It's really a case of the Chinese not giving credit to the copyright owners of the melody where credit was due. I am sure the Chinese knew it was another song but like all privacy, and plagiarism rampant in china, they thought they could get away with this. This case is different from the mascot's incident. At least the reasons defending the originality of the mascot were slightly more convincing. This incident smacks of downright plagiarism (since no attribution was given initially. )
the chinky language is noisiest and ugliest in the world. what a ching cong chang.
tokyosanmachan 1 year ago
nothing but copycat!!
henry1127 1 year ago 2
look at it this way, in this closely knitted digital age, plagiarism is everywhere, not just in CHINA, perhaps in a different dimension.
cheamk 1 year ago
It's really a case of the Chinese not giving credit to the copyright owners of the melody where credit was due. I am sure the Chinese knew it was another song but like all privacy, and plagiarism rampant in china, they thought they could get away with this. This case is different from the mascot's incident. At least the reasons defending the originality of the mascot were slightly more convincing. This incident smacks of downright plagiarism (since no attribution was given initially. )
laux0048 1 year ago