Alright so in the end they said that they could reach the Dino. Time and the Dino. Was destroyesed by a huge meter so what I some how we creat a worm hole and a mistake happen and the meter some how slip inside the worm hole and destroyesed the whole process and we are set back in time? Just a thought
Alright so in the end they said that they could reach the Dino. Time and the Dino. Was destroyesed by a huge meter so what I some how we creat a worm hole and a mistake happen and the meter some how slip inside the worm hole and destroyesed the whole process and we are set back in time? Just a thought
Alright so in the end they said that they could reach the Dino. Time and the Dino. Was destroyesed by a huge meter so what I some how we creat a worm hole and a mistake happen and the meter some how slip inside the worm hole and destroyesed the whole process and we are set back in time? Just a thought
I imagine some, if not all of it, are his words, but someone else is obviously reading them. I guess using a narrator was an aesthetic choice, as maybe they thought it would be smoother or easier to understand for the audience. I have no idea how Hawking sounded before the disease took his speech away, but I remember him saying that the only regret he had about his voice synthesizer in the beginning is that it had an American accent.
If we even invented a giant wormhole machine then we wouldn't need to invent it because it would have always been there due to us using it to travel back in time in the first place making it exist there already. Perhaps we have already created a Wormhole, who wants to go find it with me?
You can travel back in time if you can stabilse the wormhole. But for that you would properly need exotic material, with negative energy. And you can only go back to the moment where the wormhole was created. And since the wormholes only exist for a really short period of time, the possibilily of going back to the dinosaurs is none.
It doesn't work like that. If you traveled to a position you occupied yesterday, say a chair you were sitting in, does that mean that you exist in that chair a day in the past just because you were once in that same position at a previous time? It's not about just position, it's about attaining high speed and immense gravity to bend the space/time fabric back around on itself.
if you constructed a wormhole to reach the past on earth, ( like 3:51 ) wouldnt you have to travel unfathomable distances in the opposite direction of our planet, solar system, and galaxy to meet the earth where it was even a year ago?
One day, perhaps in my life-time, physicists will realize that the notion of time does not exist, and therefore the very notion of time travel will be scrapped forever. Both the past and the future are only constructs of the human mind and not tangible realities. Only the present moment can ever be experienced and science will never be able to send anything "back" or forwards in time for even a fraction of a nanosecond!!
Wormholes to travel vast distances though, is achievable.
I was more thinking of having a wormhole near the earth and the other one next to that new planet that looks exactly like the earth. But that new planet is 600 light years away from us. So if we could use the wormholes nothing could stop us from taking over the universe :D
@overworld12 Its a typo buddy get over it I could have criticized you for not capitalizing I but I didn't. Its very arrogant of you to look down on people much smarter then you because your can't wrap your brain around their concepts.
OKAY IF TIME TRAVELL WAS REAL. first if we descoverd it and could go to the past . then would we not teach ourselves in the past how to use it ? and if we did that then we wouldnt have to figure out how to use it... u cant argue that its because we havnt discovered it yet because if we were to discover it we would allready know it so it is not a possibility . at that level
This is related to the Grandfather paradox, wherein you travel into the past and kill your grandfather, thus negating your existence. However, if you negate your existence, that means you did not kill your grandfather and that means you are alive. But you cannot be alive since you killed your grandfather, but if you killed your grandfather, you can't be alive to kill your grandfather, etc. Traveling into the past potentially violates causality, but there are workaround ideas.
It's probably not something we will see in our lifetime. But, it's possible causality can protect itself.
One suggestion is that the moment a time traveler goes back into the past, time itself "splits", like a river dividing. So, anything you do in Timeline B, does not affect anything that happens in Timeline A, where you originally came from.
@inagod The wormhole would be transferring you through time, not a "spot in line," per se. Plus, it said you would have to travel near the speed of light. No planet is orbiting around the Sun at the speed of light. Think of it this way: you are running track. You come up on a ribbon. You break through the ribbon to find yourself in a ghost town with horrible overgrowth. Or in somebody's living room! Get it?
