Copan : God as the best explanation 2 of 5 Apologetics

[Xaulted]

Those that ask "Who made God?" fundamentally misunderstand what it is their asking about. IF God exists, then he is the greatest being/entity ever. So He must be all knowing, all powerful, omnipresent, all that stuff... Thus 'Who made God' assumes that God is something that can be made in the first place, but how can something with those properties be made? And if he could be made by someone, THAT would be God. You have to get to the end all somewhere, or else it's an infinite regress.

[gilams09]

The question Who made God? is an irrelevant question that leads to nowhere. This game of 'who made who and so on and so on' cannot be answered by anyone. This is flaw logic to justify reason that God doesn't exists. If you see a beautiful garden in front of a house, you can conclude there is a gardener. You may never see the gardener, but he/she is there. You don't ask who made the gardener.

[Timmay123456789]

but you could ask who made the gardener. And if you want to find the origin of everything, you'd go beyond the gardener. So yes, asking who or what made god is a valid question.

[jimius]

Zero arguments that impress or can be taken seriously.

If our "consciousness" needs a creator who has a conscious himself to create it. But then, who made the consciousness of god? A supergod, but then who made the supergod?

If the answer is nothing needed to create god, then the same applies to humans and animals alike.

[braino2000]

First to comment woot!! Good video series grand, as always your posts impress me.