I will help people out. To those of you that are really into religion and dont know enough about science.
Have you ever wondered what causes that burning feeling like fire? Like WW1... BIRTHOLITE is what got me thinking. Birtholite is kinda like mustard gas. People in Iraq should know all about mustard gas. Have you ever wondered what causes that burning feeling on you (or in you)?
What causes those reactions to give you that burning feeling are GASES but there is "stuff" you dont see.
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
I Love The Video It Can Increase My Knowledge Atoms and the sub-atomic particles they're made of are far too small to be seen, even with the most powerful microscope
Good, I like that you share this video, I wish success always Atoms and the sub-atomic particles they're made of are far too small to be seen, even with the most powerful microscope.
Nice Video That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You Matter is all the stuff that we see, feel, and smell around us. By definition, matter has mass and takes up space
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Atoms and the sub-atomic particles they're made of are far too small to be seen, even with the most powerful microscope
@complains2much Actually that is from the Bohr model of the atom. In the modern model the electrons form a sort of "cloud" in which you can only calculate the probability of finding the electron in the "orbit" at any given time.
Besides electrons act more like waves than particles.
@Kalohuxify - there we go....the rational mind at work...i can see electrons moving through dimensions...this would make it appear as if they are popping in and out of existence....but not eve God can pop in and out of existence....
Does not explain anything. I feel like even the narrator was unsure of the subject. Explore further if you're interested in these kinds of things. I promise, it only get's more interesting, if you can keep up =]
@USTASEZADOM That's one of the problem with these 'educational videos', the graphics can be misleading. It happens a lot and people get these wild ideas like what an atom's supposed to look like.
But it's not just videos, scientists are also guilty of bad public communication.
This video is really nice and all but she still doesn't show us how scientists know that quarks exist, she just goes "Well herp derp scientists say so and you'll just have to believe it". Not exactly informative.
Quran 2:255)There is no god but He, the Living the Self-subsisting Eternal. No slumber can seize Him nor sleep. His are all things in the heavens & on earth. Who is there can intercede in His presence except as He permits? He knows what before or after. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He wills. His Throne does extend over the heavens & on earth, & He feels no fatigue in guarding & preserving them for He is the Most High, the Supreme (in glory)”
@gapicek oh i gotcha. i always imagined it like the rubber band theory. if thats what its called. how when the universe gets big enough, its slingshots back on itself. then expands due to friction and gravity (friction caused by gravity)
@eatingtacos000 it is not known. Quarks can theoretically not be found alone, they are always with other quarks which have their color charges carried by gluons.
Unfortunatley it is currently impossible to get a single quark on its own(because of the force gluons have on the quarks within the nucleus), but you pose an interesting question.
We can now see atoms with the naked eye using microscopes! they have videos on youtube. i guess its big news if it was 2007, but sitll....The thought it amazing...
@SuperRustyTrumbone - yeah that's right cause then nothing has any purpose or meaning...so much better....besides evolution is impossible....so just keep denying reality fuck nuts....
@fowzie777 If you ask a religious person why they think a god exists, the only answers you would get is:
.because i wan't to
.just because i know he is real
.because i believe
.because my parents said so
.because the bible said so(which holds no evidence of god)
However, scientific theory makes sense if you actually study it, but that wont happen because all you religious people are in denial for the fact that you wont have an afterlife.
@SuperRustyTrumbone Agreed. What is death? Really? Religious people want to believe that when they die, they go either Heaven or Hell. Personally, i think that when people ''die'' they will be ''reborn''. If you want me to further explain, i will send you a message.
@santu662I think the reason reincarnation theory started was because the leaders of poor ancient civilizations wanted their citizens to be happy with the occupation they have even if they have to scoop shit their whole life. They would have remained content because they were told they would be reicarnated and have a better occupation. they thought there next life would keep getting better then the previous one. I think it's the perfect solution to unrest and at the same time have happy citizens.
@santu662 I think the reason reincarnation theory started was because the leaders of poor ancient civilizations wanted their citizens to be happy with the occupation they have even if they have to scoop shit their whole life. They would have remained content because they were told they would be reicarnated and have a better occupation. they thought there next life would keep getting better then the previous one. I think it's the perfect solution to unrest and at the same time have happy citizens
@dradulemihawk In theory I would agree, but in every group you will have good and bad, and most people are somewhere in between. Humans corrupt everything. People will torture and kill and die for all sorts of reasons, including Atheist Communist ideals, and Secularism. Fanatics in every political and religious or irreligious movement merely use Causes as justification for their psychopathic or selfish ends.
GOD particle exist within Human body which is CERN Laboratory of Nature.for details see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA ans read article on all voices.com -certainty-tool-is-higgin-boson-or-god-particle-which-exist-in-human-body.We have already developed next generation easy to learn unified science.world scientist atr welcome to see and test FIT-Future Imaging Tool technology.FIT technology forecast tsynami,IRENE Hurricane
hey i just came up with a new theory while i was high. its called the 2bit theory. there is either a positive or a negative and that is the law of everything that exists / existed / will exist. Examples : it either exists or it doesn't exist / either positive and negative matter (dark matter) and even complex things like good and evil. if u look around everything in the world has 2 sides. and then multiple things other than + and - form from combining + - in different patterns like a computer
I recently became interested in particle physics and quantum mechanics to the point where I considered taking some courses just for the interest, but after watching some vids and seeing how people react with these topics, I may not bother. The way people cling to their ideas regarding these matters seems akin to religious dedication, and I have no desire to become a part of that. Don't believe me? Just look in the comments at how people attack each other for having different views in any video.
@ishingo69 yah, but this is youtube. home of the trolls. particle physics and quantum mechanics are fascinating topics. I'd suggest you simply read up on it on your own. Libraries and classes wouln't be full of moronic comments like here. The Cosmic Landscape, and The Black Hole War by Leonard Susskin are excellent. Atom: a single atom of oxygens journey by Laurance Krauss is another fantastic book.
@roont I like to see that there are some cool, helpful people out here that are interested in these topics. Thanks for the advice. I gonna do some of the online lectures and lessons and go from there.
@ishingo69 quantum physics is crazy, but what i find really captures the imagination is astronomy. check out this channel SpareRip. This stuff is mind blowing. and there's not too much math!
@ishingo69 yeah, there's usually a lot of judgmental, condescending assholes on both sides fighting it out in these threads. i just ignore the negative ones. they dont represent the ideas. im agnostic and im always searching for answers. these religious battles are absolutely pointless
All particals are aware of each other and even learn from each other, therefore, what on earth or and the universe are you teaching these particals, is it that others may follow suite but without a machine or the hand of man. I Sure hope you ppl R part of the divine plan that really does bring GOoD into this world & abundent happieness, love & Joy for ALL.