How could the ship come out near the earth again when the earth, our solar system and even our galaxy are moving through space at insanely high speeds?
If you enlarge a wormhole, won't the distance/ time traveled be a billion trillion trillionths larger? Or does the size of a wormhole not effect the possible journey?
Applications of this doesn't serve any purpose i guess. Worth contemplating it though. I strongly feel when we get to read the rest of those particle physics things this will cancel out by itself or if a spy films fan will say "It's Ethan Hunt in latex face as worm hole " ha ha ( Face changes the character changes too )
Here is an obvious question; So, if wormholes were created possible, and humans had the capability of traveling through them, that means they escaped through the 3rd dimention, right? and they no longer lived in the time arrow. Or, would it mean that they continued to live in one time arrow just by a different moment in time? What would happen to the first time arrow? Would one time section completely transfer? Would one have 2 different perceptions and realitys of yourself both living in diff
So if wormholes can let a ship travel back to a point in time..then what if the things we call aliens are actually us from the future visiting different points in time. Maybe somewhere in the future we figured out how wormholes work.
I don't see how you could choose where the wormhole would be, its a natural thing unless there is some way to modify them. Plus what I've researched on time Travel, it has always been that you could never travel be in time any further then when the time machine was built. But I can see how using worm holes could change that, since as said they are natural.
@iamDarkOutcast Yes, but has been a possibility WAY before the game. In the distant future if we don't kill ourselves first, we might probably have colonies in habitable planets or moons. We could terraform an inhospitable planet/moon if we had the technology and the resources.
I'm sory but this doesnt realy mean anything. This teory of worm holes is very interesting but the rest is garbage you are talking about extending a worm hole and geting into it with a spaceship XD. OK you are talking abot dinazors wich lived millions of years ago.. guess what universe is about 14 billion years old and our planet is 7 where this worm hole lead to is far more interesing i think what about 999999999 billion years is noting when we think of random time in cosmos.(sry abut my eng)
@thebigblob417 Let me clear it up then - I happen to agree with his post - there is nothing in the vid that states that you can accurately place the wormhole entrance at a specific time, like 18 for the time travellers to watch the end of world war 1, and therefore, the wormhole exit might just as well (actually, the most likely scenario) end up at a time when there is absolutely nothing to see or percieve.
If we could place the exit at a specified time, that would be more interesting.
this is interesting yes but it completely fake bullshit time travel is impossible i dont believe at all how the heck would u go back to the dinosaurs i mean com on they already died
@gomezkenneth92 Trying to fathom time travel is like a cave man trying to conceive the idea of a rocket ship. The concept is difficult to grasp for now but no one can truly say where science can take us 400 years from now. We wouldn't use time travel to go back to the dinosaurs, but we would definitely need an efficient way to travel to other planets once the resources for life on earth are completely diminished. The fate of our species actually relies on this principle.
Its not going to happen. 1. how do you expand said wormhole? 2. Is this a gravitational by product? If so...well, it becomes a black hole, and how do you escape the "other side". 3. Has a wormhole even been observed?
@discolemonade66 science is such a weird subject .. physics is the weirdest in the field of science ,it tackles the weird relm of the atoms , sub-atomic particles and such , if physics shows that a 'thing" is possible , but has problems,physicists will soon find ways to overcome this ... :D i do hope im still alive when this happens xD
I would like to clarify my explanation blow any quantum foam exists within our environment it will be consumed by the gravity force or molecules within inner space. It will be impossible to collect enough quantum foam to built worm hole within inner space or outer space close to earth.
Unfortunately quantum foam exists only dark parts of the universe where as no disturbance going on ! Energy always attracted to energy any planet still has energy strength in it it will be attracted planets energy which is the gravity or molecules the ones trapped within that planets inner space. That will be impossible built worm hole cause you cannot hold the energy in the place.
is it possible that time travel already exist? and thats why we have ancient cultures with numerous descriptions of "space ships" or "people from the sky". what if we have already time traveled numerous times and those who have time traveled shaped much of our future which is known to us as TODAY.
