This is 1993??? OMG!!! His body is simply PERFECT. I dont see one flaw. How did he not win atleast 5 Sandow? Politics? Theres an old saying sometimes you can be to good.
I was never a Flex fan but this right here is obviously his best ever package. The definition is stunning. His full muscle bellies combined with incredible symmetry lines, and definition are purely outrageous.
@jmorgan87 to claim that symmetry wasnt a strength of FleX Wheeler is like saying Stevie Wonder has the best eyesight on the planet. That is completely absurd. Shockingly Ignorant
Let's continue to expose the STEROID (and other drugs/methods) users so people will know who the LOSERS are. The reason the ROIDERS get furious and want us to keep silent is because:
1. CHEATING in ALL SPORTS (PHONEY)
2. ILLEGAL (JAIL)
3. DANGEROUS (UNHEALTHY)
4.Some ROIDERS want to SCAM people into buying their line of supplements. It's the DRUGS that made them bigger,stronger and faster. Not their BOGUS supplements. (SCAM ARTISTS).
@xswijnji I think theres a point to which size should count. If they keep getting bigger and bigger they'll just look shit. Flex may not have been quite as big as Dorian. But Dorian looked shit compared to this. In fact what annoys me is where they expect bodybuilders to come back each year bigger and bigger and it end up ruining the shape. Ronnie Coleman being an example. He looked shit by the end of his reign and he was awesome in 1998. They shouldnt have to keep adding muscle every year
@gordonjohnd It should be........'ok your the same size / detail as last year. Equally as good. And hey, no one else has matched you this year so you win again'. Not............'oh you didnt evolve enough so you lose'. There's only so much a body can gain before it looks shit. Its like painting a portrait. Once you get to the point where it looks best, if you keep adding paint past this point it will start to look worse. Same with adding too much muscle
@gordonjohnd lol you dont get it, simple as that.What you dont understand, is that dorian would still "look like shit" no matter what size he is what you fail to realize is that Flex looks the way he does because of his genetics, he is simply born with better shape.Just like how some people are simply born with more beautiful faces, its the same way with muscle shape.Why reward someone for something they are born with?More size = more muscle, dorian had more muscle, and was more cut
@xswijnji No. I do get it. I know mucsle looks the way it does due to genetics. But he still had to work at his proportions etc. And yeah i think he should have beaten Dorian. Dorian had a shit look due to genetics, tough! U said why reward for what he was born with? Well it happens all the time in the world. And you could argue about "what you were born with" all day long. You could argue the ability to get to a certain size is genetics (as well as a good pharmacist). But its still rewarded.
@gordonjohnd another thing you fail to understand, is that its not about how they look alone in these videos. The judges dont just look at each guy then pick a Mr. Olympia,Ronnie won year after year BECAUSE of his improvements, or else jay would have surpassed him.Bodybuilding contests are won during prejudging,during quarter turns(hope you know what that is).when everyone is standing next to each other being compared, thats when the majority of the contest is judged and determined.
@xswijnji i know all this. Im not failing to understand anything. Ive been into this stuff for 12 years. Were obviously not gonna agree on this but I defo thing Flex should have at least won 1 Mr. O
@gordonjohnd he never deserved an Olympia because he was never the best bodybuilder in the world at any point in time, hence why he never won an O. He could have won in 1997, but his lazy ass backed out. He never came in fully conditioned, he was always known to cheat on his diet constanty during contest prep.his genetics is what carried him, he shouldnt be given the title for something he was born with. its not a beauty pageant
@xswijnji Your totally wrong guy, Flex didn`t have genetics at all.. Try to find some some photos or videos when he first started competing about 1986 or 87, He looked pitiful. He was scrawny with narrow shoulders and tooth pick arms and chicken legs.. It`s absolutley amazing how much mass he was able to put on an ectomorphic frame.. He was at his best at the 99 olympia when he finished second to Ronnie Coleman.. I personally think he should have beat Ronnie that year
@Goldenchild795 Well he did have very nice round muscles and great muscle tendon lengths with an extremely small waist, regardless of all the hard work these guys put in they all have their genetic strengths and flaws, im not saying genetics are everything or not important, but anyone can transform their skinny or fat bodies into a beautiful body through extreme hard work, food intake and dicipline.
Flex imo had the best muscle structure of almost any bodybuilder in my opinion.
@Goldenchild795 lol, you idiot. when I speak of genetics, Im speaking of MUSCLE SHAPE. i said that already, flex was born with beautiful lines and muscle belly shape, thats why he looks good. he has great aesthetics. i wasnt speaking of structure or metabolism. If you want to give credit to Flex because he put on alot of mass, then why do you think he should win against guys who have more than him? in 99, flex was smaller, less proportionate, and less ripped. why should he have won?