Perhaps as structures seem to be infinitely larger (stars, star clusters, galaxies, galaxy clusters) structures may be infinitely small. (I honestly don't believe the "observable universe" to be the *entire* universe.)
@jasonguyperson If something is infinitely small, that means it must contain an infinite amount of different structures. That means all that is is contained in one particle. If it didn't contain absolutely everything you can imagine it wouldn't be infinite, just think about it.
So basically, every particle contains all that exists?
@RuPeeSandLaMpoiL Not exactly. You are excluding every other particle in your analysis. I wasn't implying an "infinite amount of structures," but rather "structures which are infinitely small."
I disagree with your assumption that "If something is infinitely small, that means it must contain an infinite amount of different structures." Although an infinite amount of structures is theoretically possible, it doesn't include the addition of new mass or even bosons.
@jasonguyperson But a structure being infinitely small means that within the structure, there are more structures and within that structure there are more structures and so on and on to INFINITY.
In infinity, there is always more to explore. Nothing ever ends or repeats itself so somewhere in that infinity, something you conceive of must exist, otherwise it wouldn't be infinite, it would repeat itself and be periodical or just finite and you could count the diff. structures.
@RuPeeSandLaMpoiL Well, think of it this way. The number .999999999 (repeating) is an infinitely continuing number. But simply because the number continues infinitely doesn't mean the number must eventually exceed the number 1.
@jasonguyperson - something cannot be infinitely small in reality only theoretically. infinity is not a concept that finite minds can grasp...its like thinking of another primary colour...
@fowzie777 I wasn't implying an actual occurrence of infinity; only the progression towards it. If you can comprehend subtracting one from any number, then you can comprehend an infinite progression.
Holy fucking monkey shit that was awesome to read!
My favorite part was when Heimdal888 pointed out that Kohversohver had just forfeited the debate with the words "personal insults, and name calling, the last resort of the one w/o any argument left."
I also came when Kohversohver said hydrogen had a neutron... fuck... I'm a nerd.
@ThePlatoon4 They 'observe' 'particles' by proxy. In a collider they have a variety of detection methods that allow them to infer 'particle' by the energy states observed following collisions.
Larger 'particles' such as atoms can be 'seen' [I know lots of ''s but it saves qualifying everything] by other methods.
Look up electron microscope for an idea of how you might 'see' an atom.
It does not get said enough: people do NOT need to READ more physics books and expositions of physics books (e.g. like by Hawking) in order to get a better understanding of physics (relativity, quantum, low-power, environmental, bio-, whatever). One needs to DO physics. Since we don't have our own labs, that means doing the mathematical homework exercises.
(I capitalized only 3 words. That's ok, right? That wasn't excessive, was it?)
4-20-2012 You got a job? Go on strike until they legalize cannabis! It's the only way to get full scale recreational legalization! Be the change! All you have to do is spread the word to everyone you know and every website you visit! Start a chainmail, get pro pot organizations involved. Blog about it. Like it. Thumbs up this message everywhere you see it! Let this message grow like a weed! We are the Marijuana Nation! On 4-20-2012 don't go to work instead toke up and protest! WE ARE DEFIANT!
@fntime I can answer that: because one is lucky in life to have the strength and energy and time to fight for even ONE cause in this life, even though one may care about many. That gives people the false impression that activists/class action lawyers/freedom fighter/soldiers/lobbyists - whatever you want to call them - fighting for a single cause, are "fanatics", when, in fact, if they had the time and money, they would tackle all the causes they want.
@mphello And a corollary to that: if you're the one in prison for any one reason -
e.g. falsely accused of a rape or murder and imprisoned due to a corrupt legal system
e.g. in prison for a law that shouldn't be in the first place - e.g. a communist law in Vietnam against owning a small business or personal marijuana sale and consumption in America -
it is physically impossible to fight for other causes until one is out of prison,
I was Wondring of WHY All the Planet in the Universe in not COLIDING each Other? Can you please elaborate it for me.. Thank You!- Dennis of the Philippines
I was Wondring of WHY All the Planet in the Universe in not COLIDING each Other? Can you please elaborate it for me.. Thank You!- Dennis of the Philippines
Protons, neutrons, electrons, positrons, neutrinos, quarks, leptons, byrons, mesons, pions, kaons, gluons, and the list keeps growing as an abstract from an imaginary plane. Non of it can be proved. If you consider instead that atoms are weaves of energy that interrelate as unique arrays of frequencies having distinct values which form families and communities of families of frequencies that weave to form atoms, you'd be fairly close to being able to design a means to synthetize atoms at will.
Black energy is the most destructive level of the frequency spectrum.These frequencies range way above the ultraviolet to a hyper level. Their wave lengths are so short that they can pervade even the tightest weaves of matter. These hyper frequencies are constituents of all matter to some degree.Fire radfioactivity, gamma rays,are some examples of energies that are dcirectly associated to black energy.If we are to consider that there is such a thing as anti matter consider black energy instead
Atoms are a simple devise of nature that define all that there is within the universe. By dividing earth's diameter by its age and working the problem down to the one second time period, you will end up with the average diameter of the atom which is 3 billionths of one inch, or 90 billionths of one milliometer. Atoms are weaves of energies that interrelate as families of frequencies. Quarks are abstracts of an imaginary plane that fail to define that which is real.
Is it the building blocks of Matter or the Building Blocks of an Atom. Because if there is such thing as anti-matter, doesn't that debunk the study of the Atom as the smallest particle that can exist?
@tnguyen318 Atoms are the smallest particles to still be elements. If it is not at least 1 atom it cannot be called an element. The subatomic particles like quarks are the smallest constituents of matter we've discovered. Anti-matter is the same as matter but with an opposite charge. Like the positron is the anti-particle of the electron and along with an anti-proton it could be able to form anti-hydrogen. Humans have not observed anti-matter in significant quantities.
The original meaning of an Atom was described by the Greeks as the smallest unit of measurement possible. Show me a photo of the smallest unit of measurement possible. How is that Photo Derived? Using the word Atom to describe the entire workings of something else that's "electromagnetic" will just confuse everybody. The word Atom should no longer be used, only what it is relative to and in the Text of Greek Science and Philosophy.
@tnguyen318 I think it might be only you that is confused by words. No scientist thinks an atom is indivisible, or that protons, electrons or quarks are particles in the ultimate sense. They use terminology that is tried and tested to allow them to communicate ideas.
@Woopeehole1337 They actually create and trap it routinely now in small quantities to experiment with. And there capture and retention methods are improving continually.
None of this is true. Ur all being fed lies by fake "proof". There is no such thing as what they r talking about. If u wish to know the truth I suggest reading the bible. That is where all is explained:)
@kate4978 say what? it doesn't? pls explain to me where it orbits. from what i've been learning,electrons orbit the nucleus of an atom within it's shell.
