looks better than my i3-560 & his4850 but after playing fsx from its beginnings, reading numerous threads and watching tons of videos I must say it heavily sucks.It will never play smooth because it is poorely coded. Regardless of used procesors, graphics etc it will always lag, jerk back & forth and look square unless someone rewrites the whole source code. Whatever Microsoft does eats lots of resources and sucks - compare IE to Firefox. It's not FPS problem it's code related, shame on authors
What sort of FPS drop do you get with Fraps? If it's making it too laggy to get decent video from, you need to take another look at your new PC. I have a core2duo processor and still manage to get half decent fraps video by playing with display settings, so I'm a little bit baffled that a Core i7 system wouldn't do better.
there is no contest going on.. I don't understand your problem. I agree, you DONT NEED a pc like that.. that's why virtually NOBODY HAS ONE. That's why his videos are informative, because he shows what is possible with modern parts
@crashmax73 Why are you wasting your money on dumb stuff? My i7-920 @ 4.2ghz and 5870 runs FSX just as well as that if not better with my tweaks. You just wasted 1 grand on the 980x, and going to waste another 500 on the gtx480 which is actually worse than the 5870 in some parts?
@uberwagn Your 4.2Ghz Quad core + ATI runs FSX better than his 4.6Ghz 6 Core + Nvidia? I want some of the stuff your smoking. Nvidia is what you want for FSX end of story.
@OriginalAtomicSheep - sorry man, but your post reeks of ignorance. You must not know much about PCs and FSX. The only thing to be gained from a Nvidia over ATI is SLIGHTLY better image quality, thats it. After bojote's shader mod, the 5870 can run just as well with super sampling. FSX also doesn't take advantage of 4 cores fully, much less 6. Not starting a fight here, my first post may have come off the wrong way, but just stating the facts.
@uberwagn yer i know fsx doest utilise all 6 cores, I was referring more to the clock speeds and the cache of the 980x and yes the difference in performance between nvidia and ati will be minimal. I did take ur post a bit too literally but I think it might be a bit too extreme to be taken as anything but literally wrong :P but I see you were just making a ridiculous claim to prove a point. But yer, 4.6ghz is nothing to scoff at for FSX.
spectacular i couldnt wait to buy my new prozessor
drummer96able 9 months ago
Hey great videos mate. But I think the i7 2600k 4,6GHZ runs smoother :-)
Sandy Bridge is at the moment the most powerful CPU on this earth!
Thanks for sharing your videos.
speedytommy007 1 year ago
looks better than my i3-560 & his4850 but after playing fsx from its beginnings, reading numerous threads and watching tons of videos I must say it heavily sucks.It will never play smooth because it is poorely coded. Regardless of used procesors, graphics etc it will always lag, jerk back & forth and look square unless someone rewrites the whole source code. Whatever Microsoft does eats lots of resources and sucks - compare IE to Firefox. It's not FPS problem it's code related, shame on authors
rangelso 1 year ago
Cool vid. however have yo considered Droping the clocks a little and giving Hyperthreading a go? what differences in performance arw you seeing?
adamjamesroe 1 year ago
thats nice now where is the traffic and add ons :), got the same CPU/GTX 580 SLI, they costed me my pants and way more
HansensUniverse 1 year ago
Just play FSX on one hard drive and record with FRAPS to another hard drive. This way, the FPS drop won't be as huge.
jacklkw98 1 year ago
What sort of FPS drop do you get with Fraps? If it's making it too laggy to get decent video from, you need to take another look at your new PC. I have a core2duo processor and still manage to get half decent fraps video by playing with display settings, so I'm a little bit baffled that a Core i7 system wouldn't do better.
tjf4375 1 year ago
damn. so great!
MonsterRage 1 year ago
I wish I could turn my FSX up that high!
WindowsAndMacintosh 1 year ago
Hey man, great vid, but you reeeeaally need REX 2, as the potential for it to look AMAZING is great on this pc....
CessnaFlyBoy92 1 year ago
Hey FSXHD92 and uberwagn, go get a hotel room seriously.
drbackjack 1 year ago
@drbackjack
I deleted they're unnecessary comments. Thank you for jumping in.
crashmax73 1 year ago
lol go for a xeon...
Maxbladee 1 year ago
Awesome... I'm still trying to work out how to get crap stable above 20 fps with a 920 at 4.2 ghz. Just doesn't wanna have it!
Can't wait to see more from this and really wanna know the results once you get the 480
wwwJUSTiNDUPREcom 1 year ago
there is no contest going on.. I don't understand your problem. I agree, you DONT NEED a pc like that.. that's why virtually NOBODY HAS ONE. That's why his videos are informative, because he shows what is possible with modern parts
michelarjuna 1 year ago
Wow, I have seen the future. Amazing. This will probably be my next cpu, or maybe a 12 core.
XanaduZune 1 year ago
What is your video card?
poeticmind74 1 year ago
ATI 5870. Will be replaced by GTX480
crashmax73 1 year ago
Got gtx480? :D
jcdb666 1 year ago
@jcdb666
Not yet. Have to wait aprox. 14 days longer ;-(
crashmax73 1 year ago
@crashmax73 Why are you wasting your money on dumb stuff? My i7-920 @ 4.2ghz and 5870 runs FSX just as well as that if not better with my tweaks. You just wasted 1 grand on the 980x, and going to waste another 500 on the gtx480 which is actually worse than the 5870 in some parts?
uberwagn 1 year ago
@uberwagn
no worry. I'm an overclocker and I bought this stuff not only for FSX ;-)
crashmax73 1 year ago
@crashmax73 rgr
uberwagn 1 year ago
much did u pay for ya pc m8
reedy111111111111111 1 year ago
@uberwagn this is not wastign money some people are doing some heavy duty stuff and need propper hardvare ATI sucks BTW
FSXHD92 1 year ago
Comment removed
OriginalAtomicSheep 1 year ago
@uberwagn Your 4.2Ghz Quad core + ATI runs FSX better than his 4.6Ghz 6 Core + Nvidia? I want some of the stuff your smoking. Nvidia is what you want for FSX end of story.
OriginalAtomicSheep 1 year ago
Comment removed
uberwagn 1 year ago
@OriginalAtomicSheep - sorry man, but your post reeks of ignorance. You must not know much about PCs and FSX. The only thing to be gained from a Nvidia over ATI is SLIGHTLY better image quality, thats it. After bojote's shader mod, the 5870 can run just as well with super sampling. FSX also doesn't take advantage of 4 cores fully, much less 6. Not starting a fight here, my first post may have come off the wrong way, but just stating the facts.
uberwagn 1 year ago
@uberwagn yer i know fsx doest utilise all 6 cores, I was referring more to the clock speeds and the cache of the 980x and yes the difference in performance between nvidia and ati will be minimal. I did take ur post a bit too literally but I think it might be a bit too extreme to be taken as anything but literally wrong :P but I see you were just making a ridiculous claim to prove a point. But yer, 4.6ghz is nothing to scoff at for FSX.
OriginalAtomicSheep 1 year ago
@uberwagn And seriously dude, youre 29, shouldve figured out jealousy by now.
OriginalAtomicSheep 1 year ago
Nice. Very smooth when passing a crowd of skyscrapers. Above 25 fps??
jcdb666 1 year ago
Thank you! FPS are between 23 and 28.
crashmax73 1 year ago
niiceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
MUNI743 1 year ago