But if they shaped our future, and we came before them, things would be radically different in what would have been their lifetime, and they would not have existed to ever change anything in the past. It's a paradox, and I don't think it could happen.
but what if that was the way it was set to be without shaping the past what if them doing that was the right thing to do to make TODAY then there would be no paradox as it was ment to be so nothing has changed.
@GrantPooSmells if it was the way it was meant to be and time travel ultimately had no effect on today then doesnt that make the time travel itself irrelevant? couldnt it just have been the right way regardless of if it was affected or not? seems that what you've stated is a suggestion of a linear existence in which nothing affects time or outcome, even if it is in fact affected.
no, it doesn't make time travel irrelevant, and it undermines linear time, as future events somehow precede "preceding" events. It avoids a paradox by circular reasoning...
@mellamosean there is absolutely no suggestions anywhere that say future event precede "preceding" events. even so, that concept is still suggestive of linear time. if precedings are preceded, then there would be a never ending cycle of time based dependency in which each second would have to be governed accordingly, which is impossible for a physical being to manage. even still, time is linear, regardless of influence, especially if its preceding, cuz its also predetermined, hence, linear.
you understand that my comment was what I believed to be a clarification of the implications of the scenario (for lack of better word) proposed by GrantPooSmells, right? The future affecting the pre-future is what I was referring to with the "precede 'preceding' events. Linear, as I understand means the past precedes the future. Predetermined does not imply linear. In fact, nonlinear only makes sense to me in a non-predetermined model.
That completely undermines causality and only makes sense if you look at it from a sort of "divine plan" perspective in which the past and future can equally affect each other. In your model, there is no linear time, and the past does not precede the future. I would disagree, as I believe the past does precede the future. I mean think about what you're saying; if someone comes from the "future" to influence the presence w/o paradox, then the future preceded the present.
#1 dinosaurs? no... unless caveman made this portal and placed it in space during that time. to place a wormhole there you'd have to travel back into time in the first place. #2 does time even exist? Im pretty sure its just measurements and the translation of an objects current position. tell me if im wrong please
the only way this would be possible is if they travel to different dimensions. Because we have no evidence of them taking refuge in the past. So it just would not make sense
what if you could paste those together, and see where they are going and on that basis if they could make a device which indicates where you could go now that would be awesome :)
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
Science is about proving things by what we can see/observe/measure. I was onboard with a pool table not being "flat" and a pool ball not being "smooth" when you zoom in close enough. We can see that. But then the narrator just takes a turn to left field and asks us to just trust him that there are "tiny crevices, wrinkles, and voids in time." It's not scientific to "trust me". That sounds more like a religious belief system to me. just take it on faith.... don't worry if it sounds crazy..
@spudsak He was saying that a basic physic principle is that nothing is flat and that it has crevices and little scratches. This basic principle also applies to time. I hope that helps.
I'm no physics guy but this was the first Stephan Hawking Documentary I've watched.. it was complete bullshit and a waste of time.. he just conjures up some stupid theoretical situations on time travel then disproves them all...I have lost all respect for this man after watching the full documentary.. it was just a way for him to make a quick buck
@MrErikchavez I'm not arguing whether its possible or not. Its just that he goes on to say that it is impossible to expand one of those tiny wormholes using modern technology and he also says that going back in time is a paradox.
That is why I'm saying the doc was a waste of time, he just thought up crap then disproved it.