@699backstab come on now. the bible doesn't mention computers and a world wide web but they exist. you cannot SEE the world wide web and it obviously isn't mentioned in the bible...you should stop using the internet if that is your logic
@heimdal888 I am wrong,you are right,everyone is perfect in their own design.
Oh come on...you can't really believe that in this vast and endless universe YOU are right and I am WRONG? There is truth in every lie and a bit of lies in every truth.
Perfection is creation and all we have to do is enjoy the art.
I hope you can improve yourself when it comes to reading between the lines,because you obviously misinterpreted a lot of my truthy "lies".
@kohversohver "Prove that balance is not a force,without the help of theories or formulas."
...
....
.....
HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!! XD HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Holy crap dude, you are really something =') you sir, have really made me laugh, and i have to thank you at least for that. You're still wrong, but funny ... LMAO. Originally I wasn't going to answer but that comment was just too precious to let it pass.
Oh .... and you're welcome ... Schrödinger HAHAHA!! XD
@heimdal888 Best conversation on youtube yet.. Haha It was like reading a short story where a person gets OWNED from the inside out intellectually. What was so beautiful about it is it happened so smoothly. Bravo, sir, bravo. Make it into a play, it's a modern day Shakespeare.
@TheNakedQuack I am a stupid fuck, no more, no less than you. The only difference between being a stupid fuck like me and a stupid fuck like you is the fact that i don't go around telling other people the obvious without anything new or informing to say, which renders your comment as stupid as you...thank you for proving your intelligence :)
@kohversohver Hey man... what are you smoking?? Looks like you don´t get the mesage, you keep thinking that you can understand the entire universe, and it seems like you don´t like fisic... or you can´t understand it.
@JMCZA I do believe i understand the entire universe. In fact, i'm as old as this universe including you and everything else that's contained within it. My simple answer is this, there is no right or wrong in our universe. Why? Because everything evolves, including matter. The connections that these particles create result in the reality that we process and define with our logic. 13.75 ± 0.11 billion years ago it all begun. There were no molecules, no humans, no perception. Now there is.
@JMCZA The truth is that we know everything that we're supposed to know right from the start since birth, because the possibilities of thought in our brains are endless. But when we start to limit the way we think and discipline our mind, those other realities become impossible and imperfect in design. So we accept what we are told and base our assumptions on what interacts with our mind. I mean come on...religion is probably bullshit and yet it's one of the largest belief systems out there.
@JMCZA And although you can put out hundreds of facts that disprove the existence of god, people still believe in him. MILLIONS of people in fact. And although this might not sound like much of an example, i'm still going to put it out here, because i don't care what people think of my "sanity" or not. There are probably millions of people who would tell me to fuck off and millions who would agree with me. So that's not the issue here. But basically, let me put it this way. Emotions...
@JMCZA Let's take a look at these forces/emotions that are supposedly good and evil. Anger towards others and fear that results in more anger. And the direct opposite, love towards others. Love isn't bad in moderate quantities and anger isn't bad in moderate quantities. The balance. It's what yin-yang represents. You can't have one without the other. Just like you can't have life without death. Even stars are born and eventually die. Three cycles of life. Birth-life-death.
@JMCZA Now i think it's fairly obvious to state that you can't have people being born without some of them dying. Yin-yang is the same, you can't have one without the other. Birth-death,LIFE is just the time that you spend between your birth and your death. Just like Yin-yang is the result of yin and yang combined. The gears of our universe are put in motion by the very same principles. The CORE foundations. Time is a product of matter interacting with the space that surrounds it.
@JMCZA Space is the foundation in which matter can even exist and that is why it's referred to space-time,rather than matter-time. And these two(that create a third) major forces, that pretty much express in everything throughout this universe, are forces that the whole universe must abide to. They may be expressed in different forms such as light/dark birth/death past/future up quark/down quark proton/electron male/female. People have many names for it, but it's all the same. Yin-Yang.
@JMCZA Thus, i referred to balance as a force, because my view of the universe is very inductive. The positive force, that drives it all and the negative force, that allows interaction between Alfa and Omega. Imagine a universe that would only have birth and no death. Stars being born, but none of them dying. Impossible is it not? Perhaps the choice of words was wrong indeed. Balance is not a force. Balance is everything that results from the forces which are balanced. And everything IS balanced
@JMCZA If everything were not balanced within our universe, then from a imaginative perspective outside our universe the universe would not look like it is whole. Which means that the universe he is seeing, is not the whole. Something like god's view. A view that sees the beginning, the present and the future all rolled up into one big picture. It would HAVE to be balanced, because it would contain the beginning, the present and the future. Which means everything there is in our universe.
@kohversohver OK... looks like your mind has opened a bit more. I just pointed out that the word "Balance" as a force wasn´t the right word, and thus it created a bunch of misunderstanding. I agree with you in some of your ideas ´cuse I know the atoms in our bodies are as old as our own sun... thus we share a same origen. Balance is needed, but is not a force... it is important, but is the result of forces interactions...So, you needed to clear your head about what the word Balance really means
When scientists consider my theory as being more of a reality than a theorem, a properly constructed lattice chamber will be planed and construcet at a lesser cost than a particle collider that will prove to be more productive than chassing quarks or kaons, or pions or neutrinos! Then and only then, will we be able to see the reality of the universe as it evolved since the dawn of time.
Quarks as well as all other subatomic conglomerates of the atomic theory are a misconstrued myth that will never be proved. If you think of the atom in its simplicity as being made up of a weave of energies, you will be closer to the real thing. Divide earth's diameter by its age, work the calculation down to the one second time period, and you will end up with the average diameter of the atom or 3 billionths of one inch. Eventualy intrinsic lattices of matter will be synthetized in the lab.
@kohversohver "I rule my emotions,not VV" Yep, your response clearly shows it ;)
If you knew as much physics as you say you do, you would've seen that balance is not a force right away, instead you keep trying to pass your personal believes as solid theories, and they are not. So, you'r either willfully ignorant or purposely dishonest. In either case, is obvious you want attention, and I've given you more than enough, so relax, take a breath, and keep your theology and believes out science.
@heimdal888 You don't understand what balance is mate,i understand your equasion,but i'm talking about EQUILIBRIUM perhaps the use of the word BALANCE was too inadequate because i didn't know you would go all fucking newton on me.
Even E=MC2 is in balance.You affect one condition and the other ones change immediately.
I believe your perspective is too shallow to grasp my point.
Birth-life-death +=-
You can't explain the cyclic forces of the universe with some idiotic equasions i'm sorry.
