Governments change numbers up in the sellers banks reserve account at the fed when it spends and does the reverse when it taxes. Unlike us the users, the government has to spend its currency of issue before it can collect a tax liablilty in it. Can the New York subway system collect tokens before it spends them. No. It doesn't work the way you think it does and that makes people who do not know better dangerous.
Skildesky is a smart man. Look, any government with a nonconvertable currency on a floating exchange rate will never run out of money. I know it feels natural to worry about the government debt but it is the issuer of currency. We are the users. BIG difference. The inflationistas would have you beleive that the government spends one way when times are good and prints money when things go bad. Not true. The government never prints money.
The State saved us from the depression.... LOL.... LOL... We are SAVED!!!! 16 % Unemployment, Record housing decline, and 14 Trillion National Debt... Yeah we are saved... LOL
@GnomesAmok So you are claiming that the current 9.1% unemployment is fantastic? I bet you were one of those guys saying that unemployment was disastrous when it was on 5% under Bush. You man Obama has really improved it as we all know 9.1 is lower then 5
Keynes explained an economic phenomena, which until his publication in 1936 of the General Theory, could not be explained by any economic theory. That is he explained in that publication the reason that markets sometimes operate at less than maximum utilization, which although obvious classical economic theory denied. Keynes however did not advocate in any publication any of the policies currently utilized in attempting to controll the U. S. economy, and criticized Rosevelts pump priming.
@temporaldisplacement As JM Keynes, Milton Friedman and others have pointed out, a deficit does not have to accumulate as extra debt. It can perfectly well accumulate as extra monetary base.
there has been non 're-introduction' of keynesianism. keynesianism was replaced by monetarists for a brief period in the 1980s, other than that keynesianism has been ruining the economy for 70 years. for any dissenter... stagflation... that is all.
Governments change numbers up in the sellers banks reserve account at the fed when it spends and does the reverse when it taxes. Unlike us the users, the government has to spend its currency of issue before it can collect a tax liablilty in it. Can the New York subway system collect tokens before it spends them. No. It doesn't work the way you think it does and that makes people who do not know better dangerous.
rodneyorondeaujr 5 months ago
Skildesky is a smart man. Look, any government with a nonconvertable currency on a floating exchange rate will never run out of money. I know it feels natural to worry about the government debt but it is the issuer of currency. We are the users. BIG difference. The inflationistas would have you beleive that the government spends one way when times are good and prints money when things go bad. Not true. The government never prints money.
rodneyorondeaujr 5 months ago
The State saved us from the depression.... LOL.... LOL... We are SAVED!!!! 16 % Unemployment, Record housing decline, and 14 Trillion National Debt... Yeah we are saved... LOL
Hunterkirk 10 months ago
@Hunterkirk
16%?
GnomesAmok 6 months ago
@GnomesAmok If you include those on unemployment with those who are no longer looking for employment... yes 16% or higher
Hunterkirk 6 months ago
@Hunterkirk
No longer looking for employment? Well thats bullshit. People not on unemployment are no detriment to the economy.
GnomesAmok 6 months ago
@GnomesAmok So you are claiming that the current 9.1% unemployment is fantastic? I bet you were one of those guys saying that unemployment was disastrous when it was on 5% under Bush. You man Obama has really improved it as we all know 9.1 is lower then 5
Hunterkirk 6 months ago
@GnomesAmok They, more than people on unemployment benefits, are detriment to the economy.
freedomthrough 6 months ago
Keynes explained an economic phenomena, which until his publication in 1936 of the General Theory, could not be explained by any economic theory. That is he explained in that publication the reason that markets sometimes operate at less than maximum utilization, which although obvious classical economic theory denied. Keynes however did not advocate in any publication any of the policies currently utilized in attempting to controll the U. S. economy, and criticized Rosevelts pump priming.
5thgeorge 1 year ago
If Barry Obama's and Labour's economic policy is Keynesianism then I'm a banana.
The PPE graduates in the media simply equate Keynes = spend, Hayek/Mises = don't spend. Both of these equations are wrong.
d1bx4pp 1 year ago
Keynes theory applied to indebted nations = Dumb.
temporaldisplacement 1 year ago
@temporaldisplacement
America was in debt when Keynes theory was applied the first time.
GnomesAmok 6 months ago
@GnomesAmok And now america is in how many trillions of dollars in debt?
temporaldisplacement 6 months ago
It doesn't matter, you enact a recovery and the debt gets payed down when the economy is better, not worse. Pretty simple, really.
GnomesAmok 6 months ago
@GnomesAmok Are you predicting economic growth?
temporaldisplacement 6 months ago
@temporaldisplacement
If they manage this shit properly, overhaul the regulatory system, raise the debt ceiling, create a few million more jobs then, yeah, OF COURSE!
GnomesAmok 6 months ago
@GnomesAmok I'm up for all of the above. (with the exception of rasing the debt ceiling.)
temporaldisplacement 6 months ago
@temporaldisplacement As JM Keynes, Milton Friedman and others have pointed out, a deficit does not have to accumulate as extra debt. It can perfectly well accumulate as extra monetary base.
freedomthrough 6 months ago
@freedomthrough 1: Your first mistake was to quote Keynes on economics.
2: Deficit: deficiency in amount. [not to be confused with: 'extra' anything.]
temporaldisplacement 6 months ago
@temporaldisplacement 1. I guess you're a Hayekian hyperinflationist, then?
2. What?
freedomthrough 6 months ago
@freedomthrough 1: Pretty much.
2: Derp.
temporaldisplacement 6 months ago
there has been non 're-introduction' of keynesianism. keynesianism was replaced by monetarists for a brief period in the 1980s, other than that keynesianism has been ruining the economy for 70 years. for any dissenter... stagflation... that is all.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
Production is colomn for the strong economy with that comes savings = POWER ...
aviomaster 1 year ago