Even if NASA successfully creates a wormhole it is useless because the object sent in will end up very far away, probably somewhere that communication is deemed impossible
But according to one of Hawking's other videos, traveling to the past is impossible. [/snarky comment]
Anyway, since these wormholes are forged in the very fabric of space-time, and the Earth, Solar System, the galaxy, and the entire universe are always in motion, you could build a worm hole, but good luck keeping it close to Earth or any other location, unless you want it to be in deadspace in a few hours. (The solar system is orbiting the galactic core at 885,139 kilometers per second.)
ok but for time traveling someone has to be in the past already to anchor the other end of the wormhole. the best we could do is establish one in the present, then use it in the future to come back to this time
@nett103 i'm right with you. don't understand this one bit. i just have a bad feeling that one of these days scientists are going to try to do something like this and completely screw up the entire universe lol
@Mischifer6
What do u think? This is the narrator talking obviously.
tnair112 15 hours ago
Whatever we humans put are minds to we can achieve
elvisflorian 22 hours ago
Who cares about dinos there's far more crazier creatures out their we haven't explored
elvisflorian 22 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Alright so in the end they said that they could reach the Dino. Time and the Dino. Was destroyesed by a huge meter so what I some how we creat a worm hole and a mistake happen and the meter some how slip inside the worm hole and destroyesed the whole process and we are set back in time? Just a thought
XxNWA96xX 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Alright so in the end they said that they could reach the Dino. Time and the Dino. Was destroyesed by a huge meter so what I some how we creat a worm hole and a mistake happen and the meter some how slip inside the worm hole and destroyesed the whole process and we are set back in time? Just a thought
XxNWA96xX 4 days ago
Alright so in the end they said that they could reach the Dino. Time and the Dino. Was destroyesed by a huge meter so what I some how we creat a worm hole and a mistake happen and the meter some how slip inside the worm hole and destroyesed the whole process and we are set back in time? Just a thought
XxNWA96xX 4 days ago
ok, what is up with the blur in and out?
if you can't show it, then don't, but stop with the bluring, gives me a headach
caveman0812 5 days ago
Where's Hawking? is this his real voice, as it's not the robotic wheelchair talking?
Mischifer6 1 week ago
@Mischifer6
I imagine some, if not all of it, are his words, but someone else is obviously reading them. I guess using a narrator was an aesthetic choice, as maybe they thought it would be smoother or easier to understand for the audience. I have no idea how Hawking sounded before the disease took his speech away, but I remember him saying that the only regret he had about his voice synthesizer in the beginning is that it had an American accent.
dunnono00 1 week ago
science is awesome but scary shit at the same time we could fuck up everything...
javalavadingdonglolz 2 weeks ago
If we even invented a giant wormhole machine then we wouldn't need to invent it because it would have always been there due to us using it to travel back in time in the first place making it exist there already. Perhaps we have already created a Wormhole, who wants to go find it with me?
TrollAholicAnonymous 2 weeks ago 3
so thats how dinosaurs died XD
HazzaMurray 3 weeks ago
ok... so SOMEDAY time travel is possible, so why dont people from the future come to the present now?
jakelugmirror 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
dunnono00 3 weeks ago
@jakelugmirror
Actually, I can put it in a shorter way:
How do you know they haven't?
dunnono00 3 weeks ago
is that possible? and would the wormhole be in the same place just at a diferent time?
theforeverstone 3 weeks ago
You can travel back in time if you can stabilse the wormhole. But for that you would properly need exotic material, with negative energy. And you can only go back to the moment where the wormhole was created. And since the wormholes only exist for a really short period of time, the possibilily of going back to the dinosaurs is none.
bossamus 3 weeks ago
They shouldn't cancelled off Stargate Universe..
digitalkrashed 4 weeks ago
It doesn't work like that. If you traveled to a position you occupied yesterday, say a chair you were sitting in, does that mean that you exist in that chair a day in the past just because you were once in that same position at a previous time? It's not about just position, it's about attaining high speed and immense gravity to bend the space/time fabric back around on itself.
darrenholcomb42 1 month ago
if you constructed a wormhole to reach the past on earth, ( like 3:51 ) wouldnt you have to travel unfathomable distances in the opposite direction of our planet, solar system, and galaxy to meet the earth where it was even a year ago?
Nogoals92 1 month ago 4
remember when the world was flat
100anzoid 1 month ago
snm.