@kohversohver lol Balance and Equilibrium are synonyms mate. Yes, E=mc2 is balanced, thats why its called an equation. "You can't explain the cyclic forces of the universe with some idiotic equations" but thats what you've been trying to do all along, with your mass/energy/time eq, the proton/electron/atom/holy trinity eq, and now with the birth/life/death "eq". Perhaps it is not my perspective that is shallow, but rather your point lacks clarity. Take a deep breath and try again tomorrow.
Rotate your electron.
munchluxe63 1 day ago
lol, electrons don't "rotate" around the nucleus
stiqula 2 days ago
Its like a chemical reaction I bet or something in the air. I dont know.
This is close enough to what got me going in a certain direction and its related to it.
DarkPrinceNH5570 3 days ago
I will help people out. To those of you that are really into religion and dont know enough about science.
Have you ever wondered what causes that burning feeling like fire? Like WW1... BIRTHOLITE is what got me thinking. Birtholite is kinda like mustard gas. People in Iraq should know all about mustard gas. Have you ever wondered what causes that burning feeling on you (or in you)?
What causes those reactions to give you that burning feeling are GASES but there is "stuff" you dont see.
DarkPrinceNH5570 3 days ago
This is one way how they figured out about LIFE.
You mean to tell me... there was no other way to put this together?
This is probably the way, the way they are going with this I just didnt look into it.
They are going off of things that the eye cant see. ATOMs and so on or matter. Not what you think.
DarkPrinceNH5570 3 days ago
Seriously? The collision causes sacred geometric Fibonacci spirals?? And I wonder if the quark is the consciousness effect of the particle?
mayanmanifestor 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
23rock3 1 week ago
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Matter is all the stuff that we see, feel, and smell around us. By definition, matter has mass and takes up space
kelekokerupuk 1 week ago
Why did they give the quarks such strange names? Just call them 'A1-A2, B1-B2,...'
Pfff.. scientists...
davydekemp 1 week ago
what's with galileo's derpass face?
IBPsychExperiment 3 weeks ago
I Love The Video It Can Increase My Knowledge Atoms and the sub-atomic particles they're made of are far too small to be seen, even with the most powerful microscope
indiage 3 weeks ago
@indiage would be boring to see them, the theory after all makes it so exciting in my opinion!
deyomash 2 weeks ago
Good, I like that you share this video, I wish success always Atoms and the sub-atomic particles they're made of are far too small to be seen, even with the most powerful microscope.
godguetar 3 weeks ago
Nice Video That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You Matter is all the stuff that we see, feel, and smell around us. By definition, matter has mass and takes up space
jutsmyface 3 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video From Your Matter is all the stuff that we see, feel, and smell around us. By definition, matter has mass and takes up space
jhoenedu 3 weeks ago
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Atoms and the sub-atomic particles they're made of are far too small to be seen, even with the most powerful microscope
croncong 3 weeks ago
Electrons doesn't "rotate". They pop in and out of existence.
Kalohuxify 1 month ago
@Kalohuxify Nothing can pop in and out of existence and obey the laws of physics. The electrons orbit around around the nucleus.
complains2much 4 weeks ago
@complains2much Actually that is from the Bohr model of the atom. In the modern model the electrons form a sort of "cloud" in which you can only calculate the probability of finding the electron in the "orbit" at any given time.
Besides electrons act more like waves than particles.
MrOpenstandards 3 weeks ago
@Kalohuxify - there we go....the rational mind at work...i can see electrons moving through dimensions...this would make it appear as if they are popping in and out of existence....but not eve God can pop in and out of existence....
fowzie777 1 week ago
Where do they get the anti - protons from.
dinoflagz 1 month ago
@dinoflagz the proton is supposedly comprised of one "up" and two "down" quarks, while the anti-proton is composed of one down and two ups.
ByRecentDesign 1 month ago
@ByRecentDesign actually it is the neutron made of one up and two down quarks, the proton is made up of two up quarks and one down quark.
MrOpenstandards 3 weeks ago
@MrOpenstandards Thanks.
ByRecentDesign 3 weeks ago
theres mini atoms on planes inside a atom. also it is 50% fine matter which is the energy u transfer to when u die not visable.
hawaiiguerilla 1 month ago
Does not explain anything. I feel like even the narrator was unsure of the subject. Explore further if you're interested in these kinds of things. I promise, it only get's more interesting, if you can keep up =]
wolf1010 1 month ago
Infinity isn't a number, It's the procedure of adding.
xBlackEditionx 1 month ago
@USTASEZADOM That's one of the problem with these 'educational videos', the graphics can be misleading. It happens a lot and people get these wild ideas like what an atom's supposed to look like.
But it's not just videos, scientists are also guilty of bad public communication.
'Cloud based' is also very misleading.
olmecbones 1 month ago
This video is really nice and all but she still doesn't show us how scientists know that quarks exist, she just goes "Well herp derp scientists say so and you'll just have to believe it". Not exactly informative.
PresAndrewJackson 1 month ago
@PresAndrewJackson You don't have to 'believe' it, you can just look at the math for yourself. Anybody can.
olmecbones 1 month ago
damn electrons are too far away from the nucleus
TurkiyeCumhurbaskani 1 month ago
WHOS HERE BECAUSE OF JOE ROGAN?
logoCSS 2 months ago
@logoCSS me
MeaningCorrupted 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
É o Lula? 0:14
Nayanny107 2 months ago
Comment removed
Nayanny107 2 months ago
Comment removed
sappinmytele 2 months ago
no, they wont, there is another universe in the atom.
the3rdnumber 2 months ago
Quran 2:255)There is no god but He, the Living the Self-subsisting Eternal. No slumber can seize Him nor sleep. His are all things in the heavens & on earth. Who is there can intercede in His presence except as He permits? He knows what before or after. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He wills. His Throne does extend over the heavens & on earth, & He feels no fatigue in guarding & preserving them for He is the Most High, the Supreme (in glory)”
marshalenam5 3 months ago
@marshalenam5 Do you actually think you're going to prove anything to anyone by quoting from a book written by a human being?
TheBiAtheist 3 months ago
@marshalenam5 looks like the lyrics of a death metal song or something , nice!!!
groveback1 2 months ago
2:04 ...thats how big bang happened, can you imagine what Im imagining??
gapicek 4 months ago
@gapicek who ever told you the big bang happened because of a collision???
