because they're, you know, like kinda abnormal, not like us kinda like real normal guys I think that uh the er know-nothing U ptight S exual A ssholes will say next that no one normal knows enough to normally er wank until they're abnormally 18!
I don't think it's fair to call the film bullshit... it was released in 1962, and there were quite a lot of restrictions put on what could be filmed and how. it was even dictated what the actress HAD to look like down to her breast size. The writer of the novel created the screenplay for this, as well. He had to censor himself. We can get away with taboo subjects much easier now than they could in '62.
I think this is alot more true to the novel than you may think.. I mean, think of all of the dark humour that Nabokov twisted into his novel. Kubrick did the perfect job in bringing out that really dark but humourous side of Lolita.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
god this is awful! i don't know why this is regarded as better than lyne's. kubrick uses it as a vehicle for sellers' comedy. the mood is al wrong. sue lyons is a good actress but she lacks sensuality. and the slapstick with the black porter is just uncomfortable. this has dated really badly and reminds me of a lot of other peter sellers comedies from the early sixties.
did you saw peter sellers on "beign there"?..he's just awesome, funny & sad..natural and all like you said...plus he did the other roles like the indian guy from "the party"..in that one he gives us chaplin and keaton...r.i.p..peter...great movies..good old times..cheers!
hi!!...he was terrific on dr strangelove too...so good...he was an man character off and on screen....cheers!....ps: beign there was trully sad & funny...i was a little sad about the character when the movie ended...i dont know why...well...and the new dvd remaster of beign there is awesome too..but i wish the criterion collection would release it properly in a 2 disc dvd edition & a bunch of extras and stuff....plus fancy artwork..it would be nice :)
Oh, definitely.. he was amazing in Dr. Strangelove (during all three roles!) I think so too, he was definitely a very interesting but talented person.
I did too, but I really loved the ending of Being There, it was a total surprise to me what happened. I'd like to see that. I want to get it on Blu-ray, maybe.. that would be nice. I think that would be a good idea too.. :)
It's not that he's a bell boy. It's the use of the incompetent black man as a source of comedy. Since he cannot understand social graces, he speaks loudly and childishly. Also, beyond his cluelessness, he has no idea that Humbert's use of the cot is a ruse, since Humbert REALLY wants to get inside the bed beside Lolita. Blackness is not the central issue, although it contributes to the notion of sexual deviance contextually.
Awwwwwwwwwwwwwk waaaaaaaaaaard!
BarnabasFrid 5 months ago
'You have a most interesting face, goodnight.'
I use this quote so much in everyday life.
IRobertMarah 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thumbs up if you wanted to just punch the guy wouldnt stop stumbling over his words
FurFeathersAndScales 6 months ago in playlist Lolita 1962
Comment removed
FurFeathersAndScales 6 months ago in playlist Lolita 1962
Peter Sellers is seriously SCARY.
Calucifer13 6 months ago
Uhhh!!!!!!!!
salnabila 9 months ago
The cot scene is hilarious!
MoriartysSaloon 10 months ago
Peter Sellers is awesome!!!!!!!!!!
j3wrnmiguitarist 1 year ago
Having Peter Sellers in a scene with James Mason is deliciously naughty in its own right.
AmusedChild 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
The fine fiction 'Lolita' is about as true to real pedophilia-adultophilia as the fine fantasy 'James Bond' is to real spying.
Both =squat minus zilch.
LOL-ita.
DougPatton1 1 year ago
Sue Lyon Is the hottest girl EVER....Sue, If you're out there, I'm your BIGGEST fan and will NEVER forget you.
Cheops2112 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
because they're, you know, like kinda abnormal, not like us kinda like real normal guys I think that uh the er know-nothing U ptight S exual A ssholes will say next that no one normal knows enough to normally er wank until they're abnormally 18!
LOL-ita.
DougPatton1 1 year ago
The 1997 version is definitely more true to the novel than this one... but both are pretty good.
TRussell148 1 year ago
good acting and quality for a 1962 film
Hobbyist56 1 year ago 2
"because I'm a normal guy......." yammer yammer yammer yammer....
haha
I love it
TeamZissouMember 1 year ago 3
I love Quilty's voice haha. Idk what it is about it, but I always end up laughing, I love it lol
Myan852 1 year ago 2
"you have a most interesting face, goodnight." lol love him.
MixeryBuxinexx 2 years ago 3
God, Quilty is SOO creepy in the '97 version....I just can't believe how Lolita would like that guy....ugh.
SFforlife 2 years ago 6
I think that the 1997 version was more true to the novel, but this movie is certainly hilarious and a classic!
roshylov 2 years ago 3
The 1997 remake made me cry!
Jeremy Irons is so much better!!![2]
LolitaHazeCI 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
THIS MOVIE IS PURE BULLSHIT!!!