DICKIEMONSTER 1 month ago
snm.
DICKIEMONSTER 1 month ago
One day, perhaps in my life-time, physicists will realize that the notion of time does not exist, and therefore the very notion of time travel will be scrapped forever. Both the past and the future are only constructs of the human mind and not tangible realities. Only the present moment can ever be experienced and science will never be able to send anything "back" or forwards in time for even a fraction of a nanosecond!!
Wormholes to travel vast distances though, is achievable.
RobbeyT 1 month ago
I was more thinking of having a wormhole near the earth and the other one next to that new planet that looks exactly like the earth. But that new planet is 600 light years away from us. So if we could use the wormholes nothing could stop us from taking over the universe :D
marlb0r015 1 month ago
who even came up with these ridiculous ideas?
overworld12 1 month ago
@overworld12 Read the title.
scandiescot2 4 weeks ago
@overworld12 People infinitely more intellignet then you.
cjs2964 3 weeks ago
@cjs2964 i must be dumb because i don't know the word "intellignet"
overworld12 3 weeks ago
@overworld12 Its a typo buddy get over it I could have criticized you for not capitalizing I but I didn't. Its very arrogant of you to look down on people much smarter then you because your can't wrap your brain around their concepts.
cjs2964 3 weeks ago
@cjs2964 lol r u angry
overworld12 3 weeks ago
OKAY IF TIME TRAVELL WAS REAL. first if we descoverd it and could go to the past . then would we not teach ourselves in the past how to use it ? and if we did that then we wouldnt have to figure out how to use it... u cant argue that its because we havnt discovered it yet because if we were to discover it we would allready know it so it is not a possibility . at that level
mcbjboy 1 month ago
@mcbjboy
This is related to the Grandfather paradox, wherein you travel into the past and kill your grandfather, thus negating your existence. However, if you negate your existence, that means you did not kill your grandfather and that means you are alive. But you cannot be alive since you killed your grandfather, but if you killed your grandfather, you can't be alive to kill your grandfather, etc. Traveling into the past potentially violates causality, but there are workaround ideas.
dunnono00 1 month ago
@dunnono00 that is a very confusing concept. i think time travell should be left alone
mcbjboy 1 month ago
@mcbjboy
It's probably not something we will see in our lifetime. But, it's possible causality can protect itself.
One suggestion is that the moment a time traveler goes back into the past, time itself "splits", like a river dividing. So, anything you do in Timeline B, does not affect anything that happens in Timeline A, where you originally came from.
dunnono00 1 month ago
@dunnono00 that makes sense thank you .
mcbjboy 1 month ago
@mcbjboy that's not true actually. that would be the same as the "grandfather paradox"
franky1l 1 month ago
@inagod The wormhole would be transferring you through time, not a "spot in line," per se. Plus, it said you would have to travel near the speed of light. No planet is orbiting around the Sun at the speed of light. Think of it this way: you are running track. You come up on a ribbon. You break through the ribbon to find yourself in a ghost town with horrible overgrowth. Or in somebody's living room! Get it?
TheRealAmsterdam 2 months ago
@mcrettable One of the proper ways to put it would have "I can't believe there are a lot of people that don't find this interesting."
TheRealAmsterdam 2 months ago
Lmao. Maybe dinosaurs could witness the ship coming in for a landing- backshadowing...
Also, vv----- one of those closed minded people
TheRealAmsterdam 2 months ago
How could the ship come out near the earth again when the earth, our solar system and even our galaxy are moving through space at insanely high speeds?
maccollo 2 months ago
If you enlarge a wormhole, won't the distance/ time traveled be a billion trillion trillionths larger? Or does the size of a wormhole not effect the possible journey?
mcrettable 2 months ago
I can't believe a lot of people don't find this interesting :O
mcrettable 2 months ago
@mcrettable only 1 dislike,most find this interesting,students,professionals ,everyone loves this stuff.
inagod 2 months ago
@inagod No I mean that the amount of people around the world interested is very few compared to those who aren't :(
mcrettable 2 months ago
Applications of this doesn't serve any purpose i guess. Worth contemplating it though. I strongly feel when we get to read the rest of those particle physics things this will cancel out by itself or if a spy films fan will say "It's Ethan Hunt in latex face as worm hole " ha ha ( Face changes the character changes too )
cozmynameisonit 2 months ago
Comment removed
cozmynameisonit 2 months ago
@gomezkenneth92 you are wrong time travel can be made several way's
xxMRPLAYERGAMERxx 2 months ago
Where can i get the rest of this video??