@Goldenchild795 1999 was Ronnies best year, you have no idea about bodybuilding. you say he "added so much mass" but then you think he should win even though he is smaller and less ripped than other guys. hypocrite
This is the best Flex has ever looked 218 lbs he was and that my friends is the perfect package not like what is displayed now adays with the Frankenstein freek way..
i wouldnt called it bullshit, not either fan of flex or yates, but 1993 was the best yates of his career. unfortunately it ended being flex best olympia too thanks to a car crash. if flex came in like that every year after that he would of mr.o
acctualy he was below 2.5...i know samir bannout and he was once lower than 2% BF...he said he could see his kidneys working! NO BULLSHIT! but you are right...your in the deadzone with such low numbers!!!
Flex deserved to win if it wasn`t for the political bullshit from the Weider clan..Hey Weider federation thanks for ruining the sport with the GH abuse going on...Flex cudo`s to you for turing the other way and going natural nothing is impossible with the strong will and drive you can achieve mind blowing muscle without the shit.....Ronnie and the mafia clan would be nothing without the juice..
This is 1993??? OMG!!! His body is simply PERFECT. I dont see one flaw. How did he not win atleast 5 Sandow? Politics? Theres an old saying sometimes you can be to good.
gungfu777 9 months ago
roids
steroidsR4losers 9 months ago
ahhh come on!! hahaha 0.0%! skinfold doesnt count when in contest shape, water also makes skin thiner...
southernsicko13 11 months ago
Forget Shawn Ray, this man is the best bodybuilder not to win the Olympia.
meetchvb 1 year ago 2
He is truly the best bodybuilder who never won the Mr. Olympia
RogerBB92 1 year ago
I was never a Flex fan but this right here is obviously his best ever package. The definition is stunning. His full muscle bellies combined with incredible symmetry lines, and definition are purely outrageous.
Rvd420WHAT 1 year ago
He looked so much better at this weight before he tried to get freaky big.
TheTypicalGirl 2 years ago 23
That goes for most bodybuilders. They try to gain as much mass as possible and end up lossing symmetry and detail.
william629 2 years ago
Wrong. His strength wasn't his symmetry, it was his round muscles. Bigger round muscles equals better bodybuilder.
jmorgan87 1 year ago
Okay. I never said symmetry was his strength. I probably said it about Comier a few times.
william629 1 year ago
@jmorgan87 to claim that symmetry wasnt a strength of FleX Wheeler is like saying Stevie Wonder has the best eyesight on the planet. That is completely absurd. Shockingly Ignorant
Rvd420WHAT 1 year ago
@Rvd420WHAT Yeah well my right quad is 27.5 lean while mye leftbis only 26.5
jmorgan87 1 year ago
so agree this was the best he ever looked,too bad too much dieretics killed his kidneys
kalel38 2 years ago
@TheTypicalGirl and he looked much healthier...
lolo932 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Let's continue to expose the STEROID (and other drugs/methods) users so people will know who the LOSERS are. The reason the ROIDERS get furious and want us to keep silent is because:
1. CHEATING in ALL SPORTS (PHONEY)
2. ILLEGAL (JAIL)
3. DANGEROUS (UNHEALTHY)
4.Some ROIDERS want to SCAM people into buying their line of supplements. It's the DRUGS that made them bigger,stronger and faster. Not their BOGUS supplements. (SCAM ARTISTS).
Stay natural buddy!
steroidsR4losers 9 months ago
@TheTypicalGirl lol he never got freaky big.... which is why he never progressed past this point.
xswijnji 7 months ago
@xswijnji I think theres a point to which size should count. If they keep getting bigger and bigger they'll just look shit. Flex may not have been quite as big as Dorian. But Dorian looked shit compared to this. In fact what annoys me is where they expect bodybuilders to come back each year bigger and bigger and it end up ruining the shape. Ronnie Coleman being an example. He looked shit by the end of his reign and he was awesome in 1998. They shouldnt have to keep adding muscle every year
gordonjohnd 6 months ago
@gordonjohnd It should be........'ok your the same size / detail as last year. Equally as good. And hey, no one else has matched you this year so you win again'. Not............'oh you didnt evolve enough so you lose'. There's only so much a body can gain before it looks shit. Its like painting a portrait. Once you get to the point where it looks best, if you keep adding paint past this point it will start to look worse. Same with adding too much muscle
gordonjohnd 6 months ago
@gordonjohnd lol you dont get it, simple as that.What you dont understand, is that dorian would still "look like shit" no matter what size he is what you fail to realize is that Flex looks the way he does because of his genetics, he is simply born with better shape.Just like how some people are simply born with more beautiful faces, its the same way with muscle shape.Why reward someone for something they are born with?More size = more muscle, dorian had more muscle, and was more cut
xswijnji 6 months ago
@xswijnji No. I do get it. I know mucsle looks the way it does due to genetics. But he still had to work at his proportions etc. And yeah i think he should have beaten Dorian. Dorian had a shit look due to genetics, tough! U said why reward for what he was born with? Well it happens all the time in the world. And you could argue about "what you were born with" all day long. You could argue the ability to get to a certain size is genetics (as well as a good pharmacist). But its still rewarded.