RevolvingSanctum 4 months ago
@RevolvingSanctum I just imagine that men, no one really knows
gapicek 4 months ago
@gapicek oh i gotcha. i always imagined it like the rubber band theory. if thats what its called. how when the universe gets big enough, its slingshots back on itself. then expands due to friction and gravity (friction caused by gravity)
RevolvingSanctum 4 months ago
what happens if you smash two quarks together?
eatingtacos000 4 months ago
@eatingtacos000 it is not known. Quarks can theoretically not be found alone, they are always with other quarks which have their color charges carried by gluons.
smoki666x666 4 months ago
@eatingtacos000
Unfortunatley it is currently impossible to get a single quark on its own(because of the force gluons have on the quarks within the nucleus), but you pose an interesting question.
andrewcarlisle10 4 months ago
Have you ever wondered: If the whole world would be the size of a single quark. What would the size of the universe be?
nuppe10 4 months ago
Top and Bottom, so Quarks are gay...?
zezt 4 months ago
I think I live 2 minutes from an accelerator. I live near the university of saskatchewan and the machine is called the synchrotron am I right??
ScopedPewPew 5 months ago
@ScopedPewPew pretty sure its the large hadron collider or LHE
angeloCOZ 3 months ago
240p hello again
mrdrmc 5 months ago
orbitals, not orbits
MrRocketdog777 5 months ago
Nerdfighters! ( ' u ' )
HNABYN 5 months ago
@HNABYN DFTBA :D
rachel237linda 4 months ago
a quork?
MrBassist22 5 months ago
@MrBassist22 Yes a quork; how it should be pronounced.
OnlyLimazo 4 months ago
WHAT UP DFTBA!
bambamsamsh 5 months ago
We can now see atoms with the naked eye using microscopes! they have videos on youtube. i guess its big news if it was 2007, but sitll....The thought it amazing...
CoolConejo 5 months ago
What are protons and neutrons made of and what do we know about quarks?
MrPersonwithaface 5 months ago
Is this from the 1960's?
Moontanman 5 months ago
I have no problem with god. Its just his fan club that bothers me.
dradulemihawk 5 months ago 149
@dradulemihawk its amazing, the structure of the universe is all based on the structure of an atom. Its incredible, the design of everything.
SamuelJCir 4 months ago
@dradulemihawk you have problems with spelling, sonny.
PawelWysocki 4 months ago
@dradulemihawk well spoken
Shockszzbyyous 4 months ago
@dradulemihawk How can you not have a problem with him?
Carpenter4134 1 month ago
@dradulemihawk i have a problem with god, he (assuming he's real) causes all the disasters. fuck god!!
atheism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SuperRustyTrumbone 2 weeks ago
@SuperRustyTrumbone - yeah that's right cause then nothing has any purpose or meaning...so much better....besides evolution is impossible....so just keep denying reality fuck nuts....
fowzie777 1 week ago
@fowzie777 If you ask a religious person why they think a god exists, the only answers you would get is:
.because i wan't to
.just because i know he is real
.because i believe
.because my parents said so
.because the bible said so(which holds no evidence of god)
However, scientific theory makes sense if you actually study it, but that wont happen because all you religious people are in denial for the fact that you wont have an afterlife.
SuperRustyTrumbone 1 week ago
@SuperRustyTrumbone Agreed. What is death? Really? Religious people want to believe that when they die, they go either Heaven or Hell. Personally, i think that when people ''die'' they will be ''reborn''. If you want me to further explain, i will send you a message.
santu662 3 days ago
@santu662I think the reason reincarnation theory started was because the leaders of poor ancient civilizations wanted their citizens to be happy with the occupation they have even if they have to scoop shit their whole life. They would have remained content because they were told they would be reicarnated and have a better occupation. they thought there next life would keep getting better then the previous one. I think it's the perfect solution to unrest and at the same time have happy citizens.
SuperRustyTrumbone 3 days ago
@santu662I Sorry, that last post was supposed to go to santu662 not santu662I.
SuperRustyTrumbone 3 days ago
@santu662 I think the reason reincarnation theory started was because the leaders of poor ancient civilizations wanted their citizens to be happy with the occupation they have even if they have to scoop shit their whole life. They would have remained content because they were told they would be reicarnated and have a better occupation. they thought there next life would keep getting better then the previous one. I think it's the perfect solution to unrest and at the same time have happy citizens
SuperRustyTrumbone 3 days ago
@dradulemihawk In theory I would agree, but in every group you will have good and bad, and most people are somewhere in between. Humans corrupt everything. People will torture and kill and die for all sorts of reasons, including Atheist Communist ideals, and Secularism. Fanatics in every political and religious or irreligious movement merely use Causes as justification for their psychopathic or selfish ends.
aurian555 1 week ago
Wow, u Christians just can't shut up about ur "god".
crby101 5 months ago
our universe is just a blasted atom
fluxmaden 6 months ago
@fluxmaden Yeah it is kind of mindfuck.
RichtoffenRoach 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD particle exist within Human body which is CERN Laboratory of Nature.for details see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA ans read article on all voices.com -certainty-tool-is-higgin-boson-or-god-particle-which-exist-in-human-body.We have already developed next generation easy to learn unified science.world scientist atr welcome to see and test FIT-Future Imaging Tool technology.FIT technology forecast tsynami,IRENE Hurricane
vk sonakia
unified field scientist
bhopal
INDIA
vksonakia@yahoo.co.in
vksonakia 6 months ago
anti protons / protons. everything just seems to prove my awesome theory.
luniarxox 6 months ago
@luniarxox Wish is?! =D
RichtoffenRoach 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey i just came up with a new theory while i was high. its called the 2bit theory. there is either a positive or a negative and that is the law of everything that exists / existed / will exist. Examples : it either exists or it doesn't exist / either positive and negative matter (dark matter) and even complex things like good and evil. if u look around everything in the world has 2 sides. and then multiple things other than + and - form from combining + - in different patterns like a computer
luniarxox 6 months ago
I recently became interested in particle physics and quantum mechanics to the point where I considered taking some courses just for the interest, but after watching some vids and seeing how people react with these topics, I may not bother. The way people cling to their ideas regarding these matters seems akin to religious dedication, and I have no desire to become a part of that. Don't believe me? Just look in the comments at how people attack each other for having different views in any video.
ishingo69 6 months ago
@ishingo69 yah, but this is youtube. home of the trolls. particle physics and quantum mechanics are fascinating topics. I'd suggest you simply read up on it on your own. Libraries and classes wouln't be full of moronic comments like here. The Cosmic Landscape, and The Black Hole War by Leonard Susskin are excellent. Atom: a single atom of oxygens journey by Laurance Krauss is another fantastic book.
roont 6 months ago
@ishingo69 or if you were interested in classes, you can get lectures online, youtube and elsewhere too.
Check some of Susskinds lectures.
watch?v=hbmf0bB38h0
and Richard Feynman is an awesome scientist who could easily explain complex subjects to laymen.
watch?v=v3pYRn5j7oI&feature=related
Don't give up on learning just because of a bunch of morons in the comments section of videos.
roont 6 months ago
@roont I like to see that there are some cool, helpful people out here that are interested in these topics. Thanks for the advice. I gonna do some of the online lectures and lessons and go from there.
ishingo69 6 months ago
@ishingo69 quantum physics is crazy, but what i find really captures the imagination is astronomy. check out this channel SpareRip. This stuff is mind blowing. and there's not too much math!
