Added: 4 years ago
From: mAdHatt3rgirl
Views: 1,139
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • uhhhh about the 20min train thing just imagine how boring the movie would be (or any movie in general) if it showed 20 mins of people walking down a dark subway tunnel, have you ever watched is movies were real?

  • @cutting13strings *if movies were real

  • it was alright i mean the ending ruined it, but i liked the suspense and creppinezz.and it does have a story line get beth and get out of the city but they failed so yeah i still thought i was alright.the camera work was alright but i but when he held its straight i kinda liked there camera choice

  • thing with clover field, is that if that really happened, u would leave the camera behind, but then again their would be no movie, so its not really their fault

  • Actually the director and producer confirmed that in infact was sleeping underwater for hundreds of years. And the monster looks nothing like the angles.

  • The reason there wasn't any apparant storyline, is because the movie was created so it would be really real, and it had me convinced. Any other flaws you'd like to run past me? coz i really liked the movie and I'm always looking for other opinions :)

  • This is the real truth:

    (Of my 3 buddies, only Joe and I personally loved the movie) of the 100 plus in the theater, only Joe and I loved the movie. Seriously. I'm not exaggerating or being funny.

    Second of all, I think its funny that u got dizzy. I was a little annoyed, but it kept up the suspense, and YES u do get a clear view of the monster when it gets bombed.

    I have never seen that anime, but I am sure I have seen the monster somewhere else.

  • well i think cloverfield should have been Godzilla but no its a retarded alien... yay..

  • Wow, what a fu-king doush, if you watch the movie it was a baby alien, and aliens (Even though they may not exist) are SAID to be way more intelligent then us HUMANS. And in some remakes of Godzilla hes a dam Dino..... I think clover field is better then Godzilla, more realistic and scary. And if its called cloverfield WHY THE HELL WOULD YOU THINK IT WOULD BE GODZILLA? Are you fu-king stupid?

  • whats the song

  • mAdHatt3rgirl,the reason cloverfield has "no storyline" is because it is meant to be as close to reality as possible, and not the tried and true method of a camera covering every aspect of the movie like Godzilla or whatever.

    ==and what cellphone battery DOESN'T come fully charged?

  • well, uhmm, when i got my mobile phone battery from the shop, that was fully charged sooo, ummm

  • If there were going to be a sequel, I hope there would be a giant organic looking robot to fight the monster. That would be insanely cool.

  • that'll be awesome.

  • No... No no no... NOOOO.... You idiot, that wouldn't be realistic at all! You must be in the wrong video becuase THIS ISN'T POWER RANGERS.

  • Actually I was referring to Neon Genesis Evangelion. Yes it wouldn't be realistic, but neither does the cloverfield monster.

  • cloverfeild was based off a book and the angel thing looks nothing like the monster in cloverfield

  • it was?!? i thought it was an original then made into a comic/book/ or whatever.

  • I think you're, sacastically, trying saying that 'it's just a movie, get over it.' (if i'm wrong, sorry). Anywho, I kinda thought that the monster was one of the number one flaw in the movie, but i didn't want to say anything. Seriously, if they're going to make a monter movie simular to Godzilla, they could have made it a bit better.

  • Rofllmao, this is my 3rd comment and I already found so many IDIOTS in this video! If you want to make a REALISTIC MOVIE "Better" I would love to see you have a giant fu-king monster run through your town!

  • i wish it were true too. and you are one of four people that didn't make a 'mean' comment. kudos to you!

    i just couldn't stand the movie with all of the flaws; and it didn't help that my friends from New York kept saying, 'that's a 20 min train ride there, they can't walk there in 5 mins' and other things of that sort.

  • Eh, I thought the movie was okay. It wasn't too difficult for me to keep up with what was happening. I hope they remake it somewhat normally, though. Don't get me wrong; I think the producer's idea was pretty ingenious. The problem is that you simply can't make an effective movie that way.

    On a side note, I love Evangelion. And your theory near the beginning would be pretty neat if it turned out to be true.

  • dude your and idiot "there was no real storyline" are you really that dumb? the movie was intended to be real, like hud really happened to be carrying the cam when the shit whent down and as we all know in real life people don't give a backstory of their lives up to that point and there is no narrator that magicly knows everything that is going on

    look at it from the charictors point of view (witch is the reason of the handycam) and you will see the movie is full of meaning

  • if you're going to quote me, please quote me correctly. i typed '...there was no storyline..." and not, 'there was no real storyline." and no, i am not dumb....i can talk just fine (sorry, i have a sense of hummor^^)and i'm pretty sure that normal people wouldn't give a backstory to their lives....but if you just so happen to know, what is the storyline? Rob tries to save Beth and get out of new york....and is there anything else?

  • and besides, my whole rant was mainly about how the movie and the anime was simular... and some of the flaws.

  • ur a fukin fag pussy

  • ok guy, first off if you're going to insult me, spell out the insult correctly. (ie: You're a fucking fag pussy. Also, you're insult is stupid, either use 'fag' or 'pussy', not both, it sounds redundant. And if you enjoyed the movie so much, name one part that was so worthy to see it.

  • at 00:34 thats a bad pic, its not the right monster. the monster has a humanoid head and 6 really long legs and no tail

  • when i looked it up on photobucket, that's what came up. I assumed that's what the diretors wanted to look like.

  • it has a tail, and only 4 legs if you search for the action figure that will be out in september you will see there are plenty of pics of it and there is a tail

    also if you have not ordered the action figure yet you will not get one unless it's no ebay and expect to pay considerably more than the $100 the cost (i say somewhere between $1500-5000 as they are extremely low production, that is why i am glad i already preordered mine)

  • why the hell will i care about some doll??!!....i'm sorry, action figure. you already know that i hated the movie, so why the hell would i buy some doll from a movie i hate? are you sure i'm the dumb one here? (refering to several comments above this one)

  • I thought the same about Evangelion, I hope we are right, if this is the start then i like the movie (can be better), if its a oneoff then it sucked.

    Maybe this roller coaster was a way to hook the holywood audience to other kinds of story's like Evangelion.

  • just to let you know, JJ abrams said, that the monster was under the water for hundereds of years

  • I kinda figured that. it's still a crappy storyline.

  • what is this song? and kudos man haha i jsut realized it is like evangelion and i watched that like 5 years ago

  • Sorry guy, I found it on one my brother's burned CDs, so I don't know where it came from.

  • you're right about the flaws, but the guy says "it's been 7 hours." maybe the camera was on stand-by. you also should have talked about the 'jumping man' in the movie and how Lady Liberty's head was a bit too small.... maybe in the next rant you have.^^

    ~love ya always, big sis!

  • I was going to add the jumping man theory and mention about Liberty's head but the song ended.

  • Haha!

    Anyway, I was watching some of the other rants and whatnot, and most of them were talking about how great the graphic were. I think you should make another rant on how much you hate it when people base their opinion of the movie on the special effects; just like you did to Chris...That'll be funny.

  • No one likes Chris so we just deal with him. The special effects were good....but that's about the only thing good about it.

    If you base your opinion just on special effects alone, then you're a sad, sad person. I don't mind clif hangers, and the thing at the end of the movie was fine...but the movie was.....It could have been better.

    I just want my $5.50 back.

  • Why the hell did you buy the movie in the first place.

    Maybe you should have looked at the TRAILER. Ya fu-kin dumbass

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more