fuckin s2k. Lets see you go buy a musle car for $1000, and have the power+handling to not only drag, but do raod/autocross too. Honda=all around.
Cd5Accord509 2 years ago 2
i would like to see you buy an s2000 for $1000 dollars.
xbartosx 2 years ago 6
its not hard at all.... you get one from the auction wrecked with a salvaged title
groundhabit 2 years ago
@groundhabit hahahahahahaha
xbartosx 2 years ago
Celicas are heavy as fuck and has little power in its engine, believe me the Celica is nothing compared to the S2K.
zeroangel25 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
celicas wiegh 1140kg, s2000 is 1249kg? and the engine in this celica has more hp per litre than a maclaren F1.
trendkill777 2 years ago
lol celicas arnt heavy and there at around 180 to the wheels for hp so there not slow or heavy.
Rendalneb69 2 years ago
lol. little power, i agree, but Celica is lighter than S2k just so you know :p
cjkhai 2 years ago
wow pretty darn good for a gt. gt-s would have taken the lead boosted
jhbrown08 2 years ago
if that was a turbo celica it seems a bad conversion or a very low boost turbo
yomonstruo 2 years ago
low boost turbo i think
GermyEnglish 2 years ago 2
FUCKING WIND NOISE
Mito2009 2 years ago 3
man an toyota Celica all trac will smoke that s2k.
phatdrifter 2 years ago
the celica still would had less power even with a turbo
not only that its got smaller engine and is heavy stightly .
only good racing when you have 2 or more cars with the same atribrutes
RaNdYbOlLcKStAiN 2 years ago
celica gts only has 180hp
mendieta408 2 years ago
read carefully "TURBO celica"
salieri7005 2 years ago 4
damn celica did pretty good.. gt has the lotus motor right? same as the carola xrs?
BBlacksi86 2 years ago
yeah the gt and lutos have the same motor... and celica gts and xrs same motor like the matrix xrs
celicatrd17 2 years ago
Can I ask how the Celica did "pretty good"?
G18c 2 years ago 4
he was toying w/ the celica lol
34psi 2 years ago
@34psi
haha i agree
TheZZ910 2 years ago
Celica is only a GT, which has the 1zz engine, wihch is only 140hp stock, not the 2zz engine which is 190hp stock, so even with boost, s2k being NA, has better throttle response, the 1zz needs some good work to be a 'fast' car
liquidhelix136 2 years ago
keep the camera in the car
Ibanez91 2 years ago 49
i can't see celica intercooler man
sameguyever 3 years ago
wow wtf drew needs a tune so fuckin bad ha well thats v-tec for u baby ohh and need i say the junk man air box self mod???
hpcrazy1771 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Imports are for short wimpy guys who pop their collars and like penis.
untaintableundies 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahahah saaaaaad. slow cars going at it.
karmahunden 3 years ago
bullshit
cjd959 3 years ago
Are you kidding me that toyota needs some more boost or somthing you killed that........
wbeeeeez 3 years ago
he does a little better in video 1
TheBlackSi 3 years ago 3
@TheBlackSi hahahahahahahaha a little....
adunn225 1 year ago