/watch?v=dTY3sVA2wOw&feature=feedrec
roont 6 months ago
@ishingo69 yeah, there's usually a lot of judgmental, condescending assholes on both sides fighting it out in these threads. i just ignore the negative ones. they dont represent the ideas. im agnostic and im always searching for answers. these religious battles are absolutely pointless
dafunkywhitedude 5 months ago
All particals are aware of each other and even learn from each other, therefore, what on earth or and the universe are you teaching these particals, is it that others may follow suite but without a machine or the hand of man. I Sure hope you ppl R part of the divine plan that really does bring GOoD into this world & abundent happieness, love & Joy for ALL.
Yanco888 7 months ago
Every thing around you are the result of the balanced within our universe
runytry 7 months ago
@runytry
I've read your comment 5 times and have concluded that your grammar is so poor that it is preventing me from understanding you.
drche420 7 months ago
A neutron walks into a bar. "how much for a drink here anyway?" to which the bartender responds, "for you, no charge."
Two atoms are in a bar one says "i think i lost an electron" the other says, "are you sure" to which the other replies, "i'm positive"
mohammadjj 7 months ago
Perhaps as structures seem to be infinitely larger (stars, star clusters, galaxies, galaxy clusters) structures may be infinitely small. (I honestly don't believe the "observable universe" to be the *entire* universe.)
jasonguyperson 7 months ago 24
@jasonguyperson Sir. I was trying to post something, and you read my thinkings... can you even imagine
gapicek 4 months ago
@jasonguyperson
Infinite recursion? Maybe if you descended through the heart of an atom you'd appear on the outer fringes of the cosmos. Ouch, my head.. 0_0
PairInstabilityType 2 months ago
@jasonguyperson If something is infinitely small, that means it must contain an infinite amount of different structures. That means all that is is contained in one particle. If it didn't contain absolutely everything you can imagine it wouldn't be infinite, just think about it.
So basically, every particle contains all that exists?
RuPeeSandLaMpoiL 2 months ago
@RuPeeSandLaMpoiL Not exactly. You are excluding every other particle in your analysis. I wasn't implying an "infinite amount of structures," but rather "structures which are infinitely small."
I disagree with your assumption that "If something is infinitely small, that means it must contain an infinite amount of different structures." Although an infinite amount of structures is theoretically possible, it doesn't include the addition of new mass or even bosons.
jasonguyperson 2 months ago
@jasonguyperson But a structure being infinitely small means that within the structure, there are more structures and within that structure there are more structures and so on and on to INFINITY.
In infinity, there is always more to explore. Nothing ever ends or repeats itself so somewhere in that infinity, something you conceive of must exist, otherwise it wouldn't be infinite, it would repeat itself and be periodical or just finite and you could count the diff. structures.
RuPeeSandLaMpoiL 2 months ago
@RuPeeSandLaMpoiL Well, think of it this way. The number .999999999 (repeating) is an infinitely continuing number. But simply because the number continues infinitely doesn't mean the number must eventually exceed the number 1.
jasonguyperson 2 months ago
@jasonguyperson - something cannot be infinitely small in reality only theoretically. infinity is not a concept that finite minds can grasp...its like thinking of another primary colour...
fowzie777 1 week ago
@fowzie777 I wasn't implying an actual occurrence of infinity; only the progression towards it. If you can comprehend subtracting one from any number, then you can comprehend an infinite progression.
jasonguyperson 1 week ago
@jasonguyperson i totally agree with you its such a precarious thing to think about yet fascinating
BassPlayerGuy123 1 month ago
That's a good question will it?
luminositymusic 7 months ago
@kohversohver
@heimdal888
@badblueman
Holy fucking monkey shit that was awesome to read!
My favorite part was when Heimdal888 pointed out that Kohversohver had just forfeited the debate with the words "personal insults, and name calling, the last resort of the one w/o any argument left."
I also came when Kohversohver said hydrogen had a neutron... fuck... I'm a nerd.
bobdull420 8 months ago
this accelerator is the one which looks like LHC ( large Hadron Collider).
GurimujoJackerjack 8 months ago
i guess the smallest particle is infinite like a universe.
markjason2 8 months ago
@markjason2 So do I.
Bergami1 8 months ago
wait i thought atoms cant be seen, how do we know that they are there?
ThePlatoon4 8 months ago
@ThePlatoon4 They 'observe' 'particles' by proxy. In a collider they have a variety of detection methods that allow them to infer 'particle' by the energy states observed following collisions.
Larger 'particles' such as atoms can be 'seen' [I know lots of ''s but it saves qualifying everything] by other methods.
Look up electron microscope for an idea of how you might 'see' an atom.
Huttate1 8 months ago
It does not get said enough: people do NOT need to READ more physics books and expositions of physics books (e.g. like by Hawking) in order to get a better understanding of physics (relativity, quantum, low-power, environmental, bio-, whatever). One needs to DO physics. Since we don't have our own labs, that means doing the mathematical homework exercises.
(I capitalized only 3 words. That's ok, right? That wasn't excessive, was it?)
mphello 8 months ago
4-20-2012 You got a job? Go on strike until they legalize cannabis! It's the only way to get full scale recreational legalization! Be the change! All you have to do is spread the word to everyone you know and every website you visit! Start a chainmail, get pro pot organizations involved. Blog about it. Like it. Thumbs up this message everywhere you see it! Let this message grow like a weed! We are the Marijuana Nation! On 4-20-2012 don't go to work instead toke up and protest! WE ARE DEFIANT!
!
WiiLink89 9 months ago
@WiiLink89 I agree, drugs should be legal. But, I don't understand why you've
made this your 'life's work'.
I think you are on the wrong track. Drugs are an adjunct to life, not a end.