gordonjohnd 6 months ago
@gordonjohnd another thing you fail to understand, is that its not about how they look alone in these videos. The judges dont just look at each guy then pick a Mr. Olympia,Ronnie won year after year BECAUSE of his improvements, or else jay would have surpassed him.Bodybuilding contests are won during prejudging,during quarter turns(hope you know what that is).when everyone is standing next to each other being compared, thats when the majority of the contest is judged and determined.
xswijnji 6 months ago
@xswijnji i know all this. Im not failing to understand anything. Ive been into this stuff for 12 years. Were obviously not gonna agree on this but I defo thing Flex should have at least won 1 Mr. O
gordonjohnd 6 months ago
@gordonjohnd he never deserved an Olympia because he was never the best bodybuilder in the world at any point in time, hence why he never won an O. He could have won in 1997, but his lazy ass backed out. He never came in fully conditioned, he was always known to cheat on his diet constanty during contest prep.his genetics is what carried him, he shouldnt be given the title for something he was born with. its not a beauty pageant
xswijnji 6 months ago
@xswijnji Your totally wrong guy, Flex didn`t have genetics at all.. Try to find some some photos or videos when he first started competing about 1986 or 87, He looked pitiful. He was scrawny with narrow shoulders and tooth pick arms and chicken legs.. It`s absolutley amazing how much mass he was able to put on an ectomorphic frame.. He was at his best at the 99 olympia when he finished second to Ronnie Coleman.. I personally think he should have beat Ronnie that year
Goldenchild795 6 months ago
@Goldenchild795 Well he did have very nice round muscles and great muscle tendon lengths with an extremely small waist, regardless of all the hard work these guys put in they all have their genetic strengths and flaws, im not saying genetics are everything or not important, but anyone can transform their skinny or fat bodies into a beautiful body through extreme hard work, food intake and dicipline.
Flex imo had the best muscle structure of almost any bodybuilder in my opinion.
isurugi 6 months ago
@Goldenchild795 lol, you idiot. when I speak of genetics, Im speaking of MUSCLE SHAPE. i said that already, flex was born with beautiful lines and muscle belly shape, thats why he looks good. he has great aesthetics. i wasnt speaking of structure or metabolism. If you want to give credit to Flex because he put on alot of mass, then why do you think he should win against guys who have more than him? in 99, flex was smaller, less proportionate, and less ripped. why should he have won?
xswijnji 6 months ago
@Goldenchild795 1999 was Ronnies best year, you have no idea about bodybuilding. you say he "added so much mass" but then you think he should win even though he is smaller and less ripped than other guys. hypocrite
xswijnji 6 months ago
@xswijnji I think it was 1998..
Enanurri 5 months ago
@TheTypicalGirl
he wouldn't have been able to win the later contests without more size
TheUglyDuckling123 4 weeks ago
Why is this steriodsr4 losers guy on every bodybuilding video?
ryanvlasic 2 years ago 19
This has been flagged as spam show
...
steroidsR4losers 2 years ago
yeah ur skinfold could never get that low!!
But jesus christ he is in shape!! RIDICULOUS!!!
mrCooper09 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
...
steroidsR4losers 2 years ago
This is the best Flex has ever looked 218 lbs he was and that my friends is the perfect package not like what is displayed now adays with the Frankenstein freek way..
kalel38 2 years ago 2
i wouldnt called it bullshit, not either fan of flex or yates, but 1993 was the best yates of his career. unfortunately it ended being flex best olympia too thanks to a car crash. if flex came in like that every year after that he would of mr.o
sportnwood2001 2 years ago 2
0.0 hahha get the fuck out of here the lowest you can get is 2.5 adn then your borderline dead
sportnwood2001 2 years ago
acctualy he was below 2.5...i know samir bannout and he was once lower than 2% BF...he said he could see his kidneys working! NO BULLSHIT! but you are right...your in the deadzone with such low numbers!!!
markobegus 2 years ago 2
Best back ever in bodybuilding
2bsure 2 years ago
Flex deserved to win if it wasn`t for the political bullshit from the Weider clan..Hey Weider federation thanks for ruining the sport with the GH abuse going on...Flex cudo`s to you for turing the other way and going natural nothing is impossible with the strong will and drive you can achieve mind blowing muscle without the shit.....Ronnie and the mafia clan would be nothing without the juice..
kalel38 2 years ago
He was 30lbs less compare to Dorian Yates that year.
Naturalhit 3 years ago
Flex was 218 here..not 235
kalel38 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
...
steroidsR4losers 2 years ago
how he didnt win. thats bullshit weider mafia.
rbonilla18 3 years ago 2
DAMMNNNNN!!! hes a big dude
RevReckage 3 years ago