TheLevelerABR 2 months ago
if wormholes are real... then y u no has spaceships flying in right now, from the future??
SkateLikeABoss 2 months ago
@SkateLikeABoss
videomakerman1232 2 months ago
@SkateLikeABoss
Can't back in time....only forward
mercanaries3 2 months ago
Here is an obvious question; So, if wormholes were created possible, and humans had the capability of traveling through them, that means they escaped through the 3rd dimention, right? and they no longer lived in the time arrow. Or, would it mean that they continued to live in one time arrow just by a different moment in time? What would happen to the first time arrow? Would one time section completely transfer? Would one have 2 different perceptions and realitys of yourself both living in diff
TheShadowThug 2 months ago
Am i the only one who when watching this thought about stargate lol
MrSignalPlus 2 months ago
So if wormholes can let a ship travel back to a point in time..then what if the things we call aliens are actually us from the future visiting different points in time. Maybe somewhere in the future we figured out how wormholes work.
Crazy shit to think about
BBryandownes 2 months ago
I don't see how you could choose where the wormhole would be, its a natural thing unless there is some way to modify them. Plus what I've researched on time Travel, it has always been that you could never travel be in time any further then when the time machine was built. But I can see how using worm holes could change that, since as said they are natural.
Chevypower265 2 months ago
Halo is just a video game but it gave me the idea it could be possible we could colonize other planets for resources and stuff. Right?
iamDarkOutcast 3 months ago
@iamDarkOutcast Yes, but has been a possibility WAY before the game. In the distant future if we don't kill ourselves first, we might probably have colonies in habitable planets or moons. We could terraform an inhospitable planet/moon if we had the technology and the resources.
ItsAlberOliva 3 months ago
just going back would screw up the space time continuum
Techgod63 3 months ago
OMG humans killed the Dinosaurs!!!
Willaras 3 months ago
I'm sory but this doesnt realy mean anything. This teory of worm holes is very interesting but the rest is garbage you are talking about extending a worm hole and geting into it with a spaceship XD. OK you are talking abot dinazors wich lived millions of years ago.. guess what universe is about 14 billion years old and our planet is 7 where this worm hole lead to is far more interesing i think what about 999999999 billion years is noting when we think of random time in cosmos.(sry abut my eng)
canoai 3 months ago
@canoai your comment don't event make any logical bloody sense mate.
thebigblob417 3 months ago
@thebigblob417 Let me clear it up then - I happen to agree with his post - there is nothing in the vid that states that you can accurately place the wormhole entrance at a specific time, like 18 for the time travellers to watch the end of world war 1, and therefore, the wormhole exit might just as well (actually, the most likely scenario) end up at a time when there is absolutely nothing to see or percieve.
If we could place the exit at a specified time, that would be more interesting.
Kojak0 3 months ago
@Kojak0 yeah but they would have to be careful not to screw time up, u know not to interfere with time.
thebigblob417 3 months ago
this is interesting yes but it completely fake bullshit time travel is impossible i dont believe at all how the heck would u go back to the dinosaurs i mean com on they already died
gomezkenneth92 2 months ago
@gomezkenneth92 Trying to fathom time travel is like a cave man trying to conceive the idea of a rocket ship. The concept is difficult to grasp for now but no one can truly say where science can take us 400 years from now. We wouldn't use time travel to go back to the dinosaurs, but we would definitely need an efficient way to travel to other planets once the resources for life on earth are completely diminished. The fate of our species actually relies on this principle.