But, good luck on your journey, I hope you find what your looking for.
fntime 8 months ago
@fntime I can answer that: because one is lucky in life to have the strength and energy and time to fight for even ONE cause in this life, even though one may care about many. That gives people the false impression that activists/class action lawyers/freedom fighter/soldiers/lobbyists - whatever you want to call them - fighting for a single cause, are "fanatics", when, in fact, if they had the time and money, they would tackle all the causes they want.
mphello 8 months ago
@mphello And a corollary to that: if you're the one in prison for any one reason -
e.g. falsely accused of a rape or murder and imprisoned due to a corrupt legal system
e.g. in prison for a law that shouldn't be in the first place - e.g. a communist law in Vietnam against owning a small business or personal marijuana sale and consumption in America -
it is physically impossible to fight for other causes until one is out of prison,
so one must fight THAT cause first.
mphello 8 months ago
at 1:45 is carl sagan look alike
walkmanez 9 months ago
I was Wondring of WHY All the Planet in the Universe in not COLIDING each Other? Can you please elaborate it for me.. Thank You!- Dennis of the Philippines
phepster 9 months ago
I was Wondring of WHY All the Planet in the Universe in not COLIDING each Other? Can you please elaborate it for me.. Thank You!- Dennis of the Philippines
phepster 9 months ago
she said photon or proton
TheDevilvivek 9 months ago
Protons, neutrons, electrons, positrons, neutrinos, quarks, leptons, byrons, mesons, pions, kaons, gluons, and the list keeps growing as an abstract from an imaginary plane. Non of it can be proved. If you consider instead that atoms are weaves of energy that interrelate as unique arrays of frequencies having distinct values which form families and communities of families of frequencies that weave to form atoms, you'd be fairly close to being able to design a means to synthetize atoms at will.
jqs1943 9 months ago
Black energy is the most destructive level of the frequency spectrum.These frequencies range way above the ultraviolet to a hyper level. Their wave lengths are so short that they can pervade even the tightest weaves of matter. These hyper frequencies are constituents of all matter to some degree.Fire radfioactivity, gamma rays,are some examples of energies that are dcirectly associated to black energy.If we are to consider that there is such a thing as anti matter consider black energy instead
jqs1943 9 months ago
2:06 Anyone notice the golden spirals in the patterns?
Kingofdiamonds999 10 months ago
Atoms are a simple devise of nature that define all that there is within the universe. By dividing earth's diameter by its age and working the problem down to the one second time period, you will end up with the average diameter of the atom which is 3 billionths of one inch, or 90 billionths of one milliometer. Atoms are weaves of energies that interrelate as families of frequencies. Quarks are abstracts of an imaginary plane that fail to define that which is real.
jqs1943 10 months ago
Is it the building blocks of Matter or the Building Blocks of an Atom. Because if there is such thing as anti-matter, doesn't that debunk the study of the Atom as the smallest particle that can exist?
tnguyen318 9 months ago
@tnguyen318 Atoms are the smallest particles to still be elements. If it is not at least 1 atom it cannot be called an element. The subatomic particles like quarks are the smallest constituents of matter we've discovered. Anti-matter is the same as matter but with an opposite charge. Like the positron is the anti-particle of the electron and along with an anti-proton it could be able to form anti-hydrogen. Humans have not observed anti-matter in significant quantities.
Woopeehole1337 9 months ago
An Atom is a Lie.
tnguyen318 9 months ago
@tnguyen318 Why do you say that?
I'm interested, not looking to argue.
Thanks
fntime 8 months ago
The original meaning of an Atom was described by the Greeks as the smallest unit of measurement possible. Show me a photo of the smallest unit of measurement possible. How is that Photo Derived? Using the word Atom to describe the entire workings of something else that's "electromagnetic" will just confuse everybody. The word Atom should no longer be used, only what it is relative to and in the Text of Greek Science and Philosophy.
tnguyen318 8 months ago
@tnguyen318 I think it might be only you that is confused by words. No scientist thinks an atom is indivisible, or that protons, electrons or quarks are particles in the ultimate sense. They use terminology that is tried and tested to allow them to communicate ideas.
Huttate1 8 months ago
How can you communicate? You don't even understand what you're saying.
tnguyen318 8 months ago
@tnguyen318 Was there a point to that?
Huttate1 8 months ago
@Woopeehole1337 They actually create and trap it routinely now in small quantities to experiment with. And there capture and retention methods are improving continually.
Huttate1 8 months ago
Jk:) dude science is the way to everything:)
2011carp 10 months ago
None of this is true. Ur all being fed lies by fake "proof". There is no such thing as what they r talking about. If u wish to know the truth I suggest reading the bible. That is where all is explained:)
2011carp 10 months ago
@2011carp lmao uy fuckin god fag, bible is FICTION to keep dumb fucks like u in line ,as a slave of the church
meatmachine666 9 months ago
the first 6 seconds of this video is kind of what i see when I close my eyes. sounds crazy? not to me,
Catskywatcher113005 10 months ago
Holy cow, this idiot still thinks electrons orbit around a nucleus!!!!
kate4978 10 months ago
@kate4978 say what? it doesn't? pls explain to me where it orbits. from what i've been learning,electrons orbit the nucleus of an atom within it's shell.
krisis619 9 months ago
Show me in the bible where the quark is mentioned. If it aint in the bible it aint there. God Said It, I Believe It, That Settles It
699backstab 11 months ago
@699backstab come on now. the bible doesn't mention computers and a world wide web but they exist. you cannot SEE the world wide web and it obviously isn't mentioned in the bible...you should stop using the internet if that is your logic
xXxAdelaidexx 10 months ago
@xXxAdelaidexx you got trolled kid. Look up my comments to see just how bad
699backstab 10 months ago
@heimdal888 I am wrong,you are right,everyone is perfect in their own design.
Oh come on...you can't really believe that in this vast and endless universe YOU are right and I am WRONG? There is truth in every lie and a bit of lies in every truth.
Perfection is creation and all we have to do is enjoy the art.
I hope you can improve yourself when it comes to reading between the lines,because you obviously misinterpreted a lot of my truthy "lies".
Have a good day/night Mr.Force
kohversohver 11 months ago
@heimdal888 Prove that balance is not a force,without the help of theories or formulas.
Thanks for the attention,einstein.
Take a deep breath,relax,stay calm,clear your head...i'll rather laugh at you,so i guess there's no harm done.
kohversohver 11 months ago
@kohversohver "Prove that balance is not a force,without the help of theories or formulas."
...
....
.....
HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!! XD HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Holy crap dude, you are really something =') you sir, have really made me laugh, and i have to thank you at least for that. You're still wrong, but funny ... LMAO. Originally I wasn't going to answer but that comment was just too precious to let it pass.
Oh .... and you're welcome ... Schrödinger HAHAHA!! XD
heimdal888 11 months ago 37
@heimdal888 Best conversation on youtube yet.. Haha It was like reading a short story where a person gets OWNED from the inside out intellectually. What was so beautiful about it is it happened so smoothly. Bravo, sir, bravo. Make it into a play, it's a modern day Shakespeare.
requshei 7 months ago
@kohversohver HAHAHAHA! You stupid fuck.
TheNakedQuack 9 months ago
@TheNakedQuack I am a stupid fuck, no more, no less than you. The only difference between being a stupid fuck like me and a stupid fuck like you is the fact that i don't go around telling other people the obvious without anything new or informing to say, which renders your comment as stupid as you...thank you for proving your intelligence :)
kohversohver 9 months ago
@kohversohver Hey man... what are you smoking?? Looks like you don´t get the mesage, you keep thinking that you can understand the entire universe, and it seems like you don´t like fisic... or you can´t understand it.
