ye i like angela better i hated johan but i bought burning bridges and actually he is alright for what he was and fuck he is way better than gay shit like suicide silence and bring me the horizon thir fags but still i like angela better
Michael Amott is definately one of the main gods of deah metal he might even be the god of melodic death metal Carcass dominated with heartwork and even better with swansong when they went melodic death and arch enemy is just amazing nguitar playing in every song such a high quality guitarist
Btw his wikipedia main [photo with carcass looks cool :D
thats true but u go to admit that they are still ok bucause its not the vocalist who makes the band is the drummer and the guitarists soo i think they were better with johan but well it dosn't have to be the same always it has to chage too same thing that happend with Nightwish!
But I like Arch Enemy with Johan or Angela. They are my favorite band, and you nobody can call me an Angela fan-boy because I own all the Johan Albums.
@ZackT618 Word. People can say they like both, but it is a fact that Johan had a much greater range, both in terms of going from low growls to high screams, and emotionally, going from desperate pleading to pure rage within a single verse. Angela has one register and one register only. It's adequate, but there's absolutely nothing unique or special about her.
I love the album, and I liked arch enemy before and after the switch, but I don't think that it's angela fans I think they have the worlds best guitarist(writes most of their songs so ya....) and drummer! so stop complaining about the switch the band decided to pick her, and they've kept her till now so she can't be that bad :P
You know like Arch enemy both ways. Angela has talent and she is doing well for her self and I think she did not hurt Arch enemy at all when she became the lead singer.
i just read the info... what do you think about the rerecording they are making at the moment?? personely i'm not one of the socalled "angela fan boys" (xD), but if this is the cd quality, the new i better... the rerecording at wages of sin i better quality though..
i love the groove of this song, makes me feel like im ready for battle somehow hehe, amazing how catchy arch enemy can be regardless of their progression
I like Angela's vocals better personally, but I don't even think the vocals even matter that much. The real star of the band is Michael. His melodies give meaning to whatever the vocalists say.
Tis amusing how you posted several comments saying Michael does the fast solos and Chris the melodic ones then you get proved wrong and just so 'I DONT CAAAAARE'
i'm not saying i don't care in ignorance, i just don't give a shit. really, i don't. what possible benefit could i have from being right? i thought mike played faster and chris played more melodically. i was wrong. BOO FUCKING HOO, would you like me to complain and argue a fact that's obviously wrong? and secondly, nobody has been proved wrong, there's just more people disagreeing than agreeing, so instead of arguing like a dumbass, i stopped.
I think the point that guy was making was that rather than just admitting you were wrong you claim suddenly not to care despite making 2 comments on the subject already...Makes you appear a bit like a whiney child...its funny though so keep at it!
i realize that, but why do i have to admit i'm wrong when i clearly am? is everyone too fucking retarded to infer that when i said i don't care, what i actually meant is that i didn't care? what i believed to be true was wrong, but it isn't like i was trying to convince the whole world i was right. once the second person disputed my thoughts, i realized they were probably right, but instead of stating how wrong i was, i hoped people would catch on that i didn't want to argue.
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the first version of that song and i think better than '99 version.
One of best Arch Enemy songs with Johan Liiva.
Avatar9n 1 month ago
Johan Liiva rules
netxus 3 months ago in playlist Más vídeos de malawolf85
i cant imagine how awesome arch enemy would be with Liiva now
maurelelele 7 months ago 2
terrible quality you posted...jesus...noobs these days.
bustsomecaps 8 months ago
@bustsomecaps >myfacewhen this was posted in 2008. Noob.
TheCursedEarth 6 months ago
@TheCursedEarth back in 2008 they had quality videos please, go away. noob.
bustsomecaps 6 months ago
the solo pierces right straight into my heart...
A TRUE EARGASM
despite the fact i stopped listening to death metal a while ago but still this song brings back the good old days
BabylonLynx 9 months ago
3:57
click
have eargasm
thank me for link
and these guys for the awesome song
HerveGamerDude 9 months ago
@HerveGamerDude
I'm not gonna thank you for shit. You left out the other 4 minutes of the song.