I'm almost finished with the novel, and I can say that the '97 remake is a lot more true to the novel, as well as more interesting!
JEREMY IRONS IS SOOOO MUCH BETTER!!!
gridergirl 2 years ago
I don't think it's fair to call the film bullshit... it was released in 1962, and there were quite a lot of restrictions put on what could be filmed and how. it was even dictated what the actress HAD to look like down to her breast size. The writer of the novel created the screenplay for this, as well. He had to censor himself. We can get away with taboo subjects much easier now than they could in '62.
JacksVendetta 2 years ago
I think this is alot more true to the novel than you may think.. I mean, think of all of the dark humour that Nabokov twisted into his novel. Kubrick did the perfect job in bringing out that really dark but humourous side of Lolita.
ACOFan19 2 years ago 2
gosh in this scene James Mason looks and sounds so much like Sam Neill, that's so weird.
Spider0Web 2 years ago
James Mason (Humbert) sounds so much like Jeremy Irons. In some spots it's almost like they dubbed in Irons' lines from the 97 remake.
NightmarePictures 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
god this is awful! i don't know why this is regarded as better than lyne's. kubrick uses it as a vehicle for sellers' comedy. the mood is al wrong. sue lyons is a good actress but she lacks sensuality. and the slapstick with the black porter is just uncomfortable. this has dated really badly and reminds me of a lot of other peter sellers comedies from the early sixties.
freedomemotion3 2 years ago
I get carried away being so normal and everything too sometimes.
smilingladybird 2 years ago 2
I Don't Understand Why He Just Started Babbling to Humbert?!
CeramicVideo 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
es una verGA!
mayly4ever 3 years ago
What a normal performance from Peter Sellers. Must come naturally to him, being so normal and all.
wilca59 3 years ago 9
LOL!
JoeChrisMorris 3 years ago
did you saw peter sellers on "beign there"?..he's just awesome, funny & sad..natural and all like you said...plus he did the other roles like the indian guy from "the party"..in that one he gives us chaplin and keaton...r.i.p..peter...great movies..good old times..cheers!
godardtruffaut 2 years ago 4
Being There is one of my favourite movies. :) He really was awesome, and I think he was amazing in Lolita.
ACOFan19 2 years ago
hi!!...he was terrific on dr strangelove too...so good...he was an man character off and on screen....cheers!....ps: beign there was trully sad & funny...i was a little sad about the character when the movie ended...i dont know why...well...and the new dvd remaster of beign there is awesome too..but i wish the criterion collection would release it properly in a 2 disc dvd edition & a bunch of extras and stuff....plus fancy artwork..it would be nice :)
godardtruffaut 2 years ago
Oh, definitely.. he was amazing in Dr. Strangelove (during all three roles!) I think so too, he was definitely a very interesting but talented person.
I did too, but I really loved the ending of Being There, it was a total surprise to me what happened. I'd like to see that. I want to get it on Blu-ray, maybe.. that would be nice. I think that would be a good idea too.. :)
ACOFan19 2 years ago
we want criterion!!!
godardtruffaut 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why does the colored man keep talking so loudly???
jennahaze1982 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what's up with quilty? is he squizophrenic or what?
i dont like this version, 1997's rules!!
lala00lala00 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I LUV the '97 version more!!!:D
maba7x 2 years ago
not enough sex
loren1283 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In reaction to one of the comments below, Peter Seller, as talented as he is, is NOT God - that is highly blasphemous.
LLCoolestL 3 years ago
it's blasphemous how TALENTED Peter Sellers is!
electricbubbles 3 years ago 15
Have you met god, by chance? =P lmao
JacksVendetta 2 years ago
little bit of racist humour there from the fifties ...
south0park04ever1 3 years ago
Why? I didn't see racism in the fact that a person being bell boy.
carvalcob 3 years ago
Not really, but the the fact that he was so clumsy and constantly had to be hushed by Humbert
south0park04ever1 3 years ago 4
It's not that he's a bell boy. It's the use of the incompetent black man as a source of comedy. Since he cannot understand social graces, he speaks loudly and childishly. Also, beyond his cluelessness, he has no idea that Humbert's use of the cot is a ruse, since Humbert REALLY wants to get inside the bed beside Lolita. Blackness is not the central issue, although it contributes to the notion of sexual deviance contextually.
Recusal 3 years ago
this is from the sixties
jennahaze1982 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
itssssssssss soooo boringggggggggg
jusztinecute 3 years ago
so weird, quilty didn't come across this way in the book.
ralphp1800 3 years ago 3
"I get sorta carried away you know, being so normal and everything."
ahahhah
Jenniferka 3 years ago 18
Well yeah, this guy is amazing. "I mean, you really look normal, yeah, a normal guy with a pretty little tall lovely girl" ... ;D
Feamelwen 3 years ago 32
PETER SELLERS IS BASICALLY GOD.
OBuddha 4 years ago 31