Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow. and he actually believes the drivel he is spouting.

  • i think this debate shows the logical argument as presented by Islam and the illogical argument as presented by the doctrine of Roman Catholic Christianity which was formulated by the establishments made by the council of Nicea. the protestants only partially refuted the claims of the catholic church but were not equipped to fully come to the correct conclusions which Islam absolutely clarifies concerning Jesus. i believe even David Secombe is having doubts about the doctrine he has studied.

  • This David looks kind, I like him unlike David Wood that hypocrite.

  • I could not help but notice how Mr. Shabir said of Matthew "in his copy of Mark". This is assuming that all the Gospels copied from Mark.

    Perhaps he believes that the Gospel of Mark is the Q source? I'm really not sure why he said Matthew copied from Mark rather than having presented his narrative of the events without copying another text. Either way, these aspects cannot be substantiated properly.

    A good debate however :)

  • No scholars have nearly unanimously agreed that Matt and Luke copied from Mark and that there is a q gospel source that even mark got his info from.

  • great arguement................sssss­sssssss

  • the cross is the 2 parrelel that came and passed making sigh before there were number numeral there was tally and the

  • virgin version sound the same spelling maybe inspellcheck correction

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more