I´m so sorry :(
LOL :D
JMCZA 8 months ago
@JMCZA ups... Physics.
JMCZA 8 months ago
@JMCZA I do believe i understand the entire universe. In fact, i'm as old as this universe including you and everything else that's contained within it. My simple answer is this, there is no right or wrong in our universe. Why? Because everything evolves, including matter. The connections that these particles create result in the reality that we process and define with our logic. 13.75 ± 0.11 billion years ago it all begun. There were no molecules, no humans, no perception. Now there is.
kohversohver 7 months ago
@JMCZA The truth is that we know everything that we're supposed to know right from the start since birth, because the possibilities of thought in our brains are endless. But when we start to limit the way we think and discipline our mind, those other realities become impossible and imperfect in design. So we accept what we are told and base our assumptions on what interacts with our mind. I mean come on...religion is probably bullshit and yet it's one of the largest belief systems out there.
kohversohver 7 months ago
@JMCZA And although you can put out hundreds of facts that disprove the existence of god, people still believe in him. MILLIONS of people in fact. And although this might not sound like much of an example, i'm still going to put it out here, because i don't care what people think of my "sanity" or not. There are probably millions of people who would tell me to fuck off and millions who would agree with me. So that's not the issue here. But basically, let me put it this way. Emotions...
kohversohver 7 months ago
@JMCZA Let's take a look at these forces/emotions that are supposedly good and evil. Anger towards others and fear that results in more anger. And the direct opposite, love towards others. Love isn't bad in moderate quantities and anger isn't bad in moderate quantities. The balance. It's what yin-yang represents. You can't have one without the other. Just like you can't have life without death. Even stars are born and eventually die. Three cycles of life. Birth-life-death.
kohversohver 7 months ago
@JMCZA Now i think it's fairly obvious to state that you can't have people being born without some of them dying. Yin-yang is the same, you can't have one without the other. Birth-death,LIFE is just the time that you spend between your birth and your death. Just like Yin-yang is the result of yin and yang combined. The gears of our universe are put in motion by the very same principles. The CORE foundations. Time is a product of matter interacting with the space that surrounds it.
kohversohver 7 months ago
@JMCZA Space is the foundation in which matter can even exist and that is why it's referred to space-time,rather than matter-time. And these two(that create a third) major forces, that pretty much express in everything throughout this universe, are forces that the whole universe must abide to. They may be expressed in different forms such as light/dark birth/death past/future up quark/down quark proton/electron male/female. People have many names for it, but it's all the same. Yin-Yang.
kohversohver 7 months ago
@JMCZA Thus, i referred to balance as a force, because my view of the universe is very inductive. The positive force, that drives it all and the negative force, that allows interaction between Alfa and Omega. Imagine a universe that would only have birth and no death. Stars being born, but none of them dying. Impossible is it not? Perhaps the choice of words was wrong indeed. Balance is not a force. Balance is everything that results from the forces which are balanced. And everything IS balanced
kohversohver 7 months ago
@JMCZA If everything were not balanced within our universe, then from a imaginative perspective outside our universe the universe would not look like it is whole. Which means that the universe he is seeing, is not the whole. Something like god's view. A view that sees the beginning, the present and the future all rolled up into one big picture. It would HAVE to be balanced, because it would contain the beginning, the present and the future. Which means everything there is in our universe.
kohversohver 7 months ago
@kohversohver OK... looks like your mind has opened a bit more. I just pointed out that the word "Balance" as a force wasn´t the right word, and thus it created a bunch of misunderstanding. I agree with you in some of your ideas ´cuse I know the atoms in our bodies are as old as our own sun... thus we share a same origen. Balance is needed, but is not a force... it is important, but is the result of forces interactions...So, you needed to clear your head about what the word Balance really means
JMCZA 7 months ago
Comment removed
JMCZA 7 months ago
@kohversohver Just one more advice, you need to polish your physics... see ya...
JMCZA 7 months ago
@JMCZA cheers
kohversohver 7 months ago
When scientists consider my theory as being more of a reality than a theorem, a properly constructed lattice chamber will be planed and construcet at a lesser cost than a particle collider that will prove to be more productive than chassing quarks or kaons, or pions or neutrinos! Then and only then, will we be able to see the reality of the universe as it evolved since the dawn of time.
jqs1943 11 months ago
Quarks as well as all other subatomic conglomerates of the atomic theory are a misconstrued myth that will never be proved. If you think of the atom in its simplicity as being made up of a weave of energies, you will be closer to the real thing. Divide earth's diameter by its age, work the calculation down to the one second time period, and you will end up with the average diameter of the atom or 3 billionths of one inch. Eventualy intrinsic lattices of matter will be synthetized in the lab.
jqs1943 11 months ago
@heimdal888 Balance is not a force,nobody created our universe,you aren't ironic,im not sarcastic and physics are able to explain everything we know.
So if physics say that balance is not a force,it is obviously correct.
The universe itself is a force and you apparently don't wish to understand it,but to be controlled by it.
Now succumb to your own ignorance and stupidity which is summoned by your ancestors who didn't think about their genetically imprinted future.
I rule my emotions,not VV.
kohversohver 11 months ago
@kohversohver "I rule my emotions,not VV" Yep, your response clearly shows it ;)
If you knew as much physics as you say you do, you would've seen that balance is not a force right away, instead you keep trying to pass your personal believes as solid theories, and they are not. So, you'r either willfully ignorant or purposely dishonest. In either case, is obvious you want attention, and I've given you more than enough, so relax, take a breath, and keep your theology and believes out science.
heimdal888 11 months ago
Does anyone else notice the simularities in atoms and our solar sustem...Makes you think
NoCaRAAY 11 months ago
@heimdal888 You don't understand what balance is mate,i understand your equasion,but i'm talking about EQUILIBRIUM perhaps the use of the word BALANCE was too inadequate because i didn't know you would go all fucking newton on me.
Even E=MC2 is in balance.You affect one condition and the other ones change immediately.
I believe your perspective is too shallow to grasp my point.
Birth-life-death +=-
You can't explain the cyclic forces of the universe with some idiotic equasions i'm sorry.
kohversohver 11 months ago
@kohversohver lol Balance and Equilibrium are synonyms mate. Yes, E=mc2 is balanced, thats why its called an equation. "You can't explain the cyclic forces of the universe with some idiotic equations" but thats what you've been trying to do all along, with your mass/energy/time eq, the proton/electron/atom/holy trinity eq, and now with the birth/life/death "eq". Perhaps it is not my perspective that is shallow, but rather your point lacks clarity. Take a deep breath and try again tomorrow.
heimdal888 11 months ago 7
am i the first comment with short text?
Radector 11 months ago