Krow83 6 months ago
@Krow83 ok suit yourself i liked this part when i posted this comment but now i dont even remember this song
i do remember that "bury me an angel" off this record was kick ass all the way through
HerveGamerDude 6 months ago
one riff sounds like enter sandman
but this isnt a sellout song tho :
HerveGamerDude 9 months ago
shit, bad compression abroad
TheFadingLife 10 months ago
XD"amo esta cancion, la adoro, me encanta.
helensanchezz 11 months ago
one of the best song from black earth \m/
VivieneSolange 1 year ago
ye i like angela better i hated johan but i bought burning bridges and actually he is alright for what he was and fuck he is way better than gay shit like suicide silence and bring me the horizon thir fags but still i like angela better
PaullyMetalhead 1 year ago
Michael Amott is definately one of the main gods of deah metal he might even be the god of melodic death metal Carcass dominated with heartwork and even better with swansong when they went melodic death and arch enemy is just amazing nguitar playing in every song such a high quality guitarist
Btw his wikipedia main [photo with carcass looks cool :D
Quieeeeeeeepiecheese 1 year ago
@Quieeeeeeeepiecheese
so you're giving Mike Amott credit for inventing melodic death metal and Carcass now are you?
fucking n00b.
fieryfather 1 year ago
@fieryfather learn to read, all he was saying is that carcass made some fucking badass melodic death metal
medude6652 1 year ago
agree with that
RenanSCstratocaster 1 year ago
personally, i like both Johan and Angela are both great, people who pick sides are always wrong, in my opinion.
rch3579 1 year ago
My favorite Arch Enemy song. If you like Johan, check out the other band he was in: Nonexist, they had some great tunes too.
Peter7Paul 2 years ago
@Peter7Paul he's also in Hearse now
namenamethedrood 2 years ago
Nice default Malawolf, isn't that the female fox god from Spice and Wolf... I forgot her name XD
theif519 2 years ago
She's a wolf god and her name is Horo. XD
malawolf85 2 years ago
thats true but u go to admit that they are still ok bucause its not the vocalist who makes the band is the drummer and the guitarists soo i think they were better with johan but well it dosn't have to be the same always it has to chage too same thing that happend with Nightwish!
drakoblood 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Johan always has been and always will be better than Angela! When she stepped in, Arch Enemy turned all to shit. The real Arch Enemy died in 1999!
ZackT618 2 years ago
Give Angela a break! I mean she is one of the only female death metal singers in the entire world!
daglasses2 2 years ago 2
@daglasses2 They still have the Agnostic
theif519 2 years ago
Lol @ angela being one of the only female death metal vocalist in the world. Check Zeenon,Estuary, Wetwork and Valhalla (the Brazilian one) out
CorrodingCsejthe 2 years ago
Zeenon rules. They sound similar to Decapitated.
metaldrummer3211 2 years ago
Angela is awesome. I love her as a vocalist.
But I like Arch Enemy with Johan or Angela. They are my favorite band, and you nobody can call me an Angela fan-boy because I own all the Johan Albums.
vitorduartesnake 2 years ago 6
@ZackT618 Word. People can say they like both, but it is a fact that Johan had a much greater range, both in terms of going from low growls to high screams, and emotionally, going from desperate pleading to pure rage within a single verse. Angela has one register and one register only. It's adequate, but there's absolutely nothing unique or special about her.
achilleselbow 2 weeks ago
renatonigro look up beast of man live johan is great
TheMetalHQ 2 years ago 2
I love the album, and I liked arch enemy before and after the switch, but I don't think that it's angela fans I think they have the worlds best guitarist(writes most of their songs so ya....) and drummer! so stop complaining about the switch the band decided to pick her, and they've kept her till now so she can't be that bad :P
geniotic 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This album is awesome, a shame that Liiva sucked on live performances
renatonigro 2 years ago
You know like Arch enemy both ways. Angela has talent and she is doing well for her self and I think she did not hurt Arch enemy at all when she became the lead singer.