MargaritaMeshini 2 months ago 10
@MargaritaMeshini But today, we, are all "sons & daughters" of caveman, and we did make a rocket!
Kvz2011 1 month ago
@MargaritaMeshini That is, if we don't destroy ourselves until then.
bijansta200 6 hours ago
Can our universe be some sort of a calabi-yau manifold ???
IvanderHaisley 4 months ago
Its not going to happen. 1. how do you expand said wormhole? 2. Is this a gravitational by product? If so...well, it becomes a black hole, and how do you escape the "other side". 3. Has a wormhole even been observed?
discolemonade66 4 months ago
@discolemonade66 science is such a weird subject .. physics is the weirdest in the field of science ,it tackles the weird relm of the atoms , sub-atomic particles and such , if physics shows that a 'thing" is possible , but has problems,physicists will soon find ways to overcome this ... :D i do hope im still alive when this happens xD
IvanderHaisley 4 months ago
that would explain UFOs
davorm5 4 months ago
yeah, i got a question for your worm hole, what happens if you look at it from the other face of the 'disk' shaped entrance
Kassidar 4 months ago
I would like to clarify my explanation blow any quantum foam exists within our environment it will be consumed by the gravity force or molecules within inner space. It will be impossible to collect enough quantum foam to built worm hole within inner space or outer space close to earth.
Levon9404 5 months ago
Unfortunately quantum foam exists only dark parts of the universe where as no disturbance going on ! Energy always attracted to energy any planet still has energy strength in it it will be attracted planets energy which is the gravity or molecules the ones trapped within that planets inner space. That will be impossible built worm hole cause you cannot hold the energy in the place.
Levon9404 5 months ago
wana see wormhole? play EVE!!!!!
oberonson18 5 months ago
is it possible that time travel already exist? and thats why we have ancient cultures with numerous descriptions of "space ships" or "people from the sky". what if we have already time traveled numerous times and those who have time traveled shaped much of our future which is known to us as TODAY.
beaudiggler 5 months ago
@beaudiggler
But if they shaped our future, and we came before them, things would be radically different in what would have been their lifetime, and they would not have existed to ever change anything in the past. It's a paradox, and I don't think it could happen.
mellamosean 5 months ago
@mellamosean
but what if that was the way it was set to be without shaping the past what if them doing that was the right thing to do to make TODAY then there would be no paradox as it was ment to be so nothing has changed.
GrantPooSmells 5 months ago
@GrantPooSmells if it was the way it was meant to be and time travel ultimately had no effect on today then doesnt that make the time travel itself irrelevant? couldnt it just have been the right way regardless of if it was affected or not? seems that what you've stated is a suggestion of a linear existence in which nothing affects time or outcome, even if it is in fact affected.
ronis2cool 5 months ago
@ronis2cool
no, it doesn't make time travel irrelevant, and it undermines linear time, as future events somehow precede "preceding" events. It avoids a paradox by circular reasoning...
mellamosean 5 months ago
@mellamosean there is absolutely no suggestions anywhere that say future event precede "preceding" events. even so, that concept is still suggestive of linear time. if precedings are preceded, then there would be a never ending cycle of time based dependency in which each second would have to be governed accordingly, which is impossible for a physical being to manage. even still, time is linear, regardless of influence, especially if its preceding, cuz its also predetermined, hence, linear.
ronis2cool 5 months ago
@ronis2cool
you understand that my comment was what I believed to be a clarification of the implications of the scenario (for lack of better word) proposed by GrantPooSmells, right? The future affecting the pre-future is what I was referring to with the "precede 'preceding' events. Linear, as I understand means the past precedes the future. Predetermined does not imply linear. In fact, nonlinear only makes sense to me in a non-predetermined model.