Zionvile666 2 years ago 2
i just read the info... what do you think about the rerecording they are making at the moment?? personely i'm not one of the socalled "angela fan boys" (xD), but if this is the cd quality, the new i better... the rerecording at wages of sin i better quality though..
guitarnoobcake 2 years ago 2
i think johan was better XD
baselghost999 2 years ago 6
Comment removed
guitarnoobcake 2 years ago
i thought so xD
guitarnoobcake 2 years ago
i know that michael compose all the guitars.. it's true?
MrAbominio 2 years ago
i love the groove of this song, makes me feel like im ready for battle somehow hehe, amazing how catchy arch enemy can be regardless of their progression
uruzumi 2 years ago 2
I like Angela's vocals better personally, but I don't even think the vocals even matter that much. The real star of the band is Michael. His melodies give meaning to whatever the vocalists say.
Cloc817 3 years ago 21
and chris theyre botth amazing
chrisemp21 3 years ago
i think chris has better melodies. michael has the usually faster solo's, chirs's are more melodic
ledzeppelin7510 2 years ago
I think you have them mixed up. Michael's solo's are usually more melodic while Chris' are more technical.
Cloc817 2 years ago
i'm not talking about technicallity, i'm talking in terms of speed. Michaels are usually faster, while chris's usually holds a melody
ledzeppelin7510 2 years ago
No, it's Micheal that has the melody. Chris' solo's are fast, as well as being technical.
gamble7man 2 years ago
honestly, i don't care, their both fucking gods
ledzeppelin7510 2 years ago
Tis amusing how you posted several comments saying Michael does the fast solos and Chris the melodic ones then you get proved wrong and just so 'I DONT CAAAAARE'
MetalguitarlessonsUK 2 years ago 3
i'm not saying i don't care in ignorance, i just don't give a shit. really, i don't. what possible benefit could i have from being right? i thought mike played faster and chris played more melodically. i was wrong. BOO FUCKING HOO, would you like me to complain and argue a fact that's obviously wrong? and secondly, nobody has been proved wrong, there's just more people disagreeing than agreeing, so instead of arguing like a dumbass, i stopped.
ledzeppelin7510 2 years ago
I think the point that guy was making was that rather than just admitting you were wrong you claim suddenly not to care despite making 2 comments on the subject already...Makes you appear a bit like a whiney child...its funny though so keep at it!
ChrissyChiChi 2 years ago 2
i realize that, but why do i have to admit i'm wrong when i clearly am? is everyone too fucking retarded to infer that when i said i don't care, what i actually meant is that i didn't care? what i believed to be true was wrong, but it isn't like i was trying to convince the whole world i was right. once the second person disputed my thoughts, i realized they were probably right, but instead of stating how wrong i was, i hoped people would catch on that i didn't want to argue.
ledzeppelin7510 2 years ago
hehe what a dumbass
dischordrock 2 years ago
Yep, of all the modern-day guitarists, Michael Amott reigns S U P R E M E !
JesusTehNinja 2 years ago
This version rules the '99 and Angela TOGETHER
Kubikiri1 3 years ago
This sounds more diabolical than the newest version from Wages of Sin II
IzRx 3 years ago
this one is much better
renatonigro 3 years ago
"why is it in slow motion?" lol lol lol. you kids are hilarious, not having a clue of where arch enemy started, dumb fucks.
zeroeyes20 3 years ago 20
well it sucks
I prefer the faster version
turgore 3 years ago
@zeroeyes20 Haha the REAL question should be "why does it NOT sound like shit?" lmao
SCREAMSofAGONY 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why is it in slow motion ?
turgore 3 years ago
This is the older version
googoopot 3 years ago
my bad. I have the Japanese bonus track which is a little faster .
turgore 3 years ago 4
Great song, I only heard the B-Brudges version so this was a bit weirder
Snwrestling 3 years ago
i cant find that one.
dynamitetool666 3 years ago
This song's fucking awesome ! I miss Johann !
NuttensoOhn 3 years ago 4
yeah!! but i preffer the burning bridges verssion =D
PiErRe6363 3 years ago