mellamosean 5 months ago
@GrantPooSmells
That completely undermines causality and only makes sense if you look at it from a sort of "divine plan" perspective in which the past and future can equally affect each other. In your model, there is no linear time, and the past does not precede the future. I would disagree, as I believe the past does precede the future. I mean think about what you're saying; if someone comes from the "future" to influence the presence w/o paradox, then the future preceded the present.
mellamosean 5 months ago
@DonkeyPunchYoBitch Yo dawg...
swebuilder 5 months ago
Vagina is a warmhole too right ?
deleted70 6 months ago
#1 dinosaurs? no... unless caveman made this portal and placed it in space during that time. to place a wormhole there you'd have to travel back into time in the first place. #2 does time even exist? Im pretty sure its just measurements and the translation of an objects current position. tell me if im wrong please
Fangman123789 6 months ago
the only way this would be possible is if they travel to different dimensions. Because we have no evidence of them taking refuge in the past. So it just would not make sense
ChunkzTV 6 months ago
Why not just call them timeholes? :P
youtubian2500 6 months ago
what if you could paste those together, and see where they are going and on that basis if they could make a device which indicates where you could go now that would be awesome :)
djfreshflash 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (DONATED) FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 6 months ago
Science is about proving things by what we can see/observe/measure. I was onboard with a pool table not being "flat" and a pool ball not being "smooth" when you zoom in close enough. We can see that. But then the narrator just takes a turn to left field and asks us to just trust him that there are "tiny crevices, wrinkles, and voids in time." It's not scientific to "trust me". That sounds more like a religious belief system to me. just take it on faith.... don't worry if it sounds crazy..
spudsak 6 months ago 7
@spudsak Incase this changes anything, the "narrator" is speaking for Stephen Hawking
roloug95 1 month ago
@spudsak He was saying that a basic physic principle is that nothing is flat and that it has crevices and little scratches. This basic principle also applies to time. I hope that helps.
countzulu99 1 month ago
I'm no physics guy but this was the first Stephan Hawking Documentary I've watched.. it was complete bullshit and a waste of time.. he just conjures up some stupid theoretical situations on time travel then disproves them all...I have lost all respect for this man after watching the full documentary.. it was just a way for him to make a quick buck
person1500 7 months ago
@person1500
now what he said is true wormholes do exist imagine taking a piece of paper
now fold that paper in half
that is how a wormhole works it makes a small connection from small to great distances in space temporarily
but wormholes are mainly big and connect different places in space
nasa has started a project to make a temporary rip in time and space using black hole's gravity and eventually making a wormhole aka a time machine
MrErikchavez 7 months ago
@MrErikchavez I'm not arguing whether its possible or not. Its just that he goes on to say that it is impossible to expand one of those tiny wormholes using modern technology and he also says that going back in time is a paradox.
That is why I'm saying the doc was a waste of time, he just thought up crap then disproved it.
Even if NASA successfully creates a wormhole it is useless because the object sent in will end up very far away, probably somewhere that communication is deemed impossible
person1500 6 months ago
@person1500 im sorry i feel bad now :(
MrErikchavez 6 months ago
@person1500 Hawking has already banked $20,000,000 - c. £11 million (2011 British Rich List). Keep lining his pockets folks, he loves you all!
juslivinok23 6 months ago
But according to one of Hawking's other videos, traveling to the past is impossible. [/snarky comment]
Anyway, since these wormholes are forged in the very fabric of space-time, and the Earth, Solar System, the galaxy, and the entire universe are always in motion, you could build a worm hole, but good luck keeping it close to Earth or any other location, unless you want it to be in deadspace in a few hours. (The solar system is orbiting the galactic core at 885,139 kilometers per second.)
Levitikai 7 months ago
ok but for time traveling someone has to be in the past already to anchor the other end of the wormhole. the best we could do is establish one in the present, then use it in the future to come back to this time
tokesateer 8 months ago
I cant even begin to fathom this.
nett103 9 months ago 2
@nett103 i'm right with you. don't understand this one bit. i just have a bad feeling that one of these days scientists are going to try to do something like this and completely screw up the entire universe lol
gzambito22 9 months ago